Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:31:29.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Fraction of life-bearing planets on which intelligent life emerges, fi, pre-1961

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

Douglas A. Vakoch
Affiliation:
SETI Institute, California
Matthew F. Dowd
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Frank Drake
Affiliation:
SETI Institute, California
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Among ancient authors, only the Epicureans believed in the existence of extraterrestrial intelligent beings (ETI). Astronomy was shaken at its roots after 1543, when Nicholas Copernicus presented his heliocentric system. By the end of the sixteenth century, Giordano Bruno speculated that stars are inhabited suns surrounded by inhabited planets. By 1750, growing acceptance of (1) the principle of plenitude (the idea that God or nature would populate most regions of the universe) and (2) versions of the so-called Copernican principle (the claim that all regions of space must be more or less identical to the region in our solar system) led to widespread belief in a large value for fi. An influential advocate for a high value of fi was Christiaan Huygens, who in his Cosmotheoros (1698) relied heavily on the latter principle. Belief in ETI was widespread in the eighteenth century, including such pioneers of stellar astronomy as Johann Lambert, Immanuel Kant, and William Herschel. Belief in ETI remained widespread from 1750 to 1870, despite counterevidence from such scientific laws as the inverse-square laws for gravitation, light, and radiant heat.

The first modern author who seriously challenged claims for a high value for fi was William Whewell, who in 1853 questioned whether higher forms of life could survive elsewhere in our solar system, doing this partly in terms of the inverse-square laws. Whewell's Of the Plurality of Worlds: An Essay outraged many of his contemporaries but gradually found limited acceptance among such astronomers as Richard Proctor, who recognized the need for a much lower value for fi. Roughly simultaneously, the Darwin-Wallace theory of evolution by natural selection led scientists to a deeper and more naturalistic understanding of the development of higher forms of life. Moreover, Wallace in 1904 stressed the improbability of beings as complex as humans developing elsewhere.

During the first half of the twentieth century, belief in ETI was at a relatively low level, partly because various scientific factors, such as encounter theories of planet formation, were taken seriously. Around 1950, belief in ETI became more widespread after the Miller-Urey experiment (1953) and the development of radio telescopes raised hopes that ETI might be contacted.1

Type
Chapter
Information
The Drake Equation
Estimating the Prevalence of Extraterrestrial Life through the Ages
, pp. 163 - 180
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartusiak, Marcia. 2010. The Day We Found the Universe. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. G. W. (ed.) 1963. Interstellar Communication: A Collection of Reprints and Original Contributions. New York: W. A. Benjamin.Google Scholar
“Circumstellar Habitable Zone.” 2014. Available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumstellar_habitable_zone/.Google Scholar
Crowe, Michael J. 1986. The Extraterrestrial Life Debate 1750–1900: The Idea of a Plurality of Worlds from Kant to Lowell. Cambridge University Press. Repr. as The Extraterrestrial Life Debate 17501900. Mineola: Dover, 1999.Google Scholar
Crowe, Michael J. (ed.) 2008. The Extraterrestrial Life Debate, Antiquity to 1900: A Source Book. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Crowe, Michael J. 2011. “The Surprising History of Claims for Life on the Sun.” Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage 14(3): 169–79.Google Scholar
Crowe, Michael J., and Dowd, Matthew F.. 2013. “The Extraterrestrial Life Debate from Antiquity to 1900.” In Astrobiology, History, and Society: Life Beyond Earth and the Impact of Discovery, ed. Vakoch, Douglas A., 356. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling, David. 2014. “Drake Equation.” Available at www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/D/DrakeEq.html.Google Scholar
DeVorkin, David. 1984. “Stellar Evolution and the Origin of the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram.” In Astrophysics and Twentieth-century Astronomy to 1950, ed. Gingerich, Owen, 90108. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dick, Steven J. 1982. Plurality of Worlds: The Origins of the Extraterrestrial Life Debate from Democritus to Kant. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dick, Steven J. 1996. The Biological Universe: The Twentieth-Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate and the Limits of Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dick, Steven J. 1998. Life on Other Worlds: The Twentieth-Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthke, Karl S. 1990. The Last Frontier: Imagining Other Worlds from the Copernican Revolution to Modern Science Fiction. Translated by Atkins, Helen. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Herschel, John. 1833. Treatise on Astronomy. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Jaki, Stanley. 1978. Planets and Planetarians. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kragh, Helge. 1996. Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mach, Ernst. n.d. The Principles of Physical Optics: An Historical and Philosophical Treatment. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Matthew, William Diller. 1921. “Life in Other Worlds.” Science 54: 239–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearman, J. P. T. 1963. “Extraterrestrial Intelligent Life and Interstellar Communication: An Informal Discussion.” In Cameron 1963: 287–93.Google Scholar
Tipler, Frank. 1981. “A Brief History of the Extraterrestrial Intelligence Concept.” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 22: 133–45.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. 1859. Of the Plurality of Worlds: An Essay, 5th ed. London: John W. Parker and Son.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. 2001. A Dialogue on the Plurality of Worlds. In Of the Plurality of Worlds, facsimile edition, ed. Ruse, Michael. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×