Kant, Immanuel. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (Hartknoch, 1785, 1786, reprographic reprint Harald Fischer, 1984)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, herausgegeben von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, bearbeitet von Paul Menzer in Kant's gesammelte Schriften, vol. IV (Reimer, 1903)

Kant, Immanuel Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, ed. Vorländer, Karl (Dürrsche Buchhandlung, 1906)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, ed. Buchenau, Artur and Cassirer, Ernst, in Kants Werke, vol. IV (Cassirer, 1921)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, ed. Otto, Rudolf (Klotz, 1930)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, ed. Valentiner, Theodor (Reclam, 1961)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, ed. Kraft, Bernd and Schönecker, Dieter (Meiner, 1999)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, ed. Timmermann, Jens (Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2004)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Ethics, trans. Abbott, Thomas K. (Longman, 1873)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. The Moral Law. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. Paton, H. J. (Hutchinson, 1948)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, and What is Enlightenment? trans. Beck, Lewis White (Bobbs Merrill, 1959)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Ellington, James W. (Hackett, 1981)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Gregor, Mary (Cambridge University Press, 1998; first published in 1996)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Hill, Thomas E. Jr and Zweig, Arnulf (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Wood, Allen W. (Yale University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Abbott, Thomas K., revised by Denis, Lara (Broadview, 2005)Google Scholar

Aune, Bruce. Kant's Theory of Morals (Princeton University Press, 1979)Google Scholar

Duncan, A. R. C.Practical Reason and Morality. A Study of Immanuel Kant's ‘Foundations for the Metaphysics of Morals’ (Thomas Nelson, 1957)Google Scholar

Freudiger, Jürg. Kants Begründung der praktischen Philosophie (Paul Haupt, 1993)Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul, ed. Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Critical Essays (Rowman & Littlefield, 1998)Google Scholar

Höffe, Otfried, ed. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Ein kooperativer Kommentar (Klostermann, 1989, 1993)Google Scholar

Horn, Christoph and Schönecker, Dieter, eds. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (De Gruyter, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paton, H. J.The Categorical Imperative. A Study in Kant's Philosophy (Hutchinson, 1947)Google Scholar

Ross, David. Kant's Ethical Theory. A Commentary on thezur, GrundlegungSitten, Metaphysik (Clarendon Press, 1954)Google Scholar

Schönecker, Dieter and Wood, Allen W.Kants ‘Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten’ (Schöningh, 2002)Google Scholar

Schönecker, Dieter. Kant: Grundlegung III. Die Deduktion des kategorischen Imperativs (Alber, 1999)Google Scholar

Tittel, Gottlob August. Über Herrn Kant's Moralreform (Pfähler, 1786)Google Scholar

Wolff, Robert Paul. The Autonomy of Reason. A Commentary on Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Harper & Row, 1973)Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E.Kant's Theory of Freedom (Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameriks, Karl. Interpreting Kant's Critiques (Clarendon Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

, Baron Marcia. Kantian Ethics almost without Apology (Cornell University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White. A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason (University of Chicago Press, 1960)Google Scholar

Cummiskey, David. Kantian Consequentialism (Oxford University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esser, Andrea. Eine Ethik für Endliche (Frommann-Holzboog, 2004)Google Scholar

Gregor, Mary. Laws of Freedom (Blackwell, 1963)Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness (Cambridge University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment (Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Hill, Thomas E.Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant's Moral Theory (Cornell University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Hill, Thomas E.Human Welfare and Moral Worth. Kantian Perspectives (Clarendon Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerstein, Samuel. Kant's Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality (Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine. Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landucci, Sergio. Sull'etica di Kant (Guerini, 1994)Google Scholar

Louden, Robert B.Morality and Moral Theory (Oxford University Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Louden, Robert B.Kant's Impure Ethics (Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Nell, Onora. Acting on Principle (Columbia University Press, 1975)Google Scholar

O'Neill, Onora. Constructions of Reason (Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Reath, Andrews. Agency and Autonomy in Kant's Moral Theory (Clarendon Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwaiger, Clemens. Kategorische und andere Imperative. Zur Entwicklung von Kants praktischer Philosophie bis 1785 (Frommann-Holzboog, 1999)Google Scholar

Schwartz, Maria. Der Begriff der Maxime bei Kant (Lit Verlag, 2006)Google Scholar

