Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2017
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing , pp. 253 - 260Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Aleinikoff, TA, ‘Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing’ (1986) 96 Yale LJ 943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, L and Schauer, F, ‘Law's Limited Domain Confronts Morality's Universal Empire’ (2006) 48 Wm & Mary L Rev 1579Google Scholar
Alexander, L and Sherwin, E, The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law (Duke University Press 2001)Google Scholar
Alexy, R, A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification (Ruth Adler and Neil MacCormick trs, Oxford University Press 1989)Google Scholar
Alexy, R, A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Julian Rivers tr, Oxford University Press 2002)Google Scholar
Alexy, R, ‘Constitutional Rights, Balancing, and Rationality’ (2003) 16 2 Ratio Juris 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R, ‘On Balancing and Subsumption. A Structural Comparison’ (2003) 16 4 Ratio Juris 433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R, ‘Balancing, Constitutional Review, and Representation’ (2005) 3 4 International Journal of Constitutional Law 572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R, ‘Thirteen Replies’ in Pavlakos, G (ed), Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy (Hart 2007)Google Scholar
Alexy, R, ‘The Construction of Constitutional Rights’ (2010) 4 1 Law & Ethics of Human Rights 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R, ‘The Weight Formula’ in Stelmach, J and Załuski, W, Game Theory and the Law (Copernicus Center Press 2011)Google Scholar
Allan, TRS, ‘Democracy, Legality, and Proportionality’ in Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley, and Webber, Grégoire (eds), Proportionality and the Rule of Law (Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Alon-Shenker, P and Davidov, G, ‘Applying the Principle of Proportionality in Employment and Labour Law Contexts’ (2013) 59 McGill LJ 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, GEM, ‘Who Is Wronged? Philippa Foot on Double Effect: One Point’ in Geach, M and Gormally, L (eds), Human Life, Action, and Ethics: Essays by GEM Anscombe (Imprint Academic 2005)Google Scholar
Barak, A, Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations (Cambridge University Press 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham J, , ‘Nonsense Upon Stilts’ in Engelmann SG, (ed), Selected Writings (Yale University Press 2011)Google Scholar
Bernstein, P, ‘Cuba: Last Look at an Alternative Legal System’ (1993) 7 Temp Int'l & Comp LJ 191Google Scholar
Bomhoff, J, Balancing Constitutional Rights: The Origins and Meanings of Postwar Legal Discourse (Cambridge University Press 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bücheler, G, Proportionality in Investor-State Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, R, ‘Introduction’ in Chang, R (ed), Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason (Harvard University Press 1997)Google Scholar
Choudhry, S, ‘So What Is the Real Legacy of Oakes? Two Decades of Proportionality Analysis under the Canadian Charter's Section 1’ 34 Sup Ct LR 501Google Scholar
Christoffersen, J, Fair Balance: A Study of Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights (Martinus Nijhof 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Eliya, M and Porat, I, ‘American Balancing and German Proportionality: The Historical Origins’ (2010) 8 Int'l J Const L 263Google Scholar
Cohen-Eliya, M and Porat, I ‘Proportionality and the Culture of Justification’ (2011) 59 2 American Journal of Comparative Law 463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Eliya, M and Porat, I Proportionality and Constitutional Culture (Cambridge University Press 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Silva, VA, ‘Comparing the Incommensurable: Constitutional Principles, Balancing and Rational Decision’ (2011) 31 2 OJLS 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R, ‘On Gaps in the Law’ in Amselek, P and MacCormick, N (eds), Controversies About Law's Ontology (Edinburgh University Press 1991)Google Scholar
Ekins, R, ‘Legislating Proportionately’ in Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley, and Webber, Grégoire (eds), Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning (Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Endicott, T, ‘Proportionality and Incommensurability’ (2012) 40 Oxford Legal Research Paper 1Google Scholar
Endicott, T, ‘Legal Interpretation’ in Marmor, A (ed), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law (Routledge 2012)Google Scholar
Finnis, J, Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory (Oxford University Press 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J, ‘Endorsing Discrimination Between Faiths: A Case Extreme Speech?’, in Hare, I and Weinstein, J (eds), Extreme Speech and Democracy (Oxford University Press 2009)Google Scholar
Finnis, J, Human Rights and Common Good, Collected Essays: Volume III (Oxford University Press 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J, Intention and Identity, Collected Essays: Volume II (Oxford University Press 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J, Philosophy of Law, Collected Essays: Volume IV (Oxford University Press 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J, Reason in Action, Collected Essays: Volume I (Oxford University Press 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J, ‘Judicial Power: Past, Present, and Future’ (a lecture in Gray's Inn Hall, 20 October 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J, Boyle, J, and Grisez, G, Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism (Oxford University Press 1987)Google Scholar
Fish, MJ, ‘An Eye for an Eye: Proportionality as a Moral Principle of Punishment’ (2008) 28 OJLS 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardbaum, S, ‘A Democratic Defense of Constitutional Balancing’ (2010) 4 1 Law & Ethics of Human Rights 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J, ‘Proportionality and Democratic Constitutionalism’ in Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley, and Webber, Grégoire (eds), Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning (Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Gardner, J, ‘Rationality and the Rule of Law in Offences Against the Person’ (1994) 53 03 Cambridge LJ 502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelbach, JB and Kobayashi, BH, ‘The Law and Economics of Proportionality in Discovery’ Georgia LRGoogle Scholar
Greer, S, ‘“Balancing” and the European Court of Human Rights: A Contribution to the Habermas–Alexy Debate’ (2004) 63 Cambridge LJ, 412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D, ‘Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence’ (2007) 57 2 The University of Toronto LJ 383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzmán Brito, A, Andrés Bello Codificador. Historia De La Fijación Y Codificación Del Derecho Civil En Chile (Ediciones Universidad de Chile 1982)Google Scholar
Hart, HLA. ‘Rawls on Liberty and Its Priority’ (1973) 40 3 The University of Chicago LR 534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, HLA. ‘Bentham and the United States of America’ (1976) 19 The Journal of Law & Economics 547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckels, C, Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge University Press 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, M, ‘Introduction’ in Hunt, Murray, Hooper, Haley, and Yowell, Paul (eds) Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart 2015)Google Scholar
Jackson, VC, ‘Being Proportional About Proportionality’ (2004) 21 Const Commentary 803Google Scholar
Jackson, VC, ‘Constitutional Law in an Age of Proportionality’ (2015) 124 Yale LJ 3094Google Scholar
Jestaedt, M, ‘The Doctrine of Balancing – Its Strengths and Weaknesses’ in Klatt, M (ed), Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy (Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A, Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press 2009)Google Scholar
Kelsen, H, General Theory of Law and State (Anders Wedberg tr, Transaction Publishers 2005)Google Scholar
Kennedy, IM, ‘Cuba's Ley Contra La Vagancia – The Law on Loafing’ (1972) 20 UCLA L. Rev. 1177Google Scholar
Khosla, M, ‘Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?: A Reply’ (2010) 8 2 Int'l J Const L 298Google Scholar
King, J, ‘Parliament's Role Following Declarations of Incompatibility under the Human Rights Act’ in Hunt, Murray, Hooper, Haley, and Yowell, Paul (eds) Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart 2015)Google Scholar
Klatt, M and Meister, M, ‘Proportionality – A Benefit to Human Rights? Remarks on the ICON Controversy’ (2012) 10 3 Int'l J Const L 687Google Scholar
Klatt, M and Meister, M, The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality (Oxford University Press 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kommers, D and Miller, RA, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (3rd edn, Duke University Press 2012)Google Scholar
