Abdy, R. (2012), ‘Tetrarchy and the house of Constantine’, in Metcalf, W. E. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Coinage, Oxford: 584–600.Google Scholar

Absil, M. (1997), Les préfets du prétoire d’Auguste à Commode, Paris.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1999), ‘The poets of Bu Njem: language, culture and the centurionate’, JRS 89: 109–34.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N.(2003), Bilingualism and the Latin Language, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alföldi, A. (1929), ‘The numbering of the victories of the emperor Gallienus and of the loyalty of his legions’, NC 5th series 9: 218–79.Google Scholar

Alföldi, A.(1939), ‘The crisis of the empire (AD 249–270)’, in CAH XII¹: 165–231.Google Scholar

Alföldi, A.(1947), ‘On the foundation of Constantinople: a few notes’, JRS 37: 10–16.Google Scholar

Alföldi, A.(1952), Der frührömische Reiteradel und seine Ehrenabzeichen, Baden-Baden.Google Scholar

Alföldi, A.(1968), ‘(Centuria) procum patricium’, Historia 17: 444–60.Google Scholar

Alföldi, A.(1976), Oktavians Aufsteig zur Macht, Bonn.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G. (1969a), ‘Die Generalität des römischen Heeres’, Bonner Jahrbücher 169: 233–46.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G.(1969b), Fasti Hispanienses: Senatorische Reichsbeamte und Offiziere in den spanischen Provinzen des römischen Reiches von Augustus bis Diokletian, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G.(1977), Konsulat und Senatorenstand unter den Antoninen: Prosopographische Untersuchungen zur senatorischen Führungsschicht, Bonn.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G.(1981), ‘Die Stellung der Ritter in der Führungsschicht des Imperium Romanum’, Chiron 11: 169–215.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G.(1982), ‘Individualität und Kollektivnorm in der Epigraphik des römischen Senatorenstandes’, in Panciera, S. (ed.), Epigrafia e ordine senatorio I, Rome: 37–53.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G.(1984), The Social History of Rome, trans. D. Braund and F. Pollock, London.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G.(1995), ‘Der Status der Provinz Baetica um die mitte des 3. Jahrhunderts’, in Frei-Stolba, R. and Speidel, M. A. (eds.), Römische Inschriften – Neufunde, Neulesungen und Neuinterpretationen: Festschrift für Hans Lieb, Basel: 29–42.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G.(2001), ‘Pietas immobilis erga principem and ihr Lohn: Öffentliche Ehrenmonumente von Senatoren in Rom während der Frühen und Hohen Kaiserzeit’, in Alföldy, G. and Panciera, S. (eds.), Inschriftliche Denkmäler als Medien der Selbstdarstellung in der römischen Welt, Stuttgart: 11–46.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G.(2007), ‘Fasti und Verwaltung der hispanischen Provinzen: Zum heutigen Stand der Forschung’, in Haensch, R. and Heinrichs, J. (eds.), Herrschen und Verwalten: Der Alltag der römischen Administration in der Hohen Kaiserzeit, Cologne: 325–56.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G.(2011), ‘Eine umstrittene Altarinschrift aus Vindobona’, Tyche 26: 1–22.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G. (ed.) (2000), Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum: Volumen Sextum – Inscriptiones Urbis Romae Latinae, Pars Octava, Fasciculus Tertius, Berlin.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G. and Halfmann, H. (1973), ‘M. Cornelius Nigrinus Curiatius Maternus, General Domitians und Rivale Trajans’, Chiron 3: 331–73.Google Scholar

Allen, W. et al. (1970), ‘Martial: knight, publisher, and poet’, CJ 65: 345–57.Google Scholar

Álvarez Melero, A. (2014), ‘Du foyer au forum: la place des matrones équestres dans les activités économiques’, in de Kleijn, G. and Benoist, S. (eds.), Integration in Rome and in the Roman World, Leiden: 161–86.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. D., Parsons, P. J. and Nisbet, R. G. M. (1979), ‘Elegiacs by Gallus from Qaṣr Ibrîm’, JRS 69: 125–55.Google Scholar

Ando, C. (2000), Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Andreau, J. (1999a), Banking and Business in the Roman World, trans. J. Lloyd, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Andreau, J.(1999b), ‘Intérêts non agricoles des chevaliers romains (IIe siècle av. J.-C.–IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.)’, in Demougin, S., Devijver, H. and Raepsaet-Charlier, M.-T. (eds.), L’ordre équestre: histoire d’une aristocratie (IIe siècle av. J.-C.–IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.), Rome: 271–90.Google Scholar

Arce, J. (2000), ‘Imperial funerals in the later Roman empire: change and continuity’, in Theuws, F. and Nelson, J. L. (eds.), Rituals of Power from Late Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages, Leiden: 115–29.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. (1986), ‘Horatius eques et scriba: Satires 1.6 and 2.7’, TAPA 116: 255–88.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D.(2012), ‘Juvenalis eques: a dissident voice from the lower tier of the Roman elite’, in Braund, S. and Osgood, J. (eds.), A Companion to Persius and Juvenal, Oxford and Malden, MA: 59–78.Google Scholar

Armstrong, J. (2016), War and Society in Early Rome: From Warlords to Generals, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Arnason, J. P. and Raaflaub, K. A. (eds.) (2010), The Roman Empire in Context: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Oxford and Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Arnheim, M. T. W. (1972), The Senatorial Aristocracy in the Later Roman Empire, Oxford.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (ed.) (2007), Tacitus: Histories Book II, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Asirvatham, S. R. (2010), ‘His son’s father? Philip II in the Second Sophistic’, in Carney, E. and Ogden, D. (eds.), Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son, Lives and Afterlives, Oxford: 193–204.Google Scholar

Astin, A. E. (1967), Scipio Aemilianus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Astin, A. E.(1978), Cato the Censor, Oxford.Google Scholar

Astin, A. E.(1988), ‘Regimen Morum’, JRS 78: 14–34.Google Scholar

Atkinson, K. M. T. (1962), ‘The constitutio of Vedius Pollio at Ephesus and its analogies’, RIDA 9: 261–89.Google Scholar

Austin, N. J. E. and Rankov, N. B. (1995), Exploratio: Military and Political Intelligence in the Roman World from the Second Punic War to the Battle of Adrianople, London.Google Scholar

Bablitz, L. (2007), Actors and Audience in the Roman Courtroom, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachrach, B. S. (1999), ‘Early medieval Europe’, in Raaflaub, K. and Rosenstein, N. (eds.), War and Society in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds: Asia, the Mediterranean, Europe, and Mesoamerica, Cambridge, MA: 271–307.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1962), ‘From the Gracchi to Sulla (1940–59)’, Historia 11: 197–245.Google Scholar

Badian, E.(1972), Publicans and Sinners: Private Enterprise in the Service of the Roman Republic, Oxford.Google Scholar

Badian, E.(1989), ‘The scribae of the Roman Republic’, Klio 71: 582–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Badian, E.(2009), ‘From the Iulii to Caesar’, in Griffin, M. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar, Oxford and Malden, MA: 11–22.Google Scholar

Badian, E. and Birley, A. R. (eds.) (1979–91), Ronald Syme: Roman Papers, 7 vols, Oxford.Google Scholar

Bagnall, R. (1991), ‘Notes on Roman and Byzantine documents’, CdÉ 66: 282–96.Google Scholar

Bagnall, R. et al. (1987), Consuls of the Later Roman Empire, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Balot, R. K. (2006), Greek Political Thought, Oxford and Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balsdon, J. V. P. D. (1960), ‘Auctoritas, dignitas, otium’, CQ 10: 43–50.Google Scholar

Balsdon, J. V. P. D.(1962), ‘Roman history, 65–50 BC: five problems’, JRS 52: 134–41.Google Scholar

Baltrusch, E. (1989), Regimen Morum: Die Reglementierung des Privatlebens der Senatoren und Ritter in der römischen Republik und frühen Kaiserzeit, Munich.Google Scholar

Balty, J. C. (1988), ‘Apamea in Syria in the second and third centuries AD’, JRS 78: 97–104.Google Scholar

Bang, P. F. (2011), ‘Court and state in the Roman empire: domestication and tradition in comparative perspective’, in Duindam, J., Artan, T. and Kunt, M. (eds.), Royal Courts in Dynastic States and Empires, Leiden: 103–28.Google Scholar

Bang, P. F.(2013), ‘The Roman empire II: the monarchy’, in Bang, P. F. and Scheidel, W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the State in the Ancient Near East and Mediterranean, Oxford and New York: 412–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bang, P.F. and Turner, K. (2015), ‘Kingship and elite formation’, in Scheidel, W. (ed.), State Power in Ancient China and Rome, Oxford: 11–38.Google Scholar

Bang, P. F. and Scheidel, W. (eds.) (2013), The Oxford Handbook of the State in the Ancient Near East and Mediterranean, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Barber, R. (1995), The Knight and Chivalry, revised edition, Woodbridge.Google Scholar

Barker, G. and Rasmussen, T. (1998), The Etruscans, Oxford and Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (1973), ‘More missing names (AD 260–395)’, Phoenix 27: 135–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, T. D.(1981), Constantine and Eusebius, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D.(1982), The New Empire of Diocletian and Constantine, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, T. D.(1992), ‘Praetorian prefects, 337–361’, ZPE 94: 249–60.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D.(1993), Athanasius and Constantius, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D.(1996), ‘Emperors, panegyrics, prefects, provinces and palaces (284–317)’, JRA 9: 532–52.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D.(2009), ‘The Persian sack of Antioch in 253’, ZPE 169: 294–6.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D.(2010), Early Christian Hagiography and Roman History, Tübingen.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D.(2011), Constantine: Dynasty, Religion and Power in the Later Roman Empire, Oxford and Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Barnish, S. J. B. (1988), ‘Transformation and survival in the western senatorial aristocracy, c.AD 400–700’, PBSR 56: 120–55.Google Scholar

Barrett, A. A. (1990), Caligula: The Corruption of Power, London.Google Scholar

Barrett, A. A.(2009), ‘Herod, Augustus, and the special relationship: the significance of the procuratorship’, in Jacobson, D. M. and Kokkinos, N. (eds.), Herod and Augustus: Papers held at the IJS Conference, 21st–23rd June 2005, Leiden: 281–302.Google Scholar

Bassignano, S. (1974), Il flaminato nelle province romane dell’Africa, Rome.Google Scholar

Bastianini, G. (1975), ‘Lista dei Prefetti d’Egitto dal 30^a al 299^p’, ZPE 17: 263–328.Google Scholar

Bastianini, G.(1980), ‘Lista dei Prefetti d’Egitto dal 30^a al 299^p: aggiunte e correzioni’, ZPE 38: 75–89.Google Scholar

Bauman, R. A. (1968), ‘Some remarks on the structure and survival of the quaestio de adulteriis’, Antichthon 2: 68–93.Google Scholar

Bauman, R. A.(1996), Crime and Punishment in Ancient Rome, London.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (1987), ‘A complex of times: no more sheep on Romulus’ birthday’, PCPhS 33: 1–15.Google Scholar

Beard, M. and North, J. (eds.) (1990), Pagan Priests: Religion and Power in the Ancient World, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Beard, M., North, J. and Price, S. (1998), Religions of Rome, 2 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Beaujeu, J. (1955), La religion romaine à l’apogée de l’empire, vol. I: La politique religieuse des Antonins (96–192), Paris.Google Scholar

Bellandi, F. (2009), ‘Naevolus cliens’, in Plaza, M. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Persius and Juvenal, Oxford: 469–505.Google Scholar

Benario, H. W. (1970), ‘The family of Statilius Taurus’, Classical World 64: 74–6.Google Scholar

Benario, H. W.(1980), A Commentary on the Vita Hadriani in the Historia Augusta, Atlanta.Google Scholar

Bendix, R. (1978), Kings or People: Power and the Mandate to Rule, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Benelli, E. (2001), ‘The Romanization of Italy through the epigraphic record’, in Keay, S. and Terrenato, N. (eds.), Italy and the West: Comparative Issues in Romanization, Oxford: 7–16.Google Scholar

Beness, J. L. (2005), ‘Scipio Aemilianus and the crisis of 129 BC’, Historia 54: 37–48.Google Scholar

Bengtson, H. (1988), ‘Die Freunde des Augustus’, in Seibert, F. (ed.), Gesellschaftsgeschichte: Festschrift für Karl Bosl zum 80 Geburtstag, Munich: 9–21.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. (2001), Trajan: Optimus Princeps, 2nd edition, London.Google Scholar

Benoist, S. (2006), ‘Le marbre de Thorigny, une oeuvre au clair’, in Demougin, S., Loriot, X., Cosme, P. and Lefebvre, S. (eds.), H.-G. Pflaum, un historien du XXe siècle, Geneva: 285–303.Google Scholar

Benoît, P. and Schwartz, J. (1948), ‘Caracalla et les troubles d’Alexandrie en 215 apres J.-C.’, Études de Papyrologie 7: 17–33.Google Scholar

Beringer, W. (1954), ‘Princeps iuventutis’, RE 22, 2: 2296–2311.Google Scholar

Bernard, S. G., Damon, C. and Grey, C. (2014), ‘Rhetorics of land and power in the Polla inscription (CIL I² 638)’, Mnemosyne 67: 953–85.Google Scholar

Bernstein, N. W. (2008), ‘Each man’s father served as his teacher: constructing relatedness in Pliny’s Letters’, Classical Antiquity 27: 203–30.Google Scholar

Berry, D. H. (1996), Cicero: Pro P. Sulla Oratio, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Berry, D. H.(2003), ‘Equester ordo tuus est: did Cicero win his cases because of his support for the equites?’, CQ 53: 222–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bianchi, L. (1987), ‘Il sarcofago dei Vareni’, in Studi per Laura Breglia, Parte III: Archeologia e Storia, Rome: 159–63.Google Scholar

Bingham, S. (2013), The Praetorian Guard: A History of Rome’s Elite Special Forces, Waco.Google Scholar

Bird, H. W. (1984), Sextus Aurelius Victor: A Historiographical Study, Liverpool.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (1981), The Fasti of Roman Britain, Oxford.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R.(1991), ‘A persecuting praeses of Numidia under Valerian’, JThS 42: 598–610.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R.(1992), Locus virtutibus patefactus? Zum Beförderungssystem in der Hohen Kaiserzeit, Opladen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birley, A. R.(1993), Marcus Aurelius: A Biography, London.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R.(1997), Hadrian: The Restless Emperor, London.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R.(1999), Septimius Severus: The African Emperor, London.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R.(2000a), ‘Q. Lucretius Vespillo (cos. ord. 19)’, Chiron 30: 711–48.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R.(2000b), ‘Senators as generals’, in Alföldy, G., Dobson, B. and Eck, W. (eds.), Kaiser, Heer, und Gesellschaft in der römischen Kaiserzeit: Gedenkschrift für Eric Birley, Stuttgart: 97–120.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R.(2003), ‘The commissioning of equestrian officers’, in Wilkes, J. J. (ed.), Documenting the Roman Army: Essays in Honour of Margaret Roxan, London: 1–18.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R.(2005), The Roman Government of Britain, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birley, A. R.(2007), ‘The frontier zone in Britain: Hadrian to Caracalla’, in de Blois, L. and Lo Cascio, E. (eds.), The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC–AD 476), Leiden and New York: 355–70.Google Scholar

Birley, E. (1949), ‘The equestrian officers of the Roman army’, Durham University Journal 41: 8–19.Google Scholar

Birley, E.(1953), Roman Britain and the Roman Army, Kendal.Google Scholar

Birley, E.(1969), ‘Septimius Severus and the Roman army’, Epigraphische Studien 8: 63–82.Google Scholar

Birley, E.(1983), ‘A Roman altar from Old Kilpatrick and interim commanders of auxiliary units’, Latomus 42: 73–83.Google Scholar

Birley, E.(1986), ‘Some military inscriptions from Chester (Deva)’, ZPE 64: 201–8.Google Scholar

Birley, E.(1988), ‘Alae and cohortes milliariae’, in The Roman Army: Papers 1929–1986, Amsterdam: 349–64. (Originally published in Corolla Memoriae Erich Swoboda Dedicata, 1966: 54–67.)Google Scholar

Bispham, E. (2007), From Asculum to Actium: The Municipalization of Italy from the Social War to Augustus, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blanco-Pérez, A. (2016), ‘Nomenclature and dating in Roman Asia Minor: (M.) Aurelius/a and the 3rd century AD’, ZPE 199: 271–93.Google Scholar

Blanshard, A. J. L. (2010), ‘War in the law-court: some Athenian discussions’, in Pritchard, D. (ed.), War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens, Cambridge: 203–24.Google Scholar

Bleicken, J. (1957), ‘Oberpontifex und Pontifikalkollegium: eine Studie zur römischen Sakralverfassung’, Hermes 85: 346–66.Google Scholar

Bleicken, J.(1995), Cicero und die Ritter, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Bodel, J. (1999), ‘The Cena Trimalchionis’, in Hofmann, H. (ed.), Latin Fiction: The Novel in Context, London, 38–51.Google Scholar

Bodel, J.(2015), ‘Status dissonance and status dissidents in the equestrian order’, in Kuhn, A. B. (ed.), Social Status and Prestige in the Graeco-Roman World, Munich: 29–44.Google Scholar

Bodnaruk, M. (2016), ‘Administering the empire: the unmaking of an equestrian elite in the 4th century AD’, in Varga, R. and Rusu-Bolindet, V. (eds.), Official Power and Local Elites in the Roman Provinces, London: 145–67.Google Scholar

Bollinger, T. (1969), Theatralis Licentia: Die Publikumsdemonstrationen an den öffentlichen Spielen im Rom der früheren Kaiserzeit und ihre Bedeutung im politischen Leben, Winterthur.Google Scholar

Bond, S. (2016), ‘Currency and control: mint workers in the later Roman empire’, in Verboven, K. and Laes, C. (eds.), Work, Labour, and Professions in the Roman World, Leiden: 227–45.Google Scholar

Borg, B. E. (2012), ‘The face of the social climber: Roman freedmen and elite ideology’, in Bell, S. and Ramsby, T. (eds.), Free at Last! The Impact of Freed Slaves on the Roman Empire, London: 25–49.Google Scholar

Borg, B. E.(2013), Crisis and Ambition: Tombs and Burial Customs in Third-Century CE Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar

Borg, B. E. and Witschel, C. (2001), ‘Veränderungen im Repräsentationsverhalten der römischen Eliten während des 3. Jhs. n. Chr.’, in Alföldy, G. and Panciera, S. (eds.), Inschriftliche Denkmäler als Medien der Selbstdarstellung in der römischen Welt, Stuttgart: 47–120.Google Scholar

Bottomore, T. (1993), Élites and Society, 2nd edition, London.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. (1969), Greek Sophists in the Roman Empire, Oxford.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. (1970), ‘Greeks and their past in the Second Sophistic’, P&P 46: 3–41.Google Scholar

