Ugly currents in modern economics

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511493317.003

2 - Ugly currents in modern economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Mark Blaug

Edited by

Uskali Mäki

Show author details

Mark Blaug: Affiliation:
Professor Emeritus University of London and Buckingham University, UK; Visiting Professor of Economics University of Amsterdam; Erasmus University of Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Fellow British Academy; Foreign Honorary Member Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
Uskali Mäki: Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

The last few years have seen an astonishing series of books and articles with titles like The Decline of Economics (Cassidy 1996), The Crisis of Vision in Modern Economic Thought (Heilbroner and Milberg 1996), Against Economics (Kanth 1996), The End of Economics (Perelman 1996), and even The Death of Economics (Omerod 1994). A survey of graduate students in elite American universities by Arjo Klamer and David Colander (1987, 1990) revealed a striking lack of interest among young would-be economists either in the economy or in the literature of economics; success in the economics profession, they shrewdly perceived, came principally to those with a knowledge of mathematical economics and econometrics. The study sparked a chorus of complaints about the nature of economic research and training at top universities in the Western world and led in 1991 to a full-scale report of a Commission on Graduate Education in Economics (1991) sponsored by the American Economic Association. The commission included leading figures in the economics profession and, like all such reports, produced a blend of various views in which, however, one dominant note appeared repeatedly: economics as taught in graduate schools has become increasingly preoccupied with formal technique to the deliberate exclusion of historical and institutional understanding. More recently, John Hey (1997), the Managing Editor of The Economic Journal, the leading economics journal in the UK, looked back over ten years of his editorship and summed up his appraisal of the type of papers that were regularly submitted to the journal:

Many of the submissions do not appear to be written in order to further economic knowledge.[…]

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Fact and Fiction in Economics
Models, Realism and Social Construction
, pp. 35 - 56

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493317.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akerlof, George (1970). The market for “lemons,” quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500CrossRef Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J. and Debreu, Gerard (1954). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events, Economics Journal, 99, 78–96Google Scholar

Backhouse, Roger (1997). Truth and Progress in Economics Knowledge. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar

Bell, Daniel and Irving Kristol (1994). Crisis in Economic Theory. New York: Basic Books

Bhaskar, Roy (1978). A Realist Theory of Science. Brighton: Harvester Press

Bhaskar, Roy (1979). The Possibility of Naturalism. Brighton: Harvester Press

Blaug, Mark (1989). Nicholas Kaldor, 1908–86, in David Greenaway and John R. Presley (eds.), Pioneers of Modern Economics in Britain. London: Macmillan, 77–80CrossRef

Blaug, Mark (1992). Methodology of Economics, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201–204

Blaug, Mark (1995). Afterword, in Neil De Marchi and Mark Blaug, Appraising Economic Theories. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 509

Blaug, Mark (1997). Competition as an end-state and competition as a process, in Mark Blaug, Not Only an Economist: Recent Essays. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, chapter 6

Blaug, Ricardo (1994). Habermas's treatment for relativism, Politics, 14(2), 51–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Boylan, Terence A. and Peter F. O'Gorman (1995). Beyond Rhetoric and Realism in Economics. London: Routledge

Cassidy, John (1996). The decline of economics, The New Yorker, December 2, 42–49Google Scholar

Clower, Robert (1995a). Axiomatics in economics, Southern Economic Journal, 62(2), 307–319CrossRef Google Scholar

Clower, Robert (1995b). Economics as an inductive science, in Robert Clower, Economic Doctrine and Method: Selected Papers of R. W. Clower. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar

Coase, Ronald (1993a). The institutional structure of production, American Economic Review, 82, 229–234Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald (1993b). The institutional structure of production, in Oliver E. Williamson and Sidney E. Winter (eds.), The Native of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 227–235

Commission on Graduate Education (1991). Report of the Commission on Graduate Education in Economics, The Journal of Economic Literature, 29, 1035–1087

Cross, Rodney, (ed.), (1995). The Natural Rate of Unemployment: Reflections on 25 years of the Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chapters 3, 5CrossRef

Darnell, Adrian C. (1997). Imprecise tests and imprecise hypotheses, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 44(3), 247–268CrossRef Google Scholar

Debreu, Gerard (1959). Theory of Value

Dosi, Giovanni, Chris Freeman et al. (1998). Technical Change and Economic Theory. New York: Columbia University Press

Eichner Andrew S. (ed.) (1983). Why Economics is Not Yet a Science? London: Macmillan, 90–125, 205–241

Fisher, Frank M. (1989). Games economists play: a noncooperative view, Rand Journal of Economics, 20(1), 113–124CrossRef Google Scholar

Frey, Bruno S. and Eichenberger, Raymond (1993). American and European economics and economists, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(4), 185–193CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibbons, Richard (1997). An introduction to applicable game theory, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 127–149CrossRef Google Scholar

Habermas, Jurgen (1990). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. London: Polity Press

Habermas, Jurgen (1992). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. London: Polity Press

Hausman, Daniel (1997). Theory appraisal in neoclassical economics, Journal of Economic Methodology, 4(2), 289–296CrossRef Google Scholar

Heilbroner, Robert and William Milberg (1996). The Crisis of Vision in Modern Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Hey, John (1997). The Economic Journal. Report of the Managing Editor, Royal Economic Society Newsletter, January, 3–5Google Scholar

Hicks, John (1939). Value and Capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (1983). Economics and Evolution. Bringing Life Back Into Economics. London: Polity Press

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (1985). Economics and Institutions. A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. London: Polity Press

Hoover, Kevin D. (1995). Facts and artifacts: calibration and the empirical assessment of real-business-cycle models, Oxford Economics Papers, 47(1), 24–44CrossRef Google Scholar

Howitt, Peter (1997). Expectations and uncertainty in contemporary Keynesian models, in G. C. Harcourt and P. A. Riach (eds.), A “Second Edition” of the General Theory, 1. London: Routledge, 239–240

Kaldor, Nicholas (1972). The irrelevence of equilibrium economics, Economic Journal, 82(4), 1237–1255CrossRef Google Scholar

Kaldor, Nicholas (1985). Economics without Equilibrium. Cardiff: University College Cardiff Press

Kanth, Rajani (1996). Against Economics. Aldershot: Ash Gate Publishing

Klamer, Arjo and Colander, David (1987). The making of an economist, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(2), 95–111Google Scholar

Klamer, Arjo and David Colander (1990). The Making of an Economist. Boulder, CO: Westview Press

Kurz, Heinz and Neri Salvadori (1997). On critics and protective belts, in Salanti, Andrea and Evnesto Screpanti (eds.), Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 232–259

Lawson, Tony (1997). Economics and Reality, London Routledge, 204, 288–289

Leontief, Wassily (1971). Theoretical assumptions and nonobserved facts, American Economic Review, 6(1), 1–7Google Scholar

Lipsey, Richard G. (1979). Can the market economy survive?, in Richard G. Lipsey, Microeconomics, Growth and Political Economy: Essays by Richard G. Lipsey, I. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 367–401

Lucas, Robert E., Jr. and Thomas Sargent (1981). Rational Expectations and Econometric Practice. Minneapolis: Minnesota Press

McCloskey, D. N. (1986). The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press (2nd edn., 1998)

McCloskey, D. N. (1994). Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Mäki, Uskali (1995). Diagnosing McCloskey, The Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 1300–1318Google Scholar

Malinvaud, Edmond (1997). The proper role of theory, in P. A. G. van Bergeijk et al. (eds.), Economic Science and Practice. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 149–165

Morgan, Thomas (1988). Theory versus empiricism in academic economics: update and comparison, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(4), 159–164CrossRef Google Scholar

Murrell, Peter (1991). Can neoclassical economics underpin the reform of centrally planned economies?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(4), 59–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Myles, Gareth D. (1995). Public Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney Winter (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Boston: Harvard University Press

Omerod, Paul (1994). The Death of Economics. London: Faber

Pack, Hal (1994). Endogenous growth theory: intellectual appeal and empirical shortcomings, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(1), 55–72CrossRef Google Scholar

Perelman, Michael (1996). The End of Economics. London: Routledge

Prescott, Edward and Kydland, Finn E. (1982). Time-to-build and aggregate fluctuations, Econometrica, 50, 138–157Google Scholar

Robinson, Joan (1933). The Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan

Robinson, Joan (1956). The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan

Rosen, Sherwin (1997). Austrian and neoclassical economics: any gains from trade?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4), 139–152CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Alexander (1983). If economics isn't science, what is it?, Philosophical Forum, 14: 296–314Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Nathan (1994). Exploring the Black Box

Rubinstein, Ariel (1990). Game Theory in Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, IX

Rubinstein, Ariel (1995). John Nash: the master of economic modelling, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97(1), 9–13CrossRef

Rutherford, Mark (1994). Institutions in Economics. The Old and the New Institutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Ryan, Charles and Andrew Mullineux (1997). The ups and downs of modern business cycle theory, in Brian Snowdon and Howard Vane, Reflections on the Development of Modern Macroeconomics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 141–147

Salanti, Andrea and Ernesto Screpanti (eds.) (1997). Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar

Scherer, F. Mark and David Ross (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 2nd edn. New York: Harper, 106–110

Screpanti, Ernesto (1997). Afterword: can methodological pluralism be a methodological canon?, in Andrea Salanti and Ernesto Screpanti (eds.), Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar

Shepherd, George B. (1995). Rejected. Leading Economists Ponder the Publication Process. Boston: Thomas Horton & Daughters, 53–54

Simon, Herbert A. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality, in Spiro Latsis (ed.), Methodological Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Solow, Robert (1992). Growth theory, in David Greenaway et al. (eds.), Companion to Contemporary Economic Thought. London: Routledge, 393–415

Solow, Robert (1997). How did economics get that way and what way did it get?, Daedalus, 126, 39–58

Summers, Lawrence H. (1991). The scientific illusion in empirical macroeconomics, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 93(2), 129–148CrossRef Google Scholar

Tarascio, Vincent (1997). The problem of knowledge in economics, Southern Economic Journal, 64(1), 8–11CrossRef Google Scholar

Tirole, Jan (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Boston: MIT Press

Varian, Hal R. (1990). Intermediate Microeconomics. A Modern Approach, 2nd edn. New York: W. W. Norton

Vromen, Jack (1995). Economic Evolution. An Enquiry into the Foundations of the (New) Institutional Economics. London: RoutledgeCrossRef

Wade Hands, D. (1997). Empirical realism as meta-method: Tony Lawson and neoclassical economics, Ekonomia, 1(2), 39–53Google Scholar

Walker, Donald (1997). Advances in General Equilibrium Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar

Wiles, Peter and Guy Routh (1984). Economics in Disarray. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.