Agamben, Giorgio. State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Ahdar, Rex and Aroney, Nicholas eds. Sharia in the West. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Alesandro, John A. ‘The Revision of Church Law: Conflict and Reconciliation’ (1980) 40 The Jurist 1.Google Scholar

Al-Khalili, Jim and 55 others. ‘David Cameron Fosters Division by Calling Britain “a Christian Country”: Most Britons Are Not Christians’. Daily Telegraph 20 April 2014.Google Scholar

Anglican Communion Legal Advisers Network. Principles of Canon Law Common to the Churches of the Anglican Communion. London: Anglican Communion Office, 2008.Google Scholar

Bader, Veit. Secularism or Democracy? Associational Governance of Religious Diversity. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baines, Cynthia D. ‘L’Affaire des Foulards–Discrimination, or the Price of a Secular Public Education System’ (1996) 29 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 303.Google Scholar

Baker, John H. Collected Papers on English Legal History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, John H. The Year Books of 12–14 Henry VIII. Selden Society Vol. 119, 2002.Google Scholar

Baker, John H. and Milsom, S.F.C. Sources of English Legal History: Private Law to 1750. London: Butterworths 1986; 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Robert and Houghton, John. ‘Circular Arguments: The Status and Legitimacy of Administrative Rules’ (1986) Public Law 239.Google Scholar

Ball, Milner S. The Word and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Banaker, Reza. Merging Law and Sociology: Beyond the Dichotomies in Socio-Legal Research. Berlin/Wisconsin: Galda and Wilch Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar

Banaker, Reza and Travers, Max. ‘Introduction.’ In Banaker, Reza and Travers, Max (eds), Law and Social Theory, 2nd edn. Oxford: Hart, 2013. 1.Google Scholar

Bates, T. St John. ‘Parliament, Policy and Delegated Power’ (1986) Statute Law Review 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bausch, Kenneth C. The Emerging Consensus in Social Systems Theory. Berlin: Springer, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Ulrich. A God of One’s Own. Cambridge: Polity, 2010.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla. ‘The Return of Political Theology: The Scarf Affair in Comparative Constitutional Perspective in France, Germany and Turkey’ (2010) 36 Philosophy and Social Criticism 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernard, Antoine. La Sépulture en Droit Canonique du Décret de Gratien au Concile de Trente. Paris: Les Editions Domat-Montchrestien, 1933.Google Scholar

Berry, Duncan. ‘When Does an Instrument Made under Primary Legislation Have “Legislative Effect”?’ (1997) The Loophole 14.Google Scholar

Bhabha, Homi. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

Bliss, Frederick M. Understanding Reception: A Backdrop to Its Ecumenical Use. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Bolland, William C. A Manual of Year Book Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1925.Google Scholar

Bolland, William C. Year Books Series. Vol. XIV. Part II. Year Books of 6 Edward II 1313, Selden Society Vol. 43, 1926.Google Scholar

Bouscaren, T.L. and Ellis, A.C.. Canon Law: A Text and Commentary, 3rd edn. Milwaukee: Bruce, 1957.Google Scholar

Bradney, Anthony and Cownie, Fiona. Living without Law: An Ethnography of Quaker Decision-Making, Dispute Avoidance and Dispute Resolution. Farnham: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar

Brady, Kathleen. The Distinctiveness of Religion in American Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braidotti, Rosi. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert. ‘Heidegger’s Categories of Being and Time’ (1983) 66 The Monist 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandom, Robert ed. Rorty and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.Google Scholar

Brauch, Jeffrey A. ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence’ (1987) 3 Connecticut Journal of International Law 111.Google Scholar

Brauch, Jeffrey A. ‘The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the Rule of Law’ (2005) 11 Columbia Journal of European Law 113.Google Scholar

Browning, Don S. et al. (eds). Sex, Marriage, and Family in World Religions. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Bujo, Benezet. Foundations of an African Ethic: Beyond the Universal Claims of Western Morality. Nairobi: Paulines, 2003.Google Scholar

Cam, Helen M. Year Books Series Vol. XXVI, Part II. The Eyre of London, 14 Edward II (1321) Vol. II, Selden Society Vol. 86, 1969.Google Scholar

Cameron, David. ‘My Faith in the Church of England’. Church Times, 16 April 2014.Google Scholar

