Culture Media and Embryo Culture

doi:10.1017/9781108874014.006

Chapter 5 - Culture Media and Embryo Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 April 2021

Arne Sunde and

Roger G. Sturmey

Edited by

Kersti Lundin and

Aisling Ahlström

Show author details

Kersti Lundin: Affiliation:
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg
Aisling Ahlström: Affiliation:
Livio Fertility Center, Gothenburg

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Before considering the basis of embryo culture medium, it is worthwhile reflecting on its function. A detailed overview of embryo metabolism is given in Chapter 4; however, in brief, the embryo must satisfy changing demands for energy by consumption of nutrients from the external milieu (Lewis & Sturmey, 2015). In an in vivo setting, these needs are catered for in a dynamic manner by the secretions of the oviduct; in an in vitro situation, these requirements must be satisfied by the embryo culture medium. In addition to the provision of energy substrates, the medium must also satisfy basic physicochemical requirements. Primarily, the medium must facilitate buffering of pH in response both to changing environments to which the embryo is exposed and to excretion of metabolic waste products, notably lactic acid, which is released by cells with accompanying protons, causing pH to fall. Moreover, the culture medium must avoid inducing osmotic stress. One of the major consumers of cellular energy is the maintenance of intracellular ion composition, maintained through the action of ion pumps. Providing suitable osmolarity and pH are among the most basic requirements of any embryo culture medium.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Manual of Embryo Culture in Human Assisted Reproduction , pp. 42 - 52

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108874014.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aguilar, J, Reyley, M. The uterine tubal fluid : secretion, composition and biological effects. Anim Reprod. 2005;2:91–105.Google Scholar

Almagor, M, Bejar, C, Kafka, I, Yaffe, H. Pregnancy rates after communal growth of preimplantation human embryos in vitro. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:394–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015–0282(16)58507-0 Google Scholar

Barnes, FL, Crombie, A, Gardner, DK, et al. Blastocyst development and birth after in-vitro maturation of human primary oocytes, intracytoplasmic sperm injection and assisted hatching. Hum Reprod. 199;10:3243–3247. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135896 Google Scholar

Biggers, JD, Racowsky, C. The development of fertilized human ova to the blastocyst stage in KSOM (AA) medium: is a two-step protocol necessary? Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;5:133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61615-X Google Scholar

Bontekoe, S, Johnson, N, Blake, D, Marjoribanks, J. Adherence compounds in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive technologies: summary of a Cochrane review. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:1416–1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.010 Google Scholar

Borland, RM, Hazra, S, Biggers, JD, Lechene, CP. The elemental composition of the environments of the gametes and preimplantation embryo during the initiation of pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 1977;16:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod16.2.147 Google Scholar

Brison, DR, Houghton, FD, Falconer, D, et al. Identification of viable embryos in IVF by non-invasive measurement of amino acid turnover. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2319–2324. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh409 Google Scholar

Chatot, CL, Ziomek, CA, Bavister, BD, Lewis, JL, Torres, I. Random-bred 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro. J Reprod Fertil. 1989;86:679–688.Google Scholar

Chronopoulou, E, Harper, JC. IVF culture media: past, present and future. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:39–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu040 Google Scholar

Dieamant, F, Petersen, CG, Mauri, AL, et al. Single versus sequential culture medium: which is better at improving ongoing pregnancy rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017;21:240–246. https://doi:10.5935/1518-0557.20170045 Google Scholar

Dunglison, GF, Barlow, DH, Sargent, IL. Leukaemia inhibitory factor significantly enhances the blastocyst formation rates of human embryos cultured in serum-free medium. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:191–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019016 Google Scholar

Dyrlund, TF, Kirkegaard, K, Poulsen, ET, et al. Unconditioned commercial embryo culture media contain a large variety of non-declared proteins: a comprehensive proteomics analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2421–2430. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu220 Google Scholar

Ebner, T, Shebl, O, Moser, M, Mayer, RB, Arzt, W, Tews, G. Group culture of human zygotes is superior to individual culture in terms of blastulation, implantation and life birth. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:762–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.038 Google Scholar

Elder, K, Johnson, MH. The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969–1978. III. Variations in procedures. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2015;1:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2015.04.004 Google Scholar

Fawzy, M, Emad, M, Elsuity, MA, et al. Cytokines hold promise for human embryo culture in vitro: results of a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:849–857.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.012 Google Scholar

