Experiencing Sense, Place and Space in the Roman Villa

doi:10.1017/9781108954983.013

12 - Experiencing Sense, Place and Space in the Roman Villa

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 July 2022

Hannah Platts

Edited by

J. A. Baird and

April Pudsey

Show author details

J. A. Baird: Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
April Pudsey: Affiliation:
Manchester Metropolitan University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Philosophical studies of the interpretation of sensory information have emphasized the central role of senses in the body’s experience of the world as well as highlighting the plurality and overlap in one’s sensory responses to it. This chapter investigates how far such concepts of experiencing space through a multisensory lens are valid for the ancient Roman villa residences of mainland Italy. Sensory responses to the Roman house have previously been restricted to examining sightlines within and outside the house, as well as movement and access within it. When we consider Pliny’s descriptions of his villas, Vitruvius’ guidance on developing a villa, or Seneca’s description of Scipio’s villa, however, it becomes clear that these residences could affect numerous sensorial responses. As such, foregrounding vision and movement above other senses experienced in the Roman domestic realm risks providing only a partial understanding of life in these residences. This chapter proposes the application of further theoretical frameworks, such as soundscapes and smellscapes, for studying the villa.

Keywords

Villa of Diomedes Pompeii sensory archaeology sensorium Pliny the Younger

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Housing in the Ancient Mediterranean World
Material and Textual Approaches
, pp. 381 - 411

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954983.013 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allison, P. M. (2001). Using the material and written sources: turn of the millennium approaches to Roman domestic space. American Journal of Archaeology 105, 181–208.Google Scholar

Augoyard, J. F. and Torgue, H. (2006). Sonic Experience: A Guide to Everyday Experience. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1982). Empire of Signs, trans. Howard, R.. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. and Elsner, J. (2007). Introduction: eight ways of looking at an ekphrasis. Classical Philology 102, i–vi.Google Scholar

Beacham, R. (1992). The Roman Theatre and Its Audience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Beacham, R. (1999). Spectacle Entertainments of Early Imperial Rome. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bell, A. (2004). Spectacular Power in the Greek and Roman City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. (1994). Painted perspectives of a villa visit. In Gazda, E., ed., Roman Art in the Private Sphere. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 49–70.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. (2002). Art and nature at Oplontis. In McGinn, T. et al., Pompeian Brothels, Pompeii’s Ancient History, Mirrors and Mysteries, Art and Nature at Oplontis, & The Herculaneum ‘Basilica’. Portsmouth, RI : Journal of Roman Archaeology, 87–122.Google Scholar

Betts, E. (2011). Towards a multisensory experience of movement in the city of Rome. In Laurence, R. and Newsome, D., eds., Rome, Ostia and Pompeii: Movement and Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 118–32.Google Scholar

Betts, E. (2017). Senses of the Empire. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bull, M. and Back, L., eds. (2004). The Auditory Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Chinn, C. M. (2007). Before your very eyes: Pliny Epistulae 5.6 and the ancient theory of ekphrasis. Classical Philology 102(3), 265–80.Google Scholar

Clarke, J. (1991). The Houses of Roman Italy, 100BC–250AD: Ritual, Space and Decoration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Classen, C. (1993). Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and across Cultures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Classen, C. (1997). Foundations for an anthropology of the senses. International Social Science Journal 153, 401–12.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. and Cooley, M. (2004). Pompeii: A Sourcebook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cormack, S. (2007). Tombs at Pompeii. In Dobbins, J. J. and Foss, P. W., eds., The World of Pompeii. London: Routledge, 585–606.Google Scholar

Cummings, V. (2002). Experiencing texture and transformation in the British Neolithic. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 21(3), 249–61.Google Scholar

Day, J., ed. (2013). Making Senses of the Past: Towards a Sensory Archaeology. Carbondale: Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Day, J. (2017). Scents of place and colours of smell: fragranced entertainment in ancient Rome. In Betts, E., ed., Senses of the Empire: Multisensory Approaches to Roman Culture. Abingdon: Routledge, 176–92.Google Scholar

Derrick, T. (2017). Sensory archaeologies: a Vindolanda smellscape. In Betts, E., ed., Senses of the Empire: Multisensory Approaches to Roman Culture. Abingdon: Routledge, 71–85.CrossRef Google Scholar

Du Prey, P. de la R. (1994). The Villas of Pliny from Antiquity to Posterity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dyer, T. (1868). Pompeii: Its History, Buildings and Antiquities. London: Bell & Daldy.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (2007). Viewing Ariadne: from ekphrasis to wall painting in the Roman world. Classical Philology 102(1), 20–44.Google Scholar

Evans, F. and Lawlor, L., eds. (2000). Chiasms: Merleau-Ponty’s notion of the flesh. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Favro, D. (1996). The Urban Image of Augustan Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Förtsch, R. (1993). Archäologischer Kommentar zu den Villenbriefen des jüngeren Plinius. Beiträge zur Erschliessung hellenistischer und kaiserzeitlicher Skulptur und Architektur 13. Mainz am Rhein: Zabern.Google Scholar

Fox, R. (2008). Tastes, smells and spaces: sensory perceptions and Mycenean palatial feasting. In Hitchcock, L., Laffineur, R. and Crowley, J., eds. DAIS. The Aegean Feast. Liège and Austin, University of Liège and University of Texas at Austin: 133–40.Google Scholar

Foxhall, L. (2000). The running sands of time: archaeology and short term time scales. World Archaeology 31, 484–98.Google Scholar

George, M. K., ed. (1999). Constructions of Space IV: Further Developments in Examining Social Space in Ancient Israel. LHBOTS 569. New York and London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

George, M. (2002). Review of Reading Space: Social Interaction and Identity in the Houses of Roman Pompeii by Grahame, M. Journal of Roman Studies 92: 238–39.Google Scholar

Grahame, M. (1993). Reading the Roman house: the social interpretation of spatial order. In Lesley, A., ed., Theoretical Roman Archaeology & Architecture: The Third Conference Proceedings. Glasgow: Cruithne Press, 48–74.Google Scholar

Grahame, M. (1997). Public and private in the Roman house: the spatial order of the Casa del Fauno. In Laurence, R. and Wallace-Hadrill, A., eds., Domestic Space in the Roman World: Pompeii and Beyond. Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 22. Portsmouth, RI: JRA, 137–64.Google Scholar

Grahame, M. (1998). Material culture and Roman identity: the spatial layout of Pompeian houses and the problem of ethnicity. In Berry, J. and Laurence, R., eds., Cultural Identity in the Roman Empire. London: Routledge, 156–78.Google Scholar

Grahame, M. (2000). Reading Space: Social Interaction and Identity in the Houses of Roman Pompeii (A Syntactical Approach to the Analysis and Interpretation of Built Space). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar

Graves, L. (2020). Women’s domestic burden just got heavier with the coronavirus. Guardian, 16 March.Google Scholar

Hales, S. (2003). The Roman House and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hamilakis, Y. (1998). Eating the dead: mortuary feasting and the political economy of memory in the Bronze Age Aegean. In Branigan, K., ed., Cemetery and Society in the Aegean Bronze Age. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 115–32.Google Scholar

Hamilakis, Y. (1999). Food technologies/technologies of the body: the social context of wine and oil production and consumption in Bronze Age Crete. World Archaeology 31, 38–54.Google Scholar

Hamilakis, Y. (2008). Time, performance and the production of a mnemonic record: from feasting to an archaeology of eating and drinking. In Hitchcock, L. A., Laffineur, R. and Crowley, J., eds., DAIS: The Aegean Feast. Liège and Austin: University of Liege, and University of Texas at Austin, 3–20.Google Scholar

Hamilakis, Y. (2013). Archaeology and the Senses: Human Experience, Memory and Affect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hamilakis, Y., Pluciennik, M. and Tarlow, S., eds. (2002). Thinking through the Body: Archaeologies of Corporeality. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar

Hamilakis, Y. and Sherratt, S. (2012). Feasting and the consuming body in Bronze Age Crete and Early Iron Age Cyprus. In Cadogan, G., Iakovou, M., Kopaka, K. and Whitley, J., eds., Parallel Lives: Ancient Island Societies in Crete and Cyprus. London: British School at Athens, 187–07.Google Scholar

