Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 April 2022
Introduction
Parental behaviour and parents in general have not been of interest in previous poverty surveys; a fact reflected in their omission from publications based on earlier Poverty and Social Exclusion (PSE) research. What justifies their inclusion this time is a changing popular, political and policy climate which has placed parents and their behaviours as centrally important to current and future levels of poverty in the UK. Parents are now framed as both the cause of, and potentially solution to, child poverty in a way not previously witnessed (Dermott, 2013).
Parents’ experience of poverty and social exclusion
Parents are generally at higher risk of poverty than non-parents because of the added financial cost of children (Misra et al, 2012). In the UK, it has been argued, that this is at least partly due to a process of ‘defamilization’ (Lewis and Giullari, 2005), which has meant that private formal childcare plays a significant part in many families’ organisation of care (albeit as an element of complicated mixture of provision alongside other family members, state providers, and voluntary organisations; Daly, 2011). The UK has among the highest costs for childcare of any country in Europe, equivalent to 26.6% of family income (Norman, 2014); significantly more mothers in the UK say that they do not work or work part-time because childcare services are too expensive (European Commission, 2013). Lone mothers have consistently been an even poorer group than parents as a whole (Bradshaw et al, 2000; Dermott and Pantazis, 2014; Dermott and Pomati, 2016a), as initiatives to encourage or coerce them into the labour market have largely failed to generate sufficient income to overcome poverty (Harkness, 2013).
Social exclusion is a broader concept than low income or deprivation and covers a range of dimensions, including access to services, social support and relationships, and access to social and economic participation (Levitas et al, 2007). It refers to the way in which disadvantage can include various forms of disconnection from the community; ‘The implications of the concept of social exclusion for research on parenting are that research should … [include] factors such as connectedness with the local community and … access to mainstream services and transport’ (Katz et al, 2007, p 6).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.