Fernández-Gonzalez, R, Ramirez, MA, Bilbao, A, De Fonseca, FR, Gutiérrez-Adán, A. Suboptimal in vitro culture conditions: an epigenetic origin of long-term health effects. Mol Reprod Dev. 2007;74:1149–1156. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20746. PMID: 17474101 DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20746Google Scholar

Fredrickson, J, Krisher, R, Morbeck, DE. The impact of the protein stabilizer octanoic acid on embryonic development and fetal growth in a murine model. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:1517–1524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0560-9 Google Scholar

Gardner, DK. Mammalian embryo culture in the absence of serum or somatic cell support. Cell Biol Int. 1994;18:1163–1179. https://doi.org/10.1006/cbir.1994.1043 Google Scholar

Gardner, DK. The impact of physiological oxygen during culture, and vitrification for cryopreservation, on the outcome of extended culture in human IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2016;32:137–141.Google Scholar

Gardner, DK, Lane, M. Fertilization and early embryology: alleviation of the “2-cell block” and development to the blastocyst of CF1 mouse embryos: role of amino acids, EDTA and physical parameters. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2703–2712. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019195 Google Scholar

Gardner, DK, Lane, M, Calderon, I, Leeton, J. Environment of the preimplantation human embryo in vivo: metabolite analysis of oviduct and uterine fluids and metabolism of cumulus cells. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:349–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58097-2 Google Scholar

Gardner, DK, Lane, M. Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF? Hum Reprod Update. 1997;3:367–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/3.4.367 Google Scholar

Gardner, DK, Lane, M. Culture of viable human blastocysts in defined sequential serum-free media. Hum Reprod. 1998;13 (Suppl 3), 148–159. https://doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_3.148 Google Scholar

Gardner, DK, Lane, MW, Lane, M. EDTA stimulates cleavage stage bovine embryo development in culture but inhibits blastocyst development and differentiation. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000;57:256–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2795(200011)57:3<256::AID-MRD7>3.0.CO;2-P Google Scholar

Gardner, DK, Phil, D, Vella, P, Lane, M, Wagley, L, Schlenker, T. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:84–88.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gómez, E, Carrocera, S, Martín, D, et al. Efficient one-step direct transfer to recipients of thawed bovine embryos cultured in vitro and frozen in chemically defined medium. Theriogenology. 2020;146:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.THERIOGENOLOGY.2020.01.056 Google Scholar

Hambiliki, F, Hanrieder, J, Bergquist, J, Hreinsson, J, Stavreus-Evers, A, Wånggren, K. Glycoprotein 130 promotes human blastocyst development in vitro. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:592–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.041 Google Scholar

Hammond, J. Recovery and culture of tubal mouse ova. Nature. 1949;163:28–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/163028b0 Google Scholar

Hentemann, M, Mousavi, K, Bertheussen, K. Differential pH in embryo culture. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1291–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.018 Google Scholar

Iritani, A, Gomes, WR, Vandemark, NL. Secretion rates and chemical composition of oviduct and uterine fluids in ewes. Biol Reprod. 1969;1: 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod1.1.72 Google Scholar

Iritani, A, Nishikawa, Y, Gomes, WR, VanDemark, NL. Secretion rates and chemical composition of oviduct and uterine fluids in rabbits. J Anim Sci. 1971;33:829–835. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1971.334829x CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Iritani, A, Sato, E, Nishikawa, Y. Secretion rates and chemical composition of oviduct and uterine fluids in sows. J Anim Sci. 1974;39:582–588. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1974.393582x Google Scholar

Kastrop, PMM, de Graaf-Miltenburg, LAM, Gutknecht, DR, Weima, SM. Microbial contamination of embryo cultures in an ART laboratory: sources and management. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2243–2248. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem165 Google Scholar

Kattal, N, Cohen, J, Barmat, LI. Role of coculture in human in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1349 Google Scholar

Keith, B, Simon, MC. Hypoxia-inducible factors, stem cells, and cancer. Cell. 2007;129:465–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.019 Google Scholar

Kirkegaard, K, Hindkjaer, JJ, Ingerslev, HJ. Effect of oxygen concentration on human embryo development evaluated by time-lapse monitoring. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:738–744.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.028 Google Scholar

Kleijkers, SHM, Eijssen, LMT, Coonen, E, et al. Differences in gene expression profiles between human preimplantation embryos cultured in two different IVF culture media. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2303–2311. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev179 Google Scholar

Kleijkers, SHM, Mantikou, E, Slappendel, E, et al. Influence of embryo culture medium (G5 and HTF) on pregnancy and perinatal outcome after IVF: a multicenter RCT. Hum Reprod. 2016a;31:2219–2230. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew156 Google Scholar

