John R. Boyd Papers, USMC University, Quantico, VA.Google Scholar

Bernard Brodie Papers. UCLA Library. Special Collections. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar

Smedley Butler Papers. USMC University, Quantico, VA.Google Scholar

Henry Eccles Papers. Naval War College Library, Special Collections. Newport, RI.Google Scholar

Herman Kahn Papers. National Defense University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

William L. Mitchell Papers. Library of Congress, Special Collections. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Robert E. Osgood Papers. Johns Hopkins University Library, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Herbert Rosinski Papers. Naval War College Library, Special Collections. Newport, RI.Google Scholar

Harry G. Summers Papers. Army Historical and Education Center. Carlisle, PA.Google Scholar

Abadinsky, H. The Criminal Elite: Professional and Organized Crime. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1983.Google Scholar

Alger, John I. The Quest for Victory: The History of the Principles of War. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1982.Google Scholar

Allard, K. Somalia Operations: Lessons Learned. Washington, DC: NDU, 1995.Google Scholar

Anderson, Terry H. The Movement and the Sixties: Protest in America from Greensboro to Wounded Knee. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Angell, N. The Great Illusion. New York: Putnam’s, 1910.Google Scholar

Anon. “In the Shadow of Doom: Social Disintegration in America,” c. 1992.Google Scholar

Anon. “Text of Air Report by Morrow Board,” New York Times, Dec. 3, 1925.Google Scholar

Apt, Benjamin L. “Mahan’s Forebears: The Debate over Maritime Strategy, 1868–1883,” Naval War College Review 50, 3 (Summer 1997): 86–111.Google Scholar

Armbruster, Frank E. et al. Can We Win in Vietnam? The American Dilemma. London: Pall Mall, 1968.Google Scholar

Armstrong, B. J., ed. 21st Century Mahan: Sound Military Conclusions for the Modern Era. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Averyt, William F. Ens. USNR, “The Philosophy of the Counterculture,” Naval War College Review 23, 7 (Mar. 1971): 17–25.Google Scholar

Ayson, Robert. Thomas Schelling and the Nuclear Age: Strategy as Social Science. New York: Frank Cass, 2004.Google Scholar

Bacevich, Andrew J. The Pentomic Era: The US Army between Korea and Vietnam. Washington, DC: NDU, 1986.Google Scholar

Backus, Paul. “Finite Deterrence, Controlled Escalation,” Proceedings 85, 3 (Mar. 1959): 23–29.Google Scholar

Barlow, Jeffery G. The Revolt of the Admirals: The Fight for Naval Aviation, 1945–1950. Washington, DC: Potomac, 2001.Google Scholar

Barnes, Joseph. “The Great Bolshevik Cleansing,” Foreign Affairs 17, 3 (Apr. 1939): 556–68.Google Scholar

Barnhill, John H. “Watts Riots (1965),” in Revolts, Protests, Demonstrations, and Rebellions in American History, ed. Danver, Steven L., vol. 3. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2011.Google Scholar

Bassford, Christopher. Clausewitz in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, E[rwin]. “Game Theory: Lecture, 12 Dec. 1960,” Naval War College Review 13, 9 (May 1961): 16–41.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, E[rwin]. “Strategic War Gaming: Lecture, 16 Feb. 1961,” Naval War College Review 13, 10 (June 1961): 1–22.Google Scholar

Beard, George M. American Nervousness: Its Causes and Cures. New York: Putnam’s, 1881.Google Scholar

Beebe, Robert P., Capt. USN. “Military Decision from the Viewpoint of Game Theory,” Naval War College Review 10, 2 (Oct. 1957): 27–56.Google Scholar

Berg, A. Scott Lindberg. New York: Penguin, 1999.Google Scholar

Berinsky, Adam J. In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, Richard. China 1945: Mao’s Revolution and America’s Fateful Choice. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2014.Google Scholar

Betts, Richard. “Conventional Strategy: New Critics, Old Choices,” International Security 7, 4 (Spring 1983): 140–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Betts, Richard “Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis? Reply to Luttwak,” International Security 8, 2 (Fall 1983): 180–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Betts, Richard “Is Strategy an Illusion?,” International Security 25, 2 (Fall 2000): 5–50.Google Scholar

Biddle, Tami Davis. Rhetoric and Reality in Air Warfare: The Evolution of British and American Ideas about Strategic Bombing, 1914–1945. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Bigelow, John. The Principles of Strategy: Illustrated Mainly from American Campaigns, 2nd ed. New York: J. B. Lippincott, 1894.Google Scholar

Bishop, Robert L. “Review of The Strategy of Conflict by Thomas C. Schelling,” American Economic Review 51, 4 (Sept. 1961): 674–76.Google Scholar

Black, Jeremy. Air Power: A Global History. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016.Google Scholar

Bloom, J. Arthur. “William Lind’s Way of War: Meet the Field Marshal of Military Reform and Cultural Conservatism,” The American Conservative (Nov./Dec. 2016): 6–9.Google Scholar

Blum, John M., ed. The Price of Vision: The Diary of Henry A. Wallace. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1973.Google Scholar

Bond, Brian and Roy, Ian, eds. War and Society, 2 vols. New York: Holmes & Meier, 1975–77.Google Scholar

Boorman, S. A. “The Legacy of Henry Eccles,” Naval War College Review 62, 2 (Spring 2009): 91–116.Google Scholar

Boot, Max. The Road Not Taken: Edward Lansdale and the Tragedy in Vietnam. New York: Liveright, 2018.Google Scholar

Booth, Ken. “Bernard Brodie,” in Makers of Nuclear Strategy, ed. Baylis, John and Garnett, John. London: Pinters, 1991.Google Scholar

Booth, Ken. “The Evolution of Strategic Thinking,” in Contemporary Strategy I: Theories and Concepts, 2nd ed. New York: Holmes & Meier, 1987, 44–60.Google Scholar

Bostorff, Denise M. Proclaiming the Truman Doctrine: The Cold War Call to Arms. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Bowers, E. L. Is It Safe to Work? A Study of Industrial Accidents. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1930.Google Scholar

Bowie, Robert R. and Immerman, Richard H.. Waging Peace: How Eisenhower Shaped an Enduring Cold War Strategy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Branch, Taylor. Parting the Waters: America in the King Years, 1954–63. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1988.Google Scholar

Brands, H. W. American Dreams: The United States since 1945. New York: Penguin, 2010.Google Scholar

Brewer, Susan A. Why America Fights: Patriotism and Propaganda from the Philippines to Iraq. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brodie, B. Sea Power in the Machine Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1941.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. A Layman’s Guide to Naval Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1942 & 1944.Google Scholar

Brodie, B., ed. The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1946.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “Impact of New Weapons on War,” National War College Lecture, Sept. 4, 1946.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “The Atomic Bomb as a Weapon,” National War College Lecture, Sept. 6, 1946.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “Sea Power in the Atomic Age,” Naval War College Lecture, Jan. 19, 1949, Cat. No. 6890-7770.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “A-Bombs and Air Strategy,” Air War College Lecture, March 24, 1949. Air University Library, Maxwell AFB; M-33506-C.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “The Problem of Integrating the Factors of National Strategy,” Air War College Lecture, March 17, 1950. Air University Library, Maxwell AFB; M-33507-C.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “Air Power in an Overall Strategy,” Air War College Lecture, May 23, 1951. Air University Library, Maxwell AFB; K239.716250-12(R).Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “Changing Capabilities and War Objectives,” Air War College Lecture, April 17, 1952. Air University Library, Maxwell AFB; K239.716251-26; and K239.716252-105.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “Characteristics of a Sound Strategy,” Naval War College Review 4, 10 (June 1952): 65–82.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “The Heritage of Douhet,” Air University Quarterly Review 6, 2 (1953): 64–69.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “Nuclear Weapons: Strategic or Tactical?” Foreign Affairs 32, 2 (Jan. 1954): 217–29.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. Possible U.S. Military Strategies, Lecture Delivered at the US Army War College, March 30, 1954, published as RAND P-524, Santa Monica, CA, April 7, 1954.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “Unlimited Weapons and Limited War,” The Reporter 11 (Nov. 18, 1954): 16–21.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “Strategy Hits a Dead End,” Harper’s Magazine (May 1955): 33–37.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. Nuclear Weapons and Changing Strategic Outlooks, RAND P-811, Santa Monica, CA, Feb. 27, 1956.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. On the Worth of Principles of War, Lecture Delivered at the Command and General Staff College, Ft. Leavenworth, KS, on March 7, 1957, published as RAND P-1092, Santa Monica, CA, May 21, 1957.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “Review: More About Limited War,” World Politics 10, 1 (1957): 119.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. The Meaning of Limited War, July 30, 1958, published as RAND PM-2224, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “Strategy as an Art and a Science, Delivered at the Naval War College on 18 September 1958,” Naval War College Review 11, 6 (Feb. 1959): 1–20.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. Strategy in the Missile Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brodie, B. Escalation and the Nuclear Option. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. “Why Were We So (Strategically) Wrong?,” Foreign Policy 4 (Autumn 1971): 151–62.Google Scholar

Brodie, B. War and Politics. New York: Macmillan, 1973.Google Scholar

Brooks, Jennifer E. Defining the Peace: World War II Veterans, Race, and the Remaking of Southern Political Tradition. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Maj.Brown, I. T. “The ‘Grand Ideal’: John Boyd and America’s Strategic Vision,” Marine Corps Gazette 100, 2 (Feb. 2016): 55–58.Google Scholar

Brown, I. T. A New Conception of War: John Boyd, the US Marines, and Maneuver Warfare. Quantico, VA: USMC, 2018.Google Scholar

Brown, Seyom. Faces of Power: Constancy and Change in United States Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Bruce-Briggs, B. Supergenius: The Mega-Worlds of Herman Kahn. New York: North American Policy, 2000.Google Scholar

Bruno, Harry. Wings over America: The Story of American Aviation. New York: Halcyon, 1944.Google Scholar

Budiansky, Stephen. Air Power. New York: Viking, 2004.Google Scholar

Burlingame, Roger. General Billy Mitchell: Champion of Air Defense. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1952.Google Scholar

Burr, William, ed. “How Much Is Enough?: The US Navy and ‘Finite’ Deterrence,” May 1, 2009; https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu//nukevault/ebb275/index.htmGoogle Scholar

Butler, S. “America’s Armed Forces,” Common Sense 4, 11 (1935): pt. 2.Google Scholar

Butler, S. East to the Dawn: The Life of Amelia Earhart. Cambridge: De Capo, 1997.Google Scholar

Calhoun, Frederick S. Uses of Force and Wilsonian Foreign Policy. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Califano, Joseph A. Jr. The Triumph & Tragedy of Lyndon Johnson: The White House Years. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1991.Google Scholar

Campbell, W. Joseph. Yellow Journalism: Puncturing the Myths, Defining the Legacies. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003.Google Scholar

Cantril, Hadley and Strunck, Mildred, eds. Public Opinion, 1935–1946. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Carafano, J. J. The Army Reserves and the Abrams Doctrine: Unfulfilled Promise, Uncertain Future. Washington, DC: Heritage, 2005.Google Scholar

Carnagey, Dale. Public Speaking and Influencing Men of Business. n.p., 1913.Google Scholar

Caro, Robert A. The Passage of Power: The Years of Lyndon Johnson, vol. 4. New York: Vintage, 2013.Google Scholar

Carter, E. D. “Review of The Strategy of Conflict by Thomas C. Schelling,” International Affairs 38, 2 (Apr. 1962): 234.Google Scholar

Castel, Albert. “Liddell Hart’s Sherman: Propaganda as History,” Journal of Military History 67, 2 (Apr. 2003): 405–26.Google Scholar

Chafe, William. The Paradox of Change: American Women in the 20th Century. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Chalmers, David M. Hooded Americanism: The History of the Ku Klux Klan. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Cherpak, Evelyn M. Interview of Rear Admiral Joseph C. Wylie, USN (Ret.) Oral History Program, Naval War College, Newport, RI, 4 Parts; Part 1, Nov. 21, 1985.Google Scholar

Cherpak, Evelyn M. Register of the Papers of Henry E. Eccles, Series No. 6, 2nd Ed., Naval War College, Newport, RI, 1988.Google Scholar

Cherpak, Evelyn M. Register of the Papers of Herbert Rosinski, Series No. 17, Naval War College, Newport, RI, 1988, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar

Clark, W. Waging Modern War: Bosnia, Kosovo, and the Future of Combat. New York: PublicAffairs, 2001.Google Scholar

Clodfelter, James. “Vacillation and Stability in American Public Opinion toward Military and Foreign Policy,” Naval War College Review 23, 6 (Feb. 1971): 55–61.Google Scholar

Clodfelter, Mark A. “Molding Airpower Convictions: Development and Legacy of William Mitchell’s Strategic Thought,” in Meilinger, , ed. Paths of Heaven, 79–114.Google Scholar

Coen, R. M. “Labor Force Unemployment in the 1920s and 1930s: A Re-examination Based on Postwar Experience,” Review of Economics and Statistics 55 (1973): 46–55.Google Scholar

Cohen, Eliot. “Review of On Strategy,” Commentary 74, 1 (July 1982): 84–86.Google Scholar

Colomb, P. H. Naval Warfare: Its Ruling Principles Historically Treated. London: W. H. Allen, 1891.Google Scholar

Converse, Elliott V. III History of Acquisition in the Department of Defense, vol. 1, Rearming for the Cold War, 1945–1960. Washington, DC: Historical Office, OSD, 2012.Google Scholar

Cooke, James J. Billy Mitchell. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002.Google Scholar

Coolidge, Calvin. “Address to Newspaper Editors”; www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-the-american-society-newspaper-editors-washington-dcGoogle Scholar

Coolidge, Calvin. Address to American Society of Newspaper Editors, Jan. 17, 1925; www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-the-american-society-newspaper-editors-washington-dcGoogle Scholar

Cooper, John M. Jr. Pivotal Decades: The United States, 1900–1920. New York: W. W. Norton, 1990.Google Scholar

Coram, R. Boyd: The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War. New York: Little, Brown, 2002.Google Scholar

Corbett, Julian S. Some Principles of Maritime Strategy. London: Longman, Green, 1911.Google Scholar

Correll, John T. “The Reformers,” Air Force Magazine 91 (Feb. 2008): 40–44.Google Scholar

Corum, James S. “The Luftwaffe and Lessons Learned in the Spanish Civil War,” in Air Power History: Turning Points from Kitty Hawk to Kosovo, ed. Cox, S. and Gray, P.. London: Frank Cass, 2002, 66–89.Google Scholar

Cott, Nancy. The Grounding of Modern Feminism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Coult, Allan D. “Review of The Strategy of Conflict by Thomas C. Schelling,” American Anthropologist 64, 3, Part 1 (June 1962): 686–87.Google Scholar

Craig, Campbell and Radchenko, Sergey. “MAD, not Marx: Khrushchev and the Nuclear Revolution,” Journal of Strategic Studies 41, 1–2 (Feb. 2018): 208–33.Google Scholar

Craig, Gordon. The Politics of the Prussian Army. New York: Oxford University Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Crowl, Philip A. “Alfred Thayer Mahan: The Naval Historian,” in Makers of Modern Strategy, ed. Paret, Peter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1986.Google Scholar

Curtis, T. H., Col. USAF, “USAF Officer Education in Counterinsurgency,” Air University Review 18, 2 (Jan.–Feb. 1967): 67–69.Google Scholar

Cushman, John H., LTG, US Army (Ret.). Oral History, 6 vols., vol. 2, 1951–63.Google Scholar

Daddis, Gregory A. No Sure Victory: Measuring US Army Effectiveness and Progress in the Vietnam War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Daddis, Gregory A. Westmoreland’s War: Reassessing American Strategy in Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Dalleck, Robert. An Unfinished Life: John F. Kennedy, 1917–1963. New York: Little & Brown, 2004.Google Scholar

Dalleck, Robert. Harry S. Truman. New York: Times Books, 2008.Google Scholar

Daniels, Roger. “Immigration to the United States in the Twentieth Century,” in Cambridge Companion to Modern American Culture, ed. Bigsby, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, 73–954.Google Scholar

Dastrup, Boyd L. The US Army Command and General Staff College: A Centennial History. Manhattan, KS: Sun Flower, 1982.Google Scholar

Davis, Paul K. and Arquilla, John. Deterring or Coercing Opponents in Crisis: Lessons from the War with Saddam Hussein. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1991.Google Scholar

De Jomini, Baron. Summary of the Art of War, trans. Winship, O. F. and McClean, E. E.. New York: Putnam, 1854.Google Scholar

Department of the Army Historical Summary: FY 1979. Washington, DC: CMH, 1982.Google Scholar

Dept. Army. FM 100-5. Operations. Washington, DC: GPO, 1954.Google Scholar

Dept. Army. FM 100-5. Operations. Washington, DC: GPO, 1962.Google Scholar

Dept. Defense. Joint Publication 3-07: Joint Doctrine for Operations Other Than War. Washington, DC: GPO, 1995.Google Scholar

De Seversky, Alexander P. Victory Through Air Power. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1942.Google Scholar

De Seversky, Alexander P. “A Lecture on Air Power, Part I,” Air University Quarterly Review 1, 2 (Fall 1947): 25–40.Google Scholar

De Seversky, Alexander P. “A Lecture on Air Power, Part II,” Air University Quarterly Review 1, 3 (Fall 1947): 26–41.Google Scholar

De Seversky, Alexander P. Air Power: Key to Survival. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1950.Google Scholar

De Seversky, Alexander P. “I Remember Billy Mitchell,” Air Power Historian (Oct. 1956): 179.Google Scholar

Devine, Robert A. Eisenhower and the Cold War. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Dickman, Joseph L., LTC USAF. “Douhet and the Future,” Air University Quarterly Review 2, 1 (1948): 3–15.Google Scholar

Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, JCS Pub 1. Washington, DC: GPO, 1979.Google Scholar

Dodge, Robert. The Strategist: The Life and Times of Thomas Schelling. Hollis, NH: Hollis Publ., 2006.Google Scholar

Doughty, Robert A. The Evolution of US Army Tactical Doctrine, 1946–1976. Ft. Leavenworth, KS: CSI, 1979.Google Scholar

Downey, E. H. History of Work Accident Indemnity in Iowa (Iowa City: State Historical Society, 1912.Google Scholar

Drew, S. Nelson, ed. NSC-68: Forging the Strategy of Containment with analyses by Paul H. Nitze. Washington, DC: National Defense University, 1996.Google Scholar

Dubofsky, Melvin and McCartin, Joseph A., American Labor: A History, 9th ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2017.Google Scholar

Dudley, William S. “Alfred Thayer Mahan on the War of 1812,” The Influence of History on Mahan, ed. Hattendorf, John B.. Newport, RI: Naval War College, 1991, 141–54.Google Scholar

Duiker, William J. Ho Chi Minh. New York: Hyperion, 2000.Google Scholar

Eastman, Lloyd E. Seeds of Destruction: Nationalist China in War and Revolution, 1937–1949. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Eccles, H. E. “Pacific Logistics.” Paper presented at the Naval War College, March 30, 1946.Google Scholar

Eccles, H. E. “Basic Elements and Aspects of Logistics.” Lecture delivered at the Naval War College, Aug. 27, 1947.Google Scholar

Eccles, H. E. Operational Naval Logistics. Washington, DC: Bureau of Naval Personnel, 1950.Google Scholar

Eccles, H. E. “Logistics and Strategy: Lecture, 2 Jan. 1962,” Naval War College Review 14, 6 (Mar. 1962): 15–30.Google Scholar

Eccles, H. E. “Military Theory and Education: A Working Paper,” Nov. 1, 1962.Google Scholar

Eccles, H. E. “Military Theory and Education: The Need for and Nature of,” Naval War College Review 21, 6 (Feb. 1965): 70–79.Google Scholar

Eccles, H. E. Logistics in the National Defense. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole, 1959.Google Scholar

Eccles, H. E. Military Concepts and Philosophy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Eccles, H. E. “Suez 1956 – Some Military Lessons,” Naval War College Review 21, 7 (Mar. 1969): 28–55.Google Scholar

Eccles, H. E. “Strategy: The Essence of Professionalism,” Naval War College Review 24, 4 (Dec. 1971): 43–51.Google Scholar

Eccles, H.E. Military Power in a Free Society. Newport, RI: Naval War College, 1979.Google Scholar

Eccles, H. E. “Strategy – The Theory and Application,” Naval War College Review 32, 3 (May–June 1979), 18–19, American Political Science Association Conference, 1978.Google Scholar

Eccles, H. E. “The Dangers of ‘Weapons Strategy,” Christian Science Monitor, Oct. 1, 1981.Google Scholar

Electronic interview with Col. R. M. Swain, US Army (Ret.), May 2018.Google Scholar

Ellsberg, Daniel. Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner. New York: Bloomsbury, 2017.Google Scholar

Enthoven, Alain C. and Smith, K. Wayne. How Much Is Enough, Shaping the Defense Program 1961–1969. New York: Harper & Row, 1979.Google Scholar

Evans, S. M. Tidal Wave: How Women Changed America at Century’s End. New York: Free Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Niall. Kissinger 1923–1968: The Idealist. New York: Penguin, 2015.Google Scholar

Fiebeger, G. J., Col. Elements of Strategy. West Point, NY: US Military Academy, 1917.Google Scholar

Fiske, B. “Our Naval Profession,” Naval Institute Proceedings (June 1907): 475–78.Google Scholar

Fiske, Bradley A. The Navy as a Fighting Machine. New York: Scribner’s, 1916.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, F. S. The Great Gatsby. New York: Scribner’s, 1925.Google Scholar

Flynn, George Q. The Draft, 1940–1973. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1993.Google Scholar

Foner, Philip S. Mark Twain as Social Critic. New York: International Publishers, 1981.Google Scholar

Frederickson, Kari. The Dixiecrat Revolt and the End of the Solid South, 1932–1968. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Free, Lloyd A. “Political Beliefs and Public Opinion,” Naval War College Review 23, 7 (Mar. 1971): 4–16.Google Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence, ed. Strategic Coercion: Concepts and Cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence. Kennedy’s Wars: Berlin, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence. The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy, 3rd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence. Deterrence. Cambridge: Polity, 2004.Google Scholar

Futrell, R. F. Ideas, Concepts, Doctrine: Basic Thinking in the United States Air Force, vol. 1. Maxwell AFB: Air University, 1989.Google Scholar

Gabriel, R. and Savage, P., Crisis in Command: Mismanagement in the Army. New York: Hill & Wang, 1978.Google Scholar

Gaddis, John Lewis. George F. Kennan: An American Life. New York: Penguin, 2012.Google Scholar

Gamrami-Tabrizi, Sharon. “Simulating the Unthinkable: Gaming War in the 1950s and 1960s,” Social Studies of Science 30, 2 (Apr. 2000): 163–223.Google Scholar

Gamrami-Tabrizi, Sharon. The Worlds of Herman Kahn: The Intuitive Science of Thermonuclear War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Gardner, John S., ed. The Company Town: Architecture and Society in the Early Industrial Age. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Garfinkle, Adam. Telltale Hearts: The Origins and Impact of the Vietnam Antiwar Movement. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Gauvreau, Emile and Cohen, Lester. Billy Mitchell: Founder of Our Air Force and Prophet without Honor. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1942.Google Scholar

Geissler, Suzanne. God and Sea Power: The Influence of Religion on Alfred Thayer Mahan. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Gentile, Gian. “The Chimera of Success: Pacification and the End of the Vietnam War,” in War Termination, ed. Moten, Matthew. Leavenworth, KS: CSI, 2011, 225–35.Google Scholar

George, Henry. Progress and Property. New York: D. Appleton, 1879.Google Scholar

Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Giddings, Franklin H. Principles of Sociology. New York: Macmillan, 1896.Google Scholar

Gilbert, James. A Cycle of Outrage: America’s Reaction to the Juvenile Delinquent in the 1950s. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Gilje, Paul. Rioting in America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Glazer, Herbert. “Limited War Gaming: Lecture, 19 Jan. 1965,” Naval War College Review 17, 7 (Mar. 1965): 29–44.Google Scholar

Glenn, Russell W. “No More Principles of War?,” Parameters 28, 1 (Spring 1998): 48–66.Google Scholar

Glueck, Eleanor T. “Wartime Delinquency,” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 33, 2 (1942–43): 119–35.Google Scholar

Glueck, Eleanor T. and Glueck, Sheldon. Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Gödel, Kurt. “On Formally Undecidable Propositions of the Principia Mathematica and Related Systems,” in The Undecidable. Hewlett, NY: Raven, 1965.Google Scholar

Goldin, Claudia. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Doris Kearns. Lyndon Johnson and the American Dream. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Gordon, Robert J. The Rise and Fall American Growth: The US Standard of Living since the Civil War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S. “What RAND Hath Wrought,” Foreign Policy 4 (Autumn 1971): 111–29.Google Scholar

Greenspan, Alan and Wooldridge, Adrian. Capitalism in America: A History. New York: Penguin, 2018.Google Scholar

Greenwood, Sean. “Frank Roberts and the ‘Other’ Long Telegram: The View from the British Embassy in Moscow, March 1946,” Journal of Contemporary History 25 (1990): 103–22.Google Scholar

Griffin, John Howard. Black Like Me. New York: Signet, 1962.Google Scholar

Grob, G. N. The Deadly Truth: A History of Disease in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Haarr, G. H. German Invasion of Norway 1940. Barnsley: Seaforth, 2009.Google Scholar

Hacker, Barton C. Elements of Controversy: The Atomic Energy Commission and Radiation Safety in Nuclear Weapons Testing, 1947–1974. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hahn, Peter L. “Securing the Middle East: The Eisenhower Doctrine of 1957,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 36, 1 (2006): 38–47.Google Scholar

Halleck, H. Wager. Elements of Military Art and Science. New York: D. Appleton, 1846.Google Scholar

Halperin, Morton H. Limited War: An Annotated Bibliography. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Halperin, Morton H. Limited War in the Nuclear Age. New York: John Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar

Hämäläinen, Pekka. The Comanche Empire. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Hammes, T. X. The Sling and the Stone: On War in the 21st Century. St. Paul, MN: Zenith, 2004.Google Scholar

Hammond, Grant T. The Mind of War: John Boyd and American Security. Washington, DC: Smithsonian, 2001.Google Scholar

Hampton, Isaac. II The Black Officer Corps: A History of Black Military Advancements from Integration through Vietnam. New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Handel, Michael. “Clausewitz in the Age of Technology,” in Clausewitz and Modern Strategy, ed. Handel, Michael. Totowa, NJ: Frank Cass, 1986, 58–62.Google Scholar

Hansen, Gladys and Condon, Emmet. Denial of Disaster. San Francisco, CA: Cameron, 1989.Google Scholar

Harkin, W. J. “Maneuver Warfare in the 21st Century,” Marine Corps Gazette 92, 2 (Feb. 2011): 19–25.Google Scholar

Harrison, A. Black Exodus: The Great Migration from the American South. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hasik, James. “Beyond the Briefing: Theoretical and Practical Problems in the Works and Legacy of John Boyd,” Contemporary Security Policy 34, 3 (2013): 583–99.Google Scholar

Hattendorf, J. B. and Hattendorf, L. C., eds. A Bibliography of the Works of Alfred Thayer Mahan. Newport, RI: Naval War College, 1986.Google Scholar

Hattendorff, J. B., ed. The Influence of History on Mahan: The Proceedings of a Conference Marking the Centenary of Alfred Thayer Mahan’s Influence of Sea Power upon History 1660–1783. Newport, RI: Naval War College, 1991.Google Scholar

Hattendorf, John B.“The Idea of a ‘Fleet in Being’ in Historical Perspective,” Naval War College Review 67, 1 (Winter 2014): 43–60.Google Scholar

Hattendorf, John B., Simpson, B. Mitchell III, and Wadleigh, John R.. Sailors and Scholars: The Centennial History of the US Naval War College. Newport, RI: Naval War College, 1984.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, Werner. Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper, 1962.Google Scholar

Heller, Charles E. and Stofft, William A., eds. America’s First Battles, 1776–1965. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1986.Google Scholar

Hermes, Walter. Truce Tent and Fighting Front. Washington, DC: CMH, 1992.Google Scholar

Herring, George. LBJ and Vietnam: A Different Kind of War. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hollis, Christopher. “Dr. Strangelove and Dr. Kahn,” The Spectator 28, 1964: 11.Google Scholar

Hooker, R. D., ed. Maneuver Warfare: An Anthology. Novato, CA: Presidio, 1993.Google Scholar

Hosmer, Stephen T. The Conflict over Kosovo: Why Milosevic Decided to Settle When He Did. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Project Air Force, 2001.Google Scholar

House, Jonathan M. A Military History of the Cold War, 1944–1962. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Howard, Michael, ed. Soldiers and Governments: Nine Studies in Civil-Military Relations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Howard, Michael War and the Liberal Conscience. London: Maurice Temple Smith, 1978.Google Scholar

Hoxie, Frederick E. A Final Promise: The Campaign to Assimilate the Indian, 1880–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Hughes, Wayne P. “Mahan, Tactics and Principles of Strategy,” in The Influence of History on Mahan: The Proceedings of a Conference, Marking the Centenary of Alfred Thayer Mahan’s The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660–1783, ed. Hattendorf, John B.. Newport, RI: Naval War College Press, 1991, 25–36.Google Scholar

Hughes, Wayne P. Jr., Capt. USN. “Naval Maneuver Warfare,” Naval War College Review 50, 3 (Summer 1997): 25–49.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel P. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Hurley, Alfred F. Billy Mitchell: Crusader for Air Power. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Huston, J. A. “The Theory and Principles of War, Lecture Delivered at the Naval War College on 26 August 1959,” Naval War College Review 12, 4 (Dec. 1959): 19–35.Google Scholar

James, D. Clayton and Wells, Anne Sharp. Refighting the Last War: Command and Crisis in Korea 1950–1953. New York: Free Press, 1993.Google Scholar

James, William. Principles of Psychology, 2 vols. New York: Henry Holt, 1890.Google Scholar

Jane, Fred T. Fighting Ships. London: Sampson Low, Marston, 1912.Google Scholar

Jane, Fred. T. Heresies of Sea Power. New York: Longman, Green, 1906.Google Scholar

Janowitz, M. The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait. New York: Free Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Jensen, Kenneth M., ed. Origins of the Cold War: The Novikov, Kennan, and Roberts “Long Telegrams” of 1946, rev. ed. Washington, DC: Washington Institute of Peace, 1995.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert. “Deterrence Theory Revisited,” World Politics 31 (1979): 289–324.Google Scholar

Joint State Government Commission, A Report of the Committee on Penal Code and Juvenile Delinquency. Harrisburg, PA, Apr. 20, 1945.Google Scholar

Jones, Archer. Elements of Military Strategy: An Historical Approach. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1996.Google Scholar

Kahn, H. On Thermonuclear War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UniversityPress, 1960.Google Scholar

Kahn, H.. Thinking about the Unthinkable. New York: Horizon, 1962.Google Scholar

Kahn, H. On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios. New York: Praeger, 1965.Google Scholar

Kahn, H. “If Negotiations Fail,” Foreign Affairs 46, 4 (July 1968): 627–41.Google Scholar

Kahn, H. and Mann, Irwin, Techniques of Systems Analysis, RAND Research Memorandum RM 1829-1, June 1957.Google Scholar

Kahn, H. and Mann, Irwin. Ten Common Pitfalls, RAND Research Memorandum RM 1937, July 17, 1957.Google Scholar

Kahn, H. and Mann, Irwin. Game Theory, P-1166, RAND Corporation, July 30, 1957.Google Scholar

Kahn, H. and Mann, Irwin, War Gaming, P-1167, RAND Corporation, July 30, 1957.Google Scholar

Kahn, H. and Wiener, Anthony, eds. American Values: Past and Future, vol. I, Values, Attitudes, and Life-Styles in a Changing World. Croton-on-Hudson, NY: Hudson Institute, Dec. 31, 1974.Google Scholar

Kahn, H. and Scalera, Garrett N.. “A Strategy for Vietnamization: A Discussion Paper,” Croton-on-Hudson, NY: Hudson Institute, Aug. 5, 1969.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Fred. Wizards of Armageddon. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1983.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Fred. “All Pain, No Gain,” Slate, Oct. 11, 2005.Google Scholar

Kennan, George] X, “The Sources of Soviet Conduct,” Foreign Affairs 25, 4 (July 1947): 566–82.Google Scholar

Kissinger, H. Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy. New York: Harper, 1957.Google Scholar

Kissinger, H.Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Shuster, 1994.Google Scholar

Kiszely, John. Anatomy of a Campaign: British Fiasco in Norway 1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Klein, H. S. A Population History of the United States, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Koistinen, Paul A. C. State of War: The Political Economy of American Warfare, 1945–2011. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2012.Google Scholar

Kozak, Warren. Curtis LeMay: Strategist and Tactician. Washington, DC: Regnery, 2014.Google Scholar

Kraus, Joe. “How the Melting Pot Stirred America: The Reception of Zangwill's Play and Theater’s Role in the American Assimilation Experience,” Melos 24, 3 (1999): 3–19.Google Scholar

Krause, M. D. and Phillips, R. C., eds. Historical Perspectives of the Operational Art. Washington, DC: CMH, 2005.Google Scholar

Krepinevich, Andrew F. Jr. The Army and Vietnam (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Kurlansky, Mark. 1968: The Year That Rocked the World. New York: Random House, 2005.Google Scholar

LaFeber, Walter. “A Note on the ‘Mercantilistic Imperialism’ of Alfred Thayer Mahan,” Mississippi River Valley Review 48 (Mar. 1962): 674–85.Google Scholar

LaFeber, Walter. “The Rise and Fall of Colin Powell and the Powell Doctrine,” Political Science Quarterly 124, 1 (Spring 2009): 71–93.Google Scholar

Lansdale, Edward G. Maj.-Gen. “Viet Nam: Do We Understand Revolution?,” Foreign Affairs 43, 1 (Oct. 1964): 75–86.Google Scholar

Laub, John H. and Smith, Jinney S.. “Eleanor Touroff Glueck: Unsung Pioneer in Criminology,” Women & Criminal Justice 6, 2 (1995): 1–22.Google Scholar

Laurie, Clayton D. “The United States Army and the Return to Normalcy in Labor Dispute Interventions: The Case of the West Virginia Coal Mine Wars, 1920–1921,” West Virginia History 50 (1991) 1–24.Google Scholar

Leary, Timothy. Turn On, Tune In, Drop Out. Oakland, CA: Ronin Publishing, 1965.Google Scholar

Leber, Theodore T. Jr., Lieut.-Cdr., USNR. “The Genesis of Antimilitarism on the College Campus: A Contemporary Case Study of Student Protest,” Naval War College Review 23, 3 (Nov. 1970): 48–99.Google Scholar

Lebergott, Stanley. The American Economy: Income, Wealth, and Want. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Leighton, Richard M. Strategy, Money, and the New Look, 1953–1956. Vol. III, History of Office of Secretary of Defense. Washington, DC: Historical Office, OSD, 2001.Google Scholar

Lemay, Benoit. Erich von Manstein: Hitler’s Master Strategist, trans. Hayward, Pierce. Philadelphia, PA: Casemate, 2010.Google Scholar

Leonard, R. The Art of Maneuver: Maneuver-Warfare Theory and AirLand Battle. Novato, CA: Presidio, 1991.Google Scholar

Leslie, Reo N. Jr. “Christianity and the Evangelist for Sea Power: The Religion of Alfred Thayer Mahan,” in Hattendorf, ed. Influence of History on Mahan, 127–39.Google Scholar

Levine, I. D. Mitchell: Pioneer of Air Power. New York: Duell, Sloane & Pierce, 1943.Google Scholar

Lewis, William J. The Warsaw Pact: Arms, Doctrine, and Strategy. New York: Macgraw Hill, 1983.Google Scholar

Libbey, James K. Alexander P. De Seversky and the Quest for Air Power. Washington, DC: Potomac, 2013.Google Scholar

Lind, W. and Thomas Hobbes. Victoria: A Novel of 4th Generation War. Kouvola, Finland: Castalia, 2014.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S. “Defining Maneuver Warfare for the Marine Corps,” Marine Corps Gazette (Mar. 1980): 56.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S. Maneuver Warfare Handbook. New York: Westview, 1985.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S. “Ready, Aim, Think,” The New Republic 192 (Mar. 4, 1985): 40.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S. “The Theory and Practice of Maneuver Warfare,” in Maneuver Warfare: An Anthology, ed. Hooker, R. D. Jr. Novato, CA: Presidio, 1993.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S. “Some Doctrinal Questions for the United States Army,” Military Review 77, 1 (Jan./Feb. 1997 <1977>): 135–43.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S. “Fourth-Generation Warfare’s First Blow: A Quick Look,” Marine Corps Gazette 85, 11 (Nov. 2001): 72.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S. “Understanding Fourth Generation War,” Military Review 84, 5 (Sept./Oct. 2004): 12–16.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S. “The Will Doesn’t Triumph,” in Global Insurgency and the Future of Armed Conflict: Debating Fourth-Generation Warfare, ed. Terriff, Terry, Karp, Aaron, and Karp, Regina. London: Routledge, 2008, 102–03.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S. “Alternate History: The Right Needs a Narrative to Refute the Superstitions of Progress,” The American Conservative (July 2011): 30–34.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S. “John Boyd’s Art of War: Why Our Greatest Military Theorist Only Made Colonel,” American Conservative (July/Aug. 2013): 9–10.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S. “The New Separatism,” The American Conservative (Jan./Feb. 2018), 14.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S. “The Scourge of Cultural Marxism,” The American Conservative (May/June 2018): 12.Google Scholar

Lind, W. and Hart, Gary. America Can Win: The Case for Military Reform. Bethesda, MD: Adler & Adler, 1986.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S. and Thiele, G. A.. 4th Generation Warfare Handbook. Kouvola, Finland: Castalia, 2015.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S., Nightengale, K., Schmitt, J. F., Sutton, J. W., and Wilson, G., “The Changing Face of War: Into the Fourth Generation,” Marine Corps Gazette (Oct. 1989): 22–26.Google Scholar

Lind, W. S. and Smith, Daniel. “Symposium: Q: Is Multiculturalism a Threat to the National Security of the United States?” Insight on the News, Dec. 31, 2001, pp. 40–43.Google Scholar

Lind, William S. and Marshner, W. H.. Cultural Conservatism: Toward a New National Agenda. Lanham, MD: Free Congress Foundation, 1987.Google Scholar

Linder, M. “Fatal Subtraction: Statistical MIAs on the Industrial Battlefield,” Journal of Legislation 20, 2 (1994): 99–145.Google Scholar

Lindner, Robert M. Rebel Without a Cause: The Story of a Criminal Psychopath. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1944.Google Scholar

Linn, Brian McAllister. The Echo of Battle: The Army’s Way of War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Linn, Brian MacAllister. Elvis’ Army: Cold War GIs and the Atomic Battlefield. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Lippmann, Walter. The Cold War: A Study in US Foreign Policy. New York: Harper, 1947.Google Scholar

Lippmann, Walter. “A Society Cannot Stand Still,” New York Herald Tribune, Oct. 10, 1957.Google Scholar

Lippmann, Walter. The Coming Tests with Russia. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1961.Google Scholar

Longley, Kyle. LBJ’s 1968: Power, Politics, and the Presidency in America’s Year of Upheaval. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Luce, S. B., Adm. “The Intellectual Focus: On the Study of Naval Warfare as a Science,” and “Address Delivered at the United States Naval War College June 2, 1903,” in The Writings of Stephen B. Luce, ed. Hayes, J. D. and Hattendorf, J. B.. Newport, RI: Naval War College, 1975.Google Scholar

Luce, Stephen B. “The Benefits of War,” North American Review (Dec. 1891): 672–73.Google Scholar

Luttwak, E. N. Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Luttwak, E. N.“The Operational Level of War,” International Security 5, 3 (Winter 1980–81): 61–79.Google Scholar

Luttwak, E. N. “Attrition, Relational Maneuver, and the Military Balance,” International Security 8, 2 (Fall 1983): 176–79.Google Scholar

Lykke, Arthur F. Jr., Col. “Defining Military Strategy = E + W + M,” Military Review 69, 5 (1989): 3.Google Scholar

MacIsaac, David. “Voices from the Central Blue: The Air Power Theorists,”in Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age, ed. Paret, Peter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986, 624–47.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660–1783. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1890.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “The United States Looking Outward,” The Atlantic Monthly 66 (Dec. 1890): 816–24.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T.The Influence of Sea Power Upon the French Revolution and Empire, 1793–1812. Boston: Little, Brown, 1892.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. Admiral Farragut. New York: D. Appleton, 1893.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “Hawaii and Our Future Sea Power,” The Forum 15 (Mar. 1893): 1–11.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “The Isthmus and Sea Power,” The Atlantic Monthly 72 (Oct. 1893): 459–72.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “The Future in Relation to American Naval Power,” Harper’s New Monthly 91 (Oct. 1895): 767–75.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. The Life of Nelson: The Embodiment of the Sea Power of Great Britain, 2 vols. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1897.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “Preparedness for Naval War,” Harper’s New Monthly 94 (Mar. 1897): 579–88.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “A Twentieth-Century Outlook,” Harper’s New Monthly (Sept. 1897): 521–33.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “Current Fallacies Upon Naval Subjects,” Harpers’ New Monthly 97 (June 1898): 42–53.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “The War on the Sea and Its Lessons. I. How the Motive of the War Gave Direction to Its Earlier Movements,” McClure’s Magazine (Dec. 1898): 114.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “Distinguishing Qualities of Ships of War,” Scripps-McRae Newspaper League, Nov. 1898, in Lessons of the War with Spain and Other Articles. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1899, 257–73.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “The War on the Sea and Its Lessons. II. The Effect of Deficient Coast Defense on the Movements of the Navy,” McClure’s Magazine (Jan. 1899): 232–36.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “The War on the Sea and Its Lessons. III. The Reasons for Blockading Cuba,” McClure’s Magazine (Feb. 1899): 358.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “The War on the Sea and Its Lessons IV. The Problems Presented to Our Navy by Cervera’s Appearance in West Indian Waters and How They Were Solved,” McClure’s Magazine (Mar. 1899): 479–80.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “Some Considerations of the Principles Involved in the Current War,” National Review 44 (Sept. 1904): 27–46.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. Sea Power in Its Relations to the War of 1812, 2 vols. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1905.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “Some Reflections Upon the Far-Eastern War,” National Review 47 (May 1906): 383–405.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. From Sail to Steam: Recollections of a Naval Life. New York: Harper, 1907.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “War from the Christian Standpoint,” Nov. 15, 1900, in Some Neglected Aspects of War. London: Sampson Low, Marston, 1907.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “The Moral Aspect of War,” North American Review (Oct. 1899) in Some Neglected Aspects of War. London: Sampson Low, Marston, 1907.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “The Practical Character of the United States Naval War College,” in Naval Administration and Warfare. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1908.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. The Harvest Within: Thoughts on the Life of the Christian. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1909.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. Naval Strategy Compared and Contrasted with the Principles and Practice of Military Operations on Land. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1911.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “The Place of Force in International Relations,” North American Review 195 (Jan. 1912): 28–39.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “Sea Power in the Present European War,” Leslie’s Illustrated Weekly CXIX (Aug. 20, 1914), in Letters and Papers of Mahan III, 706–10.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “Subordination in Historical Treatment,” in Naval Administration, and Warfare: Some General Principles. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1918.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. Letters and Papers of Alfred Thayer Mahan, 3 vols., ed. Seager, Robert II and Maguire, Doris D.. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Marolda, Edward J., ed. The US Navy in the Korean War. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute, 2013.Google Scholar

Marr, David G. “Review of On Strategy by Harry G. Summers,” Pacific Affairs 56, 3 (Autumn 1983): 594–95.Google Scholar

Marshall, Alfred. Principles of Economics, 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1890.Google Scholar

Martelle, Scott. Blood Passion: The Ludlow Massacre and Class War in the American West. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, 2007.Google Scholar

Mason, Ensign S. “John Boyd and Strategic Naval Air Power,” Proceedings 129, 7 (July 2003): 76.Google Scholar

Matheny, Michael R. Carrying the War to the Enemy: American Operational Art to 1945. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Matray, James I. “Dean Acheson’s Press Club Speech Reexamined,” Journal of Conflict Studies 21, 1 (Spring 2002): 28–55.Google Scholar

Mattson, Kevin. Upton Sinclair and the Other American Century. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2006.Google Scholar

Mauer, M. and Senning, C .F., “Billy Mitchell, the Air Service, and the Mingo County War,” West Virginia Historian 30 (Oct. 1968): 339–50.Google Scholar

May, Elaine T. Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era, 4th ed. New York: Basic Books, 2017.Google Scholar

May, Ernest R. and Zelikow, Philip D., eds. The Kennedy Tapes: Inside the White House during the Cuban Missile Crisis. New York: W. W. Norton, 2002.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Sen. Joseph. Speech, Congressional Record, Senate, 81st Congress, 2nd Session, entered into the record February 20, 1950. Washington, DC: US Congress, 1957.Google Scholar

McClintock, Robert. The Meaning of Limited War: The Diplomacy of Force and the Force of Diplomacy under Pax Ballistica. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1967.Google Scholar

McCuen, John J., Lt. Col. The Art of Counter-Revolutionary War: The Strategy of Counter-Insurgency. London: Farber, 1966.Google Scholar

McCullough, David C. Truman. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1993.Google Scholar

McDermott, W. B. “Thinking about Herman Kahn,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 15, 1 (Mar. 1971): 55–70.Google Scholar

McFate, Montgomery. Military Anthropology: Soldiers, Scholars and Subjects at the Margins of Empire. London: Hurst, 2018.Google Scholar

McGinnis, Anthony R. “When Courage Was Not Enough: Plains Indians at War with the United States Army,” Journal of Military History 76 (Apr. 2012): 455–73.Google Scholar

McGirr, Lisa. The War on Alcohol: Prohibition and the Rise of the American State. New York: W. W. Norton, 2015.Google Scholar

McIntosh, Scott E. “The Wingman-Philosopher of MiG Alley: John Boyd and the OODA Loop,” Air Power History (Winter 2011): 24–33.Google Scholar

McIvor, Anthony D., ed. Rethinking the Principles of War. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute, 2005.Google Scholar

McKercher, B. J. C. and Hennessy, M. A., eds. The Operational Art: Developments in the Theories of War. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1996.Google Scholar

McMaster, H. R. Dereliction of Duty: Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, the Joint Chiefs, and the Lies that Led to Vietnam. New York: HarperCollins, 1997.Google Scholar

McNamara, R. S. In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam. New York: Random House, 1995.Google Scholar

Mears, Dwight S. The Medal of Honor: The Evolution of America’s Highest Decoration. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2018.Google Scholar

Meilinger, Phillip S., ed. The Paths of Heaven: The Evolution of Air Power Theory. Maxwell AFB, AL: Air University, 1997.Google Scholar

Meilinger, Phillip S.“Alexander P. De Seversky,” Aerospace Power Journal 16, 4 (2002): 8–15.Google Scholar

Mercur, James. Elements of the Art of War, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley, 1889.Google Scholar

Messer, C. M., Shriver, T. E., and Adams, Alison E.. “The Destruction of Black Wall Street: Tulsa’s 1921 Riot and the Eradication of Accumulated Wealth,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 77 (Oct. 2018): 789–819.Google Scholar

Milevski, L. “Revisiting J. C. Wiley’s Dichotomy of Strategy: The Effects of Sequential and Cumulative Patterns of Operations,” Journal of Strategic Studies 35, 2 (2012): 223–42.Google Scholar

Millen, Raymond. “Eisenhower and US Grand Strategy,” Parameters 44, 2 (Summer 2014): 35–48.Google Scholar

Millett, Kate. Sexual Politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1970.Google Scholar

Millis, Walter. “Review of Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy by Henry A. Kissinger,” Political Science Quarterly 72, 4 (Dec. 1957): 608.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. “Building the Alaskan Telegraph System,” National Geographic Magazine (1903): 357–61.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. Field Signal Communications, 2nd Lecture. Ft. Leavenworth, KS: Dept. of Military Art, 1905.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. “Our Faulty Military Policy,” 1915, Box 45, Mitchell Papers, Library of Congress.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. “Air Service at St. Mihiel,” World’s Work 38 (Aug. 1919): 360–70.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. “Air Service at the Argonne-Meuse,” World’s Work 38 (Sept. 1919): 552–60.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. “Air Power vs. Sea Power,” American Review of Reviews 58 (Mar. 21, 1921): 273–77.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. “America in the Air: The Future of Airplane and Airship, Economically and as Factors in National Defense,” National Geographic 39, 3 (Mar. 1921): 339–52.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. “Has the Airplane Made the Battleship Obsolete?,” World’s Work (Apr. 1921): 552.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. “Aviation over the Water,” American Review of Reviews 62 (Oct. 1921): 391–98.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. “General Mitchell’s Lecture to Army War College,” dated Wed. Nov. 22, 1922, pp. 21–24.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. Winged Defense: The Development and Possibilities of Modern Air Power – Economic and Military. New York: G. P. Putnam’s, 1925.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. “Some Considerations Regarding a Limitation of Armaments,” Annals of the American Academy of Political Social Sciences 120 (1925): 87–89.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. “Airplanes in National Defense,” Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science 131 (May 1927): 38–42.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. “The Next War in the Air,” Popular Mechanics 63 (Feb. 1935): 135–65.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. et al. Report of Inspection Trip to France, Germany, Holland, and England Made During the Winter of 1921–1922. Washington, DC: GPO, 1923.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. et al. Report of Inspection of United States Possessions in the Pacific and Java, Singapore, India, Siam, China, and Japan. Washington, DC: GPO, Oct. 24, 1924.Google Scholar

Moise, Edwin E. The Myths of Tet: The Most Misunderstood Event of the Vietnam War. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2017.Google Scholar

Moore, John L., ed. U.S. Defense Policy: Weapons, Strategy and Commitments, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1980.Google Scholar

Morgan, Forrest E. et al. Dangerous Thresholds: Managing Escalation in the Twenty-First Century. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2008.Google Scholar

Morgan, M. S., and Batson, Fugler C.. “Maneuver and the Information Battlespace,” Marine Corps Gazette 94, 4 (Apr. 2010): 14–16.Google Scholar

Morgan, Patrick. Deterrence Now. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J. “Review of Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy by Henry A. Kissinger,” American Political Science Review 52, 3 (Sept. 1958): 842–44.Google Scholar

Myerson, Roger B. “Learning from Schelling’s Strategy of Conflict,” Journal of Economic Literature 47, 4 (Dec. 2009): 1109–25.Google Scholar

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Thirty Years of Lynching in the United States. New York: Lawbook Exchange, 2010 reprint.Google Scholar

National Security Council Report. Basic National Security Policy (NSC 162/2), Oct. 30, 1953; http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1952-54v02p1/d100Google Scholar

Nelson, G. R. “The Supply and Quality of First-Term Enlistees Under the All-Volunteer Force,” in The All-Volunteer Force After a Decade, ed. Bowman, William et al. Washington, DC: Brassey’s, 1986.Google Scholar

Nguyen, Lien-Hang T. Hanoi’s War: An International History of the War for Peace in Vietnam. Charlotte: University of North Carolina Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Nichols, David A. Eisenhower 1956: The President’s Year of Crisis – Suez and the Brink of War. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2011.Google Scholar

Nicolosi, Anthony. Interview of Rear Admiral Henry E. Eccles, USN (Ret.) Oral History Program, Naval War College, Newport, RI, Part 2, Jan. 13, 1977, p. 3.Google Scholar

Nitze, Paul. Record of the State-Defense Policy Group Meeting, March 10, 1950, Foreign Relations of the United States, vol. 1. Washington, DC: GPO, 1977.Google Scholar

Norman, Albert. “Review of Robert E. Osgood, Limited War: The Challenge to American Strategy,” Political Science Quarterly 73, 2 (June 1958): 283.Google Scholar

Norman, Lloyd and Spore, John B.. “Big Push in Guerrilla Warfare,” Army (Mar. 1962): 34.Google Scholar

NSC 124/2, United States Objectives and Courses of Action with Respect to Southeast Asia, Washington, DC; June 25, 1952; General Considerations, Para. A.Google Scholar

O’Brien, K. “Logistics Pioneer: Rear Admiral Henry E. Eccles,” Air Force Journal of Logistics 34, 1–2 (2010): 74–77.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Phillips P. How the War Was Won: Air-Sea Power and Allied Victory in World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, Lawrence. Playing with Fire: The 1968 Election and the Transformation of American Politics. New York: Penguin, 2017.Google Scholar

O’Neill, W. L. Feminism in America: A History, 2nd ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Office of the Secretary of Defense, Vietnam Task Force, United States–Vietnam Relations, 1945–67, Part IV, B, 2.Google Scholar

Ohmann, R. Selling Culture: Magazines, Markets, and Class at the Turn of the Century. London: Verso, 1996.Google Scholar

Olney, Martha. Buy Now Pay Later: Advertising, Credit, and Consumer Durables in the 1920s. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Olsen, John A. John Warden and the Renaissance of American Air Power. Washington, DC: Potomac, 2007.Google Scholar

Olsen, John A.“Boyd Revisited: A Great Mind with a Touch of Madness,” Air Power History (Winter 2016): 7–16.Google Scholar

Olsen, J. A. and van Creveld, M., eds. The Evolution of Operational Art: From Napoleon to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Orwell, George. Animal Farm. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1946.Google Scholar

Osanka, Franklin Mark, ed. Modern Guerrilla Warfare: Fighting Communist Guerrilla Movements, 1941–1961. New York: Glencoe, 1962 and 1964.Google Scholar

Osgood, R. E. Ideals and Self-Interest in America’s Foreign Relations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 1953.Google Scholar

Osgood, R. E. Limited War: The Challenge to American Strategy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Osgood, R. E. “Concepts of General and Limited War, Delivered at the Naval War College on 18 September 1959,” Naval War College Review 12, 4 (Dec. 1959): 1–18.Google Scholar

Osgood, R. E. Limited War Revisited. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1979.Google Scholar

Oshinsky, D. M. Polio: An American Story. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Osinga, Frans. Science, Strategy, and War: The Strategic Theory of John Boyd. PhD Diss., University of Leiden, 2005.Google Scholar

Osinga, Frans. “The Enemy as a Complex Adaptive System: John Boyd and Airpower in the Postmodern Era,” in Airpower Reborn: The Strategic Concepts of John Warden and John Boyd, ed. Olsen, John Andreas. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Oyos, Matthew. In Command: Theodore Roosevelt and the American Military. Washington, DC: Potomac [Nebraska Imprint], 2018.Google Scholar

Page, Ellen Wells. “A Flapper’s Appeal to Parents,” The Outlook, Dec. 6, 1922: 607.Google Scholar

Paparone, C. and Topic, G. L. Jr. “The ‘Clausewitz’ of Logistics: Henry E. Eccles,” Army Sustainment (Jan.–Feb. 2014): 9.Google Scholar

Pape, Robert A. Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Paret, Peter and Shy, John W.. Guerrillas in the 1960’s. Princeton Studies in World Politics, No. 1. New York: Praeger, 1962.Google Scholar

Parker, Christopher S. Fighting for Democracy: Black Veterans and the Struggle against White Supremacy in the Postwar South. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Parrish, M. E. Anxious Decades: American Prosperity and Depression, 1920–1941. New York: W. W. Norton, 1994.Google Scholar

Pattillo, Donald M. A History in the Making. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.Google Scholar

Payne, Keith B. The Great American Gamble: Deterrence Theory and Practice from the Cold War to the Twenty-first Century. Fairfax, VA: National Institute, 2008.Google Scholar

Peck, G. Prohibition in Washington, D.C.: How Dry We Weren't. Charleston, NC: History Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Perone, James E. The Music of the Counterculture Era. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2004.Google Scholar

Petersen, Walter J. “Deterrence and Compellence: A Critical Assessment of Conventional Wisdom,” International Studies Quarterly 30, 3 (Sept. 1986): 269–94.Google Scholar

Pettit, James S. Elements of Military Science, rev. ed. New Haven, CT: Tuttle, Morehouse & Taylor, 1895.Google Scholar

Phillips, Kimberley L. War! What Is It Good For? Black Freedom Struggles and the U.S. Military from World War II to Iraq. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Pike, Douglas. Viet Cong: The Organization of the National Liberation Front of South Vietnam. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Pike, Douglas. War, Peace, and the Viet Cong. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Pike, Douglas. “Guerrilla Warfare in Vietnam,” in Interdoc Conference, Guerrilla Warfare in Asia. The Hague: International Documentation and Information Center, 1971.Google Scholar

Pinckney, T. C., Lt.-Col. “Thoughts on the Limitation of War,” Air University Review 20, 2 (Jan.–Feb. 1969): 79–83.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Hutchison, 1959.Google Scholar

Prime, Nicholas. The Making of the Control School of Strategy: Joseph C. Wylie, Henry Eccles, and Herbert Rosinski at the US Naval War College 1950–1974. PhD Diss., Kings College, London, 2017.Google Scholar

Proctor, Pat. Containment and Credibility: The Ideology and Deception that Plunged America into the Vietnam War. New York: Carrel, 2016.Google Scholar

Public Papers of the Presidents: Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1954. Washington, DC: 1960; www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=10184Google Scholar

Puleston, W. D. The Life and Work of Captain Alfred Thayer Mahan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1939.Google Scholar

Purcell, Aaron D., ed. The New Deal and the Great Depression. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Racine College, report cards of W. Mitchell dated March 5, 1891; Nov. 18, 1892; and Dec. 23, 1893.Google Scholar

Reed, William and Sawyer, Katherine. “Bargaining Theory of War,” Oxford Bibliographies; http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com.Google Scholar

Reiter, Dan. “Exploring the Bargaining Model of War,” Perspectives on Politics 1, 1 (Mar. 2003): 27–43.Google Scholar

Roberts, M. E. III The Psychological War for Vietnam, 1960–1968. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2018.Google Scholar

Robin, Ron. The Cold World They Made: The Strategic Legacy of Roberta and Albert Wohlstetter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Rockoff, H. and Walton, G. M.. History of the American Economy, 11th ed. Mason, OH: Cengage, 2010.Google Scholar

Rockoff, Hugh. America’s Economic Way of War: War and the US Economy from the Spanish–American War to the Persian Gulf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Rofe, J. Simon. “‘Under the Influence of Mahan’: Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt and their Understanding of American National Interest,” Diplomacy & Statecraft 19 (2008): 732–45.Google Scholar

Røksund, Arne. The Jeune École: The Strategy of the Weak. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar

Rommel, E. The Rommel Papers, trans. Findlay, P., ed. Liddell Hart, B. H.. New York: Da Capo, 1953.Google Scholar

Rosen, Stephen Peter. “Vietnam and the American Theory of Limited War,” International Security 7, 2 (Autumn 1982): 83–113.Google Scholar

Rosinski, H. “Scharnhorst to Schlieffen: The Rise and Decline of German Military Thought,” Naval War College Review 27 (1976): 83–103.Google Scholar

Ross, Steven T. American War Plans 1890–1939. London: Frank Cass, 2002.Google Scholar

Rostow, W. W. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Roth, David. Sacred Honor: A Biography of Colin Powell. San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins, 1993.Google Scholar

Russ, Joanna. The Female Man. New York: Bantam, 1975.Google Scholar

Sanger, Richard H. “The Age of Sociopolitical Change,” Naval War College Review 22, 2 (Oct. 1969): 3–16.Google Scholar

Scheips, Paul J. The Role of Federal Forces in Domestic Disorders, 1945–1992. Washington, DC: CMH, 2005.Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. “An Essay on Bargaining,” American Economic Review 46, 3 (June 1956): 281–301.Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. “Bargaining, Communication, and Limited War,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1, 1 (Mar. 1957): 19–36.Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. “Strategy of Conflict: Prospectus for a Reorientation of Game Theory,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2, 3 (Sept. 1958): 203–64.Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. “The Reciprocal Fear of Surprise Attack,” RAND P-1342, April 16, 1958.Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. “Strategic Analysis and Social Problems,” Social Problems 12, 4 (Spring 1965): 367–79.Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. Controlled Response and Strategic Warfare, Adelphi Papers, no. 19. London: Institute for Strategic Studies, June 1965.Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Hans. Marine Maverik: General Smedley D. Butler and the Contradictions of American Military History. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1998.Google Scholar

Maj.Schmitt, J. F. “Out of Sync with Maneuver Warfare,” Marine Corps Gazette 78, 8 (Aug. 1994): 22.Google Scholar

Schneider, James J. and Izzo, Lawrence. “Clausewitz’s Elusive Center of Gravity,” Parameters (Sept. 1987): 46–57.Google Scholar

Schneirov, Richard, et al. The Pullman Strike and the Crisis of the 1890s: Essays on Labor and Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Schonberg, Karl K. “Robert E. Osgood and the Origins of Social International Relations Theory,” International Journal (Summer 2009): 811–23.Google Scholar

Schrecker, Ellen and Deery, Phillip. The Age of McCarthyism. New York: St. Martin’s, 2017.Google Scholar

Seager, Robert II. Alfred Thayer Mahan: The Man and His Letters. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute, 1977.Google Scholar

Sec. of Commerce. Statistical Abstract of the United States 1936. Washington, DC: GPO, 1936, 1–2.Google Scholar

Sec. of Treasury. Statistical Abstract of the United States 1879. Washington, DC: GPO, 1880, 146–47.Google Scholar

Series: Moving Images Relating to Military Aviation Activities, compiled 1947–1984, documenting the period 1909–1984; Record Group 342: Records of U.S. Air Force Commands, Activities, and Organizations, 1900–2003.Google Scholar

Sheehan, Neil. “The Role of the Press,” Naval War College Review 23, 6 (Feb. 1971): 4–7.Google Scholar

Sheehan, Neil. “The Press and the Pentagon Papers,” Naval War College Review 24, 6 (Feb. 1972): 8–12.Google Scholar

Sheehan, Neil, et al. The Pentagon Papers: The Secret History of the Vietnam War. New York: Racehorse, 2017.Google Scholar

Sheppard, Si. “Atomic Cinema: Nuclear Proliferation and Deterrence Theory as Refracted through the Camera Lens”; www.filmint.nu, 31–59.Google Scholar

Showalter, Elaine. “The Other Lost Generation,” in Sisters’ Choice: Tradition and Change in American Women’s Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Sights, Albert P. Jr., Col. “Limited War for Unlimited Goals,” Air University Quarterly Review 13, 3 (Spring 1962): 38–48.Google Scholar

Simon, Linda. Lost Girls: The Invention of the Flapper. London: Reaktion, 2017.Google Scholar

Simon, Rita James. Public Opinion in America: 1936–1970. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 1974.Google Scholar

Sims, William S. “The Inherent Tactical Qualities of All-Big-Gun, One-Caliber Battleships of High Speed, Large Displacement Gunpower,” Proceedings (Sept. 1906): 1337–66.Google Scholar

Smith, Gerard C. Director Policy Planning Staff, to John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State, Review of Strategic Concept, Memorandum dated January 20, 1959. Record Group 59, Dept. of State Participation in Operations Coordinating Board and National Security Council, 1947–63, Box 95, NSC 5810.Google Scholar

Somes, T. E., Capt. USN. “Musing on Naval Maneuver Warfare,” Naval War College Review 51, 3 (Summer 1998): 122–28.Google Scholar

Sondhaus, Lawrence. Naval Warfare, 1815–1914. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar

Spector, Ronald. Professors of War: The Naval War College and the Development of the Naval Profession. Newport, RI: Naval War College, 1977.Google Scholar

Spencer, David R. Yellow Journalism: The Press and America’s Emergence as a World Power. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Spencer, Herbert. A System of Synthetic Philosophy, 10 vols. New York: D. Appleton, 1862–93.Google Scholar

Sprout, M. T. “Mahan: Evangelist of Sea Power,” in Makers of Modern Strategy, ed. Earle., Edward Mead Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1943, 415–45.Google Scholar

Stavridis, James. The History and Geopolitics of the World’s Oceans. New York: Penguin, 2017.Google Scholar

Stebbins, Richard P. The Career of Herbert Rosinski: An Intellectual Pilgrimage. New York: Lang, 1989.Google Scholar

Stein, Harold. “Review of Robert E. Osgood, Limited War: The Challenge to American Strategy,” American Political Science Review 52, 2 (June 1958): 534.Google Scholar

Steiner, Barry H. Bernard Brodie and the Foundations of American Nuclear Strategy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1991.Google Scholar

Stern, Robert, et al. New York 1900: Metropolitan Architecture and Urbanism, 1890–1915. New York: Rizzoli, 1983.Google Scholar

Stout, Hiram M. “The Nature of Military Strategy, Lecture Delivered at the Naval War College on 18 October 1955,” Naval War College Review 8, 7 (Mar. 1956): 45–61.Google Scholar

Study on Military Professionalism. Carlisle Barracks, PA: US Army War College, 1970.Google Scholar

Sumida, Jon Tetsuro. Inventing Grand Strategy and Teaching Command: The Classic Works of Alfred Thayer Mahan Reconsidered. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Summers, H. G. Jr. On Strategy: The Vietnam War in Context. Carlisle, PA: SSI, 1981.Google Scholar

Summers, H. G. Jr. On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War. Novato, CA: Presidio, 1982.Google Scholar

Summers, H. G. Jr. On Strategy II: A Critical Analysis of the Gulf War. New York: Dell, 1992.Google Scholar

Sumner, William Graham. What Social Classes Owe Each Other. New York: Harper, 1884.Google Scholar

Swain, R. M. “Filling the Void: The Operational Art and the US Army,” in The Operational Art: Developments in the Theories of War, ed. McKercher, B. J. C. and Hennessy, Michael A.. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1996.Google Scholar

Swedberg, Richard. Economics and Sociology: Redefining their Boundaries: Conversations with Economists and Sociologists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Sweeney, P. “Maneuver Warfare Demands Logistics Based on a Foundation of [Radio Frequency Identification] 2.0,” Defense Transportation Journal 65, 5 (Sept. 2009): 17–20.Google Scholar

Tanham, George K. Communist Revolutionary Warfare: From the Vietminh to the Viet Cong, rev. ed. New York: Praeger, 1961 and 1967.Google Scholar

Taubman, William. Khrushchev: The Man and His Times. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2017.Google Scholar

Taylor, Maxwell. The Uncertain Trumpet. New York: Harper & Row, 1960.Google Scholar

Terriff, Terry, Karp, Aaron, and Karp, Regina, eds. Global Insurgency and the Future of Armed Conflict: Debating Fourth-Generation Warfare. London: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Terriff, Terry. “‘Innovate or Die’: Organizational Culture and the Origins of Maneuver Warfare in the United States Marine Corps,” Journal of Strategic Studies 29, 3 (June 2006): 475–503.Google Scholar

Sir Thompson, Robert. “Squaring the Error,” Foreign Affairs 46, 3 (Apr. 1968): 442–53.Google Scholar

Thompson, Wayne. “Operations over North Vietnam, 1965–1973,” in A History of Air Warfare, ed. Olsen, John Andreas. Washington, DC: Potomac, 2010, 107–26.Google Scholar

Tierney, Dominic. How We Fight: Crusades, Quagmires, and the American Way of War. New York: Little, Brown, 2010.Google Scholar

Till, G. Airpower and the Royal Navy 1914–1945: A Historical Survey. London: MacDonald and Jane’s, 1979.Google Scholar

Till, G. “Adopting the Aircraft Carrier: The British, American, and Japanese Case Studies,” in Military Innovation in the Interwar Period, ed. Murray, W. and Millett, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Tompkins, E. Berkeley Anti-Imperialism in the United States: The Great Debate, 1890–1920. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Trachtenberg, Marc. History and Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Truman Papers – Family, Business, and Personal Affairs Papers; Truman Library; https://trumanlibrary.orgGoogle Scholar

Turk, Richard W. The Ambiguous Relationship: Theodore Roosevelt and Alfred Thayer Mahan. New York: Greenwood, 1987.Google Scholar

Turner, Gordon B. “The Nature of War, Lecture Delivered at the Naval War College on 17 October 1955,” Naval War College Review 8, 7 (Mar. 1956): 25–43.Google Scholar

Twain, M. and Warner, C. D.. The Gilded Age: A Tale of Today. Hartford, CT: American Publishers, 1873.Google Scholar

United States–Vietnam Relations, 1945–1967, IV. A. 2, Vietnam Task Force, OSD, 1967–68.Google Scholar

Urban Research Corporation. Student Protest 1969 Summary (Chicago, 1970).Google Scholar

US Air Force Oral History Interview, K239, 0512-1066, Col. John R. Boyd, Jan. 28, 1977, Air University, 1.Google Scholar

U.S. Bureau of the Census. Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, DC: GPO, 1973.Google Scholar

US Bureau of Economic Analysis; www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product#gdpGoogle Scholar

US Congress Senate, Committee on Armed Services. Report of Proceedings: Inquiry into the Military Situation in the Far East and the Facts Surrounding the Relief of General of the Army Douglas MacArthur from his Assignment in that Area. Washington, DC: Ward & Paul, 1951.Google Scholar

US Congress. Report of the Commission on Industrial Relations. Chicago, IL: Bernard & Miller, 1915.Google Scholar

US Congress, Senate Committee on Armed Services. Report of Proceedings: Inquiry into the Military Situation in the Far East and the Facts Surrounding the Relief of General of the Army Douglas MacArthur from his Assignment in that Area. Washington, DC: Ward & Paul, 1951.Google Scholar

US Dept. Army. FM 100-1. The Army. Washington, DC: GPO, 1978.Google Scholar

US Dept. Education, National Center of Educational Statistics; http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10Google Scholar

US Forces. Somalia After Action Report. Washington, DC: GPO, 1995; repr. 2004.Google Scholar

Van Creveld, M. A History of Strategy: From Sun Tzu to William S. Lind. Kouvola, Finland: Castalia, 2015.Google Scholar

Wagner, Arthur L., Col. Strategy. Kansas City: Hudson-Kimberly, 1904.Google Scholar

Wainwright, R. “Our Naval Power,” Naval Institute Proceedings (Mar. 1898): 42.Google Scholar

Wallace, Max. The American Axis: Henry Ford, Charles Lindberg, and the Third Reich. New York: St. Martin’s, 2003.Google Scholar

Waller, Douglas. A Question of Loyalty: General Billy Mitchell and the Court-Martial That Gripped the Nation. New York: HarperCollins, 2004.Google Scholar

War Dept. FM 100-5. Operations. Washington, DC: GPO, 1939.Google Scholar

Warden, John A. III “The Grand Alliance: Strategy and Decision.” Master’s Thesis, Texas Technical University, 1975.Google Scholar

Warden, John A. III The Air Campaign: Planning for Combat. Washington, DC: NDU, 1988.Google Scholar

Warden, John A. III Interview in Desert Story Collection, Oct. 22, 1991, 4; May 30, 1991.Google Scholar

Warden, John A. III “Employing Air Power in the Twenty-first Century,” in The Future of Air Power in the Aftermath of the Gulf War, ed. Schultz, Richard A. Jr. and Pfaltzgraff, Robert L. Jr. Maxwell AFB, AL: Air University, 1992, 64–67.Google Scholar

Warden, John A. III “The Enemy as a System,” Airpower Journal 9, 1 (Spring 1995): 40–55.Google Scholar

Warden, John A. III “Success in Modern War: A Response to Robert Pape’s Bombing to Win,” Security Studies 7, 2 (Winter 1997/98): 172–78.Google Scholar