Cameron, Gregory K. ‘A Tortoise in a Hurry: The Ordering of Anglican Communion’ (2008) 8 International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lord Campbell of Alloway. ‘Codes of Practice as an Alternative to Legislation’ (1985) Statute Law Review 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carens, Joseph H. Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casanova, Jose. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casanova, Jose. ‘Public Religions Revisited’. In De Vries, Hent (ed.), Religion: Beyond the Concept. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Chiappetta, Luigi. Il Codice di Diritto Canonico, 3rd edn. EDB 2011. 3 vols II.Google Scholar

Ciprotti, Pio. ‘Qualche Punto Caratteristico della Riforma del Diritto Penale Canonico’ (1990) 46 Ephemerides Iuris Canonici 111.Google Scholar

Codling, Amy R. ‘A Critical Pluralist Analysis of R (on the application of Begum) v Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School’ (2012) 169 Law & Justice 224.Google Scholar

Codling, Amy R. ‘What Do You Believe? Taxonomy of a Subjective Legal Pluralism’. In Sandberg, Russell (ed.), Religion and Legal Pluralism. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015. 199.Google Scholar

Colloquium of Anglican and Roman Catholic Canon Lawyers. ‘A Decade of Ecumenical Dialogue on Canon Law’ (2009) 11 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colton, Paul. ‘Religion in Public Education in Ireland’. In Robbers, Gerhard (ed.), Religion in Public Education. European Consortium for Church and State Research, 2011. 227.Google Scholar

Connolly, William E. The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Cordani, A. Santangelo. La Giurispudenza Della Rota Romana Nel Secolo XIV. Milan: Giuffrè, 2001.Google Scholar

Cornille, Catherine. ‘Double Religious Belonging: Aspects and Questions’ (2003)44 Buddhist-Christian Studies. 40.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger. ‘The Representation of Law’s Autonomy in Autopoiesis Theory’. In Přibáň, Jiří and Nelken, David (eds), Law’s New Boundaries: The Consequences of Legal Autopoiesis. Farnham: Ashgate, 2001. 80.Google Scholar

Coughlin, J.J. Canon Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Cranmer, Frank. ‘Regulation within the Religious Society of Friends’ (2003) 7 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cranmer, Frank. ‘Quakers and the Campaign for Same Sex Marriage’. In Sandberg, Russell (ed.), Religion and Legal Pluralism. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015. 67.Google Scholar

Cranmer, Frank and Peterson, Scot. ‘Employment, Sex Discrimination and the Churches: The Percy Case’ (2006) 8 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cromartie, Alan. ‘The Idea of Common Law as Custom’. In Perreau-Saussine, A. and Murphy, J.B. (eds), The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Cuschieri, Andrew. The Sacrament of Reconciliation. A Theological and Canonical Treatise. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1992.Google Scholar

Cutting, Gary ed. Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Danchin, Peter. ‘Of Prophets and Proselytes: Freedom of Religion and the Conflict of Rights in International Law’ (2008) 49 Harvard International Law Journal 249.Google Scholar

Danchin, Peter. ‘Suspect Symbols: Value Pluralism as a Theory of Religious Freedom in International Law’ (2008) 33 Yale Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar

Danchin, Peter. ‘Islam in the Secular Nomos of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2011) 32(4) Michigan Journal of Political Theology 451.Google Scholar

Davies, Margaret. ‘Pluralism and Law and Religion’. In Cane, Peter, Evans, Carolyn, and Robinson, Zoe (eds), Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Davidson, Arnold I. ed. Foucault and His Interlocutors. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Dávila, María Teresa. ‘Racialization and Racism in Theological Ethics: History as a Pillar for a Catholic Ethic Grounded on the Preferential Option for the Poor and an Incarnational Anthropology’. In Keenan, James (ed.), Catholic Theological Ethics, Past, Present, and Future: The Trento Conference. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Press, 2012.Google Scholar

De Bula Baines, Cynthia. ‘L’Affaire des Foulards – Discrimination, or the Price of a Secular Public Education System’ (1996) 29 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 303.Google Scholar

DeGirolami, Marc O. The Tragedy of Religious Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Del Pozzo, Massimo. ‘Il Rapporto tra Delitto e Peccato nell’Attualità del Diritto Canonico’ (2013) 53 Ius Canonicum 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dolezalek, Gero. ‘Quaestiones motae in Rota: Richterliche Beratungsnotizen aus dem vierzehnten Jahrhundert’. In Kuttner, Stephan and Pennington, Kenneth (eds), Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Medieval Canon Law. Vatican City, 1980. 99.Google Scholar

