References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 February 2018
Illustrated by
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Effective ScientistA Handy Guide to a Successful Academic Career, pp. 264 - 272Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Bialystok, E, Craik, FIM, Luk, G (2012) Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16:240–50.Google Scholar
Gold, BT, Kim, C, Johnson, NF, Kryscio, RJ, Smith, CD (2013) Lifelong bilingualism maintains neural efficiency for cognitive control in aging. The Journal of Neuroscience 33:387–96.Google Scholar
Laurance, WF, Carolina Useche, D, Laurance, SG, Bradshaw, CJA (2013) Predicting publication success for biologists. BioScience 63:817–23.Google Scholar
Herrando-Pérez, S, Delean, S, Brook, BW, Bradshaw, CJA (2012) Density dependence: an ecological Tower of Babel. Oecologia 170:585–603.Google Scholar
Herrando-Pérez, S, Brook, BW, Bradshaw, CJA (2014) Ecology needs a convention of nomenclature. BioScience 64:311–21.Google Scholar
Mogie, M (2004) In support of null hypothesis significance testing. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B-Biological Sciences 271:S82–S84.Google Scholar
Elliott, LP, Brook, BW (2007) Revisiting Chamberlain: multiple working hypotheses for the 21st century. BioScience 57:608–14.Google Scholar
Burnham, KP, Anderson, DR (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2nd Edition (Springer-Verlag, New York, NY).Google Scholar
Burnham, KP, Anderson, DR (2004) Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods and Research 33:261–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, WA, Barker, RJ (2006) Model weights and the foundations of multimodel inference. Ecology 87:2626–35.Google Scholar
Lukacs, PM, Thompson, WL, Kendall, WL, et al. (2007) Concerns regarding a call for pluralism of information theory and hypothesis testing. Journal of Applied Ecology 44:456–60.Google Scholar
Gaertner-Johnston, L (2006) “That” or “Which”? Business Writing. www.businesswritingblog.com/business_writing/2006/01/that_or_which.html (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Tang, M (2011) Passive voice vs. active voice. sciencewritingblog.wordpress.com/2011/04/12/passive-voice-vs-active-voice (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Day, RA, Gastel, B (2012) How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. 7th Edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hofmann, AH (2009) Scientific Writing and Communication: Papers, Proposals, and Presentations. 1st Edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
Schimel, J (2012) Writing Science. How to Write Papers that Get Cited and Proposals that Get Funded. (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
Pautasso, M (2013) Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS Computational Biology 9:e1003149.Google Scholar
Vetter, D, Rücker, G, Storch, I (2013) Meta-analysis: a need for well-defined usage in ecology and conservation biology. Ecosphere 4:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurance, WF, Useche, DC, Rendeiro, J, et al. (2012) Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature 489:290–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atlas Collaboration, CMS Collaboration, Aad G, et al. (2015) Combined measurement of the Higgs Boson mass in pp collisions at √s = 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS experiments. Physical Review Letters 114:191803.Google Scholar
Ball, P (2016) The mathematics of science's broken reward system. Nature doi:10.1038/nature.2016.20987.Google Scholar
Ware, M, Mabe, M (2015) The STM report: an overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. (International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands).Google Scholar
Jinha, AE (2010) Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence. Learned Publishing 23:258–63.Google Scholar
Pyke, GH (2014) Achieving research excellence and citation success: what's the point and how do you do it? BioScience 64:90–1.Google Scholar
Seglen, PO (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal 314:497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacsó, P (2008) The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Web of Science. Online Information Review 32:673–88.Google Scholar
Ramírez, A, García, E, Del Río, J (2000) Renormalized Impact Factor. Scientometrics 47:3–9.Google Scholar
Althouse, BM, West, JD, Bergstrom, CT, Bergstrom, T (2009) Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60:27–34.Google Scholar
Neff, BD, Olden, JD (2010) Not so fast: inflation in Impact Factors contributes to apparent improvements in journal quality. BioScience 60:455–9.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, CT, West, JD, Wiseman, MA (2008) The Eigenfactor™ Metrics. The Journal of Neuroscience 28:11433–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moed, HF (2010) Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics 4:265–77.Google Scholar
González-Pereira, B, Guerrero-Bote, VP, Moya-Anegón, F (2010) A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: the SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics 4:379–91.Google Scholar
Guerrero-Bote, VP, Moya-Anegón, F (2012) A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: the SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics 6:674–88.Google Scholar
Hirsch, JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102:16569–72.Google Scholar
Braun, T, Glänzel, W, Schubert, A (2006) A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics 69:169–73.Google Scholar
Delgado-López-Cózar, E, Cabezas-Clavijo, Á (2013) Ranking journals: could Google Scholar Metrics be an alternative to Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Rank? Learned Publishing 26:101–13.Google Scholar
Falagas, ME, Kouranos, VD, Arencibia-Jorge, R, Karageorgopoulos, DE (2008) Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. The FASEB Journal 22:2623–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacsó, P (2008) The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar. Online Information Review 32:437–52.Google Scholar
Jacsó, P (2008) The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Scopus. Online Information Review 32:524–35.Google Scholar
Aksnes, DW, Sivertsen, G (2004) The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators. Scientometrics 59:213–24.Google Scholar
Aksnes, DW (2003) Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation 12:159–70.Google Scholar
Sumner, P, Vivian-Griffiths, P, Boivin, J, et al. (2016) Exaggerations and caveats in press releases and health-related science news. PLoS One 11:e0168217.Google Scholar
Osterloh, M, Kieser, A (2015) Double-blind peer review: how to slaughter a sacred cow. Incentives and Performance: Governance of Research Organizations, eds Welpe, MI, Wollersheim, J, Ringelhan, S, and Osterloh, M (Springer International Publishing, Cham), pp 307–21.Google Scholar
Faggion, Jr , CM (2016) Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer. British Dental Journal 220:167–8.Google Scholar
Didham, RK, Leather, SR, Basset, Y (2017) Don't be a zero-sum reviewer. Insect Conservation and Diversity 10:104.Google Scholar
Schmitt, J (2015) Can't disrupt this: Elsevier and the 25.2 billion dollar a year academic publishing business. Medium.com. medium.com/@jasonschmitt/can-t-disrupt-this-elsevier-and-the-25–2-billion-dollar-a-year-academic-publishing-business-aa3b9618d40a#.kbdywg8ns (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Relx Group (2016) Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2015. (mslgroup.co.uk, London, United Kingdom) www.relx.com/investorcentre/reports%202007/Documents/2015/relxgroup_ar_2015.pdf (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Larivière, V, Haustein, S, Mongeon, P (2015) The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS One 10:e0127502.Google Scholar
John Wiley and Sons Inc. (2016) John Wiley and Sons, Inc. and Subsidiaries Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2016. (Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA) wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-370237.html (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Springer (2013) Springer Science+Business Media. General Overview and Financial Performance 2012. (Springer, Berlin, Germany) static.springer.com/sgw/documents/1412702/application/pdf/Annual_Report_2012_01.pdf (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Sage (2016) Sage Group plc Preliminary Results for the year ending 30 September 2015. (Sage, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) www.sage.com/#/media/group/files/Sage%20Group%20Results%202015.pdf (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Holcombe, A (2015) Scholarly publisher profit update. Alex Holcombe's Blog. alexholcombe.wordpress.com/2015/05/21/scholarly-publisher-profit-update (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
de Vries, J (2012) Thousands of scientists vow to boycott Elsevier to protest journal prices. ScienceInsider www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/02/thousands-scientists-vow-boycott-elsevier-protest-journal-prices (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Van Noorden, R (2014) The scientists who get credit for peer review. Nature doi:10.1038/nature.2014.16102.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IJ, et al. (2016) The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3:160018.Google Scholar
Hollowell, J, Nicholas, G (2008) Intellectual property issues in archaeological publication: some questions to consider. Archaeologies 4:208–17.Google Scholar
Teferra, D, Altbachl, PG (2004) African higher education: challenges for the 21st century. Higher Education 47:21.Google Scholar
Bhandari, R, Blumenthal, P eds (2011) International Students and Global Mobility in Higher Education: National Trends and New Directions. (Palgrave MacMillan, New York, NY).Google Scholar
Slippers, B, Vogel, C, Fioramonti, L (2015) Global trends and opportunities for development of African research universities. South African Journal of Science 111:a0093.Google Scholar
Altbach, PG (2013) Brain drain or brain exchange? International Higher Education 72:2–4.Google Scholar
Grace, OM (2017) Crowdfunding your science. Nature Ecology and Evolution Community natureecoevocommunity.nature.com/users/54273-olwen-m-grace/posts/18355-crowdfunding-your-science (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, SM, Bruer, JT (1997) Science funding and private philanthropy. Science 277:621.Google Scholar
Weingart, P, Guenther, L (2016) Science communication and the issue of trust. Journal of Science Communication 15:1–11.Google Scholar
Cook, I, Grange, S, Eyre-Walker, A (2015) Research groups: how big should they be? PeerJ 3:e989.Google Scholar
Conti, A, Liu, CC (2015) Bringing the lab back in: personnel composition and scientific output at the MIT Department of Biology. Research Policy 44:1633–44.Google Scholar
Ceci, SJ, Williams, WM (2011) Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108:3157–62.Google Scholar
Helmer, M, Schottdorf, M, Neef, A, Battaglia, D (2017) Gender bias in scholarly peer review. eLife 6:e21718.Google Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, S, Glynn, CJ, Huge, M (2013) The Matilda Effect in science communication. Science Communication 35:603–25.Google Scholar
Moss-Racusin, CA, Dovidio, JF, Brescoll, VL, Graham, MJ, Handelsman, J (2012) Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109:16474–9.Google Scholar
Aldercotte, A, Guyan, K, Lawson, J, Neave, S, Altorjai, S (2017) ASSET 2016: experiences of gender equality in STEMM academia and their intersections with ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability and age. (Equality Challenge Unit, London, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
Grunspan, DZ, Eddy, SL, Brownell, SE, Wiggins, BL, Crowe, AJ, Goodreau, SM (2016) Males under-estimate academic performance of their female peers in undergraduate biology classrooms. PLoS One 11:e0148405.Google Scholar
Kimmel, MS (2009) Gender equality: not for women only. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion at Work: A Research Companion, ed Èzbilgin, MF (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, United Kingdom), pp 359–71.Google Scholar
Holter, ØG (2013) Masculinities, gender equality and violence. Masculinities and Social Change 2:51–81.Google Scholar
Miller, T, del Carmen Triana, M (2009) Demographic diversity in the boardroom: mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies 46:755–86.Google Scholar
McGuire, KL, Primack, RB, Losos, EC (2012) Dramatic improvements and persistent challenges for women ecologists. BioScience 62:189–96.Google Scholar
O'Brien, KR, Hapgood, KP (2012) The academic jungle: ecosystem modelling reveals why women are driven out of research. Oikos 121:999–1004.Google Scholar
Mayer, AL, Tikka, PM (2008) Family-friendly policies and gender bias in academia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 30:363–74.Google Scholar
Martin, JL (2014) Ten simple rules to achieve conference speaker gender balance. PLoS Computational Biology 10:e1003903.Google Scholar
Favaro, B, Oester, S, Cigliano, JA, et al. (2016) Your science conference should have a code of conduct. Frontiers in Marine Science 3:103.Google Scholar
Davis, KS (1999) Why science? women scientists and their pathways along the road less traveled. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 5:129–53.Google Scholar
Handelsman, J, Cantor, N, Carnes, M, et al. (2005) More women in science. Science 309:1190.Google Scholar
Benderly, B (2011) A Nobel Laureate's advice to women scientists. Science Magazine Blog. blogs.sciencemag.org/sciencecareers/2011/06/its-a-good-thin.html (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Folkins, CH, Sime, WE (1981) Physical fitness training and mental health. American Psychologist 36:373–89.Google Scholar
Hillman, CH, Erickson, KI, Kramer, AF (2008) Be smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9:58–65.Google Scholar
Deslandes, A, Moraes, H, Ferreira, C, et al. (2009) Exercise and mental health: many reasons to move. Neuropsychobiology 59:191–8.Google Scholar
Kramer, AF, Erickson, KI (2007) Capitalizing on cortical plasticity: influence of physical activity on cognition and brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11:342–8.Google Scholar
Brisswalter, J, Collardeau, M, René, A (2002) Effects of acute physical exercise characteristics on cognitive performance. Sports Medicine 32:555–66.Google Scholar
Kashihara, K, Maruyama, T, Murota, M, Nakahara, Y (2009) Positive effects of acute and moderate physical exercise on cognitive function. Journal of Physiological Anthropology 28:155–64.Google Scholar
Hillman, CH, Motl, RW, Pontifex, MB, et al. (2006) Physical activity and cognitive function in a cross-section of younger and older community-dwelling individuals. Health Psychology 25:678–87.Google Scholar
Penedo, FJ, Dahn, JR (2005) Exercise and well-being: a review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 18:189–93.Google Scholar
Fontaine, KR (2000) Physical activity improves mental health. The Physician and Sportsmedicine 28:83–4.Google Scholar
Saxena, S, Van Ommeren, M, Tang, KC, Armstrong, TP (2005) Mental health benefits of physical activity. Journal of Mental Health 14:445–51.Google Scholar
Callaghan, P (2004) Exercise: a neglected intervention in mental health care? Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 11:476–83.Google Scholar
Weyerer, S, Kupfer, B (1994) Physical exercise and psychological health. Sports Medicine 17:108–16.Google Scholar
Dudo, A, Besley, JC (2016) Scientists’ prioritization of communication objectives for public engagement. PLoS One 11:e0148867.Google Scholar
Eysenbach, G (2011) Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13:e123.Google Scholar
Shuai, X, Pepe, A, Bollen, J (2012) How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: article downloads, Twitter mentions, and citations. PLoS One 7:e47523.Google Scholar
Priem, J, Costello, KL (2010) How and why scholars cite on Twitter. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 47:1–4.Google Scholar
Thelwall, M, Haustein, S, Larivière, V, Sugimoto, CR (2013) Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS One 8:e64841.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, CJA, Ehrlich, PR (2015) Killing the Koala and Poisoning the Prairie: Australia, America, and the Environment. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
Linden, B (2008) Basic blue skies research in the UK: are we losing out? Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration 3:3.Google Scholar
House of Lords (2010) Setting priorities for publicly funded research. Volume II: Evidence. (United Kingdom House of Lords, The Stationery Office Limited, London, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
Bradshaw, CJA, Brook, BW (2014) Human population reduction is not a quick fix for environmental problems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 111:16610–15.Google Scholar
Martínez, DM, Ebenhack, BW (2008) Understanding the role of energy consumption in human development through the use of saturation phenomena. Energy Policy 36:1430–5.Google Scholar
Heard, BP, Brook, BW, Wigley, TML, Bradshaw, CJA (2017) Burden of proof: a comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 76:1122–33.Google Scholar
WWF (2016) Living Planet Report 2016. (WWF, Gland, Switzerland) wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/all_publications/lpr_2016 (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Pimm, SL, et al. (2014) The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344:1246752.Google Scholar
Cribb, J (2014) Poisoned Planet. (Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest, New South Wales, Australia).Google Scholar
IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. IPCC WGII AR5 Technical Summary. (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland).Google Scholar
Lehmann, E (2012) Conservatives lose faith in science over last 40 years. Scientific American www.scientificamerican.com/article/conservatives-lose-faith-in-science-over-last-40-years (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Dierkes, M, von Grote, C eds (2000) Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology. (Routledge, London, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
Master, Z, Resnik, DB (2013) Hype and public trust in science. Science and Engineering Ethics 19:321–35.Google Scholar
Oliver, JE, Rahn, WM (2016) Rise of the Trumpenvolk. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 667:189–206.Google Scholar
Lamberts, R, Grant, WJ (2011) The government's war on science: deliberate attack, or abuse by neglect? The Conversation theconversation.com/the-governments-war-on-science-deliberate-attack-or-abuse-by-neglect-208 (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Mervis, J (2016) Senator's attack on ‘cheerleading’ study obscures government's role in training scientists. ScienceInsider doi:10.1126/science.aaf9993.Google Scholar
Cairney, P, Oliver, K (2016) If scientists want to influence policymaking, they need to understand it. The Guardian www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2016/apr/27/if-scientists-want-to-influence-policymaking-they-need-to-understand-it (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Shanley, P, López, C (2009) Out of the loop: why research rarely reaches policy makers and the public and what can be done. Biotropica 41:535–44.Google Scholar
Gibbons, P, Zammit, C, Youngentob, K, et al. (2008) Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policy-makers in natural resource management. Ecological Management and Restoration 9:182–6.Google Scholar
Garvin, T (2001) Analytical paradigms: the epistemological distances between scientists, policy makers, and the public. Risk Analysis 21:443–56.Google Scholar
Choi, BCK, Pang, T, Lin, V, et al. (2005) Can scientists and policy makers work together? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 59:632.Google Scholar
Science and Technology Australia (2017) Open Letter for Science. (Science and Technology Australia) scienceandtechnologyaustralia.org.au/open-letter-for-science (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Caldeira, K, Emanuel, K, Hansen, J, Wigley, T (2013) Top climate change scientists’ letter to policy influencers. CNN edition.cnn.com/2013/11/03/world/nuclear-energy-climate-change-scientists-letter/index.html (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Bryner, J (2013) NASA climate scientist arrested in pipeline protest. Live Science www.livescience.com/27117-nasa-climate-scientist-arrest.html (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Maynard-Casely, H (2017) Inspiring to speak out – two physicists who changed the world. The Conversation theconversation.com/inspiring-to-speak-out-two-physicists-who-changed-the-world-72654 (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar
Frid, A (2012) Conservation value of paddy wagon currency: civil disobedience by scientists. Conservation Bytes conservationbytes.com/2012/05/12/conservation-value-of-paddy-wagon-currency (accessed 17 October 2017).Google Scholar