Hamilton, S. and Whitehouse, R. (2006a). Three senses of dwelling: beginning to socialise the Neolithic ditched villages of the Tavoliere, Southeast Italy. In Jorge, V. et al., eds., Approaching ‘Prehistoric and Protohistoric Architectures’ of Europe from a ‘Dwelling Perspective’. Proceedings of the TAG session, Sheffield 2005. Journal of Iberian Archaeology 8. Porto: Association for the Improvement of Cooperation in Iberian Archaeology, 159–84.Google Scholar

Hamilton, S. and Whitehouse, R. (with Brown, K., Combes, P., Herring, E. and Seager Thomas, M.) (2006b). Phenomenology in practice: towards a methodology of a ‘subjective’ approach. European Journal of Archaeology 9(1), 31–71.Google Scholar

Hannah, R. (2009). Time in Antiquity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hanson, J. (2003). Decoding Homes and Houses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hopwood, M. (2013). Sustenance, taste, and the practice of community in Ancient Mesopotamia. In Day, J., ed., Making Senses of the Past: Towards a Sensory Archaeology. Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University Carbondale and Southern Illinois University Press, 222–42.Google Scholar

Houston, S. and Taube, K. (2000). An archaeology of the senses: perception and cultural expression in ancient Mesoamerica. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 10, 261–94.Google Scholar

Houston, S. and Taube, K. (2003). Sensual Relations: Engaging the Senses in Culture and Social Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Houston, S. and Taube, K. (2005). Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Insoll, T. (2007). Archaeology: The Conceptual Challenge. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Jashemski, W. (1993). The Gardens of Pompeii, Volume II: Appendices. New York: Caratzas Brothers.Google Scholar

Klynne, A. (2005). The laurel grove of the Caesars: looking in and looking out. In Klynne, A., and Santillo Frizel, B., eds., Roman Villas around the Urbs: Interaction with Landscape and Environment. Proceedings of a Conference held at the Swedish Institute in Rome, September 17–18, 2004. Rome: Swedish Institute at Rome.Google Scholar

Kockel, V. and Weber, B. F., eds. (1983). Die Villa delle colonne a mosaico in Pompeji. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung 90(1), 51–89.Google Scholar

Laurence, R. and Newsome, D., eds. (2011). Rome, Ostia, Pompeii: Movement and Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lawrence, R. (1990). Public collective and private space: a study of urban housing in Switzerland. In Kent, S., ed., Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space: An Interdisciplinary, Cross-Cultural Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 73–91.Google Scholar

Lawson, G. and Scarre, C., eds. (2006). Archaeoacoustics. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar

Leach, E. W. (2004). The Social Life of Painting in Ancient Rome and on the Bay of Naples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space, trans. Smith, D. Nicholson. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1985). The dramatic date of Varro, De Re Rustica, Book III and the elections in 54. Historia 34, 248–54.Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1989). Garden parlors: nobles and birds. In Curtis, R. I., ed., Studia Pompeiana et classica in Honor of Wilhelmina F. Jashemski, II. New Rochelle, NY: Aristide D. Caratzas, 105–27.Google Scholar

MacGregor, G. (1999). Making sense of the past in the present: a sensory analysis of carved stone balls. World Archaeology 31, 258–71.Google Scholar

Marzano, A. (2007). Roman Villas in Central Italy: A Social and Economic History. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Mattusch, C. C. with Lie, H, (2005). The Villa dei Papiri at Herculaneum: Life and Afterlife of a Sculpture Collection. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962 [1945]). Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Smith, C.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mongelluzzo, R. (2013). Maya palaces as experiences: ancient Maya royal architecture and its influence on sensory perception. In Day, J., Making Senses of the Past: Toward a Sensory Archaeology. Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University Carbondale and Southern Illinois University Press, 90–112.Google Scholar

Neudecker, R. (1988). Die Skulpturenausstattung Römischer Villen in Italien, Mainz am Rhein: Zabern.Google Scholar

