Works Cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 September 2017
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Canonising ShakespeareStationers and the Book Trade, 1640–1740, pp. 245 - 246Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Works Cited
Alexander, Catherine M. S. 1998. ‘Province of Pirates: The Editing and Publication of Shakespeare’s Poems in the Eighteenth Century’, in Gondris, Joanna (ed.), Reading Readings: Essays on Shakespeare Editing in the Eighteenth Century. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, pp. 345–65.Google Scholar
Anon. 1726. Catalogue of the Library of the Late Learned Samuel Gibbes Esq; of Horsley in Essex. London.Google Scholar
Anon. 1908. Catalogue of the Pamphlets, Books, Newspapers, and Manuscripts Relating to the Civil War, the Commonwealth, and Restoration, Collected by George Thomason, 1640–1661. 2 vols. London: Printed by order of the trustees.Google Scholar
Anon. 1916. A Catalogue of the Shakespeare Exhibition Held in the Bodleian Library to Commemorate the Death of Shakespeare. Oxford: Bodleian Library.Google Scholar
Arber, Edward 1875–94. A Transcript of the Registers of the Company of Stationers 1554–1640 AD. 5 vols. London: Privately Printed.Google Scholar
Arber, Edward (ed.) 1903–6. The Term Catalogues, 1668–1709 A.D. 3 vols. London: Privately Printed.Google Scholar
Atkin, Tamara, and Smith, Emma 2014. ‘The Form and Function of Character Lists in Plays Printed Before the Closing of the Theatres’, Review of English Studies 65: 647–72.Google Scholar
Atkins, Carl D. 2007. ‘The Importance of Compositorial Error and Variation to the Emendation of Shakespeare’s Texts: A Bibliographic Analysis of Benson’s 1640 Text of Shakespeare’s Sonnets’, Studies in Philology 104.3: 306–39.Google Scholar
Baker, David 1998. ‘Cavalier Shakespeare: The 1640 Poems of John Benson’, Studies in Philology 95.2: 152–73.Google Scholar
Barnard, John 1999. ‘Introduction’, in Barnard, John and McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Vol. IV: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Barnard, John 2001. ‘London Publishing, 1640–1660: Crisis, Continuity, and Innovation’, Book History 4: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Henrietta C. 1913. ‘Quarto Editions of Julius Caesar’, The Library 4, 3rd series: 122–32.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Henrietta C. 1922. Mr. William Shakespeare, Original and Early Editions of his Quartos and Folios; His Source Books and Those Containing Contemporary Notices. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Henrietta C., and Pollard, Alfred W. 1916. A Census of Shakespeare’s Plays in Quarto, 1594–1709. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan 1989. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730–1830. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan, and Ramsussen, Eric, with Sewell, Jan and Sharpe, Will (eds.) 2013. William Shakespeare and Others: Collaborative Plays. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bate, W. J., Bullitt, J. M., and Powell, L. F. (eds.) 1963. The Idler and Adventurer. The Yale Edition of the Works of Samuel Johnson. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Baugh, Christopher 2003. ‘“Our Divine Shakespeare Fitly Illustrated”: Staging Shakespeare 1660-1900’, in Martineau, Jane (ed.), Shakespeare in Art. New York: Merrell, pp. 29–40.Google Scholar
Beal, Peter 2005–13a. ‘George Herbert’, Catalogue of English Literary Manuscripts. www.celm-ms.org.uk/introductions/HerbertGeorge.html. Accessed 12 May 2017.Google Scholar
Beal, Peter 2005–13b. ‘John Milton’, Catalogue of English Literary Manuscripts. www.celm-ms.org.uk/introductions/MiltonJohn.html. Accessed 12 May 2017.Google Scholar
Beal, Peter (ed.) 2005–13c. ‘John Milton (1607–1674)’, Catalogue of English Literary Manuscripts. www.celm-ms.org.uk/authors/miltonjohn.html. Accessed 12 May 2017.Google Scholar
Belanger, Terry 1975. ‘Tonson, Wellington and the Shakespeare Copyrights’, in Hunt, Richard William, Philip, Ian Gilbert and Roberts, Richard Julian (eds.), Studies in the Book Trade in Honor of Graham Pollard. Oxford: The Oxford Bibliographical Society, pp. 195–210.Google Scholar
Belsey, Catherine 2001. ‘Tarquin Dispossessed: Expropriation and Consent in The Rape of Lucrece’, Shakespeare Quarterly 52: 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Gerald Eades 1943. ‘John Cotgrave’s English Treasury of Wit and Language and the Elizabethan Drama’, Studies in Philology 40: 186–203.Google Scholar
Berger, Thomas L. 1988. ‘The Second Quarto of Othello and the Question of Textual Authority’, Analytic and Enumerative Bibliography 2: 141–59.Google Scholar
Bevington, David 2005. ‘“Above the element they lived in”: The Visual Language of Antony and Cleopatra, Acts 4 and 5’, in Deats, Sara Munson (ed.), Antony and Cleopatra: New Critical Essays. New York: Routledge, pp. 95–110.Google Scholar
Birrell, T. A. 2001. ‘Books and Buyers in Seventeenth-Century English Auction Sales’, in Myers, Robin, Harris, Michael and Mandelbrote, Giles (eds.), Under the Hammer: Book Auctions Since the Seventeenth Century. London: British Library, pp. 51–64.Google Scholar
Blayney, Peter W. M. 1997. ‘The Publication of Playbooks’, in Cox, John D. and Kastan, David Scott (eds.), A New History of Early English Drama. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 383–422.Google Scholar
Boileau-Despreaux, Nicolas 1683. The Art of Poetry. Solmes, William and Dryden, John (trans.). London.Google Scholar
Bourne, Claire M. L. 2014. ‘“High Designe”: Beaumont and Fletcher Illustrated’, English Literary Renaissance 44.2: 275–327.Google Scholar
