Abrams, M. H. (1953) The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. New York.Google Scholar

Abry, J.-H. (1993) “Le Nil: Réflexions sur les vers iii.271–274 des Astronomiques,” in Manilio fra poesia e scienza: Atti del convegno, Lecce, 14–16 maggio 1992, ed. Liuzzi, D.. Galatina. 195–210.Google Scholar

Abry, J.-H.(1999) “Présence de Lucrèce: Les Astronomiques de Manilius,” in Présence de Lucrèce: Actes du colloque tenu à Tours (3–5 décembre 1998), ed. Poignault, R.. Tours. 3–28.Google Scholar

Acosta-Hughes, B. (2002) Polyeideia: The Iambi of Callimachus and the Archaic Iambic Tradition. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Adam, J. (ed.) (1963) The Republic of Plato. 2 vols. 2nd edn. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. (1974) Drei Studien zu Hegel. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. (1984) “The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 105, no. 2: 174–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Algra, K. (1995) Concepts of Space in Greek Thought. Leiden.Google Scholar

Algra, K. (1999) “The Beginnings of Cosmology,” in The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A.. Cambridge. 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Algra, K. (2000) “The Treatise of Cleomedes and its Critique of Epicurean Cosmology,” in Epikureismus in der späten Republik und der Kaiserzeit: Akten der 2. Tagung der Karl-und-Gertrud-Abel-Stiftung vom 30. September–3. Oktober 1998 in Würzburg, ed. Erler, M. and Bees, R.. Stuttgart. 164–89.Google Scholar

Alison, A. (1790) Essays on the Nature and Principles of Taste. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Allen, W. Jr. (1941) “The Terentianus of Περὶ ὕψους,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 62, no. 1: 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Althusser, L. (1971) Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays. Trans. Brewster, B. R.. London.Google Scholar

Altschul, A. (1889) De Demetrii rhetoris aetate. Jena.Google Scholar

Ansell-Pearson, K., and Large, D. (eds.) (2006) The Nietzsche Reader. Malden, MA and Oxford.Google Scholar

Aristotle, (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. Barnes, J.. Princeton.Google Scholar

Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1989) Sapientiae facies: Étude sur les images de Sénèque. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1990) “Pline le Jeune et le sublime,” Révue des Études Latines vol. 68: 88–98.Google Scholar

Ashfield, A., and de Bolla, P. (eds.) (1996) The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asper, M. (1997) Onomata Allotria: Zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Auerbach, E. ([1946] 1953) “Odysseus’ Scar,” in Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, Trans. Trask, W. R.. Princeton. 3–23.Google Scholar

Auerbach, E. (1958) Literatursprache und Publikum in der lateinischen Spätantike und im Mittelalter. Bern.Google Scholar

Auerbach, E. (1965) Literary Language and its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. Trans. Manheim, R.. New York (German original edition: 1958).Google Scholar

Auerbach, E. (1967 [1950]) “Ernst Robert Curtius: Europäische Literatur und Lateinisches Mittelalter (1948),” in Auerbach, , Gesammelte Aufsätze zur romanischen Philologie. Bern and Munich. 330–8.Google Scholar

Auerbach, E. (1993) Literary Language and Its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. Trans. Manheim, Ralph with a new Foreword by Ziolkowski, Jan. Princeton (German original edition: 1958).Google Scholar

Auerbach, E. (2003) Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Trans. Trask, W. R.. Princeton. (First published 1953.)Google Scholar

Augello, I. (ed.) (2006) Cecilio di Calatte: Frammenti di critica letteraria, retorica e storiografia. Rome.Google Scholar

Aullón de Haro, P. (2006) La sublimidad y lo sublime. Madrid.Google Scholar

Bachmann, W. G. (1902–4) Die ästhetischen Anschauungen Aristarchs in der Exegese und Kritik der homerischen Gedichte. 2 vols. Nuremberg.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (trans.) (1910) Lucretius, , On the Nature of Things. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (ed.) (1947) Titi Lucreti Cari, De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Baillie, J. (1747) An Essay on the Sublime. London.Google Scholar

Baker, E. (2007) “Lucretius in the European Enlightenment,” in The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, ed. Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P.. Cambridge. 274–88.Google Scholar

Bakola, E. (2010) Cratinus and the Art of Comedy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bakola, E. (2014) “Interiority, the ‘Deep Earth’ and the Spatial Symbolism of Darius’ Apparition in the Persians of Aechylus,” The Cambridge Classical Journal vol. 60: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakola, E., Prauscello, L., and Telò, M. (2013) Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balzac, J.-L. G. de (1665) Les oeuvres de monsieur de Balzac divisées en deux tomes. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar

Barber, C., and Papaioannou, S. (eds.) (forthcoming) Michael Psellos on Literature and Art. Notre Dame.Google Scholar

Barker, A. (1987) “Text and Sense at Philebus 56a,” The Classical Quarterly n.s. vol. 37, no. 1: 103–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barlow, S. A. (trans.) (1996) Euripides, Heracles. Warminster.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1977) “De mundo.” Review of G. Reale, Aristotele: Trattato sul cosmo per Alessandro. Traduzione con testo greco a fronte, introduzione, commento e indici. (Naples, 1974). Classical Review 27, no. 1: 40–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, J. (1982) The Presocratic Philosophers, Rev. edn. London.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1989) “The Size of the Sun in Antiquity,” Acta Classica Universitatis Scientiarum Debreceniensis vol. 15: 29–41.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1977) “Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives,” in Barthes, , Image, Music, Text. ed. Heath, S.. Trans. Heath, S.. New York. 79–124.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1982) Empire of Signs. Trans. Howard, R.. New York.Google Scholar

Barwick, K. (1967) “Die “Rhetorik ad Alexandrum” und Anaximenes, Alkidamas, Isokrates, Aristoteles und die Theodekteia (Fortsetzung),” Philologus vol. 3, no. 1/2: 47–55.Google Scholar

Baxandall, M. (1971) Giotto and the Orators: Humanist Observers of Painting in Italy and the Discovery of Pictorial Composition, 1350–1450. Oxford.Google Scholar

Baxandall, M. (1988) Painting and Experience in Fifteenth-Century Italy: A Primer in the Social History of Pictorial Style. 2nd edn. Oxford. (1st edn. 1972.)Google Scholar

Beekes, R., and van Beek, L. (2010) Etymological Dictionary of Greek. 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar

Bernadette, S. (trans.) (1991) “Aeschylus, The Suppliant Maidens,” in Aeschylus ii: The Suppliant Maidens, The Persians, Seven Against Thebes, Prometheus Bound, ed. Grene, D. and Lattimore, R.. 2nd edn. Chicago.Google Scholar

Biles, Z. P. (2002) “Intertextual Biography in the Rivalry of Cratinus and Aristophanes,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 123, no. 2: 169–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Billings, J. (2014) Genealogy of the Tragic: Greek Tragedy and German Philosophy. Princeton.Google Scholar

Binski, P. (2010) “Reflection on ‘The Wonderful Height and Size’ of Gothic Great Churches and the Medieval Sublime,” in Magnificence and the Sublime in Medieval Aesthetics: Art, Architecture, Literature, Music, ed. Jaeger, C. S.. New York. 130–56.Google Scholar

Blank, D. (1995) “Philodemus and the Technicity of Rhetoric,” in Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace, ed. Obbink, D.. New York. 178–88.Google Scholar

Blass, F. (1865) Die griechische Beredsamkeit in dem Zeitraum von Alexander bis auf Augustus. Ein litterarhistorischer Versuch. Berlin.Google Scholar

Blass, F. (1887–98) Die attische Beredsamkeit, 2nd edn. 3 vols. in 4. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (2011) The Anatomy of Influence: Literature as a Way of Life. New Haven.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, H. (1979) Schiffbruch mit Zuschauer: Paradigma einer Daseinsmetapher. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, H. (1988) Die Legitimität der Neuzeit, 2nd, rev. edn. Frankfurt am Main. (1st edn. 1966)Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (1984) Descent from Heaven: Images of Dew in Greek Poetry and Religion. Chico, CA.Google Scholar

Boehm, I., and Hübner, W. (eds.) (2011) La poésie astrologique dans l'Antiquité: Actes du colloque organisé les 7 et 8 décembre 2007 par J.-H. Abry (Université Lyon 3) avec la collaboration de I. Boehm (Université Lyon 2). Paris.Google Scholar

Bohrer, K. H. (1981) Plötzlichkeit: Zum Augenblick des ӓsthetischen Scheins. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Bohrer, K. H. (2003) Ekstasen der Zeit: Augenblick, Gegenwart, Erinnerung. Munich.Google Scholar

Boileau Despréaux, N. (1674) Œuvres diverses du Sieur D***. Avec le Traité du sublime, ou, Du merveilleux dans le discours. Traduit du Grec de Longin. Paris.Google Scholar

Boileau Despréaux, N. (1718) Oeuvres de Nicolas Boileau Despréaux, avec des éclaircissemens historiques donnez par lui-même (et le commentaire de Brossette). Nouvelle édition … augmentée de diverses remarques (de Dumonteil). 2 vols. in 4. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Boileau Despréaux, N. (1772 [1669]) “Dissertation sur La Joconde de M. de la Fontaine, à M. B… . .” in Œuvres de Boileau Despréaux, ed. Brossette, C. and de Saint-Marc, L.. Amsterdam. Vol. iii: 372–98.Google Scholar

Boitani, P. (1989) The Tragic and the Sublime in Medieval Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bonaventure, (1882–1902) Opera omnia. 11 vols. in 10. Quarracchi.Google Scholar

Bond, G. W. (ed.) (1988) Euripides, Heracles. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bos, A. P. (1993) “Clement of Alexandria on Aristotle's (Cosmo-)Theology (Clem. Protrept. 5.66.4),” The Classical Quarterly n.s. vol. 43, no. 1: 177–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouhours, D. (1671) Les entretiens d'Ariste et d'Eugene. Paris.Google Scholar

Bowen, A. C., and Todd, R. B. (2004) Cleomedes’ Lectures on Astronomy: A Translation of The Heavens. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Bowra, C. M. (1940) “Sophocles on his Own Development,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 61, no. 3: 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, M. J. (1957) “Longinus, the ‘Philological Discourses,’ and the Essay ‘On the Sublime,’” The Classical Quarterly n.s. vol. 7, no. 1/2: 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1972) “Ennius and the Hellenistic Worship of Homer,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 93, no. 4: 547–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broadie, S. (1999) “Rational Theology,” in The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A.. Cambridge. 205–24.Google Scholar

Brody, J. (1958) Boileau and Longinus. Geneva.Google Scholar

Brody, J. (1966) “Platonisme et classicisme,” in French Classicism: A Critical Miscellany, ed. Brody, J.. Englewood Cliffs. 186–207.Google Scholar

Brzoska, J. (1883) “De canone decem oratorum Atticorum quaestiones.” Diss., Breslau.Google Scholar

Brzoska, J. (1899) “Caecilius (2),” in Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Supplement, ed. von Pauly, A. F., Wissowa, G., Kroll, W., et al. 16 vols. Stuttgart, vol. iii.5: 1174–88.Google Scholar

Buchheim, T. (1985) “Maler, Sprachbildner: Zur Verwandtschaft des Gorgias mit Empedokles,” Hermes vol. 113, no. 4: 417–29.Google Scholar

Buffière, F. (1956) Les mythes d'Homère et la pensée grecque. Paris.Google Scholar

Bühler, W. (1959) “Maniliana,” Hermes vol. 87, no. 4: 475–94.Google Scholar

Bühler, W. (1964) Beiträge zur Erklärung der Schrift vom Erhabenen. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Burke, E. (1968 [1757; 1759]) A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, ed. Boulton, J. T.. Notre Dame.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (2008a) Aristotle's Divine Intellect. Milwaukee.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (2008b) “Eikōs Muthos,” in Plato's Myths, ed. Partenie, C.. Cambridge. 166–86.Google Scholar

Bussels, S., (P. I.) (2012) “Elevated Minds: The Sublime in the Public Arts in 17th-century Paris and Amsterdam.” (Research proposal.)Google Scholar

Butler, S. (2015) The Ancient Phonograph. New York and Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, S., and Purves, A. (eds.) (2013) Synesthesia and the Ancient Senses. London.Google Scholar

Bynum, C. W. (2011) Christian Materiality: An Essay on Religion in Late Medieval Europe. New York and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Calcante, C. M. (2000) Genera dicendi e retorica del sublime. Pisa.Google Scholar

Calcante, C. M. (2004) “Il De elocutione di Demetrio e il De Demosthene di Dionigi di Alicarnasso,” Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo. Classe di Lettere e Scienze Morali e Storiche vol. 138: 99–124.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (1991) “How Thin Was Philitas?,” The Classical Quarterly n.s. vol. 41, no. 2: 534–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, A. (1995) Callimachus and His Critics. Princeton.Google Scholar

Capelle, W. (1905) “Die Schrift von der Welt: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der griechischen Popularphilosophie. Festschrift der klassisch-philologischen Gesellschaft zu Hamburg der 48. Versammlung deutscher Philologen und Schulmänner zu Hamburg 1905 gewidmet,” Neue Jahrbücher für das klassisches Altertum vol. 15.1, no. 8: 529–68.Google Scholar

Capelle, W. (1912) “Μετέωρος – μετεωρολογία,” Philologus vol. 71: 414–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capelle, W. (1916) Berges-und Wolkenhöhen bei griechischen Physikern. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar

Capizzi, A. (1983) “Mente elevata e mente profonda: Hypsos e bathos dal concreto alla metafora,” in Il Sublime: Contributi per la storia di un'idea, ed. Casertano, G. and Martano, G.. Naples. 55–75.Google Scholar

Carey, C. (trans.) (2000) Aeschines. Austin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casaubon, M. (1655) A treatise concerning enthusiasme, as it is an effect of nature: but is mistaken by many for either divine inspiration, or diabolical possession. London.Google Scholar

Casertano, G. (1983) “Pathos e techne nell'Anonimo Del Sublime,” in Il Sublime: Contributi per la storia di un'idea, ed. Casertano, G. and Martano, G.. Naples. 103–29.Google Scholar

Caussin, N. (1630) De eloquentia sacra et humana libri xvi, 3rd edn. Paris. (1st edn. 1617/18.)Google Scholar

Celan, P. (1983) Gesammelte Werke, ed. Allemann, B., Reichert, S. and Bücher, R.. 5 vols. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Chadwick, H. (trans.) (1992) Augustine, Confessions. Oxford.Google Scholar

Chantraine, P. (2009) Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: Histoire des mots, ed. Taillardat, J., Blanc, A., Masson, O., et al. Paris.Google Scholar

Cheney, P. (2009) Marlowe's Republican Authorship: Lucan, Liberty, and the Sublime. New York.Google Scholar

Chiron, P. (ed.) (1993) Demetrius, Du style. Paris.Google Scholar

Chiron, P. (2001) Un rhéteur méconnu: Démétrios (Ps.-Démétrios de Phalére). Essai sur les mutations de la théorie du style à l’époque hellénistique. Paris.Google Scholar

Cizek, E. (1972) L’Époque de Néron et ses controverses idéologiques. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clay, D. (1992) “The World of Hesiod,” Ramus vol. 21, no. 2: 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clay, D. (1997) “Lucretius’ Gigantomachy,” in Lucretius and his Intellectual Background, ed. Algra, K., Koenen, M. H. and Schrijvers, P. H.. Amsterdam. 187–92.Google Scholar

Coleridge, S. T. (1990) Table Talk. Recorded by Henry Nelson Coleridge (and John Taylor Coleridge), ed. Woodring, C.. 2 vols. (= The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, vol. xiv). London and Princeton.Google Scholar

Coleridge, S. T. (1995) Shorter Works and Fragments, ed. Jackson, H. J. and Jackson, J. R. de J.. 2 vols. (= The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, vol. xi) Princeton.Google Scholar

Coleridge, S. T. (2003) On the Sublime, ed. Vaillins, D.. (= Coleridge's Writings, vol. v, ed. Beer, J.). Basingstoke.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. (1925) Outlines of a Philosophy of Art. London.Google Scholar

Conley, T. M. (1990) Rhetoric in the European Tradition. New York.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1965) “Il trionfo della morte e la galleria dei grandi trapassati in Lucrezio iii, 1024–1053,” Studi italiani di filologia classica vol. 37: 114–32.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1966) “Hypsos e diatriba nello stile di Lucrezio: De Rer. Nat. ii 1–61,” Maia vol. 18: 338–68.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1991a) Generi e lettori: Lucrezio, l'elegia d'amore, l'enciclopedia di Plinio. Milan.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1991b) “Insegnamenti per un lettore sublime: Forma del testo e forma del desintatoriao nel De rerum natura di Lucrezio,” in Conte, , Generi e lettori: Lucrezio, l'elegia d'amore, l'enciclopedia di Plinio. Milan. 9–52.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (2007) “Anatomy of a Style: Enallage and the New Sublime,” in The Poetry of Pathos: Studies in Virgilian Epic, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford. 58–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cope, E. M. (1877) The Rhetoric of Aristotle, with a Commentary, ed. and rev. Sandys, J. E.. 3 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Costa, G. (1985) “The Latin Translations of Longinus’s περὶ ὕψους in Renaissance Italy,” in Acta Conventus Neo-Latini Bononiensis: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Neo-Latin Studies Bologna, 26 August to 1 September 1979, ed. Schoeck, R. J.. Binghamton, NY. 224–38.Google Scholar

Costelloe, T. M. (2012) “The Sublime: A Short Introduction to a Long History,” in The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present, ed. Costelloe, T. M.. Cambridge. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costil, P. (1944) “La composition et la doctrine du Περὶ λέξεως de Théophraste,” in Mélanges J. Saunier, ed. Gardette, P., Gallay, P. and Molager, J.. Lyon. 53–79.Google Scholar

