Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-2tv5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-14T07:15:04.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion: Pastoral Futures in Dialogue with Environmental Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2025

Maura Benegiamo
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi, Pisa
Get access

Summary

Although it failed, the project to allocate part of the Ndiaël Avifauna Reserve to agro-intensive exploitation remains a priority in local development plans. This confirms that the phenomenon of land-grabbing cannot be traced back to a single decision to grant a concession or a single land privatization, understood as an event in itself. Rather, it outlines a process, albeit a long one, of redefining relations between subjects, rights and territories, the course of which, in the Senegalese case, will also depend on the ability to build and strengthen alliances between peasant and pastoralist groups at local, regional and national levels in order to secure recognition of pastoralist land rights. Recognition has also been made urgent by the launch of a national land reform process that has gained momentum in Senegal since the early 2000s, precisely in relation to the opening up to foreign investors advocated by the new agricultural policy (Benegiamo, 2020). Today, the reform process is led by the World Bank, as a result of the Projet de Développement Inclusif et Durable de l’Agribusiness au Senegal (PDIDAS; Sustainable and Inclusive Agribusiness Development Project of Senegal),1 launched in 2016, which aims to make 10,000 hectares of land in the delta available for the arrival of foreign investors and the development of commercial horticulture.

Although the project was still at an early stage in terms of ‘valorizing’ the land identified and providing work for the rural communities that have ceded it, it had developed a method of land management for investment, based on a cadastral register, which, if extended to the whole country, would, according to the Bank, make it possible to implement ‘une réforme foncière en douceur’ (World Bank, 2019, pp 16 and 30).

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×