Douglas, Gillian et al. Social Cohesion and Civil Law: Marriage, Divorce and Religious Courts. Cardiff: Cardiff University, 2011. http://www.law.cf.ac.uk/clr/research/cohesion.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, Gillian et al. ‘Religious Divorce in England and Wales: Religious Tribunals in Action’. In Shah, Prakash et al. (eds), Family, Religion, and Law: Cultural Encounters in Europe. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014. 195.Google Scholar

DuBoff, Leonard D, Burr, Sherri, and Murray, Michael D.. Art Law: Cases and Materials. New York: Aspen, 2010.Google Scholar

Durham, W. Cole Jr. and Scharffs, Brett G. Law and Religion: International, National, and Comparative Perspectives. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2010.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1986.Google Scholar

Eddy, Mary Baker. The Manual of the Mother Church – The First Church of Christ Scientist in Boston, Massachusetts. Boston, MA: Christian Science Board of Directors, 1895.Google Scholar

Erdö, Péter. Il Peccato e il Delitto. La Relazione tra Due Concetti Fondamentali alla Luce del Diritto Canonico. Giuffrè Editore, 2014. 9.Google Scholar

Espín, Orlando. ‘Intercultural Thought’. In Espín, Orlando and Nickoloff, James B. (eds), An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and Religious Studies. Glazier: Collegeville, 2007.Google Scholar

Evans, Carolyn. ‘The Islamic Scarf in the European Court of Human Rights’ (2006) 7 Melbourne Journal of International Law 52.Google Scholar

Eubel, Conradus. Hierarchia Catholica medii aevi. Regensburg: Sumptibus et typis Librariae Monasterii Regensbergianae, 1898.Google Scholar

Fabris, Adriano. TeorEtica. Filosofia della relazione. Brescia: Morcelliana, 2009.Google Scholar

Ferrari, Silvio and Cristofori, Rinaldo eds. Library of Essays on Law and Religion, 4 vols. Farnham: Ashgate, 2013.Google Scholar

Fifoot, Cecil Stuart, Herbert. History and Sources of the Common Law. London: Stevens & Sons, 1949.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. The Collected Essays of John Finnis, 5 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Firey, Abigail ed. A New History of Penance. Leiden: Brill, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flahiff, George B. ‘The Use of Prohibitions by Clerics against Ecclesiastical Courts in England’ (1941) 3 Mediaeval Studies 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fliniaux, André. ‘Les Anciennes Collections de “Decisiones Rotae Romanae” (1925) 4 Revue historique de droit français et étranger 61.Google Scholar

Foblets, Marie-Claire and Katayoun, Alidadi. ‘The RELIGARE Report’. In Foblets, Marie-Claire, Alidadi, Katayoun, Nielsen, Joergen, and Yanasmayan, Zeynep (eds), Belief, Law and Politics: What Future for a Secular Europe? Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar

Ford, David and Clemson, Frances eds. Interreligious Reading after Vatican II: Scriptural Reasoning, Comparative Theology and Receptive Ecumenism. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2013.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1972.Google Scholar

Fournier, Paul. ‘Jesselin de Cassagnes, Canoniste’ (1921) 35 Histoire littéraire de la France 348.Google Scholar

French, Rebecca et al. eds. Buddhism and Law: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Fry, T. ed. The Rule of St Benedict. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Gabel, Leona C. Benefit of Clergy in England in the Later Middle Ages. Northampton, MA: Smith College Studies in History, 1928–1929. 14.Google Scholar

Ganz, Gabriele. Quasi-Legislation: Recent Developments in Secondary Legislation. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1987.Google Scholar

Gee, Henry and Hardy, William J. Documents Illustrative of English Church History. London: Macmillan, 1896.Google Scholar

Geffré, Claude. ‘Double Belonging and the Originality of Christianity as a Religion’. In Cornille, Catherine (ed.), Many Mansions?: Multiple Religious Belonging and Christian Identity. New York: Orbis Books, 2002.Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, Sarah Barringer. The Spirit of the Law: Religious Voices and the Constitution in Modern America. Cambridge, MA: Belknap University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Green, T.J. ‘Penal Law in the Code of Canon Law and in the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches: Some Comparative Reflections’ (1994) 28 Studia Canonica 407.Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent. Private Consciences and Public Reasons. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent. Religion and Fairness, 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006–2008.Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent. Legal Interpretation: Perspectives from Other Disciplines and Private Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, XVI. ‘Mirari Vos’. In Carlen, Claudia (ed.), The Papal Encyclicals 1740–1878. Raleigh, NC: McGrath, 1981.Google Scholar

Grillmeier, Alois. ‘Konzil und Rezeption’ (1970) 45 Theologie und Philosophie 321.Google Scholar

Guy, John Alexander. Christopher St German on Chancery and Statute. Selden Society Supplementary Series, 1985.Google Scholar

Hamburger, Philip. Law and Judicial Duty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanegraaff, Wouter J. ‘Defining Religion in Spite of History’. In Platvoet, Jan G. and Molendijk, Arie L. (eds), The Pragmatics of Defining Religion. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar

Hayes, Christine ed. Judaism and Law: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Heelas, Paul and Woodhead, Linda. The Spiritual Revolution. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.Google Scholar

Helmholz, Richard H. Canon Law and the Law of England. London: Hambledon Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Helmholz, Richard H. Natural Law in Court: A History of Legal Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Hemnant, Mary. Select Cases in the Exchequer Chamber 51 Selden Society, Selden Society Vol. 51, 1933.Google Scholar

Hemnant, Mary. Select Cases in the Exchequer Chamber. Before All the Justices of England. Vol. II 1461–1509 64. Selden Society, Vol. 64, 1945.Google Scholar

Hill, Mark ed. Faithful Discipleship: Clergy Discipline in Anglican and Roman Catholic Canon Law. Rome: Pontifical University of St Thomas Aquinas, 2001.Google Scholar

Hill, Mark. Ecclesiastical Law, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hill, Mark. ‘Religious Symbolism and Conscientious Objection in the Workplace’ (2013) 15 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Mark, Sandberg, Russell and Doe, Norman. Religion and Law in the United Kingdom, 2nd edn. Kluwer Law International, 2014.Google Scholar

Hogan, Gerard and Morgan, David Gwynn. Administrative Law in Ireland, 4th edn. Dublin: Round Hall Thomson Reuters, 2010.Google Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell. In Collected Legal Papers. New York: Brace and Howe, 1920.Google Scholar

Horwitz, Paul. The Agnostic Age: Law, Religion, and the Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Hostiensis (Henry of Susa, c. 1200–71). Lectura in libros Decretalium. Venice: Iuntas 1581, reprinted Turin: Bottega d’Erasmo, 1965.Google Scholar

Hostensis. Summa Aurea. Venice, 1574.Google Scholar

Hostensis. Lectura in Libros Decretalium. Venice, 1581.Google Scholar

House of Commons Public Administration Committee. Work of the Charity Commission in 2008–09: Oral Evidence given by Dame Suzi Leather, Chair, and Andrew Hind, Chief Executive, Charity Commission (HC 109-I of Session 2009–10). London: TSO, 2010.Google Scholar

Hughes, Phillip. The Reformation of England, 5th edn. London: Burns & Oates, 1963.Google Scholar

Innocent, IV. Commentaria in libros Decretalium. Venice, 1570.Google Scholar

Inter-Anglican Standing Committee on Unity, Faith and Order. The Anglican Communion Covenant: A Study Guide. London: Anglican Communion Office, 2011.Google Scholar

Jeremy, Anthony W. ‘Pacta Sunt Servanda: The Influence of Canon Law upon the Development of Contractual Obligations’ (2000) 144 Law & Justice 4.Google Scholar

Paul, John II. ‘Reconciliatio et Paenitentia’ (1985) 77 Acta Apostolicae Sedis 185.Google Scholar

Paul, John II. Catechism of the Catholic Church, rev edn. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1999. 1466.Google Scholar

Joint Committee of the Convocation of Canterbury. The Position of the Laity in Church. London: SPCK, 1902.Google Scholar

Joppke, Christian. ‘Double Standards? Veils and Crucifixes in the European Legal Order’ (2013) 54 European Journal of Sociology 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalanges, Kristine. Religious Liberty in Western and Islamic Law: Toward a World Legal Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenny, Celia G. ‘“Not to Compel but to Conjure”: The Bible and Pluralism’ (2013) Search: A Church of Ireland Journal 187.Google Scholar

Kenny, Celia G. ‘Public Space, Private Face; Veiling as a Challenge for Legal Reasoning’. In Sandberg, Russell (ed.), Religion and Legal Pluralism. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2015. 213.Google Scholar

King, Michael. ‘The Muslim Identity in a Secular World’. In King, Michael (ed.), God’s Law versus State Law. Ithaca, NY: Great Seal, 1995. 91.Google Scholar

King, Michael. ‘The Radical Sociology of Niklas Luhmann’. In Banaker, Reza and Travers, Max (eds), Law and Social Theory, 2nd edn. Oxford: Hart, 2013. 59.Google Scholar

