Language and Literature

doi:10.1017/9781316337936.028

26 - Language and Literature

from Part III - SFL in Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 May 2019

Edited by

Lise Fontaine and

Geoff Thompson: Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Wendy L. Bowcher: Affiliation:
Sun Yat-Sen University, China
Lise Fontaine: Affiliation:
Cardiff University
David Schönthal: Affiliation:
Cardiff University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter begins with the SFL take on language in literature, putting forward Hasan’s definition of ‘verbal art’ and her ‘double-articulation’ descriptive and analytical model (1989; 2007). Immediately emphasized is that, in contrast to mainstream stylistics (e.g. Simpson 2014), Hasan’s Systemic Socio-Semantic Stylistics (SSS) upholds literature as a ‘special’ text type, one requiring an equally ‘special’ theoretical-analytical framework. In Section 2 central inspirations of the model are mapped out. SSS “[…] predates the 1960s’ structural stylistics” (Hasan 2007:21), indeed going back to the Russian Formalists and Prague Circle scholars. Especially vital for its modelling is Mukařovský’s notion of ‘foregrounding’ (1977, 1978), but the case for slotting Jakobson into the framework (e.g., Miller 2016a) is also argued. Among remarks on other stylisticians, particular attention is fittingly drawn to Halliday’s crucial, and complementary, role in SSS ‘history’. A sample illustration of verbal art analysis with D. H. Lawrence’s ‘Lonely, Lonesome, Loney – O!’ follows in Section 3, while Section 4 briefly notes select recent research within SFL, and points to some possible future directions, also pondering the supporting role played by CL methods in exploring the language in literature texts (e.g., Miller and Luporini 2015, 2018).

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics , pp. 690 - 714

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936.028 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Banks, D. 2011. Comprendre l’incompréhensible: analyse d’un poème de J. H. Prynne. In Banks, D., ed., Aspects linguistiques du texte poétique. Paris: L’Harmattan. 219–29.Google Scholar

Bednarek, M. 2008. Teaching English Literature and Linguistics Using Corpus Stylistic Methods. In Bridging Discourses: ASFLA 2007 Online Proceedings. Available online at: www.asfla.org.au/category/asfla2007. (Last accessed 06/05/2015.)Google Scholar

Busse, B. and McIntyre, D.. 2010. Language, Literature and Stylistics. In McIntyre, D. and Busse, B., eds., Language and Style. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 3–14.Google Scholar

Butler, C. 2003. Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-functional Theories, Part 2: From Clause to Discourse and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Butt, D. 1988. Randomness, Order and the Latent Patterning of Text. In Birch, D. and O’Toole, M., eds., Functions of Style. London: Pinter. 74–97.Google Scholar

Butt, D. and Lukin, A.. 2009. Stylistic Analysis and Arguments against Randomness. In Halliday, M. A. K. and Webster, J. J., eds., Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum. 190–215.Google Scholar

Caton, S. C. 1987. Contributions of Roman Jakobson. Annual Review of Anthropology 16: 223–60.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. and Davies, D.. 1969. Investigating English Style. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Enkvist, N. E. 1973. Linguistic Stylistics. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. 1992. Corpus Linguistics or Computer-aided Armchair Linguistics. In Svartvik, J., ed., Directions in Corpus Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 13–38.Google Scholar

Fowler, R., ed. 1966. Essays on Style and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. 1981. Literature as Social Discourse: The Practice of Linguistic Criticism. London: Batsford.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. 1986. Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. and Bateson, F. W.. 1967. Argument II: Literature and Linguistics. Essays in Criticism 17: 322–47.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. and Bateson, F. W.. 1968. Argument II (continued): Language and Literature. Essays in Criticism 18: 164–82.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 2002a. The De-Automatization of Grammar: From Priestley’s ‘An Inspector Calls’. In Webster, J. J., ed., The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Volume 2: Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse. London: Continuum. 126–48.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 2002b. Linguistic Function and Literary Style: An Inquiry into the Language of William Golding’s The Inheritors. In Webster, J. J., ed., The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Volume 2: Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse. London: Continuum. 88–125.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., MacIntosh, A., and Strevens, P.. 1964. The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Hasan, R. 1964. A Linguistic Study of Contrasting Linguistic Features in the Style of Two Contemporary English Prose Writers. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Hasan, R. 1971. Rime and Reason in Literature. In Chatman, S., ed., Literary Style: A Symposium. London: Oxford University Press. 299–329.Google Scholar

Hasan, R. 1975. The Place of Stylistics in the Study of Verbal Art. In Ringbom, H., ed., Style and Text. Amsterdam: Skriptor. 49–62.Google Scholar

Hasan, R. 1989. Linguistics, Language and Verbal Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hasan, R. 1996. Teaching Literature across Cultures. In James, J. E., ed., The Language–Culture Connection. Singapore: SEAMO Regional Language Centre. 34–63.Google Scholar

Hasan, R. 2007. Private Pleasure, Public Discourse: Reflections on Engaging with Literature. In Miller, D. R. and Turci, M., eds., Language and Verbal Art Revisited: Linguistic Approaches to the Study of Literature. Sheffield: Equinox. 41–67.Google Scholar

Hatzfeld, H. A. 1953. A Critical Bibliography of the New Stylistics Applied to the Romance Literatures, 1900–1952. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. 1960. Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics. In Sebeok, T. A., ed., Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 350–77.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. 1966. Grammatical Parallelism and Its Russian Facet. Language 42(2): 399–429.Google Scholar

Lawrence, D. H. 1932. Last Poems. Florence: Giuseppe Orioli.Google Scholar

Lawrence, D. H. 1968. Foreword to Women in Love. In Roberts, W. and Moore, H. T., eds., Phoenix II: Unpublished and other Prose Works by D.H. Lawrence. London: Heinemann. 275–6.Google Scholar

Lecercle, J. 1993. The Current State of Stylistics. The European English Messenger 2(1): 14–18.Google Scholar

Leech, G. N. and Short, M. H.. 2007. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Lukin, A. 2015. A Linguistics of Style: Halliday on Literature. In Webster, J. J., ed., The Bloomsbury Companion to M. A. K. Halliday. London: Bloomsbury. 348–69.Google Scholar

Lukin, A. and Pagano, A.. 2012. Context and Double Articulation in the Translation of Verbal Art. In Knox, J., ed., To Boldly Proceed, Selected Proceedings from the 39th International Systemic Functional Linguistics Congress. Sydney: UTS. 123–8.Google Scholar

Lukin, A. and Webster, J. J.. 2005. Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Study of Literature. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Webster, J. J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective. Sheffield: Equinox. 413–56.Google Scholar

Luporini, A. 2016. Spotlighting Fantasy Literature with the Tools of Frame Semantics and Systemic Functional Linguistics: A Case Study. Quaderni del CeSLiC: Occasional Papers. Bologna: Centro di Studi Linguistico-Culturali (CeSLiC) e Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna. ALMADL – Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali. DOI: 10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5162.Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. 1923. The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages. In Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A., eds., The Meaning of Meaning. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. 1935. Coral Gardens and Their Magic. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Manfredi, M. 2012 Description vs Prescription in Translation Teaching: A Bridgeable Gulf? In Dalziel, F., Gesuato, S., and Musacchio, M. T., eds., A Lifetime of English Studies. Essays in Honour of Carol Taylor Torsello. Padua: Il Poligrafo. 545–53.Google Scholar

Manfredi, M. 2014. Translating Text and Context: Translation Studies and Systemic Functional Linguistics, Volume 2: From Theory to Practice. 2nd ed. Bologna: Asterisco.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. 1986. Grammaticalising Ecology: The Politics of Baby Seals and Kangaroos. In Threadgold, T., Grosz, E. A., Kress, G., and Halliday, M. A. K., eds., Language, Semiotics, Ideology. Sydney: Pathfinder Press. 225–67.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. 2000. Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English. In Hunston, S. and Thompson, G., eds., Evaluation in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 142–75.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R.. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. 2010. Semantic Variation: Modelling Realisation, Instantiation and Individuation in Social Semiosis. In Bednarek, M. and Martin, J. R., eds., New Discourse on Language Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London: Continuum. 1–34.Google Scholar

McIntyre, D. 2012. Linguistics and Literature: Stylistics as a Tool for the Literary Critic. SRC Working Papers 1: 1–11.Google Scholar

Miller, D. R. 1998. Insegnando la lingua speciale del testo letterario: l’approccio sociosemiotico. In Pavesi, M. and Bernini, G., eds., L’apprendimento linguistico all’Università: le lingue speciali. Roma: Bulzoni. 271–93.Google Scholar

Miller, D. R. 2007. Construing the ‘Primitive’ Primitively: Grammatical Parallelism as Patterning and Positioning Strategy in D. H. Lawrence. In Miller, D. R. and Turci, M., eds., Language and Verbal Art Revisited: Linguistic Approaches to the Study of Literature. Sheffield: Equinox. 41–67.Google Scholar

Miller, D. R. 2010. The Hasanian Framework for the Study of ‘Verbal Art’ Revisited … and Reproposed. In Douthwaite, J. and Wales, K., eds., Stylistics and Co. (Unlimited): The Range, Methods and Applications of Stylistics. Textus 23(1): 71–94.Google Scholar

Miller, D. R. 2012. Slotting Jakobson into the Social Semiotic Approach to ‘Verbal Art’: A Modest Proposal. In Dalziel, F., Gesuato, S., and Musacchio, M. T., eds., A Lifetime of English Studies. Essays in Honour of Carol Taylor Torsello. Padua: Il Poligrafo. 215–26.Google Scholar

Miller, D. R. 2013. Another Look at Social Semiotic Stylistics: Coupling Hasan’s ‘Verbal Art’ Framework with ‘the Mukařovský-Jakobson Theory’. In Gouveia, C. A. M. and Alexandre, M. F., eds., Languages, Metalanguages, Modalities, Cultures: Functional and Socio-discoursive Perspectives. Lisbon: BonD. 121–40.Google Scholar

Miller, D. R. 2016a. Jakobson’s Place in Hasan’s Social Semiotic Stylistics: ‘Pervasive Parallelism’ as Symbolic Articulation of Theme. In Bowcher, W. L. and Liang, J. Y., eds., Society in Language, Language in Society: Essays in Honour of Ruqaiya Hasan. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Miller, D. R. 2016b. On Negotiating the Hurdles of Corpus-assisted Appraisal Analysis in Verbal Art. In Gardner, S. and Alsop, S., eds., Systemic Functional Linguistics in the Digital Age. Sheffield: Equinox. 211–28.Google Scholar

Miller, D. R. and Luporini, A.. 2015. Social Semiotic Stylistics and the Corpus: How Do-able is an Automated Analysis of Verbal Art? In Duguid, A., Marchi, A., Partington, A., and Taylor, C., eds., Gentle Obsessions: Literature, Linguistics and Learning: In Honour of John Morley. Roma: Artemide Edizioni. 235–50.Google Scholar

Miller, D. R. and Luporini, A.. 2018. Software-assisted Systemic Socio-Semantic Stylistics: Appraising tru* in J.M. Coetzee’s Foe. In Wegener, R., Oesterle, A., and Neumann, R., eds., On Verbal Art: Essays in Honour of Ruqaiya Hasan. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar

Miller, D. R. and Turci, M., eds. 2007. Language and Verbal Art Revisited: Linguistic Approaches to the Study of Literature. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar

Mukařovský, J. 1964. Standard Language and Poetic Language. In Garvin, P. L., ed. and trans., A Prague School Reader on Aesthetics, Literary Structure and Style. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 17–30.Google Scholar

Mukařovský, J. 1977. The Word and Verbal Art: Selected Essays by Jan Mukařovský. Edited and translated by Burbank, J. and Steiner, P.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mukařovský, J. 1978. Structure, Sign and Function: Selected Essays by Jan Mukařovský. Edited and translated by Burbank, J. and Steiner, P.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Selden, R. 1989. The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Vol. 8: From Formalism to Poststructuralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simpson, P. 2014. Stylistics. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Stankiewicz, E. 1983. Roman Jakobson, Teacher and Scholar. In A Tribute to Roman Jakobson 1896–1982. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 17–26.Google Scholar

Swain, E. 2014. Translating Metaphor in Literary Texts: An Intertextual Approach. In Miller, D. R. and Monti, E., eds., Tradurre Figure/Translating Figurative Language. Bologna: Bononia University Press. 241–54.Google Scholar

Taylor Torsello, C. 2007. Projection in Literary and Non-literary Texts. In Miller, D. R. and Turci, M., eds., Language and Verbal Art Revisited: Linguistic Approaches to the Study of Literature. Sheffield: Equinox. 115–48.Google Scholar

Taylor Torsello, C. 2016. Woolf’s Lecture/Novel/Essay A Room of One’s Own. In Miller, D. R. and Bayley, P., eds., Hybridity in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Grammar, Text and Discursive Context. Sheffield: Equinox. 240–67.Google Scholar

Thompson, G. 2014. Affect and Emotion, Target-value Mismatches, and Russian Dolls: Refining the Appraisal Model. In Thompson, G. and Alba-Juez, L., eds., Evaluation in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 47–66.CrossRef Google Scholar

Toolan, M. 2001. Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Toolan, M. 2009. Narrative Progression in the Short Story: A Corpus Stylistic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Turci, M. 2007. The Meaning of Dark* in Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. In Miller, D. R. and Turci, M., eds., Language and Verbal Art Revisited: Linguistic Approaches to the Study of Literature. Sheffield: Equinox. 97–114.Google Scholar

Turci, M. 2010. The Literary Text at the Borders of Linguistics and Culture: A SF Analysis of Les Murray’s Migratory. In Swain, E., ed., Thresholds and Potentialities of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Applications to Multilingual, Multimodal and Other Specialised Discourses. Trieste: Edizioni Università di Trieste. 334–46.Google Scholar

Wales, K. 2001. A Dictionary of Stylistics. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Wegener, R., Neumann, S., and Oesterle, A., eds. 2018. On Verbal Art: Essays in Honour of Ruqaiya Hasan. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar

Wimsatt, W. K. and Beardsley, M.. 1949. The Affective Fallacy. Sewanee Review 57(1): 31–55.Google Scholar

Yahya Ali Bani Salameh, M. 2010. Stylistic Manipulations in Henry James’ Novel The Portrait of a Lady. PhD Thesis, Department of Linguistics, Aligarh Muslim University.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.