Agnew, J. and Oslender, U. (2013). Overlapping territories, sovereignty in dispute. In Nicholl, W. and Miller, B. (eds.), Spaces of Contention: Spatialities and Social Movements. London: Ashgate, pp. 121–40.Google Scholar

Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Baviskar, A. (2007). Waterscapes: The Cultural Politics of a Natural Resource. Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar

Bebbington, A., Humphreys-Bebbington, D. and Bury, J. (2010). Federating and defending: Water, territory and extraction in the Andes. In Boelens, R., Getches, D. and Guevara-Gil, (eds.), Out of the Mainstream: Water Rights, Politics and Identity. London: Earthscan, pp. 307–27.Google Scholar

Boelens, R. (2014). Cultural politics and the hydrosocial cycle: Water, power and identity in the Andean highlands. Geoforum, 57, 234–47.Google Scholar

Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J. and Baud, M. (2015). Water reform governmentality in Ecuador: Neoliberalism, centralization and the restraining of polycentric authority and community rule-making. Geoforum, 64, 281–91.Google Scholar

Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., Swyngedouw, J., Vos, E., J. and Wester, P. (2016). Hydrosocial territories: A political ecology perspective. Water International, 41(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Bridge, G. and Perreault, T. (2009). Environmental governance. In Castree, N., Demeritt, D., Liverman, D., and Rhoads, B. (eds.), Companion to Environmental Geography. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 399–475.Google Scholar

Duarte-Abadía, B. and Boelens, R. (2016). Disputes over territorial boundaries and diverging valuation languages: The Santurban hydrosocial highlands territory in Colombia. Water International, 41(1), 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, J. (2005). Seeing like an oil company. American Anthropologist, 107(3), 377–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, J. and Gupta, A. (2002). Spatializing states: Toward an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality. American Ethnologist, 29(4), 981–1002.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Harris, L. M. and Alatout, S. (2010). Negotiating hydro-scales, forging states: Comparison of the upper Tigris/Euphrates and Jordan River basins. Political Geography, 29, 148–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hommes, L. and Boelens, R. (2017). Urbanizing rural waters: Rural-urban water transfers and the reconfiguration of hydrosocial territories in Lima. Political Geography, 57, 71–80.Google Scholar

Hommes, L., Boelens, R. and Maat, H. (2016). Contested hydrosocial territories and disputed water governance: Struggles and competing claims over the Ilisu Dam development in southeastern Turkey. Geoforum, 71, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoogesteger, J., Boelens, R. and Baud, M. (2016). Territorial pluralism: Water users’ multi-scalar struggles against state ordering in Ecuador’s highlands. Water International, 41(1), 91–106.Google Scholar

Kaika, M. (2006). Dams as symbols of modernization: The urbanization of nature between geographical imagination and materiality. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(2), 276–30.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1994). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Li, T. (2011). Rendering society technical: Government through community and the ethnographic turn at the World Bank in Indonesia. In Mosse, D. (ed.), Adventures in Aidland. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar

Linton, J. and Budds, J. (2014). The hydrosocial cycle: Defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water. Geoforum, 54, 170–80.Google Scholar

Lynch, B. D. (2012). Vulnerabilities, competition and rights in a context of climate change toward equitable water governance in Peru’s Rio Santa Valley. Global Environmental Change, 22, 364–73.Google Scholar

Marston, S. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), 219–42.Google Scholar

Meehan, K. (2013). Disciplining de facto development: Water theft and hydrosocial order in Tijuana. Environment and Planning, 31, 319–36.Google Scholar

Molle, F. (2004). Defining water rights: By prescription or negotiation? Water Policy, 6, 207–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nixon, R. (2010). Unimagined communities: Developmental refugees, megadams and monumental modernity. New Formations, 69, 62–80.Google Scholar

Oberborbeck Andersen, A. (2016). Infrastructures of progress and dispossession: Collective responses to shrinking water access among farmers in Arequipa, Peru. Focaal, 74, 28–41.Google Scholar

Obertreis, J., Moss, T., Mollinga, P. and Bichsel, C. (2016). Water, infrastructure and political rule: Introduction to the Special Issue. Water Alternatives, 9(2), 168–81.Google Scholar

Paerregaard, K., Bredholt Stensrud, A. and Oberborbeck Andersen, A. (2016). Water citizenship: Negotiating water rights and contesting water culture in the Peruvian Andes. Latin American Research Review, 51(1), 198–217.Google Scholar

Perreault, T. (2014). What kind of governance for what kind of equity? Towards a theorization of justice in water governance. Water International, 39(2), 233–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perreault, T., Wraight, S. and Perreault, M. (2011). “The social life of water: Histories and geographies of environmental injustice in the Onondaga Lake watershed,” www.justiciahidrica.org.Google Scholar

Rodriguez-de-Francisco, J. C. and Boelens, R. (2016). PES hydrosocial territories: De-territorialization and re-patterning of water control arenas in the Andean highlands. Water International, 41(1), 140–56.Google Scholar

Romano, S. (2017). Building capacities for sustainable water governance at the grassroots: “Organic empowerment” and its policy implications in Nicaragua. Society & Natural Resources, DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2016.1273413.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Ballesteros, E. and Gálvez-García, C. (2014). Community, common-pool resources and socio-ecological systems: Water management and community building in southern Spain. Human Ecology, 42, 847–56.Google Scholar

Scott, J. (1998). Seeing Like a State. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, N. (1984). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Excluding the other: The production of scale and scaled politics. In Lee, R. and Wills, J. (eds.), Geographies of Economies. London: Arnold, pp.167–76.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Globalisation or “glocalisation”? Networks, territories and rescaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(1), 25–48.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Technonatural revolutions: The scalar politics of Franco’s hydro-social dream for Spain, 1939–1975. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 9–28.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The political economy and political ecology of the hydrosocial cycle. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 142, 56–60.Google Scholar

Valladares, C. and Boelens, R. (2017). Extractivism and the rights of nature: Governmentality, “convenient communities” and epistemic pacts in Ecuador. Environmental Politics, 26(6), 1015–34.Google Scholar

Van Teijlingen, K. van (2017). Large-scale mining and territorial pluralism: Mapping conflicts and convergence in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Revista de Estudios Atacameños.Google Scholar

Vos, J. and Hinojosa, L. (2016). Virtual water trade and the contestation of hydrosocial territories. Water International, 41(1), 37–53.Google Scholar

Winner, L. (1986). Do artifacts have politics? In Winner, L. (ed.), The Whale and the Reactor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Zwarteveen, M. and Boelens, R. (2014). Defining, researching and struggling for water justice: Some conceptual building blocks for research and action. Water International, 39(2), 143–58.Google Scholar

Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.Google Scholar

Ayala-Carcedo, F. J. and Driever, S. L. (eds.) (1998). Lucas Mallada – La Futura Revolución Española y otros Escritos Regeneracionistas. Madrid: Editorial Bibliotheca Nueva.Google Scholar

Baletti, B. (2012). Ordenamento territorial: Neo-developmentalism and the struggle for territory in the lower Brazilian Amazon. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), 573–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, J. and Alatout, S. (2012). Water worlds. Social Studies of Science, 42(4), 483–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boelens, R. (2014). Cultural politics and the hydrosocial cycle: Water, power and identity in the Andean highlands. Geoforum, 57, 234–47.Google Scholar

Boelens, R. (2015). Water, Power and Identity: The Cultural Politics of Water in the Andes. London: Earthscan, Routledge.Google Scholar

Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., Swyngedouw, E., Vos, J. and Wester, P. (2016). Hydrosocial territories: A political ecology perspective. Water International, 41(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Boelens, R. and Post Uiterweer, N. C. (2013). Hydraulic heroes: The ironies of utopian hydraulism and its politics of autonomy in the Guadalhorce Valley, Spain. Journal of Historical Geography, 41, 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, N. (1998). Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D, 16, 459–81.Google Scholar

Bridge, G. and Perreault, T. (2009). Environmental governance. In Castree, N, D. Demeritt, D. Liverman, and B. Rhoads (eds.), Companion to Environmental Geography. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 475–497.Google Scholar

Carroll, P. (2012). Water and technoscientific state formation in California. Social Studies of Science, 42(4), 489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, J. (1911). Política Hidráulica (Misión Social de los Riegos en España). Madrid: Biblioteca J. Costa.Google Scholar

Costa, J. (1981(1900)). Reconstitución y Europeización de España. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios de Administración Local.Google Scholar

Costa, J. (1998(1901)). Oligarquía y Caciquismo. Madrid: Editorial Biblioteca Nueva.Google Scholar

Cuerpo de Ingenieros. (1899). Pantanos y Canales de Riego. Revista de Obras Publicas, 46, 1229.Google Scholar

Duarte-Abadía, B. and Boelens, R. (2016). Disputes over territorial boundaries and diverging valuation languages: The Santurban hydrosocial highlands territory in Colombia. Water International, 41(1), 15–36.Google Scholar

Duarte-Abadía, B., Boelens, R. and Roa-Avendaño, T. (2015). Hydropower, encroachment and the repatterning of hydrosocial territory: The case of Hidrosogamoso in Colombia. Human Organization, 74(3), 243–54.Google Scholar

Elden, S. (2010). Land, terrain, territory. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 799–817.Google Scholar

Estevan, A. (2008). Herencias y problemas de la política hidráulica española. Bilbao: Bakeaz/Fundación Nueva Cultura del Agua.Google Scholar

Ferguson, J. and Gupta, A. (2002). Spatializing state: Toward an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality. American Ethnologist, 29(4), 981–1002.Google Scholar

Forsyth, T. (2003). Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Sciences. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1978, Gordon, C., ed. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1991[1978]). Governmentality. In Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar

Foucault, M., Sellenart, M. and Burchell, G. (2007). Security, Territory, Population. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Franco, F. B. (1959a). Speech of chief of state in Medina del Campo, Diario ABC, nr. 16734, October 30, 1959.Google Scholar

Franco, F. B. (1959b) Discourse of the head of state. Diario ABC, November 3, 1959.Google Scholar

Gil Olcina, A. (1995) Conflictos autonómicos sobre trasvases de agua en España. Investigaciones Geográficas, 13, 17–28.Google Scholar

Gil Olcina, A. (2001). Del plan general de 1902 a la planificación hidrológica. Investigaciones Geográficas, 25, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gómez de Pablos-González, M. (1972). El Centro de Estudios Hidrográficos y la Planificación Hidráulica Española. Revista de Obras Públicas, 120, 3096.Google Scholar

Gómez-Mendoza, J. (1992). Regeneracionismo y regadíos. In Gil Olcina, A. and Morales Gil, A. (eds.), Hitos Históricos de los Regadíos Españoles. Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación.Google Scholar

Gómez-Mendoza, J. and Ortega-Cantero, N. (1987). Geografía y regeneracionismo en España. Sistema, 77, 77–89.Google Scholar

Harris, L. (2009). States at the limit: Tracing contemporary state–society relations in the Borderlands of Southeastern Turkey. European Journal of Turkish Studies, 10, 2–19.Google Scholar

Hernández, J. M. (1994). La planificación hidrológica en España. Revista de Estudios Agro-Sociales 167, 13–25.Google Scholar