Costil, P. (1949) “L'Esthétique littéraire de Denys d'Halicarnasse: Étude sur le classement et la doctrine des Opera rhetorica.” Diss., Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Costil, P. (1951) “L'Esthétique stoïcienne,” in Actes du Premier Congrès de la Fedération Internationale des Associations d’Études Classiques, Paris. 360–4.Google Scholar

Coulter, J. A. (1976) The Literary Microcosm: Theories of Interpretation of the Later Neoplatonists. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courcelle, P. (1967) La Consolation de philosophie dans la tradition littéraire: Antécédents et postérité de Boèce. Paris.Google Scholar

Crane, R. S. (1936) “Review of S. Monk, The Sublime,” Philological Quarterly vol. 15, no. 2: 165–7.Google Scholar

Crisp, R. (2006) “Aristotle on Greatness of Soul,” in The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Kraut, R.. Malden, MA and Oxford. 158–78.Google Scholar

Crockett, C. (2001) A Theology of the Sublime. London.Google Scholar

Crönert, W. (1906) Kolotes und Menedemos: Texte und Untersuchungen zur Philosophen‐ und Literaturgeschichte. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Cronk, N. (2002) The Classical Sublime: French Neoclassicism and the Language of Literature. Charlottesville.Google Scholar

Cunliffe, R. J. (1924) A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect. London, Glasgow, and Bombay. (Repr. 1963, Norman, OK.)Google Scholar

Currie, B. (2005) Pindar and the Cult of Heroes. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curtius, E. R. (1953) European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Trans. Trask, W. R.. New York. (German original, 1948.)Google Scholar

Curzer, H. J. (2012) Aristotle and the Virtues. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cutler, A. (2000) “In the Margins of Byzantium? Some Icons in Michael Psellos,” in Byzantium, Italy and the North: Papers on Cultural Relations, ed. Cutler, A. and Browning, M.. London. (First published in Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 16 (1992)).Google Scholar

Daiber, H. (1992) “The Meteorology in Syriac and Arabic Translation,” in Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical, and Scientific Writings, ed. Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Gutas, D.. New Brunswick. 166–293.Google Scholar

Damon, C. (1991) “Aesthetic Response and Technical Analysis in the Rhetorical Writings of Dionysius of Halicarnassus,” Museum Helveticum vol. 48: 33–58.Google Scholar

Day, H. J. M. (2013) Lucan and the Sublime: Power, Representation and Aesthetic Experience. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Jonge, C. C. (2005) “Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the Method of Metathesis,” Classical Quarterly vol. 55, no. 2: 463–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Jonge, C. C. (2008) Between Grammar and Rhetoric: Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics and Literature. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Jonge, C. C. (2009) Review of Marini, N., ed. Demetrio, Lo Stile (Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 2007). Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 12 August.Google Scholar

de Jonge, C. C. (2011) “Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the Scholia on Thucydides’ Syntax,” in Ancient Scholarship and Grammar Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts, ed. Matthaios, S., Montanari, F. and Rengakos, A.. Berlin. 451–78.Google Scholar

de Jonge, C. C. (2012) “Dionysius and Longinus on the Sublime: Rhetoric and Religious Language,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 153, no. 2: 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Jonge, C. C. (2013) “Longinus 36.3: The Faulty Colossus and Plato's Phaedrus,” Trends in Classics vol. 5, no. 2: 318–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Jonge, C. C. (2014) “The Attic Muse and the Asian Harlot: Classicizing Allegories in Dionysius and Longinus,” in Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World. Proceedings from the Penn-Leiden Colloquia on Ancient Values, vol. vii. ed. Ker, J. and Pieper, C.. Leiden. 388–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Lacy, P. (1943) “The Philosophy of the Aetna,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association vol. 74: 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Saint-Denis, E. (ed.) (1966) Virgil, Géorgiques. Paris. (1st edn. 1956.)Google Scholar

de Vivo, A. (1989) “Considerazioni sull’Aetna: Rapporti con Seneca, epoca della composizione,” Vichiana vol. 17: 63–85.Google Scholar

de Vries, G. J. (1969) A Commentary on the Phaedrus of Plato. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

DeJean, J. (1987) “Fictions of Sappho,” Critical Inquiry vol. 13, no. 4: 787–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delarue, F. (2000) Stace, poète épique: Originalité et cohérence. Louvain.Google Scholar

Delarue, F. (2004) “Le sublime et Pline, Ep. ix,26,” in Epistulae antiquae iii: Actes du iii^e Colloque international ‘L’épistolaire antique et ses prolongements européens’ (Université François-Rabelais, Tours, 25–27 Septembre 2002), ed. Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, É.. Louvain and Dudley, MA. 449–61.Google Scholar

Delarue, F. (2006) “Sénèque lecteur d'Ovide et le Traité du Sublime.” In Interférences, Ars Scribendi, 4. http://ars-scribendi.ens-lsh.frGoogle Scholar

Delatte, A. (1934) Les conceptions de l'enthousiasme chez les philosophes présocratiques. Paris.Google Scholar

Dennis, J. (1701) The Advancement and Reformation of Modern Poetry: A Critical Discourse in Two Parts [etc.]. London.Google Scholar

Dennis, J. (1704) The Grounds of Criticism in Poetry [etc.]. London.Google Scholar

Denniston, J. D. (1952) Greek Prose Style. Oxford.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1884) “Gorgias und Empedokles,” Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften vol. 49: 343–68.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1969) “Lukrezstudien ii–iii,” in Diels, Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, ed. Burkert, W.. Darmstadt. 340–56. [Originally published in Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Berlin, 1920, pp. 2–18.].Google Scholar

Dobbin, R. (trans.) (2008) Epictetus, , Discourses and Selected Writings. London and New York.Google Scholar

Dobson, J. F. (1918) “The Posidonius Myth,” The Classical Quarterly vol. 12, no. 4: 179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donadi, F. (ed.) (1982) Gorgias, , Encomio di Elena. Rome.Google Scholar

Donovan, J. (1892) “The Festal Origin of Human Speech,” Mind n.s. vol. 1, no. 3: 325–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doran, R. (2015) The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorandi, T. (ed.) (1991) Filodemo, Storia dei filosofi: Platone e l'Academia (P. Herc. 1021 e 164). Naples.Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E. (1956) “Cicero, Quintilian, and the Canon of Ten Attic Orators,” Mnemosyne vol. 49, no. 1: 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dover, K. J. (ed.) (1993) Aristophanes, , Frogs. Oxford.Google Scholar

Drachmann, A. B. (ed.) (1903) Scholia vetera in Pindari carmina. 3 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Drerup, E. (1923) Demosthenes im Urteile des Altertums: Von Theopomp bis Tzetzes. Geschichte, Roman, Legende. Würzburg.Google Scholar

Dugan, J. (2005) Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Düring, I. (ed.) (1961) Aristotle's Protrepticus: An Attempt at Reconstruction. Göteborg.Google Scholar

Dušanić, S. (1999) “Isocrates, the Chian Intellectuals, and the Political Context of the Euthydemus,” Journal of Hellenic Studies vol. 119: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagleton, T. (1990) The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Eck, Caroline van (2005) “‘A Most Solemn and Awfull Appearance’: Seventeenth-Century Translations of Longinus and the Church Architecture of Hawksmoor,” in Histories of the Sublime: 9–10 December 2005, ed. Madelein, C., Pieters, J. and Vandenabeele, B.. Brussels. 23–32.Google Scholar

Eck, Caroline van, Bussels, S., Delbeke, M., and Pieters, J. (eds.) (2012) Translations of the Sublime: The Early Modern Reception and Dissemination of Longinus’ Peri Hupsous in Rhetoric, the Visual Arts, Architecture and the Theatre. Leiden.Google Scholar

Edelstein, L., and Kidd, I. G. (eds.) (1972–1999) Posidonius. 3 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Effe, B. (1977) Dichtung und Lehre: Untersuchungen zur Typologie des antiken Lehrgedichts. Zetemata vol. 69. Munich.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (1899) “The Literary Relations of ‘Longinus’ and Manilius,” Classical Review vol. 13, no. 6: 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R. (ed.) (1901) Aetna: A Critical Recension of the Text. Oxford.Google Scholar

Else, G. F. (1967) Aristotle's Poetics: The Argument. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Ernesti, J. C. G. (1795) Lexicon technologiae graecorum rhetoricae. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Eyjólfur Kjalar, E. (2007) Plotinus on Intellect. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (trans.) (2010) Seneca, Selected Letters. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fantham, E., (2011) “More Sentiment than Science: Roman Stargazing before and after Manilius,” in Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, ed. Green, S. J. and Volk, K.. Oxford. 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, E., (2013) Roman Literary Culture: From Plautus to Macrobius, 2nd edn. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York.Google Scholar

Fenves, P. (2003) Late Kant: Towards Another Law of the Earth. New York.Google Scholar

Ferrari, G. R. F. (1987) Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato's Phaedrus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrario, M. (1972) “Ricerche intorno al Trattato del sublime,” Rendiconti dell'Istituto Lombardo, Classe di lettere, scienze morali e storiche vol. 106: 765–843.Google Scholar

Ferri, R. (1993) I dispiaceri di un epicureo: uno studio sulla poetica oraziana delle Epistole (con un capitolo su Persio). Pisa.Google Scholar

Festugière, A. J. (1950) La révélation d'Hermès Trismégiste, 2nd edn. 3 vols. Paris.Google Scholar

Flacius Illyricus, M. (1629) Clavis Scripturae, seu De sermone sacrarum literarum, 2nd edn. 2 vols. Basil. (1st edn. 1567.)Google Scholar

Fletcher, A. (1964) Allegory: The Theory of a Symbolic Mode. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Flores, E. (1996) “Gli Astronomica di Manilio e l'Epicureismo,” in Epicureismo greco e romano: Atti del congresso internazionale, Napoli, 19–26 maggio 1993, ed. Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M.. Naples. ii: 895–908.Google Scholar

Forster, E. S., and Furley, D. J. (trans.) (1955) Aristotle, On Sophistical Refutations. On Coming-to-be and Passing-away. [Aristotle] On the Cosmos. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W. (1966) “Plato Phaedrus 235c3,” Classical Philology vol. 61, no. 2: 108–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W. (2005) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Commentary Volume 8, Sources on Rhetoric and Poetics (Texts 666–713). Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W. (2006) “On the Composition of Aristotle's Rhetoric: Arguing the Issue, Emotional Appeal, Persuasion through Character, and Characters Tied to Age and Fortune,” in Fortenbaugh, , Aristotle's Practical Side: On His Psychology, Ethics, Politics and Rhetoric. Leiden and Boston. 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W., and White, S. A. (eds.) (2006) Aristo of Ceos: Text, Translation, and Discussion. New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1986) The Care of the Self: Volume 3 of The History of Sexuality. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2005) The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1981–82, ed. Gros, F.. Trans. Burchell, G.. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. (2002) Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De rerum natura, Book Two, Lines 1–332. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1974) “Xenophanes’ Empiricism and his Critique of Knowledge (b34),” in The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Mourelatos, A. P. D.. Garden City, NY. 118–31.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1993) Dichtung und Philosophie des frühen Griechentums: Eine Geschichte der griechischen Epik, Lyrik und Prosa bis zur Mitte des fünften Jahrhunderts, 4th edn. Munich. (1st edn. 1951.)Google Scholar

Frazer, J. G. (trans.) (1898) Pausanias's Description of Greece. 6 vols. London.Google Scholar

Friedländer, P. (1958) Plato: An Introduction. New York.Google Scholar

Frisk, H. (1973) Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, 2nd edn. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Fumaroli, M. (1986) “Rhétorique d’école et rhétorique adulte: remarques sur la réception européenne du traité Du sublime au xvi^e et au xvii^e siècle,” Revue d'histoire littéraire de la France vol. 86, no. 1: 33–51.Google Scholar

Fumaroli, M. (1990) “Le crépuscule de l'enthousiasme,” in Fumaroli, , Héros et orateurs: Rhétorique et dramaturgie cornéliennes. Geneva. 349–98.Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. (1999) “Cosmology,” in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Algra, K.. Cambridge. 412–51.Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. (2002) “Anaxagoras and the Naming of Parts,” in Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Graham, D. and Caston, V.. Aldershot. 119–26.Google Scholar

Fyfe, W. H. (trans.) (1932) Longinus, On the Sublime. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Gagarin, M. (2002) Antiphon the Athenian: Oratory, Law, and Justice in the Age of the Sophists. Austin.Google Scholar

Gagarin, M., and Woodruff, P. (1995) Early Greek Political Thought from Homer to the Sophists. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaiser, K. (ed.) (1988) Philodems Academica: Die Berichte über Platon und die Alte Akademie in zwei herkulanensischen Papyri. Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar

Gale, M. (1994) Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gale, M. (2011) “Digressions, Intertextuality, and Ideology in Didactic Poetry: The Case of Manilius,” in Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, ed. Green, S. J. and Volk, K.. Oxford. 205–21.Google Scholar

Gallavotti, C. (1975) “Empedocle nei papiri ercolanesi,” in Le monde grec: Pensée, littérature, histoire et documents. Hommages à Claire Préaux, ed. Bingen, J., Cambier, G. and Nachtergal, G.. Brussels. 153–61.Google Scholar

Garani, M. (2007) Empedocles Redivivus: Poetry and Analogy in Lucretius. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gärtner, H. (1990) “Demetriana varia,” Hermes vol. 118: 213–36.Google Scholar

Gauls, N. (2010) “The Manuscript Tradition,” in A Companion to the Greek Language, ed. Bakker, E.. Malden, MA. 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geigenmueller, P. (1908) “Quaestiones Dionysianae de vocabulis artis criticae.” Diss., Leipzig.Google Scholar

Gelzer, T. (1956) “Aristophanes und sein Sokrates,” Museum Helveticum vol. 13: 65–93.Google Scholar

Gerard, A. (1764) An Essay on Taste, 2nd edn. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Gercke, A., and Norden, E. (eds.) (1910) Einleitung in die Altertumswissenschaft. 3 vols. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar

Giannini, A. (1966) Paradoxographorum Graecorum reliquiae. Milan.Google Scholar

Gibbon, E. (1776) The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. 6 vols. London.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1995) Philodemus in Italy: The Books from Herculaneum. Trans. Obbink, D.. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilby, E. (2006) Sublime Worlds: Early Modern French Literature. London.Google Scholar

Gilby, E. (ed.) (2007) Pseudo-Longin, De la sublimité du discours. Chambéry.Google Scholar

Gladstone, W. E. (1889) “Phœnician Affinites of Ithaca,” The Nineteenth Century vol. 26: 280–93.Google Scholar

Göttling, K. W. (ed.) (1822) Theodosii Alexandrini grammatica. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Gomoll, H. (1933) “Caecilius’ Stellung zu den σχήματα διανοίας,” Rheinisches Museum vol. 82: 59–66.Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (ed.) (1965) Incerti auctoris Aetna. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (1984) “The ‘Aetna’: Thought, Antecedents, and Style,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt vol. 2.32.1: 344–63.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1961) “A Greek Professorial Circle at Rome,” Transactions of the American Philological Association vol. 92: 168–92.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (trans.) (1997) Manilius, M., Astronomica. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Goulet, R. (ed.) (1980) Cléomède: Théorie élémentaire (“De motu circulari corporum caelestium”). Paris.Google Scholar

Grafton, A., and Weinberg, J. (2011) “I Have Always Loved the Holy Tongue”: Isaac Casaubon, the Jews, and a Forgotten Chapter in Renaissance Scholarship. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graham, D. (2004) “Was Anaxagoras a Reductionist?,” Ancient Philosophy vol. 24: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graham, D. (2013) “The Theology of Nature in the Ionian Tradition,” Rhizomata vol. 1, no. 2: 194–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, R. P. H. (trans.) (1995) Augustine, De doctrina Christiana. Oxford.Google Scholar

Grene, D. (trans.) (1991) Aeschylus, Prometheus Bound, in Aeschylus ii: The Suppliant Maidens, The Persians, Seven Against Thebes, Prometheus Bound, ed. Grene, D. and Lattimore, R.. 2nd edn. Chicago.Google Scholar

Grenfell, B. P., and Hunt, A. S. (eds.) (1903) The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. iii. London.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1987) “Homer and Excess,” in Homer: Beyond Oral Poetry. Recent Trends in Homeric Interpretation, ed. Bremer, J. M., de Jong, I. J. F. and Kalff, J.. Amsterdam. 85–104.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (1978) “Aeschylus, Sicily and Prometheus,” in Dionysiaca: Nine Studies in Greek Poetry by Former Pupils. Presented to Sir Denys Page on his Seventieth Birthday, ed. Dawe, R. D., Diggle, J. and Easterling, P. E.. Cambridge. 105–41.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (ed.) (1983) Aeschylus, , Prometheus Bound. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Griswold, C. L. (1986) Self-Knowledge in Plato's Phaedrus. New Haven.Google Scholar

Grube, G. M. A. (1952) “Theophrastus as a Literary Critic,” Transactions of the American Philological Association vol. 83: 172–83.Google Scholar

Grube, G. M. A. (ed.) (1957a) Longinus, On Great Writing (On the Sublime). Trans. Grube, G. M. A., New York.Google Scholar

Grube, G. M. A. (1957b) “Notes on the Περὶ ὕψους,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 78, no. 4: 355–74.Google Scholar

Grube, G. M. A. (1959) “Theodorus of Gadara,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 80, no. 4: 337–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grube, G. M. A. (1961) A Greek Critic: Demetrius on Style. Toronto.Google Scholar

Gründler, H. (2012) “Orrore, terrore, timore: Vasari und das Erhabene,” in Translations of the Sublime: The Early Modern Reception and Dissemination of Longinus’ Peri hupsous in Rhetoric, the Visual Arts, Architecture and the Theatre, ed. van Eck, C., Bussels, S., Delbeke, M., and Pieters, J.. Leiden. 83–116.Google Scholar

