Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-grvzd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-16T05:59:24.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Asya C. Sigelman
Asya C. Sigelman
Affiliation:
Bryn Mawr College, Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Pindar's Poetics of Immortality , pp. 183 - 198
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adkins, A. W. H. 1972. Moral Values and Political Behaviour in Ancient Greece: From Homer to the End of the Fifth Century. London.Google Scholar
Agocs, P. 2009. “Memory and Forgetting in Pindar’s Seventh Isthmian,” in Dolezalova 2009, 29–68.Google Scholar
Agocs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R. (eds.) 2012. Reading the Victory Ode. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alber, J., Iversen, S., Nielsen, H. S., and Richardson, B. 2010. “Unnatural Narratives, Unnatural Narratology: Beyond Mimetic Models,” Narrative 18, 113–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, T. W. (ed.) 1931. Homeri Ilias. Oxford.Google Scholar
Aloni, A. 2009. “Elegy,” in Budelmann 2009, 168–88.Google Scholar
Andersen, O. 1990. “The Making of the Past in the Iliad,” HSCP 93, 25–45.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. 1905. On Translating Homer, New Edition. London.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2009a. “Narratology, Deixis, and the Performance of Choral Lyric: On Pindar’s First Pythian Ode,” in Grethlein and Rengakos 2009, 241–74.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2009b. “Apollo and His Oracle in Pindar’s Epinicians: Poetic Representations, Politics, and Ideology,” in Athanassaki, Martin, and Miller 2009, 405–71.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2004. “Deixis, Performance, and Poetics in Pindar’s First Olympian Ode,” in Felson-Rubin 2004a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanassaki, L., Martin, R. P., and Miller, J. F. (eds.) 2009. Apolline Politics and Poetics. Athens.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. 1946. Mimesis. Dargestellte Wirklichkeit in der abendländischen Literatur. Bern. English translation: Trask, W. R. 1968. Princeton.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Austin, N. 1975. Archery at the Dark of the Moon: Poetic Problems in Homer’s Odyssey. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bagordo, A. and Zimmermann, B. (eds.) 2000. Bakchylides: 100 Jahre nach seiner Entdeckung in Zetemata 106. Munich.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (Emerson, C. and Holquist, M. transl.) 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. 2005. Pointing at the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. 1997. Poetry in Speech: Orality and Homeric Discourse. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. 1993. “Discourse and Performance: Involvement, Visualization and ‘Presence’ in Homeric Poetry,” CA 12, 1–29.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. and Kahane, A. (eds.) 1997. Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bal, M. 1985. Narratology. Toronto and London.Google Scholar
Bal, M. 1978. “Mise en abyme et iconicité,” Littérature 29, 116–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkhuizen, J. H. 1975. Etimologisering by Pindaros, PhD Diss., Pretoria.Google Scholar
Beck, D. 2008. “Character-Quoted Direct Speech in the Iliad,” Phoenix 62, 162–83.Google Scholar
Becker, O. 1937. Das Bild des Weges und Verwandte Vorstellungen im Frühgriechischen Denken. Berlin.Google Scholar
Beecroft, A. J. 2006. “‘This Is Not a True Story’: Stesichorus’s ‘Palinode’ and the Revenge of the Epichoric,” TAPA 136, 47–69.Google Scholar
Belmont, D. E. 1962. “Early Greek Guest-Friendship and Its Role in Homer’s Odyssey,” PhD Diss., Princeton University.Google Scholar
Ben-Porat, Z. 1992. “Poetics of the Homeric Simile and the Theory of (Poetic) Simile,” Poetics Today 13, 737–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, P. 1970. “Der Atridenmythos in Epos, Lyrik, und Drama.” PhD Diss., Erlangen/Nürnberg.Google Scholar
Bethlehem, L. S. 1996. “Simile and Figurative Language,” Poetics Today 17, 203–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. 1954. “Metaphor,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 55, 273–94.Google Scholar
Block, E. 1982. “The Narrator Speaks: Apostrophe in Homer and Vergil,” TAPA 112, 7–22.Google Scholar
Boeckh, A. and Dissen, L. (ed.) 1821. Pindari Opera Quae Supersunt. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.) 2001. The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeke, H. 2007. The Value of Victory in Pindar’s Odes: Gnomai, Cosmology, and the Role of the Poet. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boisacq, E. 1923. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A. 2004. “Relative Pronouns and Memory: Pindar beyond Syntax,” HSCP 102, 41–68.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A. 2000. “Sull’idea di sotterfugio orale negli epinici pindarici,” QUCC 66, 69–86.Google Scholar
Booth, W. 1961. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. 1993. “Lies, Fiction and Slander in Early Greek Poetry,” in Gill and Wiseman 1993, 1–37.Google Scholar
Bowie, E., De Jong, I., and Nünlist, R. (eds.) 2004. Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative. 1: Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. 1970. “Xenophanes and the Luxury of Colophon,” in Bowra, C. M. 1970, On Greek Margins Oxford and Brandenburg.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. 1964. Pindar. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. 1936. “Pindar, Pythian XI,” CQ 30, 129–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. (ed.) 2003. Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braswell, B. K. 1988. A Commentary on the Fourth Pythian Ode of Pindar. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Bräuning, F. G. 1881. De Adjectivis Compositis apud Pindarum. Berlin.Google Scholar
Brelich, A. 1958. Gli eroi greci: Un problema storico religioso. Rome.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M. 1990. “Pindar’s Paradoxical ἐγώ and a Recent Controversy about the Performance of his Epinicia,” in Slings 1990, 41–58.Google Scholar
Briand, M. 2008. “La limite et l’envol: les fins paradoxales des épinicies de Pindare,” in Bureau and Nicolas 2008.Google Scholar
Brillante, C. 1990. “History and the Historical Interpretation of Myth,” in Edmunds 1990, 91–140.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. (ed.) 2009. The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulman, P. 1992. Phthonos in Pindar. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bundy, E. 1962. Studia Pindarica. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bureau, B. and Nicolas, C. (eds.) 2008. Commencer et finir: débuts et fins dans les littératures grecque, latine et néolatine. Actes du colloque organisé les 29 et 30 septembre 2006 par l’Université Jean Moulin-Lyon. Lyon.Google Scholar