Bowie, E.(1982), ‘The importance of sophists’, YCS 27: 29–59.Google Scholar

Bowie, E.(2013), ‘Libraries for the Caesars’, in König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Ancient Libraries, Cambridge: 237–60.Google Scholar

Bowie, E.(2014), ‘Becoming wolf, staying sheep’, in Madsen, J. M. and Rees, R. (eds.), Roman Rule in Greek and Latin Writing: Double Vision, Leiden: 39–78.Google Scholar

Bowman, A. K. (1978), ‘The military occupation of Upper Egypt in the reign of Diocletian’, BASP 15: 25–38.Google Scholar

Bowman, A. K.(1996a), ‘Egypt’, in CAH X²: 676–702.Google Scholar

Bowman, A. K.(1996b), ‘Provincial administration and taxation’, in CAH X²: 344–70.Google Scholar

Bowman, A. K.(2005), ‘Diocletian and the first Tetrarchy, AD 284–305’, in CAH XII²: 67–89.Google Scholar

Bowman, A. K.(2006), ‘Outposts of empire: Vindolanda, Egypt, and the empire of Rome’, JRA 19: 75–93.Google Scholar

Bowman, A. K. and Thomas, J. D. (eds.) (2003), The Vindolanda Writing Tablets,Tabulae Vindolandenses 3, London.Google Scholar

Braund, D. (2000), ‘Learning, luxury and empire: Athenaeus’ Roman patron’, in Braund, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Athenaeus and His World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire, Exeter: 3–22.Google Scholar

Braund, S. M. (1996), Juvenal Satires Book 1, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Braund, S. M.(2009), Seneca: De Clementia, Oxford.Google Scholar

Breeze, D. J. (1974), ‘The organisation of the career structure of the immunes and principales of the Roman army’, Bonner Jahrbücher 174: 245–92.Google Scholar

Bremmer, J. N. (1995), ‘The family and other centres of religious learning in antiquity’, in Drijvers, J. W. and MacDonald, A. A. (eds.), Centres of Learning: Learning and Location in Pre-Modern Europe and the Near East, Leiden: 29–38.Google Scholar

Briant, P. (1999), ‘The Achaemenid empire’, in Raaflaub, K. and Rosenstein, N. (eds.), War and Society in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds: Asia, the Mediterranean, Europe, and Mesoamerica, Cambridge, MA: 105–28.Google Scholar

Bringmann, K. (1973), ‘Zur Gerichtsreform des Kaisers Augustus’, Chiron 3: 235–44.Google Scholar

Briscoe, J. (2008), A Commentary on Livy Books 38–40, Oxford.Google Scholar

Briscoe, J.(2012), A Commentary on Livy Books 41–45, Oxford.Google Scholar

Brock, R. and Hodkinson, S. (2001), ‘Introduction: alternatives to the democratic polis’, in Brock, R. and Hodkinson, S. (eds.), Alternatives to Athens: Varieties of Political Organization and Community in Ancient Greece, Oxford: 1–32.Google Scholar

Brown, P. (1992), Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity, Madison.Google Scholar

Brown, P.(2000), ‘The study of elites in late antiquity’, Arethusa 33: 321–46.Google Scholar

Brown, T. S. (1984), Gentlemen and Officers: Imperial Administration and Aristocratic Power in Byzantine Italy, AD 554–800, London.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1961), ‘The lex Valeria Cornelia’, JRS 51: 71–83.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A.(1971), Italian Manpower, 225 BC–AD 14, Oxford.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A.(1975), ‘The administrators of Roman Egypt’, JRS 65: 124–47.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A.(1983), ‘Princeps and equites’, JRS 73: 42–75.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A.(1988), The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays, Oxford.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A.(1990a), ‘Charges of provincial maladministration under the early principate’, in Brunt, P. A., Roman Imperial Themes, Oxford: 53–95, 487–506. (Revised version with addenda of the original in Historia 10 (1961), 189–227.)Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A.(1990b), ‘Procuratorial jurisdiction’, in Brunt, P. A., Roman Imperial Themes, Oxford: 163–87. (Revised version of the original in Latomus 25 (1966): 461–87.)Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A.(1990c), ‘Publicans in the principate’, in Brunt, P. A., Roman Imperial Themes, Oxford: 354–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunt, P. A.(1994), ‘The bubble of the Second Sophistic’, BICS 39: 25–52.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A.(2013), Studies in Stoicism, ed. Griffin, M. and Samuels, A. with Crawford, M., Oxford.Google Scholar

Bruun, C. (1991), The Water Supply of Ancient Rome: A Study of Roman Imperial Administration, Helsinki.Google Scholar

Bruun, C.(1999), ‘Imperial procuratores and dispensatores: new discoveries’, Chiron 29: 29–42.Google Scholar

Bruun, C.(2005), ‘Puzzles about procurators in Rome’, Arctos 39: 9–24.Google Scholar

Bruun, C.(2006), ‘Der Kaiser und die stadtrömischen curae: Geschichte und Bedeutung’, in Kolb, A. (ed.), Herrschaftsstrukturen und Herrschaftspraxis: Konzepte, Prinzipien und Strategien der Administration im römischen Kaiserreich, Berlin: 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruun, C.(2015), ‘Roman government and administration’, in Bruun, C. and Edmondson, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Epigraphy, Oxford: 274–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bumke, J. (1977), The Concept of Knighthood in the Middle Ages, trans. W. T. H. Jackson and E. Jackson, New York.Google Scholar

Buonocore, M. (1982), ‘Monumenti funerari romani con decorazione ad Alba Fucens’, MEFRA 94: 715–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buonopane, A. (2008), ‘Un dux ducum e un vir egregius nell’iscrizione di porta Borsari a Verona (CIL, V, 3329)’, in Basso, P. et al. (eds.), Est enim ille flos Italiae: Vita economica e soiale nella Cisalpina Romana, Rome: 125–36.Google Scholar

Burnand, C. (2004), ‘The advocate as a professional: the role of the patronus in Cicero’s Pro Cluentio’, in Powell, J. and Paterson, J. (eds.), Cicero the Advocate, Oxford: 277–90.Google Scholar

Burnett, A. (2012), ‘Early Roman coinage and its Italian context’, in Metcalf, W. E. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Coinage, Oxford: 297–314.Google Scholar

Burton, G. P. (1979), ‘The curator rei publicae: towards a reappraisal’, Chiron 9: 465–87.Google Scholar

Burton, G. P.(1993), ‘Provincial procurators and the public provinces’, Chiron 23: 13–28.Google Scholar

Byrne, S. (1999), ‘Pointed allusions: Maecenas and Sallustius in the Annals of Tacitus’, RhM 142: 339–45.Google Scholar

Caballos Rufino, A. (1988), ‘Cities as the basis for supraprovincial promotion: the equites of Baetica’, in Keay, S. J. (ed.), The Archaeology of Early Roman Baetica, Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 29, Portsmouth, RI: 123–46.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (2006), Sextus Propertius: The Augustan Elegist, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (2010), ‘The date of the Scholia vetustiora on Juvenal’, CQ 60: 569–76.Google Scholar

Cameron, A.(2011), The Last Pagans of Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. M. and Hall, S. G. (eds.) (1999), Eusebius: Life of Constantine, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camodeca, G. (1980–1), ‘Ricerche su Puteoli tardoromana (fine III–IV secolo)’, Puteoli 4–5: 59–128.Google Scholar

Camodeca, G.(1981), ‘La carriera del prefetto del pretorio Sex. Cornelius Repentinus in una nuova iscrizione puteolana’, ZPE 43: 43–56.Google Scholar

Campbell, B. (1984), The Emperor and the Roman Army, Oxford.Google Scholar

Campbell, B.(2005a), ‘The Army’, in CAH XII²: 110–30.Google Scholar

Campbell, B.(2005b), ‘The Severan Dynasty’, in CAH XII²: 1–27.Google Scholar

Campbell, B.(2007), ‘Anthony Birley’, CR 57: 184–6.Google Scholar

Campbell, V. L. (2015), The Tombs of Pompeii: Organization, Space, and Society, London.Google Scholar

Capponi, L. (2002), ‘Maecenas and Pollio’, ZPE 140: 181–4.Google Scholar

Carrié, J.-M. (1979), ‘Bryonianus Lollianus de Sidé ou les avatars de l’ordre équestre’, ZPE 35: 213–24.Google Scholar

Carter, J. M. (1982), Suetonius: Divus Augustus, Bristol.Google Scholar

Carter, M. J. (2003), ‘Gladiatorial ranking and the SC de Pretiis Gladiatorum Minuendis (CIL II 6278 = ILS 5163)’, Phoenix 57: 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, M. J.(2009), ‘Gladiators and monomachoi: Greek attitudes to a Roman cultural performance’, International Journal of the History of Sport 26: 298–322.Google Scholar

Casanova, G. (2008), ‘“A caval donato … .”: P. Hib. II 274 riesaminato’, Aegyptus 88: 127–36.Google Scholar

Castagnoli, F. (1949/50), ‘Sul limite di età degli equites’, Bullettino della Comissione Archeologica Comunale di Roma 73: 89–90.Google Scholar

Castagnoli, F.(1972), Lavinium I: Topograpfia generale, fonti e storia delle ricerche, Rome.Google Scholar

Cenerini, F. (1989), ‘Notabili e famiglie curiali sestinati’, in Sestinum: Comunità antiche dell’Appennino tra Etruria e Adriatico, Rimini: 189–98.Google Scholar

Champlin, E. (2003), Nero, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Champlin, E.(2011), ‘Tiberius and the heavenly twins’, JRS 101: 73–99.Google Scholar

Chaniotis, A. and Fujii, T. (2015), ‘A new fragment of Diocletian’s currency regulation from Aphrodisias’, JRS 105: 227–33.Google Scholar

Chastagnol, A. (1966), ‘Un gouverneur constantinien de Tripolitaine: Laenatius Romulus, praeses en 324–326’, Latomus 25: 539–52.Google Scholar

Chastagnol, A.(1970), ‘L’évolution de l’ordre sénatorial aux IIIe et IVe siècles de notre ère’, RH 244: 305–14.Google Scholar

Chastagnol, A.(1975), ‘Latus clavus et adlectio: l’accès des hommes nouveaux au sénat romain sous le Haut-Empire’, RHD 53: 375–94.Google Scholar

Chastagnol, A.(1988), ‘La fin de l’ordre équestre: reflexions sur la prosopographie des derniers chevaliers romains’, MEFRM 100: 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chastagnol, A.(1992), Le sénat romain à l’époque imperial, Paris.Google Scholar

Chenault, R. (2012), ‘Statues of senators in the Forum of Trajan and the Roman Forum in Late Antiquity’, JRS 102: 103–32.Google Scholar

Chenu, M.-D. (1968), Nature, Man, and Society in the Twelfth Century: Essays on New Theological Perspectives in the Latin West, ed. and trans. Taylor, J. and Little, L. K., Chicago.Google Scholar

Cheynet, J.-C. (2006), ‘The Byzantine aristocracy (8th–13th centuries)’, in Cheynet, J.-C., The Byzantine Aristocracy and its Military Function, Aldershot: 1–43.Google Scholar

Christol, M. (1976), ‘Une carrière équestre sous le règne de l’empereur Gallien’, Latomus 35: 866–74.Google Scholar

Christol, M.(1977), ‘La carrière de Traianus Mucianus et l’origine des protectores’, Chiron 7: 393–408.Google Scholar

Christol, M.(1978), ‘A propos des Aradii: le stemma d’une famille sénatoriale au IIIe siècle ap. J-C.’, ZPE 28: 145–50.Google Scholar

Christol, M.(1982), ‘Les réformes de Gallien et la carrière sénatoriale’, in Panciera, S. (ed.), Epigrafia e ordine senatorio I, Rome: 143–66.Google Scholar

Christol, M.(1986), Essai sur l’évolution des carrières sénatoriales dans la seconde moitié du IIIe siècle ap. J.C., Paris.Google Scholar

Christol, M.(1997), ‘M. Simplicinius Genialis: ses fonctions (vir perfectissimus, agens vice praesidis)’, CCG 8: 231–41.Google Scholar

Christol, M.(1999), ‘L’ascension de l’ordre équestre: un thème historiographique et sa rèalité’, in Demougin, S., Devijver, H. and Raepsaet-Charlier, M. T. (eds.), L’ordre équestre: histoire d’une aristocratie (IIe siècle av. J.-C.–IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.), Rome: 613–28.Google Scholar

Christol, M.(2003), ‘Les gouverneurs de Numidie sous Valérien et Gallien et l’histoire militaire de la province entre 253 et 260’, L’Antiquité classique 72: 141–59.Google Scholar

Christol, M.(2006a), ‘L’administration et la gestion des ressources de la province d’Afrique à la transition du Haut-Empire et du Bas-Empire’, CCG 17: 219–46.Google Scholar

Christol, M.(2006b), ‘Vir centenarius’, ZPE 158: 243–50.Google Scholar

Christol, M. and Demougin, S. (1984), ‘Notes de prosopographie équestre II: Gens Ostoria’, ZPE 57: 171–8.Google Scholar

Christol, M. and Drew-Bear, T. (2004), ‘Caracalla et son médecin L. Gellius Maximus à Antioche de Piside’, in Colvin, S. (ed.), The Greco-Roman East: Politics, Culture, Society, Yale Classical Studies 31, Cambridge: 85–118.Google Scholar

Clarke, G. W. (1964), ‘The destinatio centuries in AD 14’, Historia 13: 383–4.Google Scholar

Clarke, G. W. (ed.) (1989), The Letters of St. Cyprian of Carthage, IV, New York.Google Scholar

Classen, C. J. (1978), ‘Cicero, the laws, and the law-courts’, Latomus 37: 597–619.Google Scholar

Clinton, K. (2001), ‘Initiates in the Samothracian Mysteries, September 4, 100 BC’, Chiron 31: 27–35.Google Scholar

Cloud, D. (1992), ‘The constitution and public criminal law’, in CAH IX²: 491–530.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. (1984), ‘Iside Capitolina, Clodio e i mercanti di schiavi’, in Bonoacasa, N. and di Vita, A. (eds.), Alessandria e il Mondo ellenistico-romano: Studi in onore di Achille Adriani, Rome: 461–75.Google Scholar

Cohen, B. (1975), ‘La notion d’ordo dans la Rome antique’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé, 259–82.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (1988), Statius: Silvae IV, Oxford.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M.(2006), Martial: Liber Spectaculorum, Oxford.Google Scholar

Coles, R. (1985), ‘Caecilius [Cons]ultius, Praefectus Aegypti’, BASP 22: 25–7.Google Scholar

Colton, R. E. (1966), ‘Juvenal and Martial on the Equestrian Order’, CJ 61: 157–9.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. E. (2000), ‘Politics and religion in the ager Laurens’, in Cooley, A. E. (ed.), The Epigraphic Landscape of Roman Italy, London: 173–91.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. E.(2012), The Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. E. (ed. and trans.) (2009), Res Gestae Divi Augusti: Text, Translation, and Commentary, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. E. and Cooley, M. G. L. (2014), Pompeii and Herculaneum: A Sourcebook, 2nd edition, London.Google Scholar

Corbier, M. (1982), ‘Les familles clarissimes d’Afrique proconsulaire (Ier–IIIe siècle)’, in Panciera, S. (ed.), Epigrafia e ordine senatorio II, Rome: 685–754.Google Scholar

Corbier, M.(2005), ‘Coinage and taxation: the state’s point of view’, in CAH XII²: 327–92.Google Scholar

Corcoran, S. (2000), The Empire of the Tetrarchs: Imperial Pronouncements and Government, AD 284–324, revised edition, Oxford.Google Scholar

Corcoran, S.(2006), ‘Before Constantine’, in Lenski, N. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine, Cambridge: 35–58.Google Scholar

Corcoran, S.(2007) ‘Galerius’s jigsaw puzzle: the Caesariani dossier’, AntTard 15: 221–50.Google Scholar

Corcoran, S.(2012) ‘Emperors and Caesariani inside and outside the Code’, in Crogiez-Pétrequin, S. and Jaillette, P. (eds.), Société, économie, administration dans le Code Théodosien, Villeneuve d’Ascq: 265–84.Google Scholar

Corcoran, S.(2016), ‘The Codex of Justinian: the life of a text through 1,500 years’, in Frier, B. W. (ed.), The Codex of Justinian: A New Annonated Translation, with Parallel Latin and Greek Text, Cambridge: xcvii–clxiv.Google Scholar

Cormack, S. (2007), ‘The tombs of Pompeii’, in Dobbins, J. J. and Foss, P. W. (eds.), The World of Pompeii, London: 585–606.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (1995), The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c.1000–264 BC), London.Google Scholar

Cornwell, H. (2015), ‘The king who would be prefect: authority and identity in the Cottian Alps’, JRS 105: 41–72.Google Scholar

Cosme, P. (2007), ‘À propos de l’édit de Gallien’, in Hekster, O., de Kleijn, G. and Slootjes, D. (eds.), Crises and the Roman Empire: Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire, Nijmegen, June 20–24, 2006, Leiden and Boston: 97–110.Google Scholar

Cottier, M. et al. (eds.) (2008), The Customs of Law of Asia, Oxford.Google Scholar

Cotton, H. M. (1981), ‘Military tribunates and the exercise of patronage’, Chiron 11: 229–38.Google Scholar

Cotton, H. M.(1985), ‘Mirificum genus commendationis: Cicero and the Latin letter of recommendation’, AJPh 106: 328–34.Google Scholar

Cotton, H. M.(2000), ‘Cassius Dio, Mommsen, and the quinquefascales’, Chiron 30: 217–34.Google Scholar

Coulston, J. (2007), ‘Art, culture and service: the depiction of soldiers on funerary monuments of the 3rd century AD’, in de Blois, L. and Lo Cascio, E. (eds.), The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC–AD 476): Economic, Social, Political, Religious and Cultural Aspects, Leiden: 529–65.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. H. (2002), ‘Aspects of the Severan Field Army: The Praetorian Guard, Legio II Parthica, and Legionary Vexillations, AD 193–238’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. (1985), Coinage and Money under the Roman Republic: Italy and the Mediterranean Economy, London.Google Scholar

Crawford, M.(1992), The Roman Republic, 2nd edition, London.Google Scholar

Crawford, M.(2000), ‘Italy and Rome from Sulla to Augustus’, in CAH X²: 414–33.Google Scholar

Crawford, M.(2001), ‘Review of J. Bleicken, Cicero und die Ritter’, CR 51: 431–3.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. (ed.) (1996), Roman Statutes, London.Google Scholar

Cresci, G. (1995), ‘Maecenas, equitum decus’, RSA 25: 169–76.Google Scholar

Criniti, N. (1970), L’epigrafe di Asculum di Gn. Pompeo Strabone, Milan.Google Scholar

Crone, P. (1980), Slaves on Horses: The Evolution of the Islamic Polity, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crone, P.(2003), Pre-Industrial Societies: Anatomy of the Pre-Modern World, 2nd edition, Oxford.Google Scholar

