Aaken, Anne, 2009. ‘International investment law between commitment and flexibility: a contract theory analysis’, Journal of International Economic Law 12, 507–38.Google Scholar

Aaken, Anne 2014. ‘Behavioral international law and economics’, Harvard Journal of International Law 55.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth, 2007. ‘Enriching rational choice institutionalism for the study of international law’, University of Illinois Law Review 5, 5–46.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth, and Snidal, Duncan, 2000. ‘Hard and soft law in international governance’, International Organization 54(3): 421–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth, 2002 ‘Filling in the folk theorem: the role of gradualism and legalization in international cooperation to combat corruption’, working paper.Google Scholar

Aguilar-Alvarez, Guillermo, and Park, William, 2003. ‘The new face of investment arbitration: NAFTA chapter 11’, Yale Journal of International Law 28, 365–401.Google Scholar

Agyemang, Augustus Asante, 1988. ‘African states and ICSID arbitration’, Comparative International Law Journal of South Africa 21(2): 177–89.Google Scholar

Agyemang, Augustus Asante, 1989. ‘African courts, the settlement of investment disputes and the enforcement of awards’, Journal of African Law 33(1): 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aisbett, Emma, Karp, Larry, and McAusland, Carol, 2010. ‘Police powers, regulatory takings and the efficient compensation of domestic and foreign investors’, The Economic Record 86(274): 367–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akinboade, Oludele, Siebrits, Franz, and Roussot, Elizabeth, 2006. ‘Foreign direct investment in South Africa’, in Ibi Ajayi, S. (ed.), Foreign Direct Investment in Sub-Saharan Africa: Origins, Targets, Impact and Potential. Nairobi: African Economic Research Consortium.Google Scholar

Allee, Todd, and Peinhardt, Clint, 2010. ‘Delegating differences: bilateral investment treaties and bargaining over dispute resolution provisions’, International Studies Quarterly 54(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Graham, 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Alschner, Wolfgang, 2014. ‘Regionalism and overlap in investment treaty law – towards consolidation or contradiction?’ Journal of International Economic Law 17(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen, 1998. ‘Who are the “masters of the treaty”?: European governments and the European court of justice’, International Organization 52(1): 121–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen 2008. ‘Agents or trustees? International courts in their political context’, European Journal of International Relations 14(1): 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen 2014. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Alvarez, Jose, 1992. ‘Remarks’, ASIL Proceedings 86, 550–5.Google Scholar

Alvarez, Jose, 2005. ‘Do states socialize?’ Duke Law Journal 54(5): 961–74.Google Scholar

Alvarez, Jose, 2009. ‘A bit on custom’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 42, 17-64.Google Scholar

Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan, 1992. ‘The Prawn Farm (AAPL) arbitration’, Sri Lanka Journal of International Law 4, 155.Google Scholar

Aricanli, Tosun, and Rodrik, Dani, 1990. The Political Economy of Turkey: Debt, Adjustment and Sustainability. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariely, Dan, 2008. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Arvanitis, Athanasios, 2005. ‘Foreign direct investment in South Africa: why has it been so low?’ in Nowak, Michael and Ricci, Luca Antonio (eds.), Post-Apartheid South Africa. The First Ten Years. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar

Aryeetey, Ernest, Harrigan, Jane, and Nissanke, Machiko (eds.), 2000. Economic Reforms in Ghana: The Miracle and the Mirage. Oxford: Africa World Press.Google Scholar

Asante, Samuel K., 1988. ‘International law and foreign investment: a reappraisal’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 37(3): 558–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asiedu-Akrofi, Derek, 1992. ‘ICSID arbitral decision’, American Journal of International Law 86(2): 371–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Athukorala, Prema-chandra, 2006. ‘Outward-oriented policy reforms and industrialisation: the Sri Lankan experience’, Journal of South Asian Development 1(1): 19–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamert, Justus, Gilardi, Fabrizio, and Wasserfallen, Fabio, 2014, October. ‘Learning and the diffusion of regime contention in the Arab Spring’, working paper, University of Zurich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bath, Vivienne, and Nottage, Luke, 2011. Foreign Investment and Dispute Resolution Law and Practise in Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bekker, Pieter, and Ogawa, Akiko, 2013. ‘The impact of bilateral investment treaty (BIT) proliferation on demand for investment insurance: reassessing political risk insurance after the “BIT bang”,’ ICSID Review 28(2): 314–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Axel, 2011. ‘The politics of China's investment treaty-making program’, in Broude, Tomer, Busch, Marc, and Porges, Amy (eds.), The Politics of International Economic Law. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Berger, Axel, Busse, Matthias, Nunnenkamp, Peter, and Roy, Martin, 2011. ‘More stringent BITs, less ambiguous effects on FDI? not a bit!’ Economics Letters 112(3): 270–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyers, Michael, 1997. ‘Taking the law out of international law: a critique of the “iterative perspective”’, Harvard International Law Journal 38(1): 201–7.Google Scholar

Bidwell, Percy, and Diebold, William Jr., 1949. ‘The United States and the international trade organization’, International Conciliation 1, 87–239.Google Scholar

Bjorklund, Andrea, 2008. ‘The emerging civilization of investment arbitration’, Penn State Law Review 113(4): 1269–300.Google Scholar

Bjorklund, Andrea, 2013. ‘The role of counterclaims in rebalancing investment law’, Lewis and Clark Law Review 17(2): 462–80.Google Scholar

Blake, Daniel, 2013. ‘Thinking ahead: time horizons and the legalization of international investment agreements’, International Organization 67(4): 797–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonnitcha, Jonathan, 2014. Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonnitcha, Jonathan, and Aisbett, Emma, 2013. ‘An economic analysis of the substantive protections provided by investment treaties’, in Sauvant, Karl (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2011/12. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boockmann, Bernhard, and Dreher, Axel, 2003. ‘The contribution of the IMF and the World Bank to economic freedom’, European Journal of Political Economy 19(3): 633–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, John, and Drahos, Peter, 2000.Global Business Regulation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brett, Edward, 2005. ‘From corporatism to liberalization in Zimbabwe: economic policy regimes and political crisis, 1980–1997’, International Political Science Review 26(1): 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broches, Aaron, 1995.Selected Essays: World Bank, ICSID, and Other Subjects of Public and Private International Law. London: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Broude, Tomer, 2013. ‘Behavioural international law’, International Law Forum at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Research Paper, no. 12–13.Google Scholar

Brower, Charles, 1999. ‘Ibrahim Shihata and the resolution of international investment disputes: the masterful missionary’, Studies in Transnational Legal Policy 31, 79–83.Google Scholar

Brower, Charles, and Wong, Jarrod, 2005, May. ‘General valuation principles: the case of Santa Elena’, in Weiler, Todd (ed.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron.Google Scholar

Brower, Charles, and Blanchard, Sadie, 2014, January. ‘From “dealing in virture” to “profiting from injustice”: the case against “re-statification” of investment dispute settlement’, Harvard International Law Journal 55, 45–59.Google Scholar

Brower, Charles, and Schill, Stephan, 2009. ‘Is arbitration a threat or a boon to the legitimacy of international investment law’, Chicago Journal of International Law 9(2): 471–98.Google Scholar

Brunetti, Maurizio, 2001. ‘The Iran-United States claims tribunal, NAFTA Chapter 11, and the doctrine of indirect expropriation’, Chicago Journal of International Law 2, 203.Google Scholar

Bubb, Ryan, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan, 2007. ‘BITs and bargains: strategic aspects of bilateral and multilateral regulation of foreign investment’, International Review of Law and Economics 27, 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burkhardt, Hans-Martin, 1986. ‘Investment protection treaties: recent trends and prospects’, Aussenwirtschaft: Schweizerische Zeitschrift für international Wirtschaftsbeziehungen 41(1): 99–105.Google Scholar

Burley, Anne-Marie, and Mattli, W., 1993. ‘Europe before the court: a political theory of legal integration’, International Organization 47(1): 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busch, Marc, Reinhardt, Eric, Shaffer, Gregory, 2009. ‘Does legal capacity matter? A survey of WTO members?’ World Trade Review 8(4): 559–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Büthe, Tim, and Milner, Helen, 2009. ‘Bilateral investment treaties and foreign direct investment’, in Sauvant, Karl and Sachs, Lisa (eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Büthe, Tim, and Milner, Helen, 2014. ‘Foreign direct investment and institutional diversity in trade agreements: credibility, commitment, and economic flows in the developing world, 1971–2007’. World Politics 66(1): 88–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, David, 1994. ‘South African arbitration legislation – the need for reform’, Comparative International Law Journal of South Africa 27.Google Scholar

