Tables
4.1Parameters of transitivity as adapted from Hopper and Thompson (1980)
6.1Distribution of periphrastic future and morphological future across regions
6.3Contribution of linguistic and extralinguistic factors selected as significant predictor of PF across two data sets
10.1Schematic representation, Sp_ToBI labels, and phonetic descriptions of the most common pitch accents in Spanish
10.2Schematic representation, Sp_ToBI labels, and phonetic descriptions of the most common boundary tones in Spanish
12.2Word formation processes involving semantic change, but no category change (sample)
13.2Type of reference and subject expression in second-person singular
18.1Nuclear pitch accent contours for Italian and German by topic type
23.1Salient features in innovative and conservative varieties of Spanish spoken in Spain
23.2Realization of intervocalic /ð/ in European and American Spanishes
23.3Realization of postvocalic /s/ in European and American Spanishes
23.4Examples of neutralization of distinction between liquid consonants
23.5Examples of regressive assimilation in consonant clusters in word-medial position
23.6Phonotactics of southern varieties of European Spanish in word-final position
23.8Usage rates (percent) of the subjunctive past perfect forms in Spanish
24.1Pronoun rates (percent) for three generational groups in New York City
25.1Characteristics of Hispanics with origins in Puerto Rico, Cuba, and the Dominican Republic
27.1Development of the periphrastic and simple past in Romance Languages
27.2Factor weights for temporal reference of present perfect across three centuries (Peninsular Spanish)