Crook, J. (1955), Consilium Principis, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Crowther, N. B. (2009), ‘Observations on boys, girls, youths and age categories in Roman sports and spectacles’, International Journal of the History of Sport 26: 343–64.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (2001), ‘Note esegetiche, linguistiche e testuali su papiri latini’, Aegyptus 81: 307–21.Google Scholar

D’Agostino, B. (1990), ‘Military organization and social structure in archaic Etruria’, in Murray, O. and Price, S. (eds.), The Greek City from Homer to Alexander, Oxford: 59–82.Google Scholar

D’Ambrosio, E. and De Caro, S. (1983), Un impegno per Pompei: fotopiano e documentazione della necropoli di Porta Nocera, Milan.Google Scholar

D’Arms, J. (1972), ‘A new inscribed base from fourth-century Puteoli’, PP 27: 255–70.Google Scholar

D’Arms, J.(1981), Commerce and Social Standing in Ancient Rome, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

D’Arms, J.(1988), ‘Pompeii and Rome in the Augustan age and beyond: the eminence of the gens Holconia’, in Curtis, R. I. (ed.), Studia Pompeiana et Classica in Honour of Wilhelmina F. Jashemski, New Rochelle: 51–74.Google Scholar

Daguet-Gagey, A. (2011), ‘Auguste et la naissance des services publics à Rome’, in Benoist, S. et al. (eds.), Figures d’empire, fragments de mémoire: pouvoirs et identités dans le monde romain impérial IIe s. av. n. è–VI s. de n. è., Lille: 341–60.Google Scholar

Dakouras, P. (2006), ‘Maecenas Eques: A Study in the Creation and Development of an Image’, Ph.D. thesis, New York University.Google Scholar

Davenport, C. (2009), ‘The Senatorial and Equestrian Orders in the Roman Army and Administration, AD 235–337’, D.Phil. thesis, Oxford University.Google Scholar

Davenport, C.(2010), ‘The building inscription from the fort at Udruh and Aelius Flavianus, Tetrarchic praeses of Palaestina’, JRA 23: 349–57.Google Scholar

Davenport, C.(2012a), ‘Cassius Dio and Caracalla’, CQ 62: 796–815.Google Scholar

Davenport, C.(2012b), ‘Soldiers and equestrian rank in the third century AD’, PBSR 80: 89–123.Google Scholar

Davenport, C.(2012c), ‘The provincial appointments of the emperor Macrinus’, Antichthon 46: 184–203.Google Scholar

Davenport, C.(2013), ‘The governors of Achaia under Diocletian and Constantine’, ZPE 184: 225–34.Google Scholar

Davenport, C.(2014a), ‘M. Claudius Tacitus: senator or soldier?’, Latomus 73: 174–87.Google Scholar

Davenport, C.(2014b), ‘The conduct of Vitellius in Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, Historia 63: 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davenport, C.(2015a), ‘Inscribing senatorial status and identity, AD 200–350’, in Kuhn, A. B. (ed.), Social Status and Prestige in the Graeco-Roman World, Stuttgart: 269–89.Google Scholar

Davenport, C.(2015b), ‘The prefecture of Caecilius [Cons]ultius’, BASP 52: 275–81.Google Scholar

Davenport, C.(2016), ‘Fashioning a soldier emperor: Maximian, Pannonia, and the panegyrics of 289 and 291’, Phoenix 70: 381–400.Google Scholar

Davenport, C.(forthcoming), ‘The end of the militiae equestres’, in Rathbone, D. and Wilson, A. (eds.), Documents and the Mechanics of Roman Rule, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Davenport, C. and Manley, J. (eds.) (2014), Fronto: Selected Letters, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, P. J. E. (2000), Death and the Emperor: Roman Imperial Funerary Monuments from Augustus to Marcus Aurelius, Austin.Google Scholar

Davies, R. W. (1989), Service in the Roman Army, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

de Angelis, F. (2010), ‘The emperor’s justice and its spaces in Rome and Italy’, in de Angelis, F. (ed.), Spaces of Justice in the Roman World, Leiden: 127–59.Google Scholar

de Blois, L. (1976), The Policy of the Emperor Gallienus, Leiden.Google Scholar

de Blois, L.(1994), ‘Sueton, Aug. 46 und die Manipulation des mittleren Militärkaders als politisches Instrument’, Historia 43: 324–45.Google Scholar

de Blois, L.(2001), ‘Roman jurists and the crisis of the third century AD in the Roman empire’, in de Blois, L. (ed.), Administration, Prosopography and Appointment Policies in the Roman Empire, Amsterdam: 136–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Ste. Croix, G. E. M. (1981), The Class Struggle in the Archaic Age to the Arab Conquests, London.Google Scholar

Delmaire, R. (1989), Largesses sacrées et res privata: l’aerarium impérial et son administration du IVe au VIe siècle, Rome.Google Scholar

Demandt, A. (1980), ‘Der spätrömische Militäradel’, Chiron 10: 609–36.Google Scholar

Demougin, S. (1980), ‘Eques: un surnom bien romain’, Annali del Seminario di Studi del Mondo Classico, Archeologia e Storia Antica 2: 158–69.Google Scholar

Demougin, S.(1983), ‘Notables municipaux et ordre équestre à l’époque des dernières guerres civiles’, in Les ‘bourgeoisies’ municipales italiennes aux IIe et Ier siècles av. J.C., Paris: 279–98.Google Scholar

Demougin, S.(1988), L’ordre équestre sous les Julio-Claudiens, Rome.Google Scholar

Demougin, S.(1992a), Prosopographie des chevaliers romains julio-claudiens (43 av. J.-C.–70 ap. J.-C.), Rome.Google Scholar

Demougin, S.(1992b), ‘Un proposition de restitution des lignes 54 à 57 de la Tabula Hebana’, Athenaeum 80: 65–77.Google Scholar

Demougin, S.(1993), ‘Appartenir à l’ordre équestre au IIème siècle’, in Eck, W. (ed.), Prosopographie und Sozialgeschichte: Studien zur Methodik und Erkenntnismoglichkeit der kaiserzeitlichen Prosopographie, Cologne: 233–50.Google Scholar

Demougin, S.(1994), ‘L’ordre équestre sous Domitien’, Pallas 40: 289–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demougin, S.(1999), ‘L’ordre équestre en Asie mineure: histoire d’une romanisation’, in Demougin, S., Devijver, H. and Raepsaet-Charlier, M.-T. (eds.), L’ordre équestre: histoire d’une aristocratie (IIe siècle av. J.-C.–IIIe siècle ap. J.-C., Rome: 579–612.Google Scholar

Demougin, S.(2001), ‘Considérations sur l’avancement dans les carriéres procuratoriennes équestres’, in de Blois, L. (ed.), Administration, Prosopography and Appointment Policies in the Roman Empire, Amsterdam: 24–34.Google Scholar

Demougin, S.(2007), ‘L’administration procuratorienne au quotidien: affaires de chancellerie’, in Haensch, R. and Heinrichs, J. (eds.), Herrschen und Verwalten: Der Alltag der römischen Administration in der Hohen Kaiserzeit, Cologne: 271–88.Google Scholar

Demougin, S.(2015), ‘Titres officiels, titres officieux’, in Kuhn, A. B. (ed.), Social Status and Prestige in the Graeco-Roman World, Munich: 63–85.Google Scholar

Dench, E. (2005), Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian, Oxford.Google Scholar

Dench, E.(2013), ‘Cicero and Roman Identity’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, Cambridge: 122–38.Google Scholar

Develin, R. (1987), ‘Sulla and the senate’, AHB 1: 130–4.Google Scholar

Devijver, H. (1968), ‘Die Aufgabe eines Offiziers im römischen Heer: Kommentar zu Aemilius Macer, Dig. XLIX, xvi, 12, 2’, in Cerfaux, J. (ed.), Antidorum W. Peremans sexagenario ab alumnis oblatum, Studia Hellenistica 16, Leuven: 23–37.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1970), ‘Suétone, Claude, 25, et les milices équestres’, Ancient Society 1: 69–81.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1972), ‘The career of M. Porcius Narbonensis (CIL II 4239): new evidence for the reorganization of the militiae equestres by the emperor Claudius?’, Ancient Society 3: 165–91.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1976–2001), Prosopographia militiarum equestrium quae fuerunt ab Augusto ad Gallienum, 6 vols., Leuven.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1986a), ‘Equestrian officers from the East’, in Freeman, P. and Kennedy, D. (eds.), The Defence of the Roman and Byzantine East, Oxford: 109–225.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1986b), ‘T. Flavius Mikkalus, Ritteroffizier aus Perinthos’, ZPE 64: 253–6.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1988), ‘Les militiae equestres de P. Helvius Pertinax’, ZPE 75: 207–14.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1989a), ‘Equestrian officers and their monuments’, in Devijver, H., The Equestrian Officers of the Roman Imperial Army, Amsterdam: 416–49.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1989b), ‘Equestrian officers in the East’, in French, D. H. and Lightfoot, C. S. (eds.), The Eastern Frontier of the Roman Empire, Oxford: 77–111.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1989c), ‘Some observations on Greek terminology for the militiae equestres in the literary, epigraphical and papyrological sources’, in Devijver, H., The Equestrian Officers of the Roman Imperial Army, Amsterdam: 56–72. (Originally published in Zetesis. Album amicorum E. de Strycker, Antwerp–Utrecht (1973): 549–65.)Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1989d), ‘The geographical origins of equestrian officers’, Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology 26: 107–26.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1991a), ‘Equestrian officers from North Africa’, L’Africa Romana 8: 127–201.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1991b), ‘The monument of the equestrian officer Cn. Petronius Asellio (CIL XIII 6816 – Mogontiacum)’, Ancient Society 22: 245–54.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1992), ‘Successoribus acceptis militare desinunt (Digesta, XXVIIII, 1, 21)’, in Devijver, H., The Equestrian Officers of the Roman Imperial Army: Volume II, Stuttgart: 212–21.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1993), ‘Veränderungen in der Zusammensetzung der ritterlichen Offiziere von Septimius Severus bis Gallienus’, in Eck, W. (ed.), Prosopographie und Sozialgeschichte, Cologne: 205–31.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1995), ‘Les milices équestres et la hiérarchie militaire’, in Le Bohec, Y. (ed.), La hiérarchie (Rangordnung) de l’armée romaine sous le haut-empire, Paris: 175–91.Google Scholar

Devijver, H.(1999), ‘Les relations sociales des chevaliers romains’, in Demougin, S., Devijver, H. and Raepsaet-Charlier, M.-T. (eds.), L’ordre équestre: histoire d’une aristocratie (IIe siècle av. J.-C.–IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.), Rome: 237–69.Google Scholar

Devijver, H. and van Wonterghem, F. (1990), ‘The funerary monuments of equestrian officers of the late Republic and early empire in Italy (50 BC–100 AD)’, Ancient Society 21: 59–98.Google Scholar

Dietz, K. (1980), Senatus contra principem, Munich.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. N. (2012), The Justice of Constantine: Law, Communication, and Control, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. N.(2015), ‘The inflation of rank and privilege: regulating precedence in the fourth century AD’, in Wienand, J. (ed.), Contested Monarchy: Integrating the Roman Empire in the Fourth Century AD, New York: 42–66.Google Scholar

Dimitrova, N. M. (2008), Theoroi and Initiates in Samothrace: The Epigraphical Evidence, Hesperia Supplements 37, Princeton.Google Scholar

Dobson, B. (1966), ‘The praefectus fabrum in the early principate’, in Jarrett, M. G. and Dobson, B. (eds.), Britain and Rome: Essays Presented to Eric Birley on his Sixtieth Birthday, Kendal: 61–84.Google Scholar

Dobson, B.(1970), ‘The centurionate and social mobility during the principate’, in Nicolet, C. (ed.), Recherches sur les structures sociales dans l’Antiquité classique, Paris: 99–115.Google Scholar

Dobson, B.(1972), ‘Legionary centurion or equestrian officer? A comparison of pay and prospects’, Ancient Society 3: 193–207.Google Scholar

Dobson, B.(1974), ‘The significance of the centurion and primipilaris in the Roman army and administration’, in ANRW II.I: 392–434.Google Scholar

Dobson, B.(1978), Die Primipilares: Entwicklung und Bedeutung, Laufbahnen und Persönlichkeiten eines römischen Offiziersranges, Bonn.Google Scholar

Dobson, B.(1982), ‘Praefectus castrorum Aegypti: a reconsideration’, CdÉ 57: 322–7.Google Scholar

Dobson, B.(2000), ‘The primipilares in army and society’, in Alföldy, G., Dobson, B. and Eck, W. (eds.), Kaiser, Heer, und Gesellschaft in der Römischen Kaiserzeit: Gedenkschrift für Eric Birley, Stuttgart: 139–52.Google Scholar

Dobson, B. and Breeze, D. J. (1969), ‘The Rome cohorts and the legionary centuriate’, Epigraphische Studien 8: 100–24.Google Scholar

Donati, A. (1989), ‘La produzione epigrafica sestinate’, in Sestinum: Comunità antiche dell’Appennino tra Etruria e Adriatico, Rimini: 167–74.Google Scholar

Drew-Bear, T. (1977), ‘A fourth-century Latin soldier’s epitaph from Nakolea’, HSPh 81: 257–74.Google Scholar

Drew-Bear, T., Malay, H. and Zuckerman, C. (2004), ‘L’épitaph de Valeria, veuve du tribun Dassianus’, in Le Bohec, Y. and Wolff, C. (eds.), L’armée romaine de Dioclétien à Valentinien Ier: Acts du Congrès de Lyon, 12–14 Septembre 2002, Lyons: 409–18.Google Scholar

Drews, R. (2004), Early Riders: The Beginnings of Mounted Warfare in Asia and Europe, London.Google Scholar

Drijvers, J. W. (1991), Helena Augusta: The Mother of Constantine the Great and the Legend of her Finding of the True Cross, Leiden.Google Scholar

Drinkwater, J. F. (1987), The Gallic Empire: Separatism and Continuity in the North-Western Provinces of the Roman Empire, AD 260–274, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Drinkwater, J. F.(2005), ‘Maximinus to Diocletian and the “Crisis”’, in CAH XII²: 28–66.Google Scholar

Drinkwater, J. F.(2007), The Alamanni and Rome 213–496: Caracalla to Clovis, Oxford.Google Scholar

Drogula, F. K. (2015), Commanders and Command in the Roman Republic and Early Empire, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Duby, G. (1976), ‘Die Ursprünge des Rittertums’, in Borst, A. (ed.), Das Rittertum im Mittelalter, Darmstadt: 349–69.Google Scholar

Duby, G.(1980), The Three Orders: Feudal Society Imagined, trans. A. Goldhammer, Chicago.Google Scholar

Dumézil, G. (1958), ‘Les pisciculi des Volcanalia’, REL 36: 121–30.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, R. P. (1963), ‘Wealth and munificence in Roman Africa’, PBSR 31: 159–77.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, R. P.(1967), ‘Equestrian rank in the cities of the African provinces under the principate: an epigraphic survey’, PBSR 35: 147–86.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, R. P.(1982), The Economy of the Roman Empire: Quantitative Studies, 2nd edition, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, R. P.(1990), Structure and Scale in the Roman Economy, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, R. P.(1994), Money and Government in the Roman Empire, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, R. P.(2006), ‘Who were the equites?’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History XIII, Brussels: 183–223.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, R. P.(2016), Power and Privilege in Roman Society, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Durry, M. (1938), Les cohortes prétoriennes, Paris.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (ed.) (2008), Cicero: Catilinarians, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R.(2010), Cicero: Pro Sexto Roscio, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R.(2013), Cicero: Pro Marco Caelio, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dyson, S. L. (1992), Community and Society in Roman Italy, Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (1974), ‘Beförderungskriterien innerhalb der senatorischen Laufbahn, dargestellt an der Zeit von 69 bis 138 n. Chr.’, in ANRW II.1: 158–228.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(1979a), Die staatliche Organisation Italiens in der hohen Kaiserzeit, Munich.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(1979b), ‘Iscrizioni nuove dall’Etruria meridionale’, Epigraphica 41: 89–118.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(1982), ‘Einfluß korrupter Praktiken auf das senatorisch-ritterliche Beförderungswesen in der Hohen Kaiserzeit?’ in Schuller, W. (ed.), Korruption im Alterum, Munich: 135–51.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(1984), ‘Senatorial self-representation: developments in the Augustan period’, in Millar, F. and Segal, E. (eds.), Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects, Oxford: 129–67.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(1985), Die Statthalter der germanischen Provinzen vom 1.–3. Jahrhundert, Cologne.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(1988), ‘Die Leitung und Verwaltung einer prokuratorischen Provinz’, in Vacchina, M. (ed.), La valle d’Aosta et l’arco alpino nella politica del mondo antico, St Vincent: 102–17.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(1989), ‘Religion und Religiosität in der soziopolitischen Führungsschicht der Hohen Kaiserzeit’, in Eck, W. (ed.), Religion und Gesellschaft in der römischen Kaiserzeit: Kolloquium zu Ehren von Friedrich Vittinghoff, Cologne and Vienna: 15–51.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(1995), ‘“Tituli honorarii”, curriculum vitae und Selbstdarstellung in der Hohen Kaiserzeit’, in Solin, H. (ed.), Acta colloquii epigraphici Latini Helsingiae 3.−6. sept. 1991 habiti, Helsinki: 211–37.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(1997), ‘Zu kleinasiatischen Inschriften (Ephesos; Museum Bursa)’, ZPE 117: 107–16.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(1999a), ‘Ordo equitum romanorum, ordo libertorum: Freigelassene und ihre Nachkommen im römischen Ritterstand’, in Demougin, S., Devijver, H. and Raepsaet-Charlier, M.-T. (eds.), L’ordre équestre: histoire d’une aristocratie (IIe siècle av. J.-C.–IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.), Rome: 5–29.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(1999b), ‘The Bar Kokhba revolt: the Roman point of view’, JRS 89: 76–89.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(2000), ‘Government and civil administration’, in CAH XI²: 195–292.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(2001), ‘Spezialisierung in der staatlichen Administration des Römischen Reiches in der Hohen Kaiserzeit’, in de Blois, L. (ed.), Administration, Prosopography and Appointment Policies in the Roman Empire, Amsterdam: 1–23.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(2002a), ‘Imperial administration and epigraphy: in defence of prosopography’, in Bowman, A. K. et al. (eds.), Representations of Empire: Rome and the Mediterranean World, Proceedings of the British Academy 114, Oxford: 131–52.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(2002b), ‘Prosopographische Bemerkungen zum Militärdiplom vom 20. 12. 202 n. Chr.: Der Flottenpräfekt Aemilius Sullectinus und das Gentilnomen des Usurpators Regalianus’, ZPE 139: 208–10.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(2005), ‘Auf der Suche nach Personen und Persönlichkeiten: Cursus honorum und Biographie’, in Vössing, K. (ed.), Biographie und Prosopographie: Internationales Kolloquium zum 65. Geburtstag von Anthony R. Birley, Stuttgart: 53–72.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(2006a), ‘Der Kaiser und seine Ratgeber: Überlegungen zum inneren Zusammenhang von amici, comites und consiliarii am römischen Kaiserhof’, in Kolb, A. (ed.), Herrschaftsstrukturen und Herrschaftspraxis: Konzepte, Prinzipien und Strategien der Administration im römischen Kaiserreich, Berlin: 67–77.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(2006b), ‘Sozio-politische Macht und öffentliche Repräsentation: der equester ordo’, in Demougin, S., Loriot, X., Cosme, P. and Lefebvre, S. (eds.), H.-G. Pflaum, un historien du XXe siècle, Geneva: 485–502.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(2008), ‘Die Benennung von römischen Amtsträgern und politisch–militärisch–administrativen Funktionen bei Flavius Iosephus: Probleme der korrekten Identifizierung’, ZPE 166: 218–26.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(2009a), ‘The administrative reforms of Augustus: pragmatism or systematic planning?’ in Edmondson, J. (ed.), Augustus, Edinburgh: 229–49.Google Scholar