Kumm, M, ‘Constitutional Rights as Principles: On the Structure and Domain of Constitutional Justice’ (2004) 2 Int'l J Const L 574Google Scholar
Kumm, M, ‘Who Is Afraid of the Total Constitution?: Constitutional Rights as Principles and the Constitutionalization of Private Law’ (2006) 7 4 German LJ 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M, ‘The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-Based Proportionality Review’ (2010) 4 2 Law & Ethics of Human Rights 142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M, ‘Political Liberalism and the Structure of Rights: On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement’ in Pavlakos, G (ed), Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy (Hart 2007)Google Scholar
Kumm, M and Walen, AD, ‘Human Dignity and Proportionality: Deontic Pluralism in Balancing’ in Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley, and Webber, Grégoire (eds), Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning (Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Letsas, G, A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letsas, G, ‘Rescuing Proportionality’ in Cruft, Rowan, Liao, S Matthew, and Renzo, Massimo (eds), Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2015)Google Scholar
Locke, J, Two Treatises of Government (first published 1689, Laslett, Peter ed, Cambridge University Press 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, D, ‘Incommensurable Values, Rational Choice, and Moral Absolutes’ (1990) 38 Clev St LR 65Google Scholar
McHarg, A, ‘Reconciling Human Rights and the Public Interest: Conceptual Problems and Doctrinal Uncertainty in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (1999) 62 5 The Modern LR 671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, B, ‘Justification and Rights Limitations’ in Huscroft G, (ed) Expounding the Constitution (Cambridge University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Möller, K, ‘Balancing and the Structure of Constitutional Rights’ (2007) 5 3 Int'l J Const L 453Google Scholar
Möller, K, The Global Model of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, K, ‘Proportionality and Rights Inflation’ in Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley, and Webber, Grégoire (eds) Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning (Cambridge University Press 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, K, ‘“Balancing as Reasoning” and the Problems of Legally Unaided Adjudication: A Rejoinder to Francisco Urbina’ (2014) 12 Int'l J Const L 222Google Scholar
Mureinik, E, ‘A Bridge to Where: Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights’ (1994) 10 S Afr J Hum Rts 31Google Scholar
Panaccio, CM, ‘In Defence of Two-Step Balancing and Proportionality in Rights Adjudication’ (2011) 24 1 Can J L & Jur 109Google Scholar
Pila, J, ‘Pluralism, Principles and Proportionality in Intellectual Property’ (2014) 34 OJLS 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Harvard University Press illustrated, reprint 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J, Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason (Oxford University Press 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Réaume, D, ‘Limitations on Constitutional Rights: The Logic of Proportionality’ (2009) 2009 26 Oxford Legal Research Paper Series 1Google Scholar
Rivers, J, ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’ (2006) 65 1 Cambridge LJ 174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, J, ‘A Theory of Constitutional Rights and the British Constitution’ (translator's foreword to Alexy R, A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press 2002)Google Scholar
Salas, L, ‘The Emergence and Decline of the Cuban Popular Tribunals’ (1983) Law and Society Review 587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, M, Public Philosophy: Essays on Morality in Politics (Harvard University Press 2005)Google Scholar
Schauer, F, Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (Oxford University Press 1991)Google Scholar
Schauer, F, ‘Freedom of Expression Adjudication in Europe and America: A Case Study in Comparative Constitutional Architecture’ in Nolte, G (ed) European and US Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2005)Google Scholar
Schauer, F, ‘Balancing, Subsumption, and the Constraining Role of Legal Text’ in Klatt, M (ed), Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy (Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar
Schlink, B, ‘Proportionality in Constitutional Law: Why Everywhere but Here’ (2012) 22 Duke J Comp & Int'l L 291Google Scholar
Möller, K, ‘Proportionality (1)’, in Rosenfeld, M and Sajó, A (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar
Schneiderman, D, ‘Proportionality and Constitutional Culture (book review)’ (2015) 13 Int'l J Const L 769Google Scholar
Simmonds, NE, ‘Review of Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy’ (2013) 129 LQR 292Google Scholar
Sloane, RD, ‘Puzzles of Proportion and the “Reasonable Military Commander”: Reflections on the Law, Ethics, and Geopolitics of Proportionality’ (2015) 6 Harvard National Security Journal 299Google Scholar
Solum, LB, ‘The Supreme Court in Bondage: Constitutional Stare Decisis, Legal Formalism, and the Future of Unenumerated Rights’ (2006) 9 U Pa J Const L 155Google Scholar
St Jeanos, CJ, ‘Dolan v. Tigard and the Rough Proportionality Test: Roughly Speaking, Why Isn't a Nexus Enough?’ (1995) 63 Fordham LR 1883Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A and Mathews, J, ‘Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism’ (2008) 47 72 Colum J Transnat'l L 72Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A and Mathews, J, ‘All Things in Proportion? American Rights Review and the Problem of Balancing’ (2011) 60 Emory LJ 797Google Scholar
Sunstein, C, ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreements in Constitutional Law’ (2007) 74 Social Research 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C and Vermeule, A, ‘Interpretation and Institutions’ (2003) 101 4 Michigan LR 885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsakyrakis, S, ‘Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?’ (2009) 7 3 Int'l J Const L 468Google Scholar
Tsakyrakis, S, ‘Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?: A Rejoinder to Madhav Khosla’ (2010) 8 2 Int'l J Const L 307Google Scholar
Urbina, F, ‘“Balancing as Reasoning” and the Problems of Legally Unaided Adjudication: A Reply to Kai Möller’ (2014) 12 Int'l J Const LGoogle Scholar
Veel, PEN, ‘Incommensurability, Proportionality, and Rational Legal Decision-Making’ (2010) 4 2 Law & Ethics of Human Rights 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdirame, G, ‘Rescuing Human Rights from Proportionality’ in Cruft, Rowan, Liao, S Matthew, and Renzo, Massimo (eds), Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2015)Google Scholar
Waldron, J, ‘Introduction’ in Waldron, J (ed), Theories of Rights (Oxford University Press 1984)Google Scholar
Waldron, J, ‘Fake Incommensurability: A Response to Professor Schauer’ (1993) 45 Hastings LJ 813Google Scholar
Waldron, J, ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’ (2005) 115 Yale LJ 1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J, Torture, Terror, and Trade-Offs: Philosophy for the White House (Oxford University Press 2010)Google Scholar
Walen, A, ‘Doing, Allowing, and Disabling: Some Principles Governing Deontological Restrictions’ (1995) 80 2 Philosophical Studies 183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, G, The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights (Cambridge University Press 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, G, ‘Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship’ (2010) 23 1 Can JL & Juris 179Google Scholar
Webber, G, ‘Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitation’ (2013) 2 Public Law 433Google Scholar
Webber, G, ‘On the Loss of Rights’ in Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley, and Webber, Grégoire (eds) Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning (Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Weber, M, ‘Politics as Vocation’ in Gerth, HH and Wright, Mills C (eds) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (Routledge 2009)Google Scholar
Young, AL, ‘Proportionality Is Dead: Long Live Proportionality!’ in Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley, and Webber, Grégoire (eds), Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning (Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Yowell, P, ‘Legislation, Common Law, and the Virtue of Clarity’ in Ekins, R (ed), Modern Challenges to the Rule of Law (LexisNexis NZ 2011)Google Scholar
Yowell, P, ‘Empirical Research in Judicial Review’ in Huber, H and Ziegler, K, Current Problems in the Protection of Human Rights: Perspectives from Germany and the UK (Hart 2013)Google Scholar
Yowell, P, ‘Proportionality in United States Constitutional Law’ in Lazarus, Liora, McCrudden, Christopher, and Bowles, Nigel (eds) Reasoning Rights: Comparative Engagements (Hart 2013)Google Scholar