Bourne, Claire M. L. 2015. ‘“Beloveed Plays”: A Sammelband of 1680s Quartos and Its Readers’, The Collation: A Gathering of Scholarship from the Folger Shakespeare Library. http://collation.folger.edu/2015/09/beloveed-plays// Accessed 15 May 2017.Google Scholar
Bourus, Terri, and Taylor, Gary (eds.) 2013. The Creation and Re-Creation of Cardenio: Performing Shakespeare, Transforming Cervantes. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, Fredson 1951. ‘Robert Roberts: A Printer of Shakespeare’s Fourth Folio’, Shakespeare Quarterly 2: 241–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Brian 1997. ‘The Blackamoor Babe: Titus Andronicus, Play, Ballad, and History’, Notes and Queries 242: 492–4.Google Scholar
Braunmuller, A. R. 2003. ‘Shakespeare’s Various’, in Thompson, Ann and McMullan, Gordon (eds.), In Arden: Essays in Honour of Richard Proudfoot. London: Thomson Learning, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Bristol, Michael D., and Marotti, Arthur D. 2000. Print, Manuscript, & Performance: The Changing Relations of the Media in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brook, Nicholas (ed.) 1990. The Oxford Shakespeare: The Tragedy of Macbeth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Douglas A. 2006. From Playhouse to Printing House: Drama and Authorship in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brylowe, Thora n.d. The Sister Arts as Cultural Practice, 1760–1820. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Burrow, Colin 1998. ‘Life and Work in Shakespeare’s Poems’, Proceedings of the British Academy 97: 15–50.Google Scholar
Burrow, Colin (ed.) 2002. The Oxford Shakespeare: Complete Sonnets and Poems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caines, Michael 2013. Shakespeare and the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Tanya 2004. ‘Meanings of All for Love, 1677-1813’, Comparative Drama 38: 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calè, Luise 2006. Fuseli’s Milton Gallery: ‘Turning Readers into Spectators’. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Gordon, and Corns, Thomas N. 2008. John Milton: Life, Work, and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell Boswell, Jackson 2006. ‘Two “New” Seventeenth-Century Portraits of Shakespeare’, Shakespeare Quarterly 57.3: 309–17.Google Scholar
Capell, Edward (ed.) 1779. Notes and Various Readings to Shakespeare, Part the First. 3 vols. London.Google Scholar
Carnegie, David, and Taylor, Gary (eds.) 2012. The Quest for Cardenio: Shakespeare, Fletcher, Cervantes, and the Lost Play. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, Amy 1977. The Williams Manuscript of George Herbert’s Poems. Delmar: Scholars’ Facsimiles.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger 2009. The Author’s Hand: Literary Archives, Criticism and Edition. Manchester: Institute for Transnational Studies in Languages, Linguistics and Cultures.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger 2014. ‘The Time of the Work’, in The Author’s Hand and the Printer’s Mind. Cochrane, Lydia G. (trans.). Cambridge MA: Polity Press, pp. 172–80.Google Scholar
Cheney, Patrick 2004. Shakespeare, National Poet-Playwright. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheney, Patrick 2008. Shakespeare’s Literary Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clapp, Sarah L. C. 1931–2. ‘The Beginnings of Subscription Publication in the Seventeenth Century’, Modern Philology 29: 365–79.Google Scholar
Clapp, Sarah L. C. 1932. ‘Subscription Publishers Prior to Jacob Tonson’, Library 13: 158–63.Google Scholar
Clare, Janet 2002. Drama of the English Republic 1649–1660. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Cloud, Random 1991. ‘“The very names of the Persons”: Editing and the Invention of Dramatick Character’, in Kastan, David Scott and Stallybrass, Peter (eds.), Staging the Renaissance: Reinterpretations of Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama. New York: Routledge, pp. 88–96.Google Scholar
Connor, Francis X. 2014. Literary Folios and Ideas of the Book in Early Modern England. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtilz de Sandras, Gatien 1685/6. The History of the Life and Actions of… the Viscount de Turenne. London.Google Scholar
Cowan, Brian 2004. ‘An Open Elite: The Peculiarities of Connoisseurship in Early Modern England’, Modern Intellectual History 1.2: 151–83.Google Scholar
Cowler, Rosemary (ed.) 1986. The Prose Works of Alexander Pope, Volume II: The Major Works, 1725–1744. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Creaser, John 2012. ‘The 1631 Folio (F2(2)): Textual Essay’, in Bevington, David, Butler, Martin and Donaldson, Ian (eds.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson Online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Accessed 26 May 2017.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Vanessa 2008. Shakespeare and Garrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, Giles E. 1946. ‘The Copyright of Shakespeare’s Dramatic Works’, in Prouty, Charles T. (ed.), Studies in Honor of A.H.R. Fairchild. Columbia: University of Missouri, pp. 9–35.Google Scholar
Dawson, Giles E. 1951/2. ‘Some Bibliographical Irregularities in the Shakespeare Fourth Folio’, Studies in Bibliography 4: 93–103.Google Scholar
Deats, Sara Munson 2005. ‘Shakespeare’s Anamorphic Drama: A Survey of Antony and Cleopatra in Criticism, on Stage, and on Screen’, in Deats, Sara Munson (ed.), Antony and Cleopatra: New Critical Essays. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–94.Google Scholar