Gudeman, A. (ed.) (1934) Aristoteles, Περὶ ποιητικῆς. Mit exegetischem Kommentar. Berlin.Google Scholar

Guerlac, S. (1985) “Longinus and the Subject of the Sublime,” New Literary History vol. 16, no. 2: 275–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gumbrecht, H. U. (2004) Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. (2011) “Manilius’ Conflicted Stoicism,” in Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, ed. Green, S. J. and Volk, K.. Oxford. 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hache, S. (2000) La langue du ciel: Le sublime en France au xvii^e siècle. Paris.Google Scholar

Hackforth, R. (trans.) (1945) Plato's Philebus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hackforth, R., (trans.) (1952) Plato's Phaedrus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hackforth, R., (trans.) (1955) Plato's Phaedo. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (1995a) Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, ed. Davidson, A. I.. Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (1995b) “The View from Above,” in Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, ed. Davidson, A. I.. Malden, MA. 238–50.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (1997) Plotin ou la simplicité du regard, 2nd edn. Paris. (1st edn. 1963.)Google Scholar

Haffter, H. (1935) “Sublimis,” Glotta vol. 23, no. 3/4: 251–61.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1986) Aristotle's Poetics. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2011) “Antidotes and Incantations: Is There a Cure for Poetry in Plato's Republic?,” in Plato and the Poets, ed. Destrée, P. and Herrmann, F.-G.. Leiden. 241–66.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2012) Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliwell, S., Fyfe, W. H., Russell, D. A., Innes, D., and Roberts, W. R. (trans.) (1995) Aristotle, Poetics; Longinus, On the Sublime; Demetrius, On Style. Cambridge, MA. (Repr. 1999.)Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1986) Virgil's Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1995) “The Presence of Lucretius in Paradise Lost,” Milton Quarterly vol. 29: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. (2007) “Lucretius and Later Latin Literature in Antiquity,” in The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, ed. Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P.. Cambridge. 111–27.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (2009) Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Häussler, R. (1995) “Zur Datierung der Schrift vom Erhabenen,” in Prinzipat und Kultur im 1. und 2. Jahrhundert: Wissenschaftliche Tagung der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena und der Iwane-Dshawachischwili-Universität Tbilissi, 27.–30. Oktober 1992 in Jena, ed. Kühnert, B., Riedel, V. and Gordeziani, R. V.. Bonn. 141–63.Google Scholar

Havelock, E. A. (1972) “The Socratic Self As It Is Parodied in Aristophanes’ Clouds,” Yale Classical Studies vol. 22: 1–18.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (1999) “Longinus, On Sublimity,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society n.s. vol. 45: 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, M. (2012) “Longinus and the Ancient Sublime,” in The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present, ed. Costelloe, T. M.. Cambridge. 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1975) Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. Trans. Knox, T. M.. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2011) “Watch This Space (Getting Round 1.215–46),” in Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, ed. Green, S. J. and Volk, K.. Oxford. 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendrickson, G. L. (1905) “The Origin and Meaning of the Ancient Characters of Style,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 26, no. 3: 249–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendrix, H. (2005) “Renaissance Roots of the Sublime: Ugliness, Horror and Pleasure in Early Modern Italian Debates on Literature and Art,” in Histories of the Sublime: 9–10 December 2005, ed. Madelein, C., Pieters, J. and Vandenabeele, B.. Brussels. 13–22.Google Scholar

Henry, A. (ed.) (1986) The Mirour of mans saluacioun[e]: A Middle English Translation of Speculum humanae salvationis. Aldershot.Google Scholar

Hertz, N. (1983) “A Reading of Longinus,” Critical Inquiry vol. 9, no. 3: 579–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hesk, J. (2000) Deception and Democracy in Classical Athens. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hidber, T. (1996) Das klassizistische Manifest des Dionys von Halikarnass: Die Praefatio zu “De oratoribus veteribus.” Einleitung, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, D. J. (2005) Divinity and Maximal Greatness. London.Google Scholar

Hogarth, W. (1753) The Analysis of Beauty: Written with a View of Fixing the Fluctuating Ideas of Taste. London.Google Scholar

Holtz, L. (1997) “Titre et incipit,” in Titres et articulations du texte dans les oeuvres antiques: Actes du colloque international de Chantilly, 13–15 décembre 1994, ed. Fredouille, J. C., Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Hoffmann, P., et al. Paris. 469–89.Google Scholar

Hommel, H. (1951) “Aristophanes über die Nilschwelle,” Rheinisches Museum vol. 44: 315–27.Google Scholar

Hooley, D. (2012) “Prelude: Classical Mountain Landscapes and the Language of Ascent,” in Heights of Reflection: Mountains in the German Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Twenty-First Century, ed. Ireton, S. M. and Schaumann, C.. Rochester, NY. 20–32.Google Scholar

Housman, A. E. (ed.) (1903–30) M. Manilii Astronomicon. 5 vols. London.Google Scholar

Hubbard, M. E. (trans.) (1972) Aristotle, Poetics, in Ancient Literary Criticism: The Principal Texts in New Translations, ed. Russell, D. A. and Winterbottom, M. Oxford.Google Scholar

Huet, P.-D., and Le Clerc, J. (1706) “Examen du sentiment de Longin sur ce passage de la Genese: & Dieu dit: que la lumiere soit faite & la lumiere fut faite,” in Bibliotheque choisie, pour servir de suite à la Bibliotheque universelle, ed. Le Clerc, J.. Amsterdam. x:211–60.Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1985) Essays Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, E. F.. Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Hunink, V. J. C. (1989) “Ondergrondse stromen: Lucretius en de Aetna-dichter,” Lampas vol. 22: 22–35.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (1995) “Written in the Stars: Poetry and Philosophy in the Phaenomena of Aratus,” Arachnaion vol. 1, no. 2. www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num2/hunter.html (Accessed 2 August 2011).Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2009) Critical Moments in Classical Literature: Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and its Uses. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. (2012) Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurwit, J. M. (1985) The Art and Culture of Early Greece, 1100–480 B.C. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (ed.) (1985) Aeschylus, Septem contra Thebas. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2011) “Politics and the Sublime in the Panegyricus,” in Pliny's Praise: The Panegyricus in the Roman World, ed. Roche, P. A.. Cambridge. 125–41.Google Scholar

Hyde, W. W. (1915) “The Ancient Appreciation of Mountain Scenery,” The Classical Journal vol. 11, no. 2: 70–84.Google Scholar

Innes, D. C. (1979) “Gigantomachy and Natural Philosophy,” The Classical Quarterly n.s. vol. 29: 165–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Innes, D. C. (1985) “Theophrastus and the Theory of Style,” in Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life and Work, ed. Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P. M. and Long, A. A.. New Brunswick. 251–67.Google Scholar

Innes, D. C. (1995) “Longinus, Sublimity, and Low Emotions,” in Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday, ed. Innes, D., Hine, H. M. and Pelling, C. B. R.. Oxford. 323–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Innes, D. C. (2002) “Longinus and Caecilius: Models of the Sublime,” Mnemosyne vol. 55, no. 3: 259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaeger, C. S. (ed.) (2010) Magnificence and the Sublime in Medieval Aesthetics: Art, Architecture, Literature, Music. New York.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1981) “The Dominant,” in Selected Writings, Volume iii: Poetry of Grammar and Grammar of Poetry, ed. Rudy, S.. The Hague and New York. 751–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jameson, F. (1973) “The Vanishing Mediator: Narrative Structure in Max Weber,” New German Critique vol. 1 (Winter): 52–89. (Repr. in Fredric Jameson, The Ideologies of Theory: Essays, 1971–1986 (Minneapolis, 1988), ii:3–34.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jankélévitch, V. (1980) Le je-ne-sais-quoi et le presque-rien. 3 vols. Paris. (1st edn. 1957.)Google Scholar

Jankélévitch, V. (1986) L'imprescriptible. Pardonner? Dans l'honneur et la dignité. Paris.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (ed.) (1987) Aristotle, , Poetics i. Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (1992) The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume iv: Books 13–16. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (ed.) (2000) Philodemus, On Poems, Book 1. Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (ed.) (2010) Philodemus, On Poems, Books 3–4: With the Fragments of Aristotle, On Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jebb, R. C. (1882) “Pindar,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies vol. 3: 144–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jex-Blake, K., Sellers, E., and Urlichs, H. L. (1896) The Elder Pliny's Chapters on the History of Art. Translated by Jex-Blake, K.. With Commentary and Historical Introduction by Sellers, E. and Additional Notes Contributed by Urlichs, Heinrich Ludwig. London. (Repr. Chicago, 1976.)Google Scholar

Johnson, M., and Wilson, C. (2007) “Lucretius and the History of Science,” in The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, ed. Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P.. Cambridge. 131–48.Google Scholar