Butler, David, and Finsen, Eyvind, 1996. ‘Southern Africa’, in Cotran, Eugene and Amissah, Austin (eds.), Arbitration in Africa. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Callander, Steven, 2008. ‘A theory of policy expertise’, Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3, 123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Maxwell, and Tomlin, Brian, 2002. The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal Was Done. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Caplin, Andrew, and Martin, Daniel, 2012. ‘Defaults and attention: the drop out effect’, National Bureau of Economic Research, no. w17988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carim, Xavier, 2010, September 13. ‘Update on EPA negotiations’, speaking points to Tralac Seminar, Cape Town, available at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2010/september/tradoc_146522.30%20July%202010.2.pdf.Google Scholar

Carlson, Scott, 1995. ‘Foreign investment laws and foreign direct investment in developing countries: Albania's experiment’, International Lawyer 19(3): 577–98.Google Scholar

Central and Eastern European Law Initiative (CEELI), 1993a. Analysis of Two Draft Proposals on Foreign Investment for Lithuania. Washington DC: American Bar Association.Google Scholar

Central and Eastern European Law Initiative (CEELI), 1993b. Country Strategies for the Rule of Law Program for Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia. Washington DC: American Bar Association.Google Scholar

Central and Eastern European Law Initiative (CEELI), 1993c. Report to the United States Agency for International Development on the Activities of the American Bar Association Central and Eastern European Law Initiative (CEELI), July 1993–December 1993. Washington DC: American Bar Association.Google Scholar

Central and Eastern European Law Initiative (CEELI), 1996. Analysis of the Draft Law on Foreign Investment Activities in Nizhny Novgorod Oblast. Washington DC: American Bar Association.Google Scholar

Chaskalson, Arthur, 1994. ‘The property clause: section 28 of the Constitution’, South Africa Journal of Human Rights 10, 131–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christie, Richard, 1993. ‘South Africa as a venue for international commercial arbitration’, Arbitration International 9(2): 153–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christy, Paul III, 1990–1. ‘Negotiating investment in the GATT: a call for functionalism’, Michigan Journal of International Law 12(3): 743–98.Google Scholar

Cokorinos, Lee, and Mittelman, James, 1988. ‘Reagan and the Pax Afrikaana’, in Morely, Morris (ed.), Crisis and Confrontation: Ronald Reagan's Foreign Policy. Totawa: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Colombatto, Enrico, and Macey, Jonathan, 1996. ‘A public choice model of international economic cooperation and the decline of the nation state’, Cardozo Law Review, 925–56.Google Scholar

Conlisk, John, 1996. ‘Why bounded rationality?’ Journal of Economic Literature 34(2): 669–700.Google Scholar

Copenhagen Economics, 2012. EU-China Investment Study. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Economics.Google Scholar

Dashwood, Hevina, 2000. Zimbabwe: The Political Economy of Transformation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, Erica, Gilovich, Thomas, and Regan, Dennis, 2002. ‘Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(10): 1379–1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Decker, Stephanie, 2012. ‘Using archives to understand the difficulties of translating theory into practice: economic advisors in Ghana, 1960–85’, presented at the World Bank Conference on Using History to Inform Development Policy: The Role of Archives, 25–26 October.Google Scholar

Delaume, Georges, 1985. ‘ICSID and bilateral investment treaties’, News from ICSID, no. 1, Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

DeLisle, Jacques, 1999. ‘Lex Americana? United States legal assistance, American legal models, and legal change in the post-communist world and beyond’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 20(2): 179–308.Google Scholar

Denza, Eileen, and Brooks, Shelagh, 1987. ‘Investment protection treaties: the British experience’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 36(4): 908–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Department of Minerals and Energy, Republic of South Africa, 1998. A minerals and mining policy for South Africa.Google Scholar

Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), Republic of South Africa, 2009, June. Government position paper on bilateral investment treaty policy framework review.Google Scholar

Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), Republic of South Africa, 2010, March 29. ‘The promotion and reciprocal protection of investments agreement between the governments of the republic of South Africa and the republic of Zimbabwe’, Explanatory Memorandum.Google Scholar

Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), Republic of South Africa, 2008, January 30. ‘SADC EPA Group – EC Negotiations: Assessing the Emerging Outcome’.Google Scholar

Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), Republic of South Africa, 2008, June 11. ‘Trade negotiations update’, Parliamentary Portfolio Committee Briefing Session, Cape Town.Google Scholar

Development Committee of the World Bank, 1992. ‘Communiqué of the Development Committee’, in Presentations to the 44th Meeting of the Development Committee, Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryan, 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Di John, Jonathan, 2005. ‘Economic liberalization, political instability, and state capacity in Venezuela’, International Political Science Review 26(1): 107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diaz, Fernando, 2009, June 5. ‘Ecuador continues exit from ICSID’, Investment Treaty News.Google Scholar

Dobbin, Frank, Simmons, Beth, and Garrett, Geoffrey, 2007. ‘The global diffusion of public policies: social construction, coercion, competition, or learning?’ Annual Review of Sociology 33, 449–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dolzer, Rudolf, 2005. ‘The impact of international investment treaties on domestic administrative law’, New York University Journal of International Law and Policy 26, 953–72.Google Scholar

Dolzer, Rudolf, and Stevens, Margrete, 1995. Bilateral Investment Treaties. Hague: Martinus Neijhof.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dolzer, Rudolf, and Kim, Yun-I, 2013. ‘Germany’, in Brown, Chester (ed.), Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Donovan, Dolores, 1993. ‘Cambodia: building a legal system from scratch’, International Lawyer 27(2): 445–54.Google Scholar

Douglas, Zachary, 2006. ‘Nothing if not critical for investment treaty arbitration: Occidental, Eureko and Methanex’, Arbitration International 22(1): 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eberhardt, Pia, and Olivet, Cecilia, 2012. Profiting from Injustice: How Law Firms, Arbitrators and Financiers Are Fuelling an Investment Arbitration Boom. Brussels/Amsterdam: Corporate Observatory Europe.Google Scholar

Echandi, Roberto, 2011. ‘What do developing countries expect from the international investment regime?’ in Alvarez, Jose and Sauvant, Karl (eds.), The Evolving International Investment Regime. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Economist Intelligence Unit, 2011, June 11. Political risk in developing countries focused on expropriation. Draft survey for MIGA. On file with author.Google Scholar

Economist Intelligence Unit 2015. Risk and Return: Foreign Direct Investment and the Rule of Law. London: Economist Intelligence Unit.Google Scholar

Einhorn, Hillel, 1974. ‘Expert judgment: some necessary conditions and an example’, Journal of Applied Psychology 4(1): 562–71.Google Scholar

Elkins, Zachary, Guzman, Andrew, and Simmons, Beth (EGS), 2006. ‘Competing for capital: the diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960–2000’, International Organization 60(4): 811–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elkins, Zachary, Guzman, Andrew, and Simmons, Beth (EGS), 2007a. ‘Replication data for competing for capital: the diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1959–2000’.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elkins, Zachary, 2007b. ‘Competing for capital: the diffusion of bilateral investment treaties’, in Simmons, Beth, Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey (eds.), The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elkins, Zachary, 2008. ‘Competing for capital: the diffusion of bilateral investment treaties’, University of Illinois Law Review 1, 265.Google Scholar

Elkins, Zachary, 2010a. ‘Competing for capital: the diffusion of bilateral investment treaties’, in Waibel, Michael, Kaushal, Asha, Chung, Kyo-Hwa, and Balchin, Claire (eds.), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration. Alphen Aan den Reijn: Kluwer Law.Google Scholar

Elkins, Zachary, 2010b. ‘Competing for capital: the diffusion of bilateral investment treaties’, in Frieden, Jeffry, Lake, David, and Broz, Lawrence, International Political Economy, 5th ed. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, and Melton, James, 2014. ‘Imagining a world without the universal declaration of human rights’, working paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elms, Deborah, 2013. ‘New directions for IPE: drawing from behavioral economics’, in Palan, Rolan (ed.), Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories, 2nd ed., London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Esty, Daniel, 2006. ‘Good governance at the supra-national scale: globalizing administrative law’, Yale Law Journal 115, 1490–1562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

European Commission, 2000. Survey of the attitudes of the European business community to international investment rules, conducted by T. N. Sofres consulting on behalf of the European Commission, DG Trade.Google Scholar

Fatouros, A., 1961. ‘An international code to protect private investment: proposals and perspectives’, University of Toronto Law Journal 14(1): 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faya Rodriguez, Alejandro, 2005. ‘Mexico signs two new bilateral investment treaties’, North American Free Trade and Investment Report 15(16): 6–8.Google Scholar

Fecák, Tomáš, 2011. ‘Czech experience with bilateral investment treaties: somewhat bitter taste of investment protection’, Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law 2, 233–67.Google Scholar

FIAS, 1994. Bulgaria: The Climate for Foreign Direct Investments. Diagnosis and Recommendations. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

FIAS, 1997a. Promoting Foreign Direct Investment in Jordan: Policy, Strategy, and Institutions. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

