Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T05:58:05.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecologic Laparoscopy

from PART II - INFERTILITY EVALUATION AND TREATMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Botros R. M. B. Rizk
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama
Juan A. Garcia-Velasco
Affiliation:
Rey Juan Carlos University School of Medicine,
Hassan N. Sallam
Affiliation:
University of Alexandria School of Medicine
Antonis Makrigiannakis
Affiliation:
University of Crete
Get access

Summary

SYNOPSIS

The use of laparoscopy by gynecologists in treating pediatric and adolescent patients is a relatively new phenomenon. We present the specialized instrumentation prerequisite to operating on patients in the pediatric-adolescent age-group. Preoperative considerations and generalized techniques unique to this population are discussed. Though laparoscopy has a myriad of indications, the main focus will be on treatment and diagnosis of pelvic pain, adnexal masses, and pelvic inflammatory disease. A discussion of incidental appendectomy in these patients will also be presented.

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic surgery dates back to the Babylonian Talmud (Niddah Treatise, Section 65b). A lead funnel with a bent mouthpiece was introduced into the vagina, enabling direct visualization of the cervix. The first true laparoscopic procedure is credited to Ott in 1901, when he inserted a speculum through a small incision and, using a head mirror to focus light through the incision, inspected the abdominal viscera. Since that time, advances in the field have allowed surgeons to perform ever more complicated and intricate procedures. Of all the fields of surgery to benefit from laparoscopy, pediatric surgery is considered the newcomer. It was not until the production of high-quality, miniaturized instrumentation that surgeons began to look for applications of laparoscopy in the pediatric patient population. Few procedures were performed laparoscopically in this age-group before 1970 mainly because attempts at making smaller scopes resulted in unacceptable poor visualization.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwala, N, Liu, CY. Laparoscopic appendectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10(2):166–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almeida, OD, Val-Gallas, JM, Rizk, B. Appendectomy under local anesthesia following conscious pain mapping: a report of two cases. Hum Reprod 1998;13(3): 588–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AlSalilli, M, Vilos, GA. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic appendectomy in women with chronic right lower quadrant pain. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995;2(2):139–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, D. Sonographic differentiation of benign versus malignant adnexal masses. UpToDate, 2004.Google Scholar
Cope, JU, Askling, J, Gridley, G, et al. Appendectomy during childhood and adolescence and the subsequent risk of cancer in Sweden. Pediatrics 2003;111(6 Pt 1):1343–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Droegemueller, W. Infections of the upper genital tract. In: Stenchever, MA, Droegemueller, W, Herbst, AL, Mishell, DR Jr., eds. Comprehensive Gynecology. 4 edn. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001: 707–40.Google Scholar
Gidwani, GP. Chronic pelvic pain: steps to take before and after operative intervention. In: Pokorny, SF, ed. Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1996:41–53.Google Scholar
Hertzmann, P. Instrumentation for endoscopic surgery. In: Lobe, T, ed. Pediatric Laparoscopy and Thoracoscopy. Philedelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1994:6–16.Google Scholar
Kraemer, M, Ohmann, C, Leppert, R, Yang, Q. Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable. Surgical Endoscopy 2000;14(7):625–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laufer, MR, Goldstein, DP. Dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and the premenstrual syndrome. In: Emans, SJ, Laufer, MR, Goldstein, DP, eds. Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Philedelphia: Lippincott- Raven; 1998:363–410.Google Scholar
Lyons, TL, Winer, WK, Woo, A. Appendectomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for pelvic pain. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001;8(4):542–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McVay, JR. The appendix in relation to neoplastic disease. Cancer 1964;17:929–37.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellemkjaer, L, Johansen, C, Linet, MS, Gridley, G, Olsen, JH. Cancer risk following appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Cancer Causes Control 1998;9(2):183–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moertel, CG, Nobrega, FT, Elveback, LR, Wentz, JR. A prospective study of appendectomy and predisposition to cancer. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974;138(4):549–53.Google Scholar
OMalley, VP, Finch, DR, Powley, PH. Wound sepsis after cholecystectomy. Influence of incidental appendectomy. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986;8(4):435–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittaway, . Appendectomy in the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61(4):421–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Reese, KA, Reddy, S, Rock, JA. Endometriosis in an adolescent population: the Emory experience. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 1996;9(9):125–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanfilippo, JS, Schroeder, B. Pelvic pain in children and adolescents. In: Carpenter, SEK, Rock, JA, eds. Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2000:287–9.Google Scholar
Schroeder, B, Sanfilippo, JS. Chronic pelvic pain—medical and surgical approaches. In: Sanfilippo, JS, Muram, D, Dewhurst, CJ, Lee, PA, eds. Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2001:640–9.Google Scholar
Schropp, K. History of pediatric laparoscopy and thoracoscopy. In: Lobe, T, ed. Pediatric Laparoscopy and Thoracoscopy. Philedelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1994:1–5.Google Scholar
Strom, PR, Turkleson, ML, Stone, HH. Safety of incidental appendectomy. Am J Surg 1983;145(6):819–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Templeman, C, Fallat, M, Blinchevsky, A, Hertweck, S. Noninflammatory ovarian masses in girls and young women. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96(2):229–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H. Endometriosis invading the bladder removed from a patient who had never menstruated. Proc R Soc Med 19251926; 19:15.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×