Nevett, L. C. (2010). Domestic Space in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Platts, H. (2011). ‘Keeping up with the Joneses’: competitive display within the Roman villa landscape. In Fisher, N. and Van Wees, H., eds., Competition in the Ancient World. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 239–79.Google Scholar

Platts, H. (2016). Approaching a lived experience of ancient domestic space. In Griffiths, S. and von Lünen, A., eds., Spatial Cultures: Towards a New Social Morphology of Cities. Abingdon: Routledge, 43–53.Google Scholar

Platts, H. (2019). Multisensory Experience in Ancient Rome: Power and Space in Roman Houses. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Porteous, J. D. (2006). Smellscape. In Drobnik, J., ed., The Smell Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg, 89–106.Google Scholar

Potter, D. (2014). The scent of Roman dining. In Bradley, M., ed., Smell and the Ancient Senses. New York: Routledge, 120–32.Google Scholar

Purcell, N. (1987). Town in country and country in town. In Macdougall, E. B., ed., Ancient Roman Villa Gardens. Dumbarton Oaks Colloquium on the History of Landscape Architecture 10. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 185–203.Google Scholar

Ricouer, P. (1970). The model of the text: meaningful action considered as a text. Social Research 38, 529–62.Google Scholar

Robertson, E. C., Seiber, J. D., Fernandez, D. C. and Zender, M. U. (2006). Space and Spatial Analysis in Archaeology. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar

Sauer, E., ed. (2004). Archaeology and Ancient History: Breaking down the Boundaries. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmeling, G. (2011). A Commentary on the Satyrica of Petronius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Semper, G. (1984). Structural elements of Assyrian–Chaldean architecture. In Gottfried Semper: In Search of Architecture, trans. Herrmann, W.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Serres, M. with Latour, B. (1995 [1990]). Conversations on Science, Culture and Time, trans. Lapidus, R.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sherwin-White, A. N. (1966). The Letters of Pliny. A Historical and Social Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Skeates, R. (2010). An Archaeology of the Senses: Prehistoric Malta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, M. (2007). Sensing the Past: Seeing, Hearing, Smelling, Tasting, and Touching in History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Stöger, H. (2011). The spatial organization of the movement economy: the analysis of Ostia’s Scholae. In Laurence, R. and Newsome, D., eds., Rome, Ostia and Pompeii: Movement and Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 215–42.Google Scholar

Storey, G. R. (1999). Archaeological and Roman society: integrating textual and archaeological data. Journal of Archaeological Research 7(3), 203–48.Google Scholar

Synnott, A. (1991). Puzzling over the senses: from Plato to Marx. In Howes, D., ed., The Varieties of Sensory Experience: A Sourcebook in the Anthropology of the Senses. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 61–76.Google Scholar

Talbert, R. (1984). The Senate of Imperial Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Veitch, J. (2017). Soundscape of the street: architectural acoustics in Ostia. In Betts, E., ed., Senses of the Empire. Abingdon: Routledge, 54–70.Google Scholar

Vout, C. (2007). Sizing up Rome, or theorizing the overview. In Larmour, D. H. J. and Spencer, D., eds., The Cites of Rome: Time, Space, Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 295–322.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1988). The social structure of the Roman house. Papers of the British School at Rome 56, 43–97.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1994). Housing and Society in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Watson, A. and Keating, D. (1999). Architecture and sound: an acoustic analysis of megalithic monuments in Prehistoric Britain. Antiquity 73, 325–36.Google Scholar

Weddle, C. (2017). Blood, fire and feasting: the role of touch and taste in Graeco-Roman animal sacrifice. In Betts, E., ed., Senses of the Empire. Abingdon: Routledge, 104–19.Google Scholar

Williams, J. (2012). Musical space and quiet space in medieval monastic Canterbury. In Day, J., ed., Making Senses of the Past: Towards a Sensory Archaeology. Carbondale: Illinois University Press, 196–221.Google Scholar

Wolf, E. R. (1990). Facing power – old insights, new questions. American Anthropologist 82, 586–96.Google Scholar

Zarmakoupi, M. (2014). Designing for Luxury on the Bay of Naples: Villas and Landscapes (c.100 BCE–79 CE). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.