Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:43:17.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - There Must Be More

Communication to Close the Cultural Divide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

Karen O'Brien
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Elin Selboe
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonio, R. J. and Brulle, R.. 2011. “The unbearable lightness of politics: Climate change denial and political polarization.” The Sociological Quarterly 52 (2): 195202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balbus, A. 2012. Increasing Public Understanding of Climate Risks and Choices: Learning from Social Science Research and Practice. Cambridge, MA, and Ann Arbor, MI: Union of Concerned Scientists and Erb Institute and University of Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, D. 1996. On Dialogue. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boykoff, M. T. 2011. Who Speaks for the Climate: Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boykoff, M. T. 2014. Media Coverage of Climate Change/Global Warming: USA Media Coverage. http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/media_coverage/us/index.html.Google Scholar
Boykoff, M. T. and Boykoff, J. M.. 2004. “Balance as bias: Global warming and the U.S. prestige press.” Global Environmental Change 14 (2): 125–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J., Isaacs, D. and World Café Community. 2005. The World Café: Shaping Our Futures through Conversations That Matter. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Brulle, R. J. 2010. “From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: Environmental communication for civic engagement.” Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture 3 (1): 8298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brulle, R., Carmichael, J. and Jenkins, J.. 2012. “Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010.” Climatic Change 114 (2): 169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buie, S. 2010. Inviting Dialogue: Renewing the Deep Purposes of Higher Education. Worcester, MA: Higgins School of Humanities, Clark University.Google Scholar
Butler, C. and Pidgeon, N.. 2009. “Media communications and public understanding of change – Reporting scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change.” In Climate Change and the Media, edited by Boyce, T. and Lewis, J., 4358. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Carvalho, A. 2007. “Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change.” Public Understanding of Science 16 (2): 223–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clynes, T. 2012. “The battle over climate science: Climate scientists routinely face death threats, hate mail, nuisance lawsuits and political attacks. How much worse can it get?Popular Science. http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-06/battle-over-climate-change.Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. 1964. “The nature of belief systems in mass publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by Apter, D. E., 206–61. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Cook-Greuter, S. R. 2008. “Mature ego development: A gateway to ego transcendence?Journal of Adult Development 7 (4): 227–40. http://www.cook-greuter.com/GatewaytoTransc.2000%202008%20updated.pdf.Google Scholar
Crompton, T. 2011. “Values matter.” Nature Climate Change 1 (6): 276–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, J. L. 2009. “The people paradox: Self-esteem striving, immortality ideologies, and human response to climate change.” Ecology and Society 14 (1): 34. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art34/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, T. 2013. “Bringing values and deliberation to science communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (Suppl. 3): 14081–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C. and Leiserowitz, A.. 2011. “Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement.” Nature Climate Change 1 (9): 462–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, R. E. and McCright, A. M.. 2008. “A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change.” Environment 50 (5): 2635.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R. E. and McCright, A. M.. 2011. “Climate change denial, Sources: actors and strategies.” In Routledge Handbook of Climate Change and Society, edited by Lever-Tracy, C., 240–59. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Enloe, C. 2008. “Reflections.” In Inviting Dialogue: Renewing the Deep Purpose of Higher Education, edited by Buie, S., 65. Worcester, MA: Higgins School of Humanities, Clark University.Google Scholar
Fears, D. 2011. “Virginia residents oppose preparations for climate-related sea-level rise.” Washington Post, December 17.Google Scholar
Frank, T. 2011. Grace Lee Bogs on Detroit and “The Next American Revolution: Sustainable Activism for the Twenty-First Century.” Transcript of an interview of Grace Boggs, Lee and Frank, Thomas with Goodman, Amy and Gonzalez, Juan on April 14. New York: Democracy Now!Google Scholar
Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., Kayser, D. N. and Koranyi, N.. 2010. “Existential threat and compliance with pro-environmental norms.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (1): 6779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furth, I. and Gantwerk, H.. 2013. Citizen Dialogues on Sea Level Rise: Start with Impacts/End with Action. San Diego, CA: Viewpoint Learning.Google Scholar
