Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions

doi:10.1017/9781108918015.032

30 - Effectiveness of Competition Law Sanctions

Portugal

from Part II - Country Reports

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2022

Nuno Castro Marques

Edited by

Tihamer Tóth

Show author details

Tihamer Tóth: Affiliation:
Pázmány Peter Catholic University (Budapest, Hungary)

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Nuno Castro Marques presents the Portuguese competition law framework. Portugal was one of those European countries opting to introduce a misdemeanour law, inspired by the German Ordnungswidrigkeit law, but this has now evolved a long way. EU and Portuguese competition laws establish the same potential sanction for all competition infringements: a fine up to 10% of the undertaking turnover. Not only companies but also natural persons may be liable for competition law infringements, and fines applicable to natural persons can go up to 10% of their annual income. Portuguese competition law is fully aligned with the European framework, with the Portuguese Competition Authority (PCA) armed with strong investigation powers, an experienced leniency regime and the full set of mechanisms for speeding up enforcement, such as the settlement or commitment procedures. The results are visible, with general deterrence also making an important contribution, and whenever the PCA adopts a sanctioning decision, especially in cartel cases, it makes front-page news. That was recently the case with a banking cartel, where fourteen banks were fined for exchanging sensitive business information and even the Parliament felt the need to openly condemn the situation in public hearings.

Keywords

Portugal Portuguese competition law Portuguese Competition Authority EU competition law competition policy antitrust

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Competition Law Sanctions , pp. 613 - 636

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108918015.032 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

ALBUQUERQUE, P. P. d. (2011). Comentário do Regime Geral das Contra-Ordenações à luz da Constituição da República e da Convenção Europeia dos Direitos do Homem. Lisbon: Universidade Católica Editora.Google Scholar

BEATON-WELLS, C. & PARKER, C. (2013). Justifying Criminal Sanctions for Cartel Conduct: A Hard Case. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 1(1), 198–219.CrossRef Google Scholar

BOLINA, H. M. (2009). O regime dos processos de contra-ordenação dos reguladores independentes. In FERREIRA, E. P., MORAIS, L. D. S. & ANASTÁCIO, G. (Eds.), Regulação em Portugal: novos tempos, novo modelo? (pp. 737–71). Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar

BRANDÃO, N. (2016). Crimes e contra-ordenações: da cisão à convergência material – ensaio para uma recompreensão da relação entre o direito penal e o direito contra-ordenacional. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.Google Scholar

BUXBAUM, H. L. (2005). German Legal Culture and the Globalization of Competition Law: A Historical Perspective on the Expansion of Private Antitrust Enforcement. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 23(2), 101–22.Google Scholar

CASTRO MARQUES, N. (2017). A Different Path to the Same Old Question: Why Should Cartels Be Criminalised? Market and Competition Law Review, 1(2), 141–76.Google Scholar

CASTRO MARQUES, N. (2019). Contributo para a Autonomia do Direito Nacional da Concorrência – em particular na criminalização dos cartéis. Porto: Universidade Católica Editora.Google Scholar

CORREIA, E. (1998). Direito penal e direito de Mera Ordenação Social. In Direito Penal Económico e Europeu: Textos Doutrinários (Vol. I, pp. 1–18). Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.Google Scholar

COSTA ANDRADE, M. d. (1998). Contributo para o conceito de contra-ordenação (a experiência Alemã). In Direito Penal Económico e Europeu: Textos Doutrinários (Vol. I, pp. 75–107). Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.Google Scholar

COSTA PINTO, F. d. L. d. (1998). O ilícito de mera ordenação social e a erosão do princípio da subsidariedade da intervenção penal. In Direito Penal Económico e Europeu: Textos Doutrinários (Vol. I, pp. 209–74). Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.Google Scholar

DANTAS, A. L. (2009). O processo das contra-ordenações na Lei n.º 50/2006. In FERREIRA, E. P., MORAIS, L. D. S. & ANASTÁCIO, G. (Eds.), Regulação em Portugal: Novos Tempos, Novo Modelo? (pp. 773–98). Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar

FARIA COSTA, J. d. (1998). A importância da recorrência no pensamento jurídico. Um exemplo: a distinção entre o ilícito penal e o ilícito de mera ordenação social. In Direito Penal Económico e Europeu: Textos Doutrinários (Vol. I, pp. 109–43). Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.Google Scholar

FEIJOO SÁNCHEZ, B. (2008). Sobre la crisis de la teoría del bien jurídico. Indret: Revista para el Análisis del Derecho 2, 1–16.Google Scholar