Kleijkers, SHM, Van Montfoort, APA, Bekers, O, et al. Ammonium accumulation in commercially available embryo culture media and protein supplements during storage at 2–8°C and during incubation at 37°C. Hum Reprod. 2016b;31:1192–1199. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew059 Google Scholar

Koedooder, R, Mackens, S, Budding, A, et al. Identification and evaluation of the microbiome in the female and male reproductive tracts. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25, 298–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmy048 Google Scholar

Lewis, WH, Gregory, PW. Cinematographs of living developing rabbit-eggs 1. Science. 1929;69:226–229. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.69.1782.226-a Google Scholar

Lewis, N, Sturmey, RG. Embryo metabolism: what does it really mean? Anim Reprod. 2015;12, 521–528.Google Scholar

Lippes, J, Enders, RG, Pragay, DA, Bartholomew, WR. The collection and analysis of human fallopian tubal fluid. Contraception. 1972;5:85–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-7824(72)90021-2 Google Scholar

Lopata, A, Patullo, MJ, Chang, A, James, B. A method for collecting motile spermatozoa from human semen. Fertil Steril. 1976;27:677–684. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)41899-6Google Scholar

Macklon, NS, Pieters, MHEC, Hassan, MA, Jeucken, PHM, Eijkemans, MJC, Fauser, BCJM. A prospective randomized comparison of sequential versus monoculture systems for in-vitro human blastocyst development. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2700–2705.Google Scholar

Magli, MC, Gianaroli, L, Fiorentino, A, Ferraretti, AP, Fortini, D, Panzella, S. Fertilization and early embryology: improved cleavage rate of human embryos cultured in antibiotic-free medium. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1520–1524. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019430 Google Scholar

Mantikou, E, Bontekoe, S, van Wely, M, Seshadri, S, Repping, S, Mastenbroek, S. Low oxygen concentrations for embryo culture in assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod Update 2012;19:209. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms055.Google Scholar

Mantikou, E, Jonker, MJ, Wong, KM, et al. Factors affecting the gene expression of in vitro cultured human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:298–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev306 Google Scholar

McLaren, A, Biggers, JD. Successful development and birth of mice cultivated in vitro as early embryos. Nature, 1958;182:877–878. https://doi.org/10.1038/182877a0 Google Scholar

Ménézo, Y. Synthetic medium for gamete survival and maturation and for culture of fertilized eggs[in French]. C R Acad Hebd Seances Acad Sci D. 1976;282:1967–1970.Google Scholar

Ménézo, Y, Lichtblau, I, Elder, K. New insights into human pre-implantation metabolism in vivo and in vitro. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:293–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815–013-9953-9 Google Scholar

Ménézo, Y, Testart, J, Perrone, D. Serum is not necessary in human in vitro fertilization, early embryo culture, and transfer. Fertil Steril. 1984;42:750–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015–0282(16)48202-6 Google Scholar

Moessner, J, Dodson, WC. The quality of human embryo growth is improved when embryos are cultured in groups rather than separately. Fertil Steril. 1995; 64:1034–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015–0282(16)57925-4 Google Scholar

Morbeck, DE, Baumann, NA, Oglesbee, D. Composition of single-step media used for human embryo culture. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:1055–1060.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.007 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Morbeck, DE, Krisher, RL, Herrick, JR, Baumann, NA, Matern, D, Moyer, T. Composition of commercial media used for human embryo culture. Fertil Steril. 2014a;102:759–766.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.043 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Morbeck, DE, Paczkowski, M, Fredrickson, JR, et al. Composition of protein supplements used for human embryo culture. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014b;31:1703–1711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815–014-0349-2 Google Scholar

Morgan, A, Babu, D, Reiz, B, Whittal, R, Suh, LYK, Siraki, AG. Caution for the routine use of phenol red – It is more than just a pH indicator. Chem Biol Interact. 2019;310:108739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2019.108739 Google Scholar

Orsi, NM, Leese, HJ. Ammonium exposure and pyruvate affect the amino acid metabolism of bovine blastocysts in vitro. Reproduction. 2004;127:131–140. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00031 Google Scholar

Paternot, G, Debrock, S, D’Hooghe, TM, Spiessens, C. Early embryo development in a sequential versus single medium: a randomized study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:83. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-83 Google Scholar

Quinn, P, Kerin, JF, Warnes, GM. Improved pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization with the use of a medium based on the composition of human tubal fluid. Fertil Steril. 1985;44:493–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015–0282(16)48918-1 Google Scholar

Restall, BJ. The fallopian tube of the sheep. I. Cannulation of the fallopian tube. Aust J Biol Sci. 1966;19:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1071/bi9660181 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Restall, BJ, Wales, RG. The fallopian tube of the sheep. III. The chemical composition of the fluid from the fallopian tube. Aust J Biol Sci. 1966;19:687–698.Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Wallberg, KA, Munding, B, Ziebe, S, Robertson, SA. GM-CSF does not rescue poor-quality embryos: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gyn Obstet. 2020;301:1341–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404–020-05532-3 Google Scholar

Shao, WJ, Tao, LY, Xie, JY, Gao, C, Hu, JH, Zhao, RQ. Exposure of preimplantation embryos to insulin alters expression of imprinted genes. Comp Med. 2007;57:482–486.Google Scholar

Sinclair, KD, Young, LE, Wilmut, I, McEvoy, TG. In-utero overgrowth in ruminants following embryo culture: lessons from mice and a warning to men. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(Suppl 5):68-86.Google Scholar

Sjöblom, C, Wikland, M, Robertson, SA. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes human blastocyst development in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:3069–3076. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.12.3069 Google Scholar

Steptoe, PC, Edwards, RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;312:366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(78)92957-4 Google Scholar

Summers, MC, Bird, S, Mirzai, FM, Thornhill, A, Biggers, JD. Human preimplantation embryo development in vitro: a morphological assessment of sibling zygotes cultured in a single medium or in sequential media. Hum Fertil. 2013;16:278–285. https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2013.806823 Google Scholar

Sunde, A, Brison, D, Dumoulin, J, et al. Time to take human embryo culture seriously. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2174–2780. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew157 Google Scholar

Tarahomi, M, Vaz, FM, Straalen, J, et al. The composition of human preimplantation embryo culture media and their stability during storage and culture. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:1450–1461. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez102 Google Scholar

Tay, JI, Rutherford, AJ, Killick, SR, Maguiness, SD, Partridge, RJ, Leese, HJ. Human tubal fluid: production, nutrient composition and response to adrenergic agents. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2451–2456. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.11.2451 Google Scholar

Tervit, HR, Whittingham, DG, Rowson, LE. Successful culture in vitro of sheep and cattle ova. J Reprod Fertil. 1972;30:493–497. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0300493 Google Scholar

Van Montfoort, APA, Arts, EGJM, Wijnandts, L, et al. Reduced oxygen concentration during human IVF culture improves embryo utilization and cumulative pregnancy rates per cycle. Hum Reprod Open. 2020:hoz036. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz036 Google Scholar

Virant-Klun, I, Tomaževič, T, Vrtačnik-Bokal, E, Vogler, A, Krsnik, M, Meden-Vrtovec, H. Increased ammonium in culture medium reduces the development of human embryos to the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:526–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.10.018 CrossRef Google Scholar

Wale, PL, Gardner, DK. The effects of chemical and physical factors on mammalian embryo culture and their importance for the practice of assisted human reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22: 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv034 Google Scholar

Whitten, WK. Culture of tubal mouse ova. Nature. 1956;177:96. https://doi.org/10.1038/177096a0 Google Scholar

Whittingham, DG. Fertilization of mouse eggs in vitro. Nature, 1968;220:592–593. https://doi.org/10.1038/220592a0 Google Scholar

Wydooghe, E, Vaele, L, Piepers, S, et al. Individual commitment to a group effect: strengths and weaknesses of Bovine embryo group culture. Reproduction. 2014;148:519–529. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-14-0213 Google Scholar

Wydooghe, E, Vandaele, L, Heras, S, et al. Autocrine embryotropins revisited: how do embryos communicate with each other in vitro when cultured in groups? Biol Rev. 2017;92:505–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12241 Google Scholar

Young, LE, Sinclair, KD, Wilmut, I. Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep. Rev Reprod. 1998;3:155–163. doi: 10.1530/ror.0.0030155. PMID: 9829550Google Scholar

Youssef, MMA, Mantikou, E, van Wely, M, et al. Culture media for human pre-implantation embryos in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;20(11):CD007876.Google Scholar

Zhu, J, Li, M, Chen, L, Liu, P, Qiao, J. The protein source in embryo culture media influences birthweight: a comparative study between G1 v5 and G1-PLUS v5. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1387–1392. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu103 Google Scholar

Ziebe, S, Loft, A, Povlsen, BB, et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in embryo culture medium for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1600–1609.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.043 Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.