Burgess, D. 1993. “Food, Sex, Money and Poetry in Olympian 1,” Hermes 121, 35–44.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. P. 2005. Pindar’s Songs for Young Athletes of Aigina. Oxford and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, A. P. 1983. Three Archaic Poets: Archilochus, Alcaeus, Sappho. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Burton, R. W. B. 1962. Pindar’s Pythian Odes: Essays in Interpretation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1996. Mythe et histoire dans l’antiquité grecque: la création symbolique d’une colonie. Lausanne.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1995. The Craft of Poetic Speech in Ancient Greece. Cornell.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1990. “Narrating the Foundation of a City: The Symbolic Birth of Cyrene,” in Edmunds 1990, 277–341.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. A. 1992. Greek Lyric: Bacchylides, Corinna, and Others, Loeb Library. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Carey, C. 2009. “Genre, Occasion, Performance,” in Budelmann 2009, 21–38.Google Scholar
Carey, C. 1991. “The Victory Ode in Performance: the Case for the Chorus,” CP 86, 192–200.Google Scholar
Carey, C. 1989. “The Performance of the Victory Ode,” AJP 110, 545–65.Google Scholar
Carne-Ross, D. S. 1985. Pindar. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Carne-Ross, D. S. 1976. “Weaving with Points of Gold: Pindar’s Sixth Olympian,” Arion 3, 5–44.Google Scholar
Carson, A. 1998. Autobiography of Red: A Novel in Verse. New York.Google Scholar
Chadwick, N. K. 1942. Poetry and Prophecy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Chamoux, F. 1962. Cyrène sous la Monarchie des Battiades. Paris.Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. 1968–1980. Dictionnaire étymologique de la Langue grecque. Histoire des mots. Paris.Google Scholar
Chatman, S. 1978. Story and Discourse. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Cingano, E. 2003. “Entre skolion et enkomion: réflexions sur le ‘genre’ et la performance de la lyrique chorale greque,” in Jouanna and Leclant 2003, 17–46.Google Scholar
Cingano, E. 1993. “Indizi di Esecuzione corale in Stesicoro,” in Pretagostini 1993, 347–61.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. 1999. “Pindar’s Sympotic Epinicia,” QUCC 62, 25–34.Google Scholar
Cook, R. 1974. Tree of Life: Image for the Cosmos. New York.Google Scholar
Crotty, K. 1982. Song and Action: The Victory Odes of Pindar. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Culler, J. 1981. The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Currie, B. 2013. “The Pindaric First Person in Flux,” CA 32, 243–82.Google Scholar
Currie, B. 2005. Pindar and the Cult of Heroes. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, B. 2004. “Reperformance Scenarios for Pindar’s Odes,” in Mackie 2004, 49–70.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 2004. “Past Future and Present Past,” in Felson-Rubin 2004a, 267–94.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 1994. “First-Person Problems in Pindar,” BICS 39, 117–39.Google Scholar
Dällenbach, L. 1977, Le récit spéculaire, essai sur la mise en abyme. Paris.Google Scholar
Davies, M. 1988. “Monody, Choral Lyric, and the Tyranny of the Hand-Book,” CQ 38, 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, I. 1997. “Homer and Narratology,” in Morris and Powell 1997, 305–25.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. 1987. Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. 1985. “Scar,” CQ 35, 517–18.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. and Nünlist, R. (eds.) 2007. Time in Ancient Greek Literature. Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, I., Nünlist, R., and Bowie, A. (eds.) 2004. Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative. Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depew, M. 2000. “Enacted and Represented Dedications: Genre and Greek Hymn,” in Obbink and Depew 2000.Google Scholar
Des Places, E. 1947. Le pronom chez Pindare; recherches philologiques et critiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1996. The Masters of Truth in Archaic Greece, Second Edition. New York.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P. (Wissing, P. transl.) 1998. The Cuisine of Sacrifice among the Greeks. Chicago.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. and Werth, A. 1971. “Athena and the Mastery of the Horse,” History of Religions 11, 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, G. J. 1977. “Phaeacian Manners,” Mnemosyne Fourth Series 30, Fasc. 2, 113–21.Google Scholar
Dignas, B. and Trampedach, K. (eds.) 2008. Practitioners of the Divine: Greek Priests and Religious Officials from Homer to Heliodorus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1951. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolezalova, L. (ed.) 2009. Strategies of Remembrance from Pindar to Hölderlin. Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
Doležel, L. 1998. Heterocosmica. Fiction and Possible Worlds. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Dornseiff, F. 1933. Die archaische Mythenerzählung. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornseiff, F. 1921. Pindars Stil. Berlin.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. 2001. The Raft of Odysseus: The Ethnographic Imagination of Homer’s Odyssey. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1964. “The Poetry of Archilochus,” in Archiloque (Entretiens Hardt 10), 181–212 (article) and 213–22 (discussion). Vandoeuvres-Geneva.Google Scholar
Drachmann, A. B. (ed.) 1964. Scholia Vetera in Pindari Carmina. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dubielzig, U. 1995. “Wie Kallimachos seine Gegner bezeichnet hat (Call. fr. 1, 7 Pfeiffer),” RhM 138, 337–46.Google Scholar
Dubrow, H. 2006. “The Interplay of Narrative and Lyric: Competition, Cooperation, and the Case of the Anticipatory Amalgam,” Narrative 14, 254–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchemin, J. 1955. Pindare: Poète et Prophète. Paris.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (ed.) 1990. Approaches to Greek Myth. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. 1987. Homer: Poet of the Iliad. Baltimore and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M. W. 1966. “Some Features of Homeric Craftsmanship,” TAPA 97, 15–179.Google Scholar