Gastil, J., Kahan, D. and Braman, D.. 2006. “Ending polarization: The good news about the culture wars.” Boston Review 30 (2). http://bostonreview.net/BR31.2/gastilkahanbraman.php.Google Scholar
Gifford, R. 2011. “The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation.” American Psychologist 66 (4): 290302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, H. 2009. Moved to Action: Motivation, Participation and Inequality in American Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, P. S. and Nisbet, E. C.. 2012. “Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies.” Communication Research 39 (6): 701–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlund-de Witt, A. and Hedlund-de Witt, N.. 2012. “Reflexive communicative action for climate solutions: Towards an integral ecology of worldviews.” Paper presented at the Culture, Politics, and Climate Change Conference, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
Herzig, M. and Chasin, L.. 2006. Fostering Dialogue across Divides: A Nuts and Bolts Guide from the Public Conversations Project. Watertown, MA: Public Conversations Project.Google Scholar
Hill, D. 2010. “Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding.” In Science and Engineering Indicators 2010, ed. National Science Board, 7.1–7.49. Arlington, VA: NSF.Google Scholar
Hoffman, A. J. 2011. “Sociology: The growing climate divide.” Nature Climate Change 1: 195–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, M. 2009. Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction, and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, T. J. and Brown, J.. 2009. “Conversational leadership: Thinking together for a change.” The Systems Thinker 20 (9): 27.Google Scholar
Inhofe, J. M. 2011. “Climate Change Update, Senate Floor Statement by U.S. Sen. James M. Inhofe (R-Oklahoma).” January 4. http://inhofe.senate.gov/pressreleases/climateupdate.htm.Google Scholar
Involve. 2008. Deliberative Public Engagement: Nine Principles. London: National Consumer Council.Google Scholar
Isaacs, W. 1999. Dialogue: The Art of Thinking Together. New York: Currency Books.Google Scholar
Isham, J. and Waage, S., eds. 2007. Ignition: What You Can Do to Fight Global Warming and Spark a Movement. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E. and Freeman, M.. 2008. “The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism.” Environmental Politics 17 (3): 349–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. and Sulloway, F. J.. 2003. “Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 129 (3): 339–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C. and Thorisdottir, H., eds. 2009. Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D. M. 2007. “Cultural cognition as a conception of the cultural theory of risk.” Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper 73. New Haven, CT: Yale University Law School.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M. 2008. “Cultural cognition as a conception of the cultural theory of risk.” Cultural Cognition Working Paper. New Haven, CT: Yale University Law School.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M. 2010. “Fixing the communications failure.” Nature 463 (7279): 296–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahan, D. M. and Braman, D.. 2008. “The self-defensive cognition of self-defense.” American Criminal Law Review 45 (1): 165.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Gastil, J., Slovic, P. and Mertz, C. K.. 2007a. “Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the white male effect in risk perception.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4 (3): 465505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Slovic, P., Gastil, J. and Cohen, G. L.. 2007b. “The Second National Risk and Culture Study: Making sense of – and making progress in – the American culture war of fact.” http://ssrn.com/paper=1017189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D. and Mandel, G. 2012. “The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks.” Nature Climate Change 2 (1): 732–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasser, T. 2009. “Shifting values in response to climate change.” In 2009 State of the World: Into a Warming World, edited by Engelman, R., Renner, M. and Sawin, J., 122–25. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Kaufman, L. and Zernike, K.. 2012. “Activists fight green projects, seeing U.N. plot.” New York Times, February 3.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A. 1990. “Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary America.” Political Behavior 12 (1): 5992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahsen, M. 2005. “Technocracy, democracy, and U.S. climate politics: The need for demarcations.” Science, Technology and Human Values 30 (1): 137–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahsen, M. 2008. “Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: A cultural analysis of a physicist ‘trio’ supporting the backlash against global warming.” Global Environmental Change 18 (1): 204–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahsen, M. 2013. “Anatomy of dissent: A cultural analysis of climate skepticism.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (6): 732–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehr, R. L., Guild, W., Thomas, D. L. and Swezey, B. G.. 2003. Listening to Customers: How Deliberative Polling Helped Build 1000 MW of New Renewable Energy Projects in Texas. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. and Roser-Renouf, C.. 2008. Global Warming's “Six Americas”: An Audience Segmentation. New Haven, CT, and Fairfax, VA: Yale Project of Climate Change, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies and Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University.Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. and Roser-Renouf, C.. 2009. Saving Energy at Home and on the Road: A Survey of Americans' Energy Saving Behaviors, Intentions, Motivations, and Barriers. New Haven, CT, and Fairfax, VA: Yale Project of Climate Change, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, and Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University.Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. and Roser-Renouf, C.. 2010a. Global Warming's Six Americas, January 2010. New Haven, CT, and Fairfax, VA: Yale University, Yale Project on Climate Change and George Mason University, Center for Climate Change Communication.Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G. and Howe, P.. 2013. Global Warming's Six Americas, September 2012. New Haven, CT, and Fairfax, VA: Yale University, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication and George Mason University.Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C. and Hmielowski, J. D.. 2011a. Politics and Global Warming: Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and the Tea Party. New Haven, CT, and Fairfax, VA: Yale University, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication and George Mason University.Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C. and Smith, N.. 2011b. Americans’ Actions to Conserve Energy, Reduce Waste, and Limit Global Warming: May 2011. New Haven, CT, and Fairfax, VA: Yale University, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication and George Mason University.Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C. and Smith, N.. 2011c. Global Warming's Six Americas, May 2011. New Haven, CT, and Fairfax, VA: Yale University, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication and George Mason University.Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C. and Hmielowski, J.. 2012. Global Warming's Six Americas in March 2012 and November 2011. New Haven, CT, and Fairfax, VA: Yale University, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication and George Mason University.Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Smith, N. and Marlon, J. R.. 2010b. Americans’ Knowledge of Climate Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. and Til, J. V., eds. 2011. Resolving Community Conflicts and Problems: Public Deliberation and Sustained Dialogue. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. and Whitmarsh, L.. 2007. “Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications.” Global Environmental Change 17 (3–4): 445–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, E. L. 2009. Debating Climate Change: Pathways through Argument to Agreement. London: Earthscan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, S. M., Weber, E. U., Orlove, B. S., Leiserowitz, A., Krantz, D. H., Roncoli, C. and Phillips, J.. 2007. “Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information.” Global Environmental Change 17 (1): 4758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCright, A. M. and Dunlap, R. E.. 2003. “Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement's impact on U.S. climate change policy.” Social Problems 50 (3): 348–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCright, A. M. and Dunlap, R. E.. 2010. “Anti-reflexivity: The American conservative movement's success in undermining climate science and policy.” Theory, Culture and Society 27 (2–3): 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCright, A. M. and Dunlap, R. E.. 2011. “The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010.” The Sociological Quarterly 52 (2): 155–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, S., Phipps, C., Debold, C. and Zimmerman, M. E.. 2012. Campaign Plan for Climate Change Amelioration. Boulder, CO: Institute for Cultural Evolution.Google Scholar
Meijnders, A. L., Midden, C. J. H. and Wilke, H. A. M.. 2001. “Role of negative emotions in communication about CO2 risks.” Risk Analysis 21 (5): 955–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mooney, C. 2012. The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science – and Reality. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Moser, S. C. 2007. “More bad news: The risk of neglecting emotional responses to climate change information.” In Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change, edited by Moser, S. C. and Dilling, L., 6480. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, T. A., Nisbet, M., Maibach, E. and Leiserowitz, A.. 2012. “A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change.” Climatic Change 113 (3–4): 105–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norgaard, K. M. 2006. “‘We don't really want to know’: Environmental justice and socially organized denial of global warming in Norway.” Organization and Environment 19 (3): 347–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norgaard, K. M. 2011. Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donohue, J. 2004. Beauty: The Invisible Embrace. Rediscovering the True Sources of Compassion, Serenity, and Hope. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