Timmermann, Jens. Sittengesetz und Freiheit. Untersuchungen über Immanuel Kants Theorie des freien Willens (De Gruyter, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Timmons, Mark, ed. Kant's Metaphysics of Morals (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Tomasi, Gabriele. Identità razionale e moralità (Associazione Trentina, 1991)Google Scholar

Wood, Allen W.Kant's Ethical Thought (Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Henry E.Kant's Transcendental Idealism (Yale University Press, 1983, 2004)Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. Eichmann in Jerusalem (Piper, 1986; first published in 1964)Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan. ‘Aristotle and the Methods of Ethics’, in Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34 (1980), 490–511Google Scholar

Bittner, Rüdiger. ‘Maximen’, in Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, ed. Funke, G. (De Gruyter, 1974), vol. II.2, pp. 485–98.Google Scholar

Bittner, Rüdiger and Cramer, Konrad, eds. Materialien zu Kants ‘Kritik der praktischen Vernunft’ (Suhrkamp, 1975)Google Scholar

Cicero, . Abhandlung über die menschlichen Pflichten, trans. Garve, Christian (Wilhelm Gottlieb Korn, 1783)Google Scholar

Cramer, Konrad. Nicht-reine synthetische Urteile a priori. Ein Problem der Transzendentalphilosophie Immanuel Kants (Carl Winter, 1985)Google Scholar

Garve, Christian. Philosophische Anmerkungen und Abhandlungen zu Ciceros Büchern von den Pflichten (Wilhelm Gottlieb Korn, 1783)Google Scholar

Gilbert, Carlos Melchios. Der Einfluß von Christian Garves Übersetzung Ciceros ‘De Officiis’ auf Kants ‘Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten’ (S. Röderer, 1994)Google Scholar

Hare, R. M.‘Could Kant Have Been a Utilitarian’, Utilitas 5 (1993), 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henrich, Dieter. ‘Das Prinzip der kantischen Ethik’, in Philosophische Rundschau 2 (1954–5), 29–34Google Scholar

Herman, B. ‘Moral Deliberation and the Derivation of Duties’, in The Practice of Moral Judgment (Harvard University Press, 1993), pp. 132–58Google Scholar

Kagan, Shelly. ‘Kantianism for Consequentialists’, in Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Wood, Allen (Yale University Press, 2002), pp. 111–56Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred. Kant. A Biography (Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred ‘Kant and Cicero’, in Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, ed. Gerhardt, V., Horstmann, R.-P. and Schumacher, R. (De Gruyter, 2001), vol. III, 270–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N.The Hellenistic Philosophers (Cambridge University Press, 1987)Google Scholar

O'Neill, Onora. ‘Kant after Virtue’, in Constructions of Reason (Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 145–62Google Scholar

Patzig, Günther. ‘Der Gedanke eines Kategorischen Imperativs’, Archiv für Philosophie 6 (1956), 82–96Google Scholar

Prauss, Gerold. Kant und das Problem der Dinge an sich (Bouvier, 1974, 1977)Google Scholar

Proops, Ian. ‘Kant's Legal Metaphor and the Nature of Deduction’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003), 209–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reich, Klaus. Kant und die Ethik der Griechen (Mohr, 1935); translated as ‘Kant and Greek Ethics’ in Mind 48 (1939), 446–63Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich. Werke, ed. Fricke, G. and Göpfert, H. G. (Hanser, 1987)Google Scholar

Schneewind, J. B.The Invention of Autonomy (Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Sidgwick, Henry. The Methods of Ethics (Macmillan, 1874, 1907)Google Scholar

Timmermann, Jens. ‘Depositum’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 57 (2003), 589–600Google Scholar

Timmermann, Jens‘When the Tail Wags the Dog. Animal Welfare and Indirect Duty in Kantian Ethics’, The Kantian Review 10 (2005), 128–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Timmermann, Jens‘Why Kant Could not Have Been a Utilitarian’, Utilitas 17 (2005), 243–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Timmermann, Jens‘Kant on Conscience, “Indirect” Duty and Moral Error’, International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2006), 293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vaihinger, Hans. Commentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft (W. Spemann, 1881)Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality (Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard. ‘Internal and External Reasons’, in Moral Luck (Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 101–13 (first published in 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolf, Susan. Freedom within Reason (Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Wood, Allen W. ‘The Final Form of Kant's Practical Philosophy’, in Timmons, M., ed., Kant's Metaphysics of Morals (Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 1–21Google Scholar