Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T10:30:26.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Research on bullying in North America

from Part I - Social awareness and research on bullying and cyberbullying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2016

By
Sheri Bauman ,
Julian Mendez ,
Wendy Craig  and
Faye Mishna
Edited by
Peter K. Smith ,
Keumjoo Kwak  and
Yuichi Toda
Peter K. Smith
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths, University of London
Keumjoo Kwak
Affiliation:
Seoul National University
Yuichi Toda
Affiliation:
Osaka Kyoiku University, Japan
Get access

Summary

This chapter discusses the contributions to research on bullying and cyberbullying by North American researchers. It describes several seminal studies that marked the entry of North American researchers into this field of research. It continues by reviewing the contributions of researchers from this continent to the field: several methodological contributions (peer nomination and direct observation) were initiated by US and Canadian scholars. It then discusses contributions to knowledge of specific subgroups, such as students with disabilities, LGBT youth and students of diverse racial and ethnic groups. It notes that the concept of bully/victims was described early on by North American researchers. A topic that has garnered particular attention here is that of teacher responses to bullying, which we review. Next it discusses the theoretical contributions from North America: relational bullying, social cognitive theory and related theories such as social information processing and moral disengagement. This includes a discussion of the social ecological model of Bronfenbrenner, applied to bullying research by Espelage and Swearer (2004). It then outlines the contributions to research on cyberbullying. It concludes with a summary of major work from the US and Canada and some recommendations about future directions for research on this important topic.
Type
Chapter
Information
School Bullying in Different Cultures
Eastern and Western Perspectives
 , pp. 30 - 54
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abundez, G.M. (2008). School violence in Mexico and other countries. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 13, 1195–1228.Google Scholar
Atlas, R. S. and Pepler, D. J. (1998). Observations of bullying in the classroom. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A cognitive social theory. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandura, A. (2002a). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology, 51, 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (2002b). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In Bryant, J., and Zillman, D. (eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research, second edition (pp. 121–153). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bauman, S., Walker, J., and Cross, D. (eds.) (2013). Principles of cyberbullying research: Definition, methods, and measures. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bauman, S. and Del Rio, A. (2006). Preservice teachers’ responses to bullying scenarios: Comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, S. and Newman, M. L. (2013). Testing assumptions about cyberbullying: Perceived distress associated with acts of conventional and cyberbullying. Psychology of Violence, 3, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, S. and Pero, H. (2011). Bullying and cyberbullying among deaf students and their hearing peers: An exploratory study. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16, 236–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berlan, E. D., Corliss, H. L., Field, A. E., Goodman, E., and Bryn Austin, S. (2010). Sexual orientation and bullying among adolescents in the Growing Up Today Study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46, 366–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beran, T.T. and Li, Q. (2007). The relationship between cyberbullying and school bullying. Journal of Student Wellbeing, 1, 15–33.Google Scholar
Blais, J. (2008). Chatting, befriending, and bullying: Adolescents’ Internet experiences and associated psychosocial outcomes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kingston, Ontario: Queen’s University.Google Scholar
Bonanno, R. A. and Hymel, S. (2013). Cyber bullying and internalizing difficulties: Above and beyond the impact of traditional forms of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Contexts of child rearing: Problems and prospects. American Psychologist, 34, 844–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, W., Brown, K., and Jackson, M. (2012). “Under the radar”: Educators and cyberbullying in schools. School Psychology International, 33, 520–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charach, A., Pepler, D., and Ziegler, S. (1995). Bullying at school: A Canadian perspective. Education Canada, 35, 12–19.Google Scholar
Craig, et al., (2009). A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. International Journal of Public Health, 54, 216–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, W. M., Henderson, K., and Murphy, J. G. (2000). Prospective teachers’ attitudes toward bullying and victimization. School Psychology International, 21, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, W. and Pepler, D. (1997). Naturalistic observations of bullying and victimization on the playground (unpublished report). York University, Toronto, Ontario: LaMarsh Research Centre on Violence and Conflict Resolution.Google Scholar
Craig, W. M. and Pepler, D. J. (2003). Identifying and targeting risk for involvement in bullying and victimization. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 577–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., and Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21, 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, W. M., Pepler, D. J., Connolly, J., and Henderson, K. (2001). Developmental context of peer harassment in early adolescence. In Juvonen, J. and Graham, S. (eds.). Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 242–261). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Crick, N. R. and Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, N. R. and Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social‐psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cullen, D. (2009). Columbine. New York: Hachette Digital, Inc.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A. (1986). A social information processing model of social competence in children. In Perlmutter, M. (Ed.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology, 18 (pp. 77–125). New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Dooley, J. J., Pyzalski, J., and Cross, D. (2009). Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: A theoretical and conceptual review. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espelage, D. L., Aragon, S. R., Birkett, M., and Koenig, B. W. (2008). Homophobic teasing, psychological outcomes, and sexual orientation among high school students: What influence do parents and schools have? School Psychology Review, 37, 202–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espelage, D. L. and Asidao, C. S. (2001). Conversations with middle school students about bullying and victimization: Should we be concerned? Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espelage, D. L., Hong, J. S., Rao, M. A., and Thornberg, R. (2015). Understanding ecological factors associated with bullying across the elementary to middle school transition in the United States. Violence and Victims, 30, 470–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espelage, D. L. and Swearer, S. (eds.) (2004). Bullying in American schools. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, S. and Juvonen, J. (2002). Ethnicity, peer harassment, and adjustment in middle school: An exploratory study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 22, 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynie, D. L., Nansel, T., Eitel, P., Crump, A. D., Saylor, K., Yu, K., and Simons-Morton, B. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-risk youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinduja, S. and Patchin, J. W. (2012). Cyberbullying: Neither an epidemic nor a rarity. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 539–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, E. V. E., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., and Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 94–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodges, E. V. E., Malone, M., and Perry, D. (1997). Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1032–1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodges, E. V. E. and Perry, D. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 677–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holfeld, B. and Grabe, M. (2012). Middle school students’ perceptions of and responses to cyberbullying. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46, 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, J. S. and Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, J. H. and Hazler, R. J. (1991). Bullies and victims. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 25, 212–219.Google Scholar