King, Michael and Thornhill, Chris. Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Politics and Law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleinhans, Martha-Marie and Macdonald, Roderick A. ‘What Is a Critical Legal Pluralism?’ (1997) 12(2) Canadian Journal of International Law and Society 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knafla, Louis A. ‘Conscience in the English Common Law Tradition’ (1976) 26 University of Toronto Law Journal 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knights, Samantha. Freedom of Religion, Minorities and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Knitter, Paul F. Without Buddha I Could Not Be a Christian. Oxford: One World, 2009.Google Scholar

Koppelman, Andrew. Defending American Religious Neutrality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Krishnaswami, Arcot. Study of Discrimination in the Matter of Religious Rights and Practices. New York: UN, 1960.Google Scholar

Laermans, Rudi and Verschraegen, Gert. ‘“The Late Niklas Luhmann” on Religion’ (2001) 48(1) Social Compass 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambeth Commission on Communion. The Windsor Report. London: Anglican Communion Office, 2004.Google Scholar

Landau, P. Ius Patronatus. Cologne, 1975.Google Scholar

Law Commission, Offences against Religion and Public Worship, PWP No 79, HMSO. 1981.Google Scholar

Law Commission, Offences against Religion and Public Worship, Law Com No 145, HMSO. 1984.Google Scholar

Lawrence, David. The Care of Stained Glass. Dublin: The Heritage Council, Nd.Google Scholar

Laws, John G. McK. The Common Law Constitution: The Hamlyn Lectures 2013. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laycock, Douglas. Religious Liberty, 4 vols. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar

Lee, Natalie. ‘Case Comment: Child Benefit – Share Care of Two Children’ (2006) 13(2) Journal of Social Security Law 119.Google Scholar

Lerner, Natan. Religion, Secular Beliefs and Human Rights: 25 Years after the Human Rights Declaration. Leiden, MD: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Le Sueur, Andrew. ‘Taking the Soft Option? The Duty to Give Reasons in the Draft Freedom of Information Bill’ (1999) Public Law 419.Google Scholar

Letsas, George. ‘Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation’ (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Tom. ‘What Not to Wear: Religious Rights, the European Court, and the Margin of Appreciation’ (2007) 56 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindholm, Tore, Durham, W. Cole Jr., and Tahzib-Lie, Bahia G. Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Brill, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lubin, Timothy, Davis, Donald R, and Krishnan, Jayanth K. eds. Hinduism and Law: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. The Differentiation of Society. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. A Sociological Theory of Law, 2nd edn. London: Routledge, 1983/2014.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993/2004.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. Introduction to Systems Theory. Cambridge: Polity, 2002/2013.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine A. Towards a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine A. Feminism Unmodified: Discourse on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Macnair, Mike. ‘Equity and Conscience’ (2007) 27 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maitland, Frederic. W. ed. Year Books of Edward II. Volume 1.1 and 2 Edward II. 1307–1309. Selden Society Vol. 17, 1903.Google Scholar

Maitland, Frederic. W. The Forms of Action at Common Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965/1909.Google Scholar

Malik, Maleiha. Minority Legal Orders in the UK. London: The British Academy, 2012.Google Scholar

Mancini, Susanna. ‘The Power of Symbols and Symbols as Power: Secularism and Religion as Guarantors of Cultural Convergence’ (2008) 30 Cardozo Law Review 2629.Google Scholar

Mancini, Susanna and Rosenfeld, Michael. ‘Introduction’. In Mancini, Susanna and Rosenfeld, Michael (eds), Constitutional Secularism in an Age of Religious Revival. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markham, Ian et al. eds. The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to the Anglican Communion. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, Jill. ‘Freedom of Religious Expression and Gender Equality: Sahin v Turkey’ (2006) 69 Modern Law Review 452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McConnell, Michael W., Cochran, Robert F, and Carmella, Angela eds. Christian Perspectives on Legal Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

McConnell, Michael W., Garvey, John H, and Berg, Thomas C. Religion and the Constitution, 2nd edn. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2006.Google Scholar

McEwan, Ian. The Children Act. London: Jonathan Cape, 2014.Google Scholar

McGavin, Anne C. ‘The Distribution of Legislative Power within the Scottish Episcopal Church’. Unpublished LLM dissertation. University of Wales: Cardiff, 1997.Google Scholar

McGrade, Arthur S. and Hooker, Richard. Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity: A Critical Edition with Modern Spelling. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

McGuckin, John A. The Ascent of Christian Law: Patristic and Byzantine Reformulations. New York: SVS Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Megarry, Robert E. ‘Administrative Quasi-Legislation’ (1944) 60 Law Quarterly Review 125.Google Scholar

Milsom, S.F.C. Historical Foundations of the Common Law, 2nd edn. London: Butterworths, 1981.Google Scholar

Misak, Cheryl. Truth, Politics, Morality. London: Routledge, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Molineaux, N.B. Medici et Medicamenta: The Medicine of Penance in Late Antiquity. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2009.Google Scholar

Mollat, Guillaume. La Collation des Bénéfices Ecclésiastiques Sous les Papes d’Avignon. Paris: Boccard, 1920.Google Scholar

Moore, E. Garth and Briden, Timothy. Moore’s Introduction to English Canon Law, 2nd edn. London: Mowbray, 1985.Google Scholar

Mynors, Roger A.B. and Thomson, Rodney M. Catalogue of the Manuscripts of Hereford Cathedral Library. Woodbridge, 1993.Google Scholar

Nancy, Jean-Luc. Être Singulier Pluriel. Paris: Galilée, 1996.Google Scholar

National Centre for Social Research. British Social Attitudes No 28 [31], London, 2011.Google Scholar

Nazir-Ali, Michael. ‘The Legal Threat to Our Spiritual Tradition’. Daily Telegraph, 30 April 2010.Google Scholar

Nedungatt, George ed. A Guide to the Eastern Code. Rome: Pontificio Istituto Orientale, 2002.Google Scholar

Neilson, Nellie. Year Books Series: Year Books of 10 Edward IV and 49 Henry VI 1470. Selden Society Vol. 4, 1930.Google Scholar

Nichols, Joel A. ed. Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage and the Boundaries of Civil Law and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Nobles, Richard and Schiff, David. ‘Using Systems Theory to Understand Legal Pluralism: What Could Be Gained?’ 46(2) (2012) Law and Society Review 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Non-Subscribing Presbyterian of Church of Ireland. The Constitution and Code of Discipline. Belfast: Non-Subscribing Presbyterian of Church of Ireland Synod, 1997.Google Scholar

Noonan, John T. Jr. ‘Development in Moral Doctrine’. In Keenan, James F. and Shannon, Thomas A. (eds), The Context of Casuistry. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Novak, David. ‘Natural Law and Judaism’. In Emon, Anver M., Levering, Matthew, and Novak, David (eds), Natural Law. A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Trialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Novak, Davie, Emen, Anver M, and Levering, Matthew. Natural Law: A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Trialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha. The New Religious Intolerance: Overcoming the Politics of Fear. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University, 2012.Google Scholar

O’Halloran, Kerry. Religion, Charity, and Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ombres, Robert. ‘Why Then the Law?’ (1974) New Blackfriars 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ombres, Robert. ‘Justice and Equity in the 1983 Code’ (1998) 96/97Law & Justice 23.Google Scholar

Orobator, Agbonkhiameghe. Theology Brewed in an African Pot. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2008.Google Scholar

Örsy, Ladislas. ‘Models of Approach to Canon Law and Their Impact on Interpretation’ (1990) The Jurist 50.Google Scholar

Örsy, Ladislas. Theology and Canon Law: New Horizons for Legislation and Interpretation. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Örsy, Ladislas. Receiving the Council: Theological and Canonical Insights and Debates. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Parekh, Bhikhu. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pavisic, David Albornoz. I Diritti Nativi della Chiesa. Rome: LAS, 2008.Google Scholar

Pelikan, Jaroslav. Interpreting the Bible and the Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennington, Kenneth. ‘The Canonists and Pluralism in the Thirteenth Century’ (1976) 51 Speculum 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, John. The Pretenses of Loyalty: Locke, Liberal Theory, and the American Political Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Perry, Michael J. Under God? Religious Faith and Liberal Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, Michael J. The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Paul, VI. Ordo Paenitentiae. Vatican City: Vatican Polyglot Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Percy, Helen. Scandalous, Immoral and Improper – The Trial of Helen Percy. Glendaruel: Argyll Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar

Perkins, John. A Profitable Booke of Master John Perkins, Fellowe of the Inner Temple. Treating of the Lawes of Englande. 1528.Google Scholar

Phan, Peter. ‘Multiple Religious Belonging: Opportunities and Challenges for Theology and Church’ (2003) 64 Theological Studies 496–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillimore, Robert. The Ecclesiastical Law of the Church of England, 2nd edn. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1895.Google Scholar

