Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T06:54:51.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Law and Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Catherine Marco
Affiliation:
Wright State University, Ohio
Raquel Schears
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic Emergency Medicine, Minnesota
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

For Further Reading

American College of Emergency Physicians. (1998). Non-benefical (“futile”) emergency medical interventions. Policy approved March 1998. www.acep.org/policy/PO400198.HTMGoogle Scholar
Derse, A. R. (2005). What part of “no” don’t you understand? Patient refusal of recommended treatment in the emergency department. Mt. Sinai Journal of Medicine, 72, 221227.Google Scholar
Derse, A. R. (2012). Futility in emergency medicine. In Jesus, J., Grossman, S. A., Derse, A. R., Adams, J. G., Wolf, R., & Rosen, P. (Eds.), Ethical problems in emergency medicine: A discussion based review (pp. 117125). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesus, J. E., Geiderman, J. M., Venkat, A., Limehouse, W. E., Derse, A. R., Larkin, G. L., & Henrichs, C. W. III (2014). Physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) and emergency medicine: Ethical considerations, legal issues, and emerging trends. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 64, 140144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Limehouse, W., Feeser, V. R., Bookman, K., & Derse, A. R. (2012a). A model for emergency department end-of-life communications after acute devastating events – part I: Decision-making capacity, surrogates, & advance directives. Academic Emergency Medicine, 19, 10681072.Google Scholar
Limehouse, W., Feeser, V. R., Bookman, K., & Derse, A. R. (2012b). A model for emergency department end-of-life communications after acute devastating events – part II: Moving from resuscitative to end of life or palliative treatment. Academic Emergency Medicine, 19, 13001308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meisel, A. (1993). The consensus about forgoing life-sustaining treatment: Its status and prospects. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2, 309345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moskop, J. C., Geiderman, J. M., Hobgood, C. D., & Larkin, G. L. (2006). Emergency physicians and disclosure of medical errors. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 48, 523531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moskop, J. C., & Iserson, K. V. (2001). Emergency physicians and physician-assisted suicide, part II: Emergency care for patients who have attempted physician-assisted suicide. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 38, 576582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moskop, J. C., Marco, C. A., Larkin, G. L., Geiderman, J. M., & Derse, A. R. (2005). From Hippocrates to HIPAA: Privacy and confidentiality in emergency medicine – part I: Conceptual, moral, and legal foundations. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 45, 5359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moskop, J. C., Marco, C. A., Larkin, G. L., Geiderman, J. M., & Derse, A. R. (2005). From Hippocrates to HIPAA: Privacy and confidentiality in emergency medicine – part II: Challenges in the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 45, 6067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, W. L., Keeton, W. P., Dobbs, D. B., Keeton, R. E., & Owen, D. G. (1984). Prosser and Keeton on torts (5th edn., p. 113). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Salgo v. Leland Stanford etc. Bd. Trustees, 154 Cal.App.2d 560, 317 P.2d 170 (1957).Google Scholar
Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 211 N.Y. 125, 105 N.E. 92 (1914).Google Scholar
Schneider, C. E. (1994). Bioethics in the language of the law. Hastings Center Report, 24(4), 1622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, P. H., Agin, W. S., & Douglas, S. P. (2013). What does the law say to Good Samaritans?: A review of Good Samaritan statutes in 50 states and on US airlines. Chest, 143(6), 17741783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×