Eck, W.(2009b), ‘There are no cursus honorum inscriptions: the function of the cursus honorum in epigraphic communication’, SCI 28: 79–92.Google Scholar

Eck, W. and Lieb, H. (1993), ‘Ein Diplom für die classis Ravennas vom 22. November 206’, ZPE 96: 75–88.Google Scholar

Eck, W. and Pangerl, A. (2011), ‘Drei Konstitutionen im Jahr 123 für Truppen von Dacia Porolissensis unter dem Präsidialprokurator Livius Gratus’, ZPE 176: 234–42.Google Scholar

Edmondson, J. (1992), Dio: The Julio-Claudians. Selections from Books 58–63 of the Roman History of Cassius Dio, London.Google Scholar

Edmondson, J.(1996), ‘Dynamic arenas: gladiatorial presentations in the city of Rome and the construction of Roman society during the early empire’, in Slater, W. J. (ed.), Roman Theatre and Society: E. Togo Salmon Papers 1, Ann Arbor: 69–112.Google Scholar

Edmondson, J.(2002), ‘Public spectacles and Roman social relations’, in Nogales Basarrate, T. and Castellanos, A. (eds.), Ludi Romani: Espectáculos en Hispania Romana, Madrid: 9–29.Google Scholar

Edmondson, J.(2008), ‘Public dress and social control in late Republican and early imperial Rome’, in Edmondson, J. and Keith, A. (eds.), Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture, Toronto: 21–46.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (1997), ‘Unspeakable professions: public performance and prostitution in ancient Rome’, in Hallett, J. and Skinner, M. (eds.), Ancient Sexualities, Princeton: 66–95.Google Scholar

Edwell, P. M. (2008), Between Rome and Persia: The Middle Euphrates, Mesopotamia and Palmyra under Roman Control, London.Google Scholar

Eich, P. (2005), Zur Metamorphose des politischen Systems in der römischen Kaiserzeit: Die Entstehung einer ‘personalen Bürokratie’ im langen dritten Jahrhundert, Berlin.Google Scholar

Eich, P.(2007), ‘Die Administratoren des römischen Äegyptens’, in Haensch, R. and Heinrichs, J. (eds.), Herrschen und Verwalten: Der Alltag der römischen Administration in der Hohen Kaiserzeit, Cologne: 378–99.Google Scholar

Eich, P.(2015), ‘The common denominator: late Roman imperial bureaucracy from a comparative perspective’, in Scheidel, W. (ed.), State Power in Ancient Rome and China, Oxford: 90–149.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, S. N. (1993), The Political Systems of Empires, revised edition, New Brunswick and London.Google Scholar

Elias, N. (1982), The Civilizing Process, vol. II: State Formation and Civilization, Oxford.Google Scholar

Elias, N.(1983), The Court Society, trans. E. Jephcott, Oxford.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (1998), Imperial Rome and Christian Triumph, Oxford.Google Scholar

Ensslin, W. (1937), ‘Perfectissimus’, in RE XIX.1: 664–83.Google Scholar

Ensslin, W.(1939), ‘The end of the principate”, in CAH XII¹: 352–82.Google Scholar

Erdkamp, P. (1995), ‘The corn supply of the Roman armies during the third and second centuries BC’, Historia 44: 168–91.Google Scholar

Erdkamp, P.(2005), The Grain Market in the Roman Empire: A Social, Political and Economic Study, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erskine, A. (2001), Troy between Greece and Rome: Local Tradition and Imperial Power, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, J. K. (1978), ‘The role of suffragium in imperial political decision-making: a Flavian example’, Historia 27: 102–28.Google Scholar

Evans Grubbs, J. (1993), ‘“Marriage more shameful than adultery”: slave–mistress relationships, “mixed marriages” and late Roman law’, Phoenix 47: 125–54.Google Scholar

Evans Grubbs, J.(1995), Law and Family in Late Antiquity: The Emperor Constantine’s Marriage Legislation, Oxford.Google Scholar

Everdell, W. R. (2000), The End of Kings: A History of Republics and Republicans, revised edition, Chicago.Google Scholar

Ewald, B. (2004), ‘Men, muscle, and myth: Attic sarcophagi in the cultural context of the Second Sophistic’, in Borg, B. E. (ed.), Paideia: The World of the Second Sophistic, Berlin: 229–75.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2004), The Roman World of Cicero’s De Oratore, Oxford.Google Scholar

Fantham, E.(2013), Cicero’s Pro L. Murena Oratio, Oxford.Google Scholar

Faoro, D. (2011), Praefectus, procurator, praeses: Genesi delle cariche presidiali equestri nell’Alto Impero Romani, Florence and Milan.Google Scholar

Farris, W. W. (1999), ‘Japan to 1300’, in Raaflaub, K. and Rosenstein, N. (eds.), War and Society in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds: Asia, the Mediterranean, Europe, and Mesoamerica, Cambridge, MA: 47–70.Google Scholar

Feissel, D. and Gascou, J. (1995), ‘Documents d’archives romains inédits du moyen Euphrate’, Journal des Savants: 65–119.Google Scholar

Fenelli, M. (1998), ‘Lavinium’, in Drago Troccoli, L. (ed.), Scavi e ricerche archeologiche dell’Università di Roma ‘La Sapienza’, Rome: 109–19.Google Scholar

Ferguson, R. B. (1999), ‘A paradigm for the study of war and society’, in Raaflaub, K. and Rosenstein, N. (eds.), War and Society in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds: Asia, the Mediterranean, Europe, and Mesoamerica, Cambridge, MA: 389–437.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. (1980), ‘Pline, N. H. XXXIII, 34, et les chevaliers Romains sous la République’, REL 58: 313–37.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L.(1991), ‘Lex Cornelia de sicariis et veneficiis’, Athenaeum 79: 417–34.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L.(2009), ‘The powers of Augustus’, in Edmondson, J. (ed.), Augustus, Edinburgh: 90–136.Google Scholar

Ferriès, M. (2009), ‘Luperci et Lupercalia de César à Auguste’, Latomus 68: 373–92.Google Scholar

Fink, R. O. (1971), Roman Military Records on Papyrus, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Finley, M. I. (1999), The Ancient Economy, updated edition with a new foreword by I. Morris, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Firpo, G. (1985), ‘CIL XI 6011 e la grande rivolta dalmatico-pannonica del 6–9 d. C.’, Epigraphica 47: 21–33.Google Scholar

Fishwick, D. (1987), The Imperial Cult in the Latin West: Studies in the Ruler Cult of the Western Provinces of the Roman Empire. Volume I.2, Leiden and New York.Google Scholar

Fishwick, D.(1998), ‘Our first high priest: a Gallic knight at Athens’, Epigraphica 60: 83–112.Google Scholar

Fishwick, D.(2002), The Imperial Cult in the Latin West: Studies in the Ruler Cult of the Western Provinces of the Roman Empire. Volume III: Provincial Cult. Part 2: The Provincial Priesthood, Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Fitz, J. (1978), ‘Die Laufbahn des Aelius Triccianus’, ActaArchHung 26: 21–7.Google Scholar

Fitz, J.(1983), Honorific Titles of Army Units in the Third Century, Budapest.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (1996), Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture, Oxford.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I.(2006), The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I.(2010), Roman Republics, Princeton.Google Scholar

Forbis, E. (1996), Municipal Virtues in the Roman Empire: The Evidence of Italian Honorary Inscriptions, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Forsythe, G. (2005), A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Fouracre, P. (2000), ‘The origins of the nobility in Francia’, in Duggan, A. J. (ed.), Nobles and Nobility in Medieval Europe: Concepts, Origins, Transformations, Woodbridge: 17–24.Google Scholar

Franklin, J. L. (2001), Pompeis difficile est: Studies in the Political Life of Imperial Pompeii, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Frederiksen, M. W. (1968), ‘Campanian cavalry: a question of origins’, Dialoghi di archeologia 2: 3–31.Google Scholar

Freyburger-Galland, M.-L. (1997), ‘Dion Cassius et le carrousel troyen’, Latomus 53: 619–29.Google Scholar

Friday, K. F. (2003), Samurai, Warfare and the State in Early Medieval Japan, London.Google Scholar

Frier, B. W. (1980), Landlords and Tenants in Imperial Rome, Princeton.Google Scholar

Frija, G. (2012), Les prêtres des empereurs: Le culte imperial civique dans la province romaine d’Asie, Rennes.Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, C. (2011), Policing the Roman Empire: Soldiers, Administration, and Public Order, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1976), Republican Rome, the Army and the Allies, trans. P. J. Cuff, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Gabba, E.(1992), ‘Rome and Italy: the Social War’, in CAH IX², 104–28.Google Scholar

Gabelmann, H. (1977), ‘Die ritterliche trabea’, JDAI 92: 322–74.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1969), Aeneas, Sicily, and Rome, Princeton.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K.(2011), ‘Continuity and change: religion in the Augustan semi-century’, in Rüpke, J. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Religion, Oxford and Malden, MA: 71–95.Google Scholar

Gardner, J. F. (1986), Women in Roman Law and Society, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garnsey, P. (1967), ‘Adultery trials and the survival of the quaestiones in the Severan age’, JRS 57: 56–60.Google Scholar

Garnsey, P.(1968), ‘The criminal jurisdiction of governors’, JRS 58: 51–9.Google Scholar

Garnsey, P.(1970), Social Status and Legal Privilege in the Roman Empire, Oxford.Google Scholar

Garnsey, P.(2004), ‘Roman citizenship and Roman law in the late Empire’, in Swain, S. and Edwards, M. (eds.), Approaching Late Antiquity: The Transformation from Early to Late Empire, Oxford: 133–55.Google Scholar

Garnsey, P.(2010), ‘Roman patronage’, in McGill, S., Sogno, C. and Watts, E. (eds.), From the Tetrarchs to the Theodosians: Later Roman History and Culture, 284–450 CE, Cambridge: 33–54.Google Scholar

Gasperini, L. (1959), ‘Nuove iscrizioni Etrusche e Latine di Visentium’, Epigraphica 21: 31–50.Google Scholar

Geagan, D. J. (1991), ‘The Sarapion monument and the quest for status in Roman Athens’, ZPE 85: 145–65.Google Scholar

Gerhardt, T. and Hartmann, U. (2008), ‘Fasti’, in Johne, K.-P., Hartmann, U. and Gerhardt, T. (eds.), Die Zeit der Soldatenkaiser: Krise und Transformation des römischen Reiches im 3. Jahrhundert n. Chr. (235–284), 2 vols., Berlin: 1055–1198.Google Scholar

Ghiretti, M. (1985), ‘Lo status della Giudea dall’età Augustea all’età Claudia’, Latomus 44: 751–66.Google Scholar

Gibson, B. (2006), Statius: Silvae 5, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2012), ‘Gallus: The first Roman love elegist’, in Gold, B. K. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Love Elegy, Oxford and Malden, MA: 172–86.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. and Morello, R. (2012), Reading the Letters of Pliny the Younger: An Introduction, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gilliam, J. F. (1961), ‘Egyptian “duces” under Gordian’, CdÉ 36: 386–92.Google Scholar

Giltaij, J. (2013), ‘The problem of the content of the lex Iulia iudiciorum publicorum’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 81: 507–25.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, M. (1940), ‘Roman military clubs and their social functions’, TAPA 71: 149–56.Google Scholar

Giovannini, A. (2010), ‘Cheval public et ordre équestre à la fin de la République’, Athenaeum 98: 354–64.Google Scholar

Glas, T. and Hartmann, U. (2008), ‘Die Provinzverwaltung’, in Johne, K.-P., Hartmann, U. and Gerhardt, T. (eds.), Die Zeit der Soldatenkaiser: Krise und Transformation des römischen Reiches im 3. Jahrhundert n. Chr. (235–284), 2 vols., Berlin: 641–72.Google Scholar

Gnecchi, F. (1912), I Medaglioni Romani, 3 vols., Milan.Google Scholar

Gold, B. K. (1982), ‘Propertius 3.9: Maecenas as Eques, Dux, Fautor’, in Gold, B. K. (ed.), Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome, Austin: 103–17.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (2007), ‘Performing theory: variations on a theme by Quintilian’, in Beghin, T. and Goldberg, S. (eds.), Haydn and the Performance of Rhetoric, Chicago: 39–60.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, R. W. (1984), ‘An estimate of the size and structure of the national product of the early Roman empire’, Review of Income and Wealth 30: 263–88.Google Scholar

Goltz, A. and Hartmann, U. (2008), ‘Valerianus und Gallienus’, in Johne, K.-P., Hartmann, U. and Gerhardt, T. (eds.), Die Zeit der Soldatenkaiser: Krise und Transformation des römischen Reiches im 3. Jahrhundert n. Chr. (235–284), 2 vols., Berlin: 223–96.Google Scholar

González, J. (1986), ‘The Lex Irnitana: a new copy of the Flavian municipal law’, JRS 76: 147–243.Google Scholar

Gordon, A. E. (1938), The Cults of Lanuvium, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Gordon, A. E.(1952), Quintus Veranius, Consul AD 49: A Study Based upon his Recently Identified Sepulchral Inscription, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Goette, H. R. (1988), ‘Mulleus – Embas – Calceus: Ikonografische Studien zu römischen Schuhwerk’, JDAI 103: 401–64.Google Scholar

Graff, D. A. (2002), Medieval Chinese Warfare, 300–900, London.Google Scholar

Grandvallet, C. (2006), ‘Marinianus, successeur désigné de Gallien?’, AC 75: 133–41.Google Scholar

Granger-Taylor, H. (1982), ‘Weaving clothes to shape in the ancient world: the tunic and toga of the Arringatore’, Textile History 13: 3–25.Google Scholar

Granino Cecere, M. G. (1996), ‘Sacerdotes Cabenses e sacerdotes Albani: la documentazione epigrafica’, in Pasqualini, A. (ed.), Alba Longa: mito, storia, archeologia: atti dell’incontro di studio Roma–Albano Laziale, 27–29 gennaio 1994, Rome: 275–316.Google Scholar

Grieve, L. J. (1987), ‘Proci patricii: a question of voting order in the centuriate assembly’, Historia 36: 302–17.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (1973), ‘The leges iudiciariae of the pre-Sullan era’, CQ 23: 108–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, M. T.(1984), Nero: The End of a Dynasty, London.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T.(2013), Seneca on Society: A Guide to De Beneficiis, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. (1968), Roman Politics and the Criminal Courts, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Gruen, E.(1974), The Last Generation of the Roman Republic, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Gruen, E.(1984), The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Haack, M.-L. (2006), Prosopographie des haruspices romains, Pisa and Rome.Google Scholar

Habicht, C. (1969), Altertümer von Pergamon VIII.3: Die Inschriften des Asklepieions, Berlin.Google Scholar

Haensch, R. (1998), ‘Statthalterinschriften’, ZPE 122: 286–92.Google Scholar

Haensch, R.(2001), ‘Veteranus ex beneficiario consularis, equestris militiae petitor: mögliche Gründe für einen außergewöhnlichen Aufstieg’, Kölner Jahrbuch 34: 135–9.Google Scholar

Haensch, R.(2006), ‘Von den Augusti liberti zu den Caesariani’, in Kolb, A. (ed.), Herrschaftsstrukturen und Herrschaftspraxis: Konzepte, Prinzipien und Strategien der Administration im römischen Kaiserreich, Berlin: 153–64.Google Scholar

Haensch, R. and Weiß, P. (2012), ‘Ein schwieriger Weg: Die Straßenbauinschrift des M. Valerius Lollianus aus Byllis’, MDAI (RA) 118: 435–54.Google Scholar

Hagedorn, D. (1985), ‘Zum Amt des διοικητής im römischen Aegypten’, YClS 28: 167–210.Google Scholar

Haldon, J. F. (1990), Byzantium in the Seventh Century: The Transformation of a Culture, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Haldon, J. F.(2004), ‘The fate of the Late Roman senatorial elite: extinction or transformation’, in Haldon, J. F. and Conrad, L. I. (eds.), Elites Old and New in the Byzantine and Early Islamic Near East, Princeton: 179–234.Google Scholar

Haldon, J. F.(2009), ‘Social élites, wealth and power’, in Haldon, J. F. (ed.), A Social History of Byzantium, Oxford and Malden, MA: 168–211.Google Scholar

Halsall, G. (2007), Barbarian Migrations and the Roman West, 376–568, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Halsall, G.(2010), Cemeteries and Society in Merovingian Gaul: Selected Studies in History and Archaeology, 1992–2009, Leiden.Google Scholar

Halfmann, H. (1982), ‘Zwei syrische Verwandte des severischen Kaiserhauses’, Chiron 12: 217–35.Google Scholar

Hammer, D. (2014), Roman Political Thought: From Cicero to Augustine, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hanchey, D. (2013), ‘Otium as civic and personal stability in Cicero’s Dialogues’, CW 106: 171–97.Google Scholar

Handy, M. (2006), ‘Bemerkungen zum edictum Gallieni’, in Frass, M. et al. (eds.), Akten des 10 Österreichen Althistorkertages, Vienna: 73–81.Google Scholar

Handy, M.(2009), Die Severer und das Heer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Hanson, A. E. (1982), ‘Publius Ostorius Scapula: Augustan prefect of Egypt’, ZPE 47: 243–53.Google Scholar

Harmand, J. (1967), L’armée et le soldat a Rome de 107 à 50 avant notre ère, Paris.Google Scholar

Harper, K. (2011), Slavery in the Late Roman World, AD 275–425, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. (1979), War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, 327–70 BC, Oxford.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V.(2011), Rome’s Imperial Economy: Twelve Essays, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hartmann, A. (2017), ‘Between Greece and Rome: forging a primordial identity for the imperial aristocracy’, in Vanacker, W. and Zuiderhoek, A. (eds.), Imperial Identities in the Roman World, London: 16–35.Google Scholar