Plongeron, Bernard. ‘Anathema or Dialogue? Christian Reactions to the Declarations of the Rights of Man in the United States and Europe in the Eighteenth Century’. In Muller, Alois and Greinacher, Norbert (eds), The Church and the Rights of Man, Concilium 1979, 1, 39.Google Scholar

Plucknett, Theodore and Barton, John eds. Christopher St German: Doctor and Student, First Dialogue. Selden Society Vol. 91, 1974.Google Scholar

Pontifical Council for the Promotion of the Unity of Christians. Directory for the Application of Principles and Norms on Ecumenism. London: Catholic Truth Society, 1993.Google Scholar

Poschmann, Bernhard. Penance and the Anointing of the Sick. New York: Herder & Herder, 1964.Google Scholar

Přibáň, Jiří. ‘[Review of] Niklas Luhmann: Law, Justice, Society by Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos’ (2010) 73 Modern Law Review 893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pui-Lan, Kwok. Postcolonial Imagination & Feminist Theology. London: SCM Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Puza, Richard and Doe, Norman eds. Religion and Law in Dialogue: Covenantal and Non-Covenantal Cooperation between State and Religion in Europe. Leuven: Peeters, 2006.Google Scholar

Radin, Max. ‘The Conscience of the Court’ 48 (1932) Law Quarterly Review 506.Google Scholar

Rawlings, Richard. ‘Concordats of the Constitution’ (2000) 116 Law Quarterly Review 257.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. The Law of Peoples: The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Renucci, Jean-Francois. Article 9 of the European Convention of Human Rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2005 (Human Rights Files, no. 20).Google Scholar

Robbins, Jeffrey W. ed. John D Caputo and Gianni Vattimo: After the Death of God. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Rodes, Robert E. Jr. Lay Authority and Reformation in the English Church: Edward I to the Civil War. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Lord Rodger of Earlsferry. The Courts, the Church and the Constitution: Aspects of the Disruption of 1843. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Ronchi, Paolo. ‘Crucifixes, Margin of Appreciation and Consensus: The Grand Chamber Ruling in Lautsi v Italy’ (2011) 13 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, Richard. Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard. Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rusch, William G. Ecumenical Reception: Its Challenge and Opportunity. Grand Rapids/Cambridge: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007.Google Scholar

Ruyssen, Georges ed. La Disciplina della Penitenza nelle Chiese Orientali. Rome: Pontificio Istituto Orientale, 2013.Google Scholar

Samuels, Alec. ‘Codes of Practice and Legislation’ (1986) 29 Statute Law Review 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandberg, Russell. ‘Church–State Relations in Europe: From Legal Models to an Interdisciplinary Approach’ (2008) 1 Journal of Religion in Europe 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandberg, Russell. Law and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandberg, Russell. ‘[Review of] Norman Doe, Law and Religion in Europe’ (2012) 75 Modern Law Review 690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandberg, Russell. ‘Defining the Divine’ (2014) 16 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandberg, Russell. Religion, Law and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandberg, Russell ed. Religion and Legal Pluralism. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar

Sandberg, Russell et al. ‘Britain’s Religious Tribunals: “Joint Governance” in Practice’ (2013) 33 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Santangelo, Cordani A. La giurisprudenza della Rota Romana nel secolo XIV. Milan: A. Giuffré, 2001.Google Scholar

Schmidt-Leukel, Perry. ‘Uniqueness: A Pluralistic Reading of John 14:6’. In O’ Grady, John and Scherle, Peter (eds), Ecumenics from the Rim: Explorations in Honour of John D’Arcy May. Berlin: LIT Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar

Seipp, David J. ‘The Reception of Canon Law and Civil Law in the Common Law Courts before 1660’ (1993) 13 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seipp, David J. ‘Trust and Fiduciary Duty in the Early Common Law’ (2011) 91 Boston University Law Review 1011.Google Scholar

Shah, Prakash et al. eds. Family, Religion, and Law: Cultural Encounters in Europe. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar

Simpson, A.W.B. History of the Common Law of Contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Skonieczny, Piotr. ‘La Presunzione dell’Imputabilità (can.132 §3 CIC/83): Commento ad un Disposto da Abrogare’ (2013) 90 Angelicum 391.Google Scholar

Smith, Stephen Douglas. The Rise and Decline of American Religious Freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Steven D. The Disenchantment of Secular Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sohm, Rudolf. Kirchenrecht. Leipzig: Dunker & Humblot, 1892.Google Scholar

