Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T05:13:59.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Infanticide in red howlers: female group size, male membership, and a possible link to folivory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2009

Carel P. van Schaik
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Charles H. Janson
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Stony Brook
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Food acquisition and predator avoidance are two major factors proposed to promote social grouping in animals (Krebs & Davies 1987). In the primate literature, these two factors have been presented as alternative hypotheses (Wrangham 1980; van Schaik 1983). Defense against potential infanticide by new males also favors social grouping in primates: females form permanent associations with protective males, including their dependent infants' fathers (Wrangham 1979; van Schaik & Dunbar 1990; Smuts & Smuts 1993; van Schaik & Kappeler 1993, 1997; Sterck et al., 1997). The present volume originated from the recognition of the importance of infanticide avoidance in shaping primate social organization.

Factors favoring the formation of permanent social groups of females and males are not necessarily the same factors influencing the size of the groups. For example, many believe food competition to be the principal factor limiting primate group size (Janson 1988; van Schaik 1989; Isbell 1991; Janson & Goldsmith 1995). Upper group-size limits may be mediated by the maximum daily travel distance individuals can sustain as they forage in groups (Wrangham et al. 1993). In this chapter, we present evidence from red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus) that infanticide, too, may play a role in limiting group size in primates (see also Steenbeek, Chapter 7). When infanticide rates increase with the number of reproductive females, females may opt for dispersal, thus keeping total group size small. We propose that indirect evidence previously suggesting the role of food competition in limiting group size might actually reflect infanticide.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×