FIGUEIREDO DIAS, J. d. (1998). O Movimento de Descriminalização e o Ilícito de Mera Ordenação Social. In Direito Penal Económico e Europeu: Textos Doutrinários (Vol. I, pp. 19–33). Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.Google Scholar

FONTAINE CAMPOS, M. (2015). Fundamentos económicos da regulamentação internacional da concessão de ajudas públicas. Direito e Justiça, II (Estudos dedicados ao Professor Doutor Bernardo da Gama Lobo Xavier), 431–65.Google Scholar

FREEMAN, P. (2012). ‘Beware the Ides of March’–The Government’s Proposed Competition Reforms. European Competition Journal, 8(3), 563–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

FREEMAN, P. (2013). The Competition and Markets Authority: Can the Whole Be Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts? Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 1(1), 4–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

GAGEIRO, A. (2009). Modelos de direito estrangeiro na perspectiva do enforcement (E.U.A./R.U./Europa Continental). In PALMA, M. F. D., SILVA, Augusto; MENDES, Sousa, Paulo (coord.) (Eds.), Direito Sancionatório das Autoridades Reguladoras (pp. 41–74). Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.Google Scholar

GAL, M. S. (2010). Free Movement of Judgments: Increasing Deterrence of International Cartels through Jurisdictional Reliance. Virginia Journal of International Law, 51(1), 57–94.Google Scholar

GODINHO, I. F. (2017). The Criminal Offence: Definitions and Internal Structure in Portugal. In SIEBER, U., JARVERS, K. & SILVERMAN, E. (Eds.), National Criminal Law in a Comparative Legal Context (Vol. 3.2, pp. 50–58). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

GRAHAM, C. (2012). The Reform of UK Competition Policy. European Competition Journal, 8(3), 539–62.CrossRef Google Scholar

GRAY, A. (2008). Criminal Sanctions for Cartel Behaviour. Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal, 8(2), 364–79.Google Scholar

HARDING, C. (2011). Cartel Deterrence: The Search for Evidence and Argument. Antitrust Bulletin, 56(2), 345–76.CrossRef Google Scholar

HARRISON, G. & BELL, M. (2006). Recent Enhancements in Antitrust Criminal Enforcement: Bigger Sticks and Sweeter Carrots. Houston Business and Tax Law Journal, 6(2),207–40.Google Scholar

JONES, A. & WILLIAMS, R. (2014). The UK Response to the Global Effort against Cartels: Is Criminalization Really the Solution? Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 2(1), 100–125.CrossRef Google Scholar

JOSHUA, J. M. (2003). The UK’s New Cartel Offence and its Implications for EC Competition Law: A Tangled Web. European Law Review, 28(5), 620–41.Google Scholar

KOCH, F. E. (1945). Cartels as Instruments of International Economic Organization: Public and Private Legal Aspects of International Cartels. Modern Law Review, 8(3), 130–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

KOKKORIS, I. (2010). Should Crisis Cartels Exist amid Crises? Antitrust Bulletin, 55(4), 727–58.Google Scholar

KOVACIC, W. E. & HYMAN, D. A. (2012). Competition Agency Design: What’s on the Menu? European Competition Journal, 8(3), 527–38.CrossRef Google Scholar

LANDE, R. H. (1982). Wealth Transfers As the Original and Primary Concern of Antitrust: The Efficiency Interpretation Challenged. Hastings Law Journal, 34(1), 65–151.Google Scholar

LESLIE, C. R. (2006). Antitrust Damages and Deadweight Loss. Antitrust Bulletin, 51(3), 521–67.Google Scholar

LEVER, J. & PIKE, J. (2005a). Cartel Agreements, Criminal Conspiracy and the Statutory ‘Cartel Offence’ – Part 1. European Competition Law Review, 26(2), 90–97.Google Scholar

LEVER, J. & PIKE, J. (2005b). Cartel Agreements, Criminal Conspiracy and the Statutory ‘Cartel Offence’ – Part 2. European Competition Law Review, 26(3), 164–172.Google Scholar

LUMBRALES, N. B. M. (2006). Sobre o conceito material de contra-ordenação. Lisbon: Universidade Católica Editora.Google Scholar

MacCULLOCH, A. (2007). Honesty, Morality and the Cartel Offence. European Competition Law Review, 28(6), 355–63.Google Scholar

MacCULLOCH, A. (2012). The Cartel Offence: Defining an Appropriate ‘Moral Space’. European Competition Journal, 8(1), 73–93.Google Scholar

MARQUES, M. M. L. (2002). Um curso de direito da concorrência. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.Google Scholar

MÖSCHEL, W. (2011). Fines in European Competition Law. European Competition Law Review, 32(7), 369–75.Google Scholar

MOURA e SILVA, M. (2011). Anti-cartel Enforcement in Portugal: A Short Chronicle of an Uphill Struggle. European Competition Law Review, 32(1), 37–41.Google Scholar

MOUTINHO, J. L. (2008). Direito das Contra-Ordenações – Ensinar e investigar. Lisbon: Universidade Católica Editora.Google Scholar

NIKPAY, A. & TAYLOR, D. (2014). The New UK Competition Regime: Radically Different or More of the Same? Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 5(5), 278–86.CrossRef Google Scholar

O’KANE, M. (2011). Does Prison Work for Cartelists? The View from behind Bars: An Interview of Bryan Allison. Antitrust Bulletin, 56(2), 483–500.Google Scholar

OECD. (2002). Fighting Hard-core Cartels: Harm, Effective Sanctions and Leniency Programmes. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

PAIS, S. d. O. (2011). Entre inovação e concorrência – em defesa de um modelo europeu. Lisbon: Universidade Católica Editora.Google Scholar

PEDROSA MACHADO, M. (1998). Elementos para o estudo da legislação portuguesa sobre contra-ordenações. In Direito Penal Económico e Europeu: Textos Doutrinários (Vol. I, pp. 145–207). Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.Google Scholar

RILEY, A. (2010). The Modernisation of EU Anti-cartel Enforcement: Will the Commission Grasp the Opportunity? European Competition Law Review, 31(5), 191–207.Google Scholar

ROXIN, C. (2013). O conceito de bem jurídico como padrão crítico da norma penal posto à prova … Revista Portuguesa de Ciência Criminal, 23(1), 7–43.Google Scholar

SCHINKEL, M. P. (2007). Effective Cartel Enforcement in Europe. World Competition, 30(4), 539–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

SILVA PEREIRA, M. M. (2003). Bens jurídicos colectivos e bens jurídicos políticos. In COSTA ANDRADE, M. d., FARIA COSTA, J. d., MIRANDA RODRIGUES, A. & ANTUNES, M. J. (Eds.), Liber Discipulorum para Jorge de Figueiredo Dias (pp. 293–316). Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.Google Scholar

SMITH, A. (2003). A Riqueza das Nações (Ostrensky, A. A. R. e. E., Trans.). São Paulo: Livraria Martins Fontes.Google Scholar

SMITH, R. L. & KING, S. (2007). Does Competition Law Adequately Protect Consumers? European Competition Law Review, 28(7), 412–24.Google Scholar

STEPHAN, A. (2014). Four Key Challenges to the Successful Criminalization of Cartel Laws. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 2(2), 1–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

STIGLER, G. J. (1976). The Xistence of X-Efficiency. American Economic Review, 66(1), 213–16.Google Scholar

VILELA, A. (2013). O direito de mera ordenação social: entre a ideia de ‘recorrência’ e a de ‘erosão’ do direito penal clássico. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.Google Scholar

WARDHAUGH, B. (2012). The Cartel Offence within a ‘World Class’ Competition Regime: An Assessment of the BIS Consultation Exercise and Its Results. European Competition Journal, 8(3), 573–88.CrossRef Google Scholar

WERDEN, G. J. (2009). Sanctioning Cartel Activity: Let the Punishment Fit the Crime. European Competition Journal, 5(1), 19–36.Google Scholar

WERDEN, G. J., HAMMOND, S. D. & BARNETT, B. A. (2011). Deterrence and Detection of Cartels: Using All the Tools and Sanctions. Antitrust Bulletin, 56(2), 207–34.CrossRef Google Scholar

WHELAN, P. (2007). A Principled Argument for Personal Criminal Sanctions As Punishment under EC Cartel Law. The Competition Law Review, 4(1), 7–40.Google Scholar

WHELAN, P. (2012). Improving Criminal Cartel Enforcement in the UK: The Case for the Adoption of BIS’S ‘Option 4’. European Competition Journal, 8(3), 589–601.CrossRef Google Scholar

WHELAN, P. (2014). The Criminalization of European Cartel Enforcement: Theoretical, Legal, and Practical Challenges. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

WILKS, S. (2011). Institutional Reform and the Enforcement of Competition Policy in the UK. European Competition Journal, 7(1), 1–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

WILS, W. P. J. (2007). Leniency in Antitrust Enforcement: Theory and Practice. World Competition, 30(1), 25–64.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.