Ash, M. G. (1995). Gestalt Psychology in German Culture, 1890–1967: Holism and the Quest for Objectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 358, 1177–1187. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1319.Google Scholar

Bartlett, F. C. (1925). Feeling, imaging and thinking. British Journal of Psychology, 16, 16–28.Google Scholar

Bertalanffy, L. von (1968/1976). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications (rev. edn). New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar

Billard, A. & Dautenhahn, K. (1998). Grounding communication in autonomous robots: An experimental study. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 24(1–2), 71–79.Google Scholar

Billard, A. & Hayes, G. (1997). Robot's first steps, robot's first words. In Sorace, P. & Heycock, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the GALA ‘97 Conference on Language Acquisition, Edinburgh. Edinburgh: Human Communication Research Centre.Google Scholar

Byrne, R. W. & Whiten, A. (1988). Machiavellian Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carruthers, P. & Smith, P. K. (Eds.). (1996). Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33, 25–62.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. R. (1872). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals (1st edn). London: John Murray. Retrieved from http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?pageseq=1&itemID=F1142&viewtype=text.Google Scholar

Diriwächter, R. (2004). Völkerpsychologie: The synthesis that never was. Culture & Psychology, 10(1), 179–203.Google Scholar

Diriwächter, R. & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2008). Striving for the Whole: Creating Theoretical Syntheses. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Innis, R. (2016). Affective semiosis: Philosophical links to a cultural psychology. In Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, G., Sato, T. & Dazzani, V. (Eds.), Psychology as a Science of Human Being: The Yokohama Manifesto. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Jahoda, G. (1992). Crossroads between Culture and Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kanizsa, G. (1979). Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Psychology. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Kull, K. (2011). Yuri Lotman in English: Bibliography. Sign Systems Studies, 39(2/4), 343–356.Google Scholar

Lotman, I. M. (1996). La semiosfera I: Semiótica de la cultura y del texto (trans. from Russian by Desiderio Navarro). Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar

Lotman, I. M. (1998). La semiosfera II: Semiótica de la cultura y del texto de la conducta y del espacio (trans. from Russian by Desiderio Navarro). Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar

Lotman, I. M. (2000). La semiosfera III. Semiótica de las artes y de la cultura (trans. from Russian by Desiderio Navarro). Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar

Lotman, J. (2005). On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies, 33(1), 206–229 (trans. by Wilma Clark).Google Scholar

Mammen, J. (2016). Using a topological model in psychology: Developing sense and choice categories. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(2), 196–233.Google Scholar

Martin, J. & Gillespie, A. (2010). A neo-Meadian approach to human agency: Relating the social and the psychological in the ontogenesis of perspective-coordinating persons. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44, 252–272. DOI 10.1007/s12124–010–9126–7.Google Scholar

Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1992). The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Metzger, W. (2006). Laws of Seeing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Metzger, W. (2008). Gesetze der Sehens. Eschborn, Germany: Dietmar Klotz.Google Scholar

Ong, W. (1982). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1966). L'image mental chez l'enfant. Paris: Press Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Premack, D. G. & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515–526.Google Scholar

Rivière, A. & Sotillo, M. (1999). Comunicazione, suspensione e semiosi umana: Le origine edella prattica e de la comprensione interpersonale. Metis, 1, 45–72.Google Scholar

Rosa, A. (2007a). Acts of psyche: Actuations as synthesis of semiosis and action. In Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 205–237). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rosa, A. (2007b). Dramaturgical actuations and symbolic communication: Or how beliefs make up reality. In Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 293–317). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rosa, A. (2015). The reflective mind and reflexivity in psychology: Description and explanation within a psychology of experience. In Marsico, G., Ruggieri, R., & Salvatore, S. (Eds.), Reflexivity and Psychology (Yearbook of Idiographic Science, vol. 6, pp. 17–44). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Rosa, A. (2016). The self rises up from lived experiences: A micro-semiotic analysis of the unfolding of trajectories of experience when performing ethics. In Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, N., Sato, T., & Dazzani, V. (Eds.), Psychology as the Science of Human Being: The Yokohama Manifesto (pp. 105–127). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosch, E. & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.Google Scholar

Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172. DOI: 10.1037/0033–295X.110.1.145.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. & Valsiner, J. (2010). Between the general and the unique: Overcoming the nomothetic versus idiographic opposition. Theory & Psychology, 20(6), 817–833.Google Scholar

Scherer, K. R. (2004). Feelings integrate the central representation of appraisal-driven response organization in emotion. In Manstead, A. S. R., Frijda, N. & Fischer, A. (Eds.), Feelings and Emotions (pp. 136–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sonesson, G. (1994). The concept of text in cultural semiotics. Communication to the 3rd Congress of the Nordic Association for Semiotic Studies, Trodheim. Retrieved from www.academia.edu/5424645/GÖRAN_SONESSON_The_Concept_of_Text_in_Cultural_Semiotics_1_The_Concept_of_Text_in_Cultural_Semiotics.Google Scholar

Sonesson, G. (2010). Here comes the semiotic species: Reflections on the semiotic turn in the cognitive sciences. In Wagoneer, B. (ed.), Symbolic Transformation: The Mind in Movement through Culture and Society (pp. 38–58). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Steels, L. (1996). Emergent adaptive lexicons. In Maes, P. (Ed.), From Animals To Animats: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulating Adaptive Behavior (vol. 4). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Steels, L. & McIntyre, A. (1999). Spatially distributed naming games. Advances in Complex Systems, 1(4), 301–323.Google Scholar

Stjernfeldt, F. (2014). Natural Propositions: The Actuality of Peirce's Doctrine of Dicisigns. Boston: Docent Press.Google Scholar

Toomela, A. (2015). Vygotsky's theory on the Procrustes’ bed of linear thinking: Looking for structural–systemic Theseus to save the idea of “social formation of mind.” Culture & Psychology, 21: 318–339. DOI: 10.1177/1354067X15570490.Google Scholar

Toulmin, S. & Goodfield, J. (1965). The Discovery of Time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2002). Irreversibility of time and ontopotentiality of signs. Estudios de Psicologia, 23(1), 49–59.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2009). Cultural psychology today: Innovations and oversights. Culture & Psychology, 15(1), 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2012). A Guided Science: History of Psychology in the Mirror of its Making. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2014). Invitation to Cultural Psychology. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2015). The place for synthesis: Vygotsky's analysis of affective generalization. History of the Human Sciences, 28(2), 93–102.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2016). The nomothetic function of the idiographic approach: Looking from inside out. Journal of Person-Oriented Research, 2(1–2), 5–15. DOI: 10.17505/jpor:2016.02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (2007). The myth, and beyond: Ontology of psyche and epistemology of psychology. In Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 23–39). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Varela, F. J. & Shear, J. (1999). First-person methodologies: What, why, how? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(1–2), 1–14.Google Scholar

Vogt, P. (2002). The physical symbol grounding problem. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 429–457.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, (1925/1971). Psychology of Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wagoner, B. (2017). Frederic Bartlett – A Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wundt, W. M. (1874). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie. Leipzig, Germany: W. Engelman.Google Scholar

Ziemke, T. & Sharkey, N. E. (2001). A stroll through the worlds of robots and animals: Applying Jakob von Uexküll's theory of meaning to adaptive robots and artificial life. Semiotica, 134(1–4), 701–746.Google Scholar

Braudel, F. (1969). Écrits sur l'histoire. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Frijda, N. (2004). Emotions and action. In Manstead, A. S. R., Frijda, N., & Fischer, A. (Eds.), Feelings and Emotions (pp. 158–173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335–346.Google Scholar

Harris, M. (1979). Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for a Science of Culture. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar

Lotman, I. M. (1990). Cultura y explosión: lo previsible y lo imprevisible en los procesos de cambio social. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3:417–424.Google Scholar

Sun, R. (2000). Symbol grounding: A new look at an old idea. Philosophical Psychology, 13(2), 149–172.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (1998). The Guided Mind: A Sociogenetic Approach to Personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Atmanspacher, H. & Martin, J. (2004). Reflections on process and persons. In Weber, M. (Ed.), After Whitehead: Rescher on Process Metaphysics (pp. 161–172). Frankfurt: Ontos.Google Scholar

Baerveldt, C. & Verheggen, T. (2012). Enactivism. In Valsiner, J. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 165–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boesch, E. (1991). Symbolic Action Theory and Cultural Psychology. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Bucci, W. (1997). Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Science. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Bühler, K. (1934/1990). Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Feldman-Barrett, L. (2006). Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 20–46.Google Scholar

Green, C. D. (2015). Why psychology isn't unified, and probably never will be. Review of General Psychology, 19(3), 207–214.Google Scholar

Heft, H. (2013). Environment, cognition, and culture: Reconsidering the cognitive map. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 14–25.Google Scholar

Heidbreder, E. (1933). Seven Psychologies. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar

Heine, S. (2011). Cultural Psychology. San Francisco: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Henriques, G. (2011). A New Unified Theory of Psychology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Kimble, G. A. (1990). Mother Nature's bag of tricks is small. Psychological Science, 1, 36–41.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.Google Scholar

Kitayama, S. & Cohen, D. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of Cultural Psychology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.Google Scholar

Lickliter, R. & Honeycutt, H. (2013). A developmental evolutionary framework for psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17, 184–189. DOI: 10.1037/a0032932.Google Scholar

Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Mandler, G. (2011). From association to organization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 232–235. DOI: 10.1177/0963721411414656.Google Scholar

Marsh, T. & Boag, S. (2014). Unifying psychology: Shared ontology and the continuum of practical assumptions. Review of General Psychology, 18, 49–59.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, D. (Ed.). (2001). The Handbook of Culture and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maturana, M. R., & Varela, J. F. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1897/1932). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (ed. by Hartshorne, C. & Weiss, P., vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. (2012). Social life of the sign: Sensemaking in society. In Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 241–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. (2016). Cultural psychology of desire. In Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, N., Sato, T., & Dazzani, V. (Eds.), Psychology as the Science of Human Being: The Yokohama Manifesto (pp. 33–49). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. (2016). Psychology in Black and White: The Project for a Theory Driven Science. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S., Forges Davanzati, G., Potì, S., & Ruggieri, R. (2009). Mainstream economics and sensemaking. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(2), 158–177.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. & Freda, M. F. (2011). Affect unconscious and sensemaking: A psychodynamic semiotic and dialogic model. New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 119–135.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S., Gelo, O. G., Gennaro, A., Metrangolo, R., Terrone, G., Pace, V., Venuleo, C., & Venezia, A. (2015). An automated method of content analysis for psychotherapy research: A further validation. Psychotherapy Research, 25(4), 1–13.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. & Gennaro, A. (2012). The inherent dialogicality of the clinical exchange. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 6(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S., Tebaldi, C., & Potì, S. (2006/2009). The discursive dynamic of sensemaking. In Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Strout, S., & Clegg, J. (Eds.), Yearbook of Idiographic Science (vol. 1, pp. 39–72). Rome: Firera.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. & Tschacher, W. (2012). Time dependency of psychotherapeutic exchanges: The contribution of the theory of dynamic systems in analyzing process. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 253. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00253.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. & Valsiner, J. (2010). Between the general and the unique: Overcoming the nomothetic versus idiographic opposition. Theory & Psychology, 20(6), 817–833.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. & Venuleo, C. (2013). Field and dynamic nature of sensemaking: Theoretical and methodological implications. Papers on Social Representation, 22(2), 21.1–21.41.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. & Zittoun, T. (2011). Outlines of a psychoanalytically informed cultural psychology. In Salvatore, S. & Zittoun, T. (Eds.), Cultural Psychology and Psychoanalysis in Dialogue: Issues for Constructive Theoretical and Methodological Synergies (pp. 3–46). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Smedslund, J. (1988). Psycho-Logic. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Smedslund, J. (1995). Psychologic: Common sense and the pseudoempirical. In Smith, J. A., Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.), Rethinking Psychology (pp. 196–206). London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Stam, H. J. (2004). Unifying psychology: Epistemological act or disciplinary maneuver? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1259–1262. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20069.Google Scholar

Uher, J. (2014). Interpreting “personality” taxonomies: Why previous models cannot capture individual-specific experiencing, behaviour, functioning and development. Major taxonomic tasks still lay ahead. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(4), 600–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uher, J., Addessi, E., & Visalberghi, E. (2013). Contextualised behavioural measurements of personality differences obtained in behavioural tests and social observations in adult capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 427–444.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2001). Processes structure of semiotic mediaton in human development. Human Development, 44, 84–97.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in Minds and Societies: Foundations of Cultural Psychology. New Delhi: SAGE.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2009). Integrating psychology within the globalizing world: A requiem to the post-modernist experiment with Wissenschaft. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(1), 1–21.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (Ed.). (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Varela, F., Thompson, F., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. & Valsiner, J. (2011). Idiographic science as a non-existing object: The importance of the reality of the dynamic system. In Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Gennaro, A., & Simon, J. B. Traves (Eds.), Yearbook of Idiographic Science (vol. 3, pp. 7–26). Rome: Firera.Google Scholar

Asch, S. E. (1987). Social Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, M. W. (2015). On (social) representations and the iconoclastic impetus. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 43–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, M. W. & Gaskell, G. (2008). Social representations theory: A progressive research programme for social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 335–353.Google Scholar

Coelho, N. E. & Figueiredo, L. C. (2003). Patterns of intersubjectivity in the constitution of subjectivity: Dimensions of otherness. Culture and Psychology, 9, 193–208.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2013). Things that help make us what we are. In Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.), Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity (pp. 66–76). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Daanen, P. & Sammut, G. (2012). G. H. Mead and knowing how to act: Practical meaning, routine interaction and the theory of interobjectivity. Theory and Psychology, 22(5), 556–571.Google Scholar

Harré, R. & Sammut, G. (2013). What lies between? In Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.), Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity (pp. 15–30). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. Hove, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jovchelovitch, S. & Priego-Hernández, J. (2015). Cognitive polyphasia, knowledge encounters and public spheres. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 163–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kärrholm, M. (2014). Interobjectivity in architectural research and theory: Towards a meta-theory of materiality and the effects of architecture and everyday life. The Journal of Architecture, 19(1), 64–80.Google Scholar

Kolakowski, L. (1972). Positivist Philosophy: From Hume to the Vienna Circle. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1996). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3(4), 228–245.Google Scholar

Marsico, G., Cabell, K. R., Valsiner, J., & Kharlamov, N. A. (2013). Interobjectivity as a border: The fluid dynamics of “betweenness.” In Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.), Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity (pp. 51–65). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Moghaddam, F. M. (2003). Interobjectivity and culture. Culture & Psychology, 9(3), 221–232.Google Scholar

Moghaddam, F. M. (2010). Intersubjectivity, interobjectivity and the embryonic fallacy in developmental science. Culture & Psychology, 16(4), 465–475.Google Scholar

Ross, L. & Ward, A. (1996). Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In Brown, T., Reed, E. S., & Turiel, E. (Eds.),Values and Knowledge (pp. 103–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Sammut, G. (2015). Attitudes, social representations and points of view. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 96–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sammut, G. & Bauer, M. (2011). Social influence: Modes and modalities. In Hook, D., Franks, B., & Bauer, M. (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Communication (pp. 87–106). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sammut, G., Bezzina, F., & Sartawi, M. (2015). The spiral of conflict: Naïve realism and the black sheep effect in attributions of knowledge and ignorance. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(2), 289–294.Google Scholar

Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.). (2013). Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Sartawi, M. (2010). Interobjectivity: Representations and artefacts in Cultural Psychology. Culture & Psychology, 16(4), 451–463.Google Scholar

Sammut, G. & Howarth, C. (2014). Social representations. In Teo, T. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 1799–1802). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Sammut, G. & Moghaddam, F. (2014). Interobjectivity. In Teo, T. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 991–993). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Sammut, G. & Sartawi, M. (2012). Perspective-taking and the attribution of ignorance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 42(2), 181–200.Google Scholar

Sandel, M. J. (2012). What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Wagner, W. (2015). Representation in action. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 12–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wagner, W., Sen, R., Permanadeli, R., & Howarth, C. (2012). The veil and Muslim women's identity: Cultural pressures and resistance to stereotyping. Culture & Psychology, 18(4), 79–99.Google Scholar

Bentley, A. F. (1938). Physicists and fairies. Philosophy of Science, 5, 132–165.Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. & Terveen, L. (1995). Foundational Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science: Impasse and Solution. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1997). Discursive, rhetorical, and ideological messages. In McGarty, C. & Haslam, S. A. (Eds.), The Message of Social Psychology: Perspectives on Mind in Society (pp. 36–53). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M. (2005). Object concepts and action. In Pecher, D. & Zwaan, R. A. (Eds.), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking (pp. 8–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brewer, M. & Hewstone, M. (2004). Introduction. In Brewer, M. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), Social Cognition (pp. xi–xii). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Carr, H. A. (1915). Review of J. B. Watson (1914). Behavior: an introduction to comparative psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 12, 308–312.Google Scholar

Connelly, J. & Costall, A. (2000). R. G. Collingwood and the idea of an historical psychology. Theory & Psychology, 10, 147–170.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (1988). A closer look at direct perception. In Gellatly, A., Rogers, D., & Sloboda, J. A. (Eds.), Cognition and Social Worlds (pp. 10–21). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (1990). Picture perception as “indirect” perception. In Landwehr, K. (Ed.), Ecological Perception Research, Visual Communication and Aesthetics (pp. 15–22). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (1991). Graceful degradation: Cognitivism and the metaphors of the computer. In Still, A.. & Costall, A. (Eds.), Against Cognitivism (pp. 151–170). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (1995). Socializing affordances. Theory and Psychology, 5, 467–481.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2004). From Darwin to Watson (and cognitivism) and back again: The principle of animal-environment mutuality. Behavior & Philosophy, 32, 179–195.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2006a). “Introspectionism” and the mythical origins of scientific psychology. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 634–654.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2006b). On being the right size: Affordances and the question of scale. In Lock, G. & Molyneaux, B. (Eds.), Confronting Scale in Archaeology: Issues of Theory and Practice (pp. 15–26). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2007). Bringing the body back to life: James Gibson's ecology of agency. In Zlatev, J., Ziemke, T., Frank, R., & Dirven, R. (Eds.), Body, Language and Mind. Vol. 1: Embodiment (pp. 241–270). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2012). Introspection and the myth of methodological behaviourism. In Clegg, J. W. (Ed.), Self-observation in the Social Sciences (pp. 67–80). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2013). The unconscious theory in modern cognitivism. In Racine, T. P. & Slaney, K. L. (Eds.), A Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Use of Conceptual Analysis in Psychology (pp. 312–327). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Costall, A. & Dreier, O. (2006). Doing Things with Things: The Design and Use of Objects. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Costall, A., Leudar, I., & Reddy, V. (2006). Failing to see the irony in “mind-reading.” Theory & Psychology, 16, 163–167.Google Scholar

Costall, A. P. & Still, A. W. (1989). James Gibson's theory of direct perception and the problem of cultural relativism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19, 433–441.Google Scholar

Cronon, W. (Ed.) (1996). Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Danziger, K. (1997). The varieties of social construction. Theory & Psychology, 7, 399–416.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1910). The influence of Darwin on philosophy. In The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy and Other Essays (pp. 1–19). New York: Henry Holt & Co. (First published in Popular Science Monthly, July 1909.)Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1914/1977). Psychological doctrine and philosophical teaching. In Morgenbesser, S. (Ed.), Dewey and His Critics (pp. 439–445). New York: Journal of Philosophy. (First published in the Journal of Philosophy Psychology and Scientific Methods, 1914, 11(19).)Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1917). The need for a recovery of philosophy. In Dewey, J. (Ed.), Essays in the Pragmatic Attitude (pp. 3–69). New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and Nature. New York: Dover. (Based on the Paul Carus lectures of 1925.)Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1969). The Quest for Certainty. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar

Duncker, K. (1947). Phenomenology and epistemology of consciousness of objects. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 7, 505–542.Google Scholar

Edwards, D. (1995). A commentary on discursive and cultural psychology. Culture and Psychology, 1, 55–65.Google Scholar

Ellen, R. (1996). Introduction. In Ellen, Roy & Fukui, Katsuyoshi (Eds.), Redefining Nature: Ecology, Culture and Domestication (pp. 1–36). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Falmagne, R. J. (1995). The abstract and the concrete. In Martin, L. M. W., Nelson, K., & Tobach, E. (Eds.), Sociocultural Psychology: Theory and Practice of Doing and Knowing (pp. 205–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1981). Representations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, W. J. & Nunez, R. (2001). Restoring to cognition the forgotten primacy of action, intention and emotion. In Nunez, R. & Freeman, W. J. (Eds.), Reclaiming Cognition: The Primacy of Action, Intention and Emotion (pp. ix–xix). Thoverton, UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. (1975). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1950). The implications of learning theory for social psychology. In Miller, J. G. (Ed.), Experiments in Social Process (pp. 120–133). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Gregory, R. L. (1989). Dismantling reality. In Lawson, H. & Appignanesi, L. (Eds.), Dismantling Truth: Reality in the Post-modern World (pp. 93–100). London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

Hall, S. (1997a). Introduction. In Hall, Stuart (Ed.), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (pp. 1–11). London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Hall, S. (1997b). The work of representation. In Hall, Stuart (Ed.), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (pp. 13–64). London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Hammond, H. & Keat, R. (1991). Understanding Phenomenology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335–346.Google Scholar

Harré, R. (2002). Cognitive Science: A Philosophical Introduction. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Heft, H. (2001). Ecological Psychology in Context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the Legacy of William James's Radical Empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Heidbreder, E. (1933). Seven Psychologies. New York: Century.Google Scholar

Hirsch, P. D. (2000). Beyond discipline: toward effective partnerships between conservation biologists and ecological anthropologists. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Ecology, University of Georgia.Google Scholar

Holt, E. B. (1914). The Concept of Consciousness. London: George Allen.Google Scholar

Holt, E. B., Marvin, W. T., Montague, W. P., Perry, R. B., Pitkin, W. B., & Spaulding, E. G. (1912). The New Realism: Cooperative Studies in Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35, 441–456.Google Scholar

Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Janlert, L. E. (1987). Modeling change: the frame problem. In Pylyshyn, Z. W. (Ed.), The Robot's Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Joerges, B. (1988). Technology in everyday life: Conceptual queries. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour; 18, 219–237.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. (1988). The Computer and the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Joravsky, D. (1989). Russian Psychology: A Critical History. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kessen, W. (1981). Early settlements in new cognition. Cognition, 10, 167–171.Google Scholar

Kwa, C. (1987). Representations of nature mediating between ecology and science policy: The case of the International Biological Programme. Social Studies of Science, 17, 413–442.Google Scholar

Leeper, R. (1951). Cognitive processes. In Stevens, S. S. (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology (pp. 730–757). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Leslie, A. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94, 412–426.Google Scholar

Leudar, I. & Costall, A. (Eds.). (2004a). Theory of mind. Theory & Psychology (special issue), 14(5), 571–752.Google Scholar

Leudar, I. & Costall, A. (2004b). On the persistence of the problem of other minds’ in psychology: Chomsky, Grice and “theory of mind.” Theory & Psychology, 14, 603–662.Google Scholar

Leudar, I. & Costall, A. (2009). Against Theory of Mind. London: Macmillan Palgrave.Google Scholar

Lovejoy, A. O. (1929). The Revolt against Dualism: An Inquiry Concerning the Existence of Ideas. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

MacMurray, J. (1961). Persons in Relation. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Marshall, H. H. (1996). Clarifying and implementing contemporary psychological perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 31, 29–34.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1938). The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mead, M. (1975). Visual anthropology in a discipline of words. In Hoskins, P. (Ed.), Principles of Visual Anthropology (pp. 3–10). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., Pribram, K., & Galanter, E. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Nadler, S. (1997). Descartes's dualism? Philosophical Books, 38(3), 157–169.Google Scholar

Pecher, D. & Zwaan, R. A. (Eds.). (2005). Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pylyshyn, Z. (1986). Computation and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Reed, E. S. (1988). James J. Gibson and the Psychology of Perception. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Ryle, G. (1999). Reason. Linacre Journal, 3, 71–84.Google Scholar

Schiffer, M. B. (with Miller, A. R.). (1999). The Material Life of Human Beings: Artifacts, Behavior, and Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shalin, D. N. (1993). Modernity, postmodernism, and pragmatist inquiry: An introduction. Symbolic Interaction, 16, 303–332.Google Scholar

Shaw, R. E. (2003). The agent–environment interface: Simon's indirect or Gibson's direct coupling. Ecological Psychology, 15, 37–106.Google Scholar

Shweder, R. A. & Sullivan, M. A. (1990). The semiotic subject of cultural psychology. In Previn, L. A. (Ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 399–416). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Smith, E. R. & MacKie, D. M. (2000). Social Psychology (2nd edn.). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Stevens, S. (Ed.). (1997). Conservation through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Still, A. & Costall, A. (1991a). The mutual elimination of dualism in Vygotsky and Gibson. In Still, A.. & Costall, A. (Eds.), Against Cognitivism (pp. 225–236). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Still, A. & Costall, A. (Eds.). (1991b). Against Cognitivism. London: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L. A., & Sears, D. O. (1994). Social Psychology (8th edn.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Thomas, J. (1999). Some problems with the notion of external symbolic storage, and the case of Neolithic material culture in Britain. In Renfrew, C., & Scarre, C. (Eds.), Cognition and Material Culture. Oxford: McDonald Institute Monographs.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. & Call, J. (1997). Primate Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1995). Foreword. In Baron-Cohen, S., Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind (pp. ix–xviii). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Toulmin, S. (1976). Knowing and Acting: An Invitation to Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. V. (1996). The Role of Abstract Rationality in Vygotsky's Image of Mind. In Tryphon, A. & Voneche, J. (Eds.), Piaget-Vygotsky: The Social Genesis of Thought (pp. 25–43). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Abbey, E. A. (2007). Perpetual uncertainty of cultural life: Becoming reality. In Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 362–372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arcoverde, R., Amazonas, M. C., & De Lima, R. (2016). Descriptions and interpretations on self-harming. Culture & Psychology, 22(1), 110–127.Google Scholar

Aron, L. (1991). The patient's experience of the analyst's subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1, 29–51.Google Scholar

Aron, L. (2001). A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Baranger, M. & Baranger, W. (1961/2008). The analytic situation as a dynamic field. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 89(4), 795–826.Google Scholar

Beebe, B. & Lachmann, F. (1998). Co-constructing inner and relational process: Self and mutual regulation in infant research and adult treatment. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 15(4), 480–516.Google Scholar

Beebe, B. & Lachmann, F. (2003). The relational turn in psychoanalysis: A dyadic systems view from infant research. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 39(3), 379–409.Google Scholar

Benjamin, J. (1988). The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Benjamin, J. (1998). Like Subjects Love Objects: Essays on Recognition and Sexual Difference. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of Thirdness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 5–46.Google Scholar

Boston Change Process Study Group (BCPSG). (2007). The foundational level of psychodynamic meaning: Implicit process in relation to conflict, defense, and the dynamic unconscious. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88, 843–860.Google Scholar

Brinkmann, S. (2014). Psychiatric diagnoses as semiotic mediators: The case of ADHD. Nordic Psychology, 66, 121–134.Google Scholar

Brinkmann, S. (2016). Toward a cultural psychology of mental disorder: The case of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Culture & Psychology, 22, 80–93.Google Scholar

Bromberg, P. M. (1996). Standing in the spaces: The multiplicity of self and the psychoanalytic relationship. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 32, 509–535.Google Scholar

Bromberg, P. M. (1998). Standing in the Spaces. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar

Bromberg, P. M. (2000). Potholes on the royal road: Or is it an abyss. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 36, 5–28.Google Scholar

Bromberg, P. M. (2003). Something this way comes – Trauma, dissociation, and conflict: The space where psychoanalysis, cognitive science, and neuroscience overlap. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 20, 558–574.Google Scholar

Bromberg, P. M. (2006). Awakening the Dreamer: Clinical Journeys. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bromberg, P. M. (2011). Shadow of the Tsunami and the Growth of the Relational Mind. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning: Four Lectures on Mind and Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cushman, P. (1995). Constructing the Self, Constructing America: A Cultural History of Psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Cushman, P. (2015). Relational psychoanalysis as political resistance. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 51, 423–459.Google Scholar

Duveen, G. (2007). Culture and social representations. In Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 543–559). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eagle, M. N. (2003). The postmodern turn in psychoanalysis: A critique. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 20, 411–424.Google Scholar

Ehrenberg, D. (1992). The Intimate Edge: Extending the Reach of Psychoanalytic Interaction. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from Freedom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Fromm, E. (1951). The Forgotten Language: An Introduction to the Understanding of Dreams, Fairy Tales and Myths. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar

Fromm, E. (1956). The Art of Loving. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Fromm-Reichmann, F. (1950). Principles of Intensive Psychotherapy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. R. (2001). The analyst's participation: A new look. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 49, 359–381.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. R. & Mitchell, S. A. (1983). Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Harris, A. E. (2005). Gender as Soft Assembly (Relational Perspectives series). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Harris, A. E. (2011). The relational tradition: Landscape and cannon. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 59, 701–735.Google Scholar

Hart, A. (2017). From multicultural competence to radical openness: A psychoanalytic engagement of otherness. The American Psychoanalyst, 51, 12–27.Google Scholar

Heft, H. (2012). Environment, cognition and culture: Reconsidering the cognitive map. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 14–25.Google Scholar

Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Towards a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7, 243–281. DOI: 10.1177/1354067X0173001.Google Scholar

Hermans, H. J. M. & Kempen, H. J. G. (1993). The Dialogical Self: Meaning as Movement. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hoffman, I. Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst's experience. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19, 389–322.Google Scholar

Hoffman, I. Z. (1991). Discussion: Towards a social-constructionist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1, 74–105.Google Scholar

Horwitz, A. V. & Wakefield, J. C. (2007). The Loss of Sadness: How Psychiatry Transformed Normal Sorrow into Depressive Disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

James, W. (1890/1950). Principles of Psychology (vols. I and II). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Lehman, O. V. (2014). Towards dialogues with and within silent psychotherapy sessions: Why the person of the therapist and the client matters. Culture & Psychology, 20, 537–546.Google Scholar

Levenson, E. A. (1979). Language and healing. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 7, 271–282.Google Scholar

Levenson, E. A. (1979/2005). The Fallacy of Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar

Levenson, E. A. (1982). Follow the fox: An inquiry into the vicissitudes of psychoanalytic supervision. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 18, 1–15.Google Scholar

Levenson, E. A. (1983/2005). The Ambiguity of Change. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar

Levenson, E. A. (1989). Whatever happened to the cat? Interpersonal perspectives on the self. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 25, 537–553.Google Scholar

Levenson, E. A. (1991). The Purloined Self: Interpersonal Perspectives in Psychoanalysis. New York: Contemporary Psychoanalysis Books.Google Scholar

Levenson, E. A. (2002). And the last shall be the first: Some observations on the evolution of interpersonal psychoanalysis. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 38, 277–285.Google Scholar

Levenson, E. A. (2003). On seeing what is said: Visual aids to the psychoanalytic process. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 39, 233–249.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2003a). Dialogicality and Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2003b). Constitution of the self: Intersubjectivity and dialogicality. Culture & Psychology, 9, 249–259.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (Works of George Herbert Mead, vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mills, J. (2011). Conundrums: A Critique of Relational Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Mitchell, S. A. (1995). Hope and Dread in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Mitchell, S. A. (1997). Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. Hillside, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1961/2008). Psychoanalysis: Its Image and Its Public. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Orange, D. M. (2003). Why language matters to psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic dialogues, 13, 77–103.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1878/1982). How to make our ideas clear. In Thayer, H. S. (Ed.), Pragmatism: The Classic Writings (pp. 79–100). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. J. (2015a). Introduction: The postmodern turn in relational psychoanalysis. In Rosenbaum, P. (Ed.). Making Our Ideas Clear: Pragmatism and Psychoanalysis, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. J. (2015b). Harry Stack Sullivan and Charles Sanders Peirce: The impact of early pragmatism on interpersonal psychoanalysis. In. Rosenbaum, P. (Ed.), Making Our Ideas Clear: Pragmatism and Psychoanalysis. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. J. (2016). Roger Bibace: An interpersonal thinker. In Valsiner, J., Watzlawik, M., & Kriebel, A. (Eds.), Particulars and Universals in Clinical and Developmental Psychology: Critical Reflections. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. J. & Liebert, H. (2015). Reframing the conversation on college student mental health. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 29, 179–196.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. (2015). From meaning to sensemaking: Implications of a semiotic and dynamic model of mind for psychoanalysis. In. Rosenbaum, P. (Ed.), Making Our Ideas Clear: Pragmatism and Psychoanalysis. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Salvatore, S. (2016). Psychology in Black and White: The Project of a Theory-Driven Science. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Stern, D. B. (2004). The eye sees itself: Dissociation enactment and the achievement of conflict. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 40, 197–237.Google Scholar

Stern, D. B. (2003). Unformulated Experience: From Dissociation to Imagination in Psychoanalysis. Hillside, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar

Stern, D. B. (2009). Partners in Thought: Working with Unformulated Experience, Dissociation and Enactment (Psychoanalysis in a New Key Book Series). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Stern, D. B. (2013). Field theory in psychoanalysis, Part I: Harry Stack Sullivan and Madeleine and Willy Baranger. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 23(5), 487–501.Google Scholar

Stern, D. B. (2015). Relational Freedom: Emergent Properties of the Interpersonal Fields (Psychoanalysis in a New Key Book Series). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Stern, D. B., Mann, C. H., Kantor, S., & Schlesinger, G. (Eds.). (1995). Pioneers of Interpersonal Psychoanalysis. London: Analytic Press.Google Scholar

Sullivan, H. S. S. (1938/1995). Data of psychiatry. In Stern, D. B., Mann, C. H., Kantor, S., & Schlesinger, G. (Eds.), Pioneers of Interpersonal Psychoanalysis (pp. 1–26). London: Analytic Press.Google Scholar

Sullivan, H. S. S. (1950). The illusion of individual personality. Psychiatry, 13, 317–332.Google Scholar

Sullivan, H. S. S. (1953a). Conceptions of Modern Psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Sullivan, H. S. S. (1953b). The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Sullivan, H. S. S. (1953c). The Psychiatric Interview. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Thelen, E. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 255–283.Google Scholar

Thompson, C. (1950/2003). Psychoanalysis: Evolution and Development. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Tublin, S. (2011). Discipline and freedom in relational technique. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 47, 519–546.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2006). The semiotic construction of solitude. Sign Systems Studies, 34, 9–34.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in Minds and Societies: Foundations of Cultural Psychology. New York: SAGE.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2009). Cultural psychology today: Innovations and oversights. Culture & Psychology, 15, 5–39.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2014). An Invitation to Cultural Psychology. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Verma, J., & Themel, M. (2000). “I have some faith and at the same time I don't believe in it” – Cognitive polyphasia and culture change in India. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 301–314.Google Scholar

Wagner, W., Sen, R., Permanadeli, R., & Howarth, C. S. (2012). The veil and Muslim women's identity: Cultural pressures and resistances to stereotyping. Culture & Psychology, 18, 521–541.Google Scholar

Blechner, M. J. (2005). The gay Harry Stack Sullivan: Interactions between his life, clinical work and theory. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 41(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1995). Culture and cognitive development: From cross-cultural research to creating systems of cultural mediation. Culture & Psychology, 1, 25–54.Google Scholar

Harre, R. (2015). The persons as the nexus of patterns of discursive practices. Culture & Psychology, 21, 492–504.Google Scholar

Marsico, G. (2015). Striving for the new: Cultural psychology as a developmental science. Culture & Psychology, 21, 445–454.Google Scholar

Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2, 201–218.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. J. (2013). The role of projective identification in constructing the “Other”: Why do Westerners want to “liberate” Muslim women? Culture & Psychology 19(2), 213–224. DOI: 10.1177/1354067X12456719.Google Scholar

Shewder, R. (1990). Thinking Through Cultures: Expeditions in Cultural Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2015). Where are you, Culture & Psychology? Making of an interdisciplinary field. Culture & Psychology, 21, 419–428.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (2007). Contemporary socio-cultural research: Uniting culture, society and psychology. In Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T., Duveen, G., Gillespie, A., Ivinson, G., & Psaltis, C. (2003). The use of symbolic resources in developmental transitions. Culture & Psychology, 9, 415–448.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. & Gillespie, A. (2015). Internalization: How culture becomes mind. Culture & Psychology, 21, 477–491.Google Scholar