Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on contributors
- An introduction
- Part I Children's understanding of places
- 1 Scale in children's experience with the environment
- 2 The problem of lost children
- 3 Children's understanding of environmental representations: aerial photographs and model towns
- 4 Children's knowledge of countries
- Part II Children's experience of places
- Part III Adolescents' worlds?
- Part IV Children and the design process
- Index
- References
1 - Scale in children's experience with the environment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 October 2009
By
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on contributors
- An introduction
- Part I Children's understanding of places
- 1 Scale in children's experience with the environment
- 2 The problem of lost children
- 3 Children's understanding of environmental representations: aerial photographs and model towns
- 4 Children's knowledge of countries
- Part II Children's experience of places
- Part III Adolescents' worlds?
- Part IV Children and the design process
- Index
- References
Summary
Children's daily lives are complex, unique, and inherently spatial (Hart, 1979). Children explore the space around them even before they are mobile. Before they can locomote, or move from place to place (crawl, walk, run, etc.) independently, infants are interested in many of the things that fall within their reach. As will be discussed later, and as Piaget and others have suggested, these early explorations play an important role in how children come to know the world around them. One way we can understand the role that space plays in the lives of children is through scale. Scale provides a context within which spaces, places, and environments of different types can be integrated and better understood.
Definitions of scale and space
As valuable as scale is for understanding the relationships among different environments it is also a complex construct that has been extended to disparate classes of spaces, places, and geographies. For example, geographers study phenomena at various scales and often use the term scale to help define their research interests. Scale is also employed in many other disciplines to help define phenomena, concepts, interactions, and relationships. Lay definitions of scale, both related and unrelated to the stricter definitions employed in academic endeavours, also exist. For these reasons the use of the term scale varies in different contexts and can lead to confusion.
There have been a few attempts to categorize the nature of these different classes of definitions and provide a systematic understanding of scale across disciplines.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Children and their EnvironmentsLearning, Using and Designing Spaces, pp. 13 - 25Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
(2002). Spatial cognition and scale: A child's perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1–2), 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). Young children's understanding of the correspondence between a scale model and a larger space. Cognitive Development, 4(2), 121–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLoache, J. S. (1990). Young children's understanding of models. In and (eds.), Knowing and Remembering in Young Children. Emory Symposia in Cognition, vol.III (pp. 94–126). New York: Cambridge University Press.
, and (1997). The credible shrinking room: Very young children's performance with symbolic and nonsymbolic relations. Psychological Science, 8(4), 308–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998). Spatial and Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Information Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (1997). Human conceptions of spaces: Implications for Geographic Information Systems. Transactions in GIS, 2(4), 361–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freundschuh, S. M. (1997). Research in geography, space, and development: How can it inform geographic education? In and (eds.), The First Assessment: Research in Geographic Education (pp. 68–81). San Marcos: The Gilbert M. Grosvenor Center for Geographic Education.Google Scholar
Gärling, T. and Golledge, R. G. (1987). Environmental perception and cognition. In and (eds.), Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design (vol. II, pp. 203–36). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979). Children's Experience of Place. New York: Irvington Publishers, distributed by Halsted Press.Google Scholar
, and (1982). Effects of motor activity on children's intentional and incidental memory for spatial locations. Child Development, 53(1), 239–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1982). Children's memory for spatial locations: The influence of recall perspective and type of environment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34(2), 257–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2003). Does information about what things are influence children's memory for where things are?Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 939–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1979). The coding and transformation of spatial information. Cognitive Psychology, 11(3), 375–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ittelson, W. H. (1973). Environmental perception and contemporary perceptual theory. In (ed.), Environmental and Cognition (pp. 1–19). New York: Seminar.Google Scholar
and (1972). An examination of the developmental relations between certain spatial tasks. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18(1), 39–52.Google Scholar
Lockman, J. J. and Pick, H. L. (1984). Problems of scale in spatial development. In (ed.), Origins of Cognitive Skills. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. (1983). Representation. In (ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology (4th edn, vol. III, pp. 420–94). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Mark, D. M. (1993). Toward a theoretical framework for geographical entity types. In and (eds.), Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS (pp. 270–83). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montello, D. R. (1993). Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In and (eds.), Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS (pp. 312–21). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2001). The development of reaching and looking preferences in infants to objects of different sizes. Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 561–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2001). The development of memory for location: What role do spatial-prototypes play?Child Development, 72(2), 370–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2003). Islands of practice and the Marston/Brenner debate: toward a more synthetic critical human geography. Progress in Physical Geography, 27(3), 317–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2003). Development of an abstract category representation for the spatial relation between in 6- to 10-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 151–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1998). Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(1), 215–26.Google ScholarPubMed
, , and (1999). Three spaces of spatial cognition. Professional Geographer, 51(4), 516–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1995). Waiting to use a symbol: The effects of delay on children's use of models. Child Development, 66(6), 1875–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1990). Young Children's Mental Representation of Spatial Information Acquired From Maps. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
(1982). Spatial cognition as a function of size and scale of the environment. New Directions for Child Development(15), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 4
- Cited by