Part II - New Logics in the Relations of Legal Orders
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 January 2017
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Law and the New Logics , pp. 87 - 196Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
Alexy, R., Theorie der juristischen Argumentation, 7th edn Auflage, Frankfurt a/M: Suhrkamp, 1983.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Glenn, Patrick, Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law, 5th edn (1st edn 2000), Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014.Google Scholar
Gordon, Th. F., The Pleadings Game. An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice, Dordrecht: Kluwer 1995.Google Scholar
Hage, Jaap, Construction or reconstruction? On the function of argumentation in the law, in Dahlman, C. and Feteris, E. (eds.), Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer 2012, 125–144.Google Scholar
Hage, Jaap, Three kinds of coherentism in Araszkiewicz, Michal and Šavelka, Jaromir (eds.), Coherence: Insights from Philosophy, Jurisprudence and Artificial Intelligence, Dordrecht: Springer 2013, 1–32.Google Scholar
Hage, Jaap, The justification of value judgments. Theoretical foundations for arguments about the best level to regulate European Private Law, in Akkermans, Bram, Hage, Jaap, Kornet, Nicole and Smits, Jan (eds.), Who Does What? On the Allocation of Regulatory Competences in European Private Law, Cambridge: Intersentia 2015, 15–56.Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert L. A., The Concept of Law, 3rd edn, (1st edn 1961). Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, A. and Hassemer, W. (eds.), Einführung in Rechtsfilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart, 1st edn, Heidelberg: Müller 1977.Google Scholar
Lodder, Arno, DiaLaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation, Dordrecht: Kluwer 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakken, Henry, Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law, Dordrecht: Kluwer 1997.Google Scholar
Sartor, G., Legal Reasoning, A Cognitive Approach to the Law, Dordrecht: Springer 2005.Google Scholar
Verheij, Bart, Rules, Reasons, Arguments. Formal Studies of Argumentation and Defeat, Dissertation, University of Maastricht 1996.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (1983).Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael, Fang, Songyin & Zürcher, Christopher, Compromised Peacebuilding, 58 Int’l St. Q. 608 (2014).Google Scholar
Bell, Christine On the Law of Peace: Peace Agreements and the Lex Pacificatoria (2008).Google Scholar
Bell, Christine Text and Context: Evaluating Peace Agreements for their ‘Gender Perspective’. Political Settlements Research Programme, Research Paper 1, 2015.Google Scholar
Bell, Christine & O’Rourke, Catherine, The People’s Peace? Peace Agreements and Participatory Democracy, 28 Int’l. Pol. Sci Rev 293 (2007).Google Scholar
Boege, Volker et al. On Hybrid Political Orders and Failing States: What is Failing? States in the South or Research and Politics in the West?, 8 Berghof Handbook for Conflict Transformation 15 (2008), www.berghof-handbook.net/dialogue-series/no.-8-building-peace-in-the-absence-of-states.Google Scholar
Boege, Volker, Brown, Anne, Clements, Kevin & Nolan, Anna, Building Peace and Political Community in Hybrid Political Orders, 16 Int. Peacekeeping 599–615 (2009).Google Scholar
Eide, Asbjørn, Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Acheivements in International Law During the Lawt Quarter of a Century, 37 Netherlands Yearbook of Int’l Law 155–212 (2006).Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance, 86 Am.J. Int’l L. 46 (1992).Google Scholar
Fox, Gregory H. The Right to Political Participation in International Law, 17 Y.J. Int’l. L 539 (1992).Google Scholar
Fox, Gregory H. & Roth, Brad, Introduction: The Spread of Liberal Democracy and its Implications for International Law in Gregory H. Fox & Brad Roth (eds). Democratic governance and International Law (2000)Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., & Sikkink, Katherine Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (1998).Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, The Right to be Taken Seriously: Self-Determination in International Law, 28 Hum. Rts. Q. 186 (2006).Google Scholar
Koskienniemi, Martti, National Self-determination Today: Problems of Legal Theory and Practice, 24 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 241 (1994).Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will, Multicutural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will The Internationalization of Minority Rights, 6 Eur. J. Int’l L. Const. L., 1 (2008).Google Scholar
Mac Ginty, Roger, Hybrid Peace: The Interaction between Top Down and Bottom Up Peace, 41 Sec. Dialogue 391 (2010).Google Scholar
McGarry, John & O’Leary, Brendan, The Northern Ireland Conflict: Consociational Engagements (2004).Google Scholar
Tierney, Stephen, We the Peoples: Balancing Constituent Power and Constitutionalism in Plurinational States in Neil Walker & Martin Loughlin (eds) The Paradox of Constitutionalism 229 (2007).Google Scholar
Tourme-Jouannet, Emanuelle, The International Law of Recognition, 24 Eur. INT’L J. Const. L. 667 (2013).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, Precommitment and Disagreement in L. Alexander (ed) Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations 271 (1998).Google Scholar
Walker, Neil, Beyond Secession? Law in the Framing of the National Polity in Stephen Tierney (ed) Nationalism and Globalisation: New Settings New Challenges 155 (2015).Google Scholar
Weller, Marc, Settling Self-determination Conflicts: Recent Developments, 20 Eur. J. Int’l L. 112 (2009).Google Scholar
Wheatley, Steven, Modelling Democratic Secession in International Law in Stephen Tierney (ed) Nationalism and Globalisation: New Settings New Challenges 127 (2015).Google Scholar
References
Australian Law Reform Commission (1986), Recognition of Customary Laws, www.alrc.gov.au/publications/report-31.Google Scholar
Baker, J. H. (2002), An Introduction to English Legal History, 4th edition, London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Brown, B., and Priest, G. (2004), Chunk and Permeate I: The Infinitesimal Calculus, Journal of Philosophical Logic 33: 379–388.Google Scholar
Brown, B., and Priest, G. (2015), Chunk and Permeate II: Bohr’s Hydrogen Atom, European Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5: 297–314.Google Scholar
Davis, M., Bell, A., and Brererton, P. (2014), Nygh’s Conflict of Laws in Australia, 9th edn, Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths.Google Scholar
Glenn, H. P. (2014), Legal Traditions of the World, 5th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haack, S. (2007), On Logic in the Law: “Something, but not All”, Ratio Juris 20: 1–31.Google Scholar
MacAdam, A., and Pyke, J. (1998), Judicial Reasoning and the Doctrine of Precedent in Australia, Sydney, NSW: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Priest, G. (2002), Paraconsistent Logic, pp. 287–393, Vol. 6, of Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F. (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Priest, G. (2008a), Jaina Logic: a Contemporary Perspective, History and Philosophy of Logic 29: 263–278.Google Scholar
Priest, G. (2008b), Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Priest, G. (2014), Logical Pluralism: Another Application of Chunk and Permeate, Erkenntnis 29: 331–338.Google Scholar