Alexander, K. (2011). Abusive supervision as a predictor of deviance and health outcomes: The exacerbating role of narcissism and social support. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.Google Scholar

Anderson, C., Buckley, K., & Carnagey, N. (2008). Creating your own hostile environment: A laboratory examination of trait aggressiveness and the violence escalation cycle. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 462–473.Google Scholar

Antonioni, D. (1998). Relationship between the Big Five personality factors and conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 336–355.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., & Byron, K. (2002). Dominating interpersonal behavior and perceived victimization in groups: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship. Journal of Management, 28, 69–87.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741.Google Scholar

Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aryee, S., Sun, L. Y., Chen, Z. X. G., & Debrah, Y. A. (2008). Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4, 393–411.Google Scholar

Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamberger, P. A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2006). Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress, and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59, 723–752.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.Google Scholar

Barnes, C. M., Lucianetti, L., Bhave, D. P., & Christian, M. S. (2015). You wouldn’t like me when I’m sleepy: Leader sleep, daily abusive supervision, and work unit engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1419–1437.Google Scholar

Biron, M. (2010). Negative reciprocity and the association between perceived organizational ethical values and organizational deviance. Human Relations, 63, 875–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowling, N. A., Beehr, T. A., Bennett, M. M., & Watson, C. P. (2010). Prospective examination of the relationship between victim personality and workplace harassment. Work & Stress, 24, 140–158.Google Scholar

Brees, J., Mackey, J., Martinko, M., & Harvey, P. (2014). The mediating role of perceptions of abusive supervision in the relationship between personality and aggression. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21, 403–413.Google Scholar

Burton, J. P., & Hoobler, J. M. (2011). Aggressive reactions to abusive supervision: The role of interactional justice and narcissism. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 389–398.Google Scholar

Burton, J. P., Hoobler, J. M., & Kernan, M. C. (2011). When research setting is important: The influence of subordinate self-esteem on reactions to abusive supervision. Organization Management Journal, 8, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burton, J. P., Hoobler, J. M., & Scheuer, M. L. (2012). Supervisor workplace stress and abusive supervision: The buffering effect of exercise. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 271–279.Google Scholar

Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452–459.Google Scholar

Carson, A. T., & Baker, R. C. (1994). Psychological correlates of codependency in women. Substance Abuse & Misuse, 29, 395–407.Google Scholar

Chi, S.-C. S., & Liang, S.-G. (2013). When do subordinates’ emotion-regulation strategies matter? Abusive supervision, subordinates’ emotional exhaustion, and work withdrawal. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 125–137.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 887–898.Google Scholar

Coyne, I., Seigne, E., & Randall, P. (2000). Predicting workplace victim status from personality. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 9, 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, S. C., Kiewitz, C., Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Kim, Y., & Chun, J. (2008). Cognitions, emotions and evaluations: An elaboration likelihood model for workplace aggression. Academy of Management Review, 33, 425–451.Google Scholar

Douglas, S. C., & Martinko, M. J. (2001). Exploring the role of individual differences in the prediction of workplace aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 547–559.Google Scholar

Dunlop, P. D., & Lee, K. (2004). Workplace deviance, organisational citizenship behaviour and business unit performance: The bad apples do spoil the whole barrel. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 25, 67–80.Google Scholar

Eesley, D. T., & Meglich, P. A. (2013). Empirical evidence of abusive supervision in entrepreneurial and small firms. Journal of Ethics & Entrepreneurship, 3, 39–59.Google Scholar

Einarsen, E., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2003). Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Einarsen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1996). Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 5, 185–201.Google Scholar

Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Frank, P. B., & Golden, G. K. (1992). Blaming by naming: Battered women and the epidemic of codependence. Social Work, 37, 5–6.Google Scholar

Graeff, C. (1997). Evolution of situational leadership theory: A critical review. The Leadership Quarterly, 8, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Development of Leader–Member exchange theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.Google Scholar

Greenbaum, R. L., Hill, A., Mawritz, M. B., & Quade, M. J. (in press). Employee Machiavellianism to unethical behavior: The role of abusive supervision as a trait activator. Journal of Management. DOI: 10.1177/0149206314535434Google Scholar

Harvey, P., Harris, K. J., Gillis, W. E., & Martinko, M. J. (2014). Abusive supervision and the entitled employee. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 204–217.Google Scholar

Henle, C. A., & Gross, M. A. (2014). What have I done to deserve this? Effects of employee personality and emotion on abusive supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 461–474.Google Scholar

Hobman, E. V., Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Tang, R. L. (2009). Abusive supervision in advising relationships: Investigating the role of social support. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58, 233–256.Google Scholar

Hoobler, J., & Brass, D. (2006). Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1125–1133.Google Scholar

Hoobler, J. M., & Hu, J. (2013). A model of injustice, abusive supervision, and negative affect. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 256–269.Google Scholar

House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 7, 323–352.Google Scholar

Inness, M., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2005). Understanding supervisor-targeted aggression: A within-person between-jobs design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 731–739.Google Scholar

Jian, Z., Kwan, H. K., Qiu, Q., Liu, Z. Q., & Kim, F. H.-K. (2012). Abusive supervision and frontline employees’ service performance. The Service Industries Journal, 32, 683–698.Google Scholar

Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 517–625.Google Scholar

Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Different provocations trigger aggression in narcissists and psychopaths. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 12–18.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780.Google Scholar

Karmen, A. (2003). Crime victims: An introduction to victimology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar

Kiazad, K., Restubog, S. L. D., Zagenczyk, T. J., Kiewitz, C., & Tang, R. L. (2010). In pursuit of power: The role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 512–519.Google Scholar

Kiewitz, C., Restubog, S. L. D., Zagenczyk, T. J., Scott, K. D., Garcia, P. R. J. M., & Tang, R. L. (2012). Sins of the parents: Self-control as a buffer between supervisors’ previous experience of family undermining and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervision. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 869–882.Google Scholar

Klaussner, S. (2014). Engulfed in the abyss: The emergence of abusive supervision as an escalating process of supervisor-subordinate interaction. Human Relations, 67, 311–332.Google Scholar

Landau, S. F., & Freeman-Longo, R. E. (1990). Classifying victims: A proposed multidimensional victimological typology. International Review of Victimology, 1, 267–286.Google Scholar

Lee, S., Yun, S., & Srivastava, A. (2013). Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between abusive supervision and creativity in South Korea. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 724–731.Google Scholar

Levinson, H. (1978). The abrasive personality. Harvard Business Review, 56, 86–94.Google Scholar

Lian, H., Brown, D. J., Ferris, D. L., Liang, L. H., Keeping, L. M., & Morrison, R. (2014). Abusive supervision and retaliation: A self-control framework. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 116–139.Google Scholar

Lian, H., Ferris, D. L., & Brown, D. J. (2012). Does power distance exacerbate or mitigate the effects of abusive supervision? It depends on the outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 107–123.Google Scholar

Lin, W., Wang, L., & Chen, S. (2013). Abusive supervision and employee well-being: The moderating effect of power distance orientation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 62, 308–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, J., Kwan, H. K., Wu, L., & Wu, W. (2010). Abusive supervision and subordinate supervisor-directed deviance: The moderating role of traditional values and the mediating role of revenge cognitions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 835–856.Google Scholar

Mackey, J. D., Ellen III, B. P., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2013). Subordinate social adaptability and the consequences of abusive supervision perceptions in two samples. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 732–746.Google Scholar

Mackey, J. D., Frieder, R. E., Brees, J. R., & Martinko, M. J. (in press). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management. DOI: 10.1177/0149206315573997CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martinko, M. J., Douglas, S. C., & Harvey, P. (2006). Understanding and managing workplace aggression. Organizational Dynamics, 35, 117–130.Google Scholar

Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Brees, J. R., & Mackey, J. (2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, S120–S137.Google Scholar

Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Sikora, D., & Douglas, S. C. (2011). Perceptions of abusive supervision: The role of subordinates’ attribution styles. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 751–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martinko, M. J., & Zellars, K. L. (1998). Toward a theory of workplace violence: A cognitive appraisal perspective. In Griffin, R. W., O’Leary-Kelly, A, & Collins, J. M. (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations: Violent and deviant behavior (pp. 1–42). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Matthiesen, S., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Perpetrators and targets of bullying at work: Role stress and individual differences. Violence and Victims, 22, 735–753.Google Scholar

Mawritz, M. B., Dust, S. B., & Resick, C. J. (2014). Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: Does conscientiousness matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 737–747.Google Scholar

Mawritz, M. B., Mayer, D. M., Hoobler, J. M., Wayne, S. J., & Marinova, S. V. (2012). A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 65, 325–357.Google Scholar

May, D., Wesche, J. S., Heinitz, K., & Kerschreiter, R. (2014). Coping with destructive leadership: Putting forward an integrated theoretical framework for the interaction process between leaders and followers. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 222, 203–213.Google Scholar

Michalak, R. (2014). A dual theory, process-and-variance model of workplace mistreatment and its effects in organisations from the individual target’s perspective. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar

Milam, A. C., Spitzmueller, C., & Penney, L. M. (2009). Investigating individual differences among targets of workplace incivility. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 58–69.Google Scholar

Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1159–1168.Google Scholar

Mitchell, M. S., (2012). Employees’ behavioral reactions to supervisor aggression: An examination of individual and situational factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1148–1170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mumford, M. D., Dansereau, F., & Yammarino, F. J. (2000). Followers, motivations and levels of analysis: The case of individualized leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 313–340.Google Scholar

Nandkeolyar, A. K., Shaffer, J. A., Li, A., Ekkirala, S., & Bagger, J. (2014). Surviving an abusive supervisor: The joint roles of conscientiousness and coping strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 138–150.Google Scholar

Neves, P. (2014). Taking it out on survivors: Submissive employees, downsizing, and abusive supervision. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 507–534.Google Scholar

O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., & O’Boyle, A. S. (2011). Bad apples or bad barrels: An examination of group- and organizational-level effects in the study of counterproductive work behavior. Group & Organization Management, 36, 39–69.Google Scholar

O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Griffin, R. W., & Glew, D. J. (1996). Organization-motivated aggression: A research framework. Academy of Management Review, 21, 225–253.Google Scholar

Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere (Wiley).Google Scholar

Pyc, L. S. (2011). The moderating effects of workplace ambiguity and perceived job control on the relations between abusive supervision and employees’ behavioral, psychological, and physical strains. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY.Google Scholar

Quine, L. (1999). Workplace bullying in the NHS community trust: Staff questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 318, 228–232.Google Scholar

Rafferty, A. E., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2011). The influence of abusive supervisors on followers’ organizational citizenship behaviours: The hidden costs of abusive supervision. British Journal of Management, 22, 270–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rafferty, A. E., Restubog, S. L. D., & Jimmieson, N. L. (2010). Losing sleep: Examining the cascading effects of supervisors’ experience of injustice on subordinates’ psychological health. Work & Stress, 24, 36–55.Google Scholar

Ramirez, O. (2013). Survivors of school bullying: A collective case study. Children & Schools, 35, 93–99.Google Scholar

Restubog, S. L. D., Scott, K. L., & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2011). When distress hits home: The role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees’ responses to abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 713–729.Google Scholar

Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-spotting or problematization? Organization, 18, 23–44.Google Scholar

Scheuer, M. L. (2013). Linking abusive supervision to engagement and burnout: An application of the differentiated job demands-resource model. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY.Google Scholar

Shoss, M. K., Eisenberger, R., Restubog, S. L. D., & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2013). Blaming the organization for abusive supervision: The roles of perceived organizational support and supervisor’s organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 158–168.Google Scholar

Sulea, C., Fine, S., Fischmann, G., Sava, F. A., & Dumitru, C. (2013). Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating effects of personality. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12, 196–200.Google Scholar

Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 4, 178–190.Google Scholar

Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33, 261–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Breaux, D. M., Geider, S., Hu, C., & Hua, W. (2009). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 156–167.Google Scholar

Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A., & Lambert, L. S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59, 101–123.Google Scholar

Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–517.Google Scholar

Tsafos, A., & Black, S. (2009). An examination of the characteristics of passive and provocative victims of bullying. American Public Health Association. Philadelphia, PA, November.Google Scholar

Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R., & Lowe, K., Carsten, M. (2014). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 83–104.Google Scholar

Vogel, R. M., Mitchell, M. S., Tepper, B. J., Restubog, S. L. D., Hu, C., Hua, W., & Huang, J.-C. (2015). A cross-cultural examination of subordinates’ perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 720–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, G., Harms, P. D., & Mackey, J. D. (2015). Does it take two to tangle? Subordinates’ perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 487–503.Google Scholar

Wang, R., & Jiang, J. (2014). How do narcissistic employees respond to abusive supervision: Two roles of narcissism in decreasing perception and increasing deviance. Psychological Reports: Employment Psychology & Marketing, 115, 1–9.Google Scholar

Wang, W., Mao, J., Wu, W., & Liu, J. (2012). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance: The mediating role of interactional justice and the moderating role of power distance. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50, 43–60.Google Scholar

Wei, F., & Si, S. (2013). Tit for tat? Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating effects of locus of control and perceived mobility. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30, 281–296.Google Scholar

Weiner, B. 1985. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychology Review, 92, 548–573.Google Scholar

Wen-Hsu, L. (2014). Theories of Victimization. The Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Published online January 22.Google Scholar

Wheeler, A. R., Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Whitman, M. V. (2013). The interactive effects of abusive supervision and entitlement on emotional exhaustion and co-worker abuse. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitman, M. V., Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Shanine, K. K. (2013). Psychological entitlement and abusive supervision: Political skill as a self-regulatory mechanism. Health Care Management Review, 38, 248–257.Google Scholar

Wu, T.-Y., & Hu, C. (2013). Abusive supervision and subordinate emotional labor: The moderating role of openness personality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 956–970.Google Scholar

Wyld, D. C. (2013). Transformation leadership: When is it redundant? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27. DOI: 10.5465/amp.2013.0064Google Scholar

Zapf, D. (1999). Organisational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20, 70–85.Google Scholar

Zapf, D., Knorz, C., & Kulla, M. (1996). On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment and health outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 215–237.Google Scholar

Amir, M. (1967). Victim precipitated forcible rape. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 58, 493–502.Google Scholar

Aquino, K. (2000). Structural and individual determinants of workplace victimization: The effects of hierarchical status and conflict management style. Journal of Management, 26(2), 171–193.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., & Bradfield, M. (2000). Perceived victimization in the workplace: The role of situational factors and victim characteristics. Organization Science, 11(5), 525–537.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., & Byron, K. (2002). Dominating interpersonal behavior and perceived victimization in groups: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship. Journal of Management, 28(1), 69–87.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., & Lamertz, K. (2004). A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1023–1034.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741.Google Scholar

Berdahl, J. L. (2007). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 425–437.Google Scholar

Berger, R. J., & Searles, P. (1985). Victim-offender interaction in rape: Victimological, situational, and feminist perspectives. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 9–15.Google Scholar

Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 18, 3–10.Google Scholar

Bohner, G., Siebler, F., & Schmelcher, J. (2006). Social norms and the likelihood of raping: Perceived rape myth acceptance of others affects men’s rape proclivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 286–297.Google Scholar

Brekke, N., & Borgida, E. (1988). Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(3), 372–386.Google Scholar

Brown, A. L., & Messman-Moore, T. L. (2010). Personal and perceived peer attitudes supporting sexual aggression as predictors of male college students’ willingness to intervene against sexual aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 503–517.Google Scholar

Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230.Google Scholar

Campbell, R., Fehler Cabral, G., Pierce, S. J., Sharma, D. B., Bybee, D., Shaw, J., Horsford, S., & Feeney, H. (2015). The Detroit Sexual Assault Kit (SAK) Action Research Project (ARP), Final Report. Available at www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/248680.pdfGoogle Scholar

Chan, M. E., & McAllister, D. J. (2014). Abusive supervision through the lens of employee state paranoia. Academy of Management Review, 39(1), 44–66.Google Scholar

Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Strategies for qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 249–291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Coates, L., & Wade, A. (2004). Telling it like it isn’t: Obscuring perpetrator responsibility for violent crime. Discourse & Society, 15(5), 499–526.Google Scholar

Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 55–75.Google Scholar

Cortina, L. M. & Berdahl, J. L. (2008). Sexual harassment in organizations: A decade of research in review. In Barling, J. & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 469–496). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Leskinen, E. A., Huerta, M., & Magley, V. J. (2013). Selective incivility as modern discrimination in organizations evidence and impact. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1579–1605.Google Scholar

Cowan, G. (2000). Beliefs about the causes of four types of rape. Sex Roles, 42(9–10), 807–823.Google Scholar

Dall’Ara, E., & Maass, A. (1999). Studying sexual harassment in the laboratory: Are egalitarian women at higher risk? Sex Roles, 41(9–10), 681–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devine, P. G. & Monteith, M. J. (1999). Automaticity and control in stereotyping. In Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 339–360). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Eigenberg, H., & Garland, T. (2003). Victim blaming. In Moriarty, L. J. (Ed.), Controversies in victimology (pp. 15–24). Newark, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar

Escamilla v. SMS Holdings Corp., 2011, WL 5025254 (D. Minn. Oct. 21, 2011).Google Scholar

Fischer, G. J. (1996). Deceptive, verbally coercive college males: Attitudinal predictors and lies told. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 527–533.Google Scholar

Franklin, C. W., & Franklin, A. P. (1976). Victimology revisited: A critique and suggestions for future direction. Criminology, 14(1), 125–136.Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch (2010). “I used to think the law would protect me”: Illinois’s failure to test rape kits. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar

IACP. (2005). Sexual assault incident reports: Investigative strategies. Alexandria, VA: International Association of Chiefs of Police.Google Scholar

Jones, M. (2002). Social psychology of prejudice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Kabat-Farr, D., & Cortina, L. M. (2012). Selective incivility: Gender, race, and the discriminatory workplace. In Fox, S. & Lituchy, T. (Eds.), Gender and the dysfunctional workplace (pp. 107–119). Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Kim, E. & Glomb, T. M. (2014). Victimization of high performers: The roles of envy and work group identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 619–634.Google Scholar

Koss, M. P. (1985). The hidden rape victim: Personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(2), 193–212.Google Scholar

Koss, M. P., & Dinero, T. E. (1989). Predictors of sexual aggression among a national sample of male college students. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 529, 133–147.Google Scholar

Kutash, I. L. (1978). Treating the victim of aggression. In Kutash, I. L., Kutash, S. B., Schlesinger, L. B., & Kutash, S. B. (Eds.), Violence: Perspectives on murder and aggression (pp. 446–461). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Kutash, I. L. (1984). Aggression victimology: Treatment of the victim. Current Issues in Psychoanalytic Practice, 1(2), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LeGrand, C. E. (1973). Rape and rape laws: Sexism in society and law. California Law Review, 61, 919–941.Google Scholar

Loh, C., Gidycz, C. A., Lobo, T. R., & Luthra, R. (2005). A prospective analysis of sexual assault perpetration: Risk factors related to perpetrator characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1325–1348.Google Scholar

Lonsway, K. A., Cortina, L. M. & Magley, V. J. (2008). Sexual harassment mythology: Definition, conceptualization, and measurement. Sex Roles, 58(9), 599–615.Google Scholar

Lonsway, K. A. & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths in review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(2), 133–164.Google Scholar

Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth scale, 33(1), 27–68.Google Scholar

Malamuth, N. M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37(4), 138–157.Google Scholar

Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G., & Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 853–870.Google Scholar

Meloy, M. L., & Miller, S. L. (2011). The victimization of women: Law, policies, and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Milam, A. C., Spitzmueller, C., & Penney, L. M. (2009). Investigating individual differences among targets of workplace incivility. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(1), 58–69.Google Scholar

Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, 523 U.S. 75 (1998)Google Scholar

Samnani, A. K. (2013). Embracing new directions in workplace bullying research: A paradigmatic approach. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(1), 26–36.Google Scholar

Samnani, A. K. & Singh, P. (2015). Workplace bullying: Considering the interaction between individual and work environment. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2653-x.Google Scholar

Scott, K. L., Restubog, S. L., & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2013). A social exchange-based model of the antecedents of workplace exclusion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 37–48.Google Scholar

Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1984). Convicted rapists’ vocabulary of motive: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems, 31(5), 530–544.Google Scholar

Spears, J. W., & Spohn, C. C. (1997). The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Justice Quarterly, 14(3), 501–524.Google Scholar

Stockdale, M. S. (2005). The sexual harassment of men: Articulating the approach-rejection theory of sexual harassment. In Gruber, J. E. & Morgan, P. (Eds.), In the company of men: Re-discovering the links between sexual harassment and male domination (pp. 117–142). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar

Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A., & Lambert, L. S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 101–123.Google Scholar

Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., & Duffy, M. K. (2011). Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 279–294.Google Scholar

Tetreault, P. A. (1989). Rape myth acceptance: A case for providing educational expert testimony in rape jury trials. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 7(2), 243–257.Google Scholar

Thompson, M. P., Koss, M. P., Kingree, J. B., & Rice, J. (2011). A prospective mediational model of sexual aggression among college men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 2716–2734.Google Scholar

Tyler, K., Hoyt, D. R., & Whitbeck, L. B. (1998). Coercive sexual strategies. Violence and Victims, 13(1), 47–61.Google Scholar

The Weiner Report (2002). DNA justice: Cases solved at last. New York: Author.Google Scholar

Timmer, D. A., & Norman, W. H. (1984). Ideology of victim precipitation. Criminal Justice Review, 9, 63–68.Google Scholar

Vogel, B. L. (2000). Correlates of pre-college males’ sexual aggression: Attitudes, beliefs and behavior. Women & Criminal Justice, 11, 25–47.Google Scholar

Von Hentig, H. (1940). Remarks on the interaction of perpetrator and victim. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 31, 303.Google Scholar

Von Hentig, H. (1948). The criminal & his victim: Studies in the sociobiology of crime. Oxford: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Weis, K., & Borges, S. S. (1973). Victimology and rape: The case of the legitimate victim. Issues in Criminology, 71–115.Google Scholar

Wiederspahn, A. (2013, September 12). Military catches flak for poster that warns of sexual assaults. MSNBC. Available at www.msnbc.com/jansing-co/military-catches-flak-poster-warnsGoogle Scholar

Wisan, G. (1979). The treatment of rape in criminology textbooks. Victimology, 4(1), 86–99.Google Scholar

Wolfgang, M. F. (1957). Victim precipitated criminal homicide. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 48, 1, 1–11.Google Scholar

Amanatullah, E. T., & Tinsley, C. H. (2013). Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much ... or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(1), 110–122.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471.Google Scholar

Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614.Google Scholar

Arnold, K. A., Dupré, K. E., Hershcovis, M. S., & Turner, N. (2011). Interpersonal targets and types of workplace aggression as a function of perpetrator sex. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 23(3), 163–170.Google Scholar

Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33(1), 1–4.Google Scholar

Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Hjelt-Bäck, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20(3), 173–184.Google Scholar

Browne, K. (2005). Snowball sampling: Using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice, 8(1), 47–60.Google Scholar

Buchanan, N. T., Settles, I. H., & Woods, K. C. (2008). Comparing sexual harassment subtypes among black and white women by military rank: Double jeopardy, the jezebel, and the cult of true womanhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 347–361.Google Scholar

Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.Google Scholar

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Labor force statistics from the current population survey.Google Scholar

Buss, A. H. (1961). The psychology of aggression. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

Catalyst, Inc. (2012). Missing pieces: Women and minorities on Fortune 500 boards. (Research Report). New York: Author. Retrieved from www.catalyst.org/knowledge/missing-pieces-women-and-minorities-fortune-500-boards-2012-alliance-board-diversity, last accessed October 11, 2016.Google Scholar

Clair, J. A., Beatty, J. E., & MacLean, T. L. (2005). Out of sight but not out of mind: Managing invisible identities in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 78–95.Google Scholar

Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 55–75.Google Scholar

Cortina, L. M., Curtin, N., & Stewart, A. J. (2012). Where is social structure in personality research?: A feminist analysis of publication trends. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(3), 259–273.Google Scholar

Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Leskinen, E. A., Huerta, M., & Magley, V. J. (2013). Selective incivility as modern discrimination in organizations evidence and impact. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1579–1605.Google Scholar

Cortina, L. M., Lonsway, K. A., Magley, V. J., Freeman, L. V., Collinsworth, L. L., Hunter, M., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2002). What’s gender got to do with it? Incivility in the federal courts. Law & Social Inquiry, 27(2), 235–270.Google Scholar

Cuddy, A. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648.Google Scholar

Devine, P. G., & Monteith, M. J. (1999). Automaticity and control in stereotyping. In Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 339–360). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408–423.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In Eckes, T. & Trautner, H. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (2006). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(2), 77–83.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: a test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 578–589.Google Scholar

Gallus, J. A., Bunk, J. A., Matthews, R. A., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Magley, V. J. (2014). An eye for an eye? Exploring the relationship between workplace incivility experiences and perpetration. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(2), 143–154.Google Scholar

Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224.Google Scholar

Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 148–170.Google Scholar

Graham, S. (1992). “Most of the subjects were White and middle class”: Trends in published research on African Americans in selected APA journals, 1970–1989. American Psychologist, 47(5), 629–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, D. A., Kravitz, D. A., Mayer, D. M., Leslie, L. M., & Lev-Arey, D. (2006). Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1013–1036.Google Scholar

Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657–674.Google Scholar

Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Arnold, K. A., Dupré, K. E., Inness, M., LeBlanc, M. M., & Sivanathan, N. (2007). Predicting workplace aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 228–238.Google Scholar

Holland, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2013). When sexism and feminism collide: The sexual harassment of feminist working women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(2), 192–208.Google Scholar

Huang, J. L., Liu, M., & Bowling, N. A. (2015). Insufficient effort responding: Examining an insidious confound in survey data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 828–845.Google Scholar

Jones, M. (2002). Social psychology of prejudice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Kabat-Farr, D., & Cortina, L. M. (2014). Sex-based harassment in employment: New insights into gender and context. Law and Human Behavior, 38(1), 58–72.Google Scholar

Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Konik, J., & Cortina, L. M. (2008). Policing gender at work: Intersections of harassment based on sex and sexuality. Social Justice Research, 21(3), 313–337.Google Scholar

LeBlanc, M. M., & Kelloway, E. K. (2002). Predictors and outcomes of workplace violence and aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 444–453.Google Scholar

Leskinen, E. A., Rabelo, V. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2015). Gender stereotyping and harassment: A “catch-22” for women in the workplace. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(2), 192–204.Google Scholar

Lin, M. H., Kwan, V. S. Y., Cheung, A., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). Stereotype content model explains prejudice for an envied outgroup: Scale of anti-Asian American stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 34–47.Google Scholar

Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G., & Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 853–870.Google Scholar

MacDonald, T. K., & Zanna, M. P. (1998). Cross-dimension ambivalence toward social groups: Can ambivalence affect intentions to hire feminists? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(4), 427–441.Google Scholar

McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (1998). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific forms, potential causes, and preferred targets. Journal Of Management, 24(3), 391–419.Google Scholar

Neuman, J. H., (2005). Aggression in the workplace: A social-psychological perspective. In Fox, S., Spector, P. E., Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 13–40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Operario, D., & Fiske, S. T. (1998). Racism equals power plus prejudice: A social psychological equation for racial oppression. In Eberhardt, J. L., Fiske, S. T., Eberhardt, J. L., & Fiske, S. T. (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 33–53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar

Ott, J. S. (1989). The organizational culture perspective. Chicago: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar

Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188.Google Scholar

Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Porath, C. L. (2000). Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organizational Dynamics, 29(2), 123–137.Google Scholar

Pearson, C. M. & Porath, C. L. (2004). On incivility, its impact and directions for future research. In Griffin, R. & O’Leary-Kelly, A. (Eds.), The dark side of organizational behavior (pp. 403–425). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Rabelo, V. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2014). Two sides of the same coin: Gender harassment and heterosexist harassment in LGBQ work lives. Law & Human Behavior, 38, 378–391.Google Scholar

Roth, L. M. (2004). The social psychology of tokenism: Status and homophily processes on Wall Street. Sociological Perspectives, 47(2), 189–214.Google Scholar

Rozin, P. (2001). Social psychology and science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1), 2–14.Google Scholar

Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179.Google Scholar

Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal Of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 515–530.Google Scholar

Shteynberg, G., Leslie, L. M., Knight, A. P., & Mayer, D. M. (2011). But affirmative action hurts us! Race-related beliefs shape perceptions of White disadvantage and policy unfairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434–443.Google Scholar

Stanton, J. M., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2001). Using Internet/intranet Web pages to collect organizational research data. Organizational Research Methods, 4(3), 200–217.Google Scholar

Stanton, J. M., & Weiss, E. M. (2002). Online panels for social science research: An introduction to the StudyResponse project. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, School of Information Studies, Tech. Rep, 13001.Google Scholar

Thomas, K. M., Johnson-Bailey, J., Phelps, R. E., Tran, N. M., & Johnson, L. (2013). Moving from pet to threat: Narratives of professional Black women. In Comas-Diaz, L. & Green, B. (Eds.), The psychological health of women of color: Intersections, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 275–286). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Waldo, C. R. (1999). Working in a majority context: A structural model of heterosexism as minority stress in the workplace. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(2), 218–232.Google Scholar

Westwood, R. I., & Leung, A. S. M. (1999). Women in management in Hong Kong and Beijing: between pragmatism and patriarchy. In Fosh, P., Chan, A. W., Chow, W. S., Snape, E., & Westwood, R. (Eds.), Hong Kong management and labor: Change and continuity (pp. 199–219). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Yoder, J. D., & Aniakudo, P. (1996). When pranks become harassment: The case of African American women firefighters. Sex Roles, 35(5–6), 253–270.Google Scholar

Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423–1440.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D. (1994). Why act for the public good? Four answers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 603–610.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. (1998). The self. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 680–740). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bazemore, G. (1998). Restorative justice and earned redemption: Communities, victims, and offender reintegration. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 768–813.Google Scholar

Bell, C. M., & Main, K. J. (2011). Deonance and distrust: Motivated third party information seeking following disclosure of an agent’s unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 77–96.Google Scholar

Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349–360.Google Scholar

Bhatnagar, N., & Manchanda, R. V. (2013). Understanding why and how individuals choose to help others: indirect reciprocal considerations and the moderating role of situation severity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2185–2194.Google Scholar

Blader, S. L., Wiesenfeld, B. M., Fortin, M., & Wheeler-Smith, S. L. (2013). Fairness lies in the heart of the beholder: How the social emotions of third parties influence reactions to injustice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 62–80.Google Scholar

Blasi, A. (1983). Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review, 3, 178–210.Google Scholar

Bowes-Sperry, L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2005). To act or not to act: The dilemma faced by sexual harassment observers. Academy of Management Review, 30, 288–306.Google Scholar

Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). (2011, March). Workplace violence, 1993–2009: National crime victimization survey and the census of fatal occupational injuries. U.S. Department of Justice, NCJ 233231.Google Scholar

Cheung, I., & Olson, J. M. (2013). Sometimes it’s easier to forgive my transgressor than your transgressor: Effects of subjective temporal distance on forgiveness for harm to self or close other. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 195–200.Google Scholar

Christian, M. S., Eisenkraft, N., & Kapadia, C. (i2015). Dynamic associations among somatic complaints, human energy, and discretionary behaviors: Experiences with pain fluctuations at work. Administrative Science Quarterly.Google Scholar

Cohen, R. T., & Morse, L. (2014). Moral character: What it is and what it does. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 43–61.Google Scholar

D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2010). The limits to workplace friendship: Managerialist HRM and bystander behaviour in the context of workplace bullying. Employee Relations, 33, 269–288.Google Scholar

De Cremer, D., Wubben, M. J., & Brebels, L. (2008). When unfair treatment leads to anger: The effects of other people’s emotions and ambiguous unfair procedures. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2518–2549.Google Scholar

de Kwaadsteniet, E. W., Rijkhoff, S. A., & van Dijk, E. (2013). Equality as a benchmark for third party punishment and reward: The moderating role of uncertainty in social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 251–259.Google Scholar

Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappan, M. (2007). Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 993–1005.Google Scholar

Deutsch, M. (1974). Awaking the sense of injustice. In Lerner, M. & Ross, M. (Eds.), The quest for justice: Myth, reality, ideal (pp. 19–42). Toronto, ON: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331–351.Google Scholar

Dunlop, P. D., & Lee, K. (2004). Workplace deviance, organizational citizenship behavior, and business unit performance: The bad apples do spoil the whole barrel. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 67–80.Google Scholar

Dutton, J. E., Workman, K. M., & Hardin, A. E. (2014). Compassion at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 277–304.Google Scholar

Einarsen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1996). Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 185–201.Google Scholar

Erikson, E. H. (1964). Insight and responsibility, New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Exline, J. J., Worthington, E. L., Hill, P., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Forgiveness and justice: A research agenda for social and personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 337–348.Google Scholar

Ferguson, M., & Barry, B. (2011). I know what you did: The effects of interpersonal deviance of bystanders. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 80–94.Google Scholar

Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., Berry, J. W., & Lian, H. (2008). The development and validation of the workplace ostracism scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1348–1366.Google Scholar

Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In Gilliland, S. W., Steiner, D., & Skarlicki, D. P. (Eds.), Research in social issues in management (pp. 3–31). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2010). Social hierarchies and the evolution of moral emotions. In Schminke, M. (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes (2nd ed., pp. 207–229). New York: Psychology Press/Routledge.Google Scholar

Folger, R., Ganegoda, D. B., Rice, D. B., Taylor, R., & Wo, D. X. H. (2013). Bounded autonomy and behavioral ethics: Deonance and reactance as competing motives. Human Relations, 66, 905–924.Google Scholar

Folger, R., & Glerum, D. R. (2015). Justice and deonance: “You ought to be fair.” In Cropanzano, R. & Ambrose, M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace (pp. 331–350). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Folger, R., Johnson, M. A., & Letwin, C. R. (2014). Evolving concepts of evolution: The case of shame and guilt. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 659–671.Google Scholar

Fragale, A. R., Rosen, B., Xu, C., & Merideth, I. (2009). The higher they are, the harder they fall: The effects of wrongdoer status on observer punishment recommendations and intentionality attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 53–65.Google Scholar

Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Frijda, N. H., & Mesquita, B. (1994). The social role and functions of emotions. In Kitayama, S. & Markus, H. R. (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 51–88). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Glomb, T. M., & Liao, H. (2003). Interpersonal aggression in work groups: Social influence, reciprocal, and individual effects. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 486–496.Google Scholar

Glomb, T. M., Richman, W. L., Hulin, C. L., & Drasgow, F. (1997). Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 309–328.Google Scholar

Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Optimism, promotion pride, and prevention pride as predictors of quality of life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1521–1532.Google Scholar

Green, J. D., Burnette, J. L., & Davis, J. L. (2008). Third party forgiveness: (Not) forgiving your close other’s betrayer. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 407–418.Google Scholar

Greenbaum, R. L., Mawritz, M. B., Mayer, D. M., & Priesemuth, M. (2013). To act out, to withdraw, or to constructively resist? Employee reactions to supervisor abuse of customers and the moderating role of employee moral identity. Human Relations, 66, 925–950.Google Scholar

Gross, J. J. (1999). Emotion and emotion regulation. In Pervin, L. & John, O. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 525–552). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In Davidson, R. J., Scherer, K. R., & Goldsmith, H. H. (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haidt, J. (2008). Morality. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 3, 65–72.Google Scholar

Hannah, S. T., & Avolio, B. (2010). Moral potency: Building the capacity for character-based leadership. Consulting Psychology Journal, 62, 291–310.Google Scholar

Harris, K. J., Harvey, P., Harris, R. B., & Cast, M. (2013). An investigation of abusive supervision, vicarious abusive supervision, and their joint impacts. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 38–50.Google Scholar

Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride and prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3–23.Google Scholar

Hillebrandt, A., & Barclay, L. J. (2013). Angry, guilty, or proud? The effect of coworkers’ emotions on fairness perceptions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar

Hitlan, R. T., & Noel, J. (2009). The influence of workplace exclusion and personality on counterproductive work behaviours: An interactionist perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18, 477–502.Google Scholar

Jenkins, S. R., & Baird, S. (2002). Secondary traumatic stress and vicarious trauma: A validation study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 15, 423–432.Google Scholar

Jennings, P. L., Mitchell, M. S., & Hannah, S. T. (2015). The moral self: A review and integration of the literature. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, S104–S168.Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leary, M. R. (2000). Affect, cognition, and the social emotions. In Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Feeling and thinking (pp. 331–356). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observer’s reaction to the” innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210.Google Scholar

Lim, S., & Cortina, L. M. (2005). Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 483–496.Google Scholar

Lim, S., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 95–107.Google Scholar

Lutgen-Sandvik, P., Tracy, S. J., & Alberts, J. K. (2007). Burned by bullying in the American workplace: Prevalence, perception, degree and impact. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 837–862.Google Scholar

Marcus-Newhall, A., Pedersen, W. C., Carlson, M., & Miller, N. (2006). Displaced aggression is alive and well: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 670–689.Google Scholar

Mascolo, M. F., & Fischer, K. W. (1995). Developmental transformations in appraisals for pride, shame, and guilt. In Tangney, J. P. & Fischer, K. W. (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, gujilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 64–113). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Miner-Rubino, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2007). Beyond targets: consequences of vicarious exposure to misogyny at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1254–1269.Google Scholar

Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R. (2012). Beyond the consequences to the victim: The impact of abusive supervision to third party observers. In Giacalone, R. A. & Promislo, M. D. (Eds.), Handbook of unethical work behavior: Implications for well-being (pp. 23–43). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Mitchell, M. S., (2015). Third parties reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 140–156.Google Scholar

Muraven, M., Baumesiter, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1999). Longitudinal improvement of self-regulation through practice: Building self-control strength through repeated exercise. Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 446–457.Google Scholar

Nadisic, T. (2008). The Robin Hood effect: Antecedents and consequences of managers using invisible remedies to correct workplace injustice. In Gilliland, S. W., Steiner, D. D., & Skarlicki, D. P. (Eds.), Justice, morality and social responsibility (pp. 125–153). Greenwich, CT: IAP.Google Scholar

Narvaez, D., Lapsley, D., Hagele, S., & Lasky, B. (2006). Moral chronicity and social information processing: Tests of a social cognitive approach to moral personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 966–985.Google Scholar

Opotow, S. (1995). Drawing the line: Social categorization, moral exclusion, and the scope of justice. In Bunker, B. & Rubin, J. (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice (pp. 347–369). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

O’Reilly, J., & Aquino, K. (2011). A model of third parties’ morally motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 36, 526–543.Google Scholar

Pearlman, L. A., & MacIan, P. S. (1995). Vicarious traumatization: An empirical study of the effects of trauma work on trauma therapists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 558–565.Google Scholar

Pelletier, K. L. (2012). Perceptions of and reactions to leader toxicity: Do leader–follower relationships and identification with victim matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 412–424.Google Scholar

Porath, C. L., & Erez, A. (2007). Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1181–1197.Google Scholar

Porath, C. L., (2009). Overlooked but not untouched: How rudeness reduces onlookers’ performance on routine and creative tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 29–44.Google Scholar

Priesemuth, M. (2013). Stand up and speak up: Employees’ prosocial reactions to observed abusive supervision. Business & Society, 52, 649–665.Google Scholar

Priesemuth, M., & Schminke, M. (2015) Prosocial responses to supervisor mistreatment: The importance of overall justice. Paper presented at the conference of the Society for Industrial & Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Priesemuth, M., Schminke, M., Ambrose, M.L., & Folger, R. (2014). Abusive supervision climate: A multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1513–1534.Google Scholar

Raver, J. L., & Gelfand, M. J. (2005). Beyond the individual victim: Linking sexual harassment, team processes, and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 387–400.Google Scholar

Reich, T. C., & Hershcovis, M. S. (2015). Observing workplace incivility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 203–215.Google Scholar

Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572.Google Scholar

Robinson, S. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 658–672.Google Scholar

Rupp, D. E., & Bell, C. M. (2010). Extending the deontic model of justice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 89–106.Google Scholar

Ryan, A. M., & Wessel, J. L. (2012). Sexual orientation harassment in the workplace: When do observers intervene? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 488–509.Google Scholar

Salancik, G. J., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253.Google Scholar

Saporito, B. (1998). Taking a look inside Nike’s factories. Time, 151(12), 52.Google Scholar

Schat, A. C. H., Frone, M. R., & Kelloway, E. K. (2006). Prevalence of workplace aggression in the U.S. workforce: Findings from a national study. In Kelloway, E. K., Barling, J., & Hurrell, J. J. (Eds.), Handbook of workplace violence (pp. 47–89). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Schat, A. C. H., & Kelloway, E. K. (2005). Workplace violence. In Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., & Frone, M. (Eds.), Handbook of work stress (pp. 189–218). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Schmeichel, B. J., & Baumeister, R. (2004). Self-regulatory strength. In Baumeister, R. & Vohs, K. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and application (pp. 84–98). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar

Skarlicki, D. P. & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434–443.Google Scholar

Skarlicki, D. P., & Kulik, C. (2005). Third party reactions to employee mistreatment: A justice perspective. In Staw, B. & Kramer, R. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 26, pp. 183–230). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Skarlicki, D. P., Nadisic, T., Cropanzano, R., & Fortin, M. (2013). Managers as modern Robin Hoods? A multi-method investigation of situational and dispositional factors predicting managers’ allocations of invisible remedies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar

Skarlicki, D. P., & Rupp, D. E. (2010). Dual processing and organizational justice: The role of rational versus experiential processing in third party reactions to workplace mistreatment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 944–952.Google Scholar

Skarlicki, D. P., & Turner, R. A. (2014). Unfairness begets unfairness: Victim derogation bias in employee ratings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124, 34–46.Google Scholar

Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C., & Sargis, E. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 895–917.Google Scholar

Sonnentag, S., & Bayer, U. (2005). Switching off mentally: Predictors and consequences of psychological detachment from work during off-job time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 393–414.Google Scholar

Spencer, S., & Rupp, D. E. (2009). Angry, guilty, and conflicted: Injustice toward coworkers heightens emotional labor through cognitive and emotional mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 429–444.Google Scholar

Sutton, R. I. (2007). The no asshole rule. New York: Hachette Book Group.Google Scholar

Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256–1269.Google Scholar

Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.Google Scholar

Tata, J. (2000). She said, he said: The influence of remedial accounts on third party judgments of coworker sexual harassment. Journal of Management, 26, 1133–1156.Google Scholar

Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.Google Scholar

Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A., & Lambert, L. S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59, 101–123.Google Scholar

Tepper, B. J., Henle, C., Lambert, L., Giacalone, R., & Duffy, M. K. (2008). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 721–732.Google Scholar

Thau, S., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Self-gain or self-regulation impairment? Tests of competing explanations of the supervisor abuse and employee deviance relationship through perceptions of distributive justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1009–1031.Google Scholar

Treviño, L. K. (1992). The social effects of punishment in organizations: A justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 17, 647–676.Google Scholar

Turillo, C. J., Folger, R., Lavelle, J. J., Umphress, E. E., & Gee, J. O. (2002). Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 839–865.Google Scholar

Umphress, E. E., Simmons, A. L., Folger, R., Ren, R., & Bobocel, R. (2013). Observer reactions to interpersonal injustice: The roles of perpetrator intent and victim perception. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 327–349.Google Scholar

Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 184–188.Google Scholar

van Prooijen, J. W. (2006). Retributive reactions to suspected offenders: The importance of social categorizations and guilt probability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 715–726.Google Scholar

van Prooijen, J. W., & Lam, J. (2007). Retributive justice and social categorizations: The perceived fairness of punishment depends on intergroup status. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1244–1255.Google Scholar

Vartia, M. (2001). Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its targets and observers of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 27, 63–69.Google Scholar

Weiss, H., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 1–74.Google Scholar

Wheeler, A. R., Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Whitman, M. V. (2013). The interactive effects of abusive supervision and entitlement on emotional exhaustion and co-worker abuse. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 477–496.Google Scholar

Whitson, J. A., Wang, C. S., See, Y. H. M., Baker, W. E., & Murnighan, J. K. (2015). How, when, and why recipients and observers reward good deeds and punish bad deeds. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 128, 84–95.Google Scholar

Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P., & Suárez-Acosta, M. A. (2014). Employees’ reactions to peers unfair treatment by supervisors: The role of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–13.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., Grover, S. L., Bradfield, M., & Allen, D. G. (1999). The effects of negative affectivity, hierarchical status, and self-determination on workplace victimization. Academy of Management Journal, 42(3), 260–272.Google Scholar

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Burke, R. (2009a). Workaholism and relationship quality: A spillover-crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(1), 23–33.Google Scholar

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Dollard, M. F. (2008). How job demands affect partners’ experience of exhaustion: Integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 901–911.Google Scholar

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). The crossover of burnout and work engagement among working couples. Human Relations, 58(5), 661–689.Google Scholar

Bakker, A. B., Petrou, P., & Tsaousis, I. (2012). Inequity in work and intimate relationships: A spillover–crossover model. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 25(5), 491–506.Google Scholar

Bakker, A. B., Shimazu, A., Demerouti, E. E., Shimada, K., & Kawakami, N. (2014). Work engagement versus workaholism: A test of the spillover-crossover model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(1), 63–80.Google Scholar

Bakker, A. B., Westman, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). Crossover of burnout: An experimental design. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(2), 220–239.Google Scholar

Bakker, A. B., Westman, M., & van Emmerik, I. (2009b). Advancements in crossover theory. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(3), 206–219.Google Scholar

Barling, J., & MacEwen, K. E. (1992). Linking work experiences to facets of marital functioning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(6), 573–583.Google Scholar

Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effects: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675.Google Scholar

Bass, B. L., Butler, A. B., Grzywacz, J. G., & Linney, K. D. (2009). Do job demands undermine parenting? A daily analysis of spillover and crossover effects. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 58(2), 201–215.Google Scholar

Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Western, M. (2009). Who uses paid domestic labor in Australia? Choice and constraint in hiring household help. Feminist Economics, 15(1): 1–26.Google Scholar

Bazarko, D., Cate, R. A., Azocar, F., & Kreitzer, M. J. (2013). The impact of an innovative mindfulness-based stress reduction program on the health and well-being of nurses employed in a corporate setting. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 28(2), 107–133.Google Scholar

Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R., & Wethington, E. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 175–183.Google Scholar

Booth, A., & Crouter, A. C. (Eds.). (2005). The new population problem: Why families in developed countries are shrinking and what it means. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531.Google Scholar

Carlson, D. S., Ferguson, M., Kacmar, K. M., Grzywacz, J. G., & Whitten, D. (2011a). Pay it forward: The positive crossover effects of supervisor work-family enrichment. Journal of Management, 37(3), 770–789.Google Scholar

Carlson, D. S., Ferguson, M., Perrewé, P. L., & Whitten, D. (2011b). The fallout from abusive supervision: An examination of subordinates and their partners. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 937–961.Google Scholar

Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work-family interface: Development and validation of a work-family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 131–164.Google Scholar

Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). The development and validation of a multi-dimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249–176.Google Scholar

Chan, C. J., & Margolin, G. (1994). The relationship between dual-earner couples’ daily work mood and home affect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11(4), 573–586.Google Scholar

Chang, C. H., & Lyons, B. J. (2012). Not all aggressions are created equal: A multifoci approach to workplace aggression. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 79–92.Google Scholar

Cinamon, R., Weisel, A., & Tzuk, K. (2007). Work-family conflict within the family: Crossover effects, perceived parent-child interaction quality, parental self-efficacy, and life role attributions. Journal of Career Development, 34(1), 79–100.Google Scholar

Compas, B. E. (1987). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 101(3), 393–403.Google Scholar

Cowlishaw, S., Evans, L., & McLennan, J. (2010). Work-family conflict and crossover in volunteer emergency service workers. Work & Stress, 24(4), 342–358.Google Scholar

Culbertson, S., Mills, M., & Fullagar, C. (2012). Work engagement and work-family facilitation: Making homes happier through positive affective spillover. Human Relations, 65(9), 1155–1177.Google Scholar

Dasborough, M. T., Ashkanasy, N. M., Tee, E. Y. J., & Tse, H. H. M. (2009). What goes around comes around: How meso-level negative emotional contagion can ultimately determine organizational attitudes toward leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 20 (4), 571–585.Google Scholar

Day, R. D. (1995). Family-systems theory. In Day, R. D., Gilbert, K. R., Settles, B. H., & Burr, W. R. (Eds.), Research and theory in family science (pp. 91–101). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar

Demerouti, E. (2012). The spillover and crossover of resources among partners: The role of work–self and family–self facilitation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(2), 184–195.Google Scholar

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. (2005). Spillover and crossover of exhaustion and life satisfaction among dual-earner parents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 266–289.Google Scholar

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Sonnentag, S., & Fullagar, C. J. (2012). Work‐related flow and energy at work and at home: A study on the role of daily recovery. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 276–295.Google Scholar

Demsky, C. A., Ellis, A. M., & Fritz, C. (2014). Shrugging it off: Does psychological detachment from work mediate the relationship between workplace aggression and work-family conflict? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 195–205.Google Scholar

Dikkers, J. S. E., Geurts, S. A. E., Kinnunen, U., Kompier, M. A. J., & Taris, T. W. (2007). Crossover between work and home in dyadic partner relationships. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(6), 529–538.Google Scholar

Doumas, D. M., Margolin, G., & John, R. S. (2008). Spillover patterns in single-earner couples: Work, self-care, and the marital relationship. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29(1), 55–73.Google Scholar

Dunn, L. B., Iglewicz, A., & Moutier, C. (2008). A conceptual model of medical student well-being: Promoting resilience and preventing burnout. Academic Psychiatry, 32(1), 44–53.Google Scholar

Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197.Google Scholar

Edwards, J. R. (2010). Reconsidering theoretical progress in organizational and management research. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 615–619.Google Scholar

Farh, C. C., & Chen, Z. (2014). Beyond the individual victim: Multilevel consequences of abusive supervision in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, doi:10.1037/a0037636Google Scholar