Forensic Mental Health Assessments

doi:10.1017/9781108848916.025

3.4 - Forensic Mental Health Assessments

from Part III - Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2021

Derek Perkins and

Susannah Hughes

Edited by

Jennifer M. Brown and

Miranda A. H. Horvath

Show author details

Jennifer M. Brown: Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Miranda A. H. Horvath: Affiliation:
University of Suffolk

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Forensic mental health is the interface between mental disorder and the courts and embraces a wide range of risk and clinical need assessments related to medical, psychological and social therapies. This chapter describes the nature and purposes of forensic mental health assessments in different settings (community, prison, hospital) and at different stages in mentally disordered offenders’ pathways to recovery (assessments at court, inpatient treatment, imprisonment and transitions to the community). It sets out assessment aims and the methods used to address these; outlines the main forensic mental health diagnostic systems (DSM-V and ICD-10); and overviews the complementary uses of systematic file review, clinical interviews, behavioural observations, psychometric assessments, structured professional judgement tools and mental disorder diagnoses. It illustrates the interplay between all these issues with two composite case studies at two stages of the individual’s progress, namely at court and at the transition from secure care to the community.

Keywords

Forensic Psychological Disorder Offending Assessment

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology , pp. 388 - 417

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108848916.025 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adshead, G. (2001). Murmurs of discontent: Treatment and treatability of personality disorder. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 7(6), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.7.6.407 Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.Google Scholar

Babchishin, K. M., Nunes, K. L., & Hermann, C. A. (2013). The Validity of the implicit association test (IAT) measures of sexual attraction to children: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sex Behaviour, 42(3), 487–99.Google Scholar

Banse, R., Schmidt, A. F., & Clarbour, J. (2010). Indirect measures of sexual interest in child sex offenders: A multimethod approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3), 319–335.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C., Robertson, M. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(7), 813–22.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S, Robinson, J., & Woodbury-Smith, M. (2006). The Adult Asperger Assessment (AAA): A diagnostic method. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 35(6), 807–819.Google Scholar

Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory–II. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Bernstein, D. P., Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., Walker, E., Pogge, D., Ahluvalia, T., Stokes, J., Handelsman, L., Medrano, M., Desmond, D., & Zule, W. (2003). Development and validation of a brief screening version of the childhood trauma questionnaire. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27(2), 169–190.Google Scholar

Birchwood, M., Gilbert, P., Gilbert, J., Trower, P., Meaden, A., Hay, J., Murray, E., & Miles, J. N. V. (2004). Interpersonal and role-related schema influence the relationship with the dominant ‘voice’ in schizophrenia: A comparison of three models. Journal of Psychological Medicine, 34, 1571–1580.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R. (1998). Criminality and the interpersonal circle in mentally disordered offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25(2), 155–176.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blackburn, R., Logan, C., Donnelly, J., & Renwick, S. (2003). Personality disorders, psychopathy and other mental disorders: Co-morbidity among patients at English and Scottish high-security hospitals. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 14(1), 111–137.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R., Logan, C., Renwick, S., & Donnelly, J. (2005). Higher-order dimensions of personality disorder: Hierarchical structure and relationships with the five-factor model, the interpersonal circle, and psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(6), 597–623.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R., & Renwick, S. J. (1996). Rating scales for measuring the interpersonal circle in forensic psychiatric patients. Psychological Assessment, 8(1), 76–84.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blom-Cooper, Sir L., Brown, M., Dolan, R., & Murphy, E. (1992). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Complaints about Ashworth Hospital, Cmnd 2028, vols 1 and 2 (Chairman: Sir Louis Blom-Cooper). HMSO.Google Scholar

Boer, D. P., Tough, S., & Haaven, J. (2004). Assessment of risk manageability of intellectual disabled sex offenders. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(4), 275–283.Google Scholar

Boer, D. P., Wilson, R. J., Gauthier, C. M., & Hart, S. D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk – 20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. British Columbia Institute Against Family Violence.Google Scholar

Briere, J. (2011). Trauma Symptom Inventory–2 (TSI–2). Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Bruce, T. (2015). The DSM-5 definition of mental disorder: Critique and alternatives. Critical Thinking in Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis, 9(64), 45–68.Google Scholar

Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Cappai, A., Wells, J., Tapp, J., et al. (2017). Substance misuse in personality disorder and schizophrenia: findings and clinical implications from a high secure hospital. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-07–2016–0035 Google Scholar

Chadwick, P., Lees, S., Birchwood, M. (2000). The revised Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ-R). British Journal of Psychiatry, 177(3), 229–232.Google Scholar

Collins, N. (2020). The use of polygraph test in clinical forensic psychiatry setting. In Igoumenou, A. (Ed.), Ethical issues in clinical forensic psychiatry (pp. 85–96). Springer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Daffern, M., Jones, L., & Shine, J. (2010). Wiley series in forensic clinical psychology. Offence paralleling behaviour: A case formulation approach to offender assessment and intervention. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Davidson, M., Humphreys, M. S., Johnstone, E. C., & Cunningham Owens, D. G. (1995). Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among remand prisoners in Scotland. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 545–548.Google Scholar

Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(85). www.sjdm.org/dmidi/Interpersonal_Reactivity_Index.html Google Scholar

Dean, C., & Perkins, D. (2008). Penile plethysmography. Prison Service Journal, 178, 20–25.Google Scholar

de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries, R. (2009). SAPROF: Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk (English version). Forum Educatief.Google Scholar

DiGiuseppe, R., & Tafrate, R. C. (2004). The Anger Disorder Scale: Technical manual. Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., et al. (2013). Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20, Version 3 (HCR-20V3): Development and Overview. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 93–108.Google Scholar

D’Zurilla, T., Nezu, A., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2002). Social Problem-Solving Inventory–Revised (SPSI-R): Manual. Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Edworthy, R., Sampson, S., & Vollm, B. (2016). Inpatient forensic-psychiatric care: Legal frameworks and service provision in three European countries. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 47, 18–27.Google Scholar

Eke, A. W., Helmus, L. M., & Seto, M. C. (2019). A Validation Study of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT). Sexual Abuse, 31(4), 456–476.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1993).?Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R)?[Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t05461-000 Google Scholar

First, M. B., & Gibbon, M. (2004). The structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders (SCID-I) and the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II disorders (SCID-II). In Hilsenroth, M. & Segalaniel, D. L. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment: Vol. 2. Personality assessment (pp. 134–143). John Wiley.Google Scholar

Gudjonsson, G. H., & Singh, K. K. (1989). The revised Gudjonsson blame attribution inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(1), 67–70.Google Scholar

Hammond, S. M., & O’Rourke, M. M. (2004) Developing a psychometric model of risk. Issues in Forensic Psychology, 5, 100–114.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report No. 97–04). Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Mcgrath, R, Kroner, D., et al. (2017). A five-level risk and needs system: Maximizing assessment results in corrections through the development of a common language. http://saratso.org/pdf/A_Five_Level_Risk_and_Needs_System_Report.pdf Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154 –1163.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Scott, H. (1995). Assessing perspective taking among sexual offenders, nonsexual criminals and non-offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 259–277.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessment for sexual offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behaviour, 24(1), 119–136.Google Scholar

Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Harper, C. A., Bartels, R. M., & Hogue, T. E. (2016). Reducing stigma and punitive attitudes toward pedophiles through narrative humanization. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30(5), 533–555.Google Scholar

Hart, S., Douglas, K. S., & Guy, L. (2016). The structured professional judgment approach to violence risk assessment: Origins, nature, and advances. In Craig, L. & Rettenberger, M. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment, treatment of sexual offending (Vol. 2, pp. 643–666). John Wiley.Google Scholar

Hart, S., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R.; with Klaver, J., Logan, C, & Watt, K. A. (2003). The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP): Structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. The Institute Against Family Violence.Google Scholar

Heather, N., & Rollnick, S. (1993). Readiness to Change Questionnaire: User’s manual. University of New South Wales.Google Scholar

Hogue, T., Wesson, C., & Perkins, D. (2016). Eye tracking and assessing sexual interests in forensic contexts. In Boer, D. P. (Ed.), Theories, assessment and treatment of sexual offending. John Wiley.Google Scholar

Home Office/Department of Health. (1986). Offenders suffering from a psychopathic disorder: A joint DHSS/HO consultation document. Home Office/Department of Health.Google Scholar

Johnstone, L., & Dallos, R. (Eds.). (2014). Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed.). RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Jones, L. (2004). Offence paralleling behaviour (OPB) as a framework for assessment and interventions with offenders. In Needs, A. & Towl, G. (Eds.), Applying psychology to forensic practice (pp. 34–63). Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. W., & Eaves, D. (1995). Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (2nd ed.). Institute on Family Violence.Google Scholar

Loranger, A. W., Janca, A., & Sartorius, N. (1997). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorders: The ICD-10 Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maden, A. (2007). Dangerous and severe personality disorder: Antecedents and origins. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 49(49), 8–11.Google Scholar

Markham, S. (2020). Collaborative risk assessment in secure and forensic mental health settings in the UK. General Psychiatry, 33, 1–6.Google Scholar

McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., Rollins, J., & Kinch, J. (2003). TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18(3), 219–238.Google Scholar

Mental Health Act. (2007). Amendments to Mental Health Act 1983. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/12/contents Google Scholar

Mezzich, J. E. (2002). International surveys on the use of ICD-10 and related diagnostic systems. Psychopathology, 35, 72–75.Google Scholar

Millon, T., Grossman, S., & Millon, C. (2015). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–IV manual. Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar

Morey, L. C. (2004). The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). In Maruish, M. E. (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Instruments for adults (pp. 509–551). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Murphy, L., Gottfried, E., Dimario, K., Perkins, D, & Fedoroff, P. (2020). Use of penile plethysmography in the court: A review of practices in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 38(2), 79–99.Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2009). Borderline personality disorder: Treatment and management (NICE Guideline No. 78). www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg78 Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2013). Antisocial personality disorder: Prevention and management (NICE Guideline No. 77). www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg77 Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2016). Mental health problems in people with learning disabilities: Prevention, assessment and management (NICE Guideline No. 54). www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng54 Google Scholar

Ó Ciardha, C., Barnoux, M., Alleyne, E., Tyler, N., Mozova, K., & Gannon, T. (2015). Multiple factors in the assessment of firesetters’ fire interest and attitudes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20(1), 37–47.Google Scholar

Olver, M. E., Wong, S. C. P., Nicholaichuk, T., & Gordon, A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale – Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19(3), 318–329.Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L. (1999). Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS): The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding-7 (user’s manual). Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In Braun, H., Jackson, D., & Wiley, D. (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 39–69). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Perkins, D., Farr, C., Romero, J., Kirkpatrick, T., & Ebrahimjee, A. (2015). DSPD ten years on at Broadmoor. The Prison Service Journal, 128, 10–16.Google Scholar

Santtila, P., Mokros, A., Viljanen, K., Koivisto, M., Sandnabba, N. K., Zappalà, A., et al. (2009). Assessment of sexual interest using a choice reaction time task and priming: A feasibility study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(5), 1081–1090.Google Scholar

Schmidt, A. F., & Perkins, D. E. (2020). Using the Explicit and Implicit Sexual Interest Profile (EISIP) in applied forensic or clinical contexts. In Akerman, G., Perkins, D., & Bartels, R. (Eds.), Assessing and managing problematic sexual interests. Routledge.Google Scholar

Seto, M. C., & Eke, A. W. (2015). Predicting recidivism among adult male child pornography offenders: Development of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT). Law Human Behaviour, 39(4), 416–429.Google Scholar

Smith, G. P. (1997). Assessment of malingering with self-report instruments. In Rogers, R. (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 351–370). Guilford.Google Scholar

Snowden, R. J., Wichter, J., & Gray, N. S. (2008). Implicit and explicit measurements of sexual preference in gay and heterosexual men: A comparison of priming techniques and the Implicit Association Task. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 37(4), 558–565.Google Scholar

Spielberger, D. C. (1999). STAXI-2 state trait anger expression inventory-2, professional manual. PAR.Google Scholar

Stephens, S., Seto, M. C., Cantor, J. M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2019). The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2) may be a measure of pedohebephilia. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 16(10), 1655–1663.Google Scholar

Tennent, G., Tennent, D., Prins, H., & Bedford, A. (1993). Is psychopathic disorder a treatable condition? Medicine, Science and the Law, 33(1), 63–66.Google Scholar

Thornton, D. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 139–153.Google Scholar

Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C., & Erikson, M. (2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 225–235; discussion 236–246.Google Scholar

Tyrer, P., Mulder, R., Crawford, M., Newton-Howes, G., Simonsen, E., Ndetei, D., Koldobsky, N., Fossati, A., Mbatia, J., & Barrett, B. (2010). Personality disorder: A new global perspective. World Psychiatry, 9(1), 56–60.Google Scholar

Walker, J. S. (2005). The Maudsley Violence Questionnaire: Initial validation and reliability. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(1), 187–201.Google Scholar

Walters, G. D. (1995). The psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles. Part I-III: Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 307–325.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2010). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (4th ed.). Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar

Weschler, D. (2010). Wechsler Memory Scale (4th ed.). Pearson.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2011). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2011). Test of Premorbid Functioning. UK version (TOPF UK). Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2016). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Fourth Edition. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Wong, S. C. P., Olver, M. E., Nicholaichuk, T. P., & Gordon, A. (2003). Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version (VRS-SO). Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Young, J. E., & Brown, G. (1990). Young Schema Questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.