Solanki, Gopika. Adjudication in Religious Family Laws: Cultural Accommodation, Legal Pluralism, and Gender Equality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solt, Leo. Church and State in Early Modern England, 1509–1640. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Somerville, R. and Brasington, B.C. Prefaces to Canon Law Books in Latin Christianity: Selected Translations, 500–1245. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spielmann, Dean. ‘Whither the Margin of Appreciation?’ (2014) 67 Current Legal Problems 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stubbs, William. Select Charters and Other Illustrations of English Constitutional History, 9th edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1913.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers. The Impossibility of Religious Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Swanson, Robert N. Church and Society in Late Medieval England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Swanson, Robert N. ‘A Canon Lawyer’s Compilation from Fifteenth-Century Yorkshire’ (2012) 69 Journal of Ecclesiastical History 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tamanaha, Brian Z. Realistic Socio-Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, Brian Z. A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanner, Norman P. ed. Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, 2 vols. London: Sheed & Ward, 1990.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

The Canon Law of the Church of England – The Report of the Archbishops’ Commission on Canon Law. London: SPCK, 1947.Google Scholar

Tierney, Brian. The Crisis of Church and State 1050–1300. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, 1964.Google Scholar

Tierney, Brian. ‘“Only Truth Has Authority”: The Problem of “Reception” in the Decretists and in Johannes de Turrecremata’. In Pennington, Kenneth and Somerville, Robert (eds), Law, Church, and Society: Essays in Honor of Stephan Kuttner. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1977 69.Google Scholar

Ullmann, Walter. Medieval Papalism. London, 1949.Google Scholar

Ullmann, Walter. ‘A Decision of the Rota Romana on the Benefit of Clergy in England’ (1967) 13 Studia Gratiana 455.Google Scholar

Van Drunen, David. Natural Law and the Two Kingdoms: A Study in the Development of Reformed Social Thought. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar

Van der Ven, Johannes A. Human Rights or Religious Rules? Leiden: Brill, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vattimo, Gianni and Rovatti, Pier Aldo eds. Carravetta, Peter, trans. Weak Thought. New York: Suny Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Vinogradoff, Paul. ‘Reason and Conscience in 16th Century Jurisprudence’ (1908) 24 Law Quarterly Review 379.Google Scholar

Vischer, Robert K. Conscience and the Common Good: Reclaiming the Space between the Individual and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Walker, David M. The Scottish Legal System, 6th edn. Edinburgh: W. S. Green, 1992.Google Scholar

Wambaugh, Eugene ed. Littleton’s Tenures. Washington, DC: John Byrne & Co., 1903.Google Scholar

Warren, W.L. ‘A Reappraisal of Simon of Sudbury’ (1959) 10 Journal of Ecclesiastical History 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watt, John A. Theory of Papal Monarchy in the Thirteenth Century. New York: Fordham University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Weatherhead, James L. The Constitution and Laws of the Church of Scotland. Edinburgh: Church of Scotland Board of Practice and Procedure, 1997.Google Scholar

Welker, Michael and Etzelmüller, Gregor eds. Concepts of Law in the Sciences, Legal Studies, and Theology. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.Google Scholar

Weller, Paul, Purdam, Kingsley, Ghanea, Nizala, and Cheruvallil-Contractor, Sariya. Religion or Belief, Discrimination and Equality. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar

Williams, David G.T. ‘Statute Law and Administrative Law’ (1984) Statute Law Review 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Rowan. ‘Civil and Religious Law in England – A Religious Perspective’ (2008) 10 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witte Jr, John. ‘The Study of Law and Religion in the United States: An Interim Report’ (2012) 14 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witte Jr, John. ‘The Covenant of Marriage: Its Biblical Roots, Historical Influence, and Modern Uses’ (2012) 18 Review on Marriage and Spirituality 147.Google Scholar

Witte Jr, John. The Western Case for Monogamy over Polygamy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witte Jr, John. and Alexander, Frank S. eds. Christianity and Law: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Witte Jr, John. and Alexander, Frank S. eds. Christianity and Human Rights: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Witte Jr, John. and Green, M. Christian eds. Religion and Human Rights: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witte Jr, John. and Nichols, Joel A. Religion and the American Constitutional Experiment, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Wright, J. Robert. The Church and the English Crown 1305–1334. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1980.Google Scholar

Yourow, Howard C. ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence’ (1987) 3 Connecticut Journal of International Law 111.Google Scholar

Zander, Michael. The Law Making Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar