Ahearn, K. 2016. ‘Mary Astell’s Account of Feminine Self-Esteem’, in Sowaal, A. and Weiss, P. A. (eds.), Feminist Interpretations of Mary Astell, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 35–56.Google Scholar

Almond, P. C. 1999. Adam and Eve in Seventeenth-Century Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Anscombe, E. and Geach, P. (trans. and eds.) 1954. Descartes: Philosophical Writings, London: Nelson.Google Scholar

Aquinas, St T. 1964. St. Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, St. Bonaventure: On the Eternity of the World, trans. Vollert, C., Kendzierski, L. H., and Byrne, P. M., Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar

Aquinas, St T. 1975. Summa Contra Gentiles Book Three: Providence, Part 1, trans. Bourke, V. J., Notre Dame, IL: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Ariew, R. and Garber, D. 1998. ‘Biobiliographical Appendix’, in Garber, D. and Ayers, M. (eds.), Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, vol. II, pp. 1397–471.Google Scholar

Aristotle, 1984. ‘Physics’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, vol. I, pp. 315–446.Google Scholar

Ashplant, T. G. and Wilson, A. 1988. ‘Present-Centered History and the Problem of Historical Knowledge’, The Historical Journal 31: 253–73.Google Scholar

Astell, M. 1704. Moderation Truly Stated: Or, A Review of a Late Pamphlet, Entitul’d, Moderation a Vertue. With a Prefatory Discourse to Dr. D’Aveanant, Concerning His Late Essays on Peace and War, London: J. L. for Rich. Wilkin.Google Scholar

Astell, M. 1996a. Reflections on Marriage, in Springborg, P. (ed.), Astell: Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–80.Google Scholar

Astell, M. 1996b. ‘An Impartial Enquiry into The Causes Of Rebellion and Civil War In This Kingdom’, in Springborg, P.(ed.), Astell: Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.129–98.Google Scholar

Astell, M. 2002. A Serious Proposal to the Ladies, Parts I and II, (ed.) Springborg, P., Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Astell, M. 2013. The Christian Religion, as Professed by a Daughter of the Church of England, (ed.) Broad, J., Toronto: Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies and Iter Publishing.Google Scholar

Astell, M. and Norris, J. 2005. Letters Concerning the Love of God, Between the Author of the Proposal to the Ladies and Mr. John Norris, (eds.) Taylor, E. D. and New, M., Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Atherton, M. 1993. ‘Cartesian Reason and Gendered Reason’, in Antony, L. M. and Witt, C. (eds.), A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Atherton, M.(ed.). 1994. Women Philosophers of the Early Modern Period, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Baar, M.. 2004. ‘“God has Chosen You to Be a Crown of Glory for all Women!”: The International Network of Learned Women Surrounding Anna Maria van Schurman’, in van Dijk, S., Broomans, P., van der Meulen, J. F., and van Oostrum, P. (eds.), I Have Heard About You: Foreign Women’s Writing Crossing the Dutch Border: From Sappho to Selma Lagerlöff, Hilversum: Uitgeverij Verloren, pp. 108–49.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis, 1872. ‘A Briefe Discourse Touching the Happy Union of the Kingdome of England and Scotland’, in Spedding, J., Ellis, R. L., and Heath, D. D. (eds.), The Works of Francis Bacon, London: Longman, vol. 10, pp. 90–98.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis, 1890. ‘De Sapientia veterum’, in Spedding, J., Ellis, R. L., and Heath, D. D. (eds.), The Works of Francis Bacon, London: Longman, vol. 6, pp. 605–606.Google Scholar

Beek, P. van. 2010. The First Female University Student: Anna Maria van Schurman (1636), Utrecht: Igitur.Google Scholar

Bentley, R. 1842. The Correspondence of Richard Bentley, (ed.) Wordsworth, C., London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Bentley, R. 1976. Eight Boyle Lectures on Atheism, 1692, New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar

Bertoloni Meli, D. 1993. Equivalence and Priority: Leibniz vs. Newton, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Biener, Z. and Smeenk, C. 2012. ‘Cotes’ Queries: Newton’s Empiricism and Conceptions of Matter’, in Janiak, A. and Schliesser, E. (eds.), Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–137.Google Scholar

Blom, J. J. (ed.) 1978. Descartes: His Moral Philosophy and Psychology, Hassocks: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Bolton, M. B. 1993. ‘Some Aspects of the Philosophy of Catharine Trotter’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 31: 565–88.Google Scholar

Bougeant, G. H. 1726. Observations curieuses sur toutes les parties de la physique: extraits & recueillies des meilleurs mémoires, 3 vols., Paris.Google Scholar

Bowerbank, S. 1984. ‘The Spider’s Delight: Margaret Cavendish and the “Female” Imagination’, English Literary Renaissance 14: 392–408.Google Scholar

Boyle, D. 2006. ‘Fame, Virtue, and Government: Margaret Cavendish on Ethics and Politics’, Journal of the History of Ideas 67: 251–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, D. 2015. ‘Margaret Cavendish on Perception, Self-Knowledge, and Probable Opinion’, Philosophy Compass 10: 438–50.Google Scholar

Boyle, D. 2017. ‘Freedom and Necessity in the Work of Margaret Cavendish’, in Broad, J. and Detlefsen, K. (eds.), Women and Liberty 1600–1800: Philosophical Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boyle, R. 1999 [1663]. ‘Some Considerations Touching the Usefulness of Experimental Natural Philosophy’, in Hunter, M. and Davis, E. B. (eds.), The Works of Robert Boyle, London: Pickering and Chatto, vol. III.Google Scholar

Boyle, R. 2000 [1686]. ‘A Free Inquiry into the Vulgarly Received Notion of Nature’, in Hunter, M. and Davis, E. B. (eds.), The Works of Robert Boyle, London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar

Brading, K. 2011. ‘On Composite Systems: Descartes, Newton, and the Law-Constitutive Approach’, in Jalobeanu, D. and Anstey, P. R. (eds.), Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Motion: Descartes and Beyond, New York: Routledge, pp. 130–52.Google Scholar

Brading, K. 2012. ‘Newton’s Law-Constitutive Approach to Bodies: A Response to Descartes’, in Janiak, A. and Schliesser, E. (eds.), Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brink, J. R. 1991. ‘Bathsua Reginald Makin: “Most Learned Matron”’, Huntington Library Quarterly: 54: 313–26.Google Scholar

Broad, J. 2002. Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Broad, J. 2003. ‘Adversaries or Allies? Occasional Thoughts on the Masham-Astell Exchange’, Eighteenth-Century Thought 1: 123–49.Google Scholar

Broad, J. 2006. ‘A Woman’s Influence? John Locke and Damaris Masham on Moral Accountability’, Journal of the History of Ideas 67: 489–510.Google Scholar

Broad, J. 2015. The Philosophy of Mary Astell: An Early Modern Theory of Virtue, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Broad, J. 2017. ‘Early Modern Feminism and Cartesian Philosophy’, in Garry, A., Khader, S. J., and Stone, A. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Feminist Philosophy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Broad, J. in press. ‘Damaris Masham on Women and Liberty of Conscience’, in O’Neill, E. and Lascano, M. (eds.), Feminist History of Philosophy: The Recovery and Evaluation of Women’s Philosophical Thought, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Broad, J. and Green, K. 2009. A History of Women’s Political Thought in Europe, 1400–1700, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, S. 1997. ‘F. M. van Helmont: His Philosophical Connections and the Reception of His Later Cabbalistic Philosophy’, in Stewart, M. A. (ed.), Studies in Seventeenth Century European Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar

Bryson, C. 1998. ‘Mary Astell: Defender of the “Disembodied Mind”’, Hypatia 13: 40–62.Google Scholar

Buickerood, J. G. 2009. ‘Masham and Locke: Reason, Religion, and Education’, in Warren, K. (ed.), An Unconventional History of Western Philosophy: Conversations between Men and Women Philosophers, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 245–58.Google Scholar

Burian, R. M. 2003. ‘Comments on the Precarious Relationship between History and Philosophy of Science’, Perspectives on Science 10: 398–407.Google Scholar

Burnet, T. 1697. Remarks Upon an Essay Concerning Human Understanding, London.Google Scholar

Butler, J. 1729. Fifteen Sermons, 2nd edn., London: Knapton.Google Scholar

Carboncini, S. 1987. “L’encyclopédie et Christian Wolff: a propos de quelques articles anonymes”, Les Études Philosophiques 4: 489–504.Google Scholar

Cartwright, N. and Ward, K. 2016. Rethinking Order: After the Laws of Nature, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1653a. Poems and Fancies, London: T. R. for J. Martin and J. Allestrye.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1653b. ‘To all Writing Ladies’, in Cavendish 1653a, unnumbered.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1653c. ‘Similizing the Head of Man to the World’, in Cavendish 1653a, pp. 148–49.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1653d. ‘The Elysium’, in Cavendish 1653a, pp. 141–42.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1655a. The Worlds Olio Written by the Right Honourable, the Lady Newcastle, London: Printed for J. Martin and J. Allestrye.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1655b. ‘Allegory 20’, in Cavendish 1655a, p. 205.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1655c. ‘Preface’, in Cavendish 1655a, unnumbered.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1655d. Philosophical and Physical Opinions, London: J. Martin and J. Allestrye.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1655e. ‘To the Two Universities’, in Cavendish 1655d, unnumbered.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1655f. ‘An Epilogue to My Philosophical Opinions’, in Cavendish 1655d, unnumbered.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1656. Natures Pictures, London: Printed for J. Martin and J. Allestrye.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1662a. Playes Written by the Thrice Noble, Illustrious and Excellent Princess, the Lady Marchionesse of Newcastle, London: Printed by A. Warren for John Martin, James Allestrye and Tho. Dicas.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1662b. ‘The Lady Contemplation’, in Cavendish 1662a, pp. 181–246.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1662c. ‘Bell in Campo’, in Cavendish 1662a, pp. 579–633.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1662d. ‘The Female Academy’, in Cavendish 1662a, pp. 653–79.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1662e. ‘Natures Three Daughters’, in Cavendish 1662a, pp. 491–527.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1662f. ‘A Peasants Oration to Prove the Happiness of a Rural Life’, in Orations of Divers Sorts Accommodated to Divers Places Written by the Lady Marchioness of Newcastle, London, p. 248.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1663. Philosophical and Physical Opinions, 2nd edn., London: William Wilson.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1664a. CCXI Sociable Letters, London: William Wilson.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1664b. Philosophical Letters: Or, Modest Reflections Upon some Opinions in Natural Philosophy, Maintained by several Famous and Learned Authors of this Age, Expressed by Way of Letters, London.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1668a. Observations Upon Experimental Philosophy, London: Printed by A. Maxwell.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1668b. ‘To the Reader’, in Cavendish 1668a, unnumbered.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1668c. ‘An Argumental Discourse’, in Cavendish 1668a, unnumbered.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1668d. ‘Further Observations Upon Experimental Philosophy’, in Cavendish 1668a.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1668e. The Description of a New World, Called the Blazing-World, London: Printed by A. Maxwell.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1668f. ‘To all Noble and Worthy Ladies’, in Cavendish 1668e, unnumbered.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1668g. ‘Epilogue’, in Cavendish 1668e, unnumbered.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1668h. Grounds of Natural Philosophy Divided into Thirteen Parts: With an Appendix Containing Five Parts / Written by the … Duchess of Newcastle, London: Printed by A. Maxwell.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1671. Natures Picture Drawn by Fancies Pencil to the Life Being Several Feigned Stories, Comical, Tragical, Tragi-comical, Poetical, Romancical, Philosophical, Historical, and Moral: Some in Verse, Some in Prose, Some Mixt, and Some by Dialogues / Written by … the Duchess of Newcastle, London: Printed by A. Maxwell.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 1996 [1668]. Grounds of Natural Philosophy, London: facsimile reprint West Cornwall, CT.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 2001 [1668]. Observations upon Experimental Philosophy, ed. O’Neill, E., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cavendish, M. 2003. ‘A New World called the Blazing World’, in Political Writings, ed. James, Susan, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–110.Google Scholar

Center for Reformed Theology and Apologetics 2016. ‘Westminster Larger Catechism’, www.reformed.org/documents/wlc_w_proofs/index.html?mainframe=/documents/wlc_w_proofs/index_wlc_fs.html&main=/documents/wlc_w_proofs/WLC_Intro.html.Google Scholar

Chao, T. 2009. ‘Contemplation on the “World of My Own Creating”: Alchemical Discourses on Nature and Creation in The Blazing World (1666)’, NTU Studies in Language and Literature 57: 57–76.Google Scholar

Chao, T. 2012. ‘“Between Nature and Art”: The Alchemical Underpinnings of Margaret Cavendish’s Observations upon Experimental Philosophy and The Blazing World’, EURAMERICA 42: 45–82.Google Scholar

Charleton, W. 1668. The Ephesian and Cimmerian Matrons Two Notable Examples of the Power of Love & Wit, London: Printed for Henry Herringman.Google Scholar

Châtelet, É. 1740. Institutions de Physique, Paris: Prault.Google Scholar

Châtelet, É. 1742. Institutions Physiques de Madame la Marquise du Chastellet Adressés à M. son Fils: Nouvelle Édition, Corrigée et Augmentée Considérablement par l’Auteur, Amsterdam: Aux dépens de la Compagnie.Google Scholar

Châtelet, É. 1988. Institutions Physiques, reprinted in Wolff, C., Gesammelte Werke: Materialen und Dokumente, ed. École, J., Arndt, H. W., Theis, R., Schneiders, W., and Carboncini-Gavanelli, S., vol. XXVIII, Hildesheim and Zürich: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar

Clabaugh, G. K. 2010. ‘A History of Male Attitudes toward Educating Women’, Educational Horizons 88: 164–78.Google Scholar

Clarke, S. 1706. A Discourse Concerning the Unchangeable Obligations of Natural Religion, and the Truth and Certainty of the Christian Revelation, London.Google Scholar

Clarke, S. and Leibniz, G.W. 1717. A Collection of Papers, which Passed between the Late Learned Mr. Leibnitz and Dr. Clarke, in the years of 1715 and 1716, London: James Knapton.Google Scholar

Clucas, S. 2011. ‘Margaret Cavendish’s Materialist Critique of Van Helmontian Chymistry’, Ambix 58: 1–12.Google Scholar

Clucas, S. 2014. ‘“A Double Perception in All Creatures”: Margaret Cavendish’s Philosophical Letters and Seventeenth-Century Natural Philosophy’, in Siegfried, B. R. and Sarasohn, L. T. (eds.), God and Nature in the Thought of Margaret Cavendish, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 121–40.Google Scholar

Cockburn, C. T. 1702. A Defence of Mr. Locke’s Essay of Human Understanding, in Cockburn, C. T. 1751a, The Works of Mrs. Catharine Cockburn, ed. Birch, T., 2 vols, vol. I. London: Printed for J. and P. Knapton. pp. 44–111.Google Scholar

Cockburn, C. T. 1743. Remarks upon some Writers in the Controversy Concerning the Foundation of Moral Virtue and Moral Obligation, in C. T. Cockburn 1751a, pp. 380–450.Google Scholar

Cockburn, C. T. 1747. Remarks upon the Principles and most Considerable Passages of Dr.Rutherforth’s Essay, in Cockburn, C. T. 1751b,. The Works of Mrs. Catharine Cockburn, ed. Birch, T., 2 vols, vol. II. London: Printed for J. and P. Knapton, pp. 1–107Google Scholar

Cockburn, C. T. 1751a. The Works of Mrs. Catharine Cockburn, ed. Birch, T., 2 vols, vol. I. London: Printed for J. and P. KnaptonGoogle Scholar

Cockburn, C. T. 1751b. The Works of Mrs. Catharine Cockburn, ed. Birch, T., 2 vols, vol. II. London: Printed for J. and P. KnaptonGoogle Scholar

Cohen, I. B. 1999. Guide to the Principia, in Newton, I. 1999.Google Scholar

Cohen, S. M. 2016. ‘Aristotle’s Metaphysics’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/aristotle-metaphysics/.Google Scholar

Conway, A. 1690. Principia philosophiae antiquissimae ac recentissimae, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Conway, A. 1692. The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy, London.Google Scholar

Conway, A. 1982. Principia Philosophiae, ed. Loptson, P., The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Conway, A. 1992. The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More and their Friends, 1642–1684, ed. Nicolson, M. and Hutton, S.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Conway, A. 1996. The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy, trans. and eds. Coudert, A. P. and Corse, T., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Conway, A. 1998. The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy, ed. Loptson, P., Delmar, NY: Scholars Facsimile Reprints.Google Scholar

Cottegnies, L. 2014. ‘Brilliant Heterodoxy: The Plurality of Worlds in Margaret Cavendish’s Blazing World (1666) and Cyrano de Bergerac’s Estats de Empires de la lune (1657)’, in Siegfried, B. R. and Sarasohn, L. T. (eds.), pp. 107–20.Google Scholar

Coudert, A. 1975. ‘A Cambridge Platonist’s Kabbalist Nightmare’, Journal of the History of Ideas 36: 633–52.Google Scholar

Cowling, S. 2015. ‘Haecceitism’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/haecceitism/.Google Scholar

Crockett, T. 1999. ‘Continuity in Leibniz’s Mature Metaphysics’, Philosophical Studies 94: 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cudworth, R. 1678. The True Intellectual System of the Universe, London.Google Scholar

Conway, A. 1964. True Intellectual System of the Universe, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: F. Fromann Verlag.Google Scholar

Conway, A. 1996. A Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality with a Treatise of Freewill, ed. Hutton, S., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cunning, D. 2016. Cavendish: Arguments of the Philosophers, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Darnton, R. 1985. The Great Cat Massacre, and Other Episodes in French Cultural History, New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Daston, L. and Stolleis, M. (eds.) 2008. Natural Law and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe: Theology, Moral and Natural Philosophy, Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Dear, P. 2007. ‘A Philosophical Duchess: Understanding Margaret Cavendish and the Royal Society’, in Cummins, J. and Burchell, D. (eds.), Science, Literature, and Rhetoric in Early Modern England, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 125–44.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, M. 2003. ‘The Power of an Idea: Spinoza’s Critique of Pure Will’, Noûs 37: 200–31.Google Scholar

Densmore, D. 1999. ‘Cause and Hypothesis: Newton’s Speculation about the Cause of Universal Gravitation’, St. John’s Review 45: 94–111.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. 1643–1649. Correspondence with Elisabeth, in Shapiro, L. (ed.).Google Scholar

Descartes, R. 1984a. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D., 3 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, vol. II.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. 1984b. Meditations on First Philosophy, in Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D. (trans.), vol. II, pp. 1–62.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. 1985a. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D., 3 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, vol. I.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. 1985b. Principles of Philosophy, in Cottingham, , Stoothoff, , and Murdoch, (trans.), vol. I, pp. 177–291.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. 1985c. Treatise on Man, in Cottingham, , Stoothoff, , and Murdoch, (trans.), vol. I, pp. 99–108.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. 1985d. Discourse on the Method, in Cottingham, , Stoothoff, , and Murdoch, (trans.), vol. I, pp. 109–51.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. 1985e. Description of the Human Body, in Cottingham, , Stoothoff, , and Murdoch, (trans.), vol. I, pp. 314–24.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. 1991a. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D., and Kenny, A., 3 vols., Cambridge University Press, vol. III.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. 1991b. Principles of Philosophy, trans. Miller, V. R. and Miller, R. P., Kluwer.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. 1996. Oeuvres de Descartes, ed. Adam, C. and Tannery, P., Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar

Detlefsen, K. 2006. ‘Atomism, Monism, and Causation in the Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish’, Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 3: 199–240.Google Scholar

Detlefsen, K. 2007. ‘Reason and Freedom: Margaret Cavendish on the Order and Disorder of Nature’, Archiv fur Gerschichte der Philosophie 89: 157–91.Google Scholar

Detlefsen, K. 2009. ‘Margaret Cavendish on the Relation between God and World’, Philosophy Compass 4: 421–38.Google Scholar

Detlefsen, K. 2013. ‘Émilie Du Châtelet’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/emilie-du-chatelet/.Google Scholar

Detlefsen, K. 2017. ‘Cartesianism and its Feminist Promise and Limits’, in Gaukroger, S. and Wilson, C. (eds.), Descartes and Cartesianism: Essays in Honour of Desmond Clarke, Oxford University Press, pp. 191–206.Google Scholar

Detlefsen, K. 2017. ‘Women, Liberty and Forms of Feminism’, in Broad, J. and Detlefsen, K. (eds.), Women and Liberty, 1600–1800: Philosophical Essays, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Detlefsen, K., in press, ‘Du Châtelet and Descartes on the Roles of Hypothesis and Metaphysics in Natural Philosophy’.Google Scholar

Laertius, Diogenes 1925. Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, trans. Hicks, R. D., 2 vols, vol. II. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Downing, L. 1997. ‘Locke’s Newtonianism and Lockean Newtonianism’, Perspectives on Science 5: 285–310.Google Scholar

Downing, L. 2011. ‘Review of Newton as Philosopher’, The Philosophical Review 120: 124–9.Google Scholar

Drecoll, V. H. 2005. ‘“Quasi Legens Magnum Quendam Librum Naturae Rerum” (Augustine, C. Faust. 32:20): The Origin of the Combination Liber Naturae in Augustine and Chrystostomus’, in Vanderjagt, and van Berkel, (eds.), pp. 35–48.Google Scholar

Ducheyne, S. 2011. ‘Newton on Action at a Distance and the Cause of Gravity’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42: 154–9.Google Scholar

Duncan, S. 2016. ‘The Letters in the Philosophical Letters’, stewartduncan.org/letters-philosophical-letters/.Google Scholar

Duran, J. 2006. Eight Women Philosophers: Theory Politics and Feminismm, Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Edgar, T. 1632. The Lawes Resolution of Women’s Rights, London: Printed by [Miles Flesher for] John More Esq.Google Scholar

Epictetus 2009. The Enchiridion, or Handbook, trans. Long, G., Waikeke Island: The Floating Press.Google Scholar

Estienne, C. 1616. Maison Rustique, or The Countrey Farme, … Translated into English by Richard Surflet, Practitioner in Physicke. Now Newly Reuiewed, Corrected, and Augmented, with Diuers Large Additions, London: Printed by Adam Islip for John Bill.Google Scholar

Forstrom, K. J. 2010. John Locke and Personal Identity, Continuum: London.Google Scholar

Fox-Keller, E. 1980. ‘Baconian Science: A Hermaphroditic Birth’, Philosophical Forum 11: 299.Google Scholar

Frede, D. 2016. ‘Plato’s Ethics: An Overview’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/plato-ethics/.Google Scholar

Freedman, H. and Simon, M. (trans. and eds.) 1939. Midrash Rabbah, London: Soncino Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. 1990. ‘Kant and Newton: Why Gravity is Essential to Matter’, in Bricker, P. and Hughes, R. I. G. (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Furlong, E. 2013. Imagination, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fürst, A. and Hengstermann, C. (eds.) 2012. Autonomie und Menschenwürde Origenes in der Philosophie der Neuzeit, Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.Google Scholar

Fürst, A. and Hengstermann, C. (eds.) 2013. Die Cambridge Origensists. George Rust’s ‘Letter of Resolution Concerning Origen and the Chief of His Opinions’, Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.Google Scholar

Gallagher, C. 1988. ‘Embracing the Absolute: the Politics of the Female Subject in Seventeenth-Century England’, Genders 1: 24–39.Google Scholar

Garber, D. 1992. Descartes’s Metaphysical Physics, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Garber, D. 2009. Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbons, S. 1994. Kant’s Theory of Imagination: Bridging Gaps in Experience and Judgment, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Green, K. 2013. ‘Women’s Writing and the Early Modern Genre Wars’, Hypatia 28: 499–515.Google Scholar

Green, K. 2015. ‘A Moral Philosophy of their Own? The Moral and Political Thought of Eighteenth-Century British Women’, The Monist 98: 89–101.Google Scholar

Greengrass, M., Leslie, M. and Raylor, T. (eds.) 1994. Samuel Hartlib and Universal Reformation, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Groh, D. 2005. ‘The Emergence of Creation Theology: The Doctrine of the Book of Nature in the Early Church Fathers in the East and the West Up to Augustine’, in Vanderjagt, and van Berkel, (eds.), pp. 21–34.Google Scholar

Groh, R. 2005. ‘Theological and Philosophical Prerequisites for the Teaching of the “Book of Nature”’, in Vanderjagt, and van Berkel, (eds.), pp. 49–56.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, K. 2006. ‘The History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy: History or Philosophy’, in Haakonssen, K. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, 2 vols., Cambridge University Press, vol. 1, pp. 3–25.Google Scholar

Hagengruber, R. 2012. ‘Émilie Du Châtelet between Leibniz and Newton: The Transformation of Metaphysics’, in Hagengruber, R. (ed.), pp. 1–60.Google Scholar

Hagengruber, R. (ed.) 2012. Émilie Du Châtelet between Leibniz and Newton. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Halsall, P. 1996. ‘Medieval Sourcebook: Twelfth Ecumenical Council: Lateran IV 1215’, legacy.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/lateran4.asp.Google Scholar

Hankins, T. L. 1965. ‘Eighteenth-Century Attempts to Resolve the Vis Viva Controversy’, Isis 56: 281–97.Google Scholar

Harper, William. 2002. ‘Newton’s Argument for Universal Gravitation’, in Cohen, I. B. and Smith, George, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harth, E. 1992. Cartesian Women, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hartsoeker, N. 1730. Cours de Physique, La Haye: Chez Jean Swart.Google Scholar

Harvey, G. 1663. Archelogia Philosophica Nova, London: Printed by J.H. for Samuel Thomson.Google Scholar

Hayes, J. C. 1999. ‘Physics and Figuration in Du Châtelet’s “Institutions de Physique”’, in Hayes, J. C. (ed.), Reading the French Enlightenment: System and Subversion, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hayes, J. C. and Zinsser, J. P. (eds.) 2006. Émilie Du Châtelet: Rewriting Enlightenment Philosophy and Science, Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar

Helm, J. L. 1993. ‘Bathsua Makin’s An Essay to Revive the Antient Education of Gentlewomen in the Canon of Seventeenth-Century Educational Reform Tracts’, Cahiers Élisabéthains 44: 45–51.Google Scholar

Helmont, F. M.. 1694. Sedar Olam, London.Google Scholar

Henry, J. 1994. ‘Pray Do Not Ascribe That Notion to Me: God and Newton’s Gravity’, in Force, J. and Popkin, R. (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Henry, J. 2011. ‘Gravity and De Gravitatione: The Development of Newton’s Ideas on Action at a Distance’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42: 11–27.Google Scholar

Hesse, M. 1961. Forces and Fields: The Concept of Action at a Distance in the History of Physics, London: Nelson.Google Scholar

Holden, T., 2004. The Architecture of Matter, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hooke, R. 1665. Micrographia: Or Some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies Made by Magnifying Glasses: With Observations and Inquiries Thereupon, London: Printed for John Martyn.Google Scholar

Hume, D. 2007. A Treatise of Human Nature: A Critical Edition, ed. Norton, D. F. and Norton, M. J., 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, vol I.Google Scholar

Hutton, S. 1993. ‘Damaris Cudworth, Lady Masham: Between Platonism and Enlightenment’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 1: 29–54.Google Scholar

Hutton, S. 1996. ‘Anne Conway and Henry More on Preexistence and Universal Salvation’, in Baldi, M. (ed.), ‘Mind Senior to the World’: Stoicism e origenismo nella filosofia platonica del seicento inglese, Milan: Franco Angeli, pp. 113–25.Google Scholar

Hutton, S. 2004a. ‘Émilie Du Châtelet’s Institutions de Physique as a Document in the History of French Newtonianism’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35: 515–31.Google Scholar

Hutton, S. 2004b. Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hutton, S. 2010. ‘Damaris Masham’, in Schuurman, P. and Savonius Wroth, S. J. (eds.), The Continuum Companion to Locke, London: Continuum Press, pp. 72–6.Google Scholar

Hutton, S. 2012. ‘Anne Conway and Origen’, in Fürst, and Hengstermann, (eds.) 2012, pp. 221–34.Google Scholar

Hutton, S. 2013. ‘Debating the Faith: Damaris Masham (1658–1708) and Religious Controversy’, in Dunan-Page, A. and Prunier, C. (eds.), Debating the Faith, Religion, and Letter-Writing in Great Britain, 1550–1800, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 159–75.Google Scholar

Hutton, S. 2014. ‘Religion and Sociability in the Correspondence of Damaris Masham (1658–1708)’, in Apetrei, S. and Smith, H. (eds.), Religion and Women in Britain, c. 1660–1760, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 117–30.Google Scholar

Hutton, S. 2015. British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Huygens, C. 1944 [1690]. ‘Discours sur la cause de la Pesanteur’, in Oeuvres complètes, ed. Vollgraff, J. A., 22 vols., The Hague: Nijhoff, vol. XXI.Google Scholar

Iltis, C. 1970. ‘D’Alembert and the Vis Viva Controversy’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 1: 135–44.Google Scholar

Iltis, C. 1977. ‘Madame Du Châtelet’s Metaphysics and Mechanics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 8: 29–48.Google Scholar

Inwagen, P. 1978. ‘The Possibility of Resurrection’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9: 114–21.Google Scholar

James, S. 1999, ‘The Philosophical Innovations of Margaret Cavendish’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7: 219–44.Google Scholar

James, S. 2003. ‘Introduction’, in Margaret Cavendish: Political Writings, ed. James, S., Cambridge University Press, pp. ix–xxix.Google Scholar

Janiak, A. 2008. Newton as Philosopher, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Janiak, A. 2013. ‘Three Concepts of Causation in Newton’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44: 396–407.Google Scholar

Janiak, A. 2015. Newton, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Janiak, A. and Schliesser, E. (eds.) 2012. Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Janik, L. G. 1982. ‘Searching for the Metaphysics of Science: The Structure and Composition of Madame Du Châtelet’s Institutions de Physique, 1737–1740’, Studies in Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 201: 85–113.Google Scholar

Janssen-Lauret, F. 2018. ‘Logical Form, the First Person, and Naturalism: The Case Against Physicalist Imperialism’, in Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity (ed. Fernández Pinto, M., Mäki, U., Walsh, A.), Routledge, pp. 237–253.Google Scholar

Jolley, N. 2000. ‘Malebranche on the Soul’, in Nadler, S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche, Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–58.Google Scholar

Jorink, E. 2006. ‘Reading the Book of Nature in the Seventeenth-Century Dutch Republic’, in Vanderjagt, and van Berkel, (eds.), pp. 45–68.Google Scholar

Joy, L. 2006. ‘Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature’, in Park, K. and Daston, L. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 3: Early Modern Science, Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–105.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1910. Kants gesammelte Schriften, ed. der Wissenschaften, Königlich preussischen Akademie, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Keller, E. F. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Keller, E. F. 1997. ‘Producing Petty Gods: Margaret Cavendish’s Critique of Experimental Science’, English Literary History 64: 447–71.Google Scholar

Kerr, G. 2012. ‘A Thomistic Metaphysics of Creation’, Religious Studies 48: 337–56.Google Scholar

King, M. and Rabil, A. 2007. ‘The Other Voice in Early Modern Europe: Introduction to the Series’, in Shapiro, (ed.), pp. ix–xxviii.Google Scholar

Kinnaird, J. K. 1979. ‘Mary Astell and the Conservative Contribution to English Feminism’, The Journal of British Studies 19: 53–75.Google Scholar

Kochiras, H. 2009. ‘Gravity and Newton’s Substance Counting Problem’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40: 267–80.Google Scholar

Kochiras, H. 2011. “Gravity’s Cause and Substance Counting: Contextualizing the Problems’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42: 167–84.Google Scholar

Koyré, A. 1968. Newtonian Studies, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kühn, C. G. (ed.) 1822. Claudii Galeni Opera Omnia, Leipzig Cnobloch, vol. 3.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Laerke, M., Smith, J. and Schliesser, E. (eds.) 2013. Philosophy and its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mettrie, La, 1747. Histoire Naturelle de l’Ame, Paris.Google Scholar

Laqueur, T. 1992. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Larsen, A. R. 2016. Anna Maria van Schurman, ‘The Star of Utrecht’: The Educational Vision and Reception of a Savante, Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lascano, M. P. 2011. ‘Damaris Masham and “The Law of Reason or Nature”’, The Modern Schoolman 88: 245–65.Google Scholar

Lascano, M. P. 2013. ‘Anne Conway: Bodies in the Spiritual World’, Philosophy Compass 8: 327–36.Google Scholar

Laudan, L. 1968. ‘The Vis Viva Controversy: A Post-Mortem’, Isis 59: 130–43.Google Scholar

Leech, D. 2013. The Hammer of the Cartesians: Henry More’s Philosophy of Spirit and the Origins of Modern Atheism, Peeters: Leuven.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1923. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, ed. der Wissenschaften, Akademie, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, available at www.uni-muenster.de/Leibniz/DatenII4/Masham.pdf.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1965. Die philosophischen Schriften von Leibniz, ed. Gerhardt, C. I., 7 vols., Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1989a. Discourse on Metaphysics, in Leibniz: Philosophical Essays, trans. and eds. Garber, D. and Ariew, R., Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, pp. 35–68.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1989b. Monadology, in Leibniz: Philosophical Essays, trans. and eds. Garber, D. and Ariew, R., Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, pp. 213–25.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1998. G.W. Leibniz: Philosophical Texts, trans. and eds. Francks, R. and Woolhouse, R. S., Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lennon, T. 2007. ‘The Eleatic Descartes’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45: 29–47.Google Scholar

Levitin, D. 2015. Ancient Wisdom in the Age of The New Science: Histories of Philosophy in England, c. 1640–1700, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levitin, D. 2016. ‘Newton and Scholastic Philosophy’, British Society for the History of Science 49: 53–77.Google Scholar

Lewis, E. 2001. ‘The Legacy of Margaret Cavendish’, Perspectives on Science 9: 341–65.Google Scholar

Locke, J. 1694. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, 2nd edn., London.Google Scholar

Locke, J. 1794. The Works of John Locke, 9th edn., 9 vols., London: T. Longman.Google Scholar

Locke, J. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Locke, J. 1976–1982. The Correspondence of John Locke, ed. de Beer, E. S., 8 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Locke, J. 1989. Some Thoughts Concerning Education, ed. , J. W. and Yolton, J. S., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Locke, J. 1988. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, P., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Long, K. 2006. Hermaphrodites in Renaissance Europe, London: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar

Loptson, P. 1982. ‘Introduction’, in Conway 1982.Google Scholar

Loptson, P. 1995. ‘Anne Conway, Henry More and their World’, Dialogue 34: 139–46.Google Scholar

Loptson, P. 2001. Reality: Fundamental Topics in Metaphysics, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Lowenthal, D. 1999. The Past is a Foreign Country, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McGuire, J. E. 1994. ‘Natural Motion and its Causes: Newton on the ‘‘Vis Insita’’ of Bodies’, in Gill, M. Louise and Lennox, J. (eds.), Self-Motion from Aristotle to Newton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

McGuire, J. E. and Tamny, M. 1983. Certain Philosophical Questions, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McMullin, E. 1978. Newton on Matter and Activity, University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Maglo, K. 2008. ‘Mme Du Châtelet, l’Encyclopedie, et la philosophie des sciences’, in Émilie Du Châtelet: éclairages et documents nouveaux, Paris, Ferney-Voltaire: CIEDS, pp. 255–66.Google Scholar

Makin, B. 1616. Musa Virginea, London.Google Scholar

Makin, B. 1673. An Essay to Revive the Antient Education of Gentlewomen, in Religion, Manners, Arts & Tongues. With an Answer to the Objections Against this Way of Education, London: Printed by J. D. to be sold by Tho. Parkhurst, at the Bible and Crown at the lower end of Cheapside.Google Scholar

Malebranche, N. 1997a. The Search After Truth, in The Search After Truth and Elucidations of the Search After Truth, trans. and eds. Lennon, T. and Olscamp, P., Cambridge University Press, pp. xxxi–530Google Scholar

Malebranche, N. 1997b. Elucidiations of The Search After Truth, in The Search After Truth and Elucidations of the Search After Truth, trans. and eds. Lennon, T. and Olscamp, P., Cambridge University Press, pp. 533–753.Google Scholar

Malebranche, N. 1997c. Dialogues on Metaphysics and on Religion, trans. and eds. Jolley, N. and Scott, D., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Masham, D. 1696. A Discourse Concerning the Love of God, London.Google Scholar

Masham, D. 1705. Occasional Thoughts in Reference to a Vertuous or Christian Life, London.Google Scholar

Masham, D. 2005. Philosophical Works of Damaris, Lady Masham, ed. Buickerood, J., London: Thoemmes Continuum.Google Scholar

Massimi, M. 2010. Review of Newton as Philosopher, Philosophy 85: 157–63.Google Scholar

Massimi, M. 2012. ‘Kant’s Dynamical Theory of Matter in 1755, and its Debt to Speculative Newtonian Experimentalism’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 525–43.Google Scholar

Maupertuis, P.-L. M. 1732. Discours sur les differentes figures des astres, Paris.Google Scholar

Mendelson, S. 2014. ‘The God of Nature and the Nature of God’, in Siegfried, B. R. and Sarasohn, L. T. (eds.), pp. 27–41.Google Scholar

Mercer, C. 2001. Leibniz’s Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mercer, C. 2015. ‘Seventeenth-Century Universal Sympathy: Stoicism, Platonism, Leibniz, and Conway’, in Schliesser, E. (ed.), Sympathy: A History, Oxford University Press, pp. 107–38.Google Scholar

Mercer, C. 2017. ‘Descartes’ Debt to Teresa of Ávila, Or Why We Should Work on Women in the History of Philosophy’, Philosophical Studies 174: 2539–2555.Google Scholar

Merchant, C. 1979. ‘The Vitalism of Anne Conway: Its Impact on Leibniz’s Concept of the Monad’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 17: 255–69.Google Scholar

Merchant, C. 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, San Franscisco: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Merrens, R. 1996. ‘A Nature of “Infinite Sense and Reason”: Margaret Cavendish’s Natural Philosophy and the “Noise” of a Feminized Nature’, Women’s Studies 25: 421–38.Google Scholar

Metzger, H. 1938. Attraction universelle et religion naturelle chez quelques commentateurs anglais de Newton, Paris: Hermann et cie.Google Scholar

Mijuskovic, B. 1975. ‘Locke and Leibniz on Personal Identity’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 13: 205–14.Google Scholar

Millar, A. 1988. ‘Following Nature’, The Philosophical Quarterly 38: 165–85.Google Scholar

Miller, D. M. 2009. ‘Qualities, Properties and Laws in Newton’s Induction’, Philosophy of Science 76: 1052–63.Google Scholar

Milkov, N. 2011. ‘A Logical–Contextual History of Philosophy’, Southwest Philosophy Review 27: 21–9.Google Scholar

Milton, J. R. 1981. ‘The Origin and Development of the Concept of the “Laws of Nature”’, Archives Européens de Sociologie 22: 173–95.Google Scholar

Molières, J. P. 1734. Leçons de physique, contenant les elements de la physique déterminées par les seuls lois de mécanique, expliqués au Collège Royale, 4 vols., Paris.Google Scholar

Moore, A. W. 2012. The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

More, H. 1647. Philosophical Poems, Cambridge: Roger Daniel.Google Scholar

More, H. 1659. The Immortality of the Soul, London: J. Flesher.Google Scholar

More, H. 1660. An Explanation of the Grand Mystery of Godliness, London: J. Flesher.Google Scholar

More, H. 1878. The Complete Poems of Dr Henry More, ed. Grosart, A. B., Chertsey Worthies Library, Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

More, H. 1925. The Immortality of the Soul, in Philosophical Writings of Henry More, ed. MacKinnon, F. I., Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moulin, I. and Twetten, D. 2013. ‘Causality and Emanation in Albert’, in Resnick, I. M. (ed.), A Companion to William the Great, Leiden: Brill, pp. 694–724.Google Scholar

Myers, J. E. 2012. ‘Catharine Trotter and the Claims of Conscience’, Tusla Studies in Women’s Literature 31: 53–75.Google Scholar

Nadler, S. (ed.) 2002. A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Nagel, F. 2012. ‘“Sancti Bernoulli orate pro nobis”: Émilie Du Châtelet’s Rediscovered Essai sur l’optique and her Relation to the Mathematicians from Basel’, in Hagengruber, R. (ed.), pp. 97–112.Google Scholar

Newman, W. R. 2005. Promethean Ambitions, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Newton, I. 1731. A Treatise of the System of the World, 2nd edn., London: F. Fayram.Google Scholar

Newton, I. 1756. Four Letters from Sir Isaac Newton to Doctor Bentley, London: R. and J. Dodsley.Google Scholar

Newton, I. 1952. Opticks, or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light, New York: Dover (reprint of the fourth edition of 1730).Google Scholar

Newton, I. 1958. Isaac Newton’s Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy, ed. Cohen, I. B. and Schofield, R., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Newton, I. 1972. Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, ed. Koyré, A., Cohen, I. B. and Whitman, A., 3rd edn with variant readings, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Newton, I. 1983. Certain Philosophical Questions: Newton’s Trinity Notebook, ed. McGuire, J. E. and Tamny, M., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Newton, I. 1999. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, trans. Cohen, I. B. and Whitman, A., Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Newton, I. 2014. Newton: Philosophical Writings, ed. Janiak, A., revised edn., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Normore, C. 2006. ‘What is to be Done in the History of Philosophy?’, Topoi 25: 75–82.Google Scholar

Normore, C. 2008. ‘Descartes and the Metaphysics of Extension’, in Broughton, J. and Carriero, J. (eds.), A Companion to Descartes, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 271–87.Google Scholar

Norris, J. 1704. An Essay Towards the Theory of the Ideal or Intelligible World. Being the Relative Part of it. Wherein the Intelligible World is consider’d with relation to Human Understanding. Whereof some Account is here attempted and proposed. Part II, London: S. Manship and W. Hawes.Google Scholar

Nye, A. 1999. The Princess and the Philosopher: Letters of Elisabeth of the Palatine to René Descartes, Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Oakley, F. 1961. ‘Christian Theology and the Newtonian Science: The Rise of the Concept of the Laws of Nature’, Church History 30: 433–57.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, S. 1984. ‘“My Idea in Your Mind”: John Locke and Damaris Cudworth Masham’, in Perry, R. and Watson Brownley, M. (eds.), Mothering the Mind: Twelve Studies of Writers and Their Silent Partners, New York: Holmes and Meier, pp. 26–46.Google Scholar

Offen, K. 1988. ‘On the French Origin of the Words Feminism and Feminist’, Feminist Issues 8: 45–51.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Eileen 1993. ‘Influxus Physicus’, in Nadler, S. (ed.), Causation in Early Modern Philosophy, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 27–55.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Eileen 1998. ‘Disappearing Ink: Early Modern Women Philosophers and Their Fate in History’, in Kourany, J. (ed.), Philosophy in a Feminist Voice: Critiques and Reconstructions, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Eileen 1999. ‘Women Cartesians, “Feminine Philosophy”, and Historical Exclusion’, in Bordo, S. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of René Descartes, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 232–57.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Eileen 2001. ‘Introduction’, in Cavendish, M., Observations Upon Experimental Philosophy, pp. x–xxxvi.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Eileen 2006. ‘Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher (review)’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 44: 122–4.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Eileen 2011. ‘The Equality of Men and Women’, in Clarke, D. M. and Wilson, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Eileen 2013. ‘Margaret Cavendish, Stoic Antecedent Causes, and Early Modern Occasional Causes’, Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger 138: 311–26.Google Scholar

Osler, M. J. 2002. ‘The History of Philosophy and the History of Philosophy: A Plea for Textual History in Context’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 40: 529–33.Google Scholar

Ott, W. R. 2009. Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Papineau, D. 1977. ‘The Vis Viva Controversy: Do Meanings Matter?’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 8: 111–42.Google Scholar

Paracelsus, T. 1659. Paracelsus his Aurora, & Treasure of the Philosophers: As also the Water-Stone of the Wise Men; Describing the Matter of, and Manner how to Attain the Universal Tincture, London: J. H. Oxon.Google Scholar

Paracelsus, T. 1976. ‘The Aurora of the Philosophers’, in The Hermetic and Alchemical Writings of Paracelsus, ed. Waite, A. E., Berkeley: Shambhala Publications (reprint of 1894 edition published in London by James Elliot and Co.).Google Scholar

Paré, A. 1634. The Workes of that Famous Chirurgion Ambrose Parey Translated out of Latine and Compared with the French. by Th. Johnson, London: Printed by Th. Cotes and R. Young.Google Scholar

Pasnau, R. 2011. Metaphysical Themes 1274–1671, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Patton, L. (ed.) 2014. Philosophy, Science, and History: A Guide and Reader, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Perry, R. 1985. ‘Radical Doubt and the Liberation of Women’, Eighteenth Century Studies 18: 472–93.Google Scholar

Perry, R. 1986. The Celebrated Mary Astell: An Early English Feminist, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Plato 1928. Theaetetus, trans. Fowler, H. N., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Plato 1973. The Collected Dialogues of Plato, ed. Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Plotinus 1966. Ennead II, tr. Armstrong, A. H., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Poole, J. 1657. The English Parnassus, or, a Helpe to English Poesie, London.Google Scholar

Power, H. 1664. Experimental Philosophy, in Three Books, Containing New Experiments – Microscopical, Mercurial, Magnetical – with Some Deductions and Probable Hypotheses Raised from them, in Avouchment and Illustration of the Now Famous Atomical Hypothesis, London.Google Scholar

Price, B. 1996. ‘Feminine Modes of Knowing and Scientific Enquiry: Margaret Cavendish’s Poetry as a Case Study’, Wilcox, H. (ed.), Women and Literature in Britain, 1500–1700, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–142.Google Scholar

Pyle, A. 2003. Malebranche, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Radley, C. P. 2014. ‘Margaret Cavendish’s Cabballa: The Empress and the Spirits in The Blazing World’, in Siegfried, B. R. and Sarasohn, L. T. (eds.), pp. 161–70.Google Scholar

Ready, K. J. 2002. ‘Damaris Cudworth Masham, Catharine Trotter Cockburn, and the Feminist Legacy of Locke’s Theory of Personal Identity’, Eighteenth-Century Studies 35: 563–76.Google Scholar

Rée, J. 2002. ‘Women Philosophers and the Canon’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10: 641–52.Google Scholar

Reichenberger, A. 2012. ‘Leibniz’s Quantity of Force: A “Heresy”? Émilie Du Châtelet’s Institutions in the Context of the Vis Viva Controversy’, in Hagengruber, R. (ed.), pp. 113–56.Google Scholar

Reid, J. 2012. The Metaphysics of Henry More, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Rescher, N. 1996. Process Metaphysics, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Robertson, D. G. 2006. ‘Mind and Language in Philo’, Journal of the History of Ideas 67: 423–41.Google Scholar

Rohault, J. 1671. Traité de physique, Paris.Google Scholar

Rozemond, M. 1998. Descartes’s Dualism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rozemond, M. 2003. ‘Descartes, Mind-Body Union, and Holenmerism’, Philosophical Topics 31: 343–67.Google Scholar

Rozemond, M. 2008. ‘The Achilles Argument and the Nature of Matter in the Clarke Collins Correspondence’, in Lennon, T. M. and Stainton, R. J. (eds.), The Achilles of Rationalist Psychology, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 159–75.Google Scholar

Ruby, J. E. 1986. ‘The Origins of Scientific “Law”’, Journal of the History of Ideas 47: 341–59.Google Scholar

Rudder Baker, L. 1995. ‘Need a Christian be a Mind/Body Dualist?’, Faith and Philosophy 12: 489–504.Google Scholar

Rutherford, D. (ed.) 2006. The Cambridge Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sadler, J. E. 1966. J. A. Comenius and the Concept of Universal Education, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sadler, L. V. 1997. ‘Relations between Alchemy and Poetics in the Renaissance and Seventeenth Century, with Special Glances at Donne and Milton’, Ambix 24: 69–76.Google Scholar

Sarasohn, L. T. 1984. ‘A Science Turned Upside Down: Feminism and the Natural Science of Margaret Cavendish’, Huntington Library Quarterly 47: 289–307.Google Scholar

Sarasohn, L. T. 2010. The Natural Philosophy of Margaret Cavendish: Reason and Fancy during the Scientific Revolution, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Sarasohn, L. T. 2014. ‘Fideism, Negative Theology, and Christianity in the Thought of Margaret Cavendish’, in Siegfried, B. R. and Sarasohn, L. T. (eds.), pp. 93–106.Google Scholar

Schliesser, E. 2011. ‘Newton’s Substance Monism, Distant Action, and the Nature of Newton’s Empiricism’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42: 160–66.Google Scholar

Schliesser, E and Smith, G. (forthcoming). ‘Huygens’s 1688 Report to the Directors of the Dutch East India Company on the Measurement of Longitude at Sea and the Evidence It Offered against Universal Gravity’, Archive for the History of the Exact Sciences.Google Scholar

Schmaltz, T. M. 1996. Malebranche’s Theory of the Soul: A Cartesian Interpretation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schurman, A. M. 1639. De Vitae Termino, Leiden.Google Scholar

Schurman, A. M. 1648. Opuscula Hebraea, Graeca, Latina, Gallica: Prosaica adque Metrica, Utrecht: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Schurman, A. M. 1659. The Learned Maid, or, Whether a Maid May be a Scholar? A Logick Exercise, London: John Redmayne.Google Scholar

Schurman, A. M. 1673. Eukleria seu Meliores Partis Electio, Altona.Google Scholar

Seibt, J. 2016. ‘Process Philosophy’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/process-philosophy/.Google Scholar

Shank, J. B. 2008. The Newton Wars and the Beginning of the French Enlightenment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Shapiro, L. (ed.) 2007a. The Correspondence between Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Shapiro, L. (ed.) 2007b. ‘Volume Editor’s Introduction’, in Shapiro, (ed.), pp. 1–60.Google Scholar

Shapiro, L. (ed.) 2008. ‘“Turn My Will in Completely the Opposite Direction”: Radical Doubt and Descartes’s Account of Free Will’, in Hoffman, P., Owen, D., and Yaffe, G. (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell, Peterborough: Broadview, pp. 21–39.Google Scholar

Sheridan, P. 2007. ‘Reflection, Nature, and Moral Law: The Extent of Cockburn’s Lockeanism in her Defence of Mr. Locke’s Essay’, Hypatia 22: 133–51.Google Scholar

Siegfried, B. R. and Sarasohn, L. T. 2014. God and Nature in the Thought of Margaret Cavendish, Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. 1969. ‘Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas’, History and Theory 8: 3–53.Google Scholar

Sleigh, R. C. 2005. ‘Reflections on the Masham–Leibniz Correspondence’, in Mercer, C. and O’Neill, E. (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter, and Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sowaal, A. 2007. ‘Mary Astell’s Serious Proposal: Mind, Method, and Custom’, Philosophy Compass 2: 227–43.Google Scholar

Sowaal, A. 2009. ‘Mary Astell’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/astell/.Google Scholar

Sowaal, A. 2005. Mary Astell: Theorist of Freedom from Domination, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Spinoza, B. 2002a. Ethics, in Spinoza: Complete Works, trans. and eds. Shirley, S. and Morgan, M., Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, pp. 213–382.Google Scholar

Spinoza, B. 2002b. Short Treatise on God, Man, and His Well-Being, in Spinoza: Complete Works, trans. and eds. Shirley, S. and Morgan, M., Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, pp. 31–107.Google Scholar

Spinoza, B. 2002c. Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect, in Spinoza: Complete Works, trans. and eds. Shirley, S. and Morgan, M., Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar

Spencer, B. 1659. Chrysomeson, a Golden Meane, or, A Middle Way for Christians to Walk by Wherein all Seekers of Truth and Shakers in the Faith May Find the True Religion Independing upon Mans Invention, and be Established Therein, London.Google Scholar

Springborg, P. 1998. ‘Astell, Masham, and Locke: Religion and Politics’, in Smith, H. L. and Pateman, C. (eds.), Women Writers and the Early Modern British Political Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–25.Google Scholar

Springborg, P. 2005. Mary Astell: Theorist of Freedom from Domination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stan, M. 2015. ‘Kant and the Object of Determinate Experience’, Philosopher’s Imprint 15: 1–19.Google Scholar

Stan, M. 2016. ‘Rationalist Foundations and the Science of Force’, in Look, B. and Beiser, F. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stanley, T. 1662. The History of the Chaldaick Philosophy, London: Thomas Dring.Google Scholar

Stein, H. 2002. ‘Newton’s Metaphysics’, in Cohen, I. B. and Smith, G. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 256–307.Google Scholar

Steinle, F. 1995. ‘The Amalgamation of a Concept: Laws of Nature in the New Sciences’, in Weinert, F. (ed.), Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 316–60.Google Scholar

Strien, M.. 2014. ‘On the Origins and Foundations of Laplacian Determinism’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 45: 24–31.Google Scholar

Suárez, F. 1982. Suárez on Individuation, tr. Gracia, J. J. E., Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar

Sutton, G. 1997. Science for a Polite Society: Gender, Culture and the Demonstration of Enlightenment, Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Swartz, N. 1995. ‘A Neo-Humean Perspective: Laws as Regularities’, in Weinert, F. (ed.), Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 67–91.Google Scholar

Swinburne, R. 1984. Personal Identity, Basil Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar

Sydenham, T. 1848–50. ‘On Dropsy’, in The Works of Thomas Sydenham, trans. and ed. Latham, R. G., 2 vols., London: The Sydenham Society.Google Scholar

Teague, F. 1993. ‘The Identity of Bathsua Makin’, Biography 16: 1–17.Google Scholar

Teague, F. 1996. ‘Judith Shakespeare Reading’, Shakespeare Quarterly 47: 361–73.Google Scholar

Teague, F. 1998. Bathsua Makin, Woman of Learning, Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar

Thiel, U. 2011. The Early Modern Subject: Self-Consciousness and Personal Identity from Descartes to Hume, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, E. 2013. ‘Catharine Cockburn on Substantival Space’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 30: 195–214.Google Scholar

Thomas, E. 2017. ‘Time, Space, and Process in Anne Conway’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25: 990–1010.Google Scholar

Tollefsen, D. 1999. ‘Princess Elisabeth and the Problem of Mind–Body Interaction’, Hypatia 14: 59–77.Google Scholar

Torshel, S. 1645. The Womans Glorie. A Treatise Asserting the Due Honour of that Sexe, and Directing Wherein that Honour Consists, London: Printed by G. M. for Iohn Bellamie.Google Scholar

Turnbull, G. H. 1947. Hartlib, Dury, and Comenius: Gleanings from Hartlib’s Papers, Liverpool: University Press of Liverpool.Google Scholar

Uzgalis, W. 2014. ‘John Locke’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/locke/.Google Scholar

Vanderjagt, A. and van Berkel, K. (eds.) 2005. The Book of Nature in Antiquity and the Middle Ages, Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar

Waith, E. M. 1949. ‘Some Seventeenth-Century English Books’, Yale University Library Gazette 23: 131–36.Google Scholar

Waithe, M. E. 1989. ‘On Not Teaching the History of Philosophy’, Hypatia 4: 132–38.Google Scholar

Waithe, M. E. (ed.) 1991. A History of Women Philosophers Volume III: Modern Women Philosophers, 1600–1900, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar

Walmsley, J. C., Craig, H. and Burrows, J. 2016. ‘The Authorship of the Remarks upon an Essay of Humane Understanding’, Eighteenth-Century Thought 6: 205–43.Google Scholar

Walters, L. 2009. ‘Gender Subversion in the Science of Margaret Cavendish’, in Mendelsohn, S. H. (ed.), Ashgate Critical Studies on Women Writers in England 1550–1700: Margaret Cavendish, London: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar

Walters, L. 2014. Margaret Cavendish: Gender, Science, and Politics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ward, R. 2000. The Life of Henry More, ed. Hutton, S., Courtney, C., Courtney, M., Crocker, R., and Hall, R., Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Watkins, E. 2013. ‘Introduction’, in Watkins, E. (ed.), The Divine Order, the Human Order, and the Order of Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. xvii–xxviii.Google Scholar

Webster, C. (ed.) 1970. Samuel Hartlib and the Advancement of Learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Weekes, S. 2007. ‘Francis Bacon and the Art–Nature Distinction’, Ambix 54: 117–45.Google Scholar

Weemes, J. 1632. Portraiture of the Image of God in Man, London: Printed for T. C. by John Bellamie.Google Scholar

Weinert, F. 1995. ‘Laws of Nature – Laws of Science’, in Weinert, F. (ed.), Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 3–66.Google Scholar

White, C. 2008. The Legacy of Anne Conway. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Wilkins, E. 2014. ‘Margaret Cavendish and the Royal Society’, Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science 68: 245–60.Google Scholar

Williams, B. 1978. Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Wilson, A. and Ashplant, T. G. 1988. ‘Whig-History and Present-Centered History’, The Historical Journal 31: 1–16.Google Scholar

Wilson, C. 2004. ‘Love of God and Love of Creatures: The Masham–Astell Debate’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 21: 281–98.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. D. 1978. Descartes, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Witt, C. and Shapiro, L. 2017. ‘Feminist History of Philosophy’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/feminism-femhist/.Google Scholar

Zilsel, E. 1942. ‘The Genesis of the Concept of Physical Law’, The Philosophical Review 3: 245–79.Google Scholar

Zinsser, J. (ed.) 2009. Émilie Du Châtelet: Selected Philosophical Writings, trans. Bour, I. and Zinsser, J., Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar