Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mwwwr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-12T07:17:39.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The study of hand movements during grasping. A historical perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2009

By
Marc Jeannerod
Edited by
Dennis A. Nowak  and
Joachim Hermsdörfer
Dennis A. Nowak
Affiliation:
Klinik Kipfenberg, Kipfenberg, Germany
Joachim Hermsdörfer
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich
Get access

Summary

Summary

A satisfactory description of human hand movements during the action of grasping was not available until the early 1980s. Kinematic parameters extracted from the displacements of anatomical landmarks located on the hand were used to differentiate between a transport component carrying the hand at the target location and a grasp component shaping the finger according to the object shape and size. These parameters, including the maximum grip aperture (MGA) are now currently adopted for testing vision for action in normal subjects, including in children at different stages of their visuomotor development, and in a wide range of pathological disorders affecting goal-directed movements.

Introduction: hand grasping movements before 1980

The hand is both a sensory and a motor organ. On the sensory side, in Sherrington's terms, it is the fovea of the somesthetic system, to the same extent as the center of the retina is the fovea of the visual system. The hand explores the haptic world by touching, grasping and manipulating objects in the same way as eye movements explore the visual world by displacing the retina between fixation points. The sensory and motor functions of the hand are complementary with one another. The movements of the fingers contribute to the exploration and perception of object shape and texture during manipulation and conversely sensory cues arising from the skin receptors contribute to the control of hand movements.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Sensorimotor Control of Grasping
Physiology and Pathophysiology
 , pp. 127 - 140
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arbib, M. A. (1981). Perceptual structures and distributed motor control. In Brooks, V. B. (Ed.), Handbook of Physiology, Section I: The Nervous System, Vol. 2: Motor Control (pp. 1449–1480). Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J. L. (1997). Human Evolution. A Neuropsychological Perspective. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Brinkman, J. & Kuypers, H. G. J. M. (1972). Split-brain monkeys: cerebral control of ipsilateral and contralateral arm, hand and finger movements. Science, 176, 536–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castiello, U. (1997). Arm and mouth coordination during the eating action in humans. A kinematic analysis. Experimental Brain Research, 115, 552–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christel, M. (1993). Grasping techniques and hand preferences in Hominoidea. In Preuschoft, H. & Chivers, D. J. (Eds.), Hands of Primates (pp. 91–108). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faugier-Grimaud, S., Frenois, C. & Stein, D. G. (1978). Effects of posterior parietal lesions on visually guided behavior in monkeys. Neuropsychologia, 16, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haaxma, R. & Kuypers, H. G. J. M. (1975). Intrahemispheric cortical connections and visual guidance of hand and finger movements in the rhesus monkey. Brain, 98, 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingle, D. J. (1967). Two visual mechanisms underlying the behavior of fish. Psychologische Forschung, 31, 44–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In Long, J. & Baddeley, A. (Eds.), Attention and Performance IX (pp. 153–168). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. J Motor Behaviour, 16, 235–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeannerod, M. (1988). The Neural and Behavioural Organization of Goal-directed Movements. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. & Biguer, B. (1982). Visuomotor mechanisms in reaching within extrapersonal space. In Ingle, D., Goodale, M. A. & Mansfield, R. (Eds.), Advances in the Analysis of Visual Behavior (pp. 387–409). Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M., Decety, J. & Michel, F. (1994). Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neuropsychologia, 32, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansson, R. S. & Westling, G. (1984). Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res, 56, 550–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, B. G., Deich, J. D. & Zeigler, H. P. (1985). Grasping in the pigeon (Columba livia): final common path mechanism. Behav Brain Res, 18, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, D. G. & Kuypers, H. G. J. M. (1968). The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. I. The effects of bilateral pyramidal lesions. Brain, 91, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marteniuk, R. G., Leavitt, J. L., MacKenzie, C. L., & Athenes, S. (1990). Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum Move Sci, 9, 149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, A. D. & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mountcastle, V. B. (2005). The Sensory Hand. Neural Mechanisms of Somatic Sensation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mountcastle, V. B., Lynch, J. C., Georgopoulos, A.Sakata, H. & Acuna, C. (1975). Posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey: command functions for operations within extra-personal space. J Neurophysiol, 38, 871–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napier, J. R. (1956). The prehensile movements of the human hand. J Bone Joint Surg, 38B, 902–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napier, J. R. (1960). Studies of the hands of living primates. Proc Zoo Soc Lond, 134, 647–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paillard, J. & Beaubaton, D. (1974). Problèmes posés par les contrôles moteurs ipsilatéraux après déconnexion hémisphérique chez le singe. In Michel, F. & Schott, B. (Eds.), Les Syndromes de Disconnexion Calleuse chez l'Homme (pp. 137–171). Lyon, France: Hôpital Neurologique.Google Scholar
Paulignan, Y., MacKenzie, C., Marteniuk, R. & Jeannerod, M. (1991a). Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. I. The effects of changing object position. Exp Brain Res, 83, 502–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulignan, Y., Jeannerod, M., MacKenzie, C. & Marteniuk, R. (1991b). Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size. Exp Brain Res, 87, 407–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, C. G. (1986). Movements of the Hand. The Sherrington Lecture XVII. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Meunier, M. & Boussaoud, D. (2002). Prehension movements in the macaque monkey. Effect of object size and location. J Neurophysiol, 88, 1491–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinozzi, G., Truppa, V. & Lagana, T. (2004). Grasping behaviour in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus paella). Grip types and manual laterality for picking up a small food item. Am J Phys Anthropol, 125, 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevarthen, C. B. (1968). Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psych Forsch, 31, 299–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ungerleider, L. & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In Ingle, D. J., Goodale, M. A. & Mansfield, R. J. W. (Eds.), Advances in the Analysis of Visual Behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×