Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2014). Risk-based disease surveillance – a manual for veterinarians on the design and analysis of surveillance for demonstration of freedom from disease. FAO Animal Production and Health Manual No. 17. Rome, Italy. Available from www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/1440fee4-be47-4d38-8571-4dad3f3036d6/Google Scholar

Willeberg, P., Paisley, L. G. & Lind, P. (2011). Epidemiological models to support animal disease surveillance activities. Scientific and Technical Review of the OIE, 30(2), 603–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alba, A., Casal, J., Napp, S. & Martin, P. A. (2010). Assessment of different surveillance systems for avian influenza in commercial poultry in Catalonia (north-eastern Spain). Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 97(2), 107–118.Google Scholar

Alban, L., Boes, J., Kreiner, H., et al. (2008). Towards a risk-based surveillance for Trichinella spp. in Danish pig production. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 87, 340–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Anderson, D. P., Ramsey, D. S. L., Nugent, G., et al. (2013). A novel approach to assess the probability of disease eradication from a wild-animal reservoir host. Epidemiology and Infection, 141(7), 1509–1521.Google Scholar

Carlo-Artavia, F. F., Alban, L. & Nielsen, L. R. (2013). Evaluation of surveillance for documentation of freedom from bovine tuberculosis. Agriculture, 3, 310–326.Google Scholar

Collins, L. & Scheffrahn, R. H. (2001). Red imported fire ant. University of Florida. Available from http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/creatures/urban/ants/red_imported_fire_ant.htmGoogle Scholar

Cameron, A. R. & Baldock, F. C. (1998). A new probability formula for surveys to substantiate freedom from disease. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 34(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Cannon, R. M. (2002). Demonstrating disease freedom – combining confidence levels. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 52(3–4), 227–249.Google Scholar

Christensen, J., Stryhn, H., Vallières, A. & El Allaki, F. (2011). A scenario tree model for the Canadian notifiable avian influenza surveillance system and its application to estimation of probability of freedom and sample size determination. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 99(2–4), 161–175.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2007). Commission decision on the implementation of surveillance programmes for avian influenza in poultry and wild birds to be carried out in the member states, and amending decision 2004/450/EC (2007/268/EC). Official Journal of the European Union, L115, 3–17.Google Scholar

Frössling, J., Ågren, E. C. C., Eliasson-Selling, L. & Lewerin, S. S. (2009). Probability of freedom from disease after the first detection and eradication of PRRS in Sweden: Scenario-tree modelling of the surveillance system. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 91(2–4), 137–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frössling, J., Ǻgren, E. C. C., Wahlström, H., Lindberg, A. & Sternberg Lewerin, S. (2009). Evaluation of the surveillance system for MAP infection in Swedish cattle. In Procedings of the 10th International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis. Available from www.paratuberculosis.info/images/stories/pdfs/443.pdfGoogle Scholar

Hesterberg, U. W., Cook, A. J., Stack, J. A. & Martin, P. A. J. (2009). Evaluation of the sensitivity of the British brucellosis surveillance system using stochastic scenario tree modelling. Paper presented at the 12th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics (ISVEE XII), Durban, South Africa, 9–14 August 2009.Google Scholar

Hadorn, D. C., Haracic, S. S. & Stärk, K. D. C. (2008). Comparative assessment of passive surveillance in disease-free and endemic situation: example of Brucella melitensis surveillance in Switzerland and in Bosnia and Herzegovina. BMC Veterinary Research, 4, 52.Google Scholar

Hadorn, D. C. & Stärk, K. D. C. (2008). Evaluation and optimization of surveillance systems for rare and emerging infectious diseases. Veterinary Research, 39(6), 57.Google Scholar

Hammond, N. E. B. (2010). Evaluation of emergency plant pathogen surveillance and surveillance methods for demonstrating pest freedom in Western Australia. PhD thesis, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar

Hood, G. M., Barry, S. C. & Martin, P. A. J. (2009). Alternative methods of computing the sensitivity of complex surveillance systems. Risk Analysis, 29(12), 1686–1698.Google Scholar

MacDiarmid, S. C. (1988). Future options for brucellosis surveillance in New Zealand beef herds. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 36(1), 39–42.Google Scholar

Martin, P. A. J. (2008). Current value of historical and ongoing surveillance for disease freedom: Surveillance for bovine Johne’s disease in Western Australia. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 84(3–4), 291–309.Google Scholar

Martin, P. A. J., Cameron, A. R., Barfod, K., Sergeant, E. S. G. & Greiner, M. (2007b). Demonstrating freedom from disease using multiple complex data sources 2: case study – classical swine fever in Denmark. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 79(2–4), 98–115.Google Scholar

Martin, P. A. J., Cameron, A. R. & Greiner, M. (2007a). Demonstrating freedom from disease using multiple complex data sources 1: a new methodology based on scenario trees. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 79(2–4), 71–97.Google Scholar

More, S. J., Cameron, A. R., Greiner, M., et al. (2009). Defining output-based standards to achieve and maintain tuberculosis freedom in farmed deer, with reference to member states of the European Union. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 90(3–4), 254–267.Google Scholar

Ortiz-Pelaez, A., Pfeiffer, D. U., Soares-Magalhães, R. J. & Guitian, F. J. (2006). Use of social network analysis to characterize the pattern of animal movements in the initial phases of the 2001 foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic in the UK. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 76(1–2), 40–55.Google Scholar

Sergeant, E., Happold, J., Hutchison, J. & Langstaff, I. (2010). Evaluation of Australian surveillance for freedom from bovine tuberculosis. Project AL.121R Report prepared for the Australian Biosecurity CRC for Emerging Infectious Disease. Available from www1.abcrc.org.au/uploads/5c94f8f6-7dc1-4f74-a9e4-86479f7786f8/docs/Report_surveillance_freedom_from_bovine_tb.pdfGoogle Scholar

Vose, D. (2008). Risk analysis: a quantitative guide, 3rd ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Wahlström, H., Frössling, J., Lewerin, S. S., Ljung, A., Maria Cedersmyg M. & Cameron, A. (2010). Demonstrating freedom from Mycobacterium bovis infection in Swedish farmed deer using non-survey data sources. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 94(1–2), 108–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Watkins, R. E., Martin, P. A. J., Kelly, H., Madin, B. & Watson, C. (2009). An evaluation of the sensitivity of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance for poliovirus infection in Australia. BMC Infectious Diseases, 9, 162.Google Scholar

Welby, S., van den Berg, T., Marché, S., Houdart, P. & Hooyberghs, J. (2010). Redesigning the serological surveillance program for notifiable avian influenza in Belgian professional poultry holdings. Avian Diseases, 54(Suppl 1), 597–605.Google Scholar

Whittle, P. J. L., Stoklosa, R., Barrett, S., Jarrad, F., Majer, J., Martin, P. & Mengersen, K. (2013). A method for designing complex biosecurity surveillance systems: detecting non-indigenous species of invertebrates on Barrow Island. Diversity and Distributions, 19(5–6), 629–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wikipedia (2013). Red imported fire ant. Available from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_imported_fire_antGoogle Scholar

World Organisation for Animal Health (2012). Enzootic bovine leukosis. Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Available from www.oie.int/index.php?id=169&L=0&htmfile=chapitre_1.11.9.htmGoogle Scholar