Egan, R. B. 1983. “On the Relevance of Orestes in Pindar’s Eleventh Pythian,” Phoenix 37, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliade, M. 2004. Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy. Princeton.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Faraone, C. 2011. “Hexametrical Incantation as Oral and Written Phenomena,” in Lardinois, Blok, and van der Poel 2011, 191–204.Google Scholar
Farenga, V. 1977. “Pindaric Craft and the Writing of Pythia IV,” Helios 5, 3–37.Google Scholar
Farnell, L. R. 1932. The Works of Pindar. London.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. 2012. “Bacchylidean Myths,” in Agocs, Carey, and Rawles 2012, 321–43.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. 2007. Bacchylides: Politics, Performance, Poetic Tradition. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felson-Rubin, N. (ed.) 2004a. Special Issue: The Poetics of Deixis in Alcman, Pindar, and Other Lyric in Arethusa 37.Google Scholar
Felson-Rubin, N. 2004b. “The Poetic Effects of Deixis in Pindar’s Ninth Pythian Ode,” in Felson-Rubin 2004a, 365–389.Google Scholar
Felson-Rubin, N. 1999. “Vicarious Transport: Fictive Deixis in Pindar’s Olympian Four,” HSCP 99, 1–31.Google Scholar
Felson-Rubin, N. 1984. “The Epinician Speaker in Pindar’s First Olympian: Toward a Model for Analyzing Character in Ancient Choral Lyric,” Poetics Today 5, 377–97.Google Scholar
Felson-Rubin, N. 1980. “Pindar’s Creation of Epinician Symbols: Olympians 7 and 6,” CW 74, 67–87.Google Scholar
Felson-Rubin, N. 1980. “Olympian 7: the Toast and the Future Prayer,” Hermes 108, 248–52.Google Scholar
Festugière, A.-J. 1949. “Le sens philosophique du mot aiôn,” La Parola del Passato 4, 172–89.Google Scholar
Finglass, P. J. 2007. Pindar, Pythian Eleven, Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelberg, M. 1990. “A Creative Oral Poet and the Muse,” AJP 111, 293–303.Google Scholar
Finley, J. H. 1955. Pindar and Aeschylus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finley, M. I. 1954. The World of Odysseus. New York.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. 1998. “‘Milly Bloom, Fairhaired, Greenvested, Slimsandalled’: Joyce’s Compound Adjectives and the Oxford English Dictionary,” in Frehner and Zeller 1998, 171–79.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 1987. Agonistic Poetry: The Pindaric Mode in Pindar, Horace, Hölderlin, and the English Ode. Berkeley and Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, M. 2008. The Seer in Ancient Greece. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Fogelin, R. J. 1994. “Metaphors, Similes and Similarity,” in Hintikka 1994, 23–39.Google Scholar
Fogelmark, S. 1972. Studies in Pindar, with Particular Reference to Paean VI and Nemean VII. Lund.Google Scholar
Ford, A. 2002. The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. 1992. Homer. Poetry of the Past. New York.Google Scholar
Foxhall, L. 2012. “Family Time: Temporality, Gender, and Materiality in Ancient Greece,” in Marincola, Llewellyn-Jones, and Maciver 2012, 183–206.Google Scholar
Fraccaroli, G. 1894. Le Odi di Pindaro. Nerona.Google Scholar
Fränkel, E. 1972. “ ‘Pindaro senza lacrime.’ Dalle esercitazioni di Eduard Fraenkel, Bari 1967,” Belfagor 27, 78–96.Google Scholar
Frame, D. 1978. The Myth of Return in Early Greek Epic. New Haven.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1975. (Hadas, M. and Willis, J. transl.) Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy. New York and London.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1955a. Wege und Formen frühgriechischen Denkens: Literarische und philosophiegeschichtliche Studien, Second Edition. Munich.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1955b. “Die Zeitauffassung in der Frühgriechischen Literatur,” Wege und Formen Frühgriechischen Denkens. München, 1–22.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1955c. “ΕΦΗΜΕΡΟΣ als Kennwort für die Menschliche Natur,” Wege und Formen Frühgriechischen Denkens. München, 23–39.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. 1921. Die Homerischen Gleichnisse. Gottingen.Google Scholar
Frehner, R. and Zeller, U. (ed.) 1998. A Collideorscape of Joyce: Festschrift for Fritz Senn. Dublin.Google Scholar
Gantz, T. 1978. “Pindar’s First Olympian: The Masters of Darkness,” Rivista di Studi Classici 26, 24–39.Google Scholar
García, J. F. 2002. “Symbolic Action in the Homeric Hymns: The Theme of Recognition,” CA 21, 5–39.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 2004. Métalepse: De la figure à la fiction. Paris.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (Lewin, J. E. transl.) 1980. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (Lewin, J. E. 1972. “Métonymie chez Proust,” in Genette, G. Figures III. Paris, 41–63.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. (Cole, A. T. transl.) 1988. Poetry and Its Public in Ancient Greece: From Homer to the Fifth Century. Baltimore and London (Italian original: Rome and Bari 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentili, B. and Paioni, G. (eds.) 1985. Oralita, cultura, litteratura, discorso. Atti del Convegno internazionale. Urbino.Google Scholar
Georgoudi, S. 2002. “Gaia/Gê. Entre mythe, culte et ideologie,” in des Bouvrie, S. (ed.), Myth and Symbol I: Symbolic Phenomena in Ancient Greek Culture. Papers from the First International Symposium on Symbolism at the University of Tromsø, June 4–7, 1998, 113–34.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. E. (ed.) 1984. Greek Poetry and Philosophy. Studies in Honor of Leonard Woodbury. Chico, CA.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. E. 1982. Pindar’s Olympian One: A Commentary. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, D. E. 1962. “What Time Can Do (Pindar, Nemean 1.46–47),” TPAPA 93, 30–33.Google Scholar
Giannini, P. 1976. “A Proposito di Pindaro, Pyth. 4, 25–27,” QUCC 22, 77–81.Google Scholar
Gide, A. 1943. Journal I (1889–1912). Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Gildersleeve, B. L. (translation and commentary) 1885. Pindar. The Olympian and Pythian Odes. New York.Google Scholar
Gildersleeve, B. L. 1883. “Studies in Pindaric Syntax. III. The Aorist and Imperfect,” AJP 4, 158–65.Google Scholar
Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.) 1993. Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Exeter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1983. “Narrative Structure in Bacchylides 5,” Eranos 81, 65–81.Google Scholar
Gray, D. H. F. 1947. “Homeric Epithets for Things,” CQ 41, 109–21.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2002. Inventing “Homer”: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J. 2009. “Greek Lyric and Early Greek Literary History,” in Budelmann 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greengard, C. 1980. The Structure of Pindar’s Epincian Odes. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2011. “Divine, Human and Poetic Time in Pindar, ‘Pythian’ 9,” Mnemosyne 64, 383–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A. (eds.) 2009. Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, M. 1983. “Personality in Hesiod,” CA 2, 37–65.Google Scholar
Griffith, R. D. 1993. “In the Dark Backward: Time in Pindaric Narrative,” Poetics Today 14, 607–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, R. D. 1986. “The Mind is its Own Place: Pindar Olympian 1. 57 f.,” GRBS 27, 5–13.Google Scholar
Gundert, H. 1978. Pindar und Sein Dichterberuf (photo reprint of the 1935 Frankfurt edition). Utrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, E. M. 1989. Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harvey, A. E. 1957. “Homeric Epithets in Greek Lyric Poetry,” CQ 7, 206–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, M. and Lefkowitz, M. 1991. “Epinician Performance,” CP 86, 173–91.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1975. Aesthetics. Knox, T., tr. Oxford.Google Scholar
Herington, J. 1984. “Pindar’s Eleventh Pythian Ode and Aeschylus’ Agamemnon,” in Gerber 1984, 137–46.Google Scholar
Herman, D. 2009. Basic Elements of Narrative. Chichester, UK, and Malden MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, D. 2005. “Storyworld,” in Herman, D. Manfred, J., and Ryan, M.-L. (eds.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. London, 569–70.Google Scholar
Herman, D. 2002. Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
Herman, G. 1987. Ritualised Friendship and the Greek City. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. (ed.) 1994. Aspects of Metaphor, Synthese Library 238. Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobden, F. “Enter the Divine: Sympotic Performance and Religious Experience,” in Lardinois, Blok, and van der Poel 2011, 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, A. 1981. Epic Verse before Homer: Three Studies. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hoey, T. 1965. “Fusion in Pindar,” HSCP 70, 235–62.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. 2004. Thucydides and Pindar. Historical Narrative and the World of Epinikian Poetry. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornblower, S. and Morgan, C. (eds.) 2007. Pindar’s Poetry, Patrons, and Festivals–from Archaic Greece to the Roman Empire. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howie, J. G. 1983. “The Revision of Myth in Pindar Olympian 1,” in Cairns, F. (ed.), Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 4. Liverpool, 277–313.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 2004. “The Dissemination of Epinician Lyric: Pan-Hellenism, Reperformance, Written Texts” in Mackie 2004, 71–94.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1987. “The ‘Cooking’ of Pelops: Pindar and the Process of Mythological Revisionism,” Helios 14, 3–21.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1986. “Pegasus’ Bridle and the Poetics of Pindar’s Thirteenth Olympian,” HSCP 90, 27–48.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1985. The Pindaric Mind: a Study of Logical Structure in Early Greek Poetry. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, P. 1993. La syntaxe de Pindare. Louvain and Paris.Google Scholar
Hurst, A. 1985a. “Aspects du temps chez Pindare,” in Hurst 1985b, 155–205.Google Scholar
Hurst, A. (ed.) 1985b. Pindare. Huit Exposés Suivis de Discussions. Vandoeuvres and Geneva.Google Scholar
Hurst, A. 1979. “ΩΤΕ ΜΕΛΙΣΣΑ: Sur deux poèmes du jeune Pindare (P. 10; O.14),” Teiresias Montréal, 71–77.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, L. 1984. Narcissistic Narrative: The Metafictional Paradox. London.Google Scholar
Illig, L. 1932. Zur Form der Pindarischen Erzählung. Berlin.Google Scholar
Innes, D. 2003. “Metaphor, Simile, and Allegory as Ornaments of Style,” in Boys-Stones 2003, 7–30.Google Scholar
Instone, S. J. 1986. “Pythian 11: Did Pindar Err?” CQ 36, 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigoin, J. 1993. Bacchylide. Dithyrambes, épinicies, fragments. Paris.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. 2005. Solon and Early Greek Poetry: The Politics of Exhortation. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, E. O. 1966. The Tree of Life: An Archaeological Study. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. L. 2003. Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 1995. “The Origins and Evolution of Epic Diction,” in Kirk 1995, 8–20.Google Scholar
Jefferson, A. 1983. “Mise en Abyme and the Prophetic in Narrative,” Style 12, 196–206.Google Scholar
Jessen, O. 1916. RE 9, 759.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. and Leclant, L. (eds.) 2003. Colloque: La Poésie Grecque Antique. Paris.Google Scholar
Kahane, A. 2005. Diachronic Dialogues: Authority and Continuity in Homer and the Homeric Tradition. Lanham.Google Scholar
Kahane, A. 1994. The Interpretation of Order: A Study in the Poetics of Homeric Repetition. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kakridis, J. T. 1930. “Die Pelopssage bei Pindar,” Philologus 85, 463–77.Google Scholar
Kakridis, H. J. 1963. La Notion de l’Amitié et de l’Hospitalité chez Homère. Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Käppel, L. 2000. “Bakchylides und das System der Chorlyrischen Gattungen im 5. Jh. v. Chr.,” in Bagordo and Zimmermann 2000, 11–27.Google Scholar
Käppel, L. 1992. Paian: Studien zur Geschichte einer Gattung. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. T. and Volk, K. 2000. “‘Mere Bellies’? A New Look at Theogony 26–8,” JHS 120:122–31.Google Scholar
Katz, M. 1991. Penelope’s Renown: Meaning and Indeterminacy in the Odyssey. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G. S. (ed.) 1995. The Iliad: A Commentary, Vol. iv. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1970. Myth: Its Meaning and Functions in Ancient and Other Cultures. Berkeley and Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1966a. “The Structure of the Homeric Hexameter,” YCS 20, 76–104.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1966b. “Verse-Structure and Sentence-Structure in Homer,” YCS 20, 105–52.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, G. 1984. “Blame and Envy in Pindaric Epinician,” in Gerber 1984.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, G. 1963. “Studia Pindarica by Elroy L. Bundy,” Gnomon 35, 130–33.Google Scholar
Knowlton, T. and Vail, G. 2010. “Hybrid Cosmologies in Mesoamerica: A Reevaluation of the Yax Cheel Cab, a Maya World Tree,” Ethnohistory 57, 709–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, P. E. 1984. “Sappho, fr. 31 LP and Catullus 51: A Suggestion,” QUCC 17, 97–102.Google Scholar
Köhnken, A. 1985. “‘Meilichos Orga’: Liebesthematik und Aktueller Sieg in der Neunten Pythischen Ode Pindars,” in Hurst 1985b, 71–116.Google Scholar
Köhnken, A. 1983. “Time and Event in Pindar O. 1. 25–53,” in CA 2, Studies in Classical Lyric: A Homage to Elroy Bundy, 66–76.Google Scholar
Köhnken, A. 1976. “Die Narbe des Odysseus,” Antike und Abendland 22, 101–14.Google Scholar
Köhnken, A. 1974. “Pindar as Innovator. Poseidon Hippios and the Relevance of the Pelops Story in Olympian 1,” CQ 24, 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhnken, A. 1971. Die Funktion des Mythos bei Pindar. Interpretationen zu sechs Pindargedichten. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komornicka, A. 1976. “La notion du temps chez Pindare,” Eos 64, 5–15.Google Scholar
Komornicka, A. 1972. “Quelques remarques sur la notion d’Alatheia et Pseudos chez Pindare,” Eos 60, 235–253.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 1997. Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. and Rutter, N. K. (eds.) 2003. Envy, Spite and Jealousy: The Rivalrous Emotions in Ancient Greece. Edinburgh.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalzig, B. 2004. “Changing Choral Worlds: Song-Dance and Society in Athens and Beyond,” in Murray and Wilson 2004, 39–65.Google Scholar
Krummen, E. 2009. “Alcman, Stesichorus and Ibycus,” in Budelmann 2009, 189–203.Google Scholar
Kugel, J. L. (ed.) 1990. Poetry and Prophecy: the Beginning of a Literary Tradition. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Gerth, B. 1955. Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache, Fourth Edition. Leverkusen.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 2005. “Choral Lyric as ‘Ritualization’: Poetic Sacrifice and Poetic Ego in Pindar’s Sixth Paian,” CA 24, 81–130.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 1992. “The Politics of ἁβϱοσύνη in Archaic Greece,” CA 11, 91–120.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 1991. The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Lardinois, A., Blok, J., and van der Poel, M. (eds.) 2011. Sacred Words. Orality, Literacy, and Religion (Mnemosyne Supplements, Orality and Literacy in the Ancient World, Vol. 8). Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, R. (transl.) 1961. The Iliad of Homer. Chicago.Google Scholar
Lattmann, C. 2010. Das Gleiche im Verschiedenen: Metapher des Sports und Lob des Siegers in Pindars Epinikien. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leavitt, J. 1997a. “Poetics, Prophetics, Inspiration,” in Leavitt 1997b, 1–60.Google Scholar
Leavitt, J. (ed.) 1997b. Poetry and Prophecy: The Anthropology of Inspiration. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebeck, A. 1971. The Oresteia: A Study in Language and Style. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lee, D. J. N. 1964. The Similes of the Iliad and the Odyssey Compared. Melbourne.Google Scholar
Lee, H. M. 1976. “The ΤΕΡΜΑ and the Javelin in Pindar, Nemean vii 70–3, and Greek Athletics,” JHS 96, 70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. 1988. “Who Sang Pindar’s Victory Odes?” AJP 109, 1–11.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. 1979. “Pindar’s Nemean XI,” JHS 99, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. 1976. The Victory Ode: An Introduction. Park Ridge, NJ.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. 1963. “Τω και εγω: The First Person in Pindar,” HSCP 67, 177–253.Google Scholar
Livingston, P. 2003. “Nested Art,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61, 233–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löfstedt, E. 1956. Syntactica: Studien und Beiträge auf historischen Syntax des Lateins. Lund.Google Scholar
Lohmann, D. 1970. Die Komposition der Reden in der Ilias (Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte, 6). Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. 2005. “Inside Out: In Defense of Form,” TAPA 135, 35–48.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. 1997. Horace’s Narrative Odes. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyle, E. B. 1982. “Dumezil’s Three Functions and Indo-European Cosmic Structure,” History of Religions 22, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machemer, G. A. 1993. “Medicine, Music, and Magic: The Healing Grace of Pindar’s Fourth Nemean,” HSCP 95, 113–41.Google Scholar
Mackie, C. J. 2004. Oral Performance and its Context (Mnemosyne Suppl.). Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, C. J. 2001. “The Earliest Jason. What’s in a Name?” G&R 48, 1–17.Google Scholar
Mackie, H. S. 2003. Graceful Errors: Pindar and the Performance of Praise. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLachlan, B. 1993. The Age of Grace: Charis in Early Greek Poetry. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, C. 1983. “Homer on Poetry and the Poetry of Homer,” in MacLeod, C., Collected Essays. Oxford.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (ed.) 2004. Bacchylides. A Selection. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Maingon, A. D. 1980. “Epic Convention in Stesichorus’ Geryoneis: SLG S15,” Phoenix 34, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, J. 1999. “Poseidon, Walls, and Narrative Complexity in the Homeric Iliad,” CQ 49, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manetti, G. (Richardson, C. transl.) 1993. Theories of the Sign in Classical Antiquity. Bloomington, IN.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, J. 1957. “Notes on the Logic of Simile, Metaphor and Analogy,” American Speech 32, 186–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marincola, J., Llewellyn-Jones, L., and Maciver, C. (eds.) 2012. Greek Notions of the Past in the Archaic and Classical Eras: History without Historians (Edinburgh Leventis Studies). Edinburgh.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. and Harré, R. 1982. “Metaphor in Science,” in Miall 1982, 89–105.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. 1997. “Similes and Performance,” in Bakker and Kahane 1997, 138–66.Google Scholar
Maslov, B. 2012. “Pindaric Temporality, Goethe’s ‘Augenblick,’ and the Invariant Plot of Tiutchev’s Lyric,” Comparative Literature 64, 356–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslov, B. 2009. “The Semantics of ἀοιδός and Related Compounds: Towards a Historical Poetics of Solo Performance in Archaic Greece,” Classical Antiquity 28, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, M. H. 1969. Ancient Rhetorical Theories of Simile and Comparison. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCracken, G. 1934. “Pindar’s Figurative Use of Plants,” AJP 55, 340–45.Google Scholar
Meautis, G. 1962. Pindare le Dorien. Paris and Neuchatel.Google Scholar
Meuli, K. 1935. “Scythica,” Hermes 70, 121–76.Google Scholar
Miall, D. S. (ed.) 1982. Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives. Brighton, Sussex: Harvester; Atlantic Highlands, NJ.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. 1995. “The Poet Appeals to His Muse: Homeric Invocations in the Context of Epic Performance,” CJ 91, 25–33.Google Scholar
Minton, W. 1962. “Invocation and Catalogue in Hesiod and Homer,” TPAPA 93, 188–212.Google Scholar
Minton, W. 1960. “Homer’s Invocations of the Muses: Traditional Patterns,” TPAPA 91, 292–309.Google Scholar
Moon, W. G. (ed.) 1983. Ancient Greek Art and Iconography. Madison. 159–70.Google Scholar
Morris, I. and Powell, B. (eds.) 1997. A New Companion to Homer. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, A. D. 2007a. Performances and Audiences in Pindar’s Sicilian Victory Odes. London.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D. 2007b. The Narrator in Archaic Greek and Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Most, G. W. 2012. “Poet and Public: Communicative Strategies in Pindar and Bacchylides,” in Agocs, Carey, and Rawles 2012, 249–76.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 2003. “Epinician Envies,” in Konstan and Rutter 2003, 123–42.Google Scholar
Moulton, C. 1977. Similes in the Homeric Poems. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Mullen, W. 1982. Choreia: Pindar and Dance. Princeton.Google Scholar
Murnaghan, S. 1987. Disguise and Recognition in the Odyssey. Princeton.Google Scholar
Murray, A. T. (tr.) 1924. Homer, Iliad, Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Murray, P. 1981. “Poetic Inspiration in Early Greece,” JHS 101, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, P. and Wilson, P. (eds.) 2004. Music and the Muses: The Culture of Mousike in the Classical Athenian City. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G. 1990a. Pindar’s Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G. 1990b. “Ancient Greek Poetry, Prophecy, and the Concepts of Theory,” in Kugel 1990, 56–64.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1986. “Pindar’s Olympian 1 and the Aetiology of the Olympic Games,” TAPA 116, 71–88.Google Scholar
Newman, F. S. 1979. “The Relevance of the Myth in Pindar’s Eleventh Pythian,” Hellenika 31, 44–64.Google Scholar
Nieto Hernandez, M. P. 1993. “Heracles and Pindar,” Mètis 8, 75–102.Google Scholar
Nisetich, F. J. 1989. Pindar and Homer. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Nisetich, F. J. 1980. Pindar’s Victory Songs. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisetich, F. J. 1975. “Olympian 1.8–11: An Epinician Metaphor,” HSCP 79, 55–68.Google Scholar
Norwood, G. 1945. Pindar. Berkeley and Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2007. “Pindar and Bacchylides,” in De Jong and Nünlist 2007, 233–51.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 1988. Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. and Depew, M. (eds.) 2000. Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ortony, A. 1979a. “The Role of Similarity in Similes and Metaphors,” in Ortony 1979b, 186–204.Google Scholar
Ortony, A. (ed.) 1979b. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar
van Otterlo, W. A. 1944. Untersuchungen über Begriff, Anwendung und Entstehung der greiechischen Ringkomposition. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Park, A. 2013. “Truth and Genre in Pindar,” Classical Quarterly 63, 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, H. W. 1956. The Delphic Oracle. Oxford.Google Scholar
Parry, A. 1989. “Language and Characterization in Homer,” in Parry, A. (ed.), The Language of Achilles and Other Papers. Oxford, 301–26.Google Scholar
Parry, M. 1971. “Studies in the Epic Technique of Oral Verse-Making: I. Homer and Homeric Style,” in Parry, A. (ed.) The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry. Oxford, 278–79.Google Scholar
Patten, G. T. 2009. Pindar’s Metaphors. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Pavlou, M. 2012a. “Pindar and the Reconstruction of the Past,” in Marincola, Llewellyn-Jones, and Maciver 2012, 95–112.Google Scholar
Pavlou, M. 2012b. “Fathers in Absentia in Pindar’s Epinicians,” GRBS 52, 57–88.Google Scholar
Pavlou, M. 2011. “Past and Present in Pindar’s Religious Poetry,” in Lardinois, Blok, and van der Poel 2011, 59–78.Google Scholar
Pelliccia, H. 1995. Mind, Body, and Speech in Homer and Pindar. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peradotto, J. 1985. “Prophecy Degree Zero: Teiresias and the End of the Odyssey,” in Gentili and Paioni 1985, 429–59.Google Scholar
Peradotto, J. 1990. Man in the Middle Voice: Name and Narration in the Odyssey. Princeton.Google Scholar
Petropoulos, J. C. B. 1993. “Sappho the Sorceress: Another Look at fr. 1 (LP),” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 97, 43–56.Google Scholar
Pfeijffer, I. L. and Slings, S. R. (eds.) 1999. One Hundred Years of Bacchylides: Proceedings of a Colloquium Held in at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Pier, J. and Schaeffer, J.-M. (eds.) 2005. Métalepse: Entorses au pacte de la représentation. Paris.Google Scholar
Pinsent, J. 1969. Greek Mythology. New York.Google Scholar
Podlecki, A. 1984. The Early Greek Poets and Their Times. Vancouver.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podlecki, A. 1971. “Some Odyssean Similes,” G&R 18, 81–90.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. H. 1993. Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Press, M. D. 2012. “(Pytho)Gaia in Myth and Legend: The Goddess of the Ekron Inscription Revisited,” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 365, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pretagostini, R. (ed.) 1993. Tradizione e Innovazione nella Cultura Greca da Omero all’età Ellenistica, Vol. 1. Rome.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. 1987. Odysseus Polutropos: Intertextual Readings in the Odyssey and the Iliad. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Pulleyn, S. 1997. Prayer in Greek Religion. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pushkin, A. S. (Aitken, G. R. transl.) 1966 (Russian original published in 1837). The Complete Tales of Alexandr Sergeyevitch Pushkin. New York.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 2000. Horace’s Carmen Saeculare: Ritual Magic and the Poet’s Art. New Haven.Google Scholar
Quantin, F. 1992. “Gaia oraculaire: tradition et réalités,” Métis 7, 177–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Race, W. H. 1997. Pindar I (2 vols.: I Olympian Odes – Pythian Odes; II Nemean Odes – Isthmian Odes – Fragments). Loeb Classical Library 56 and 485. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Race, W. H. 1989. “Climactic Elements in Pindar’s Verse,” HSCP 92, 43–69.Google Scholar
Rauchenstein, R. 1847. “Ueber die Tendenz und Zeit der 11. Pythischen Ode,” Philologus 2, 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rengakos, A. 2000. “Zu Bakchylides’ Erzähltechnik,” in Bagordo and Zimmermann 2000, 101–12.Google Scholar
Retter, A. 2002. Das Prooimion von Pindars siebter olympischer Ode: Versuch einer integrierenden Lösung von Bezugsproblemen. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Richards, G. C. 1918. “Greek Compound Adjectives with a Verbal Element in Tragedy,” CQ 12, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, S. 1990. The Homeric Narrator. Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1975. La Métaphore Vive. Paris.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, A. 1981. “Relative Clause Formation in Ancient Greek,” in Bolkenstein, A. M. (ed.) Predication and Expression in Functional Grammar. London, 235–59.Google Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, S. 1982. “Ambiguity and Narrative Levels: Christine Brooke-Rose’s Thru,” Poetics Today 3, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, E. 1978. “Cyrene and Cheiron: The Myth of Pindar’s Ninth Pythian,” Phoenix 32, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, E. 1975. “Jason and Cheiron: The Myth of Pindar’s Fourth Pythian,” Phoenix 29, 205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D. 1984. Apollo and his Oracle in the Oresteia. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D., Dunn, F., and Fowler, D. (eds.) 1997. Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton.Google Scholar
Robert-Tornow, W. H. 1893. De Apium Mellisque Apud Veteres Significatione et Symbolica et Mythologica. Berlin.Google Scholar
Ron, M. 1987. “The Restricted Abyss: Nine Problems in the Theory of Mise en Abyme,” Poetics Today 8, 417–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, G. P. 1969. “The Unfriendly Phaeacians,” TAPA 100, 387–406.Google Scholar
Rose, P. W. 1974. “The Myth of Pindar’s First Nemean: Sportsmen, Poetry, and Paideia,” HSCP 78, 145–75.Google Scholar
Rösler, W. 1980. “Die Entdeckung der Fiktionalität,” Poetica 12, 283–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruck, C. and Matheson, W. 1965. “For Diagoras of Rhodes: Victory in Boxing (Pindar, ‘Olympia VII’),” Arion 4, 404–14.Google Scholar
Russel, C. 1979. “The Tree as a Kinship Symbol,” Folklore 90, 217–33.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. 2001. “The New Simonides: Towards a Commentary,” in Boedeker and Sider 2001, 167–192.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. 1997. “Odes and Ends: Closure in Greek Lyric,” in Roberts, Dunn, and Fowler 1997, 43–61.Google Scholar
Sandys, J. E. 1915. The Odes of Pindar: Including the Principal Fragments. Loeb Classical Library 56 and 485. London and New York.Google Scholar
Schachermeyr, F. 1950. Poseidon und die Entstehung des griechischen Gotterglaubens. Münich.Google Scholar
Schadewaldt, W. 1966. Iliasstudien. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Schadewaldt, W. 1928. Der Aufbau des Pindarischen Epinikion. Halle.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. J. 1998. “Speaking ‘Personae’ in Pindar’s Epinicia,” CFC 8, 147–84.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 2002. Listening to Homer: Tradition, Narrative, Audience. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scodel, R. 2001. “Poetic Authority and Oral Tradition in Hesiod and Pindar,” in Watson 2001, 109–38.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 1996. “Self-correction, Spontaneity and Orality in Archaic Poetry,” in Worthington 1996, 59–79.Google Scholar
Scott, W. C. 2009. The Artistry of the Homeric Simile. Hanover, NH.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. 2001. Oedipus Tyrannus: Tragic Heroism and the Limits of Knowledge. New York.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1998. Aglaia. The Poetry of Alcman, Sappho, Pindar, Bacchylides, and Corinna. Oxford.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1994. Singers, Heroes, and Gods in the Odyssey. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1986. Pindar’s Mythmaking: The Fourth Pythian Ode. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. 1985. “Messages to the Underworld: An Aspect of Poetic Immortalization in Pindar,” AJP 106, 199–212.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1976. “Bacchylides Reconsidered: Epithets and the Dynamic of Lyric Narrative,” QUCC 22, 99–130.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1974. “The Raw and the Cooked in Greek Literature: Structure, Values, Metaphor,” Classical Journal, 289–308.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1968. “Two Agonistic Problems in Pindar, Nemean 7.70–4 and Pythian 1.42–45,” GRBS 9, 31–45.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1964. “God and Man in Pindar’s First and Third Olympian Odes,” HSCP 68, 211–67.Google Scholar
Sevieri, R. 1999. “Un eroe in cerca d’identità: Oreste nella Pitica XI di Pindaro per Trasideo di Tebe,” MD 43, 77–110.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. R. 1991. “Womanufacture,” JRS 81, 36–49.Google Scholar
Shive, B. 1987. Naming Achilles. New York.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. 1922. “The Logic of the Homeric Simile,” CP 17, 240–59.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. 2003. “Metaphor and Metonymy: Aristotle, Jakobson, Ricoeur, and others,” in Boys-Stones 2003, 115–47.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. 1998. “Pindar’s Poetry and the Obligatory Crux: Isthmian 5.56–63, Text and Interpretation,” TAPA 128, 25–88.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. 1974. Interaction in Poetic Imagery with Special Reference to Early Greek Poetry. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, M. 1969. “The Chariot and the Bow as Metaphors for Poetry in Pindar’s Odes,” TPAPA 100, 437–73.Google Scholar
Slater, W. J. 1983. “Lyric Narrative: Structure and Principle,” CA, 117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, W. J. 1979. “Pindar and Hypothekai,” in Proceedings, Second International Conference on Boiotian Antiquities, 79–82.Google Scholar
Slater, W. J. 1969. “Futures in Pindar,” CQ 19, 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slings, S. R. (ed.) 1990. The Poet’s “I” in Archaic Greek Lyric. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Slings, S. R. 1989. “Poet’s Call and Poet’s Status in Archaic Greece and other Oral Cultures,” Listy Filologické 112, 72–80.Google Scholar
Snell, B. 1946a. “Pindars Hymnos auf Zeus,” in Die Entdeckung des Geistes. Studien zur Entstehung des Europäischen Denkens bei den Griechen. Göttingen, 82–94.Google Scholar
Snell, B. 1946b. Die Entdeckung des Geistes. Studien zur Entstehung des Europäischen Denkens bei den Griechen. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Snell, B. 1961. Poetry and Society: The Role of Poetry in Ancient Greece. Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Snell, B and Maehler, H. 1987 Pindarus, Pars I, Epinicia. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Stanford, W. B. 1963. The Ulysses Theme. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stanley, K. 1993. The Shield of Homer: Narrative Structure in the Iliad. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefos, A. 1975. Apollon dans Pindare. Athens.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. 1986. The Crown of Song: Metaphor in Pindar. London.Google Scholar
Stenger, J. 2004. Poetische Argumentation: Die Funktion der Gnomik in den Epinikien des Bakchylides. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, S. D. 2002. “Aspects of the ‘Fictive I’ in Pindar: Address to Psychic Entities,” Emerita 70, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, L. 2010. The Hidden Chorus: Echoes of Genre in Greek Lyric. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatsi, A. 2008. “On the Meaning of χρόνος in Pindar’s ‘Nemean’ 1.46,” Mnemosyne 61, 120–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thalmann, W. 1984. Conventions of Form and Thought in Early Greek Epic Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2007. “Fame, Memorial, and Choral Poetry: The Origins of Epinikian Poetry – an Historical Study,” in Hornblower and Morgan 2007, 141–66.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 1992. Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, A. 1984. Homer’s Iliad: Its Composition and the Motif of Supplication. Gottingen.Google Scholar
Thummer, E. 1968. Pindar. Die Isthmische Gedichte. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Toohey, P. 2004. Melancholy, Love, and Time. Boundaries of the Self in Ancient Literature. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trampedach, K. 2008. “Authority Disputed: The Seer in Homeric Epic,” in Dignas and Trampedach 2008, 207–30.Google Scholar
Treu, M. 1955. Von Homer zur Lyrik: Wandlungen des griechischen Weltbildes im Spiegel der Sprache, in Zetemata 12. München.Google Scholar
Uhlig, A. 2011. Script and Song in Pindar and Aeschylus, PhD Diss., Princeton.Google Scholar
Van Groningen, B. A. 1960. La Composition Littéraire Archaïque Grecque. Procédés et Réalisations. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. 1982. “Pindar’s Second Isthmian Ode: A Commentary,” Mnemosyne 35, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1998. “At Man’s Table: Hesiod’s Foundation Myth of Sacrifice,” in Detienne and Vernant 1998, 21–86.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1969. “Hestia-Hermes: The Religious Expression of Space and Movement among the Greeks,” Social Science Information 8, 131–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vivante, P. 1972. “On Time in Pindar,” Arethusa 5, 107–31.Google Scholar
Vivante, P. 1970. The Homeric Imagination. Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Vöhler, M. 2005. “‘Ich aber: Mythenkorrekturen in Pindars 1 Olympie,” in Vöhler and Seidensticker 2005, 19–35.Google Scholar
Vöhler, M. and Seidensticker, B. (eds.) 2005. Mythenkorrekturen: Zu einer paradoxalen Form der Mythenrezeption. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von der Mühll, P. (ed.) 1962. Homeri Odyssea. Basel.Google Scholar
Von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. 1886. Isyllos von Epidauros. Berlin.Google Scholar
Von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. 1922. Pindaros. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, J. 1920. Vorlesungen über Syntax. Basel.Google Scholar
Wathelet, P. 2004. “Ἀείδω, ἀοιδός, et leurs dérivés dans l’épopée homérique,” in López Férez, J. A. (ed.) La lengua científica griega: orígenes, desarrollo e influencia en las lenguas modernas europeas, Vol. 3. Madrid, 1–18.Google Scholar
Wathelet, P. 2000. “Dieux et enchantements dans l’épopée homérique,” in Moreau, A. and Turpin, J.-C. (eds.) La Magie, Actes du colloque international de Montpellier 25–27 Mars 1999, Vol. 2. Montpellier, 169–84.Google Scholar
Watson, J. (ed.) 2001. Speaking Volumes: Orality and Literacy in the Greek and Roman World. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. B. 2009. Pindar’s Verbal Art: An Ethnographic Study of Epinician Style. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1997. The East Face of Helicon. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M. L. 1971. “Stesichorus,” CQ 21, 302–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J. 2000. “The Semiotics of the Mise en Abyme,” in Fischer, O. and Nanny, M. (eds.), The Motivated Sign: Iconcity in Language and Literature. Amsterdam, 29–53.Google Scholar
Will, E. 1955. Korinthiaka: recherches sur l’histoire et la civilisation de Corinthe des origines aux gurres médiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Will, E. 1954. “Points de vue corinthiens sur la prehistoire du culte de Poseidon,” Bulletin de la Faculté des lettres de Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. R. 1980. “KAIROS as ‘Due Measure’,” Glotta 58, 177–204.Google Scholar
Wheeler, G. 2002. “Sing, Muse…: The Introit from Homer to Apollonius,” CQ 52, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhouse, W. J. 1930. The Composition of Homer’s Odyssey. Oxford.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. (ed.) 1996. Voice into Text. Leiden.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. 2002. The Roman Mistress: Ancient and Modern Representations. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyke, M. 1987. “Written Women: Propertius’ Scripta Puella,” JRS 77, 47–61.Google Scholar
Young, D. C. 1971. Pindar, Isthmian 7, Myth and Exempla. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, D. C. 1968. Three Odes of Pindar: A Literary Study of Pythian 11, Pythian 3, and Olympian 7. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, D. C. 1964. “Pindaric Criticism,” Minnesota Review 4, 584–41.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Asya C. Sigelman, Bryn Mawr College, Pennsylvania
  • Book: Pindar's Poetics of Immortality
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316471326.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Asya C. Sigelman, Bryn Mawr College, Pennsylvania
  • Book: Pindar's Poetics of Immortality
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316471326.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Asya C. Sigelman, Bryn Mawr College, Pennsylvania
  • Book: Pindar's Poetics of Immortality
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316471326.008
Available formats
×