Aalders, G. J. D. (1986), ‘Cassius Dio and the Greek world’, Mnemosyne 39: 282–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, A. (ed.) (1928–38), Suidae Lexicon, 5 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Adler, E. (2011), ‘Cassius Dio’s Livia and the conspiracy of Cinna Magnus’, GRBS 51: 133–54.Google Scholar

Adler, E. (2012), ‘Cassius Dio’s Agrippa-Maecenas debate: an operational code analysis,’ AJPh 133: 477–520.Google Scholar

Adler, M. (1909), ‘Zur Verschwörung des Cn. Cornelius Cinna bei Seneca und Cassius Dio’, Zeitschr. österr. Gymnasien 60: 193–208.Google Scholar

Aerts, W. J. (ed.) (1990), Michaelis Pselli Historia Syntomos. Berlin.Google Scholar

Alcock, S. E. (1994), ‘Nero at play? The emperor’s Grecian Odyssey’, in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds.), Reflections of Nero: Culture, History, and Representation. London: 98–111.Google Scholar

Alexander, P. J. (ed. Abrahamse, D. de F.) (1985), The Byzantine Apocalyptic Tradition. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G. (2001), ‘Pietas immobilis erga principem und ihr Lohn: Öffentliche Ehrenmonumente von Senatoren in Rom während der Frühen und Hohen Kaiserzeit’, in Alföldy, G. and Panciera, S. (eds.), Inschriftliche Denkmäler als Medien der Selbstdarstellung in der römischen Welt. Stuttgart: 11–46.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. and Postman, L. (1947), The Psychology of Rumor. New York.Google Scholar

Almond, G. (1956), ‘Comparative political systems’, The Journal of Politics 18: 391–409.Google Scholar

Alt, K. (2006), ‘Der Daimon als Seelenführer: zur Vorstellung des persönlichen Schutzgeistes bei den Griechen’, Hypoboreus 6: 219–51.Google Scholar

Ameling, W. (1984), ‘Cassius Dio und Bithynien’, EA 4: 123–38.Google Scholar

Andersen, H. A. (1938), Cassius Dio und die Begründung des Principates. Berlin.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. G. C. (1934), ‘The eastern frontier under Augustus’, in Cook, S. A., Adcock, F. E., and Charlesworth, M. P. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. First Edition. Volume X: The Augustan Empire 44 BC–AD 70. Cambridge: 239–83.Google Scholar

Ando, C. (2016), ‘Cassius Dio on imperial legitimacy, from the Antonines to the Severans’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 567–77.Google Scholar

Appelbaum, A. (2007), ‘Another look at the assassination of Pertinax and the accession of Julianus’, CPh 102: 198–207.Google Scholar

Arafat, K. W. (1996), Pausanias’ Greece: Ancient Artists and Roman Rulers. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2007), ‘The wonderful world of Mucianus’, in Bispham, E. and Rowe, G. (eds.), Vita Vigilia Est: Essays in Honour of Barbara Levick. London: 1–17.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2016), ‘Never say die! Assassinating emperors in Suetonius’ Lives of the Caesars’, in De Temmerman, K. and Demoen, K. (eds.), Writing Biography in Greece and Rome: Narrative Technique and Fictionalization. Cambridge: 200–16.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2018a), ‘Paradoxography and marvels in post-Domitianic Literature: “An extraordinary affair, even in the hearing!”’, in König, A. and Whitton, C. (eds.), Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan, and Hadrian: Literary Interactions AD 96–138. Cambridge: 126–45.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (ed.) (2018b), Tacitus: Annals 15. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Asirvatham, S. R. (2017), ‘Historiography’, in Richter, D. S. and Johnson, W. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. Oxford: 477–92.Google Scholar

Assmann, J. (2011), Cultural Memory and Early Civilization. Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Astin, A. E. (1963), ‘Augustus and “Censoria Potestas”’, Latomus 22: 226–35.Google Scholar

Baar, M. (1990), Das Bild des Kaisers Tiberius bei Tacitus, Sueton und Cassius Dio. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, B. (1979), ‘Nero and his mother’s corpse’, Mnemosyne 32: 380–1.Google Scholar

Baldwin, B. (1986), ‘Historiography in the second century: Precursors of Dio Cassius’, Klio 68: 479–86.Google Scholar

Banchich, T. M. (ed.) (2015), The Lost History of Peter the Patrician. London and New York.Google Scholar

Banchich, T. M. and Lane, E. N. (eds.) (2009), The History of Zonaras. From Alexander Severus to the Death of Theodosius the Great. London and New York.Google Scholar

Barker, E. (1957), Social and Political Thought in Byzantium: From Justinian to the Last Palaeologus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (1974), ‘The victories of Augustus’, JRS 64: 21–6.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (1984), ‘The composition of Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, Phoenix 38: 240–55.Google Scholar

Baron, C. (2019), ‘Wrinkles in time: chronological ruptures in Cassius Dio’s narrative of the late Republic’, in Osgood, J. and Baron, C. (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic. Leiden and Boston: 50–71.Google Scholar

Barton, T. (1994), ‘The inventio of Nero: Suetonius’, in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds.), Reflections of Nero: Culture, History, and Representation. London: 48–63.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (1994), Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beagon, M. (2005), The Elder Pliny on the Human Animal: Natural History Book 7. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bellissime, M. (2016a), ‘Fiction et rhétorique dans les prosopopées de l’Histoire romaine: les marges de liberté de l’historien’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 363–77.Google Scholar

Bellissime, M. (2016b), ‘Polysémie, contextualisation, re-sémantisation: à propos de μοναρχία et de δημοκρατία’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 529–41.Google Scholar

Bellissime, M. and Berbessou-Broustet, B. (2016), ‘L’Histoire romaine de Zonaras’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 95–108.Google Scholar

Bellissime, M. and Hurlet, F. (eds.) (2018), Dion Cassius. Histoire Romaine. Livre 53. Texte établi par M. B., traduit et commenté par M. B. et F. H. Paris.Google Scholar

Bender, F. S. G. (ed.) (1961), Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio 54. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Beneker, J. (2011), ‘The crossing of the Rubicon and the outbreak of civil war in Cicero, Lucan, Plutarch, and Suetonius’, Phoenix 65: 74–99.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. (2001), Trajan: Optimus Princeps. 2nd edition. London.Google Scholar

Berbessou-Broustet, B. (2016), ‘Xiphilin, abréviateur de Cassius Dion’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bering-Staschewski, R. (1981), Römische Zeitgeschichte bei Cassius Dio. Bochum.Google Scholar

Berrendonner, C. (2005), ‘Les interventions du peuple dans les cités d’Étrurie et d’Ombrie à l’époque impériale,’ MEFRA 117: 517–39.Google Scholar

Berti, N. (1988), La guerra di Cesare contro Pompeo. Commento storico a Cassio Dione libro XLI. Milan.Google Scholar

Bertrand, E. (2016a), ‘L’empire de Cassius Dion: géographie et imperium Romanum dans l’Histoire romaine’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 701–24.Google Scholar

Bertrand, E. (2016b), ‘Point de vue de Cassius Dion sur l’impérialisme romain’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 675–99.Google Scholar

Bertrand, E. (2019), ‘Imperialism and the crisis of the Roman Republic: Dio’s view on late Republican conquests (Books 36-40)’, in Osgood, J. and Baron, C. (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic. Leiden and Boston: 19–35.Google Scholar

Bethe, E. (ed.) (1900), Pollucis Onomasticon e codicibus ab ipso collatis denuo edidit et adnotavit. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Bialy, K. (2017), ‘John Xiphilinos on the civil war between Pompey and Caesar in the Epitome of the Roman History of Cassius Dio,’ in Słapek, D. and Łuć, I. (eds.), Przemoc w świecie starożytnym. Źródła – struktura – interpretacje. Lublin: 437–49.Google Scholar

Bingham, S. and Imrie, A. (2015), ‘The prefect and the plot: a reassessment of the murder of Plautianus’ JAH 3: 76–91.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (1981), The Fasti of Roman Britain. Oxford.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (1987), Marcus Aurelius: A Biography. London.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (1997), Hadrian: The Restless Emperor. London.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (1999), Septimius Severus: The African Emperor. London.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (2005), The Roman Government of Britain. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bittarello, M. B. (2011), ‘Otho, Elagabalus and the judgement of Paris: the literary construction of the unmanly emperor’, DHA 37: 93–113.Google Scholar

Blanshard, A. (2010), Sex: Vice and Love from Antiquity to Modernity. London.Google Scholar

Bleicken, J. (1962), ‘Der politische Standpunkt Dios gegenüber der Monarchie’, Hermes 90: 444–53.Google Scholar

Blockley, R. (ed.) (1983), The Fragmentary Classicizing Historians of the Later Roman Empire. Eunapius, Olympiodorus, Priscus, and Malchus. Vol. II: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Leeds.Google Scholar

Boissevain, U. P. (ed.) (1895–1901), Cassii Dionis Cocceiani Historiarum Romanarum quae supersunt, 5 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Boschung, D. (2017), ‘Jenseits des Narrativs? Kaiserporträt und Staatsrelief in der Zeit des Antoninus Pius’, in Michels, C. and Mittag, P. F. (eds.), Jenseits des Narrativs: Antoninus Pius in den nicht-literarischen Quellen. Stuttgart: 53–63.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. M. (1965), ‘Review of Millar 1964’, Gnomon 37: 469–74.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. M. (1998), ‘Vita Caesarum: remembering and forgetting the past’, in Ehlers, W.-W. (eds.), La biographie antique. Geneva: 193–210.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (1970), ‘Greeks and their past in the Second Sophistic’, P&P 46: 3–41.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (1978), ‘Apollonius of Tyana: tradition and reality’, ANRW 2.16.2: 1652–99.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (2015), ‘Teachers and students in Roman Athens’, in Ash, R., Mossman, J., and Titchener, F. B. (eds.), Fame and Infamy: Essays for Christopher Pelling on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and Historiography. Oxford: 239–53.Google Scholar

Briquel, D. (2016), ‘Origines et période royale’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 125–41.Google Scholar

Brizzi, G. (2016), ‘Cassio Dione e le campagne d’Oriente’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 741–71.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1962), ‘Roman constitutional problems’, CR 12: 70–3.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1963), ‘Review of H. D. Meyer: Die Außenpolitik des Augustus und die augusteische Dichtung’, JRS 53: 170–6.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1974), ‘C. Fabricius Tuscus and an Augustan dilectus’, ZPE 13: 161–85.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1977), ‘Lex de Imperio Vespasiani’, JRS 67: 95–116.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1980), ‘On historical fragments and epitomes’, CQ 30: 477–94.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. and Moore, J. M. (1973), Res Gestae Divi Augusti: The Achievements of the Divine Augustus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Budelmann, F. (2002), ‘Classical commentary in Byzantium: John Tzetzes on ancient Greek literature’, in Gibson, R. K. and Kraus, C. S. (eds.), The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory. Leiden and Boston: 141–69.Google Scholar

Buraselis, K. (2007), Θεῖα δωρεά: das göttlich-kaiserliche Geschenk: Studien zur Politik der Severer und zur Constitutio Antoniniana, Vienna. (Translation of Theia Dorea: Meletes pano sten politike tes dynasteias ton Severon kai ten Constitutio Antoniniana, Athens, 1989.)Google Scholar

Burden-Strevens, C. (2015a), Cassius Dio’s Speeches and the Collapse of the Roman Republic. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar

Burden-Strevens, C. (2015b), ‘Ein völlig romanisierter Mann’? Identity, identification, and integration in the Roman History of Cassius Dio and in Arrian’, in Roselaar, S. T. (ed.), Processes of Cultural Change and Integration in the Roman World. Leiden and Boston: 287–306.Google Scholar

Burden-Strevens, C. (2016), ‘Fictitious speeches, envy, and the habituation of authority: writing the collapse of the Roman Republic’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 193–216.Google Scholar

Burden-Strevens, C. (2020), Cassius Dio’s Speeches and the Collapse of the Roman Republic. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Burden-Strevens, C. and Lindholmer, M. (eds.) (2019), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Burton, G. P. (1979), ‘The curator rei publicae: towards a reappraisal’, Chiron 9: 465–87.Google Scholar

Büttner-Wobst, T. (1890), ‘Die Abhängigkeit des geschichtsschreibers Zonaras von den erhaltenen Quellen’, in Fleckeisen, A. (ed.), Commentationes Fleckeisenianae. Leipzig: 121–70.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (2011), The Last Pagans of Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. B. (1984), The Emperor and the Roman Army. Oxford.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. B. (2005), ‘The Severan dynasty’, in Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P. and Cameron, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Second Edition. Volume XII: The Crisis of Empire, AD 193–337. Cambridge: 1–27.Google Scholar

Carlsen, J. (2016), ‘Alexander the Great in Cassius Dio’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 316–31.Google Scholar

Carroll, K. K. (1982), The Parthenon Inscription. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Monographs 9. Durham, NC.Google Scholar

Carsana, C. (2000), ‘Considerazioni sulla fondazione di Lione alla luce di una rilettura dell’epistolario ciceroniano’, Athenaeum 88: 203–17.Google Scholar

Carsana, C. (2016), ‘La teoria delle forme di governo: il punto di vista di Cassio Dione sui poteri di Cesare’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 545–58.Google Scholar

Cary, E. (ed.) (1914–27), Dio’s Roman History (‘on the basis of the version of Herbert Baldwin Foster, Ph.D.’), 9 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Champlin, E. (1979), ‘Notes on the heirs of Commodus’, AJPh 100: 288–306.Google Scholar

Champlin, E. (2003), Nero. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Champlin, E. (2011), ‘Tiberius and the Heavenly Twins’, JRS 101: 73–99.Google Scholar

Charles, M. B. and Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. (2010), ‘The sexual hypocrisy of Domitian: Suet., Dom. 8.3’, AC 79: 173–87.Google Scholar

Charles, M. B. and Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. (2013–2014), ‘Unmanning an emperor: Otho in the literary tradition’, CJ 109: 199–222.Google Scholar

Chausson, F. (1995), ‘L’autobiographie de Septime Sévère’, REL 73: 183–98.Google Scholar

Chausson, F. (2000), ‘De Didius Iulianus aux Nummii Albini’, MEFRA 112: 843–79.Google Scholar

Chenault, R. (2012), ‘Statues of senators in the Forum of Trajan and the Roman Forum in Late Antiquity’, JRS 102: 103–32.Google Scholar

Chew, K. (2011), ‘Eyeing epiphanies in Greek, Latin, and Sanskrit Texts’, Phoenix 65: 207–37.Google Scholar

Christol, M. (2016), ‘Marius Maximus, Cassius Dio, et Ulpien: destins croisés et débats politiques’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 431–46.Google Scholar

Clauss, M. (1999), Kaiser und Gott. Herrscherkult im römischen Reich. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar

Cleve, R. L. (1988), ‘Cassius Dio and Ulpian’, AHB 2: 118–24.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. (1996), ‘Fregellae, Arpinum, Aquinum: lana e fullonica nel Lazio meridionale’, in Cébeillac-Gervasoni, M. (ed.), Les élites municipales de l’Italie péninsulaire des Gracques à Néron. Naples and Rome: 199–205.Google Scholar

Coast, D. (2014), News and Rumour in Jacobean England: Information, Court Politics and Diplomacy, 1618–25. Manchester.Google Scholar

Coltelloni-Trannoy, M. (2016a), ‘La politeia impériale d’après Cassius Dion (livres 52–59)’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 559–66.Google Scholar

Coltelloni-Trannoy, M. (2016b), ‘Les temporalités du recit impérial dans l’Histoire romaine de Cassius Dion’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 335–62.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. (ed.) (2009), Res Gestae Divi Augusti: Text, Translation and Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J., Bispham, E. H., Rich, J. W., Smith, C. J. (eds.) (2013), The Fragments of the Roman Historians, 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cornwell, H. (2017), Pax and the Politics of Peace: Republic to Principate. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cortés Copete, J. M. (2016), ‘Casio Dion 68.4 y la Autobiografía de Adriano. Íber, ítalo e italiota: a la búsqueda de una identitad imperial’, Athenaeum 104: 545–66.Google Scholar

Cotton, H. M. and Yakobson, A. (2002), ‘Arcanum imperii: the powers of Augustus’, in Clark, G. and Rajak, T. (eds.), Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World: Essays in Honour of Miriam Griffin. Oxford: 193–209.Google Scholar

Coudry, M. (2016a), ‘Cassius Dio on Pompey’s extraordinary commands’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 33–50.Google Scholar

Coudry, M. (2016b), ‘Figures et récit dans les livres républicains (livres 36 à 44)’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 287–302.Google Scholar

Coudry, M. (2019), ‘The “great men” of the middle Republic in Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, in Burden-Strevens, C. and Lindholmer, M. (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden and Boston: 126–64.Google Scholar

Courrier, C. (2014), La plèbe de Rome et sa culture (fin du IIe siècle av. J.-C. – fin du Ier siècle ap. J.-C.). Rome.Google Scholar

Cresci Marrone, G. (1998), ‘Introduzione’, in Cresci Marrone, G., Stroppa, A., Rohr Vio, F. (eds.), Cassio Dione, Storia romana, V. Libri LII–LVI. Milan: 5–36.Google Scholar

Cresci Marrone, G., Stroppa, A. and Rohr Vio, F. (eds.) (1998), Cassio Dione, Storia romana, V. Libri LII–LVI. Milan.Google Scholar

Criscuolo, U. (ed.) (1979), De Creta Capta. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Croke, B. (2006), ‘Tradition and originality in Photius’ historical reading’, in Burke, J. et al. (eds.), Byzantine Narrative. Papers in Honour of Roger Scott. Melbourne: 59–70.Google Scholar