FIAS, 1997b. Republic of Sierra Leone: Formulation of a New Investment Law. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

FIAS, 1998. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Improving the Environment for Foreign Direct Investment. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

FIAS, 1999a. Bosnia and Herzegovina: Institutional Framework for Foreign Investment Promotion. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

FIAS, 1999b. Slovak Republic: Legal, Regulatory, and Tax Improvements for Attracting Foreign Direct Investment. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

FIAS, 1999c. Iran: Diagnostic of the Investment Environment. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

FIAS, 2001a. Brazil: Legal, Policy and Administrative Barriers to Investment in Brazil, vol. 1, Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

FIAS, 2001b. Albania: Diagnostic Study. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

FIAS, 2001c. Honduras: The Climate for Foreign Direct Investment and How It Can Be Improved. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

FIAS, 2001d. Bosnia and Herzegovina: Commercial Legal Framework and Administrative Barriers to Foreign Investment. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

FIAS, 2004. Grenada: A Diagnostic Review of the Investment Climate. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Finger, Matthias, and Ruchat, Berangere, 2000. The transformation of international public organizations: the case of UNCTAD, working paper of IDHEAP 14/2000. Lausanne: Institut de Hautes Etudes en Administration Publique.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn, 1998. ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization 52(4): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fishbach, Steven, 1996. ‘“The quiet revolution”: trade and investment liberalization in Chile and Jamaica’, Administrative Law Review 48(4): 527–43.Google Scholar

Franck, Susan, 2007. ‘Empirically evaluating claims about investment treaty arbitration’, North Carolina Law Review 86(1): 1–87.Google Scholar

Fredriksson, Torbjorn, and Zimny, Zbigniew, 2004. ‘Foreign direct investment and transnational corporations’, in UNCTAD, Beyond Conventional Wisdom in Development Policy: An Intellectual History of UNCTAD 1964–2004. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

Frenkel, William, and Sukhman, Michael, 1993. ‘New foreign investment regimes of Russia and other republics of the former U.S.S.R.: a legislative analysis and historical perspective’, British Columbia International and Comparative Law Review 16(2): 321–423.Google Scholar

Galbraith, Jean, 2013. ‘Treaty options: towards a behavioral understanding of treaty design’, Virginia Journal of International Law 53, 309.Google Scholar

Galinsky, Adam, and Mussweiler, Thomas, 2001. ‘First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(4): 657–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gallagher, Kevin, and Shrestha, Elen, 2011. ‘Investment treaty arbitration and developing countries: a re-appraisal’, Global Development and Environmental Institute working paper 11-01.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Norah, and Shan, Wenhua, 2009. Chinese Investment Treaties. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gallins, Glen, 1984. ‘Bilateral investment protection treaties’, Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 2, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gantz, David, 2004. ‘The evolution of FTA investment provisions: from NAFTA to the United States-Chile free trade agreement’, American University International Law Review 19(4), 679–767.Google Scholar

Gardner, James, 1980. Legal Imperialism: American Lawyers and Foreign Aid in Latin America. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Gilardi, Fabrizio, 2010. ‘Who learns from what in policy diffusion processes?’ American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 650–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilardi, Fabrizio, 2014, March 10. ‘Four ways we can improve policy diffusion research’, working paper, available at myweb.uiowa.edu/fboehmke/shambaugh2014/papers/Gilardi-4-Theses-Diffusion.pdf.Google Scholar

Gilovich, Thomas, 2000, June. Motivated skepticism and motivated credulity: differential standards of evidence in the evaluation of desired and undesired propositions. Address presented at the 12th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Society, Miami Beach, Florida.Google Scholar

Gilovich, Thomas, and Griffin, Dale, 2002. ‘Introduction – heuristics and biases: then and now’, in Gilovich, Thomas, Griffin, Dale, and Kahneman, Daniel (eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, 2005. ‘International substitutes for domestic institutions: bilateral investment treaties and governance’, International Review of Law and Economics 25(1): 107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert (eds.), 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, David, 1990. ‘The Polish foreign investment law of 1990’, The International Lawyer 24(2): 335–63.Google Scholar

Gottwald, Eric, 2007. ‘Levelling the playing field: is it time for a legal assistance center for developing nations in investment treaty arbitration?’ American University International Law Review 22(2): 237–75.Google Scholar

Graham, Edward, 2000. Fighting the Wrong Enemy: Antiglobal Activists and Multinational Enterprises. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar

Gregory, Neil, Wagle, Dileep, and Weigel, Dale, 1997. Foreign Direct Investment, vol. 5, Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation and Foreign Investment Advisory Services.Google Scholar

Grewlich, Klaus, 1980. Transnational Enterprises in a New International System. Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.Google Scholar

Gruber, Lloyd, 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gudgeon, K., 1986. ‘United States bilateral investment treaties: comments on their origin, purposes, and general treatment standards’, International Tax and Business Lawyer 4(1): 105–31.Google Scholar

Gunawardana, Asoka, 1992. ‘The inception and growth of bilateral investment promotion and protection treaties’, ASIL Proceedings 86, 544–50.Google Scholar

Gurowitz, Amy, 2006. ‘The diffusion of international norms: why identity matters’, International Politics 43(3): 305–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guzman, Andrew, 1998. ‘Why LDCs sign treaties that hurt them: explaining the popularity of bilateral investment treaties’, Virginia Journal of International Law 38, 639–88.Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrew, 2008. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haber, Stephen, Klein, Herbert, Maurer, Noel, and Middlebrook, Kevin, 2008. Mexico Since 1980. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hafner-Burton, Emilie, Leveck, Brad, Victor, David, and Fowler, James, 2012. ‘A behavioral approach to international legal cooperation’, working paper 13, Laboratory on International Law and Regulation, University of California, San Diego.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haftel, Yoram, and Thompson, Alex, 2014. ‘Delayed ratification: the domestic fate of bilateral investment treaties’, International Organization 67(2): 355–87.Google Scholar

Haftel, Yoram, and Thompson, Alex, 2014. ‘When do states renegotiate international agreements? The case of bilateral investment treaties’, working paper.Google Scholar

Hale, Thomas. Between Interests and Law. Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Jonathan, 2012. ‘Omar Garcia-Boliva, and Hernando Otero’, in Latin American Investment Protections. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hausman, Daniel, and Welch, Brynn, 2010. ‘Debate: to nudge or not to nudge’, Journal of Political Philosophy 18(1): 123–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helfer, Laurence, 2005. ‘Exiting treaties’, Virginia Law Review 91(7): 1579–1648.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, 2005. ‘Why states create international tribunals: a response to professors Posner and Yoo’, California Law Review 93, (3): 899–956.Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis, 1979. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Herrera, Yoshiko, 2007. Imagined Economies: The Sources of Russian Regionalism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hershey, Amos, 1907. ‘The Calvo and Drago doctrines’, The American Journal of International Law 1(1): 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hey, Jeanne, and Klak, Thomas, 1999. ‘From protectionism towards neoliberalism: Ecuador across four administrations (1981–1996)’, Studies in Comparative International Development 34(3): 66–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodgson, Matthew, 2014. ‘Counting the costs of investment treaty arbitration’, Global Arbitration Review 9, 2.Google Scholar

Hohenemser, Cristoph, Kates, Robert W., and Slovic, Paul, 1983. ‘The nature of technological hazard’, Science 220(4595): 378–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hopfinger, Hans, and Boeckler, Marc, 1996. ‘Step by step to an open economic system: Syria sets course for liberalization’, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 23(2): 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hormeku, Tetteh, 1998. ‘NGOs critical of UNCTAD's investment and probusiness approach’, Third World Economics 187/188, 1.Google Scholar

Hornbeck, Stanley K., 1909. ‘The most-favored-nation clause’, The American Journal of International Law 3(4): 797–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, John D., and McCarty, Nolan, 2004. ‘Bureaucratic capacity, delegation, and political reform’, American Political Science Review 98(3): 481–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ICAS, 2010. Investing Across Borders, 2010. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

ICC, 1977. Bilateral Treaties for International Investment. Paris: ICC.Google Scholar

ICSID, 1974. Annual Report 1973/1974. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

ICSID, 1985. Annual Report. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

ICSID, 1995. Annual Report. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

IISD, 2004. An Assessment of the Investment Regime: Thailand Country Report. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar

IISD, 2010. Report on the Fourth Annual Forum of Developing Country Investment Negotiators. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar

IMF, 1995. World Economic Outlook, October 1995. Washington DC: IMF.Google Scholar

IMF, 1998, August 25. ‘Bolivia: enhanced structural adjustment facility policy framework paper, 1998–2001’.Google Scholar

IMF, 1999, July 29. ‘Letter of intent and memorandum of economic and financial policies of the government of Moldova’.Google Scholar

IMF, 1999. World Economic Outlook, October 1999. Washington DC: IMF.Google Scholar

IMF, 2006. Annual Report for the Executive Board, 2006. Washington DC: IMF.Google Scholar

IMF, 2004, June. ‘Uruguay’, IMF country report no. 04/172.Google Scholar

IMF, 2004, November. ‘Uruguay: letter of intent and technical memorandum of understanding’, 12.Google Scholar

IMF’s Independent Evaluation Office (IEO), 2005. The IMF's Approach to Capital Account Liberalization. Washington DC: IMF.Google Scholar

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), 1947. Annual Report 1946–1947. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), 1969. The World Bank, IDA and IFC, Policies and Operations. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

International Investment and Development Committee of the American Bar Association's Section of International Law and Practice, 1992. ‘Preliminary comments of international investment and development committee on draft Albanian foreign investment law’, in CEELI, Analysis of Albania’s Foreign Investment Act. Washington DC: American Bar Association.Google Scholar

Jandhyala, Srividya, Gertz, Geoffrey, and Poulsen, Lauge. 2015. ‘Legalization and Diplomacy: Does Arbitration De-politicize Investment Disputes?’ working paper.Google Scholar

Jandhyala, Srividya and Weiner, Robert J., 2012. ‘Institutions sans frontiers: international agreements and foreign investment’, Journal of Business Studies 45(6): 649–69.Google Scholar

Jandhyala, Srividya, Henisz, Witold, and Mansfield, Edward, 2011. ‘Three waves of BITs: the global diffusion of foreign investment policy’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 55(6): 1047–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, Nathan, 2005. ‘Measuring risk: political risk insurance premiums and domestic political institutions’, working paper 512002.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert, 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, Eric, Hershey, John, Meszaros, Jacqueline, and Kunreuther, Howard, 1993. ‘Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Lise and Sachs, Lisa, 2014. ‘International investment agreements, 2011–2012: a review of trends and new approaches’, in Bjorklund, Andrea (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2012–2013. New York: Oxford University Press, 219–61.Google Scholar

Johnson, Lise, and Volkov, Oleksandr, 2013. ‘Investor-state contracts, host-state “commitments” and the myth of stability in international law’, American Review of International Arbitration 24(361): 361–415.Google Scholar

Jones, Bryan D., 2001. Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R., 2005. The Politics of Attention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Bryan D., ‘From there to here: punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing’, Policy Studies Journal 4(1): 1–20.Google Scholar

Juillard, Patrick, 2001, May 28–29. ‘Bilateral investment treaties in the context of international investment law’, OECD Roundtable, Dubrovnik, Croatia.Google Scholar

Jupille, Joseph, Mattli, Walter, and Snidal, Duncan, 2013. Institutional Choice in Global Commerce: Governance Strategies from the 19th Century to the Present. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahan, Dan, Slovic, Paul, Braman, Donald, and Gastil, John, 2006. ‘Fear of democracy: a cultural evaluation of Sunstein on risk’, Harvard Law Review 119, 1071–109.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos, 1979. ‘Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica 47(2): 263–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack, and Thaler, Richard, 1991. ‘Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1): 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karsegard, Olof, Bravo, Pedro, and Blom, Hubert, 2006. Final In-Depth Evaluation Report, September 2000-July 2005: UNCTAD Work Programme on Capacity Building in Developing Countries on Issues in International Investment Agreements. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

Kates, Robert, 1962. ‘Hazard and choice perception in flood plain management’, research paper no. 78, University of Chicago, Department of Geography.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter, Keohane, Robert, and Krasner, Stephen, 1998. ‘International organization and the study of world politics’, International Organization 52(4): 645–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann, Chaim, 1994. ‘Out of the lab and into the archives: a method for testing psychological explanations of political decision making’, International Studies Quarterly 38(4): 557–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaushal, Asha, 2009. ‘Revisiting history: how the past matters for the present backlash against the foreign investment regime’, Harvard Journal of International Law 50(2): 491–534.Google Scholar

Keller, Carmen, Siegrist, Michael, and Gutscher, Heinz, 2006. ‘The role of affect and availability heuristics in risk communication’, Risk Analysis 26(3): 631–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kellner, Tomas, 2003, April 28. ‘The informer: call it the Ronald Lauder tax’, Forbes.Google Scholar

Kelman, Mark, 2011. The Heuristics Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, Robert, 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kerner, Andrew, and Lawrence, Jane, 2014. ‘What's the risk? bilateral investment treaties, political risk and fixed capital accumulation’, British Journal of Political Science 44(1): 107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khan, Ashfaque, 1997. ‘Foreign direct investment in Pakistan: policies and trends’, The Pakistan Development Review 36(4): 959–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khayat, Dany, 2012. ‘Bridging the investment claim gap between sophisticated investors and unprepared host states’, in UNCTAD, Investor-State Disputes: Prevention and Alternatives to Arbitration II. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

Kim, Jae Hoon, 2011. ‘Korea's development of a better investor-state dispute resolution system’, in UNCTAD, Investor-State Disputes: Prevention and Alternatives to Arbitration II. Geneva: United Nations, 67–70.Google Scholar

Kim, Soo Yeon, and Manger, Mark S., 2013, February 7–9. ‘Hubs of governance: path-dependence and higher-order effects of PTA formation’, working paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Political Economy of International Organizations.Google Scholar

Kinsella, Norman, 1993, November 18. ‘Comments on draft project of law on foreign capital investment in the Republic of Lithuania’, memorandum to Mr M. Černiauskas, president, Association of Lithuanian Chambers of Commerce and Industry.Google Scholar

Kinsella, Norman, 1997, March 25. ‘Draft law on stimulation of foreign investment for the Republic of Romania’, memorandum to Mr John C. Knechtle, director, Legal Assessments, ABA/CEELI.Google Scholar

Klug, Heinz, 2000. Constituting Democracy: Law Globalism and South Africa's Political Reconstruction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koh, Harold, 1997. ‘Review essay: why do nations obey international law?’ Yale Law Journal 106, 2599–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kong, Qiangjiang, 2003. ‘Bilateral investment treaties: the Chinese approach and practice’, Asian Yearbook of International Law 8, 105–36.Google Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan, 2001. ‘The rational design of international institutions’, International Organization 55(4): 761–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korobkin, Russell, 1998. ‘Inertia and preference in contract negotiation: the psychological power of default rules and form terms’, Vanderbilt Law Review 51, 1583–1651.Google Scholar

Korobkin, Russell, 2003. ‘Bounded rationality, standard form contracts, and unconscionability’, The University of Chicago Law Review 70(4): 1203–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krebs, Ronald, and Rapport, Aaron, 2012. ‘International relations and the psychology of time horizons’, International Studies Quarterly 56(3): 530–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kumar, Nagesh, 2005. ‘India liberalization, foreign direct investment flows, and development: Indian experience in the 1990s’, Economic and Political Weekly 40(14): 1459–69.Google Scholar

Kunda, Ziva, 1990. ‘The case for motivated reasoning’, Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Laborde, Gustavo, 2010. ‘The case for host state claims in investment arbitration’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lake, David, 2009. ‘Open economy politics: a critical review’, The Review of International Organizations 4(3): 219–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamertz, Kai, and Heugens, Pursey, 2009. ‘Institutional translation through spectatorship: collective consumption and editing of symbolic organizational texts by firms and their audiences’, Organization Studies 30(11): 1249–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leathley, Christian, 2011 April 13. ‘What will the recent entry into force of the UNASUR treaty mean for investment arbitration in Latin America?’ Kluwer Arbitration Blog.Google Scholar

Lemos, Leany and Campello, Daniela, 2013, April 1. ‘The non-ratification of bilateral investment treaties in Brazil: a story of conflict in a land of cooperation’, working paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leon, Peter, 2009. ‘Creeping expropriation of mining investments: an African perspective’, Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 27(4): 597–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, David, 1995. ‘Bulgarian trade and investment: a realistic assessment’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 27(2): 203–46.Google Scholar

Levy, Jack, 1992. ‘Prospect theory and international relations: theoretical applications and analytical problems’, Political Psychology 13(2): 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, Jack, 1994. ‘Learning and foreign policy: sweeping a conceptual minefield’, International Organization 48(2): 279–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, Jack, 1997. ‘Prospect theory, rational choice, and international relations’, International Studies Quarterly 41(1): 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lichtenstein, Sara, Slovic, Paul, Fischhoff, Baruch, Layman, Mark, and Combs, Barbara, 1978. ‘Judged frequency of lethal events’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4(6): 551.Google Scholar

Lim, Linda, and Pang, Eng, 1991. Foreign Direct Investment and Industrialization in Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Lipson, Charles, 1985. Standing Guard: Protecting Foreign Capital in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lipson, Charles, 1991. ‘Why are some international agreements informal?’ International Organization 45(4): 495–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loewenfeld, Andreas, 2003–4. ‘Investment agreements and international law’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 42(1): 123–30.Google Scholar

Lundahl, Mats, and Petersson, Lennart, 2009. ‘Post-apartheid South Africa: an economic success story?’ UN-WIDER research paper no. 2009/56.Google Scholar

Lupu, Yonathan, and Poast, Paul, 2013, October 21. ‘Are bilateral investment treaties really bilateral?’ working paper, available at ncgg.princeton.edu/IPES/2013/papers/F900_rm2.pdf.Google Scholar

Manger, Mark, 2008. ‘International investment agreements and services markets: locking in market failure?’ World Development 36(11 ): 2456–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manger, Mark, 2009. Investing in Protection: The Politics of Preferential Trade Agreements between North and South. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manger, Mark, and Peinhardt, Clint, 2013, August. ‘Learning and diffusion in international investment agreements’, working paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar

Mangklatanakul, Vilawan, 2012. ‘Thailand's first treaty arbitration: gain from pain’, in UNCTAD, Investor-State Disputes: Prevention and Alternatives to Arbitration II. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

Marais, Hein, 1998. South Africa: Limits to Change. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar

March, James, and Olsen, Johan 1984. ‘The new institutionalism: organizational factor in political life’, American Political Science Review 78(3): 734–49.Google Scholar

Markusen, James, 2001. ‘Commitment to rules on investment: the developing countries’ stake’, Review of International Economics 9(2): 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Lisa, and Simmons, Beth, 1998. ‘Theories and empirical studies of international institutions’, International Organization 52(4): 729–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marton, Katherin, 1993. ‘Foreign direct investment in Hungary’, Transnational Corporations 2(1): 111–34.Google Scholar

Mason, Edward, and Asher, Robert, 1973. The World Bank Since Bretton Woods. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Mattli, Walter, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, 1995. ‘Law and politics in the European Union: a reply to Garrett’, International Organization 49(1): 183–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maurer, Noel, 2013. The Empire Trap: The Rise and Fall of US Intervention to Protect American Property Overseas, 1893–2013. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Stephen, 2000. ‘Ten years of chaos in Burma: foreign investment and economic liberalization under the SLORC-SPDC, 1988 to 1998’, Pacific Affairs 73(2): 233–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClelland, Gary, Schultze, William, and Coursey, Don 1993. ‘Insurance for low-probability hazards: a bimodal response to unlikely events’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDermott, Rose, 2004. Political Psychology in International Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meaney, Constance, 1995. ‘Foreign experts, capitalists, and competing agendas: privatization in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary’, Comparative Political Studies 28(2): 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meseguer, Covadunga, 2005. ‘Policy learning, policy diffusion, and the making of a new order’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598: 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meseguer, Covadunga, 2006. ‘Rational learning and bounded rational learning in the diffusion of policy innovations’, Rationality and Society 18 (1): 35–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meseguer, Covadunga, 2009. Learning, Policy Making, and Market Reforms. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, John, 2000. ‘Globalization: sources and effects on national states and societies’, International Sociology 15(2): 233–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mieg, Harald, 2001. ‘Professionalization and professional activities in the Swiss market for environmental services’, in Filho, Walter Leal (ed.), Environmental Careers, Environmental Employment and Environmental Training. Frankfurt: Lang Verlag, 133–60.Google Scholar

Pas, Miga, 1991. Industrialized Countries’ Policies Affecting Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries, volume 1, Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Miles, Kate, 2013. The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment, and the Safeguarding of Capital. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mintz, Alex, 2007. ‘Behavioral IR as a subfield of international relations’, International Studies Review 9: 157.Google Scholar

Montt, Santiago, 2009. State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Global Constitutional and Administrative Law in the BIT Generation. Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Moyer, Homer Jr., Ellis, Mark, and D'Alemberte, Talbot, 2009. ‘The history of CEELI, the ABA's rule of law initiative, and the rule of law movement going forward (panel debate)’, Minnesota Journal of International Law 18(2): 304–42.Google Scholar

Naudé, Willem, 1998. ‘On Ethiopia's economic transition and beyond’, African Development Review 10(2): 121–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neale, Margaret, and Bazerman, Max, 1991. Cognition and Rationality in Negotiations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Neumayer, Eric, Nunnenkamp, Peter, and Roy, Martin, 2014. ‘Are stricter investment rules contagious? Host country competition for foreign direct investment through international agreements’, Kiel working paper no. 1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumayer, Eric and Plümper, Thomas, 2010. ‘Spatial effects in dyadic data’, International Organization 64(145): 145–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newcompe, Andrew, and Paradell, Lluis, 2009. Law and Practice of Investment Treaties. New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Newfarmer, Richard, 1985. ‘Economic policy towards the Caribbean basin’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 27(1): 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newman, Joseph, Wolf, William, and Hearst, Eliot, 1980. ‘The feature-positive effect in adult human subjects’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6(5): 630–50.Google ScholarPubMed

Nikomborirak, Deunden, 2004, March. ‘An assessment of the investment regime: Thailand country report’, in International Institute for Sustainable Development, Report of the International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar

Nisbett, Richard E., and Ross, Lee, 1980. Human Interference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Nkrumah, Kwame, 1964, March 11. ‘Blue print of our goal: launching the seven-year development plan’, available at nkrumahinfobank.org/article.php?id=355&c=51.Google Scholar

Ocran, T. Modibo, 1987. ‘Bilateral investment protection treaties: a comparative study’, New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law 8(3): 401–30.Google Scholar

Odell, John, 2000. Negotiating the World Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Odell, John, 2002. ‘Bounded rationality and the world political economy: the nature of decision making’, in Andrews, David, Henning, C. Randall, and Pauly, Louis (eds.), Governing the World's Money. Ithaca: Cornell University Press,Google Scholar

OECD, 1985. Intergovernmental Agreements Relating to Investment in Developing Countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

OECD, 1998. OECD Reviews of Foreign Direct Investment: Brazil 1998. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

OECD, 2010a. Indonesia—Investment Policy Review. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

OECD, 2010b. Morocco—Investment Policy Review. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

OECD, 2012a. May 16–July 9. Investor-State Dispute Settlement, Public Consultation. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

OECD, 2012b. Tunisia—Investment Policy Review, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Ofusu-Amaah, W. Paatii, 2002. ‘Legal and judicial reform in developing countries: reflections on world bank experience’, Law and Business Review of the Americas 8, 551–82.Google Scholar

Paparinskis, Martins, 2010. ‘Limits of depoliticization in contemporary investor-state arbitration’, Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law 3.Google Scholar

Paparinskis, Martins, 2013. The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parlett, Kate, 2011. The Individual in the International Legal System: Continuity and Change in International Law. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parliament of the Republic of South Africa, 1994, November 23. ‘White paper on reconstruction and development’, Government Gazette.Google Scholar

Parra, Antonio, 2012. The History of ICSID. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paulsson, Jan, 1995. ‘Arbitration without privity’, ICSID Review 10(2): 232–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paulsson, Jan, 2005. Denial of Justice in International Law. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paulsson, Jan, 2010. ‘The power of states to make meaning promises to foreigners’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1(2): 341–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, 2014. ‘At the edge of chaos? Foreign investment law as a complex adaptive system, how it emerged and how it can be reformed’. ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 29, 372–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peinhardt, Clint, and Allee, Todd, 2012. ‘Failure to deliver: the investment effects of US preferential economic agreements’, The World Economy 35(6): 757–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pererra, A. Rohan, 2000. ‘The role and implications of bilateral investment treaties’, Commonwealth Law Bulletin 26(1): 607–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pérez-López, Jorge, and Travieso-Díaz, Mathias, 2001. ‘The contribution of BITs to Cuba's foreign investment program’, Georgetown Law and Policy in International Business Journal 32, 529–70.Google Scholar

Peters, Paul, 1991. ‘Dispute settlement arrangements in investment treaties’, in Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 1991. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Peters, Paul, Schrijver, Nico and de Waart, Paul, 1984. ‘Permanent sovereignty, foreign investment and state practice’, in Hossain, Kamal and Chowdhury, Subrata (eds.), Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources in International Law: Principle and Practice. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar

Peterson, Luke, 2003, May 9. ‘South Africa's plans for black economic empowerment confronting foreign investor rights’, Investment Law and Policy Weekly News Bulletin.Google Scholar

Peterson, Luke, 2004. Bilateral Investment Treaties and Development Policy-Making. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar

Peterson, Luke, 2004. January, 5. ‘Early investment arbitrations against ‘improper’ use of environmental laws uncovered’, Investment Law and Policy Weekly News Bulletin.Google Scholar

Peterson, Luke, 2004, October, 13. ‘New US ambassador to Korea reiterates obstacles to BIT’, INVEST-SD: Investment Law and Policy Weekly News Bulletin.Google Scholar

