Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics
- 2 Sociopragmatics
- 3 Inference and Implicature
- 4 Speaker Meaning, Commitment and Accountability
- 5 Social Actions
- 6 Stance and Evaluation
- 7 Reflexivity and Meta-awareness
- 8 Participation and Footing
- 9 Conventionalization and Conventions
- 10 Synchronic and Diachronic Pragmatic Variability
- 11 Activity Types and Genres
- 12 Social Groups and Relational Networks
- Part II Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics
- Part III Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics
- Index
- References
2 - Sociopragmatics
Roots and Definition
from Part I - Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics
- 2 Sociopragmatics
- 3 Inference and Implicature
- 4 Speaker Meaning, Commitment and Accountability
- 5 Social Actions
- 6 Stance and Evaluation
- 7 Reflexivity and Meta-awareness
- 8 Participation and Footing
- 9 Conventionalization and Conventions
- 10 Synchronic and Diachronic Pragmatic Variability
- 11 Activity Types and Genres
- 12 Social Groups and Relational Networks
- Part II Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics
- Part III Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter examines both the roots of sociopragmatics and current understandings of the field. It starts by positioning sociopragmaticswithin pragmatics, pointing out some particular difficulties with its conception. After consideration of whether J. L. Austin’s work could be said to be an early precursor, the foundations of sociopragmatics in the work of Geoffrey N. Leech and Jenny Thomas are reviewed, including the distinction they propose between pragmalinguistics and sociopragmatics, a distinction, it is noted, that has gained traction in certain sub-fields of pragmatics (e.g. cross-cultural pragmatics). The penultimate section examines the role of context in definitions of sociopragmatics, arguing that meso-level contextual notions are key. Finally, a definition of sociopragmatics is proposed
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics , pp. 15 - 29Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Austin, J. L. ([1962] 1975). How to Do Things with Words. 2nd ed. Edited by Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, M., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A socio-cultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4/5), 585–614.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2010). Historical sociopragmatics. In Jucker, A. H. and Taavistainen, I., eds., Historical Pragmatics. Vol. 5 of Handbooks of Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 69–96.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., Crawshaw, R. and Harrison, J. (2008). ‘Activity types’ and ‘discourse types’: Mediating ‘advice’ in interactions between foreign language assistants and their supervisors in schools in France and England. Multilingua, 27, 297–324.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. and Haugh, M. (2014). Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2015). The Language of Service Encounters: A Pragmatic-Discursive Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. and Young, Y. K. (2003). Communicating with Strangers. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1989). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1998). Women’s role in language change: A place for quantification. In Warner, N., Ahlers, J., Bilmes, L., Oliver, M., Wertheim, S. and Chen, M., eds., Gender and Belief Systems: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 1996. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, pp. 313–30.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (2018). Sociolinguistics vs. pragmatics. In Ilie, C. and Norrick, N. R., eds., Pragmatics and Its Interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 11–32.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. and Schnurr, S. (2005). Politeness, humor and gender in the workplace: Negotiating norms and identifying contestation. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 121–49.Google Scholar
Hoye, L. F. (2006). Applying pragmatics. In Mey, J. L., ed., Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 24–7.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. ([1979] 1992). Activity types and language. In Drew, P. and Heritage, J., eds., Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–100.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1995). Three levels of meaning. In Palmer, F. R., ed., Grammar and Meaning: Essays in Honour of John Lyons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 90–115.Google Scholar
Linell, P. and Thunqvist, D. P. (2003). Moving in and out of framings: Activity contexts in talks with young unemployed people within a training project. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 409–34.Google Scholar
Marmaridou, S. (2011). Pragmalinguistics and sociopragmatics. In Bublitz, W. and Norrick, N. R., eds., Foundations of Pragmatics. Vol. 1 of Handbooks of Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 77–106.Google Scholar
Mey, J. L. (1998). Pragmatics. In Mey, J. L., ed., Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 716–37.Google Scholar
Mey, J. L. (2012). Societal pragmatics. In Chapelle, C. A., ed., The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Mooney, A. (2004). Co-operation, violation and making sense. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1601–23.Google Scholar
Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. In Neurath, O., ed., International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. 1, No. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–59.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. (2005a). Pragmatic correlates of frequency of use: The case for a notion of ‘minimal context’. In Marmaridou, S., Nikiforidou, K. and Antonopoulou, E., eds., Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the Twenty-first Century. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 209–33.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. (2005b). Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1(2), 237–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. A. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. A. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1998). The politicization of ‘culture’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 14(1), 7–15.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by