Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 April 2023
To refuse to change a slogan or established attitude or ancient shibboleth, merely because it is consecrated by time or possesses sentimental value, is unworthy of a progressive party. (Anthony Crosland, 19621)
Middle-class suburbia became increasingly disillusioned with the privations and restrictions of Attlee’s ‘consensus’. (I. Zweiniger-Barcielowska, 1994 )
The need for a restatement of doctrine is hardly surprising. The old doctrines did not spring from a vacuum, or from acts of pure cerebration performed in a monastery cell. Each was the product of a particular kind of society, and of minds reacting to that society… And as society has changed again since before the war, so again a restatement of objectives is called for. The matter can be put quite simply. Traditional socialism was largely concerned with the evils of traditional capitalism, and with the need for its overthrow. But today traditional capitalism has been reformed and modified almost out of existence, and it is with a quite different form of society that socialists must now concern themselves. (Anthony Crosland, 19563)
Introduction: Crosland’s legacy as revisionist political strategist
Crosland insisted that post-war socialism must abandon consecrated slogans favouring up-to-date sociological investigation and iconoclastic political analysis. Through his numerous organisational activities and writings, Crosland contributed to discussions about the electoral and political strategy of Labour in post-war Britain. This chapter examines his legacy as a political strategist and ‘apparatchik’ who informed Labour about the imperative of adapting its ideas and programme in the light of economic and social change; he argued ‘if socialism is to survive in the modern world, it must undergo a process of modernisation’. The strategy of renovation was paramount in the wake of Labour’s electoral annihilation in the 1950s, particularly its third consecutive defeat in 1959. Crosland’s objective was not to abandon Labour’s values to secure political power but to ensure that social democracy addressed the needs of contemporary society, proposing relevant and practical policies to attract a broad coalition of voters. This approach required reforms of the party machinery to win the battle of organisation and ideas, externally against a resurgent and populist Conservative party, and internally against the Communist-inspired Left. The British Labour party in the aftermath of the bruising Bevanite and Gaitskellite battles of the 1950s was ‘a tumultuous alliance of diverse parts’.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.