Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-nr592 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-12T10:46:35.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Confidentiality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

By
Anne Slowther  and
Irwin Kleinman
Edited by
Peter A. Singer  and
A. M. Viens
Anne Slowther
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer in Clinical Ethics University of Oxford
Irwin Kleinman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronta
Peter A. Singer
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
A. M. Viens
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Mr. J is 35 years old. He has had unprotected sex with prostitutes on at least two occasions. Although he is asymptomatic he is worried about the possibility that he may have contracted a sexually transmitted disease and consults his physician. After conducting a careful physical examination and providing appropriate counseling, the physician orders a number of investigations. The blood test comes back with a positive result for HIV. The physician offers to meet with Mr. J and his wife to assist with the disclosure of this information, but Mr. J states that he does not want his wife to know about his condition.

Ms. K is 29 years old and has epilepsy. Her driving license was revoked when she was first diagnosed with epilepsy and she has continued to have seizures every three to four months while on treatment. Ms. K mentions in passing to her physician that she sometimes drives short distances to get groceries. When her physician challenges her about this she says her seizures are very infrequent. Finally, the physician tells her he may have to notify the authorities. Ms. K asks what more the authorities can do as they have already revoked her license. Are they going to leave a police car outside her house to make sure she doesn't drive?

What is confidentiality?

If a person gives information to another in confidence there is an obligation on the person receiving the information not to disclose it to someone else.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics , pp. 43 - 48
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Medical Association (1995). AMA Code of Ethics: Policy Statement on Confidentiality. Washington, DC: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
American Medical Association (2006). Disclosure of Familial Risk in Genetic Testing, Policy statement E.2.131. Washington, DC: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
Australian Medical Association (2004). Code of Ethics. Barton, ACT: Australian Medical Association (http://www.ama.com.au/web.nsf/doc/WEEN-5WW598).Google Scholar
Canadian Medical Association (2004). Code of Ethics. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association (http://policybase.cma.ca/PolicyPDF/PD04-06.pdf).Google Scholar
Carlisle, J., Shickle, D., Cork, M., and McDonagh, A. (2006). Concerns over confidentiality may deter adolescents from consulting their doctors. A qualitative exploration. J Med Ethics 32: 133–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carman, D. and Britten, N. (1995). Confidentiality of medical records: the patient's perspective. Br J Gen Pract 45: 485–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Data Protection Act (1998). London: The Stationary Office (http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts1998/19980029.htm).
Edelstein, L. (1943). Hippocratic Oath: Text, Translation and Interpretation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Federal Privacy Act (1988). Canberra: Government Printing Office (http://www.privacy.gov.au/publications/privacy88_021205.pdf).
General Medical Council (2004). Confidentiality: Protecting and Providing Information. London: General Medical Council (http://www.gmc–uk.org/guidance/library/confidentiality.asp).Google Scholar
Gostin, L. O., Lazzarini, Z., and Flaherty, K. M. (1996). Legislative Survey of state confidentiality laws, with specific emphasis on HIV and immunization. JAMA 275: 1921–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallowell, N., Foster, C., Eeles, R., et al. (2003). Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information. J Med Ethics 29: 74–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingelfinger, J. R. and Drazen, J. M. (2004). Registry research and medical privacy. N Engl J Med 350: 1452–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, G., Merz, J. F. and Sankar, P. (2005). A qualitative study of women's views on medical confidentiality. J Med Ethics 31: 499–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lako, C. J., Huygen, F. J., Lindenthal, J. J., and Persoon, J. M. (1990). Handling of confidentiality in general practice: a survey among general practitioners in the Netherlands. Fam Pract 7: 34–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mabeck, C. E. (1985). Confidentiality in general practice. Fam Pract 2: 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, T. and Solomon, P. (2003). Professionals' responsibilities in releasing information to families of adults with mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 54: 1622–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mill, J. S. (1962). On liberty. In Utilitarianism: John Stuart Mill, ed. Warnock, M.. Glasgow: HarperCollins, pp. 126–250.Google Scholar
Offit, K., Groeger, E., Turner, S., Wadsworth, E. A., and Weiser, M. A. (2004). The “duty to warn” a patient's family members about hereditary disease risks. JAMA 292: 1469–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsen, J. C. and Sabin, B. R. (2003). Emergency department patient perceptions of privacy and confidentiality. J Emerg Med 25: 329–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, M. and Lucassen, A. M. (2004). Genetic information: a joint account?BMJ 329: 165–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez-Carceles, M. D., Pereniguez, J. E., Osuna, E., and Luna, A. (2005). Balancing confidentiality and the information provided to families of patients in primary care. J Med Ethics 31: 531–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peto, J., Fletcher, O., and Gilham, C. (2004). Data protection, informed consent, and research. BMJ 328: 1029–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plantinga, L., Natowicz, M. R., Kass, N. E.et al. (2003). Disclosure, confidentiality, and families: experiences and attitudes of those with genetic versus nongenetic medical conditions. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 119: 51–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. and Buchan, I. (2005). Electronic health records should support clinical research. J Med Internet Res 7: e4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, D. M., Fleming, R., and Swain, C. (2002). Effect of mandatory parental notification on adolescent girls' use of sexual health care services. JAMA 288: 710–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sankar, P., Mora, S., Merz, J. F., and Jones, N. L. (2003). Patient perspectives of medical confidentiality: a review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med 18: 659–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schers, H., Horst, H., Grol, R., and Berg, W. (2003). Continuity of information in general practice. Patient views on confidentiality. Scand J Prim Health Care 21: 21–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarassoff v. Regents of the University of California [1976] 529 P 2d 553 118, Cal Rptr 333.
Ubel, P. A., Zell, M. M., Miller, D. J., et al. (1995). Elevator talk: observational study of inappropriate comments in a public space. Am J Med 99: 190–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigod, S. N., Bell, C. M. and Bohnen, J. M. (2003). Privacy of patients' information in hospital lifts: observational study. BMJ 327: 1024–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
W v. Edgell 1 All ER 835. High Court ([1990]).
World Medical Association (1949). International Code of Ethics. Washington, DC: World Medical Association (http://www.wma.net/e/policy/c8.htm).Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Confidentiality
  • Edited by Peter A. Singer, University of Toronto, A. M. Viens, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics
  • Online publication: 30 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545566.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Confidentiality
  • Edited by Peter A. Singer, University of Toronto, A. M. Viens, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics
  • Online publication: 30 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545566.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Confidentiality
  • Edited by Peter A. Singer, University of Toronto, A. M. Viens, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics
  • Online publication: 30 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545566.008
Available formats
×