Non-welfarism in the Early Debates over the Coase Theorem

doi:10.1017/9781108882507.010

9 - Non-welfarism in the Early Debates over the Coase Theorem

The Case of Environmental Economics*

from Part II - Developing Modern Welfare Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 March 2021

Steven G. Medema

Edited by

Roger E. Backhouse ,

Antoinette Baujard and

Tamotsu Nishizawa

Show author details

Roger E. Backhouse: Affiliation:
University of Birmingham and Erasmus University Rotterdam
Antoinette Baujard: Affiliation:
Université de Lyon et Université Jean Monnet à Saint-Étienne
Tamotsu Nishizawa: Affiliation:
Teikyo University Japan

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Though economists typically eschewed non-welfarist arguments in the post-WWII period, there is at least one prominent instance in which such arguments were very much in play, both directly and as underpinnings for welfare-related arguments: The debate over the Coase theorem. This debate saw the Coase theorem regularly challenged on both welfarist (efficiency) and non-welfarist grounds. This then raises the question of what it was about the Coase theorem that led economists into this non-welfarist territory. This essay revisits the early debates over the Coase theorem, where non-welfarist arguments featured prominently, in order to bring out the nature of those arguments and attempt to understand the rationale(s) for their deployment. As we shall see, this move was a function of forces internal and external to economics, including the environmental turn in society and the profession, a concern with issues of fairness and equity in the evaluation of how to resolve externality problems, and a view, prominent in certain quarters, that the environment and environmental preservation is an end in itself.

Keywords

Environmental economics externalities pollution Coase theorem efficiency welfare non-welfarism fairness Pigou

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Welfare Theory, Public Action, and Ethical Values
Revisiting the History of Welfare Economics
, pp. 208 - 231

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108882507.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baumol, William J. 1972. “On Taxation and the Control of Externalities.” American Economic Review 62–3, 307–322.Google Scholar

Bensusan-Butt, D. M. 1974. “Political Economy for Aesthetes.” Australian Economic Papers 13–23, 178–187.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bertrand, Elodie. 2010. “The Three Uses of the ‘Coase Theorem’ in Coase’s Works.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17–4, 975–1000.Google Scholar

Bertrand, Elodie 2018. “George Stigler: The First Apostle of the Coase Theorem.” In Understanding the Enigmatic George Stigler: Extending Price Theory in Economics and Beyond, edited by Freedman, Craig. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 445–475.Google Scholar

Boll-De Kock, Suzan. 1976. “A Critical View on Liability Rules in Theory and Practice: The Belgian Case.” Recherches Économiques de Louvain / Louvain Economic Review 42–1, 23–36.Google Scholar

Bromley, Daniel W. 1978. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Environmental Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 12–1, 43–60.Google Scholar

Bromley, Daniel W. 1990. “The Ideology of Efficiency: Searching for a Theory of Policy Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19–1, 86–107.CrossRef Google Scholar

Buchanan, James M. and Stubblebine, Wm. Craig. 1962. “Externality.” Economica 29–116, 371–384.Google Scholar

Burrows, Paul. 1970. “On External Costs and the Visible Arm of the Law.” Oxford Economic Papers 22–1, 39–56.CrossRef Google Scholar

Calabresi, Guido. 1970. The Cost of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Chisholm, Tony, Walsh, Cliff, and Brennan, Geoffrey. 1974. “Pollution and Resource Allocation.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 18–1, 1–21.CrossRef Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3–1, 1–44.Google Scholar

Common, Michael. 1988. Environmental and Resource Economics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Commons, John R. 1924. Legal Foundations of Capitalism. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cooter, Robert D. 1987. “Torts as the Union of Liberty and Efficiency: An Essay on Causation.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 63, 523–551.Google Scholar

Demsetz, Harold. 1964. “The Exchange and Enforcement of Property Rights.” Journal of Law and Economics 7–1, 11–26.CrossRef Google Scholar

Demsetz, Harold 1968. “The Cost of Transacting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 82–1, 33–53.Google Scholar

Dick, Daniel T. 1974. Pollution, Congestion and Nuisance. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Dick, Daniel T. 1976. “The Voluntary Approach to Externality Problems: A Survey of the Critics.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2–3, 185–195.Google Scholar

Edel, Matthew. 1973. Economics and the Environment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Fisher, Anthony C. and Peterson, Frederick M.. 1976. “The Environment in Economics: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 14–1, 1–33.Google Scholar

Fiss, Owen M. 1986. “Death of the Law.” Cornell Law Review 72–1, 1–15.Google Scholar

Head, John G. 1974. “Public Policies and Pollution Problems.” FinanzArchiv / Public Finance Analysis 33–1, 1–29.Google Scholar

Helm, Dieter. 2005. “Economic Instruments and Environmental Policy.” Economic and Social Review 36–3, 205–228.Google Scholar

Hohfeld, Wesley. 1913. “Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning.” Yale Law Journal 23–1, 16–59.Google Scholar

Horner, Gerald L. 1975. “Internalizing Agricultural Nitrogen Pollution Externalities: A Case Study.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57–1, 33–39.Google Scholar

Kaplow, Louis and Shavell, Steven. 2003. “Fairness versus Welfare: Notes on the Pareto Principle, Preferences, and Distributive Justice.” Journal of Legal Studies 32–1, 331–362.Google Scholar

Kapp, K. William. 1950. The Social Costs of Private Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kneese, Allen V. 1964. The Economics of Regional Water Quality Management. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A.. 1983. “Causation in Tort Law: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Legal Studies 12–1, 109–134.Google Scholar

Liebhafsky, H. H. 1973. “The Problem of Social Cost: An Alternative Approach.” Natural Resources Journal 13–4, 615–676.Google Scholar

Lowry, S. Todd. 1976. “Bargain and Contract Theory in Law and Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 10–1, 1–22.Google Scholar

Marciano, Alain. 2018. “Why Is ‘Stigler’s Coase Theorem’ Stiglerian? A Methodological Explanation.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 36A, 127–155.CrossRef Google Scholar

Medema, Steven G. 1996. “Of Pangloss, Pigouvians, and Pragmatism: Ronald Coase on Social Cost Analysis.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18–1, 96–114.Google Scholar

Medema, Steven G. 2011. “A Case of Mistaken Identity: George Stigler, ‘The Problem of Social Cost,’ and the Coase Theorem.” European Journal of Law and Economics 31–1, 11–38.Google Scholar

Medema, Steven G. 2014. “The Curious Treatment of the Coase Theorem in Environmental Economics, 1960–1979.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 8–1, 39–57.Google Scholar

Medema, Steven G. 2015. “How Textbooks Create Knowledge and Meaning: The Case of the ‘Coase Theorem’ in Intermediate Microeconomics, 1960–1979.” Working Paper, University of Colorado Denver.Google Scholar

Medema, Steven G. 2020. “‘Exceptional and Unimportant’? Externalities, Competitive Equilibrium, and the Myth of a Pigovian Tradition.” History of Political Economy 52–1, 135–170.Google Scholar

Milliman, Jerome W. 1962. “Can People Be Trusted with Natural Resources?” Land Economics 38–3, 199–218.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. 1965. “Reflections on Recent Developments in the Concept of External Effects.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science / Revue Canadienne d’Economique et de Science Politique 31–1, 3–34.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. 1967a. The Costs of Economic Growth. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. 1967b. “Pareto Optimality and the Law.” Oxford Economic Papers 19–3, 255–287.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. 1971a. “Pangloss on Pollution.” Swedish Journal of Economics 73–1, 113–120.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. 1971b. “The Postwar Literature on Externalities: An Interpretative Essay.” Journal of Economic Literature 9–1, 1–28.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. 1974. “What Is the Optimal Level of Pollution?” Journal of Political Economy 82–6, 1287–1299.CrossRef Google Scholar

Papandreou, Andreas A. 1994. Externality and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Parish, Ross M. 1972. “Economic Aspects of Pollution Control.” Australian Economic Papers 11–18, 32–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pearce, David W. 1976. Environmental Economics. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Pigou, A. C. 1920. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 1973. Economic Analysis of Law. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Randall, Alan. 1971. “Market Solutions to Externality Problems: Theory and Practice.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 53–5, 867.Google Scholar

Randall, Alan 1972a. “Market Solutions to Externality Problems: Theory and Practice.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 54–2, 175–183.Google Scholar

Randall, Alan 1972b. On the Theory of Market Solutions to Externality Problems. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Agricultural Experiment Station Special Report 351.Google Scholar

Randall, Alan 1974. “Coasian Externality Theory in a Policy Context.” Natural Resources Journal 14–1, 35–54.Google Scholar

Randall, Alan 1975. “Property Rights and Social Microeconomics.” Natural Resources Journal 15–4, 729–747.Google Scholar

Randall, Alan 1978. “Property Institutions and Economic Behavior.” Journal of Economic Issues 12–1, 1–21.Google Scholar

Reynolds, Lloyd G. 1973. Microeconomic Analysis and Policy. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar

Samuels, Warren J. 1972. “Welfare Economics, Power, and Property.” In Perspectives of Property, edited by Wunderlich, G. and Gilson, W. L.. University Park, PA: Institute for Research on Land and Water Resources, 61–127. Reprinted in Warren J. Samuels and A. Allen Schmid, eds., Law and Economics: An Institutionalist Perspective. Boston, MA: Nijhoff, 1981, pp. 9–75.Google Scholar

Samuels, Warren J. 1974. “The Coase Theorem and the Study of Law and Economics.” Natural Resources Journal 14–1, 1–33.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. 1979. “Utilitarianism and Welfarism.” Journal of Philosophy 76–9, 463–489.Google Scholar

Stigler, George J. 1966. The Theory of Price, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Thompson, Donald N. 1973. The Economics of Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.Google Scholar

Tollison, Robert D. and Wagner, Richard E.. 1988. Smoking and the State: Social Costs, Rent Seeking, and Public Policy. Lexington, MD: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar

Weld, John. 1973. “Coase, Social Cost and Stability: An Integrative Essay.” Natural Resources Journal 13–4, 595–613.Google Scholar

Wellisz, Stanislaw. 1964. “On External Diseconomies and the Government-Assisted Invisible Hand.” Economica 31–124, 345–362.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.