Crook, J. (1955), Consilium Principis. Imperial Councils and Counsellors from Augustus to Diocletian. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dalla Rosa, A. (2017), ‘Quando l’epigrafia è politica. A proposito dei riferimenti epigrafici nell’opera di Cassio Dione’, in Segenni, S. and Bellomo, M. (eds.), Epigrafia e politica. Il contributo della documentazione epigrafica allo studio delle dinamiche politiche nel mondo romano. Milan: 95–117.Google Scholar

Damon, C. (2000), ‘Review of Murison 1999’, BMCR 2000.03.07.Google Scholar

Davenport, C. (2011), ‘Iterated consulships and the government of Severus Alexander’, ZPE 177: 281–88.Google Scholar

Davenport, C. (2012a), ‘Cassius Dio and Caracalla’, CQ 62: 796–815.Google Scholar

Davenport, C. (2012b), ‘The provincial appointments of the emperor Macrinus’, Antichthon 46: 184–203.Google Scholar

Davenport, C. (2014), ‘The conduct of Vitellius in Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, Historia 63: 96–116.Google Scholar

Davenport, C. (2017), ‘The sexual habits of Caracalla: rumour, gossip, and historiography’, Histos 11: 75–100.Google Scholar

Davenport, C. (2019), A History of the Roman Equestrian Order. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Davenport, C. and Mallan, C. (2014), ‘Hadrian’s adoption speech in Cassius Dio’s Roman History and the problems of imperial succession’, AJPh 135: 637–68.Google Scholar

Davenport, C. and Manley, J. (eds.) (2014), Fronto: Selected Letters. London.Google Scholar

Davies, J. (2004), Rome’s Religious History: Livy, Tacitus, and Ammianus on their Gods. Cambridge.Google Scholar

de Blois, L. (1986), ‘The Εἰς Βασιλέα of Ps.-Aelius Aristides’, GRBS 27: 279–88.Google Scholar

de Blois, L. (1994), ‘Traditional virtues and new spiritual qualities in third century views of empire, emperorship and practical politics’, Mnemosyne 47: 166–76.Google Scholar

de Blois, L. (1997), ‘Volk und Soldaten bei Cassius Dio’, ANRW II.34.3: 2650–76.Google Scholar

de Blois, L. (1998), ‘Emperor and empire in the works of Greek-speaking authors of the third century AD’, ANRW 2.34.4: 3391–443.Google Scholar

de Blois, L. (1998–9), ‘The perception of emperor and empire in Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, AncSoc 29: 267–81.Google Scholar

de Boor, C. et al. (eds) (1903–10), Excerpta Historica iussu imperatoris Constantini Porphyrogeniti confecta, 4 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar

de Franchis, M. (2016), ‘Tite-Live modèle de Cassius Dion ou contre-modèle?’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 191–204.Google Scholar

Dench, E. (2013), ‘Cicero and Roman identity’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge: 122–38.Google Scholar

Dench, E. (2018), Empire and Political Cultures in the Roman World. Key Themes in Ancient History. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Denniston, J. D. (1954), The Greek Particles. Oxford.Google Scholar

Desmond, W. (2006), ‘Lessons of fear: A reading of Thucydides’, Classical Philology 101.4: 359–79.Google Scholar

Devillers, O. (2016a), ‘Cassius Dion et les sources pré-tacitéennes’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 233–41.Google Scholar

Devillers, O. (2016b), ‘Cassius Dion et l’évolution de l’annalistique: Remarques à propos de la représentation des Julio-Claudiens dans l’Histoire romaine’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 317–34.Google Scholar

Di Fonzo, N. and Bordia, P. (2007), Rumor Psychology. Social and Organizational Approaches. Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (1965), Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety: Some Aspects of Religious Experience from Marcus Aurelius to Constantine. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duff, T. (1999), Plutarch: Exploring Virtue and Vice. Oxford.Google Scholar

Duffy, J. and Papaioannou, S. (2003), ‘Michael Psellos and the authorship of the Historia Syntomos: final considerations,’ in Abramea, A., Laiou, A., and Chrysos, E. (eds.), Byzantium, State and Society: In Memory of Nikos Oiknomides. Athens: 219–29.Google Scholar

Duindam, J. (2016), Dynasties: A Global History of Power, 1300–1800. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, R. (2016), Power and Privilege in Roman Society. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dželebdžić, D. (2005), ‘Η δημοκρατική Ρώμη στην πολιτική σκέψη του Μιχαήλ Ψελλού’, ZRIV 42: 23–33.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (1984), ‘Senatorial self-representation: developments in the Augustan period’, in Millar, F. and Segal, E. (eds.), Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. Oxford: 129–67.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (1995), ‘“Tituli honorarii”, curriculum vitae und Selbstdarstellung in der Hohen Kaiserzeit’, in Solin, H. (ed.), Acta colloquii epigraphici Latini Helsingiae 3.−6. sept. 1991 habiti. Helsinki: 211–37.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (1999), ‘Elite und Leitbilder in der römischen Kaiserzeit’, in J. Dummer and M. Vielberg (eds.), Leitbilder der Spätantike – Eliten und Leitbilder. Stuttgart: 31–55.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (2009), ‘There are no cursus honorum inscriptions: the function of the cursus honorum in epigraphic communication’, SCI 28: 79–92.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (2019), ‘At magnus Caesar, and yet! Social resistance against Augustan legislation’, in Morrell, K., Osgood, J., and Welch, K. (eds.), The Alternative Augustan Age. Oxford: 78–95.Google Scholar

Edmondson, J. (ed.) (1992), Dio. The Julio-Claudians: Selections from Books 58–63 of the Roman History of Cassius Dio. London.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (1993), The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (1994), ‘Beware of imitations: theatre and the subversion of imperial identity’, in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds.), Reflections of Nero: Culture, History, and Representation. London: 83–97.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (trans.) (2000), Suetonius: Lives of the Caesars. Oxford.Google Scholar

Eisman, M. M. (1977), ‘Dio and Josephus: parallel analyses’, Latomus 36: 657–73.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (2001), ‘Structuring “Greece”: Pausanias’ Periegesis as a literary construct’, in Alcock, S. E., Cherry, J. F., Elsner, J. (eds.), Pausanias: Travel and Memory in Roman Greece. Oxford: 3–20.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2013), ‘The performing prince’, in Buckley, E. and Dinter, M. (eds.), A Companion to the Neronian Age. Chichester: 17–28.Google Scholar

Fargette, S. (2007), ‘Rumeurs, propagande et opinion publique au temps de la guerre civile (1407–1420)’, Le Moyen Age 113: 309–34.Google Scholar

Faur, J. C. (1978), ‘Un discours de l’empereur Caligula au Sénat (Dion, Hist. rom. LIX,16)’, Klio 40: 439–47.Google Scholar

Feldherr, A. (2009a), ‘Delusions of grandeur: Lucretian “passages” in Livy’, in Hardie, P. R. (ed.), Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture. Oxford: 310–29.Google Scholar

Feldherr, A. (2009b), ‘The poisoned chalice: rumor and historiography in Tacitus’ account of the death of Drusus’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 61: 175–89.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. (trans. J. Edmondson) (2009), ‘The powers of Augustus’, in Edmonsdson, J. (ed.), Augustus. Edinburgh: 90–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. (2010), ‘À propos des pouvoirs et des honneurs décernés à César entre 48 et 44’, in Urso, G. (ed.), Cesare: precursore o visionario? Pisa: 9–30.Google Scholar

Fishwick, D. (1990), ‘Dio and Maecenas: the emperor and the ruler cult’, Phoenix 44: 267–75.Google Scholar

Flach, D. (1973), ‘Dios Platz in der kaiserzeitlichen Geschichtsschreibung’, A&A 18: 130–43.Google Scholar

Flower, H. (2006), The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Flusin, B. (2002), ‘Les Excerpta Constantinients: logique d’une anti-histoire’, in Pittia, S. (ed.), Fragments d’historiens grecs. Autour de Denys d’Halicarnasse. Rome: 537–59.Google Scholar

Fomin, A. (2016), ‘Speeches in Cassius Dio’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 217–37.Google Scholar

Foster, H. B. (ed.) (1874–1906), Dio’s Rome: An historical narrative originally composed in Greek during the reigns of Septimus Severus, Geta and Caracalla, Macrinus, Elagabalus and Alexander Severus, 6 vols. New York.Google Scholar

Fox, A. (1997), ‘Rumour, news and popular political opinion in Elizabethan and early Stuart England’, The Historical Journal 40: 597–620.Google Scholar

France, J. (2016), ‘Financer l’empire: Agrippa, Mécène et Cassius Dion’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 773–85.Google Scholar

François, P. (2016), ‘Cassius Dion et la troisième décade de Tite-Live’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 215–31.Google Scholar

Freyburger, M.-L., and Roddaz, J.-M. (eds.) (1991), Dion Cassius, Histoire romaine, Livres 50 et 51. Texte établi, traduit et annoté. Paris.Google Scholar

Freyburger-Galland, M.-L. (1997), Aspects du vocabulaire politique et institutionnel de Dion Cassius. Paris.Google Scholar

Freyburger-Galland, M-L. (2010), ‘Dion Cassius et Suetone’, in Poignault, R. (ed.), Présence du Suétone: actes du colloque tenu à Clermont-Ferrand, 25–27 novembre 2004. Clermont-Ferrand: 147–62.Google Scholar

Fromentin, V. (2013), ‘Zonaras abréviateur de Cassius Dion. À la recherche de la préface perdue de l’Histoire romaine’, Erga-Logoi 1: 23–39.Google Scholar

Fromentin, V. (2016), ‘Denys d’Halicarnasse, source et modèle de Cassius Dion?’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 179–90.Google Scholar

Fromentin, V., Bertrand, E., Coltelloni-Trannoy, M., Molin, M., and Urso, G. (eds.) (2016a), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures, 2 vols. Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Fromentin, V., Bertrand, E., Coltelloni-Trannoy, M., Molin, M., and Urso, G. (2016b), ‘Introduction’, in V. Fromentin, et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 11–16.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1955), ‘Sulla Storia Romana di Cassio Dione’, RSI 67: 289–333.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1957), ‘Note sulla polemica anticiceroniana di Asinio Pollione’, RSI 69: 317–39Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1984), ‘The historians and Augustus’, in Millar, F. and Segal, E. (eds.), Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. Oxford: 61–88.Google Scholar

Gavard, C. (1993), ‘Rumeur et stéréotypes à la fin du Moyen Age’, Actes des congrès de la Société des historiens médiévistes de l’enseignement supérieur public 24: 157–77.Google Scholar

Geiger, J. (1985), Cornelius Nepos and Ancient Political Biography. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Gibson, B. J. (1998), ‘Rumours as causes of events in Tacitus’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 40: 111–29.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (1983), ‘The question of character development: Plutarch and Tacitus’, CQ 33: 468–87.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (2006), The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J. (1981), Tradition and Theme in the Annals of Tacitus. New York.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J. (2006), Representing Agrippina: Constructions of Female Power in the Early Roman Empire. New York.Google Scholar

Giua, M. A. (1981), ‘Clemenza del sovrano e monarchia illuminata in Cassio Dione’, Athenaeum 55: 14–22.Google Scholar

Giua, M. A. (1983), ‘Augusto nel libro 56 della storia Romana di Cassio Dione’, Athenaeum 61: 439–56.Google Scholar

Giua, M. A. (1998), ‘Sul significato dei rumores nella storiografia di Tacito’, RSI 110: 38–59.Google Scholar

Gleason, M. (2011), ‘Identity theft: doubles and masquerades in Cassius Dio’s contemporary history’, Classical Antiquity 30: 33–86.Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (ed.) (1972), The Annals of Tacitus Books 1–6, Volume I: Annals 1–1.54. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gotteland, S. (2016), ‘Ἔκφρασις and ἐνάργεια dans l’Histoire romaine: les choix de Cassius Dio’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 379–96.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (2005), ‘Virgil’s Sibyl and the “many mouths” cliché (Aen.6.625–7)’, CQ 55: 170–82.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (2010), ‘Augustus and “Syracuse”’, JRS 100: 69–87.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. M. (1992), The Triumviral Narratives of Appian and Cassius Dio. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. M. (1997), ‘Cassius Dio on the reign of Nero’, ANRW 2.34.3: 2558–90.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. M. (2016), ‘Cassius Dio and the city of Rome,’ in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 117–35.Google Scholar

Graham, A. J. (1974), ‘The limitations of prosopography in Roman imperial history (with special reference to the Severan period)’, ANRW 2.1: 136–57.Google Scholar

Gray, E. W. (1970), ‘The imperium of Marcus Agrippa’, ZPE 6: 227–38.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (1984), Nero: The End of a Dynasty. New Haven.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (2000), ‘Nerva to Hadrian’, in Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P., and Rathbone, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Second Edition. Volume XI: The High Empire, AD 70–192. Cambridge: 84–131.Google Scholar

Grigoriadis, I. (ed.) (2001), Ἰωάννης Τζέτζης: Ἐπιστολαί. Athens.Google Scholar

Gros, E. and Boissée, V. (eds.) (1845–70), Histoire romaine de Dion Cassius, 10 vols. Paris.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1974), The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1996), ‘The expansion of the empire under Augustus’, in Bowman, A. K., Champlin, E. and Lintott, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Second Edition. Volume X: The Augustan Empire, 43 BC–69 AD. Cambridge: 147–98.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1990), ‘The imperial policy of Augustus’, in Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M. (eds.), Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate. Berkeley: 395–416.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (2005), ‘Augustus and the making of the Principate’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge: 33–51.Google Scholar

Gunderson, E. (2014), ‘E.g. Augustus: exemplum in the Augustus and the Tiberius’, in Power, T. and Gibson, R. K. (eds.), Suetonius the Biographer: Studies in Roman Lives. Oxford: 130–45.Google Scholar

Gurval, R. (1997), ‘Caesar’s comet: the politics and poetics of an Augustan myth’, MAAR 42: 39–71.Google Scholar

Gwyn, W. B. (1991), ‘Cruel Nero: The concept of the tyrant and the image of Nero in western political thought’, History of Political Thought 12.3: 421–55.Google Scholar

Hagendahl, H. (1944), ‘The mutiny of Vesontio. A problem of tendency and credibility in Caesar’s Gallic war’, C&M 6: 1–40.Google Scholar

Hägg, T. (2012), The Art of Biography in Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hägg, T. and Rousseau, P. (2000), ‘Introduction: biography and panegyric’, in Hägg, T. and Rousseau, P. (eds.), Greek Biography and Panegyric in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: 1–28.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1990), ‘Traditional Greek conceptions of character’, in Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.), Characterisation and Individuality in Greek Literature. Oxford: 32–59.Google Scholar

Hammond, M. (1932), ‘The significance of the speech of Maecenas in Dio Cassius, Book LII’, TAPA 63: 88–102.Google Scholar

Hammond, M. (1957), ‘Imperial elements in the formula of the Roman emperors during the first two and a half centuries of the empire’, MAAR 25: 19–64.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2012), Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardy, E. G. (1906), Studies in Roman History. London.Google Scholar

Hardy, E. G. (1919), ‘Lectio senatus and census under Augustus’, CQ 13.1: 43–9.Google Scholar

Harker, A. (2008), Loyalty and Dissidence in Roman Egypt. The Case of the Acta Alexandrinorum. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Harrington, D. (1977), ‘Cassius Dio as a military historian’, Acta Classica 20: 159–65.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. (2016), Roman Power: A Thousand Years of Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (ed.) (1991), Vergil Aeneid 10. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harte, V. and Lane, M. (eds.) (2013), Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hawkins, T. (2017), ‘Pollio’s paradox: popular invective and the transition to empire’, in Grig, L. (ed.), Popular Culture in the Ancient World. Cambridge: 129–48.Google Scholar

Hekster, O. (2002), Commodus: An Emperor at the Crossroads. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Hekster, O. (2010), ‘Reversed epiphanies: Roman emperors deserted by gods’, Mnemosyne 63: 601–15.Google Scholar

Hekster, O., Claes, L., Manders, E., Slootjes, D., Klaassen, Y., and de Haan, N. (2014), ‘Nero’s ancestry and the construction of imperial ideology in the early empire. A methodological case study’, Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology 1: 7–27.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2001), Telling Tales on Caesar: Roman Stories from Phaedrus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Henri, R. (ed.) (1951–91), Photios, Bibliothèque. Paris.Google Scholar

Hidber, T. (2004), ‘Cassius Dio’, in de Jong, I. J. F., Nünlist, R., and Bowie, A. (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature. Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume I. Leiden and Boston: 187–99.Google Scholar

Hillard, T. W. (2011), ‘Velleius 2.124.2 and the reluctant princeps: the evolution of Roman perceptions of leadership’, in Cowan, E. (ed.), Velleius Paterculus: Making History. Swansea: 219–51.Google Scholar

Hohl, E. (1937), ‘Zu den Testamenten des Augustus’, Klio 30: 323–42.Google Scholar

Hölscher, T. (2003), ‘Images of war in Greece and Rome: between military practice, public memory, and cultural symbolism’, JRS 93: 1–17.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1979), ‘Doctus sermones utriusque linguae?’, ECM 23: 79–95.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (2003), The Culture of the Roman Plebs. London.Google Scholar

Hose, M. (1994), Erneuerung der Vergangenheit: Die Historiker im Imperium Romanum von Florus bis Cassius Dio. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hose, M. (2007), ‘Cassius Dio: a senator and historian in the age of anxiety’, in Marincola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography. Malden, MA: 461–67.Google Scholar

Hose, M. (2011), ‘Der Kaiser und seine Begrenzung durch die antike Literature: Betrachtungen zu Cassius Dio’, in Winterling, A. (ed.), Zwischen Strukturgeschichte und Biographie: Probleme und Perspektiven einer neuen Römischen Kaisergeschichte 31 v. Chr.–192 n. Chr. Munich: 113–24.Google Scholar

Hude, C. (ed.) (1927), Scholia in Thucydidem ad optimos codices collata. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hug, T. B. (2009), ‘Outwitting power: bogus kings and officials in early modern England’, in Kümin, B. (ed.), Political Space in Pre-industrial Europe. Farnham: 215–30.Google Scholar

Humble, N. (2013), ‘Imitation as commentary? Plutarch and Byzantine historiography in the tenth century’, in Pace, G. and Volpe Cacciatore, P. (ed.), Gli Scritti di Plutarco: tradizione, traduzione, ricezione, commento. Naples: 219–25.Google Scholar

Humble, N. (forthcoming) ‘Plutarch in Byzantium’, in Titchener, F. and Zadorozhny, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Plutarch. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunt, J. M. (2014), ‘Rumour, newsletters and the Pope’s death in early modern Rome’, in Davies, S. and Fletcher, P. (eds.), News in Early Modern Europe: Currents and Connections. Leiden: 141–58.Google Scholar

Hurley, D.W. (2014), ‘Suetonius’ rubric sandwich’, in Power, T. and Gibson, R. K. (eds.), Suetonius the Biographer: Studies in Roman Lives. Oxford: 21–37.Google Scholar

Huttner, U. (2004), Recusatio Imperii: Ein politisches Ritual zwischen Ethik und Taktik. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Ibbetson, D. (2005), ‘High classical law’, in Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P., and Cameron, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Second Edition. Volume XII: The Crisis of Empire, AD 193–337. Cambridge: 184–199.Google Scholar

Icks, M. (2008), ‘Heliogabalus, a monster on the Roman throne. The literary construction of a “bad” emperor’, in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M. (eds.), Kakos: Badness and Anti-value in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: 477–88.Google Scholar

Icks, M. (2012), The Crimes of Elagabalus: The Life and Legacy of Rome’s Decadent Boy Emperor. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Icks, M. (2017), ‘Turning victory into defeat: negative assessments of imperial triumphs in Greco-Roman literature’, in Goldbeck, F. and Wienand, J. (eds.), Der römische Triumph in Prinzipat und Spätantike. Berlin: 317–33.Google Scholar

Israelowich, I. (2008), ‘The rain miracle of Marcus Aurelius: (re-)construction of consensus’, G&R 55: 83–102.Google Scholar

Jaeger, M. (2008), Archimedes and the Roman Imagination. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (1992), The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume IV: Books 13–16. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jeffreys, E. (1979), ‘The attitudes of Byzantine chroniclers towards ancient history,’ Byzantion 49: 199–238.Google Scholar

Jones, A. H. M. (1951), ‘The imperium of Augustus’, JRS 41: 112–19.Google Scholar

Jones, A. H. M. (1960), Studies in Roman Government and Law. New York.Google Scholar

Jones, B. (2016), ‘Cassius Dio – Pepaideumenos and politician on kingship’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 297–315.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (1966), ‘Towards a chronology of Plutarch’s works’, JHS 56: 61–74.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (1972), ‘Aelius Aristides, ΕΙΣ ΒΑΣΙΛΕΑ’, JRS 62: 134–52.Google Scholar

Juntunen, K. (2013), ‘The lost books of Cassius Dio’, Chiron 43: 459–86.Google Scholar

Juntunen, K. (2015), ‘The image of Cleopatra in Ioannes Xiphilinos’ Epitome of Cassius Dio: A reflection of the empress Eudokia Makrembolitissa?’, Acta Byzantina Fennica 4: 123–51.Google Scholar

Kaimio, J. (1979), The Romans and the Greek Language. Helsinki.Google Scholar

Kaldellis, A. (2012), ‘The Byzantine role in the making of the corpus of classical Greek historiography: a preliminary investigation’, JHS 132: 71–85.Google Scholar

Kaldellis, A. (2015a), Byzantine Readings of Ancient Historians. New York.Google Scholar

Kaldellis, A. (2015b), The Byzantine Republic: People and Power in New Rome. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Kaldellis, A. and Krallis, D. (eds.) (2012), The History of Michael Attaleites. Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Kampianaki, T. (2017a), John Zonaras’s Epitome of History (12th c.): A Compendium of Jewish-Roman History and Its Readers. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Kampianaki, T. (2017b), ‘Plutarch’s Lives in the Byzantine chronographic tradition: the Chronicle of John Zonaras’, BMGS 41: 15–29.Google Scholar

Kannicht, R. and Snell, B. (eds.) (1981), Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. Volume II. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Kapferer, J.-N. (1990), Rumors: Uses, Interpretations, and Images. New Brunswick and London.Google Scholar

Karpozilos, A. (2009), Βυζαντινοί Ιστορικοί και Χρονογράφοι. Τόμος Γ’ (11^ος – 12^ος αι.). Athens.Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. (2007), ‘Augustus the ironic paradigm: Cassius Dio’s portrayal of the lex Julia and the lex Papia Poppaea’, Phoenix 61: 70–85.Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. M. (2010), ‘Lucian, Fronto, and the absence of contemporary historiography under the Antonines’, AJPh 131: 285–325.Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. M. (2012), ‘Commemoration of the Antonine aristocracy in Cassius Dio and the Historia Augusta’, CQ 62: 387–414.Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. M. (2014), Greek Narratives of the Roman Empire under the Severans: Cassius Dio, Philostratus and Herodian. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. M. (2016a), ‘Dio, Caesar and the Vesontio mutineers (38.34–47): a rhetoric of lies’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 238–57.Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. M. (2016b), ‘The fall of Elagabalus as literary narrative and political reality: a reconsideration’, Historia 65: 348–90.Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. M. (2018), ‘Beyond city limits: citizenship and authorship in imperial Greek literature’, in Berthelot, K. and Price, J. J. (eds.), In the Crucible of Empire: The Impact of Roman Citizenship upon Greeks, Jews and Christians. Leuven: 73–103.Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. M. (2020), ‘The romance of Republican history: narrative tension and resolution in Florus, Appian, and Chariton’, in König, A., Langlands, R., and Uden, J. (eds.), Literature and Culture in the Roman Empire, 96–235: Cross-Cultural Interactions. Cambridge: 114–33.Google Scholar

Kennell, N. M. (1988). ‘Nerwn Periodonikhs’, AJP 109: 239–51.Google Scholar

Kierdorf, W. (1980), Laudatio Funebris: Interpretationen und Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar

Kleijwegt, M. (1994), ‘Caligula’s “triumph” at Baiae’, Mnemosyne 47: 652–71.Google Scholar

Klinger, F. (1963), Tacitus über Augustus und Tiberius. Munich.Google Scholar

Koenen, L. (1970), ‘Die laudatio funebris des Augustus für Agrippa’, ZPE 5: 217–83.Google Scholar

Kolb, F. (1972), Literarische Beziehungen zwischen Cassius Dio, Herodian und der Historia Augusta. Bonn.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. and Walsh, R. (2016), ‘Civic and subversive biography in antiquity’, in de Temmerman, K. and Demoen, K. (eds.), Writing Biographies in Greece and Rome: Narrative Technique and Fictionalization. Cambridge: 26–43.Google Scholar

Kovács, P. (2009), Marcus Aurelius’ Rain Miracle and the Marcomannic Wars. Mnemosyne Supplement 308. Leiden.Google Scholar

Kragelund, P. (2012), ‘Tacitus, Dio, and the “sophist” Maternus’, Historia 61: 495–506.Google Scholar

Krallis, D. (2012), Michael Attaleiates and the Politics of Imperial Decline in Eleventh-Century Byzantium. Tempe.Google Scholar

Kröss, K. (2017), Die politische Rolle der stadtrömischen plebs in der Kaiserzeit. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Kruse, M. (2019), ‘The epitomator Ioannes Xiphilinos and the eleventh-century Xiphilinoi’, JÖB 69: 257–74.Google Scholar

Kuhlmann, P. (2010), ‘Die Maecenas-Rede bei Cassius Dio: Anachronismen und intertextuelle Bezüge’, in Pausch, D. (ed.), Stimmen der Geschichte: Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie. Berlin and New York: 109–21.Google Scholar

Kuhn-Chen, B. (2002), Geschichtskonzeptionen griechischer Historiker im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert n.Chr. Untersuchungen zu den Werken von Appian, Cassius Dio und Herodian. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Kühnen, A. (2008), Die Imitatio Alexandri in der römischen Politik: 1. Jh. v. Chr. – 3. Jh. n. Chr. Münster.Google Scholar

Lacey, W. K. (1979), ‘Summi fastigii vocabulum: the story of a title’, JRS 69: 28–34.Google Scholar

Lacey, W. K. (1996), Augustus and the Principate. Leeds.Google Scholar

Lachenaud, G. (2016), ‘Récit et discours chez Cassius Dion: frontières, interférences et polyphonie’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 397–414.Google Scholar

Lachenaud, G. and Coudry, M. (eds.) (2011), Dion Cassius. Histoire Romaine. Livres 38, 39 et 40. Texte établi par G.L., traduit et commenté par G. L. et M. C. Paris.Google Scholar

Laes, C. (2007), ‘School teachers in the Roman empire: a survey of the evidence’, AClass 50: 109–27.Google Scholar

Lang, D. M. (1983), ‘Iran, Armenia and Georgia’, in Yarshater, E. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran. Volume 3.1: The Seleucid, Parthian and Sasanian Periods. Cambridge, 505–36.Google Scholar

Lange, C. H. (2016), ‘Mock the triumph: Cassius Dio, triumph and triumph-like celebrations’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 92–114.Google Scholar

Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.) (2016), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Langford, J. (2013), Maternal Megalomania: Julia Domna and the Imperial Politics of Motherhood. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Langlands, R. (2006), Sexual Morality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Larkin, P. (1974), High Windows. London.Google Scholar

Laurence, R. (1994), ‘Rumour and communication in Roman politics’, G&R 41: 62–74.Google Scholar

Lavan, M. (2013), Slaves to Rome: Paradigms of Empire in Roman Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lavan, M. (2016), ‘The spread of Roman citizenship, 14–212 CE: Quantification in the face of high uncertainty’, P&P 230: 3–46.Google Scholar

Lavan, M. (2018), ‘The foundation of empire? The spread of Roman citizenship from the fourth century BCE to the third century CE’, in Berthelot, K. and Price, J. (eds.), In the Crucible of Empire: The Impact of Roman Citizenship upon Greeks, Jews and Christians. Leuven: 21–54.Google Scholar

Leaning, J. B. (1989), ‘Didius Julianus and his biographer’, Latomus 48: 548–65.Google Scholar

Leidholm, N. (2018), ‘Nikephoros III Botaneiates, the Phokades, and the Fabii: embellished genealogies and contested kingship in eleventh-century Byzantium’, BMGS 42: 185–201.Google Scholar

Lemerle, P. (1971), Le premier humanisme byzantin: notes et remarques sur enseignement et culture à Byzance des origines au Xe siècle. Paris.Google Scholar

Lemerle, P. (trans. Lindsay, H. and Moffatt, A.) (1986), Byzantine Humanism: The First Phase. Notes and Remarks on Education and Culture in Byzantium from Its Origins to the 10th Century. Canberra.Google Scholar

Lendon, J. E. (1997), Empire of Honour: The Art of Government in the Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar

Leone, P. A. M. (ed.) (1968), Ioannis Tzetzae Historiae. Naples.Google Scholar

Leone, P. A. M. (ed.) (1972), Ioannis Tzetzae Epistulae. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Letta, C. (1979), ‘La composizione dell’opera di Cassio Dione. Cronologia e sfondo storico-politico’, in Troiani, L., Noè, E., and Letta, C. (eds.), Ricerche di storiografia greca di età romana. Pisa: 117–89.Google Scholar

Letta, C. (1994), ‘Il “Naufragio” di Caracalla in Cassio Dione, nell’Historia Augusta e nei commentary degli Arvali’, ZPE 103: 188–90.Google Scholar

Letta, C. (2003), ‘Documenti d’archivio e iscrizioni nell’opera di Cassio Dione. Un sondaggio sulla narrazione fino ad Augusto’, in Biraschi, A. M. et al. (eds.), L’uso dei documenti d’archivio nella storiografia antica. Naples: 597–622.Google Scholar

Letta, C. (2016a), ‘Fonti scritte non letterarie nella Storia Romana di Cassio Dione’, SCO 62: 245–96.Google Scholar

Letta, C. (2016b), ‘L’uso degli acta senatus nella Storia Romana di Cassio Dione’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 243–57.Google Scholar

Letta, C. (2016c), ‘Ritorno a Cassio Dione. Caracalla e il massacro di Alessandria’, in Carsana, C. and Troiani, L L. (eds.), I percorsi di un Historikos. In memoria di Emilio Gabba. Como: 260–72.Google Scholar

Letta, C. (2019a), ‘Conoscenza e criteri di utilizzazione dei senatus consulta nella Storia Romana di Cassio Dione’, in Buongiorno, P. and Traina, G. (eds.), Rappresentazione e uso dei senatus consulta nelle fonti letterarie del principato / Darstellung und Gebrauch der senatus consulta in den literarischen Quellen der Kaiserzeit. Acta Senatus B6. Stuttgart: 189–244.Google Scholar

Letta, C., (2019b), ‘La carriera politica di Cassio Dione e la genesi della sua Storia Romana’, SCO 65: 163–80.Google Scholar

Leunclavius, I. (ed.) (1606), Ton Dionos tou Kassiou tou Kokkeianou Romaikôn Historiôn ta Heuriskomena. Dionis Cassii Cocceiani Historiae Romanae libri XLVI, partim integri, partim mutili, partim excerpti. Hannover.Google Scholar

Leunissen, P. M. (1989), Konsuln und Konsulare in der Zeit von Commodus bis Severus Alexander (180–235 n. Chr.): Prosopographische Untersuchungen zur senatorischen Elite im Römischen Kaiserreich. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. (1993), Religion in Livy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. (1997), ‘Pity, fear and the historical audience: Tacitus on the fall of Vitellius’, in Braund, S. M. and Gill, C. (eds.), The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge, 128–49.Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. (2010), Livy on the Hannibalic War. Oxford.Google Scholar

Levick, B. (1972), ‘The retirement of Tiberius to Rhodes in 6 BC’, Latomus 31: 779–813.Google Scholar

Levick, B. M. (1966), ‘Drusus Caesar and the adoptions of AD 4’, Latomus 25: 227–44.Google Scholar

Levick, B. M. (1976), Tiberius the Politician. London.Google Scholar

Levick, B. M. (1985), ‘L. Verginius Rufus and the four emperors’, RhM 128: 318–46.Google Scholar

Levin, S. (1989), ‘The old Greek oracles in decline’, ANRW 2.18.2: 1599–649.Google Scholar

Libby, B. (2010), ‘The intersection of poetic and imperial authority in Phaedrus’ Fables’, CQ 60: 545–58.Google Scholar

Lichtenberger, A. (2011), Severus Pius Augustus. Leiden.Google Scholar

Liebs, D. (2012), Summoned to the Roman Courts: Famous Trials from Antiquity. Translated by R. L. R. Garber and C. G. Cürten. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Lindholmer, M. (2018), ‘Cassius Dio and the “Age of δυναστεία”’, GRBS 58: 561–90.Google Scholar

Lindholmer, M. (2019), ‘Breaking the idealistic paradigm: competition in Dio’s earlier Republic’, in Burden-Strevens, C. and Lindholmer, M. (eds.) (2019), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden and Boston: 190–214.Google Scholar

Lippold, A. (1983), ‘Zur Laufbahn des P. Helvius Pertinax’, BHAC 1979–1981. Bonn: 173–91.Google Scholar

Littman, R. J. and Littman, M. L. (1973), ‘Galen and the Antonine plague’, AJP 94: 243–55.Google Scholar

Lott, J. B. (ed.) (2012), Death and Dynasty in Early Imperial Rome: Key Sources, with Text, Translation and Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Luce, T. J. (1977), Livy and the Composition of his History. Princeton.Google Scholar

Luce, T. J. (1989), ‘Ancient views on the causes of bias in historical writing’, CP 84: 16–31.Google Scholar

Maccari, A. (2015), ‘Quid sit pomerium: appunti su Gellio, Noctes Atticae XIII, 14. Le fonti e il confronto con Festo 294 L.’, SCO 61: 313–33.Google Scholar

Madsen, J. M. (2016), ‘Criticising the benefactors: the Severans and the return of dynastic rule’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 136–58.Google Scholar

Madsen, J. M. (2020). Cassius Dio. Ancients in Action. London.Google Scholar

Magdalino, P. (1983), ‘Aspects of twelfth-century Byzantine Kaiserkritik,’ Speculum 58: 326–46.Google Scholar

Magdalino, P. (2013a), ‘Byzantine encyclopaedism of the ninth and tenth centuries,’ in König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Encyclopaedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Cambridge: 219–31.Google Scholar

Magdalino, P. (2013b), ‘Knowledge and authority and authorised history: the imperial intellectual programme of Leo VI and Constantine VII,’ in Armstrong, P. (ed.), Authority in Byzantium. Farnham: 187–209.Google Scholar

Magdalino, P. and Macrides, R. (1992), ‘The fourth kingdom and the rhetoric of Hellenism’, in Magdalino, P. (ed.), The Perception of the Past in Twelfth-Century Europe. London: 117–56.Google Scholar

Magie, D. (1950), Roman Rule in Asia Minor. Princeton.Google Scholar

Makhlaiuk, A. (2017), ‘Review of Fromentin et al. 2016’, BMCR 2017.12.15.Google Scholar

Mallan, C. T. (2013a), ‘Cassius Dio on Julia Domna: a study of the political and ethical functions of biographical representation in Dio’s Roman History’, Mnemosyne 66: 734–60.Google Scholar

Mallan, C. T. (2013b), ‘The style, method, and programme of Xiphilinus’ Epitome of Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, GRBS 53: 610–44.Google Scholar

Mallan, C. T. (2014), ‘The rape of Lucretia in Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, CQ 64: 758–71.Google Scholar

Mallan, C. T. (2016), ‘Parrhēsia in Cassius Dio’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 258–75.Google Scholar

Mallan, C. T. (2017a), ‘The book indices in the manuscripts of Cassius Dio’, CQ 66: 705–23.Google Scholar

Mallan, C. T. (2017b), ‘The spectre of Alexander: Cassius Dio and the Alexander motif’, Greece and Rome 64: 132–44.Google Scholar

Mallan, C. T. (2018), ‘The historian John Zonaras: some observations on his sources and methods’, in Devillers, O. and Sebastiani, B. (eds.), Sources et modèles des historiens anciens. Bordeaux: 353–66.Google Scholar

Mallan, C. T. (2019), ‘The regal period in the Excerpta Constantiniana and the early Byzantine extracts from Dio’s Roman History’, in Burden-Strevens, C. and Lindholmer, M. O. (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden and Boston: 76–96.Google Scholar

Malloch, S. J. V. (ed.) (2013), The Annals of Tacitus Book 11. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Manders, E. and Slootjes, D. (2015), ‘Linking inscriptions to provincial coins: A reappraisal of Nero’s visit to Greece’, Latomus 74: 989–1005.Google Scholar

Manuwald, B. (1973), ‘Cassius Dio und das „Totengericht“ über Augustus bei Tacitus’, Hermes 101: 352–74.Google Scholar

Manuwald, B. (1979), Cassius Dio und Augustus. Philologische Untersuchungen zu den Büchern 45–56. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Marañón, G. (1956), Tiberius Caesar: A Study in Resentment. London.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (1997), Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (1999), ‘Genre, convention and innovation in Greco-Roman historiography’, in Kraus, C. S. (ed.), The Limits of Historiography. Leiden: 281–324.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2007), ‘Speeches in classical historiography’, in Maricola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography. Oxford and Malden, MA: 118–32.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2010), ‘The rhetoric of history, allusion, intertextuality, and exemplarity in historiographical speeches’, in Pausch, D. (ed.), Stimmen der Geschichte: Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie. Berlin: 259–89.Google Scholar

Markopoulos, A. (2006), ‘Roman antiquarianism: aspects of the Roman past in the middle Byzantine period,’ in Jeffreys, E. (ed.), Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Byzantine Studies. Aldershot: 277–97.Google Scholar

Markopoulos, A. (2010), ‘From narrative historiography to historical biography: New trends in Byzantine historical writing in the 10th–11th centuries’, BZ 102: 697–715.Google Scholar

Marotta, V. (2009), La cittadinanza romana in età imperiale (secoli I-III d.C.). Turin.Google Scholar

Martin, R. (2001), Tacitus: Annals V & VI. Warminster.Google Scholar

Martini, M. (2010), ‘Il ruolo paradigmatico della figura di Marco Aurelio in Cassio Dione: confronto con la figura di Caracalla’, Sileno 36: 63–77.Google Scholar

Marx, F. A. (1936), ‘Aufidius Bassus’, Klio 29: 94–101.Google Scholar

Mazzuchi, C. M. (1979), ‘Alcune vicende della tradizione di Cassio Dione in epoca bizantina’, Aevum 53: 94–139.Google Scholar

McDonald, A. H. (1966), ‘Review of Millar 1964’, CR 16: 318–20.Google Scholar

Meckler, M. L. (1999), ‘Caracalla the intellectual’, in Dal Dovolo, E. and Rinaldi, G. (eds.), Gli Imperatori Severi: storia, archeologia, religione. Rome: 39–46.Google Scholar

Mehl, A. (1981), ‘Bemerkungen zu Dios und Tacitus Arbeitsweise und zur Quellenlage im „Totengericht“ über Augustus’, Gymnasium 88: 54–64.Google Scholar

Mendels, D. (1986), ‘Greek and Roman history in the Bibliotheca of Photius: a note,’ Byzantion 56: 196–206.Google Scholar

Mennen, I. (2011), Power and Status in the Roman Empire, AD 193–284. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Meyer, P. (1891), De Maecenatis oratione a Dione ficta. Berlin.Google Scholar

Meyer, H.-D. (1961), Die Außenpolitik des Augustus und die augusteische Dichtung. Cologne.Google Scholar

Michels, C. (2018), Antoninus Pius und die Rollenbilder des römischen Princeps. Berlin.Google Scholar

Migliorati, G. (2003), Cassio Dione e l’impero romano da Nerva ad Antonino Pio: alla luce dei nuovi documenti. Milan.Google Scholar

Millar, F. G. B. (1961), ‘Some speeches in Cassius Dio’, MH 18: 11–22.Google Scholar

Millar, F. G. B. (1964), A Study of Cassius Dio. Oxford.Google Scholar

Millar, F. G. B. (1998), The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Millar, F. G. B. (2005), ‘Rome in Greek culture: Cassius Dio and Ulpian’, in Troiani, L. and Zecchini, G. (eds.), La cultura storica nei primi due secoli dell’impero romano. Rome: 17–40.Google Scholar

Millar, F. G. B. (2016), ‘Préface’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 9–10.Google Scholar

Misener, G. (1918), ‘Review of Cary 1914–27: i–vi’, CPh 13: 420.Google Scholar

Mitchell, S. (1995), Anatolia: Land, Men and Gods in Asia Minor, 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Molin, M. (2004), ‘De l’intérêt des Excerpta historica iussu Imp. Constantini Pophyrogenitii pour le lecture de la dernière décade de Dion Cassius’, Ktema 29: 209–13.Google Scholar

Molin, M. (2006), ‘Mots, images et situations de crise dans la dernière décade de Dion Cassius d’après les Epitomai de Xiphilin’, in Quet, M.-H., Giardina, A. and Christol, M. (eds.), La “crise” de l’Empire romain de Marc Aurèle à Constantin: mutations, continuités, ruptures. Paris: 435–53.Google Scholar

Molin, M. (2016a), ‘Biographie de l’historien Cassius Dion’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 431–46.Google Scholar

Molin, M. (2016b), ‘Cassius Dion et la société de son temps’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 469–82.Google Scholar

Molinier-Arbo, A. (2009), ‘Dion Cassius versus Marius Maximus? Éléments de polémique entre les Romaika et l’Histoire Auguste’, Phoenix 63: 278–95.Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. (1887), Römisches Staatsrecht, 3rd edition. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Moore, D. W. (2012), ‘A note on CIL VI.1585a-b and the role of Adrastus, procurator of the Column of Marcus Aurelius’, ZPE 181: 221–29.Google Scholar

Morris, J. (1965), ‘Review of Millar 1964’, JHS 85: 184–85.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. (2004), Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Moscovich, M. J. (2004), ‘Cassius Dio’s palace sources for the reign of Septimius Severus’, Historia 53: 356–68.Google Scholar

Mratschek, S. (2013), ‘Nero the imperial misfit: Philhellenism in a rich man’s world’, in Buckley, E. and Dinter, M. (eds.), A Companion to the Neronian Age. Chichester: 45–62.Google Scholar

Müller, C. G. (ed.) (1811), John Tzetzes, On Lycophron. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Murison, C. L. (1999), Rebellion and Reconstruction: Galba to Domitian. An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History Books 64–67 (AD 68–69). Atlanta.Google Scholar

Musurillo, H. (ed.) (1954), The Acts of the Pagan Martyrs. Acta Alexandrinorum. Oxford.Google Scholar

Németh, A. (2010), Imperial Systematization of the Past: Emperor Constantine VII and His Historical Excerpts. PhD thesis, Central European University.Google Scholar

Németh, A. (2016), ‘Excerpts versus fragments: deconstructions and reconstructions of the Excerpta Constantiniana’, in Grafton, A. and Most, G. W. (eds.), Canonical Texts and Scholarly Practices: A Global Comparative Approach. Cambridge: 253–74.Google Scholar

Neméth, A. (2018), The Excerpta Constantiniana and the Byzantine Appropriation of the Past. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Neville, L. (2018), Guide to Byzantine Historical Writing. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Newbold, R. F. (1975), ‘Cassius Dio and the games’, AC 44: 589–604.Google Scholar

Newman, W.L. (1887–1902), The Politics of Aristotle. Oxford.Google Scholar

Niebuhr, B. G. (trans. H. M. Chepmell and F. Demmler) (1875), Niebuhr’s Lectures on Roman History: Volume I. London.Google Scholar

Nixon, C. E. V. and Rodgers, B. S. (eds.) (1994), In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Noè, E. (1994), Commento storico a Cassio Dione LIII. Como.Google Scholar

Noreña, C. F. (2009), ‘The ethics of autocracy in the Roman world’, in Balot, R. K. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Malden, MA: 266–79.Google Scholar

Noreña, C. F. (2011), Imperial Ideals in the Roman West: Representation, Circulation, Power. Cambridge.Google Scholar

North, H. (1966), Sophrosyne: Self-Knowledge and Self-Restraint in Greek Literature. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Nutton, V. (2013), ‘Avoiding distress’, in Singer, P. N. (eds.), Galen. Psychological Writings. Cambridge: 43–106.Google Scholar

Oakley, S. (1997–2005), A Commentary on Livy, Books VI–X, 4 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ober, J. (1982), ‘Tiberius and the political testament of Augustus’, Historia 31: 306–28.Google Scholar

Olson, A. (2017), ‘Working with Roman history: Attalieates’ portrayal of the Normans’, BMGS 41: 1–14.Google Scholar

O’Neill, P. (2003), ‘Going round in circles: popular speech in ancient Rome’, Classical Antiquity 22: 135–76.Google Scholar

Osgood, J. (2016), ‘Cassius Dio’s secret history of Elagabalus’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 177–90.Google Scholar

Osgood, J. and Baron, C. (eds.) (2019), Cassius Dio and the Late Republic. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Paillard, B. (1990), ‘L’écho de la rumeur’, Communications 12: 125–39.Google Scholar

Pandey, N. B. (2018), The Poetics of Power in Augustan Rome. Latin Roman Poetic Responses to Early Imperial Iconography. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pasek, S. (2013), Coniuratio ad principem occidendum faciendumque. Der erfolgreiche Staatsstreich gegen Commodus und die Regentschaft des Helvius Pertinax (192/193 n. Chr.). Munich.Google Scholar

Paterson, J. (2007), ‘Friends in high places: the creation of the court of the Roman emperor’, in Spawforth, A. J. S. (ed.), The Court and Court Society in Ancient Monarchies. Cambridge: 121–56.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (1979), ‘Plutarch’s method of work in the Roman Lives’, JHS 99: 74–96. Reprinted with a postscript in B. Scardigli (ed.) (1995), Essays on Plutarch’s Lives. Oxford: 265–318, and in Pelling 2002: 1–44.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (1982), ‘Review of Zecchini 1978’, CR 32: 146–48.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (1983), ‘Review of B. Manuwald, Cassius Dio und Augustus’, Gnomon 55: 221–26.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.) (1988), Plutarch: Life of Antony. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (1996), ‘The triumviral period’, in Bowman, A. K., Champlin, E., and Lintott, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Second Edition. Volume X: The Augustan Empire, 43 BC–AD 69. Cambridge: 1–69.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (1997a), ‘Biographical history? Cassius Dio on the early principate’, in Edwards, M. J. and Swain, S. (eds.), Portraits: Biographical Representation in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Early Empire. Oxford, 117–44.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (1997b), ‘Tragical dreamer: some dreams in the Roman historians’, G&R 44: 197–205.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (2002), Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies. London.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (2006), ‘Breaking the bounds: writing about Julius Caesar’, in McGing, B. and Mossman, J. (eds.), The Limits of Ancient Biography. Swansea: 255–80.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (2010a), ‘The spur of Fame: Annals 4.37-8’, in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J., and Pelling, C. B. R. (eds.), Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman. Oxford: 364–85.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (2010b), ‘“Learning from that violent schoolmaster”: Thucydidean intertextuality and some Greek views of Roman civil war’, in Breed, B. W., Damon, C., and Rossi, A. (eds.), Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford: 105–18.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (2018), ‘Dionysius on regime change’, in Hunter, R. and de Jonge, C. C. (eds.), Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Augustan Rome. Cambridge: 203–20.Google Scholar

Penzel, A. J. (ed.) (1786–99), Des Dio Cassius Coccejanus, ehemalige Bürgermeisters in Rom, Jahrbücher römischer Geschichte, 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Pfuntner, L. (2015), ‘Reading Diodorus through Photius: the case of the Sicilian slave revolts’, GRBS 55: 256–72.Google Scholar

Piatkowski, A. (1984), ‘Cassius Dio über den Kaiserkult’, Klio 66: 599–604.Google Scholar

Pinder, M. and Buttner-Wobst, T. (eds.) (1841–97), Ioannes Zonarae Annales. Bonn.Google Scholar

Pirson, F. (1996), ‘Style and message on the Column of Marcus Aurelius’, PBSR 64: 139–79.Google Scholar

Pitcher, L. (2009a), ‘The Roman historians after Livy’, in Griffin, M. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA: 267–76.Google Scholar

Pitcher, L. (2009b), Writing Ancient History. London and New York.Google Scholar

Pitt-Rivers, J. (1977), The fate of Shechem: Or, The Politics of Sex: Essays in the Anthropology of the Mediterranean. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar

Pizzone, A. (2017), ‘The Historiai of John Tzetzes: a Byzantine book of memory,’ BMGS 41: 182–207.Google Scholar

Plass, P. (1985), ‘An aspect of epigrammatic wit in Martial and Tacitus’, Arethusa 18: 187–210.Google Scholar

Platon, M. (2016), ‘Sénat et pouvoir impérial dans les livres 57 et 58 de l’Histoire romaine de Cassius Dion’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 653–75.Google Scholar

Poma, G. (1989), ‘Dionigi d’Alicarnasso e la cittadinanza romana’, MEFRA 101: 187–205.Google Scholar

Pontani, F. (2015), ‘Scholarship in the Byzantine empire (529–1453)’, in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengagos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, vol. I. Leiden and Boston: 297–455.Google Scholar

Possienke, H. (2011), ‘Überlegungen zur Darstellung Mark Aurels im Geschichtswerk des Cassius Dio’, in Onken, B. and Rohde, D. (eds.), in In omni historia curiosus: Studie zur Geschichte von der Antike bis zur Neuzeit. Wiesbaden: 43–62.Google Scholar

Potter, D. S. (1994), Prophets and Emperors: Human and Divine Authority from Augustus to Theodosius. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Potter, D. S. (1999), Literary Texts and the Roman Historian. London.Google Scholar

Potter, D. S. (2011), ‘The Greek historians of imperial Rome’, in Woolf, D. (ed.), The Oxford History of Historical Writing, vol. 1. Oxford: 316–45.Google Scholar

Power, T. (2011), ‘Claudius’ Homeric quotation’, Latomus 70: 727–31.Google Scholar

Power, T. (2014a), ‘Suetonius’ Tacitus’, JRS 104: 205–25.Google Scholar

Power, T. (2014b), ‘Introduction: the originality of Suetonius’, in Power, T. and Gibson, R. K. (eds.), Suetonius the Biographer: Studies in Roman Lives. Oxford: 1–18.Google Scholar

Power, T. and Gibson, R. K. (2014), Suetonius the Biographer: Studies in Roman Lives. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pye, L. W. (1965), ‘Introduction: political culture and political development’, in Pye, L. W. and Verba, S. (eds.), Political Culture and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: 3–26.Google Scholar

Questa, C. (1957), ‘Tecnica biografica e tecnica annalistica nei libri LXII–LXIII di Cassio Dione’, StudUrb 31: 37–53.Google Scholar

Rantala, J. (2016), ‘Dio the dissident: the portrait of Severus in the Roman History’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 159–76.Google Scholar

Rees, W. (2011), Cassius Dio, Human Nature, and the late Roman Republic. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Reimarus, H. S. (ed.) (1750–52), Ton Dionos tou Kassiou tou Kokkeianou Romaikon historion ta sozomena. Cassii Dionis Cocceiani Historiae Romanae quae supersunt, 2 vols. Hamburg.Google Scholar

Reinhold, M. (1986), ‘In praise of Cassius Dio’, AClass. 55: 213–22.Google Scholar

Reinhold, M. (1988), From Republic to Principate: An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History Books 49–52 (36–29 B.C.). Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Reinhold, M. and Swan, P. (1990), ‘Cassius Dio’s assessment of Augustus’, in Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M. (eds.), Between Republic and Empire. Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate. Berkeley: 155–73.Google Scholar

Rich, J. W. (1989), ‘Dio on Augustus’, in Cameron, A. (ed.), History as Text: The Writing of Ancient History. Chapel Hill, NC: 87–110.Google Scholar

Rich, J. W. (1990), Cassius Dio: The Augustan Settlement (Roman History 53–55.9). Warminster.Google Scholar

Rich, J. W. (1998), ‘Augustus’ Parthian honours, the Temple of Mars Ultor and the Arch in the forum Romanum’, PBSR 66: 71–128.Google Scholar

Rich, J. W. (2011), ‘Structuring Roman history: the consular year and the Roman historical tradition’, Histos 5: 1–43. Revised version of article originally published in Histos 1 (1997). Revised and reprinted in J. D. Chaplin and C. S. Kraus (eds.) (2009), Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Livy. Oxford. 118–47.Google Scholar

Rich, J. W. (2016), ‘Annalistic organization and book division in Dio’s Books 1–35’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 271–86.Google Scholar