O'Neill, S. J. and Boykoff, M.. 2010. “Climate denier, skeptic, or contrarian?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (39): E151.Google ScholarPubMed
Oreskes, N. and Conway, E. M.. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Painter, J. 2011. Poles Apart: The International Reporting of Climate Change Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University, RSI.Google Scholar
Palmer, P. J. 2011. Healing the Heart of Democracy: The Courage to Create a Politics Worthy of the Human Spirit. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Patterson, K., Grenny, J., McMillan, R. and Switzler, A.. 2002. Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Peach, S. 2012. “Sea level rise, one more frontier for climate dialogue controversy.” Yale Climate Media Forum. http://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/2012/02/sea-level-rise-one-more-frontier-for-climate-dialogue-controversy/.Google Scholar
Pienaar, M. 2011. “An eco-existential understanding of time and psychological defenses: Threats to the environment and implications for psychotherapy.” Ecopsychology 3 (1): 2539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotkin, B. 2008. Nature and the Human Soul: Cultivating Wholeness and Community in a Fragmented World. Novato, CA: New World Library.Google Scholar
Poole, K. T. 2008. The Roots of the Polarization of Modern U. S. Politics. San Diego: University of California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, K. 2012. “Picture of a polarized Congress.” UGAresearch. ftp://voteview.com/wf1/ViewpointPolarization.pdf.Google Scholar
Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S. and Pidgeon, N. F.. 2011. “Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change.” Global Environmental Change 21 (3): 1015–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. L. 2011. The Inquisition of Climate Science. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe, B. G. 2004. Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Emerging Politics of American Climate Change Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Rabe, B. G. 2009. “Second-generation climate policies in the States: Proliferation, diffusion, and regionalization.” In Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking, and Multi-Level Governance, edited by Selin, H. and Vandeveer, S., 6785. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reser, J. P., Bradley, G. L., Glendon, A. I., Ellul, M. C. and Callaghan, R.. 2012. Public Risk Perceptions, Understandings and Responses to Climate Change and Natural Disasters in Australia and Great Britain: Final Report. Gold Coast, Australia: National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility.Google Scholar
Roseman, I. J. 1994. “The psychology of strongly held beliefs: Theories of ideological structure and individual attachment.” In Beliefs, Reasoning and Decision-Making: Psycho-Logic in Honor of Bob Abelson, edited by Schrank, R. C. and Langer, E., 175208. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sarewitz, D. 2004. “How science makes environmental controversies worse.” Environmental Science and Policy 7 (5): 385403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schirch, L. and Campt, D.. 2007. The Little Book of Dialogue for Difficult Subjects: A Practical Hands-on Guide. Intersource, PA: Good Books.Google Scholar
Stone, D., Patton, B. and Heen, S.. 1999. Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Swim, J. K., Stern, P. C., Doherty, T. J., Clayton, S., Reser, J. P., Weber, E. U., Gifford, R. and Howard, G. S.. 2011. “Psychology's contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change.” American Psychologist 66 (4): 241–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Tan, S. and Brown, J.. 2005. “The World Cafe in Singapore: Creating a learning culture through dialogue.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 41 (1): 8390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M., Ellis, R. and Wildavsky, A. B.. 1990. Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. 2010. “Consensus” Exposed: The CRU Controversy. Minority staff report. Washington, DC: U.S. Senate.Google Scholar
Washington, H. and Cook, J.. 2011. Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Weber, E. U. 2011. “Climate change hits home.” Nature Climate Change 1 (4): 2526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheatley, M. J. 2002. Turning to One Another: Simple Conversations to Restore Hope to the Future. Berkeley, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, L. 2011. “Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time.” Global Environmental Change 21 (2): 690700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Café, The. 2008. Café to Go: A Quick Reference Guide for Putting Conversations to Work. San Francisco: The World Café. http://www.theworldcafe.com/pdfs/cafetogo.pdf.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×