Jones, R. M. (1926) “Posidonius and the Flight of the Mind through the Universe,” Classical Philology vol. 21, no. 2: 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kafka, F. (1992) Nachgelassene Schriften und Fragmente ii, ed. Schillemeit, J.. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. (1985) “The Place of the Prime Mover in Aristotle's Teleology,” in Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to David M. Balme on his Seventieth Birthday, ed. Balme, D. M. and Gotthelf, A.. Pittsburgh, PA and Bristol, England. 183–205.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (1992) “Aristotle on Thinking,” in Essays on Aristotle's De anima, ed. Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A.. Oxford. 359–79.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (1997) “Greek Religion and Philosophy in the Sisyphus Fragment,” Phronesis vol. 42, no. 3: 247–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaibel, G. (1899) “Cassius Longinus und die Schrift Περὶ ὕψους,” Hermes vol. 34, no. 1: 107–32.Google Scholar

Kambylis, A. (ed.) (1991) Eustathius, Prooimion zum Pindarkommentar. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Kannicht, R. (ed.) (1969) Euripides, Helena. 2 vols. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1996) Practical Philosophy. Trans. Mary Gregor, J.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment, ed. Guyer, P.. Trans. Guyer, P. and Matthews, E.. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann, W. (1974) Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist, 4th edn. Princeton. (1st edn. 1950.)Google Scholar

Keats, J. (1982) Complete Poems, ed. Stillinger, J.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (2011) “Sums in Verse or a Mathematical Aesthetic?,” in Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, ed. Green, S. J. and Volk, K.. Oxford. 165–87.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (trans.) (2007) Aristotle, , On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. New York.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S. (1989) The Concept of Irony, with Continual Reference to Socrates, together with Notes of Schelling's Berlin Lectures. Trans. Hong, Howard Vincent and Hong, E. H.. Princeton.Google Scholar

Killeen, J. F. (1973) “Sappho fr. 111,” The Classical Quarterly n.s. vol. 23, no. 2: 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kindstrand, J. F. (1982) The Stylistic Evaluation of Aeschines in Antiquity. Uppsala and Stockholm.Google Scholar

Kingsley, P. (1995) Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kircher, A. (1665) Athanasii Kircheri Mundus subterraneus, in xii libros digestus; quo Divinum Subterrestris Mundi Opificium, mira Ergasteriorum Naturae in eo distributio, verbo παντάμορφον Protei regnum, Universae denique Naturae Majestas & divitiae summa rerum varietate exponuntur. Abditorum effectuum causae acri indagine inquisitae demonstrantur; cognitae per artis & naturae conjugium ad humanae vitae necessarium usum vario experimentorum apparatu, necnon novo modo, & ratione applicantur. 2 vols. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Kirk, G. S. (1963) “A Fragment of Sappho Reinterpreted,” The Classical Quarterly n.s. vol. 13, no. 1: 51–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M. (1983) The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts, 2nd edn. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knudsen, Rachel Ahern (2014). Homeric Speech and the Origins of Rhetoric. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Köhnken, A. (2002) “Licht und Schatten bei Pseudo-Longin,” in Alvarium: Festschrift für Christian Gnilka. Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum, Ergänzungsband 33, ed. Blümer, W., Henke, R. and Mülke, M.. Münster. 211–18.Google Scholar

Koninck, T. D. (1994) “Aristotle on God as Thought Thinking Itself,” The Review of Metaphysics vol. 47, no. 3: 471–515.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2014) Beauty: The Fortunes of an Ancient Greek Idea. New York.Google Scholar

Körte, A. (1890) “Metrodori Epicurei fragmenta,” Jahrbücher für classische Philologie Suppl. Bd. 17: 571–91.Google Scholar

Körte, A. (1929) “χαρακτήρ,” Hermes vol. 64: 69–86.Google Scholar

Kosman, A. (2000) “Metaphysics Λ 9: Divine Thought,” in Aristotle's Metaphysics Lambda: Symposium Aristotelicum, ed. Frede, M. and Charles, D.. Oxford. 307–26.Google Scholar

Koster, W. J. W. (ed.) (1975) Prolegomena de comoedia. Scholia in Aristophanem, Fasc. 1A. Gröningen.Google Scholar

Kowalzig, B. (2007) Singing for the Gods: Performances of Myth and Ritual in Archaic and Classical Greece. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kristeller, P. O. (1990) “The Modern System of the Arts,” in Kristeller, , Renaissance Thought and the Arts: Collected Essays. Expanded edn. Princeton. 163–227. (First published in the Journal of the History of Ideas 12 (1951) 496–527 and 13 (1952) 17–46.)Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1918) “Die historische Stellung von Horazens Ars poetica,” Sokrates: Zeitschrift für Gymnasialwesen n.s. vol. 6, no. 3/4: 81–98.Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1940) “Rhetorik,” in Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Supplement, ed. von Pauly, A. F., Wissowa, G., Kroll, W., et al. 16 vols. Stuttgart. vii: 1039–138.Google Scholar

Krumbacher, A. (1920) Die Stimmbildung der Redner im Altertum bis auf die Zeit Quintilians. Paderborn.Google Scholar

Kühn, J. H. (1941) ὕψος: Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Aufschwungsgedankens von Platon bis Poseidonios. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. (1991) The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. (2007) “Archaic Greek Poetry,” in The Cambridge Companion to Archaic Greece, ed. Shapiro, H. A.. Cambridge. 141–68.Google Scholar

Kurtz, E., and Drexl, F. (eds.) (1936–1941) Psellus, M., Scripta minora, magnam partem adhuc inedita. 2 vols. Milan.Google Scholar

Lacan, J. (1986) Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan. Livre vii: L’Éthique de la psychanalyse [1959–1960], ed. Miller, J.-A.. Paris.Google Scholar

Lacan, J. (2001) Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan. Livre viii: Le Transfert [1960–61], ed. Miller, J.-A.. 2nd, corrected edn. Paris.Google Scholar

Lacoue-Labarthe, P. (1991a) “Sublime Truth (Part 1),” Trans. Kuchta, D.. Cultural Critique, no. 18: 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacoue-Labarthe, P. (1991b) “Sublime Truth (Part 2),” Trans. Kuchta, D.. Cultural Critique, no. 20: 207–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (2003) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago. (First published 1980.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laks, A. (1983) Diogéne d'Apollonie: La dernière cosmologie présocratique. Lille and Paris.Google Scholar

Laks, A. (1993) “Mind's Crisis: On Anaxagoras’ νοῦς,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy vol. 31, Supplement: 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laks, A. (2000) “Metaphysics Λ 7,” in Aristotle's Metaphysics Lambda: Symposium Aristotelicum, ed. Frede, M. and Charles, D.. Oxford. 207–43.Google Scholar

Laks, A. (2002) “‘Philosophes présocratiques’: Remarques sur la construction d'une catégorie de l'historiographie philosophique,” in Qu'est-ce que la philosophie présocratique? What is Presocratic Philosophy?, ed. Laks, A. and Louguet, C.. Villeneuve-d'Ascq. 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laks, A. (2006) Introduction à la “philosophie présocratique”. Paris.Google Scholar

Lamb, J. (1993) “Longinus, the Dialectic, and the Practice of Mastery,” ELH vol. 60, no. 3: 545–67.Google Scholar

Lamberton, R. (1986) Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Lamy, B. (1676) The Art of Speaking. 2 vols. London.Google Scholar

Landolfi, L. (1990) “Manilio e le ansie dell'insegnamento: L’excursus metodologico (Astr. ii, 750–787),” Pan vol. 10: 27–37.Google Scholar

Landolfi, L. (1992) “Caeli cavernae: fortuna di uno stilema,” Vichiana 3rd series, vol. 3, no. 1–2: 208–19.Google Scholar

Landolfi, L. (2003) Integra prata: Manilio, i proemi. Bologna.Google Scholar

Langdon, H. (2004) “A Theatre of Marvels: The Poetics of Salvator Rosa,” Konsthistorisk Tidskrift vol. 73, no. 3: 179–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langdon, H. (2011) “The Representation of Philosophers in the Art of Salvator Rosa,” kunsttexte.de vol. 2: 1–17. http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/kunsttexte/20112/langdon-helen-4/PDF/langdon.pdf (accessed 12/01/2014)Google Scholar

Lapidge, M. (1979) “Lucan's Imagery of Cosmic Dissolution,” Hermes vol. 107, no. 3: 344–70.Google Scholar

Lassandro, D. (1993) “Nosse fidem rerum: L'elogio della scienza nell’Aetna,” Bollettino di studi latini vol. 23: 320–8.Google Scholar

Lattimore, R. (trans.) (1951) Homer, The Iliad. Chicago.Google Scholar

Laurent, J. (2011) L’Éclair dans la nuit: Plotin et la puissance du beau. Chatou.Google Scholar

Le Bœuffle, A. (1987) Astronomie, astrologie: Lexique Latin. Paris.Google Scholar

Leaf, W. (ed.) (1900) The Iliad. Edited, with Apparatus Criticus, Prolegomena, Notes, and Appendices. 2 vols. 2nd edn. London and New York.Google Scholar

Lear, J. (1988) Aristotle: The Desire to Understand. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lear, J. (1995) “Testing the Limits: The Place of Tragedy in Aristotle's Ethics,” in Aristotle and Moral Realism, ed. Heinaman, R.. Boulder. 61–84.Google Scholar

Lebeck, A. (1972) “The Central Myth of Plato's Phaedrus,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies vol. 13: 267–90.Google Scholar

Lech, M. L. (2008) “A Possible Date of the Revival of Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes,” The Classical Quarterly vol. 58, no. 2: 661–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. F. von (1849–1863) Leibnizens mathematische Schriften, ed. Gerhardt, C. I.. 7 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (2006) “Statius and the Sublimity of Capaneus,” in Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition Presented to Jasper Griffin, ed. Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. G. F. and Lyne, R. O. A. M.. Oxford. 217–41.Google Scholar

Lentricchia, F. (1983) Criticism and Social Change. Chicago.Google Scholar

Lesher, J. H. (ed.) (1992) Xenophanes of Colophon: Fragments. A Text and Translation with Commentary. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liers, H. (1885) “Zur Geschichte der rhetorischen Ideenlehre,” Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Paedagogik vol. 131: 577–89.Google Scholar

Litman, T. A. (1971) Le sublime en France (1660–1714). Paris.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1979) Magic, Reason, and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1990) Demystifying Mentalities. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lobsien, V. O., and Olk, C. (2007) Neuplatonismus und Ästhetik: Zur Transformationsgeschichte des Schönen. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Logan, J. (1999) “Longinus and the Sublime,” in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: The Renaissance, ed. Norton, G. P.. Cambridge. 529–39.Google Scholar

Lokaj, R. (ed.) (2006) Petrarch's Ascent of Mount Ventoux: The Familiaris iv, i Rome.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1997) “Lucretius on Nature and the Epicurean Self,” in Lucretius and his Intellectual Background, ed. Algra, K., Koenen, M. H. and Schrijvers, P. H.. Amsterdam. 128–32.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1999a) “The Scope of Early Greek Philosophy,” in The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A.. Cambridge. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A. (ed.) (1999b) The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lorimer, W. L. (ed.) (1951) De mundo. Rome.Google Scholar

Lowth, R. (1815) Lectures on the Sacred Poetry of the Hebrews. Trans. Gregory, G.. Boston.Google Scholar

Lucas, D. W. (ed.) (1968) Aristotle, Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lühr, F.-F. (1969) “Ratio und Fatum: Dichtung und Lehre bei Manilius.” Diss., J.-W. Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Lühr, F.-F. (1971) “Die Kritik des Aetna-Dichters an Manilius,” Hermes vol. 99, no. 2: 141–9.Google Scholar

Luschnat, O. (1954) “Die Thukydidesscholien: Zu ihrer handschriftlichen Grundlage, Herkunft und Geschichte,” Philologus vol. 98: 14–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lutz, J., and Perdrizet, P. (eds.) (1907) Speculum humanae salvationis: Texte critique. Traduction inédite de Jean Miélot (1448). Les sources et l'influence iconographique principalement sur l'art alsacien du xiv^e siècle, avec la reproduction en 140 planches du Manuscrit de Sélestat de la série complète des vitraux de Mulhouse, de vitraux de Colmar, de Wissembourg [etc.]. Vol. i. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Luzzatto, T. (1981) “Pseudo Longino e Cecilio di Calatte: A proposito di un giudizio su Eschilo,” Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica vol. 53: 50–100.Google Scholar

Lynn-George, M. (1988) Epos: Word, Narrative and the Iliad. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyotard, J.-F. (1982) “Presenting the Unpresentable: The Sublime,” Artforum vol. 20 no. 8: 64–9.Google Scholar

Lyotard, J.-F. (1991) “The Sublime and the Avant-garde,” in The Inhuman: Reflections on Time, trans. Bennington, G. and Bowlby, R.. Stanford. 89–107. (First published in Arforum no. 8 (April) 1984, 36–43.)Google Scholar

Lyotard, J.-F. (1994) Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime: Kant's Critique of Judgment, §§ 23–29. Stanford.Google Scholar

Machacek, G. (2011) Milton and Homer: “Written to Aftertimes.” Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Maguire, J. P. (1939) “The Sources of the Pseudo-Aristotle De Mundo,” Yale Classical Studies vol. 6: 3–67.Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. (2002) Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mangoni, C. (ed.) (1993) Filodemo: Il quinto libro della Poetica (P. Herc. 1425 e 1538). Naples.Google Scholar

Mann, W.-R. (2011) “On Two Stoic ‘Paradoxes’ in Manilius,” in Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, ed. Green, S. J. and Volk, K.. Oxford. 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1980) “Anaxagoras’ Other World,” Phronesis vol. 25: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1992a) “A Theophrastean Excursus on God and Nature and its Aftermath in Hellenistic Thought,” Phronesis vol. 37: 314–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1992b) “Περὶ κόσμου: A Note on the History of a Title,” Vigiliae Christianae vol. 46, no. 4: 391–411.Google Scholar

Marg, W. (ed.) (1972) Timaeus Locrus, De natura mundi et animae: Überlieferung, Testimonia, Text und Übersetzung. Leiden.Google Scholar

Marini, N. (ed.) (2007) Demetrio, Lo Stile. Rome.Google Scholar

Martin, É. M. (2012) “The ‘Prehistory’ of the Sublime in Early Modern France,” in The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present, ed. Costelloe, T. M.. Cambridge. 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marx, F. (1898) “Die Zeit der Schrift vom Erhabenen,” Wiener Studien vol. 20: 169–204.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1964) The Economic & Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, ed. Struik, D. J.. New York.Google Scholar

Mastronarde, D. J. (1990) “Actors on High: The Skene Roof, the Crane, and the Gods in Attic Drama,” Classical Antiquity vol. 9: 247–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matthieson, K. (1968) “Zur Theonoeszene der euripideischen ‘Helena’,” Hermes vol. 96: 685–704.Google Scholar

Mayer, A. (ed.) (1910) Theophrasti Περὶ λέξεως libri fragmenta. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Mayhew, R. (2010) “The Theology of the Laws,” in Plato's Laws: A Critical Guide, ed. Bobonich, C.. Cambridge. 197–216.Google Scholar

Mazzoli, G. (1996) “Orazio e il sublime,” in Doctus Horatius: Atti del Convegno di Studi per Virginio Cremona (Brescia 9–10 febbraio 1995), ed. Cova, P. V.. Milano. 21–40.Google Scholar

Mazzucchi, C. M. (1989) “La tradizione manoscritta del Περὶ ὕψους,” Italia medioevale e umanistica vol. 32: 206–26.Google Scholar

Mazzucchi, C. M. (ed.) (2010) Dionisio Longino, Del sublime: Introduzione, testa critico, traduzione e commentario. Rev. and enlarged edn. Milan. (1st edn. 1992).Google Scholar

Meijering, R. (1987) Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia. Groningen.Google Scholar

Meister, K. (1925) Die Hausschwelle in Sprache und Religion der Römer. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Menn, S. (1992) “Aristotle and Plato on God as Nous and as the Good,” The Review of Metaphysics vol. 45, no. 3: 543–73.Google Scholar

Michel, A. (1969) “Rhétorique, tragédie, philosophie: Sénèque et le sublime,” Giornale italiano di filologia vol. 21: 245–57.Google Scholar

Michel, A. (1976) “Rhétorique et poétique: La theorie du sublime de Platon aux modernes,” Révue des Études Latines vol. 54: 278–307.Google Scholar

Michel, A. (1986) “Sublime et Parole de Dieu: De Saint Augustin à Fenelon,” Revue d'histoire littéraire de la France vol. 86, no. 1: 52–61.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1963) “Thoughts on Poetry and its Varieties,” in Autobiography and Literary Essays, ed. Robson, J. M. and Stillinger, J.. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto. Vol. i: 341–65.Google Scholar

Miller, J.-A. (1977/8) “Suture (Elements of the Logic of the Signifier),” Screen vol. 18, no. 4: 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, M. (2001) “‘First of all’: On the Semantics and Ethics of Hesiod's Cosmogony,” Ancient Philosophy vol. 21: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, M. (2006) “Ambiguity and Transport: Reflections on the Proem to Parmenides’ Poem,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy vol. 30: 1–47.Google Scholar

Monk, S. H. (1960 [1935]) The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in xviii-Century England. [Ann Arbor]. (1st edn. 1935.)Google Scholar

Montiglio, S. (2006) “Should the Aspiring Wise Man Travel? A Conflict in Seneca's Thought,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 127 , no. 4: 553–86.Google Scholar

Montiglio, S. (2011) From Villain to Hero: Odysseus in Ancient Thought. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, W., and Wilson, H. A. (trans.) (1956) Select Writings and Letters of Gregory, Bishop of Nyssa. Grand Rapids.Google Scholar

More, H. (1646) Democritus Platonissans, or, An essay upon the infinity of worlds out of Platonick principles. Hereunto is annexed Cupids conflict, together with the Philosophers devotion: And a particular interpretation appertaining to the three last books of the Song of the soul. Cambridge.Google Scholar

More, H. (1662) A Collection of Several Philosophical Writings of Dr. Henry More. London.Google Scholar

More, H. (1682) Annotations upon the two foregoing treatises, Lux orientalis, or, An enquiry into the opinion of the Eastern sages concerning the prae-existence of souls, and the Discourse of truth (etc.). London.Google Scholar

Morgan, K. A. (2000) Myth and Philosophy from the Presocratics to Plato. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morpurgo-Tagliabue, G. (1979 [1980]) “Il χαρακτὴρ δεινός di Demetrio e la sua datazione,” Rendiconti dell’ Accademia di archeologia, lettere e belle arti di Napoli n.s. vol. 54: 281–318.Google Scholar

Morris, D. B. (1972) The Religious Sublime: Christian Poetry and Critical Tradition in 18th-Century England. Lexington.Google Scholar

Morton, T. (2011) “Sublime Objects,” Speculations: A Journal of Speculative Realism vol. 2: 207–27.Google Scholar

Morton, T. (2013) Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Most, G. (2012) “The Sublime, Today?,” in Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism, ed. Holmes, B. and Shearin, W. H.. New York. 239–66.Google Scholar

Münscher, K. (1920) Xenophon in der griechisch-römischen Literatur. Philologus. Supplementband, 13.2. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Mutschmann, H. (1913) Tendenz, Aufbau und Quellen der Schrift vom Erhabenen. Berlin.Google Scholar

Mutschmann, H. (1917) “Das Genesiscitat in der Schrift Περὶ ὕψους,” Hermes vol. 52, no. 2: 161–200.Google Scholar

Myers, K. S. (1994) Ovid's Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nachmanson, E. (1941) Der griechische Buchtitel: Einige Beobachtungen. Göteborg. (Repr. Darmstadt, 1969.)Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (1986) The View from Nowhere. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1990) Pindar's Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nancy, J.-L. (1984) “L'Offrande sublime,” Po&sie vol. 30: 76–103.Google Scholar

Nassal, F. (1910) “Aesthetisch-rhetorische Beziehungen zwischen Dionysius von Halicarnass und Cicero.” Diss., Tübingen.Google Scholar

Neer, R. (2010) The Emergence of the Classical Style in Greek Sculpture. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nehamas, A. (2007) Only a Promise of Happiness: The Place of Beauty in a World of Art. Princeton.Google Scholar

Nelis, D. (2004) “Georgics 2.458–542: Virgil, Aratus and Empedocles.” In Dictynna, 1. Université Charles de Gaulle, Lille 3. http://dictynna.revues.org/161 (Accessed 20 September 2013.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ngai, S. (2012) Our Aesthetic Categories: Zany, Cute, Interesting. Cambridge MA.Google Scholar

Nicholson, N. J. (2005) Aristocracy and Athletics in Archaic and Classical Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Nicolson, M. H. (1963) Mountain Gloom and Mountain Glory: The Development of the Aesthetics of the Infinite. New York.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. (1967) The Will to Power. Trans. Kaufmann, Walter and Hollingdale, R. J.. New York.Google Scholar

Nightingale, A. W. (2004) Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in its Cultural Context. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nightingale, A. W. (2007) “Night-Vision: Epicurean Eschatology,” Arion vol. 14, no. 3: 61–98.Google Scholar

Norden, E. (1923) Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen zur Formengeschichte religiöser Rede. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar

Nünlist, R. (2009) The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Brien, D. (1996) “Plotinus on Matter and Evil,” in The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, ed. Gerson, L. P.. Cambridge. 171–95.Google Scholar

O'Donnell, J. J. (ed.) (1992) Augustine, Confessions. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

O'Sullivan, N. (1992) Alcidamas, Aristophanes, and the Beginnings of Greek Stylistic Theory. Hermes Einzelschriften, vol. 60. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

O'Sullivan, N. (1997) “Caecilius, the ‘Canons’ of Writers, and the Origins of Atticism,” in Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature, ed. Dominik, W. J.. London. 32–49.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (2011) “Empedocles and Hellenistic Editions of the Presocratics,” Unpublished talk, Fondation Hardt, Geneva, 14 October 2011.Google Scholar

Oder, E. (1899) Ein angebliches Bruchstück Democrits über die Entdeckung unterirdischer Quellen. Philologus. Supplementband, vol. 7. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Ofenloch, E. (ed.) (1907) Caecilii Calactini fragmenta. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Orth, E. (1926) Logios. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Osborne, C. (1987) Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy: Hippolytus of Rome and the Presocratics. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Otto, P. (1906) “Quaestiones selectae ad libellum qui est Περὶ ὕψους spectantes.” Diss., Kiel.Google Scholar

Overbeck, J. A. (1868) Die antiken Schriftquellen zur Geschichte der bildenden Künste bei den Griechen. Leipzig. (Repr. Hildesheim, 1959.)Google Scholar

Paine, T. (1795) The Age of Reason. Part the Second. Being an Investigation of True and of Fabulous Theology. London.Google Scholar

Panofsky, E. (1979 [1946]) Abbot Suger on the Abbey Church of St.-Denis and its Art Treasures, ed. Panofsky-Soergel, G.. 2nd edn. Princeton.Google Scholar

Papaioannou, S. (2013) Michael Psellos: Rhetoric and Authorship in Byzantium. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, D. (2014) “The Hebrew Roots of Sublimity,” Seminar Paper, “Longinus and the Sublime” Seminar, UCLA Spring 2014.Google Scholar

Passannante, G. (2011) The Lucretian Renaissance: Philology and the Afterlife of Tradition. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patillon, M. (ed.) (2002) Pseudo-Aelius Aristide, Arts rhétoriques: Livre 1, Le discours politique. Paris.Google Scholar

Patillon, M., and Brisson, L. (eds.) (2001) Longin: Fragments. Art rhétorique. Rufus: Art rhétorique. Paris.Google Scholar

Patrizi, F. (1586) Della poetica … : La deca istoriale. Ferrara.Google Scholar

Patterson, A. M. (1970) Hermogenes and the Renaissance: Seven Ideas of Style. Princeton.Google Scholar

Pendrick, G. J. (ed.) (2002) Antiphon: The Fragments. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pernot, L. (2006) L'ombre du tigre: Recherches sur la réception de Démosthène. Naples.Google Scholar

Petit, P. (1683) Selectorum poematum libri duo: Accessit dissertatio de furore poetico. 2 vols. in 1. Paris.Google Scholar

Petrarch, F. (1985) Selections from the Canzoniere and Other Works. Trans. Musa, M.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, J. (2001) Contemplatio Caeli: Untersuchungen zum Motiv der Himmelsbetrachtung in lateinischen Texten der Antike und des Mittelalters. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Pfister, F. (1959) “Ekstase,” in Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum, ed. Klauser, T.. iv: 945–88.Google Scholar

Philippson, R. (1925) “Zu Περὶ ὕψους,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie vol. 74: 267–79.Google Scholar

Philippson, R. (1943) “Papyrus Herculanensis 831,” The American Journal of Philology vol. 64, no. 2: 148–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ploeg, S. M. (2006) “Staged Experiences: Architecture and Rhetoric in the Work of Sir Henry Wotton, Nicholas Hawksmoor and Sir John Vanbrugh.” Diss., Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar

Pohl, K. (1968) “Die Lehre von den drei Wortfügungsarten: Untersuchungen zu Dionysios von Halikarnaß, De compositione verborum.” Diss., Eberhardt-Karls-Universität zu Tübingen.Google Scholar

Poland, L. (1990) “The Bible and the Rhetorical Sublime,” in The Bible as Rhetoric: Studies in Biblical Persuasion and Credibility, ed. Warner, M.. London. 29–50.Google Scholar

Poliakoff, M. (1980) “Nectar, Springs, and the Sea: Critical Terminology in Pindar and Callimachus,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik vol. 39: 41–7.Google Scholar

Pollitt, J. J. (1974) The Ancient View of Greek Art: Criticism, History, and Terminology. New Haven.Google Scholar

Pontani, F. (ed.) (2005) Eraclito, Questioni omeriche: Sulle allegorie di Omero in merito agli dèi. Pisa.Google Scholar

Pope, A. (1719) An Essay on Criticism, 6th, corr. edn. London. (1st edn. 1711.)Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (1986) “The Material Sublime: Towards a Reconstruction of Materialist Critical Discourse and Aesthetics in Antiquity.” Diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (1992) “Hermeneutic Lines and Circles: Aristarchus and Crates on Homeric Exegesis,” in Homer's Ancient Readers: The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic's Earliest Exegetes, ed. Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. J.. Princeton. 67–114.Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (1993) “The Seductions of Gorgias,” Classical Antiquity vol. 12, no. 2: 267–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, J. I. (1995a) “οἱ κριτικοί: A Reassessment,” in Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle: A Collection of Papers in Honour of D. M. Schenkeveld, ed. Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R. and Sluiter, I.. Amsterdam. 83–109.Google Scholar