Hoover, J. H., Oliver, R., and Hazler, R. J. (1992). Bullying: Perceptions of adolescent victims in the Midwestern USA. School Psychology International, 13, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymel, S., Rocke-Henderson, N., and Bonanno, R. A. (2005). Moral disengagement: A framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 1–11.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, K. E. and Bauman, S. (2007). Bullying in schools: School counselors’ responses to three types of bullying incidents. Professional School Counseling, 11, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. M. (2010). Internet use and child development: Validation of the ecological techno-subsystem. Educational Technology and Society, 13, 176–185.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. M. and Puplampu, P. (2008). A conceptual framework for understanding the effect of the Internet on child development: The ecological techno-subsystem. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juvonen, J. and Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78, 496–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowalski, R. M. and Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S22–S30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowalski, R. M. and Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, S13–S20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larochette, A. C., Murphy, A. N., and Craig, W. M. (2010). Racial bullying and victimization in Canadian school-aged children: Individual and school level effects. School Psychology International, 31, 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, D. M., Shapka, J. D., Domene, J. F., and Gagné, M. H. (2012). Are cyberbullies really bullies? An investigation of reactive and proactive online aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 664–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, D. M., Shapka, J. D., Hymel, S. S., Olson, B. F., and Waterhouse, T. (2012). The changing face of bullying: An empirical comparison between traditional and internet bullying and victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, M. R., Kowalski, R. M., Smith, L., and Phillips, S. (2003). Teasing, rejection, and violence: Case studies of the school shootings. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 202–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27, 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Q. (2007). Bullying in the new playground: Research into cyberbullying and cyber victimisation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 435–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishna, F. (2003). Learning disabilities and bullying: Double jeopardy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 336–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mishna, F., Khoury-Kassabri, M., Gadalla, T., and Daciuk, J. (2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully-victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., and Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Patchin, J. W. and Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 148–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D. (1998). Bullies and victims in school: A review and call for research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D. and Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepler, D. J. and Craig, W. M. (1995). A peek behind the fence: Naturalistic observations of aggressive children with remote audiovisual recording. Developmental Psychology, 31, 548–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepler, D. J., Craig, W. M., Connolly, J. A., Yuile, A., McMaster, L., and Jiang, D. (2006). A developmental perspective on bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 376–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepler, D., Jiang, D., Craig, W., and Connolly, J. (2008). Developmental trajectories of bullying and associated factors. Child Development, 79, 325–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, D. C., Williard, J. C., and Perry, L. C. (1990). Peers’ perceptions of the consequences that victimized children provide aggressors. Child Development, 61, 1310–1325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., and Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poteat, V. P. and Espelage, D. L. (2005). Exploring the relation between bullying and homophobic verbal content: The Homophobic Content Agent Target (HCAT) Scale. Violence and Victims, 20, 513–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, C. A., Espelage, D. L., and Monda-Amaya, L. E. (2009). Bullying and victimisation rates among students in general and special education: A comparative analysis. Educational Psychology, 29, 761–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, T., Kariuki, M., and Yilmaz, H. (2011). A comparative analysis of cyberbullying perceptions of pre-service educators: Canada and Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10, 1–10.Google Scholar
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtenbroit, M. L. B. (2011). Cyberbullying, school violence, and youth suicide. Dissertations. Paper 879. Retrieved Nov 6, 2015 from http://aquila.usm.edu/theses_dissertations/879Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, T., Clinton, J., McDougall, P., Schmidt, L. A., and Hymel, S. (2010). The neurobiology of peer victimization and rejection. In Jimerson, S., Swearer, S. M. and Espelage, D. L. (eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 293–327). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, T., Duku, E., Decatanzara, D., MacMillan, H., Muir, C., and Schmidt, L. A. (2008). Variation in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity among bullied and non-bullied children. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 294–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J., Nansel, T. R., and Iannotti, R. J. (2011). Cyber bullying and traditional bullying: Differential association with depression. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 368–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ybarra, M. L. (2004). Linkages between depressive symptomatology and Internet harassment among young regular Internet users. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7, 247–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ybarra, M. L., Boyd, D., Korchmaros, J. D., and Oppenheim, J. (2012). Definition and measuring cyberbullying within the larger context of bullying victimization. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 53–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ybarra, M. L., Diener-West, M., and Leaf, P. J. (2007). Examining the overlap in Internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S42–S50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ybarra, M. L. and Mitchell, K. J. (2007). Prevalence and frequency of Internet harassment instigation: Implications for adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 189–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoon, J. S. and Kerber, K. (2003). Bullying: Elementary teachers’ attitudes and intervention strategies. Research in Education, 69, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In Arnold, W. J. and Levine, D. (eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 17, (pp. 237–307). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×