Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy
- The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Labor and Democracy: Theory and Practice
- Part II History, Politics, and Law
- 5 Sectoral Bargaining in the United States
- 6 The Lever and the Fulcrum
- 7 “Industrial Democracy” in the United States, Past and Present
- 8 Holding On
- 9 Unions and the Democratic First Amendment
- Part III Labor, Diversity, and Democracy
- Part IV Country and Regional Perspectives
- Part V Labor and Democracy Sectoral Case Studies: Platform Workers, Higher Education, and the Care Industry
- Index
- References
7 - “Industrial Democracy” in the United States, Past and Present
from Part II - History, Politics, and Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy
- The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Labor and Democracy: Theory and Practice
- Part II History, Politics, and Law
- 5 Sectoral Bargaining in the United States
- 6 The Lever and the Fulcrum
- 7 “Industrial Democracy” in the United States, Past and Present
- 8 Holding On
- 9 Unions and the Democratic First Amendment
- Part III Labor, Diversity, and Democracy
- Part IV Country and Regional Perspectives
- Part V Labor and Democracy Sectoral Case Studies: Platform Workers, Higher Education, and the Care Industry
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter first scans the historical context of the “labor question” in the United States and the radically diverse interpretations and experimentation with “industrial democracy,” widely seen as the answer.Second, it outlines how industrial democracy ultimately came to have meaning through collective bargaining, with the enactment of the 1935 National Labor Relations Act, and how optimism about the law’s promise and achievements turned into disenchantment. Third, the essay sketches the glimmerings of industrial democracy’s revival, with the labor question’s reemergence.Creative experimentation is underway, older notions are being reimagined, collective action is on the rise, and the threat posed by worker’s diminished bargaining power is a matter of public debate.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy , pp. 117 - 126Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
American Federation of Labor. 1905. Report of the Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Convention of the A.F. of L. Held at Denver, Col., Dec., 1894. Bloomington, IN: AFL.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2017. Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (And Why We Don’t Talk About It). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Blasi, Joseph R., Freeman, Richard B., and Kruse, Douglas L.. 2013. The Citizen’s Share: Reducing Inequality in the Twenty-First Century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher R. 2019. “The Suffocation of Democracy,” New York Review of Books (Oct. 25, 2019).Google Scholar
Cappelli, Peter. 1999. The New Deal At Work: Managing the Market-Driven Workforce. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Cobble, Dorothy Sue. 2011. “The Intellectual Origins of an Institutional Revolution,” ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law 26: 209.Google Scholar
Derber, Milton. 1970. The American Idea of Industrial Democracy 1865–1965. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Estlund, Cynthia L. 2002. “The Ossification of American Labor Law,” Colum. L. Rev. 102: 1531.Google Scholar
Filippelli, Ronald F., ed. 1990. Labor Conflict in the United States: An Encyclopedia. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Fraser, Steve. 1989 “The ‘Labor Question,” in Fraser, Steve, and Gerstle, Gary, eds. The Rise and Fall of the New Deal Order 1930–1980. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Richard B. 2011. “What Can We Learn from the NLRA to Create Labor Law for the Twenty-First Century?” ABA J. Lab. & Emp. L. 26: 327.Google Scholar
Gladden, William. 1876. Working People and Their Employers. Boston: Lockwood, Brooks, and Co.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Alex. 2013. “Labor Republicanism and the Transformation of Work,” Political Theory 41, 4: 591–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhouse, Steven. 2014. “VW Workers in Tennessee to Vote on Union,” The New York Times (Feb. 3, 2014), sec. B, p. 4.Google Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander. 2018. Politics at Work: How Companies Turn Their Workers Into Lobbyists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander, Kimball, William, and Kochan, Thomas. 2019. “How US Workers Think About Workplace Democracy,” Working Paper, MIT Sloan School of Management.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Barry. 2007. “Sluggish Institutions in a Dynamic World: Can Unions and Industrial Competition Coexist?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Fall 2007.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Sanford M. 1997. Modern Manors: Welfare Capitalism Since the New Deal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Bruce. 1998. “Does the NLRA Constrain Employee Involvement and Participation Programs in Non-Union Companies? A Reassessment,” Yale L. & Pol’y Rev. 17: 729.Google Scholar
Leuchtenburg, William E. 1963. Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
McCartin, Joseph A. 1988. Labor’s Great War: The Struggle for Industrial Democracy and the Origins of Modern American Labor Relations, 1912–1921. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Muller-Jentsch, Walther. 2008. “Industrial Democracy: Historical Development and Current Challenges,” Management Revue 19, 4: 261–262.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center, 2018. “More Americans View Long-Term Decline in Union Membership Negatively than Positively” (June 5, 2018).Google Scholar
Powderly, Terence. 1890. Thirty Years of Labor: 1859 to 1889. Columbus, OH: Excelsior Publishing.Google Scholar
Reich, Robert. 2019. “US Must Return to Industrial Democracy to Restore Workers’ Rights,” San Francisco Chronicle (Feb. 1, 2019).Google Scholar
Summers, Clyde. 1979. “Industrial Democracy: America’s Unfulfilled Promise,” Clev. St. L. Rev. 28: 29.Google Scholar
US Commission on Industrial Relations. 1916. Final Report and Testimony. v. 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wakabayashi, Daisuke, and Benner, Katie. 2018. “How Google Protected Andy Rubin, the ‘Father of Android’,” The New York Times (Oct. 26, 2018), sec. A, p. 1.Google Scholar
Weil, David. 2014. The Fissured Workplace: Why Work Became So Bad For So Many and What Can Be Done to Improve It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, Paul. 1983. “Promises to Keep: Securing Workers’ Rights to Self-Organization Under the NLRA,” Harv. L. Rev. 96: 1769.Google Scholar
Weiler, Paul. 1990. Governing the Workplace. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
White, Richard. 2017. The Republic for Which It Stands: The United States during Reconstruction and The Gilded Age, 1865–1896. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. 1919. Cable to the Congress (May 20, 1919), in Link, Arthur S., ed. The Papers of Woodrow Wilson, v. 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (1988).Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.