Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figure
- List of contributors
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Marriage: the long-term contract
- 3 Marital commitment and the legal regulation of divorce
- 4 Mutual consent divorce
- 5 An economic approach to adultery law
- 6 Louisiana's covenant marriage law: recapturing the meaning of marriage for the sake of the children
- 7 Cohabitation and marriage
- 8 Marriage as a signal
- 9 For better or for worse? Is bargaining in marriage and divorce efficient?
- 10 Weak men and disorderly women: divorce and the division of labor
- 11 The impact of legal reforms on marriage and divorce
- 12 European divorce laws, divorce rates, and their consequences
- Index
- References
10 - Weak men and disorderly women: divorce and the division of labor
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 August 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figure
- List of contributors
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Marriage: the long-term contract
- 3 Marital commitment and the legal regulation of divorce
- 4 Mutual consent divorce
- 5 An economic approach to adultery law
- 6 Louisiana's covenant marriage law: recapturing the meaning of marriage for the sake of the children
- 7 Cohabitation and marriage
- 8 Marriage as a signal
- 9 For better or for worse? Is bargaining in marriage and divorce efficient?
- 10 Weak men and disorderly women: divorce and the division of labor
- 11 The impact of legal reforms on marriage and divorce
- 12 European divorce laws, divorce rates, and their consequences
- Index
- References
Summary
There are people in Europe who, confounding together the different characteristics of the sexes, would make of man and woman beings not only equal but alike. They would give to both the same functions, impose on both the same duties, and grant to both the same rights; they would mix them in all things – their} occupations, their pleasures, their business. It may readily be conceived, that by thus attempting to make one sex equal to the other, both are degraded; and from so preposterous a medley of the works of nature nothing could ever result but weak men and disorderly women. … The Americans have applied to the sexes the great principle of political economy which governs the manufactures of our age, by carefully dividing the duties of man from those of woman, in order that the great work of society may be the better carried on.
(De Tocqueville, 1835, ch. Ⅻ)De Tocqueville's observations about the political economy of gender relations at the beginning of the nineteenth century reflected the prevailing patterns of employment; husbands were gainfully employed for pay, and wives cared for home and family (see also Brinig and Carbone, 1988). In the new millennium, this pattern no longer describes most American couples. Some writers have surmised that the divorce rate has increased because the modern marriage deal is unfair to women (Parkman, 1998), who must do “two shifts” – their labor force hours plus the hours of housework that remain (Hochschild and Machung, 1989).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Law and Economics of Marriage and Divorce , pp. 171 - 190Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
References
(1992), “What Does She See in Him? The Effect of Sharing on the Choice of Spouse,” Economic Inquiry, 3(1), 57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1973), “A Theory of Marriage, Part I,” Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1974), “A Theory of Marriage: Part II,” Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), S11–26CrossRef
Becker, Gary S. (1975), Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Specific Reference to Education, 2nd edn., New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, Columbia University Press
Becker, Gary S. (1985), “Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor,” Journal of Labor Economics, 3, S33–58CrossRef
Becker, Gary S. (1991), A Treatise on the Family, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
, , and (1977), “An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability,” Journal of Political Economy, 85(6), 1141–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, Sarah Fenstermaker (1995), The Gender Factory: The Apportionment of Work in American Households, New York: Plenum Press
(1998), “Trends in the Well-Being of American Women, 1970–95,” Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 112–65Google Scholar
(1994), “Comment on Jana Singer's Alimony and Efficiency,” Georgetown Law Journal, 82, 2461–79Google Scholar
and (2000), “These Boots Are Made for Walking: Why Most Divorce Filers are Women,” American Law and Economics Review, 2, 126–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1988), “The Reliance Interest in Marriage and Divorce,” Tulane Law Review, 62, 853–905Google Scholar
Bumpass, Larry L. and James A. Sweet (1995), “Cohabitation, Marriage and Union Stability: Preliminary Findings from NSFH2,” NSFH Working Paper No. 65, Madison, Center for Demography and Ecology
(1995), “Rhetoric, the Unnatural Family, and Women's Work,” Virginia Law Review, 81, 2275–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Beverly and Otis D. Duncan (1978), Sex Typing and Social Roles: A Research Report, New York: Academic Press
Goldscheider, Frances K. and Linda J. Waite (1991), New Families, No Families? The Transformation of the American Home, Berkeley: University of California Press
(1980), “Home Production – A Forgotten Industry,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 62(3), 408–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossbard-Schechtman, Shoshana (1993), On the Economics of Marriage: A Theory of Marriage, Labor, and Divorce, Boulder, CO: Westview Press
(1993), “Households at Work: beyond Labor Market Policies to Remedy the Gender Gap,” Georgetown Law Journal, 82, 89–107Google Scholar
Hadfield, Gillian K. (1999), “A Coordination Model of Sexual Division of Labor,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 40, 125–53CrossRef
(1991), “Moral Reasoning and the Marital Exchange Relationship,” Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie and Anne Machung (1989), The Second Shift, New York: Viking Penguin
and (1994), “Relative Fairness and the Division of Housework: The Importance of Options,” American Journal of Sociology, 100, 506–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995), “Commitment and Dependency in Marriage,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 503–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkman, Allen W. (1992), No-Fault Divorce: What Went Wrong? Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Parkman, Allen W. (1998), “Why Are Married Women Working So Hard?” International Review of Law and Economics, 18, 41–9CrossRef
Regan, Milton C. (1999), Alone Together: Love and the Meaning of Marriage, Oxford: Oxford University Press
, , and (1995), “Trust in Close Relationships,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, Beth Ann (1992), Men, Women, and Time: Gender Differences in Paid Work, Housework and Leisure, New York: Greenwood Press
(1996), “Turning Labor into Love: Housework and the Law,” Northwestern University Law Review, 91, 1–86Google Scholar
(1990), “The Partnership Theory of Marriage: A Borrowed Solution Fails,” Texas Law Review 68, 689–743Google Scholar
, , and (1998), “Identifying Underlying Dimensions in Spouses' Evaluations of Fairness in the Division of Household Labor,” Social Science Research, 27, 305–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spain, Daphne G. and Suzanne M. Bianchi (1996), Balancing Act: Motherhood, Marriage, and Employment Among American Women, New York: Russell Sage Foundation
(1991), “Family Work: Women's Sense of Fairness,” Journal of Family Issues, 12, 181–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de (1835), Democracy in America. New York: Vintage Books, ed. 1954
United States Department of Labor (1988), Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Employment, Hours and Earnings, Series ID: EEU80729004, etc
United States Department of the Census (1998), Statistical Abstract of the United States, Rockville, MD
(1988), “When Justice Replaces Affection: The Need for Rights,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 11, 625–47Google Scholar
- 10
- Cited by