Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Background
- Part II Rethinking the comprehension approach
- Part III Process, not product
- Part IV A process view of listening
- Part V The challenge of the real world
- Part VI Conclusion
- Appendices
- Glossary of listening-related terms
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 October 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Background
- Part II Rethinking the comprehension approach
- Part III Process, not product
- Part IV A process view of listening
- Part V The challenge of the real world
- Part VI Conclusion
- Appendices
- Glossary of listening-related terms
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Listening in the Language Classroom , pp. 353 - 359Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
(1984) ‘Reading in a foreign language: a reading problem or a language problem?’ In and (eds.), Reading in a Foreign Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1990) Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Ship or Sheep?: An Intermediate Pronunciation Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and . (1987) ‘Competition, variation and language learning’. In (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 157–94.Google Scholar
(1999) Slips of the Ear: Errors in the Perception of Casual Conversation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
, , , and (1993) ‘Ways of achieving understanding’. In (ed.), Adult Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–95.Google Scholar
(1986) ‘Investigating listening comprehension in context’. Applied Linguistics, 7/3: 284–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Speakers, Listeners and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) ‘Second language listening’. Entry in (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
(1990) ‘The testing of second language listening comprehension’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
(1981) ‘Integrating skills’. In and (eds.), Communication in the Classroom. London: Longman, pp. 108–14.Google Scholar
and (eds.) (1990) Reading and its Development: Component Skills Approaches. San Diego: Academic Press.
(2003) ‘Streaming speech BI: listening and pronunciation (British and Irish voices)’. At www.speechinaction.com/streamingspeech_course_menu.htm.
and (1986) ‘The effect of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures’. Applied Linguistics, 7: 113–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) (2007) Language Learner Strategies: Thirty Years of Research and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
and (1995) Cambridge Skills for Fluency: Listening 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1983) ‘Strategies of communication’. In and (eds.), Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. London: Longman, pp. 15–19.Google Scholar
CRAPEL (1999) ‘Un outil multimédia pour apprendre les langues étrangères’. (J-M. Debaisieux and O. Régent). Downloadable from: www.univ-nancy2.fr/CRAPEL/publications_melanges_24.htm.
(1990) ‘Exploiting prosodic probabilities’. In (ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books, pp. 105–21.Google Scholar
(1997) ‘The comparative perspective on spoken-language processing’. Speech Communication, 21: 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Learner evaluation of a ten-session intensive listening programme’. Paper presented at BAAL/CUP seminar ‘Research perspectives on listening in L1 and L2 education’, University of Warwick, UK, 12–13 May 2006.Google Scholar
and (1991) Cambridge Skills for Fluency: Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1995) ‘On the teachability of communication strategies’. TESOL Quarterly, 29/1: 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997) ‘Communication strategies in a second language: definitions and taxonomies’. Language Learning, 447/1: 173–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972) ‘Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversation’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23: 282–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1983) ‘Plans and strategies in foreign language communication’. In and (eds.), Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. London: Longman, pp. 20–60.Google Scholar
(1998) ‘Skills and strategies: towards a new methodology for listening’. ELT Journal, 54/2: 110–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) ‘Key concepts in ELT: bottom up and top down’. ELT Journal, 53/4: 338–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘“Not waving but drowning”: a reply to Tony Ridgway’. ELT Journal, 54/2: 186–95. Also: 54/3: 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001a) ‘The changing face of listening’. In and (eds.), Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 242–7.Google Scholar
(2001b) ‘Lexical segmentation in first and foreign language listening’. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
(2003) ‘Promoting perception: lexical segmentation in L2 listening’. ELT Journal, 57/4: 325–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘An insight into listeners’ problems: too much bottom-up or too much top-down?' System, 32: 363–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005a) ‘Intelligibility and the listener: the role of lexical stress’. TESOL Quarterly, 39/3: 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005b) ‘“A bird in the hand”: first mention and the second language listener’. Paper presented at BAAL Annual Meeting, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
(2008a) ‘Revising segmentation hypotheses in first and second language listening’. System, 36: 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008b) ‘Bricks and mortar: how does a second language listener process input?’ Tesol Quarterly, 42/3.Google Scholar
(2008c) ‘The L2 listener: type or individual?’ Working Papers in English and Applied Linguistics in Honour of Gillian Brown. Cambridge: RCEAL.Google Scholar
and (1999) Establishing Self-Access: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1997) ‘Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners’. ELT Journal, 51: 361–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems'. System, 28: 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006) ‘Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners’. ELT Journal, 60/3: 222–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1967) ‘Reading: a psycholinguistic guessing game’. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6: 126–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective'. System, 34/2: 165–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1987) ‘Prosodic structure and spoken word recognition’. Cognition, 25: 135–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1994) ‘Evaluating lecture comprehension’. In (ed.), Academic Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 241–68.Google Scholar
(1985) ‘On autonomy: some elementary concepts’. In (ed.), Discourse and Learning. Harlow: Longman, pp. 173–90.Google Scholar
(1991) ‘Lexical ignorance: the main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language learners’. IRAL, 29 (2): 135–49.Google Scholar
(1987) Word Recognition in Foreign and Native Language: Effects of Context and Assimilation. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
(1989) ‘Second language listening comprehension: a schema-theoretic perspective’. Modern Language Journal, 73: 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990) ‘What you don't know can't help you’. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12: 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990) ‘A taxonomy for teaching second language listening’. Foreign Language Annals, 23/2: 105–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) ‘A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension’. Modern Language Journal, 75: 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) ‘The development of interactive listening strategies in second language academic situations’. In and (eds.), A Guide to the Teaching of Second Language Listening. San Diego, CA: Dominie Press, pp. 166–85.Google Scholar
(2006) ‘Academic listening: marrying top and bottom’. In and (eds.), Current Trends in Learning and Teaching the Four Skills within a Communicative Framework. Amsterdam: Mouton, pp. 99–101.Google Scholar
(2001) Learning Strategies in Foreign and Second Language Classrooms. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2006) ‘Academic listening: morning top and bottom’. In and (eds.), Current Trends in Learning and Teaching the Four Skills within a Communicative Framework. Amsterdam: Mouton, pp. 99–101.Google Scholar
(2002) Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
(1997) ‘Towards a new approach to modelling vocabulary acquisition’. In and (eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–21.Google Scholar
(1994) Learning to Listen: A Strategy-Based Approach for the Second-Language Learner. San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.Google Scholar
, , and (1979) ‘Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously?’ Cognition, 50: 323–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989) ‘Using news broadcasts for authentic listening comprehension’. ELT Journal, 43/1: 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977) ‘Authentic texts in ESP’. In (ed.), English for Specific Purposes. London: Modern English Publications, pp. 13–17.Google Scholar
(1977) ‘Dictation as a test of listening comprehension’. In (ed.), Listening Comprehension in Foreign Language Teaching. Kronberg: Scriptor.Google Scholar
and (1988) ‘How to teach learning strategies’. In , and (eds.), The Cognitive Academic Learning Approach (CALLA) Training Manual. Arlington, VA: Second Language Learning, pp. 121–2.Google Scholar
and (1990) Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘What strategy do less proficient learners employ in listening comprehension? A reappraisal of bottom-up and top-down processing’. Journal of the Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 5: 73–90.Google Scholar
(1990) Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
(1922) The Principles of Language Study. London: Harrap. Reprinted Oxford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
and (1983) ‘Two puzzles for linguistic theory’. In and (eds.), Language and Communication. London: Longman, pp. 191–226.Google Scholar
, , and (2001) ‘Approaches to advising for self-directed learning’. In (ed.), Learner Automony: New Insights. AILA Review, 15: 16–25.Google Scholar
and (1981) ‘Some of the interactive processes in reading and their role in the reading skill’. In and (eds.), Interactive Processes in Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 269– 97.Google Scholar
(1990) The Use of Compensatory Strategies by Dutch Learners of English. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘Success with extensive listening’. Cambridge University Press website at: www.cambridge.org/elt/readers/teacher/articles/current4.htmGoogle Scholar
(1983) ‘Listening comprehension: approach, design, procedure’. TESOL Quarterly, 17: 219–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3rd edn.Google Scholar
(1987) ‘Listening comprehension: teaching or testing?’ ELT Journal, 41/2: 126–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990) ‘Oral examinations: an historical note’. Language Testing, 7/2: 158–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980) ‘Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency’. Reading Research Quarterly, 16: 32–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) ‘Recognizing words in continuous speech: how important are word-final consonants?’ ELT Journal, 47/3: 211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Real lives, real listening’. London: The Listening Business. At: www.thelisteningbusiness.com.Google Scholar
and (1998) ‘Bottom-up or top-down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening performance’. Applied Linguistics, 19: 432–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998) Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
(1997) ‘The Cinderella of communication strategies: reception strategies in interactive listening’. Modern Language Journal, 81/4: 494–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) ‘Facilitating second language listening comprehension: acquiring successful strategies’. ELT Journal, 53/4: 73–8.Google Scholar
(2003) ‘Orchestrating strategy use: toward a model of the skilled second language listener’. Language Learning, 53: 463–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘Listening to learn or learning to listen?’ Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24: 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1999) ‘One-to-one counselling for autonomous 24 learning in a self-access centre: final report on action learning project’. In and (eds.), Learner Autonomy in Language Learning: Defining the Field and Effecting Change. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 111–26.Google Scholar
(2005) Language Testing and Validation: An Evidence Based Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1985) ‘Foreigner talk in the university classroom’. In and (eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 89–114.Google Scholar
(2003) ‘Discovery listening – improving perceptual processing’. ELT Journal, 57/4: 335–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar