4.1The F0 patterns of disyllabic words in different utterance positions.

4.2The F0 patterns of utterance-medial trisyllabic words.

4.3The F0 patterns of utterance-medial quadrisyllabic words.

4.4The F0 patterns of utterance-medial phonetic borrowings.

4.5The Left-strong prominence judgment of disyllabic words by tone, adapted from Deng (2010:63, Table 4.1).

4.6The Right-strong prominence judgment of disyllabic words by tone, adapted from Deng (2010:63, Table 4.1).

5.1Turkish dialogue slides corresponding to the constructions in (7a) and (7b).

5.2Spanish: duration of stressed and unstressed vowels in focused and non-focused positions.

5.3Spanish: mean F0 of stressed and unstressed vowels in focused and non-focused positions.

5.4Spanish: F0 contour of stressed and unstressed vowels in focused and non-focused positions.

5.5Greek: mean F0 of stressed and unstressed vowels in focused and non-focused positions.

5.6Greek: F0 contour of stressed and unstressed vowels in focused and non-focused positions.

5.7Greek: duration of stressed and unstressed vowels in focused and non-focused positions.

5.8Hungarian: mean F0 of stressed and unstressed vowels in focused and non-focused positions.

5.9Hungarian: F0 contour of stressed and unstressed vowels in focused and non-focused positions.

5.10Hungarian: duration of stressed and unstressed vowels in focused and non-focused positions (short vs. long vowels).

5.11Turkish: mean intensity of unstressed and stressed vowels in focused and non-focused positions (canonical [final] stress).

5.12Turkish: duration of unstressed and stressed vowels in focused and non-focused positions (canonical [final] stress).

5.13Turkish: mean F0 of unstressed and stressed vowels in focused and non-focused positions (canonical [final] stress).

5.14Turkish: F0 contour of unstressed and stressed vowels in focused and non-focused positions (canonical [final] stress).

7.1Success rate of random OT baseline versus OT-GLA over time.

7.2Success rate of random HG baseline versus HG-GLA over time.

7.3Average word accuracy of OT-GLA and HG-GLA over time.

9.1Original PsW (/kléto/) with stress on first syllable.

9.2Manipulated PsW (/klétó/) used in Experiment 1 with both syllables stressed.

9.3Manipulated PsW (/kleto/) used in Experiment 2 with both syllables unstressed.

9.4Percentage stress detection in 2σ PsWs in Experiment 1.

9.5Percentage stress detection in 3σ PsWs in Experiment 1.

9.6Percentage stress detection in 2σ PsWs in Experiment 2.

9.7Percentage stress detection in 3σ PsWs in Experiment 2.

9.8Percentage stress detection in 2σ PsWs in Experiment 1.

9.9Percentage stress detection in 3σ PsWs in Experiment 1.

9.10Percentage stress detection in 2σ PsWs in Experiment 2.

9.11Percentage stress detection in 3σ PsWs in Experiment 2.

9.12Percentage stress occurrence in 2σ nouns in the Lexicon (reproduced from Apostolouda 2012:50–51).

9.13Percentage stress occurrence in 3σ nouns in the Lexicon (reproduced from Apostolouda 2012:50–51).

10.1The outline of the central fixation auditory preference experiment using eye tracking.

10.2The mean TLT for all Dutch-learning infants per condition (SW vs. WS).

10.3The mean TLT per age group (4-, 6-, 8-month-olds) per condition (SW vs. WS).

10.4The distribution of individual preferences (SW, WS, or none) by age in days and per age group.

10.5The basic preference curve as described by Hunter & Ames (1988).

10.6The preference development for all three age groups plotted as the difference between the mean TLTs during the WS-condition minus the SW-condition per trial pair.