De Grazia, Margreta 1991a. Shakespeare Verbatim: The Reproduction of Authenticity and the 1790 Apparatus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Grazia, Margreta 1991b. ‘Shakespeare in Quotation Marks’, in Marsden, Jean I. (ed.), The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Works and the Myth. New York: St Martyn’s, pp. 57–71.Google Scholar
De Grazia, Margreta 1999. ‘The Scandal of Shakespeare’s Sonnets’ in Stephen Orgel and Sean Keilen (eds.), Shakespeare: The Critical Complex: Shakespeare’s Poems. 10 vols. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
De Grazia, Margreta, and Stallybrass, Peter 1993. ‘The Materiality of the Shakespearean Text’, Shakespeare Quarterly 44.3: 255–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depledge, Emma Lesley 2012. ‘Playbills, Prologues, and Playbooks: Selling Shakespeare Adaptations, 1678-82’, Philological Quarterly 91: 305–30.Google Scholar
Depledge, Emma Lesley n.d. ‘False Dating: The Case of the 1676 Hamlet Quartos’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Dias, Rosemarie 2003. ‘John Boydell’s Shakespeare Gallery and the Promotion of a National Aesthetic’. PhD thesis, University of York.Google Scholar
Di Cesare, Mario A. (ed.) 1995. George Herbert, The Temple: A Diplomatic Edition of the Bodleian Manuscript (Tanner 307). Bighamton: MRTS.Google Scholar
Diekhoff, John S. 1968. ‘The Text of Comus, 1634 to 1645’, in Diekhoff, John S. (ed.), A Maske at Ludlow: Essays on Milton’s Comus. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University Press, pp. 251–75.Google Scholar
Dixon, Peter (ed.) 1996. The Country Wife and Other Plays. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dobson, Michael 1992. The Making of the National Poet: Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Authorship, 1660–1769. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dover Wilson, J. 1963. Shakespeare’s Sonnets: An Introduction for Historians and Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dryden, John 1701. The Comedies, Tragedies, and Operas written by John Dryden, Esq. London.Google Scholar
Dugas, Don-John 2006. Marketing the Bard: Shakespeare in Performance and Print 1660–1740. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Katherine (ed.) 2001. ‘Ravished and Revised: The 1616 Lucrece’, Review of English Studies 52: 516–23.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Katherine, and Woudhuysen, H. R. (eds.) 2007. Shakespeare’s Poems. London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry 1984. The Function of Criticism: From ‘The Spectator’ to Poststructuralism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Paul, and Wells, Stanley 2004. Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erne, Lukas 2003. Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erne, Lukas 2013. Shakespeare and the Book Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erne, Lukas 2016. ‘Newly Discovered Adaptations of Poems by John Donne, Printed in 1662’, Review of English Studies 67: 679–712.Google Scholar
Erne, Lukas, and Badcoe, Tamsin 2014. ‘Shakespeare and the Popularity of Poetry Books in Print, 1583-1622’, Review of English Studies 65: 33–57.Google Scholar
Estill, Laura, 2014. ‘Commonplace Markers and Quotation Marks’, Archbook: Architectures of the Book, University of Saskatchewan Humanities and Fine Arts Digital Research Centre. http://drc.usask.ca/projects/archbook/commonplace.php. Accessed 26 May 2017.Google Scholar
Estill, Laura, 2015. Dramatic Extracts in Seventeenth-Century English Manuscripts: Watching, Reading, Changing Plays. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore 1943. ‘Milton and the Hobson Poems’, Modern Language Quarterly 4: 281–90.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore et al. (eds.) 1997. The Riverside Shakespeare, 2nd edn. Boston: Houghton.Google Scholar
Eyre, G. E. Briscoe, and Rivington, C. R. 1913–14. A Transcript of the Registers of the Worshipful Company of Stationers from 1640–1708 A.D. 3 vols. London: Privately Printed.Google Scholar
Farmer, Alan B., and Lesser, Zachary 2005. ‘The Popularity of Playbooks Revisited’, Shakespeare Quarterly 56: 1–32.Google Scholar
Ferguson, W. Craig 1989. The Loan Book of the Stationers’ Company with a List of Transactions 1592–1692. London: Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
Finkelpearl, P. J. 2004. ‘Bastard, Thomas (1565/6–1618)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Bibliography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fontenelle, M. 1685. Dialogues of the Dead, Ancient and Modern. The Second Part. London.Google Scholar
Ford, H. L. 1935. Shakespeare 1700–1740: A Collation of the Editions and Separate Plays with Some Account of T. Johnson and R. Walker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fougasses, Thomas 1612. The Generall Historie of the Magnificent State of Venice. London.Google Scholar
Friedman, Arthur (ed.) 1979. The Plays of William Wycherley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Furness, H. H. (ed.) 1908. The Variorum Shakespeare: King Lear. 1880. Philadelphia: J B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Gavin, Michael 2012. ‘Writing Print Cultures Past: Literary Criticism and Book History’, Book History 15: 26–47.Google Scholar
Gibson-Wood, Carol 2000. Jonathan Richardson: Art Theorist of the English Enlightenment. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson-Wood, Carol 2003. ‘“A Judiciously Disposed Collection”: Jonathan Richardson Senior’s Cabinet of Drawings’, in Baker, Christopher, Elam, Caroline and Warwick, Genevieve (eds.), Collecting Prints and Drawings in Europe, c. 1500–1750. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 155–72.Google Scholar
Gildon, Charles 1698. The Lives and Characters of the English Dramatick Poets. London.Google Scholar
Gondris, Joanna 1998. ‘“All This Farrago”: The Eighteenth-Century Shakespeare Variorum Page as a Critical Structure’, in Gondris, Joanna (ed.), Reading Readings: Essays on Shakespeare Editing in the Eighteenth Century. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, pp. 123–39.Google Scholar
Graham-White, Antony 1995. Punctuation and Its Dramatic Value in Shakespearean Drama. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen 2015. ‘General Introduction’, in Greenblatt, Stephen et al. (eds.), The Norton Shakespeare, 3rd edn. New York: Norton, pp. 1–74.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W. 1939–59. A Bibliography of English Printed Drama to the Restoration. 4 vols. London: Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
Griffin, Dustin 2010. Swift and Pope: Satirists in Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hadfield, Andrew 2005. Shakespeare and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamm, Robert B. Jr 2004. ‘Rowe’s Shakespear (1709) and the Tonson House Style’, College Literature 31.3: 179–205.Google Scholar
Hammond, Brean 1997. Professional Imaginative Writing in England, 1670–1740: ‘Hackney for Bread’. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, John 1999. ‘The Restoration Poetic and Dramatic Canon’, in Barnard, John and McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Volume IV: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 388–409.Google Scholar
Hammond, Paul 1997. ‘Friends or Lovers? Sensitivity to Homosexual Implications in Adaptations of Shakespeare, 1640-1701’, in Brown, Cedric C. and Marotti, Arthur (eds.), Texts and Cultural Change in Early Modern England. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 225–47.Google Scholar
Hao, Tianhu 1999. ‘Hesperides, or the Muses’ Garden and its Manuscript History’, The Library, 7th Series 10: 372–404.Google Scholar
Happé, Peter 2012. ‘The 1640–1 Folio (F2(3)): Textual Essay’, in Bevington, David, Butler, Martin and Donaldson, Ian (eds.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson Online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Accessed 26 May 2017.Google Scholar
Haring-Smith, Tori 1985. From Farce to Metadrama: A Stage History of The Taming of the Shrew, 1594–1983. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Harington, John 1591. ‘An Advertisement to the Reader’, in Ariosto, Lodovico, Orlando Furioso. Harington, John (trans.). London.Google Scholar
Hart, Edward L. (ed.) 1971. Minor Lives: A Collection of Biographies by John Nichols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hazen, Allen 1938. ‘Johnson’s Shakespeare: A Study in Cancellation’. Times Literary Supplement, 24 December: 820.Google Scholar
Heath, James 1663. Flagellum: or The Life and Death, Birth and Burial of Oliver Cromwell. London.Google Scholar
Hecht, Anthony 1996. ‘Introduction’, in Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.), The Sonnets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Heffernan, Megan 2013. ‘Turning Sonnets into Poems: Textual Affect and John Benson’s Metaphysical Shakespeare’, Shakespeare Quarterly 64:1: 71–98.Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard 1992. Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Helmig, Bernd, Huber, Jan-Alexander, and Leeflang, Peter S. H. 2008. ‘Co-Branding: The State of the Art’, Schmalenbach Business Review 60.4: 359–77.Google Scholar
Herford, C. H., and Percy, and Simpson, Evelyn 1925–52. Ben Jonson. 11 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hinman, Charlton 1963. The Printing and Proof-Reading of the First Folio of Shakespeare. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hirst, Derek 2003. ‘Reading the Royal Romance: Or, Intimacy in a King’s Cabinet’, The Seventeenth Century 18: 211–29.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Norma, and Blagden, Cyprian 1956. The Notebook of Some Aspects of Book Trade Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter 1979. The Ornament of Action: Text and Performance in Restoration Comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter 1999. ‘Introduction’, in Rowe, Nicholas (ed.), The Works of Mr. William Shakespear, 1709, 7 vols. Reprint. London: Pickering & Chatto, pp. vii–xxx.Google Scholar
Hooks, Adam 2008. ‘Booksellers’ Catalogues and the Classification of Printed Drama in Seventeenth-Century England’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 102: 445–64.Google Scholar
Hooks, Adam 2011. ‘Necessary Quotation Marks’, Anchora. www.adamghooks.net/2011/06/necessary-quotation-marks.html. Accessed 15 May 2017.Google Scholar
Howard-Hill, T. H. 1990. ‘The Evolution of the Form of Plays in English During the Renaissance’, Renaissance Quarterly 43–1: 112–45.Google Scholar
Huckin, Henry R. (ed.) 1871. Milton: Comus, Lycidas, L’Allegro, Il Penseroso, and Selected Sonnets. London: Shelley, Jackson, and Halliday.Google Scholar
Hume, Robert D. 1997. ‘Before the Bard: “Shakespeare” in Early Eighteenth-Century London’, ELH 64: 41–75.Google Scholar
Hume, Robert D. 2006. ‘The Economics of Culture in London, 1660–1740’, Huntington Library Quarterly 69:4: 487–533.Google Scholar
Ingleby, C. M., Smith, L. Toulmin, and Furness, F. J. (eds.) 1970. The Shakspere Allusion-Book: A Collection of Allusions to Shakspere from 1591 to 1700. 1909. Revised ed. by Munro, John. Preface by Edmund Chambers. 2 vols. New York: Books for Libraries Press.Google Scholar
Jarvis, Simon 1995. Scholars and Gentlemen: Shakespearian Textual Criticism and Representations of Scholarly Labour, 1725–1765. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, R. F. 1919. Lewis Theobald: His Contributions to English Scholarship, with some Unpublished Letters. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben 1692. The works of Ben Jonson which were Formerly Printed in Two Volumes. London.Google Scholar
Kahan, Jeffrey 1998. Reforging Shakespeare: The Story of a Theatrical Scandal. Bethlehem: Lehigh University Press.Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott 2001. Shakespeare and the Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott 2003. ‘Performances and Playbooks: the closing of the theatres and the politics of drama’, in Sharpe, Kevin and Zwicker, Steven N. (eds.), Reading, Society and Politics in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–84.Google Scholar
Kewes, Paulina 1995. ‘“Give me the sociable Pocket-books”: Humphrey Moseley’s Serial Publication of Octavo Play Collections’, Publishing History 38: 5–21.Google Scholar
King, Edmund G. C. 2010. ‘Fragmenting Authorship in the Eighteenth-Century Shakespeare Edition’, Shakespeare 6.1: 1–19.Google Scholar
King, Edmund G. C. 2012. ‘Cardenio and the Eighteenth-Century Shakespeare Canon’, in Carnegie, David and Taylor, Gary (eds.), The Quest for Cardenio: Shakespeare, Fletcher, Cervantes, and the Lost Play. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 81–94.Google Scholar
Kirkman, Francis (ed.) 1662. The Wits, or, Sport upon Sport. In Select Pieces of Drollery, Digested into Scenes by Way of Dialogue. London.Google Scholar
Kirwan, Peter 2012. ‘The Shakespeare Apocrypha and Canonical Expansion in the Marketplace’, Philological Quarterly 91.2: 247–75.Google Scholar
Kirwan, Peter 2015. Shakespeare and the Idea of Apocrypha: Negotiating the Boundaries of the Dramatic Canon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Jeffrey Todd 2013. Bound to Read: Compilations, Collections, and the Making of Renaissance Literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Krueger, Misty 2011. ‘Revenge in Early Restoration England and Sir William Davenant’s Hamlet’. New Perspectives on the Eighteenth Century 8: 38–57.Google Scholar
Lamb, Jonathan P. 2010. ‘Parentheses and Privacy in Philip Sidney’s Arcadia’, Studies in Philology 107.3: 310–35.Google Scholar
Lamb, Margaret 1980. Antony and Cleopatra on the English Stage. London: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
Lawler, John 1898. Book Auctions in England in the Seventeenth Century (1676–1700). London: E. Stock.Google Scholar
Lennard, John 1991. But I Digress: The Exploitation of Parentheses in English Printed Verse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth 2014. ‘Hamlet’s Poem to Ophelia and the Theater of the Letter’, English Literary History 81.3: 841–63.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary 2004. Renaissance Drama and the Politics of Publication: Readings in the English Book Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary 2006a. ‘Typographic Nostalgia: Playreading, Popularity, and the Meaning of Blackletter’, in Straznicky, Marta (ed.), The Book of the Play: Playwrights, Stationers, and Readers in Early Modern England. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 99–126.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary 2006b. ‘Copyright’, in Kastan, David Scott (ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of British Literature. 5 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, vol. 1. pp. 68–73.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary, and Stallybrass, Peter 2008. ‘The First Literary Hamlet and the Commonplacing of Professional Plays’, Shakespeare Quarterly 59.4: 371–420.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara Kiefer, and Haan, Estelle (eds.) 2012. The Complete Works of John Milton: Volume III: The Shorter Poems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. S., and Wallace, A. Dayle (eds.) 1937. The Yale Edition of Horace Walpole’s Correspondence, vol. 2. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lockwood, Tom 2012, ‘The Works of Ben Jonson (1692): Textual Essay’, in Bevington, David, Butler, Martin and Donaldson, Ian (eds.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson Online Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Accessed 26 May 2017.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, Joseph 2002. Ben Jonson and Possessive Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, Thomas 1906. The First Editors of Shakespeare: Pope and Theobald. London: D. Nutt.Google Scholar
Maddison, R. E. 1966. ‘The King’s Cabinet Opened: A Case Study in Pamphlet History’, Notes and Queries 13: 2–9.Google Scholar
Maguire, Laurie 2016. ‘Typographical Embodiment: The Case of Etcetera’, in Huetwell, Frederick G. L. and Traub, Valerie (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare and Embodiment: Gender, Sexuality, and Race. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 527–48Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, Giles 1997. ‘Richard Bentley’s Copies: The Ownership of Copyrights in the late 17th Century’, in Hunt, Arnold, Mandelbrote, Giles and Shell, Alison (eds.), The Book Trade & Its Customers, 1450–1900: Historical Essays for Robin Myers. New Castle: Oak Knoll, pp. 55–94.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, Giles 2001. ‘The Organisation of Book Auctions in Late Seventeenth-Century London’, in Myers, Robin, Harris, Michael and Mandelbrote, Giles (eds.), Under the Hammer: Book Auctions Since the Seventeenth Century. New Castle: Oak Knoll Press, pp. 15–50.Google Scholar
Marcham, Frank 1930. ‘Thomas Walkley and the Ben Jonson “Works” of 1640’, The Library xi, 4th series: 225–9.Google Scholar
Marcus, Leah S. 1996. Unediting the Renaissance: Shakespeare, Marlowe, Milton. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marino, James J. 2011. Owning William Shakespeare: The King’s Men and Their Intellectual Property. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Marotti, Arthur F. 1993. ‘Manuscript, Print, and the Social History of the Lyric’, in Corns, Thomas N. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to English Poetry: Donne to Marvell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52–79.Google Scholar
Marsden, Jean I. 1995. The Re-Imagined Text: Shakespeare, Adaptation and Eighteenth-Century Literary Theory. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Marshall, David 2005. The Frame of Art: Fictions of Aesthetic Experience, 1750–1815. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Massai, Sonia 2002. ‘“Taking Just Care of the Impression”: Editorial Intervention in Shakespeare’s Fourth Folio, 1685’, Shakespeare Survey 55: 257–70.Google Scholar
Massai, Sonia 2007. Shakespeare and the Rise of the Editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Massinger, Philip, Middleton, Thomas and Rowley, William 1656. The Old Law: Or, A New Way to Please You. London.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F. 1961. Stationers’ Company Apprentices 1605–1640. Charlottesville: Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F. 2002. ‘Typography and Meaning: The Case of William Congreve’, in McDonald, Peter D. and Suarez, Michael F. (eds.), Making Meaning: ‘Printers of the Mind’ and Other Essays. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 198–236.Google Scholar
McKerrow, Ronald B. 1933. The Treatment of Shakespeare’s Text by his Earlier Editors, 1709–1768. London: Humphrey Milford Amen House.Google Scholar
McKerrow, Ronald B. 1934. ‘Rowe’s Shakespeare, 1709’, Times Literary Supplement, March 8: 168.Google Scholar
Merchant, W. Moelwyn 1959. Shakespeare and the Artist. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milhous, Judith and Hume, Robert D. 2015. The Publication of Plays in London 1660–1800: Playwrights, Publishers and the Market. London: British Library.Google Scholar
Miller, C. W. 1948. ‘Henry Herringman, Restoration Bookseller-Publisher’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 42: 292–306.Google Scholar
Miller, Stephen Roy (ed.) 1998. The Taming of a Shrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mowat, Barbara 1994. ‘Nicholas Rowe and the Twentieth-Century Shakespeare Text’, in Kishi, Tetsuo, Pringle, Roger and Wells, Stanley (eds.), Shakespeare and Cultural Traditions. Newark: University of Delaware Press, pp. 314–22.Google Scholar
Murphy, Andrew 2003. Shakespeare in Print: A History and Chronology of Shakespeare Publishing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nevitt, Marcus 2010. ‘Shakespeare for Royalists: John Quarles and The Rape of Lucrece (1655)’, in McElligott, Jason and Smith, David L. (eds.), Royalists and Royalism During the Interregnum. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 171–93.Google Scholar
Nichols, John 1817–58. Illustrations of the Literary History of the Eighteenth Century. 8 vols. London: John Nichols.Google Scholar
Nichols, John, and Steevens, George (eds.) 1781. Biographical Anecdotes of William Hogarth. And a Catalogue of His Works Chronologically Arranged. London.Google Scholar
Nichols, John, and Steevens, George (eds.) 1782. Biographical Anecdotes of William Hogarth; with a Catalogue of His Works, 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar
Nichols, John, and Steevens, George (eds.) 1808–17. The Genuine Works of William Hogarth. 3 vols. London: J. Nichols.Google Scholar
Orgel, Stephen 2006. ‘The Book of the Play’, in Orgel, Stephen and Holland, Peter (eds.), From Performance to Print in Shakespeare’s England. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 13–54.Google Scholar
Parker, W. R. 1936. ‘Milton’s Hobson Poems: Some Neglected Early Texts’, Modern Language Review 31: 395–402Google Scholar
Parker, W. R. 1940. Milton’s Contemporary Reputation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel 1993. Reading Between the Lines. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Paul, Henry N. 1934. ‘Player’s Quartos and Duodecimos of Hamlet’, Modern Language Notes 49: 369–75.Google Scholar
Paul, J. Gavin 2014. Shakespeare and the Imprints of Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pepys, Samuel 1995. The Diary of Samuel Pepys, 1667. Latham, Robert and Matthews, William (eds.). London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Peters, Julie Stone 2000. Theatre of the Book 1480–1880: Print, Text, and Performance in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, Rudolf 1976. History of Classical Scholarship from 1300 to 1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pitcher, John 2000. ‘Divulging and Publishing Samuel Daniel’, in Murphy, Andrew (ed.), The Renaissance Text. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 8–29.Google Scholar
Pooley, Julian 2013. ‘“An Irresistible Impulse to Proceed”: The Problem of Authorship in the Works of John Nichols’. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Conference on Book Trade History, Stationers’ Hall, London, 24–5 November.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander (ed.) 1729. The Posthumous Works of William Wycherley, Esq, vol. II. London.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander, and Swift, Jonathan (eds.) 1727. Miscellanies in Prose and Verse. 2 vols. London.Google Scholar
Potter, Lois 1989. Secret Rites and Secret Writing: Royalist Literature, 1641-1660. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Proot, Goran 2014. ‘Converging Design Paradigms: Long-Term Evolutions in the Layout of Title Pages of Latin and Vernacular Editions Published in the Southern Netherlands, 1541–1660’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 108.3: 269–306.Google Scholar
Prynne, William 1643. The Fourth Part of the Soveraigne Power of Parliaments and Kingdomes. London.Google Scholar
Raffel, Burton (ed.) 1999. The Annotated Milton: Complete English Poems. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Randell, Dale 1995. Winter Fruit: English Drama, 1642–1660. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Eric 1998. ‘Anonymity and the Erasure of Shakespeare’s First Eighteenth-Century Editor’, in Gondris, Joanna (ed.), Reading Readings: Essays on Shakespeare Editing in the Eighteenth Century. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, pp. 318–23.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Eric 2012. ‘Cynthia’s Revels: Textual Essay’, in Bevington, David, Butler, Martin and Donaldson, Ian (eds.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson Online. Accessed 26 May 2017.Google Scholar
Raven, James 2007. The Business of Books: Booksellers and the English Book Trade 1450–1850. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Revard, Stella P. (ed.) 2009. John Milton: Complete Shorter Poems. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ringler, William A. 1987. ‘The 1640 and 1653 Poems: By Francis Beaumont, Gent. and the Canon of Beaumont’s Nondramatic Verse’, Studies in Bibliography 40: 120–40.Google Scholar
Ritchie, Fiona, and Sabor, Peter (eds.) 2012. Shakespeare in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Caroline 1998. ‘Lewis Theobald and Theories of Editing’, in Gondris, Joanna (ed.), Reading Readings: Essays on Shakespeare Editing in the Eighteenth Century. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, pp. 188–205.Google Scholar
Roberts, Sasha 2003. Reading Shakespeare’s Poems in Early Modern England. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rogers, Shef 2001. ‘Uncovering Wycherley’s Miscellaneous Remains’, BSANZ Bulletin 25.1–2: 145–56.Google Scholar
Rollins, Hyder Edward 1927. ‘Samuel Sheppard and His Praise of Poets’, Studies in Philology 24.4: 509–55.Google Scholar
Rollins, Hyder Edward (ed.) 1938. A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare: The Poems. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Rollins, Hyder Edward (ed.) 1944. A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare: The Sonnets 2 vols. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Ross, Trevor 2013. ‘The Fate of Style in an Age of Intellectual Property’, ELH 80.3: 747–82.Google Scholar
Rudy, Seth 2011. ‘Pope, Swift, and the Poetics of Posterity’, Eighteenth-Century Life 35.3: 1–28.Google Scholar
Seary, Peter 1990. Lewis Theobald and the Editing of Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Seward, Thomas, and Theobald, Lewis (eds.) 1750. The Works of Mr. Francis Beaumont and Mr. John Fletcher. 6 vols. London.Google Scholar
Shawcross, John T. 1967. ‘A Note on Milton’s Hobson Poems’, Review of English Studies 18: 433–7.Google Scholar
Shawcross, John T. 1970. John Milton: The Critical Heritage. 2 vols. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shawcross, John T. 1984. Milton: A Bibliography for the Years 1624–1700. Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies 30. Binghamton: Centre for Medieval & Early Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
Shawcross, John T. 2012. Milton: A Bibliography for the Years 1624–1700: Addenda and Corrigenda. Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies 30A. Binghamton: Centre for Medieval & Early Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
Sherbo, Arthur 1956. Samuel Johnson, Editor of Shakespeare. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sherbo, Arthur (ed.) 1968. Johnson on Shakespeare. 2 vols. The Yale Edition of the Works of Samuel Johnson. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sherburn, George (ed.) 1956. The Correspondence of Alexander Pope. 6 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Shrank, Cathy 2009. ‘Reading Shakespeare’s Sonnets: John Benson and the 1640 Poems’, Shakespeare 5.3: 271–91.Google Scholar
Sillars, Stuart 2008. The Illustrated Shakespeare, 1709–1875. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smentek, Kristel 2014. Mariette and the Science of the Connoisseur in Eighteenth-Century Europe. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Smith, Hallett 1950. ‘“No Cloudy Stuffe to Puzzell Intellect”: A Testimonial Misapplied to Shakespeare’, Shakespeare Quarterly 1.1: 18–21.Google Scholar
Smyth, Adam 2004. ‘Profit and Delight’: Printed Miscellanies in England, 1640–1682. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Hazelton 1925. ‘Restoration Play Lists’, Review of English Studies 1.4: 443–6.Google Scholar
Spencer, Hazelton 1927. Shakespeare Improved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Spenser, Edmund 1591. Complaints Containing Sundrie Small Poemes of the Worlds Vanitie. London.Google Scholar
Spevack, Martin (ed.) 1990. A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare: Antony and Cleopatra. New York: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Stallybrass, Peter 1993. ‘Editing as Cultural Formation: The Sexing of Shakespeare’s Sonnets’, Modern Language Quarterly 54.3: 91–103.Google Scholar
St Clair, William 2004. The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Tiffany 2009. Documents of Performance in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Tiffany 2011. ‘“The Forgery of some Modern Author”?: Theobald’s Shakespeare and Cardenio’s Double Falsehood’, Shakespeare Quarterly 62.4: 555–93.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Allan 1948. ‘New Uses of Watermarks as Bibliographical Evidence’, Papers of the Bibliographic Society 1: 149–82.Google Scholar
Straznicky, Marta 2013. ‘Introduction: What is a Stationer?’, in Straznicky, Marta (ed.), The Book of the Play: Playwrights, Stationers, and Readers in Early Modern England. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Stringer, Gary A. (ed.) 2000. Variorum Edition of the Poetry of John Donne. 8 vols. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Swedenberg, H. T. Jr (ed.) 1972. The Works of John Dryden: Poems 1681-1684. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Syme, Holger Schott 2008. ‘Un-editing the Margin: Jonson, Marston, and the Theatrical Page’, English Literary Renaissance 38.1: 142–71.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary 1987. ‘The Canon and Chronology of Shakespeare’s Plays’ in Stanley Wells and Gary Taylor, with John Jowett and William Montgomery, William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 69–144.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary 1989. Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History from the Restoration to the Present. New York: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary 2007. ‘Textual Introduction to Hengist, King of Kent’, in Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John (eds.), Thomas Middleton and Early Modern Textual Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 410–14.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sophie 2010. ‘Poetry and Illustration: “Amicable Strife”’, in Mahoney, Charles (ed.), A Companion to Romantic Poetry. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 354–73.Google Scholar
Thompson, Ann 1999. ‘“I’ll have grounds / More relative than this:” The puzzle of John Ward’s Hamlet Promptbooks’, The Yearbook of English Studies 29: 138–50.Google Scholar
Treadwell, Michael 2014. ‘The stationers and the printing acts at the end of the seventeenth century’, in Barnard, John and McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. IV: 1557–1695. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 755–76.Google Scholar
Tucker, T. G. (ed.) 1924. The Sonnets of Shakespeare: Edited from the Quarto of 1609. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tummers, Anna 2011. The Eye of the Connoisseur: Authenticating Paintings by Rembrandt and His Contemporaries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Van Lennep, William (ed.) 1965. The London Stage 1660–1800, Part 1: 1660–1700. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Vareschi, Mark 2012. ‘Attribution and Repetition: The Case of Defoe and the Circulating Library’, Eighteenth-Century Life 36.2: 36–59.Google Scholar
Velz, John W. 1969. ‘“Pirate Hills” and the Quartos of Julius Caesar’, PBSA 63: 177–93.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian 2002. ‘Counterfeiting’ Shakespeare: Evidence, Authorship, and John Ford’s Funerall Elegye. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Voiture, Vincent 1676. Zelinda: An Excellent New Romance. D’Urfey, Thomas (trans.). London.Google Scholar
W. S. 1612. A Funeral Elegye in Memory of the Late Virtuous Maister William Peter. London.Google Scholar
Walford, Benjamin 1688. A Catalogue of Latin, French, and English Books to be Sold in Numbers. London.Google Scholar
Wall, Cynthia 1998. The Literary and Cultural Spaces of Restoration London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walls, Peter 1996. Music in the English Courtly Masque 1604–1640. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, Marcus 1997. Shakespeare, Milton and Eighteenth-Century Literary Editing: The Beginnings of Interpretative Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warwick, Genevieve 2000. The Arts of Collecting: Padre Sebastiano Resta and the Market for Drawings in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weinbrot, Howard D. 2005. Menippean Satire Reconsidered: From Antiquity to the Eighteenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
West, Anthony James 2000. The Shakespeare First Folio: The History of the Book: Volume 1. An Account of the First Folio Based on Its Sales and Prices, 1623–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White-Johnston, Shirley 1984. ‘From Preface to Practice: Samuel Johnson’s Editorship of Shakespeare’, in Korshin, Paul J. and Allen, Robert R. (eds.), Greene Centennial Studies: Essays Presented to Donald Greene in the Centennial Year of the University of Southern California. Charlottesville: Virginia University Press, pp. 250–70.Google Scholar
Williams, William P. 1977. ‘Chetwin, Crooke, and the Jonson Folios’, Studies in Bibliography 30: 75–95.Google Scholar
Winn, James Anderson 1987. John Dryden and His World. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Susan 1998. Drama and Politics in the English Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, A. S. P., and Bush, Douglas 1972. A Variorum Commentary on the Poems of John Milton, Volume Two: The Minor English Poems: Part One. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Worthen, William B. 2003. Shakespeare and the Force of Modern Performance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Worthen, William B. 2005. Print and the Poetics of Modern Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wykes, David. 1985. ‘The Barbinade and the She-Tragedy: On John Banks’s The Unhappy Favourite’, in Patey, Douglas Lane and Keegan, Timothy (eds.), Augustan Studies: Essays in Honour of Irvin Ehrenpreis. Newark: Delaware University Press, 79–94.Google Scholar