Heynen, N. and Swyngedouw, E. (2003). Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode, 34 (4), 898–918.Google Scholar

Hommes, L. and Boelens, R. (2017). Urbanizing rural waters: Rural-urban water transfers and the reconfiguration of hydrosocial territories in Lima. Political Geography, 57, 71–80.Google Scholar

Hommes, L., Boelens, R. and Maat, H. (2016). Contested hydrosocial territories and disputed water governance: Struggles and competing claims over the Ilisu Dam development in southeastern Turkey. Geoforum, 71, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoogesteger, J. and Verzijl, A. (2015). Grassroots scalar politics: Insights from peasant water struggles in the Ecuadorian and Peruvian Andes. Geoforum, 62, 13–23.Google Scholar

Hoogesteger, J., Boelens, R. and Baud, M. (2016). Territorial pluralism: Water users’ multi-scalar struggles against state ordering in Ecuador’s highlands. Water International, 41(1), 91–106.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. and Brian, W. (1998). Science and decision making. In Rayner, S. and Malone, E. L. (eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press, pp. 1–87.Google Scholar

Kaika, M. (2005). City of Flows: Modernity, Nature and the City. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kaika, M. (2006). Dams as symbols of modernization: The urbanization of nature between geographical imagination and materiality. Annals Association of American Geographers, 96(2), 276–301.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Linton, J. and Budds, J. (2014). The hydro-social cycle: Defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water. Geoforum, 57, 170–80.Google Scholar

Llamas Madurga, M. R. (1984). Política hidráulica y genesis de mitos hidráulicos en España. Cimbra, 218, 16–25.Google Scholar

Llamas Madurga, M. R. (1996). El Agua en España: Problemas Principales y Posibles Soluciones. Madrid: Real Academia de Ciencias. Instituto de Ecología y Mercado.Google Scholar

Lopez-Gunn, E. (2009). Agua para todos: A new regionalist hydraulic paradigm in Spain. Water Alternatives, 2/3, 370–94.Google Scholar

Lorenzo Pardo, M. (1930). La Confederación del Ebro: Nueva Política Hidráulica. Madrid: Compañía Ibero-Americana de Publicaciones.Google Scholar

Lorenzo Pardo, M. (1931). La Conquista del Ebro. Zaragoza: Editorial Heraldo de Aragón.Google Scholar

Macías-Picavea, R. (1896). La Tierra de los Campos. Madrid: Suárez.Google Scholar

Macías-Picavea, R. (1977 (1899)). El Problema Nacional. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios de Administración Local.Google Scholar

Mallada, L. (1890). Los Males de la Patria y la Futura Revolución Española. Madrid: Fundación Banco Exterior.Google Scholar

Maeztu, R. de (1997 (1899)). Hacia otra España. Madrid: Editorial Biblioteca NuevaGoogle Scholar

Martín Gaite, C. (2003). El Conde del Guadalhorce. Su Epoca y su Labor. Madrid: Tabla Rasa.Google Scholar

Maurice, J. and Serrano, C. (1977). J. Costa: Crisis de la Restauración y Populismo (1875–1911). Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar

Mosse, D. (2008). Epilogue: The cultural politics of water. Journal of Southern African Studies, 34(4), 939–48.Google Scholar

Ortega Cantero, N. (1975). Política Agraria y Dominación del Espacio – Orígenes, Caracterización y Resultados de la Política de Colonización planteada en la España posterior a la Guerra Civil. Madrid: Editorial Ayuso.Google Scholar

Ortega Cantero, N. (1995). El Plan general de Canales de Riego y Pantanos de 1902. In Gil Olcina, A. and Morales-Gil, A. (eds.), Planificación Hidráulica en España. Murcia: Fundación Caja del Mediterráneo, pp. 107–36.Google Scholar

Ortí, Alfonso (1984). Política hidráulica y cuestión social: Orígenes, etapas y significados del Regeneracionismo Hidráulico de Joaquín Costa. Revista Agricultura y Sociedad, 32, 11–107.Google Scholar

Perreault, T. (2014). What kind of governance for what kind of equity? Towards a theorization of justice in water governance. Water International, 39(2), 233–45.Google Scholar

Perreault, T., Bridge, G. and McCarthy, J. (eds.) (2015). The Handbook of Political Ecology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Río Cisneros, A. del (1964). Pensamiento Político de Franco – Antología. Madrid: Servicio Informativo Español.Google Scholar

Rodríguez-de-Francisco, J. C. and Boelens, R. (2016). PES hydrosocial territories: De-territorialization and re-patterning of water control arenas in the Andean highlands. Water International, 41(1), 140–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sauri, D. and del Moral, L. (2001). Recent developments in Spanish water policy: Alternatives and conflicts at the end of the hydraulic age. Geoforum 32, 351–62Google Scholar

Seemann, M. (2016). Inclusive recognition politics and the struggle over hydrosocial territories in two Bolivian highland communities. Water International, 41(1), 157–72.Google Scholar

Smith, N. (1984). Uneven Development. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (1999). Modernity and hybridity: Nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 89(3), 443–65.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Globalisation or “glocalisation”? Networks, territories and rescaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(1), 25–48.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Technonatural revolutions: The scalar politics of Franco’s hydro-social dream for Spain, 1939–1975. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 9–28.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The political economy and political ecology of the hydrosocial cycle. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 142, 56–60.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (2014). “Not a drop of water …”: State, modernity and the production of nature in Spain, 1898–2010. Environment and History, 20(1), 67–92.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (2015). Liquid Power: Contested Hydro-Modernities in 20th Century Spain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. and Williams, J. (2016). From Spain’s hydro-deadlock to the desalination fix. Water International, 41(1), 54–73.Google Scholar

Vallarino Canovas del Castillo, E. (1992). Política hidráulica. Revista de Obras Publicas, 139, 3310.Google Scholar

Vos, J. and Hinojosa, L. (2016). Virtual water trade and the contestation of hydrosocial territories. Water International, 41(1), 37–53.Google Scholar

Zwarteveen, M. and Boelens, R. (2014). Defining, researching and struggling for water justice: Some conceptual building blocks for research and action. Water International, 39(2), 143–58.Google Scholar

Abers, R. N. and Keck, M. E. (2013). Practical Authority: Agency and Institutional Change in Brazilian Water Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Asocaña. (2016). Aspectos generales del sector azucarero colombiano 2015–2016. Annual Report, www.asocana.org/modules/documentos/11992.aspx.Google Scholar

Begg, C., Walker, G. and Kuhlicke, C. (2015). Localism and flood risk management in England: The creation of new inequalities? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 33(4), 685–702.Google Scholar

Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica (CNMH). (2014). Patrones y campesinos: tierra, poder y violencia en el Valle del Cauca (1960–2012). Bogotá: CNMH.Google Scholar

Campos, A., Holm-Nielsen, N., Díaz, C., Rubiano, D., Costa, C., Ramírez, F., and Dickson, E. (2012). Análisis de la gestión del riesgo de desastres en Colombia: un aporte para la construcción de políticas públicas. Bogotá: World Bank.Google Scholar

Corporación Autónoma Regional del Valle del Cauca (CVC). (2004). Génesis y Desarrollo de una visión de progreso, CVC cincuenta años. Cali: CVC.Google Scholar

CVC. (2014). Análisis de las jornadas de trabajo participativo con el sector azucarero (Asocaña-Procaña). Análisis de medidas preliminares propuestas. Cauca River Corridor Project internal report.Google Scholar

CVC. (2015). La protección contra inundaciones en el Valle Alto del Río Cauca. Nuevo Paradigma Corredor de conservación y uso sostenible del sistema Río Cauca, www.cvc.gov.co/images/CVC/microsite/corredor_rio_cauca/documentos/gobernanza/seminario_taller_rio_cauca/20150907_Proyectopercent20Corredor_Mariapercent20Cpercent20Sandoval.pdf.Google Scholar

CVC. (2016). “Agua en el Valle del Cauca. El Aporte Técnico a las Soluciones.” Powerpoint presentation by Ruben Darío Materón Muñoz, Director General CVC, www.infraestructura.org.co/filef.php?IDe=2237.Google Scholar

Corporación Autónoma Regional del Valle del Cauca (CVC) and Universidad del Valle (Univalle). (2007). El Río Cauca en su Valle Alto: Un aporte al conocimiento de uno de los ríos más importantes de Colombia. Cali: CVC, Universidad del Valle.Google Scholar

Currie, L. (1951). Bases de un programa de Fomento para Colombia. Mission Report, 2nd edn. Bogotá: Banco de la República.Google Scholar

De Bruijn, H., de Bruijne, M. and ten Heuvelhof, E. (2015). The politics of resilience in the Dutch “Room for the River” project. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 659–68.Google Scholar

Deeming, H., Whittle, R. and Medd, W. (2012). Investigating resilience, through “before and after” perspectives on residual risk. In Bennett, S. (ed.), Innovative Thinking in Risk, Crisis and Disaster Management. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 173–200.Google Scholar

Departamento Administrativo de Planeación. (2015). Anuario Estadístico del Valle del Cauca. Cali: Gobernación del Valle del Cauca, http://anuarioestadisticovalle.comli.com/#!/page_Home.Google Scholar

Edelenbos, J., Van Buuren, A., Roth, D. and Winnubst, M. (2017). Stakeholder initiatives in flood-risk management: Exploring the role and impact of bottom-up initiatives in three “Room for the River” projects in the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(1), 47–66.Google Scholar

Ekbladh, D. (2002). “Mr. TVA”: Grass-roots development, david lilienthal, and the rise and fall of the Tennessee Valley Authority as a symbol for U.S. overseas development, 1933–1973. Diplomatic History, 26(3), 335–74.Google Scholar

Guzmán-Barney, A. and Rodríguez-Pizarro, A. N. (2015). Orden social y conflicto armado: El Norte del Cauca 1990–2010. Cali: Programa Editorial Universidad del Valle.Google Scholar

Materón-Muñoz, R. D. (2016). “Comunicado a la opinión pública: La situación de los embalses en el Valle.” June 2, 2016, www.cvc.gov.co/index.php/carousel/2319-comunicado-a-la-opinion-publica-2.Google Scholar

Martinez-Alier, J. (2002). The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar

Perez, W. and Eliecer, J. (2016). “Comunicado conjunto suscrito por los alcaldes de los municipios de Andalucía y Bugalagrande.” Letter to CVC, April 20, 2016, http://andalucia-valle.gov.co/apc-aa-files/39353635313532356464353264386533/comunicadoconjuntosuscritoporlosalcaldesdeandaluciaybugalagrande.pdf.Google Scholar

Rodriguez de Francisco, J. C. and Boelens, R. (2015). Payment for environmental services: Mobilising an epistemic community to construct dominant policy. Environmental Politics, 24, 481–500.Google Scholar

Roth, D. and Warner, J. (2007). Flood risk, uncertainty and changing river protection policy in the Netherlands: The case of “calamity polders.” Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(4), 519–525.Google Scholar

Sánchez-Triana, E. and Ortolano, L. (2001). Organizational learning and environmental impact assessment at Colombia’s Cauca Valley Corporation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21(3), 223–39.Google Scholar

Sandoval, M. C. (2012). La protección contra inundaciones en el Valle del Cauca: Historia y Nuevo Paradigma. Cali: CVC.Google Scholar

Sundberg, J. (2012). Negotiating citizenship in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. In A. Latta and H. Wittman (eds.), Environmental and Citizenship in Latin America: Natures, Subjects, and Struggles. CEDLA Latin America Studies 101. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 97–111.Google Scholar

Tobasura, I. (2006). La Laguna de SonsoValle del Cauca, Colombia: Más de tres décadas de lucha ambiental. Un caso de historia ambiental. Gestión y Ambiente, 9(2), 13–26.Google Scholar

Univalle (Universidad del Valle). (2011). Valoración económica de la infraestructura existente para el control de inundaciones y estimación de los costos de las inundaciones 2010–2011 en el Corredor de Conservación del Río Cauca. Partnership agreement CVC-Univalle-Asocars.Google Scholar

Univalle. (2014). Planteamiento de alternativas estructurales para la gestión de inundaciones en el Valle Alto del Río Cauca. Partnership Agreement No.001 of 2013 ASOCARS – Universidad del Valle. Escuela de Ingeniería de Recursos Naturales y del Ambiente, grupo de investigación en hidráulica fluvial y marítima.Google Scholar

Van Buuren, A., Vink, M. and Warner, J. (2016). Constructing authoritative answers to a latent crisis? Strategies of puzzling, powering and framing in Dutch climate adaptation practices compared. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(1), 70–87.Google Scholar

Vejarano-Alvarez, P. and Saavedra-Rodríguez, C. A. (2013). Diagnóstico ambiental y de las inundaciones del 2010–2011 sobre los ecosistemas del Corredor de conservación y uso sostenible del valle alto del Río Cauca en el Valle del Cauca: un análisis con miras a la conservación y la restauración ecológica. Internal report Partnership agreement CVC-Asocars.Google Scholar

Vörösmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P., Gessner, M., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., Glidden, S., Bunn, S., Sullivan, C., Liermann, C., and Davies, P. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467, 555–61.Google Scholar

Warner, J. and Buuren, Van, A. (2011). Implementing room for the river: Narratives of success and failure in Kampen, the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(4): 779–801.Google Scholar

Warner, J., van Buuren, A. and Edelenbos, J. (eds.) (2013). Making Space for the River: Governance Experiences with Multifunctional River Flood Management in the US and Europe. London: IWA Publishing.Google Scholar

Wolsink, M. (2005). River basin approach and integrated water management: Governance pitfalls for the Dutch Space-Water-Adjustment Management Principle. Geoforum, 37, 473–87.Google Scholar

Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.Google Scholar

Ahunbay, Z. and Balkiz, Ö. (2009). Outstanding universal value of Hasankeyf and the Tigris Valley, Dog˘a Derneg˘i, Ankara (leaflet).Google Scholar

Assies, W. (2010). The limits of state reform and multiculturalism in Latin America: Contemporary illustrations. In R. Boelens, D. Getches, and A. Guevara-gil (eds.) Out of the Mainstream. Water Rights, Politics and Identity. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Bagis, A. I. (1997). Turkey’s hydropolitics of the Euphrates-Tigris Basin. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 13(4), 567–82.Google Scholar

Baletti, B. (2012). Ordenamento territorial: Neo-developmentalism and the struggle for territory in the lower Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39, 573–98.Google Scholar

BanCo2. (2016). “Servicios Ambientales Comunitarios,” www.banco2.com/v2/index.php.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. and Alatout, S. (2012). Water worlds: Introduction to the special issue of Social Studies of Science. Social Studies of Science, 42(4), 483–88.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Baviskar, A. (2007). Waterscapes: The Cultural Politics of a Natural Resource. Ranikhet: Permanent Black.Google Scholar

Boelens, R. (2014). Cultural politics and the hydrosocial cycle: Water, power and identity in the Andean highlands. Geoforum, 234–47.Google Scholar

Boelens, R. (2015a). Water, Power and Identity: The Cultural Politics of Water in the Andes. London: Earthscan, Routledge.Google Scholar

Boelens, R. (2015b). Water Justice in Latin America: The Politics of Difference, Equality and Indifference. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., Swyngedouw, E., Vos, J. and Wester, P. (2016). Hydrosocial territories: A political ecology perspective. Water International, 41(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Brighenti, A. M. (2010). On territorology: Towards a general science of territory. Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budds, J. and Hinojosa-Valencia, L. (2012). Restructuring and rescaling water governance in mining contexts: The co-production of waterscapes in Peru. Water Alternatives, 5, 119–37.Google Scholar

Buitrago, E. (2012). Entre el Agua y el Oro: Tensiones y Reconfiguraciones Territoriales en el Municipio de Vetas. Santander, Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar

Cadman, L. (2010). How (not) to be governed: Foucault, critique, and the political. Environment and Planning D, 28(3), 539–56.Google Scholar

Çarkoglu, A. and Eder, M. (2001). Domestic concerns and the water conflict over the Euphrates–Tigris River Basin. Middle Eastern Studies, 37(1), 41–71.Google Scholar

Comisión Estatal del Agua de Guanajuato (CEAG). (2001). Actualización de los Balances de los Estudios Hidrológicos y Modelos Matemáticos de los Acuíferos del Estado de Guanajuato. Mexico: Guanajuato City.Google Scholar

CEAG. (2006). Memoria Institucional 2000–2006 de la Comisión Estatal del Agua de Guanajuato (CEAG). Guanajuato City: CEAG.Google Scholar

CEAG. (2010). “Planes de manejo de acuíferos,” www.guanajuato.gob.mx/ceag/planes.Google Scholar

CEASG. (1999). Plan Estatal Hidráulico de Guanajuato 2000–2025, Fase 1: Diagnóstico base de la situación hidráulica del Estado de Guanajuato. Guanajuato City: CEASG.Google Scholar

Comisión Nacional del Agua (CNA). (2016). El Registro Público de Derechos de Agua (REPDA).Google Scholar

Damocracy. (2016). “Damocracy: Global campaign to protect rivers from destructive dams,” www.damocracy.org/about/.Google Scholar

DSI and Ilisu Consortium. (2005). Ilisu Dam and HEPP Project Update of Resettlement Action Plan – Final Report. Ankara: Environmental Consultancy Co.Google Scholar

Duarte-Abadía, B. and Boelens, R. (2016). Disputes over territorial boundaries and diverging valuation languages: Santurban hydro-social highlands territory in Colombia. Water International, 41, 15–36.Google Scholar

Eberlein, C., Drillisch, H., Ayboga, E. and Wenidoppler, T. (2010). The Ilisu Dam in Turkey and the role of export credit agencies and NGO networks. Water Alternatives, 3(2), 291–312.Google Scholar

Eichelmann, U. (2009). Stop Ilisu – Controversial Project on the Tigris River. Vienna: ECA Watch Austria.Google Scholar

Elden, S. (2010). Land, terrain, territory. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 799–817.Google Scholar

Escobar, A. (2001). Culture sits in places: Reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization. Political Geography, 20, 139–74.Google Scholar

Evren, E. (2014). The rise and decline of an anti-dam campaign: Yusufeli Dam project and the temporal politics of development. Water History, 6, 405–19.Google Scholar

Fletcher, R. (2010). Neoliberal environmentality: Towards a poststructuralist political ecology of the conservation debate. Conservation & Society, 8, 171–81.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Franco, B. M. (2013). “Characterization and analysis of production systems in Guerrero, Rabanal and Santurban páramos: ‘Páramos and life system project’.” Alexander von Humboldt Institute, Bogotá. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Fraser, N. (2000) Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3,107–20.Google Scholar

GAP Regional Development Administration. (2013). About GAP, www.gap.gov.tr/english.Google Scholar

GAP Regional Development Administration. (2013). About GAP: Objectives, www.gap.gov.tr/aboutgap/objectives-of-gap.Google Scholar

Garay, L. (2013). Globalización/ Glocalización soberanía y gobernanza. A propósito del cambio climático y extractivismo minero. In V. Saldarriaga, O. Alarcon, and R. Medina (eds.), Minería en Colombia: Fundamentos Para Superar el Modelo Extractivista. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional, pp. 9–19.Google Scholar

Gevaert, A. I., Hoogesteger, J. and Stoof, C. R. (2012). Suitability of Using Groundwater Temperature and Geology to Predict Arsenic Contamination in Drinking Water: A Case Study in Central Mexico. Internet-First University Press.Google Scholar

Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (1992). Beyond “culture”: Space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cultural Anthropology, 7(1), 6–23.Google Scholar

Häkli, J. (2009). Governmentality. In R. Thrift, K. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Hale, C. R. (2002). Does multiculturalism menace? Governance, cultural rights and the politics of identity in Guatemala. Journal of Latin America Studies, 34(3), 485–524.Google Scholar

Harris, L. M. (2009). States at the limit: Tracing contemporary state-society relations in the Borderlands of Southeastern Turkey. European Journal of Turkish Studies, 10, 2–19.Google Scholar

Hommes, L., Boelens, R. and Maat, H. (2016). Contested hydrosocial territories and disputed water governance: Struggles and competing claims over the Ilisu Dam development in southeastern Turkey. Geoforum, 71, 9–20.Google Scholar

Hoogesteger, J. and Wester, P. (2015). Intensive groundwater use and (in)equity: Processes and governance challenges. Environmental Science and Policy, 51, 117–24.Google Scholar

Hoogesteger, J. and Wester, P. (2017). Regulating groundwater use: The challenges of policy implementation in Guanajuato, Central Mexico. Environmental Science and Policy, 77, 107–13.Google Scholar

Hoogesteger, J., Boelens, R. and Baud, M. (2016). Territorial pluralism: Water users’ multi-scalar struggles against state ordering in Ecuador’s highlands. Water International, 41, 91–106.Google Scholar

Izady, M. R. (1996). The drowning of the Kurdish historical and artistic heritage. The Kurdish Life, 19.Google Scholar

Jongerden, J. (2010). Dams and politics in Turkey: Utilizing water, developing conflict. Middle East Policy, XVII(1), 137–43.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Linton, J. and Budds, J. (2014). The hydrosocial cycle: Defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water. Geoforum, 57, 170–80.Google Scholar

Martínez-Alier, J. (2004). Los conflictos ecológicos distributivos y los indicadores de sustentabilidad. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, 1, 21–30.Google Scholar

Ministry of Development. (n.d.). Information Booklet. Ankara.Google Scholar

Ministry of Environment (MMA). (2001). Program for the Sustainable Management and Restoration of Colombian High Land Ecosystems: Páramos. Bogotá: General Direction of Ecosystems.Google Scholar

Nixon, R. (2010). Unimagined communities: Developmental refugees, megadams and monumental modernity. New Formations, 69, 62–80.Google Scholar

Ortega-Guerrero, M. A. (2009). Presencia, distribución, hidrogeoquímica y origen de arsénico, fluoruro y otros elementos traza disueltos en agua subterránea, a escala de cuenca hidrológica tributaria de Lerma-Chapala, México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 26(1), 143–61.Google Scholar

Özok-Gündogan, N. (2005). “Social development” as a governmental strategy in the southeastern Anatolia project. New Perspective on Turkey, 32, 93–111.Google Scholar

Perreault, T. (2014). What kind of governance for what kind of equity? Towards a theorization of justice in water governance. Water International, 39(2), 233–45.Google Scholar

Pfaffenberger, B. (1988) Fetishised objects and humanised nature: Towards an anthropology of technology. Man (N.S.), 23, 236–52.Google Scholar

Reis, N. (2014). Coyotes, concessions and construction companies: Illegal water markets and legally constructed water scarcity in central Mexico. Water Alternatives, 7(3), 542–60.Google Scholar

Rodriguez-de-Francisco, J. C. and Boelens, R. (2015). Payment for environmental services: Mobilising an epistemic community to construct dominant policy. Environmental Politics, 24(3), 481–500.Google Scholar

Rodriguez-de-Francisco, J. C. and Boelens, R. (2016). PES hydrosocial territories: De-territorialization and re-patterning of water control arenas in the Andean highlands. Water International, 41(1), 140–56.Google Scholar

Rodriguez-de-Francisco, J. C., Budds, J. and Boelens, R. (2013). Payment for environmental services and unequal resource control in Pimampiro, Ecuador. Society & Natural Resources 26(10), 1217–33.Google Scholar

Ronayne, M. (2005). The cultural and environmental impact of large dams in southeast Turkey, fact-finding mission report. National University of Ireland, Galway and Kurdish Human Rights Project.Google Scholar

Ronayne, M. (2007). The culture of caring and its destruction in the Middle East: Women’s work, water, war and archaeology. In Hamilakis, Y. and Duke, P. (eds.), Archaeology and Capitalism: From Ethics to Politics. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar

Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 517–40.Google Scholar

Setton, D. and Drillisch, H. (2006). Zum Scheitern Verurteilt – Der Ilisu Staudamm im Südosten der Türkei. Berlin: World Economy, Ecology & Development.Google Scholar

Sullivan, S. (2009). Green capitalism, and the cultural poverty of constructing nature as service provider. Radical Anthropology, 3, 18–27.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (1999). Modernity and hybridity: Nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 89, 443–65.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The political economy and political ecology of the hydro-social cycle. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 142, 56–60.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (2015). Liquid Power: Contested Hydro-Modernities in Twentieth Century Spain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Today’s Zaman. (2013). “Hasankeyf locals struck in limbo after Ilisu Dam decision,” www.todayszaman.com/national_hasankeyf-locals-stuck-in-limbo-after-ilisu-dam-decision_304540.html.Google Scholar

Warner, J. (2012). The struggle over Turkey’s Ilısu Dam: Domestic and international security linkages. International Environmental Agreements, 12, 231–50.Google Scholar

Wester, P. and Hoogesteger, J. (2011). Uso intensivo y despojo del agua subterránea: hacia una conceptualización de los conflictos y la concentración del acceso al agua subterránea. In R. Boelens, L. Cremers, and M. Z. Zwarteveen (eds.), Justicia Hídrica: Acumulación, Conflicto y Acción Social. Lima: IEP, pp. 111–33.Google Scholar

Wester, P., Hoogesteger, J. and Vincent, L. (2009). Local IWRM organizations for groundwater regulation: The experiences of the Aquifer Management Councils (COTAS) in Guanajuato, Mexico. Natural Resources Forum, 33(1), 29–38.Google Scholar

Wester, P., Sandoval-Minero, R. and Hoogesteger, J. (2011). Assessment of the development of aquifer management councils (COTAS) for sustainable groundwater management in Guanajuato, Mexico. Hydrogeology Journal, 19(4), 889–99.Google Scholar

Zwarteveen, M. (2015). Regulating water, ordering society: Practices and politics of water governance. Inaugural lecture, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Zwarteveen, M. and Boelens, R. (2014). Defining, researching and struggling for water justice: Some conceptual building blocks for research and action. Water International, 39(2), 143–58.Google Scholar

Albertos, C. (2015). “Guatemala: Chixoy Dam-affected communities: Current status and challenges,” paper presented to the Society for Applied Anthropology Conference, Pittsburgh, March 24–28.Google Scholar

Cohen, R. (2012). The Fish that Ate the Whale: The Life and Times of America’s Banana King. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Commission for Historical Clarification (Comisión para el Esclarecimiento Histórico, CEH). (1999). Memory of Silence: The Guatemalan Truth Commission Report. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Consolidated Appropriations Act. (2014). Public Law No. 113–76. January 17, 2014. Congress. Gov. Guatemala City.Google Scholar

Cullather, N. (2006). Secret History: The CIA’s Classified Account of its Operations in Guatemala, 1952–1954. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Davis, S. (1983). Testimony on the environmental impact of a multilateral development bank-funded project: Hearings before the Subcommittee on International Development Institutions and Finance of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs. House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, first session, Washington, DC, June 28 and 29.Google Scholar

Deardon, N. (2012). “Guatemala’s Chixoy dam: Where development and terror intersect.” The Guardian, December 10, 2012.Google Scholar

Doyle, K. and Kornbluh, P. (1997). CIA and assassinations: The Guatemala 1954 documents. National Security Archive, http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB4/.Google Scholar

Dutch, S. (2009). The largest act of environmental warfare in history. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 15(4), 287–97.Google Scholar

Guatemala Human Rights Center (GHRC). (2016). “Guatemala news update, February 6–12,” Monitoring Guatemala: GHRC’s Human Rights Blog. February 12, 2016.Google Scholar

Gwin, C. (1997). US relations with the World Bank, 1945–1992. In D. Kapur, J. Lewis, and R. Webb (eds.), The World Bank: Its First Half Century, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Inter-American Human Rights Court. (2012). Rio Negro Massacres v. Guatemala, www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_250_ing.pdf.Google Scholar

International Financial Institutions Act (1977) (22 U. S. C. 262(d)), Public Law 95–118, October 3, 1977, www.cfr.org/human-rights/international-financial-institutions-act-1977/p27148.Google Scholar

Johnston, B. (2000). “Reparations and the right to remedy.” Briefing paper prepared for the World Commission on Dams, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTINVRES/214578-1112885441548/20480101/ReparationsandtheRighttoRemedysoc221.pdf.Google Scholar

Johnston, B. (2005). Chixoy Dam Legacy Issues Study, vol. 1: Executive Summary Consequential Damages and Reparation: Recommendations for Remedy; vol. 2: Document Review and Chronology of Relevant Actions and Events; vol. 3: Consequential Damage Assessment of Chixoy River Basin. New York: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Center for Political Ecology.Google Scholar

Johnston, B. (2010). Chixoy dam legacies: The struggle to secure reparation and the right to remedy in Guatemala. Water Alternatives, 3(2), 341–61.Google Scholar

Johnston, B. (ed.) (2011). Life and Death Matters: Human Rights, Environment, and Social Justice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Johnston, B. (2012). Water, culture, power: Hydro-development dynamics. In B. Johnston, , L. Hiwasaki, I. Klaver, A. Ramos-Castillo, and V. Strang (eds.), Water, Cultural Diversity, and Global Environmental Change. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 295–318.Google Scholar

Johnston, B. (2013). Human needs and environmental rights to water: A biocultural systems approach to hydro-development and management. Ecosphere, 4(3), 1–15.Google Scholar

Johnston, B. (2016). Action-research and environmental justice: Lessons from Guatemala’s Chixoy Dam. In Heiss, U., J. Christensen and M. Neimann (eds.), Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Johnston, B. and Fiske, S. (2014). The precarious state of the hydrosphere. WIREs Water 1, 1–9.Google Scholar

Manz, B. (2005). Paradise in Ashes: A Guatemalan Journey of Courage, Terror, and Hope. Vol. 8. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

McAllister, D. E., Craig, J. F., Davidson, N., Delany, S. and Seddon, M. (2001). Biodiversity impacts of large dams. World Commission on Dams Background paper, 1. New York: IUCN.Google Scholar

Museo Comunitario Rabinal Achi. (2003). Oj K’aslik, Estamos Vivos: Recuperación de la Memoria Histórica de Rabinal (1944–1996). Baja Verapaz: Rabinal.Google Scholar

Mychalejko, C. (2013). Profiting from genocide: The World Bank’s bloody history in Guatemala. Truthout, March 8, 2013.Google Scholar

Oxfam Issue Briefing. (2015). The suffering of others: The human cost of the International Financial Corporation’s lending through financial intermediaries. Oxfam Issue Briefing, April 2015, pp. 11–13. Oxford: Oxfam.Google Scholar

Pacenza, M. (1996). A people damned: The Chixoy dam, Guatemalan massacres and the World Bank. Multinational Monitor, 17(7–8), 8–12.Google Scholar

Partridge, W. (1983). Comparative Analysis of Bid Experience with Resettlement: Based on Evaluations of the Arenal and Chixoy Projects. New York: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar

Partridge, W. (1984). Recommendations for Human Resettlement and Community Reconstruction Components of the Chixoy Project. New York: World Bank.Google Scholar

Postel, S. and Richter, B. (2012). Rivers for Life: Managing Water for People and Nature. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Renaud, F., Syvitski, J., Sebesvari, Z., Werners, S. E., Kremer, H., Kuenzer, C., Ramesh, R., Jeuken, A., and Friedrich, J. (2013). Tipping from the Holocene to the Anthropocene: How threatened are major world deltas? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 644–54.Google Scholar

Richter, B., Postel, S., Revenga, C., Scudder, T., Lehner, B., Churchill, A. and Chow, M. (2010). Lost in development’s shadow: The downstream human consequences of dam. Water Alternatives 3, 14–42.Google Scholar

Schofield, T. (1998). Environment as an ideological weapon: A proposal to criminalize environmental terrorism. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 26(3), 619–47.Google Scholar

Schirmer, J. (1998). The Guatemalan Military Project: A Violence Called Democracy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Scudder, T. (2005). The Future of Large Dams: Dealing with Social. Environmental, Institutional and Political Costs. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Toussaint, E. (2014). “Domination of the United States on the World Bank. Bretton Woods, the World Bank and the IMF: 70th anniversary (Part 7). Committee for the Abolition of Illegitimate Debt,” www.cadtm.org/.Google Scholar

Van Cappellen, P. and Maavara, T. (2016). Rivers in the Anthropocene: Global scale modifications of riverine nutrient fluxes by damming. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 16(2), 106–11.Google Scholar

Vörösmarty, C., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., Glidden, S., Bunn, S., Sullivan, C., Liermann, C., and Davies, P. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467(7315), 555–61.Google Scholar

Westing, A. (1980). Warfare in a Fragile World: Military Impact on the Human Environment. Stockholm: SIPRI.Google Scholar

World Bank. (1951). “Guatemala Economic Development Plan,” http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/527361468251181949/text/multi0page.txt.Google Scholar

World Bank Group Archives. (2001). “World Bank Group historical chronology,” http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTARCHIVES/Resources/Bank%20chronology.pdf.Google Scholar

World Commission on Dams. (2000). Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-making: the Report of the World Commission on Dams. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

World Wildlife Federation. (2015). “Free-flowing rivers: Economic luxury or ecological necessity?” Appendix 1:12, www.wwf.se/source.php/1120326/free.Google Scholar