Peterson, Luke, 2005, May, 5. ‘French insurance firm alleges Cambodia violated investment treaty’, INVEST-SD: Investment Law and Policy News Bulletin.Google Scholar

Peterson, Luke, 2005, August, 3. ‘India-Singapore FTA inked, investment provisions include important innovations’, INVEST-SD: Investment Law and Policy News Bulletin.Google Scholar

Peterson, Luke, 2006. South Africa's Bilateral Investment Treaties: Implications for Development and Human Rights. Geneva: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar

Peterson, Luke, 2008, October 22. ‘Swiss investor prevailed in 2003 in confidential BIT arbitration over South Africa land dispute’, Investment Arbitration Reporter.Google Scholar

Peterson, Luke, 2008, December, 11. ‘Croatia prevails in confidential arbitration with Canadian investor’, Investment Arbitration Reporter.Google Scholar

Peterson, Luke, 2009, March, 17. ‘South African court rules that mineral rights holders can claim for expropriation following introduction of new minerals rights regime; meanwhile, government about to file its written defense in international arbitration challenging the same legislation’, Investment Arbitration Reporter.Google Scholar

Peterson, Luke, 2011, April, 14. ‘In policy switch, Australia disavows need for investor-state arbitration provisions in trade and investment agreements’, Investment Arbitration Reporter.Google Scholar

Peterson, Luke and Balcerzak, Filip, 2014. ‘Amidst concerns about prompt payment of arbitral awards, stays of enforcement are lifted in two ICSID cases’, IA Reporter 7(9).Google Scholar

Peterson, Luke, and Vis-Dunbar, Damon, 2006, May 15. ‘UK and Mexico sign investment treaty, following on heels of UK treaty review’, Investment Treaty News.Google Scholar

Peterson, Luke, and Garland, Ross, 2010. Bilateral Investment Treaties and Land Reform in Southern Africa. Montreal: Rights and Democracy.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul, 2004. Politics in Time. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poulsen, Lauge, 2010. ‘The significance of south-south BITs for the international investment regime: a quantitative analysis’, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 30(1): 101–30.Google Scholar

Poulsen, Lauge 2011. Sacrificing sovereignty by chance: investment treaties, developing countries, and bounded rationality, dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar

Poulsen, Lauge, and Aisbett, Emma, 2013. ‘When the claim hits: bilateral investment treaties and bounded rational learning’, World Politics 65(2): 273–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poulsen, Lauge, Paparinskis, Martins, and Waibel, Michael, 2015. ‘Investment law before arbitration’, working paper.Google Scholar

Price, Daniel, 2009, May 14. ‘Keep international protections’, The Washington Times.Google Scholar

Raghavan, Chakravarthi, 1997. ‘Bilateral investment treaties play only a minor role in attracting FDI’, Third World Economics 162, 1–15.Google Scholar

Raiffa, Howard, 1982. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ramamurti, Ravi, 2003. ‘Can governments make credible commitments? Insights from infrastructure projects in developing regions’, Journal of International Management 9, 253ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramirez, Francisco, Meyer, John, Wotipka, Christin, and Drori, Gili, 2002. ‘Expansion and impact of the world human rights regime: longitudinal and cross-national analyses over the twentieth century’, National Science Foundation grant proposal.Google Scholar

Ranjan, Prabhash, 2014. ‘India and bilateral investment treaties – a changing landscape’, ICSID Review 29(2): 419–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ranjan, Prabhash, and Raju, Deepak, 2014. ‘Bilateral investment treaties and Indian judiciary’, George Washington International Law Review 46(4).Google Scholar

Rao, Sreenivasa, 2000. ‘Bilateral investment protection agreements: a legal framework for the protection of foreign investments’, Commonwealth Law Bulletin 26(1): 623–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiter, Dan, 1996.Crucible of Beliefs: Learning, Alliances, and World Wars. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reyna, Valerie, and Lloyd, Farrell, 2006. ‘Physician decision-making and cardiac risk: effects of knowledge, risk perception, risk tolerance, and fuzzy processing’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 12(3): 179–95.Google ScholarPubMed

Reyna, Valerie, Lloyd, Farrell, and Brainerd, Charles, 2003. ‘Memory, development, and rationality: an integrative theory of judgment and decision making’, Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research, 201–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Anthea, 2010. ‘Power and persuasion in investment treaty interpretation: the dual role of states’, American Journal of International Law 104(2): 179–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Anthea, 2014. ‘State-to-state investment treaty arbitration: a hybrid theory of interdependent rights and shared interpretive authority’, Harvard International Law Journal 55(1): 1–70.Google Scholar

Robin, Patricia, 1983–84. ‘The BIT won't bite: the American bilateral investment treaty program’, American University Law Review 33, 931–58.Google Scholar

Robinson, Patrick, 1993. ‘Treaty negotiation, drafting, ratification and accession of CARICOM states’, West Indian Law Journal 18(1).Google Scholar

Rodrik, Danni, 2006. ‘Understanding South Africa's economic puzzles’, NBER working paper 12565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, Susan, 2009. ‘The global BITs regime and the domestic environment for investment’, in Sauvant, Karl and Sachs, Lisa (eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rosert, Diana, 2014. The Stakes Are High: A Review of the Financial Costs of Investment Treaty Arbitration. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar

Ross, Alison, 2010a. ‘From ICCA to the icecaps: an interview with Francisco Orrego Vicuña’, Global Arbitration Review 5(4).Google Scholar

Ross, Alison, 2010b. ‘South Africa – is it time?’ Global Arbitration Review 5(4).Google Scholar

Rothstein, Robert, 1979. Global Bargaining: UNCTAD and the Quest for a New International Economic Order. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rovine, Arthur, 1987. ‘Report on bilateral investment treaties’, The International Lawyer 21, 274–7.Google Scholar

Rowe, Gene, and Wright, George, 2001. ‘Differences in expert and lay judgments of risk: myth or reality?’’, Risk Analysis 21(2): 341–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ryan, Brendan, 2005, September 15. ‘Offshore investors may sue SA government’, available at www.miningmx.com.Google Scholar

Ryans, John, and Baker, James, 1976. ‘The International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)’, Journal of World Trade Law 10, 65–79.Google Scholar

Sagafi-Nejad, T., 2008. The UN and Transnational Corporations: From Code of Conduct to Global Compact. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Salacuse, Jeswald, 1975. ‘Egypt's new law on foreign investment: the framework for economic openness’, The International Lawyer 9, 647–60.Google Scholar

Salacuse, Jeswald, 2010 ‘The emerging global regime for investment’, Harvard International Law Journal 51, 427–73.Google Scholar

Salacuse, Jeswald, 2013. The Three Laws of Foreign Investment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Salacuse, Jeswald, and Sullivan, Nicholas, 2005. ‘Do BITS really work? An evaluation of bilateral investment treaties and their grand bargain’, Harvard International Law Journal 46, 67–75.Google Scholar

Sands, Philippe, 2006. Lawless World. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Sauvant, Karl, 2009. ‘Driving and countervailing forces: a rebalancing of national FDI policies’, in Sauvant, Karl (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2008/2009. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sauvé, Pierre, 2006. ‘Multilateral rules on investment: is forward movement possible?’ Journal of International Economic Law 9(2): 325–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schelling, Thomas, 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schneider, Eric, and Bilgen, Alev, 1992. ‘Foreign investment laws in the republic of Turkey: a model for reform’, Transnational Lawyer 5(1): 99–130.Google Scholar

Schneiderman, David, 2008. Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy's Promise. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schneiderman, David, 2009. ‘Promoting equality, black economic empowerment, and the future of investment rules’, South African Journal on Human Rights 25(2): 246.Google Scholar

Schneiderman, David, 2010. ‘Judicial politics and international investment arbitration: seeking an explanation for conflicting outcomes’, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 30(3): 383–416.Google Scholar

Schneiderman, David, 2013. Resisting Economic Globalization: Critical Theory and International Investment Law. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, 2005. ‘A decade of increasing awareness of investment arbitration and increasing activity: an assessment’, available at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/54/36055388.pdf.Google Scholar

Schrijver, Nico, 2008. Sovereignty over Natural Resources: Balancing Rights and Duties. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schwarzenberger, Georg, 1969. Foreign Investments and International Law. London: Stevens.Google Scholar

Schwebel, Stephen, 2008. ‘The overwhelming merits of bilateral investment treaties’, Suffolk Transnational Law Review 32, 263.Google Scholar

Senses, Fikret, 1991. ‘Turkey's stabilization and structural adjustment program in retrospect and prospect’, The Developing Economies 29(3): 210–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sergeant, Barry, 2010, August 19. ‘South Africa: an inflection point?’ Mineweb, available at www.mineweb.com/mineweb/content/en/mineweb-political-economy?oid=110032&sn=Detail.Google Scholar

Shabu, Martin, 2011 April 7. ‘Czechs face uphill battle to cancel US investment treaty’, Czech Position.Google Scholar

Shafir, Eldar, 1992. ‘Prospect theory and political analysis: a psychological perspective’, Political Psychology 13(2): 311–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shawcross, Hartley, 1995. Life Sentence: The Memoirs of Hartley Shawcross. London: Constable.Google Scholar

Shelley, Marjorie, 1994. ‘Gain/loss asymmetry in risky intertemporal choice’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 59(1): 124–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shihata, Ibrahim, 1987. ‘Factors influencing the flow of foreign investment and the relevance of a multilateral guarantee scheme’, The International Lawyer 21(3): 671–94.Google Scholar

Shihata, Ibrahim, 1988. MIGA and Foreign Investment. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Shihata, Ibrahim, 1991. ‘Promotion of foreign direct investment – a general account, with particular reference to the role of the world bank group’, ICSID Review 6(2): 484–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shihata, Ibrahim, 1992. Legal Treatment of Foreign Investment: The World Bank Guidelines. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Shihata, Ibrahim, 1993, February. ‘Judicial reform in developing countries and the role of the World Bank’, paper presented at the Seminar on Justice in Latin America and the Caribbean in the 1990s, Inter-American Development Bank, San José, Costa Rica.Google Scholar

Shishi, L., 1988. ‘Bilateral investment promotion and protection agreements: practice of the People's Republic of China’, International Law and Development, 163.Google Scholar

Siegel, Deborah, 2013. ‘Capital account restrictions, trade agreements, and the IMF’, in Gallagher, Kevin and Stanley, Leonardo (eds.), Capital Account Regulations and the Trading System: A Compatibility Review. Boston University Press.Google Scholar

Sikkink, Kathryn, 1993. ‘Human rights, principled issue-networks, and sovereignty in Latin America’, International Organization 47(3): 411–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, Herbert, 1957. Models of Man. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert, 1959. ‘Theories of decision making in economics and behavioral science’, American Economic Review 49(3): 253–83.Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert, 1982. Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert, 1985. ‘Human nature and politics: the dialogue of psychology with political science’, American Political Science Review 79(2): 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, Herbert, 1997. An Empirically Based Microeconomics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Slovic, Paul, 1987. ‘Perception of risk’, Science 236(4799): 280–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smith, James, 2000. ‘The politics of dispute settlement design: explaining legalism in regional trade pacts’, International Organization 54(1): 137–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, Edward, 1994. ‘The Menem Revolution in Argentina: progress toward a hemispheric free trade area’, Texas International Law Journal 29(1): 95–122.Google Scholar

Society to Advance the Protection of Foreign Investment, 1957. International Convention for the Mutual Protection of Private Property Rights in Foreign Countries. Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar

Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy, 1994. The International Law on Foreign Investment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

South African Law Commission, 1998. Arbitration: an international arbitration act for South Africa, report.Google Scholar

St John, Taylor, 2014. ‘The power of modest multilateralism: the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), 1964–1980’, dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Ste-Marie, Diane, 1999. ‘Expert-novice differences in gymnastic judging: an information-processing perspective’, Applied Cognitive Psychology 13(3): 269–81.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stein, Jana, 2013. ‘The engines of compliance’, in Dunoff, Jeffrey and Pollack, Mark (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stewart, Terence, 1993. The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiation History (1986–1994), Volume Four: The End Game (Part I). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Stigler, George, and Becker, Gary, 1977. ‘De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum’, American Economic Review 67(2): 76–90.Google Scholar

Stockwell, Sarah, 2000. The Business of Decolonization: British Business Strategies in the Gold Coast. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strang, David, and Meyer, John, 2009. ‘Institutional conditions for diffusion’, in Krücken, Georg and Drori, Gili (eds.), World Society: The Writings of John W. Meyer. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass, (ed.), 2000. Behavioural Law and Economics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass, 2013. ‘Deciding by default’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 162(1): 1–58.Google Scholar

Szasz, Paul, 1971. ‘The investment disputes convention and Latin America’, Virginia Journal of International Law 11, 256–65.Google Scholar

Taber, Charles, and Lodge, Milton, 2006. ‘Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs’, American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 755–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Ian, and Smith, Karen, 2007. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thaler, Richard H., and Sunstein, Cass, 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Tienhaara, Kyla, 2009. The Expropriation of Environmental Governance: Protecting Foreign Investors at the Expense of Public Policy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tignor, Robert, 1998. Capitalism and Nationalism at the End of Empire: State and Business in Decolonizing Egypt, Nigeria, and Kenya, 1945–1963. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Trade Law Centre for Southern Africa, 2004. Investment Project: South African Case Study 10.Google Scholar

Travieso-Diaz, Matias, and Ferrate, Alejandro, 1996. ‘Recommended features of a foreign investment code for Cuba's free market transition’, North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 21(3): 511–60.Google Scholar

Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel, 1971. ‘Belief in the law of small numbers’, Psychological Bulletin 76(2): 105–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel, 1973. ‘Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability’ Cognitive Psychology 4(2): 207–32.Google Scholar

Ubezonu, Chudi, 1993. ‘Some recent amendments to laws affecting foreign investment in Nigeria’, ICSID Review 8(1): 123–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

United States Policy Toward International Investment, 1981, July 30, September 20, and October 28. Hearings before the subcommittee on international economic policy of the Committee on Foreign Relations, US Senate.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1992. World Investment Report 1992. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1995. World Investment Report 1995. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1996a. World Investment Report 1996. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1996b. International Investment Instruments: A Compendium, vol. III. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1996c, April 27. Midrand Declaration and Partnership for Growth and Development, adopted at the ninth session, Midrand.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1996d, August 1. ‘Current international arrangements governing foreign direct investment’, TD/B(43)/5.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1997a, June 2. ‘Expert meeting on existing agreements on investment and their development dimensions: chairman's summary’, TD/B/COM.2/EM.1/5.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1997b, October 3. ‘Draft report of the commission on investment, technology and related financial issues on its second session’, TD/B/COM.2/L.4/Add.1.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1997c. World Investment Report 1997. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1998a, September 17. ‘Draft report of the commission on investment, technology and related financial issues on its third session’, TD/B/COM.2/L.7.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1998b. Bilateral Investment Treaties in the Mid-1990s. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1998c. World Investment Report 1998. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1999a. World Investment Report 1999. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1999b. Trends in International Investment Agreements: An Overview. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1999c, January 14. ‘Seven G-15 countries negotiated eight bilateral investment treaties hosted by UNCTAD’, press release.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1999d, January 7. ‘UNCTAD hosts bilateral investment treaty negotiations by group of fifteen countries’, press release.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 1999e, January 14. ‘Bilateral investment treaties among the G-15: bilateral negotiations, final report, closing statement by Ambassador Hill’, UNCTAD/ITE/Misc.7/Rev.L,Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2000a. Investment Policy Review: Peru. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2000b. Investment Policy Review: Uganda. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2000c. World Investment Report 2000. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2000d. International Investment Instruments: A Compendium, vol. 5. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2000e. Twenty-two bilateral investment treaties signed at Sapporo (Japan), TAD/INF/PR/048 29/06/00.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2001a. Investment Policy Review: Ecuador. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2001b. World Investment Report 2001. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2001c. Environment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2002a. Investment and Innovation Policy Review: Ethiopia. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2002b. Progress report: Work Undertaken within UNCTAD's Work Programme on International Investment Agreements between the 10th Conference of UNCTAD, Bangkok, February 2000 and July 2000. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2002c, June, 12 to 14. ‘Report of the expert meeting on experiences with bilateral and regional approaches to multilateral cooperation in the area of long-term cross-border investment, particularly foreign direct investment’.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2002d. Investment Policy Review: Tanzania. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2003a. Investment Policy Review: Ghana. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2003b. Investment Policy Review: Lesotho. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2003c. Investment Policy Review: Nepal. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2003d. World Investment Report 2003. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2003e. Course on Dispute Settlement: International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2004. World Investment Report 2004. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2005a. World Investment Report 2005. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2005b. Investment Policy Review: Kenya. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2005c. South-South Cooperation in International Investment Agreements. Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2005d. Investment Policy Review: Brazil. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2006a. World Investment Report 2006. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2006b. Investment Policy Review: Botswana. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2006c. Investment Policy Review: Colombia. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2006d. Investment Policy Review: Nigeria. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2006e. Investment Policy Review: Rwanda. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2006f. ‘The entry into force of bilateral investment treaties (BITs)’, IIA Monitor 3.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2007a. Investment Policy Review: Dominican Republic. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2007b. Investment Policy Review: Zambia. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2007c. Worldwide Survey of Foreign Affiliates, Occasional Note. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2007d. Investor-State Dispute Settlement and Impact on Investment Rulemaking. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2007e. International Investment Rule-Making: Stocktaking, Challenges and the Way Forward. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2009a. The Role of International Investment Agreements in Attracting Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2009b. ‘The impact on foreign direct investment of BITs’, in Sauvant, Karl and Sachs, Lisa (eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

UNCTAD, 2009c. Investment Policy Review: Dominican Republic. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2009d. ‘Recent developments in international investment agreements (2008–June 2009)’, IIA Monitor 3.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2010a. Investment Policy Review: Sierra Leone. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2010b. Investment Policy Review: Guatemala. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2010c. Investor-State Disputes: Prevention and Alternatives to Arbitration. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2011a. Investment Policy Review: Guatemala. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2011b. Investment Policy Review: Ethiopia. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2011c. ‘Interpretation of IIAs: what states can do’, IIA Issues 3.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2012. Investment Policy Review: Mozambique. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2013a. World Investment Report. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2013b. International Investment Policy Making in Transition: Challenges and Opportunities of Treaty Renewal. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2013c. Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: In Search of a Roadmap. Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2014a, April. ‘Recent developments in investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS)’.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, 2014b. Investor-State Dispute Settlement, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II. Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar

UNCTC, 1983. ‘Report on ninth session’, Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, supplement no. 7a, E/C.10/1983/15.Google Scholar

UNCTC, 1984a. ‘Bilateral, regional and international arrangements on matters relating to transnational corporations’, Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, E.C.10/1984/8.Google Scholar

UNCTC, 1984b. ‘Report on the tenth session’, Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, supplement no. 8, E/C.10/1984/20.Google Scholar

UNCTC, 1985. ‘Report on the eleventh session’, Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, supplement no. 8, E/C.10/1985/19.Google Scholar

UNCTC, 1986. ‘Bilateral arrangements and agreements related to transnational corporations’, Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, E/C.10/1986/7.Google Scholar

UNCTC, 1987. ‘Report on the thirteenth session’, Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, supplement no. 9, E/C.10/1987/16.Google Scholar

UNCTC, 1988a. Bilateral Investment Treaties. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTC, 1988b, March 10. Joint Ventures as a Form of International Economic Co-operation, Background Documents of the High-Level Seminar Organized by the United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations in Co-operation with the State Foreign Economic Commission, and the State Committee on Science and Technology of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic, Moscow. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTC, 1991a. ‘Other international, regional and bilateral arrangements and agreements related to transnational corporations’, Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, E/C.10/1991/9.Google Scholar

UNCTC, 1991b.‘Report on seventeenth session’, Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, supplement no. 10, E/C.10/1991/17.Google Scholar

UNCTC, 1992a. ‘Report on eighteenth session’, Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, supplement no. 6, E/1992/26.Google Scholar

UNCTC, 1992b. The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Survey of the Evidence. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

UNCTC, 1993a. ‘Report on nineteenth session’, Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, supplement no. 10, E/1993/30.Google Scholar

UNCTC, 1993b. ‘International framework for transnational corporations’, Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, E/C.10/1993/8.Google Scholar

UNCTC and ICC, 1992. Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1959–1991. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

United States Department of State, 2009, September 30. Advisory committee on international economic policy submits report on U.S. model bilateral investment treaty, available at www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2009/sept/130097.htm.Google Scholar

United States Intergovernmental Policy Advisory Committee (IGPAC), 2004, March 12. Advisory Committee Report to the President, the Congress and the United States Trade Representative on the US-Australia Free Trade Agreement’.Google Scholar

USAID, 1990, July. ‘Private sector investment climate assessment of Balochistan’, available at http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNABU894.pdf.Google Scholar

Van Harten, Gus, 2007. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Van Harten, Gus, 2010. ‘Five justifications for investment treaties: a critical discussion’, Trade, Law and Development 2(1): 19–58.Google Scholar

Van Harten, Gus, 2013. Sovereign Choices and Sovereign Constraints: Judicial Restraint in Investment Treaty Arbitration. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vandevelde, Kenneth, 1988a. ‘The bilateral investment program of the United States’, Cornell International Law Journal 21(2): 201–76.Google Scholar

Vandevelde, Kenneth, 1988b. ‘Treaty interpretation from a negotiator's perspective’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 21, 281.Google Scholar

Vandevelde, Kenneth, 1992a. ‘The BIT program: a fifteen-year appraisal’, American Society of International Law Proceedings 86, 532–9.Google Scholar

Vandevelde, Kenneth, 1992b.United States Investment Treaties. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Vandevelde, Kenneth, 1993. ‘U.S. bilateral investment treaties: the second wave’, Michigan Journal of International Law 14(4): 621–704.Google Scholar

Vandevelde, Kenneth, 1998a. ‘Sustainable liberalism and the international investment regime’, Michigan Journal of International Law 19(2): 373–400.Google Scholar

Vandevelde, Kenneth, 1998b. ‘The political economy of a bilateral investment treaty’, American Journal of International Law 92(4): 621–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vandevelde, Kenneth, 1998c. ‘Investment liberalization and economic development: the role of bilateral investment treaties’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 36(2): 501–28.Google Scholar

Vandevelde, Kenneth, 2006. ‘Investment arbitration and sustainable development: good intentions—or effective results?’ International Environment Agreements 6, 459–66.Google Scholar

Vandevelde, Kenneth, 2007. ‘The present state of research carried out by the English-speaking section of the Centre for Studies and Research’, in Kahn, Philippe and Wälde, Thomas (eds.), New Aspects of International Investment Law. Hague: Martinus Neijhoff.Google Scholar

Vandevelde, Kenneth, 2009. U.S. International Investment Agreements. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasciannie, Stephen, 1992. ‘Bilateral investment treaties and civil strife: the AAPL/Sri Lanka arbitration’, Netherlands International Law Review 29, 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vernon, Raymond, 1971. Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of U.S. Enterprises. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Vertzberger, Yaacov, 1998. Risk-Taking and Decision Making: Foreign Military Intervention Decisions. Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Veselá, Gita, 2009. ‘Bilateral investment treaty overview – Czech Republic’, available at www.investmentclaims.com.Google Scholar

Vickers, Brandan, 2002, February. ‘Foreign direct investment (FDI) regime of South Africa’, Institute for Global Dialogue.Google Scholar

Vicuña, Francisco, 2002. ‘Regulatory expropriations in international law: Carlos Calvo, honorary NAFTA citizen’, New York University Environmental Law Journal 11(1): 19–34.Google Scholar

Vis-Dunbar, Damon, 2006, August 23. ‘French investor criticizes governments’ handling of Cambodian dispute’, Investment Treaty News.Google Scholar

Voss, Jurgen, 1981. ‘The protection and promotion of European private investment in developing countries – an approach towards a concept for a European policy on foreign investment. A German contribution’, Common Market Law Review 18(3): 363–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waibel, Michael, and Wu, Yanhui, 2014. ‘Are arbitrators political?’ Working paper on file with author.Google Scholar

Wakslak, Cheryl, and Trope, Yaacov, 2009. ‘The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates’, Psychological Science 20(1): 52–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wälde, Thomas, 2000. ‘Treaties and regulatory risk in infrastructure investment’, Journal of World Trade 34(2): 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, Herman, 1956. ‘Treaties for the encouragement and protection of foreign investment: present United States practice’, The American Journal of Comparative Law 5(2): 229–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wall, Tim, 1996. ‘New investment rules cause concern’, Africa Recovery 10, 3.Google Scholar

Walter, Andrew, 2001. ‘NGOs, business, and international investment: the multilateral agreement on investment, Seattle, and beyond’, Global Governance 7(1): 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walter, Stefanie, and Willett, Thomas, 2012. ‘Delaying the inevitable: a political economy approach to currency defenses and depreciation’, Review of International Political Economy 19(1): 114–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wedel, Janine, 1998. Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Weiler, Todd, 2002. ‘NAFTA investment arbitration and the growth of international economic law’, Canadian Business Law Journal 36(3): 405–35.Google Scholar

Weinstein, Neil, 1989. ‘Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior’, Psychological Bulletin 3105(1): 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wellhausen, Rachel, 2015. ‘Investor–state disputes: when can governments break contracts?’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 59(2): 239–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wellhausen, Rachel and Johns, Leslie, 2014. ‘Modern day merchant guilds supply chains and informal property rights enforcement’, working paper.Google Scholar

Wells, Louis, 2010. ‘The emerging global regime for investment: a response’, Harvard International Law Journal [online] 52, 42–57.Google Scholar

Wells, Louis, and Ahmed, Rafiq, 2006. Making Foreign Investment Safe: Property Rights and National Sovereignty. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

West, Gerald, 1999. ‘Political risk investment insurance: a renaissance’, Journal of Project Finance 5(2): 27–36.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt, 2006. Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt, 2008. ‘Toward a new theory of institutional change’, World Politics 60(2): 281–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar