Introduction
Why Study Mathematical Commentaries?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 June 2022
Summary
Strictly speaking, this book is not about the history of mathematics, except indirectly. Rather, it is devoted to commentaries, a specific textual form that many practitioners of mathematics, like other scholars active in a variety of other domains, have sometimes chosen in order to carry out their inquiries. To the modern reader, commentaries might look like a rather odd phenomenon: but until early modern times, for an author to write a commentary on a base text of any sort was quite a common choice of genre, and the practice has certainly not disappeared in our own age. By “commentary,” here, we do not mean merely the activity of jotting down one’s thoughts for oneself while reading a text or afterwards, but, instead, deciding to compose not only for oneself but above all for other readers (known and unknown students, colleagues, and others) a kind of text that complies with a base text but remains ancillary to it.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Mathematical Commentaries in the Ancient WorldA Global Perspective, pp. 1 - 50Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Asper, M. (2019) ‘Personae at play. “Men of Mathematics” in commentary’, in On Mathemata: Commenting on Greek and Arabic Mathematical Texts, eds. Sialaros, M., Christianidis, J. and Megremi, A.. Special Issue of Historia Mathematica 47, 1–3: 4–15.Google Scholar
Assmann, J., and Gladigow, B. (eds.) (1995) Text und Kommentar. Archäologie der Literarischen Kommunikation IV. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Ausejo, E., and Hormigon, M. (eds.) (1993) Messengers of Mathematics: European Mathematical Journals, 1800–1946. Madrid: Siglo XXI de Espana.Google Scholar
Barberousse, A., and Pinon, L. (eds.) (2003) Écriture scientifique. Special issue of Genesis (Manuscrits-Recherche-Invention).Google Scholar
Belhoste, B. (1998) ‘Pour une réévaluation du rôle de l’enseignement dans l’histoire des mathématiques’, Revue d’histoire des mathématiques 4: 289–304.Google Scholar
Biérëzkina, E. I. (1957) ‘Matiématika v diéviati knigakh (Mathematics in Nine Books). Annotated translation of The Nine Chapters on Mathematical Procedures’, Istoriko-Matiématitchiéskiié Issliédovaniia (Studies in the History of Mathematics) 10: 439–584.Google Scholar
Blair, A., and Milligan, J. (eds.) (2007) Toward a Cultural History of Archives. Archival Science: International Journal on Recorded Information. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Brentjes, S. (2019) ‘Mathematical commentaries in Arabic and Persian – purposes, forms, and styles’, in On Mathemata: Commenting on Greek and Arabic Mathematical Texts, eds. Sialaros, M., Christianidis, J., and Megremi, A.. Special Issue of Historia Mathematica 47, 1–3: 54–66.Google Scholar
Bretelle-Establet, F. (2015) ‘The issue of textual genres in the medical literature produced in Late Imperial China’, in Texts, Textual Acts and the History of Science, eds. Chemla, Karine and Virbel, Jacques. Dordrecht: Springer: 87–142.Google Scholar
Bretelle-Establet, F. (ed.) Looking at It from Asia: The Processes That Shaped the Sources of History of Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.Google Scholar
Chan, A. K. L. (1991) Two Visions of the Way. A Study of the Wang Pi and the Ho-shang Kung Commentaries on the Lao-Tzu. Book series: SUNY Series in Chinese Philosophy and Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Chemla, K. (1999). ‘Philosophical reflections in Chinese ancient mathematical texts: Liu Hui’s reference to the Yijing’, in Current Perspectives in the History of Science in East Asia, eds. Yung, Sik KIM and Bray, F.. Seoul: Seoul National University Press: 89–100.Google Scholar
Chemla, K. (ed.) (2004) History of Science, History of Text. Book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 238. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Chemla, K. (2005a) ‘The interplay between proof and algorithm in 3rd century China: the operation as prescription of computation and the operation as argument’, in Visualization, Explanation and Reasoning Styles in Mathematics, eds. Mancosu, P., Jorgensen, K. F. and Pedersen, S. A.. Dordrecht: Springer: 123–145.Google Scholar
Chemla, K. (2005b) ‘Geometrical figures and generality in ancient China and beyond: Liu Hui and Zhao Shuang, Plato and Thabit ibn Qurra’, Science in Context 18, no. 1: 123–166.Google Scholar
Chemla, K. (2008a) ‘Antiquity in the shape of a canon. Views on antiquity from the outlook of mathematics’, in Perceptions of Antiquity in Chinese Civilization, eds. Kuhn, D. and Stahl, H.. Heidelberg: Edition Forum: 191–208.Google Scholar
Chemla, K. (2008b) Classic and Commentary: An Outlook Based on Mathematical Sources. Preprint / Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte 344. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte.Google Scholar
Chemla, K. (2010) ‘Changes and continuities in the use of diagrams tu in Chinese mathematical writings (3rd century–14th century) [I]’, East Asian Science, Technology, and Society. An International Journal 4: 303–326.Google Scholar
Chemla, K. (2015) ‘Describing texts for algorithms: how they prescribe operations and integrate cases. Reflections based on ancient Chinese mathematical sources’, in Texts, Textual Acts and the History of Science, eds. Chemla, K. and Virbel, J.. Dordrecht, Springer: 317–384.Google Scholar
Chemla, K., and Shuchun, GUO. (2004) Les Neuf chapitres. Le classique mathématique de la Chine ancienne et ses commentaires. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Chemla, K., and Virbel, J. (eds.) (2015) Texts, Textual Acts and the History of Science, Archimedes. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Christianidis, J., and Megremi, A. (2019) ‘Tracing the early history of algebra: Testimonies on Diophantus in the Greek-speaking world (4th–7th century CE)’, in On Mathemata: Commenting on Greek and Arabic Mathematical Texts, eds. Sialaros, M., Christianidis, J. and Megremi, A.. Special Issue of Historia Mathematica 47, 1–3: 16–38.Google Scholar
Colebrooke, H. T. (1817) Algebra, with Arithmetic and Mensuration from the Sanscrit of Brahmegupta and Bhascara, Translated by. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Csiszar, A. (2018) Authorship and the Politics of Knowledge in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Daston, L. (ed.) (2017) Science in the Archives: Pasts, Presents, Futures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dayeh, I. (ed.) (2018) Commentary Cultures: Technologies of Medieval Reading. Special issue of Philological Encounters 3.Google Scholar
De Young, G. (2019) ‘The commentator’s craft: Building a mathematical commentary from quotations’, in On Mathemata: Commenting on Greek and Arabic Mathematical Texts, eds. Sialaros, M., Christianidis, J., and Megremi, A.. Special Issue of Historia Mathematica 47, 1–3: 67–86.Google Scholar
Decorps, M. (1998) ‘Eutocius d’Ascalon éditeur du traité des Coniques d’Apollonios de Pergé et l’exigence de “clarté”: un exemple des pratiques exégétiques et critiques des héritiers de la science alexandrine’, in Sciences exactes et sciences appliquées à Alexandrie, eds. Argoud, G. and Guillaumin, J.-Y.. Saint-Étienne: Publications de l’université de Saint-Étienne: 87–101.Google Scholar
Delire, J.-M. (2016) Les mathématiques de l’Autel Védique. Le Baudhāyana Śulbasūtra et son commentaire Śulbadīpikā. Édition critique, traduction et commentaire. Book series: Hautes études orientales. Genève: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Despeaux, S. (2002) ‘The development of a publication community: nineteenth-century mathematics in British scientific journals’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Ehrhardt, C. (2008) ‘Evariste Galois, un candidat à l’école préparatoire en 1829’, Revue d’histoire des mathématiques 14: 289–328.Google Scholar
Frahm, E. (2011) Babylonian and Assyrian Text Commentaries: Origins of Interpretation. Book series: Guides to the Mesopotamian Textual Record 5. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Frahm, E. (2004) ‘Royal hermeneutics: observations on the commentaries from Ashurbanipal’s libraries at Nineveh’, Iraq 66: 45–50.Google Scholar
Freschi, E. (2018) ‘Commenting by weaving together texts: Veṅkaṭanātha’s Seśvaramīmāṃsā and the Sanskrit philosophical commentaries’, Commentary Cultures: Technologies of Medieval Reading. Special issue of Philological Encounters 3: 337–358.Google Scholar
Ganeri, J. (ed.) (2017) The Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K., and Shuttleworth Kraus, C. (eds.) (2002) The Classical Commentary. Histories, Practices, Theory. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, A., and Most, G. (eds.) (2016) Canonical Texts and Scholarly Practices: A Comparative Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. B. (1991) Scripture, Canon and Commentary. A Comparison of Confucian and Western Exegesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, A. (1999) ‘Uses and users of astronomical commentaries in Antiquity’, in Commentaries – Kommentare, ed. Most, G. W.. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht: 147–172.Google Scholar
Kaiser, D. (ed.) (2005) Pedagogy and the Practice of Science. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kawahara, H. 川原秀城. (1980) ‘Ryûki chû Kyûshô sanjutsu (Liu Hui’s commentary on The Nine Chapters) 劉徽注九章算術’, In Chôgoku Tenmon Gaku Sûgaku Shû 中國天文學、數學集 (Collection of Chinese Astronomical and Mathematical texts). Tôkyô: Asahi shuppansha 東京朝日出版社: 75–264.Google Scholar
Keller, A. (2005) ‘Making diagrams speak, in Bhāskara I’s commentary on the Āryabhaṭīya’, Historia Mathematica 32: 275–302.Google Scholar
Keller, A. (2006) Expounding the Mathematical Seed, Bhâskara and the Mathematical Chapter of the Āryabhatîya. 2 vols. Basel: Birkhauser.Google Scholar
Keller, A. (2010) ‘On Sanskrit commentaries dealing with mathematics (fifth–twelfth century)’, in Looking at It from Asia: The Processes that Shaped the Sources of History of Science, ed. Bretelle-Establet, F.. Dordrecht: Springer: 211–244.Google Scholar
Knorr, W. R. (1996) ‘The wrong text of Euclid: on Heiberg’s text and its alternatives’, Centaurus: International Magazine of the History of Mathematics, Science, and Technology 38: 208–276.Google Scholar
Makeham, J. (2003) Transmitters and Creators. Chinese Commentators and Commentaries on the Analects. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1998) Prolegomena Mathematica: From Apollonius of Perga to Late Neoplatonism with an Appendix on Pappus and the History of Platonism. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (ed.) (1997) Collecting Fragments – Fragmente Sammeln. Aporemata: Kritische Studien zur Philologiegeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (ed.) (1999) Commentaries – Kommentare. Aporemata: Kritische Studien zur Philologiegeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (1998) ‘Deuteronomic texts: late antiquity and the history of mathematics’, Revue d’histoire des mathématiques, 4: 261–288.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (1999) The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (2004) ‘The limits of text in Greek mathematics’, in History of Science, History of Text, ed. Chemla, K.. Dordrecht: Springer: 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oaks, J. (2019) ‘Proofs and algebra in al-Fārisī’s commentary’, in On Mathemata: Commenting on Greek and Arabic Mathematical Texts, eds. Sialaros, M., Christianidis, J., and Megremi, A.. Special Issue of Historia Mathematica 47, 1–3: 106–121.Google Scholar
Olesko, K. M. (1991) Physics as a Calling: Discipline and Practice in the Königsberg Seminar for Physics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Patte, F. (2004) BHĀSKARĀCĀRYA, Le Siddhāntaśiromaṇi, I–II: l’Œuvre mathématique et astronomique de Bhāskarācārya. Édition, traduction et commentaire par François PATTE. Vol. 1: Texte; Vol. II: Traduction. Book series: EPHE, Sciences historiques et philologiques, II: Hautes Études Orientales 38, Extrême-Orient 4. Genève: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Paavilainen, H. (2009) Medieval Pharmacotherapy – Continuity and Change. Case Studies from Ibn Sīnā and Some of His Late Medieval Commentators. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Peiffer, J., Conforti, M., and Delpiano, P. (eds.) (2013) L’Europe des journaux savants (xviie–xviiie siècles). Communication et construction des savoirs / Scholarly journals in early modern Europe. Communication and the construction of knowledge. Special Issue of Archives internationales d’histoire des science 170–171, vol. 63. Turnhout: Brépols.Google Scholar
Pormann, P., and Karimullah, I. K. (eds.) (2017) The Arabic Commentaries on the Hippocratic Aphorisms. Special Issue of Oriens 45, 1–2. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Proust, C. (2015) ‘A tree-structured list in a mathematical series text from Mesopotamia’, in Texts, Textual Acts and the History of Science, eds. Chemla, K. and Virbel, J.. Dordrecht: Springer: 281–316.Google Scholar
Raible, W. (1995) ‘Arten des Kommentierens – Arten der Sinnbildung – Arten des Verstehens’, in Text und Kommentar. Archäologie der Literarischen Kommunikation IV, eds. Assmann, J. and Gladigow, B.. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag: 51–73.Google Scholar
Rebstock, U. (1990) ‘Arabic mathematical manuscripts in Mauretania’, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 53: 429–441.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, I. (2011) ‘Vox and oratio in early twelfth century grammar and dialectics’, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 78, 1: 47–129.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2006) ‘A preliminary study in the critical assessment of diagrams in Greek mathematical works’, SCIAMVS 7: 81–144.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2019) ‘Re-examination of the different origins of the arithmetical books of Euclid’s Elements’, in On Mathemata: Commenting on Greek and Arabic Mathematical Texts, eds. Sialaros, M., Christianidis, J. and Megremi, A.. Special Issue of Historia Mathematica 47, 1–3: 39–53.Google Scholar
Kangshen, Shen, Crossley, J. N., and Lun, A. W.-C. (1999) The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art. Companion and Commentary. Oxford & Beijing: Oxford University Press & Science Press.Google Scholar
Shukla, K. S., (as in Studies in Indian Maths and Astronomy, May 2019) (1976) Āryabhaṭīya of Āryabhaṭa, with the Commentary of Bhāskara I and Somesvara, Critically Edited with Introduction and Appendices. New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy (INSA).Google Scholar
Sialaros, M., Christianidis, J., and Megremi, A. (2019a) ‘Editorial note’, in On Mathemata: Commenting on Greek and Arabic Mathematical Texts, eds. Sialaros, M., Christianidis, J., and Megremi, A.. Special Issue of Historia Mathematica 47, 1–3: 1–3.Google Scholar
Sialaros, M., Christianidis, J., and Megremi, A. (eds.) (2019b) On Mathemata: Commenting on Greek and Arabic Mathematical Texts. Special Issue of Historia Mathematica 47, 1–3: 1–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirat, C. (1983) La philosophie juive au Moyen Âge selon les textes manuscrits et imprimés, Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (ed.) (1990) Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (ed.) (2004a) The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: A Sourcebook. Vol. 1: Psychology. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (ed.) (2004b) The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: A Sourcebook. Vol. 2: Physics. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (ed.) (2004c) The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: A Sourcebook. Vol. 3: Logic and Metaphysics. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co.Google Scholar
Unschuld, P., Tessenow, H., in collaboration with Zheng Jinsheng (2011). Huang Di nei jing su wen. An Annotated Translation of Huang Di’s Inner Classic – Basic Questions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Verdier, N. (2009 (June 25) ‘Le Journal de Liouville et la presse de son temps: une entreprise d’édition et de circulation des mathématiques au XIXe siècle (1824–1885)’, Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Paris-Sud 11.Google Scholar
Vogel, K. (1968) Neun Bücher arithmetischer Technik. Braunschweig: Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn.Google Scholar
Volkov, A. (2012) ‘Argumentation for state examinations: demonstration in traditional Chinese and Vietnamese mathematics’, in The History of Mathematical Proof in Ancient Traditions, ed. Chemla, K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 509–551.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. (2000) The Craft of a Chinese Commentator. Wang Bi on the Laozi. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. (2003) A Chinese Reading of the Daodejing. Wang Bi’s Commentary on the Laozi with Critical Text and Translation. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Walsham, A. (ed.) (2016, November) The Social History of the Archive: Record-Keeping in Early Modern Europe, Special Issue of Past and Present 230, Supplement 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, A. (2003) Masters of Theory. Cambridge and the Rise of Mathematical Physics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilden, E. (ed.) (2009) Between Preservation and Recreation: Tamil Traditions of Commentary. Proceedings of a Workshop in Honour of T.V. Gopal Iyer. Pondichéry: EFEO-IFP.Google Scholar
Yiwen, Zhu 朱一文. (Forthcoming) ‘Another culture of computation from 7th century China’, in Cultures of Computation and Quantification in the Ancient World, eds. Chemla, K., Keller, A., and Proust, C.. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Yiwen, Zhu (2016) ‘Different cultures of computation in seventh century China from the viewpoint of square root extraction’, Historia Mathematica 43: 3–25.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.