Extra-legality and the ethic of political responsibility

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511552021.004

3 - Extra-legality and the ethic of political responsibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 August 2009

Oren Gross

Edited by

Victor V. Ramraj

Show author details

Victor V. Ramraj: Affiliation:
National University of Singapore

Book contents

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Summary

Whoever wants to engage in politics at all, and especially in politics as a vocation … lets himself in for the diabolic forces lurking in all violence.

Would not the burden on the official be so great that it would require circumstances of a perfectly extraordinary character to induce the individual to take the risk of acting? The answer is of course yes, that's the point.

Introduction

Public officials, like everybody else, ought to obey the law, even when they disagree with specific legal commands. However, there may be extreme exigencies when officials may regard strict obedience to legal authority as irrational or immoral. Public officials who believe that the law is so fundamentally unjust as to be devoid of both legitimacy and legality may exercise their discretion and refuse to apply, or seek actively to undermine, such law. The extra-legal measures model of emergency powers (ELM) invokes the possibility that public officials having to deal with extreme cases may consider acting outside the legal order while acknowledging openly their actions and the extra-legal nature of such actions and accepting the possible consequences. ELM has been challenged as embracing brazen lawlessness by placing public officials in a ‘legal black hole…a zone uncontrolled by law’. This chapter begins to address some of those criticisms.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Emergencies and the Limits of Legality , pp. 60 - 94

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511552021.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

References

Weber, M., ‘Politics as a Vocation’ in Gerth, H.H. and Mills, C.W. (eds. and trans.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1946), p. 77 at 125Google Scholar

Kadish, S.H., ‘Torture, the State and the Individual’ (1989) 23 Israel Law Review345 at 355Google Scholar

Gross, O., ‘Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Violent Crises Always Be Constitutional?’ (2003) Yale L.J. 1011 at 1096–133Google Scholar

Gross, O. and Aoláin, F. Ní, Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 110–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘The State of Emergency in Legal Theory’ in Ramraj, V.V., Hor, M. and Roach, K. (eds.), Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), p. 65CrossRef Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 50 (emphasis added)CrossRef Google Scholar

Steyn, J., ‘Guantánamo Bay: The Legal Black Hole’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly1CrossRef Google Scholar

Agamben, G., State of Exception (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), p. 48 (emphasis added)Google Scholar

Schauer, F., Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 128Google Scholar

Hurd, H.M., ‘Challenging Authority’ (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 1611 at 1625–8CrossRef Google Scholar

Schauer, F., ‘The Questions of Authority’ (1992) 81 Georgetown Law Journal 95 at 110–15Google Scholar

Franck, T.M., Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 174–91Google Scholar

Kremnitzer, M., ‘The Case of the Security Services Pardon’ (1987) 12 Iyunei Mishpat595Google Scholar

Lahav, P., ‘A Barrel Without Hoops: The Impact of Counterterrorism on Israel's Legal Culture’ (1988) 10 Cardozo Law Review 529 at 547–56Google Scholar

Gutman, Y., Taltelah ba-Shabak: ha-yoets ha-mishpati neged ha-memshalah mi-parashat Tovyanski ad parashat Kav 300 (A Storm in the G.S.S.) (Tel Aviv: Yediot Aharonot, 1995), pp. 15–133Google Scholar

Gross, O., ‘Are Torture Warrants Warranted? Pragmatic Absolutism and Official Disobedience’ (2004) 88 Minnesota Law Review 1481 at 1523–4Google Scholar

Amar, A.R., The Constitution and Criminal Procedure: First Principles (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997), p. 40Google Scholar

Fallon, Jr. R.H. and Meltzer, D.J., ‘New Law, Non-Retroactivity and Constitutional Remedies’ (1991) 104 Harvard Law Review 1733 at 1822CrossRef Google Scholar

Pillard, C.T.L., ‘Taking Fiction Seriously: The Strange Results of Public Officials’ Individual Liability Under Bivens’ (1999) 88 Georgetown Law Journal 65 at 66 and 76–7Google Scholar

Byrd, J.M., ‘Rejecting Absolute Immunity for Federal Officials’ (1983) 71 California Law Review 1707 at 1718–21CrossRef Google Scholar

Jeffries, J.C., Jr, ‘In Praise of the Eleventh Amendment and Section 1983’ (1998) 84 Virginia Law Review 47 at 51CrossRef Google Scholar

Dicey, A.V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 8th edn (Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1982), p. 272Google Scholar

Gross, O., ‘Stability and Flexibility: A Dicey Business’, in Ramraj, Hor and Roach, (eds.), Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy, p. 90

Froomkin, A.M., ‘The Metaphor Is the Key: Cryptography, the Clipper Chip and the Constitution’ (1995) 143 University of Pennsylvania Law Review709 at 746 n. 153CrossRef Google Scholar

Posner, R.A., Catastrophe: Risk and Response (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 241Google Scholar

Walzer, M., Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 3rd edn (New York: Basic Books, 2000), p. 325 (emphasis added)Google Scholar

Rostow, E.V., ‘The Japanese American Cases – a Disaster’ (1945) 54 Yale Law Journal 489 at 533CrossRef Google Scholar

Mayer, J., ‘Outsourcing Torture’ The New Yorker (14 February 2005)Google Scholar

Hardy, E.G., The Catilinarian Conspiracy in Its Context: A Re-study of the Evidence (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1924)Google Scholar

Sallust, , The Jugurthine War and the Conspiracy of Catiline, Handford, S.A. (trans.) (Baltimore: Penguin, 1963), pp. 175–233Google Scholar

Cary, M. and Scullard, H.H., A History of Rome Down to the Reign of Constantine, 3rd edn (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1975), pp. 246–7Google Scholar

Cicero, M.T., ‘In Catilinam IV’ in Cicero: Political Speeches, Berry, D.H. (trans.) (Oxford University Press, 2006), § 11–12, p. 193 at 197–8Google Scholar

Holland, T., Rubicon: The Triumph and Tragedy of the Roman Republic (London: Abacus, 2003), pp. 238–40Google Scholar

Lobel, J., ‘Emergency Power and the Decline of Liberalism’ (1989) 98 Yale Law Journal 1385 at 1390–97CrossRef Google Scholar

Parry, J.T. and White, W.S., ‘Interrogating Suspected Terrorists: Should Torture Be an Option?’ (2002) 63 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 743 at 764–5Google Scholar

Levinson, S., ‘“Precommitment” and “Postcommitment”: The Ban on Torture in the Wake of September 11’ (2003) 81 Texas Law Review 2013 at 2045–8Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘The State of Emergency in Legal Theory’ in Ramraj, Hor and Roach, (eds.), Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy, p. 65 at 72–3

Monaghan, H.P., ‘The Protective Power of the Presidency’ (1993) 93 Columbia Law Review 1 at 26CrossRef Google Scholar

Dan-Cohen, M., ‘Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law’ (1984) 97 Harvard Law Review 625 at 636–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Sheleff, L., ‘On Criminal Homicide and Legal Self Defense’ (1997) 6 Plilim 89 at 111–12Google Scholar

Kamisar, Y., ‘Physician Assisted Suicide: The Problems Presented by the Compelling, Heartwrenching Case’ (1998) 88 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 1121 at 1143–4CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Goldsmith, J., The Terror Presidency: Law and Judgment Inside the Bush administration (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2007), p. 61Google Scholar

Bonnefoy, P. and Barrionuevo, A., ‘Chilean Court Orders Arrests of Pinochet's Kin and Close Allies’ New York Times (5 October 2007), p. A5Google Scholar

Romero, S., ‘Living in Exile Isn't What it Used to be’ New York Times (7 Oct. 2007), p. 416Google Scholar

Ratner, S. and Abrams, J., Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law: Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Cassese, A., International Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Kadish, S.H., ‘Torture, the State and the Individual’ (1989) 23 Israel Law Review 345 at 355Google Scholar

Ford, , Thomas Jefferson (New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1986), p. 1231 at 1233Google Scholar

Reichman, A., ‘“When We Sit to Judge We Are Being Judged”: The Israeli GSS Case, Ex Parte Pinochet and Domestic/Global Deliberation’ (2001) 9 Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law 41 at 67–8Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘The State of Emergency in Legal Theory’ in Ramraj, Hor and Roach, (eds.), Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy, p. 65

Weber, , ‘Politics as Vocation’, in Gerth, and Mills, , From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, p. 121

Dodge, G.H., Benjamin Constant's Philosophy of Liberalism: A Study in Politics and Religion 101 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980)Google Scholar

Negretto, G.L. and Rivera, J.A.A., ‘Liberalism and Emergency Powers in Latin America: Reflections on Carl Schmitt and the Theory of Constitutional Dictatorship’ (2000) 21 Cardozo L. Rev. 1797 at 1800–03Google Scholar

Kadish, M.R. and Kadish, S.H., Discretion To Disobey: A Study of Lawful Departures from Legal Rules (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1973), pp. 5–12Google Scholar

Rossiter, C.L., Constitutional Dictatorship: Crisis Government in Modern Democracies (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1948), pp. 240–55Google Scholar

Koh, H.H., The National Security Constitution: Sharing Power after the Iran-Contra Affair (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990), pp. 117–23Google Scholar

Tushnet, M., ‘Controlling Executive Power in the War on Terrorism’ (2005) 118 Harvard Law Review 2673 at 2677Google Scholar

Ackerman, B., We the People: Foundations (Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1991), pp. 320–1Google Scholar

Ely, J.H., Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980), pp. 135–79Google Scholar

Hand, L., The Spirit of Liberty: Papers and Addresses of Learned Hand, Dillard, I. (ed.) (New York: Legal Classics Library, 1989), pp. 189–90Google Scholar

Gunther, G., Learned Hand: The Man and the Judge (New York: Knopf, 1994), pp.547–52 and 639–43Google Scholar

Friedrich, C.J., Constitutional Government and Democracy: Theory and Practice in Europe and America, 4th edn (Waltham: Blaisdell Publishing Co., 1968), p. 570Google Scholar

Scheuerman, W.E., ‘Emergency Powers’ (2006) 2 Annual Review of Law and Social Science257CrossRef Google Scholar

Ackerman, B., ‘The Emergency Constitution’ (2004) 113 Yale Law Journal 1029 at 1047–49CrossRef Google Scholar

Scheuerman, W.E., ‘Rethinking Crisis Government’ in Sherman, D. and Nardin, T. (eds.), Terror, Culture, Politics: Rethinking 9/11 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006), p. 214Google Scholar

Scheuerman, W.E., ‘Emergency Powers and the Rule of Law After 9/11’ (2006) 14 Journal of Political Philosophy61CrossRef Google Scholar

Rossiter, C. (ed.), The Federalist Papers, No. 23 (New York: New American Library, 1961), p. 153 (Alexander Hamilton)

Hatchard, J., Individual Freedoms and State Security in the African Context: The Case of Zimbabwe (Harare: Baobab Books, 1993), p. 2Google Scholar

Lee, H.P., Emergency Powers (Sydney: Law Book Co., 1984), p. 5Google Scholar

Rossiter, C. (ed.), The Federalist Papers, No. 49 (New York: New American Library, 1961), p. 315 (James Madison)

Popper, K.R., The Open Society and Its Enemies, 5th edn (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971), vol. I, pp. 43 and 198Google Scholar

Quarantelli, E.L. and Dynes, R.R., ‘Community Conflict: Its Absence and Its Presence in Natural Disasters’ (1976) 1 Mass Emergencies139 at 140 and 145Google Scholar

Russett, B., Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990), p. 34CrossRef Google Scholar

Barzilai, G., A Democracy in Wartime: Conflict and Consensus in Israel (Tel Aviv: Sifriyat Poalim, 1992), pp. 248–60Google Scholar

Posner, E.A. and Vermeule, A., Terror in the Balance: Security, Liberty and the Courts (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 168Google Scholar

Roach, K., ‘The Dangers of a Charter-Proof and Crime-Based Response to Terrorism’, in Daniels, R.J., Macklem, P. and Roach, K. (eds.), The Security of Freedom: Essays on Canada's Antiterrorism Bill (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001), pp. 131 and 138–42Google Scholar

Hussain, N., ‘Beyond Norm and Exception: Guantánamo’ (2007) 33 Critical Inquiry734 at 751CrossRef Google Scholar

Putnam, R.D., ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games’ (1988) 42 International Organizations427CrossRef Google Scholar

Eisgruber, C.L., ‘The Most Competent Branches: A Response to Professor Paulsen’ (1994) 83 Georgetown Law Journal347 at 360Google Scholar

Schauer, F., ‘Giving Reasons’ (1995) 47 Stanford Law Review633 at 656–7CrossRef Google Scholar

Bessette, and Tulis, , ‘Constitution, Politics and Presidency’, 10

Shapiro, D.L., ‘In Defense of Judicial Candor’ (1987) 100 Harvard Law Review731 at 737CrossRef Google Scholar

Adler, D.G., ‘The Steel Seizure Case and Inherent Presidential Power’ (2002) 19 Constitutional Commentary155 at 174–5Google Scholar

Colvin, John B. (20 September 1810), in Ford, P.L. (ed.), The Writings of Thomas Jefferson (New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1986) p. 1231 at 1233Google Scholar

Pollock, F., ‘What is Martial Law?’ (1902) 70 Law Quarterly Review152 at 156Google Scholar

Rousseau, J., The Social Contract and Discourses, Cole, G.D.H. (trans.) (New York: Everyman Library, 1993), pp. 295–6Google Scholar

Walzer, M., ‘Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands’ in Cohen, M., Nagel, T. and Scanlon, T. (eds.), War and Moral Responsibility (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974), p. 62 at 81Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.