Abraham, Nicolas. Rhythms: On the Work, Translation, and Psychoanalysis. Translated by Benjamin Thigpen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Alaimo, Stacy. Undomesticated Ground: Recasting Nature as Feminist Space. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry. Kant's Transcendental Idealism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Allwood, Gill. French Feminisms: Gender and Violence in Contemporary Theory. London: UCL Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Ansell-Pearson, Keith. An Introduction to Nietzsche as Political Thinker: The Perfect Nihilist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armour, Ellen T.Deconstruction, Theology and the Problem of Difference: Subverting the Race/Gender Divide. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Bachelard, Gaston. The Dialectic of Duration. 1950. Translated by Mary McAllester Jones. Manchester, U.K. : Clinamen Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Bachofen, Johann Jakob.Myth, Religion and Mother-Right. 1861. Translated by Ralph Manheim. London: Routledge, 1967.Google Scholar

Barad, Karen. ‘Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter’. Signs 28: 3 (2003): 801–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan, ed. Early Greek Philosophy. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987.Google Scholar

Battersby, Christine. The Phenomenal Woman: Feminist Metaphysics and the Patterns of Identity. Cambridge, U.K. : Polity Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick. ‘German Romanticism’. In The Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward, Craig. London and New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick. The Romantic Imperative. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla. ‘Subjectivity, Historiography, and Politics: Reflections on the “Feminism/Postmodernism Exchange”’. In Benhabib, ., Feminist Contentions. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Cornell,, Drucilla and Fraser, Nancy. Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. M.Introduction to Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics, edited by J. M. Bernstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Benveniste, Emile. Problems in General Linguistics. 1966. Translated by Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables, Fla.: University of Miami Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Bigwood, Carol. Earth Muse: Feminism, Nature, and Art. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Birke, Lynda. Feminism and the Biological Body. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Bloodsworth, Mary K. ‘Embodiment and Ambiguity: Luce Irigaray, Sexual Difference and “Race”’. International Studies in Philosophy 31: 2 (1999): 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bordo, Susan R.The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany: SUNY Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Boulous, Walker, Michelle.Philosophy and the Maternal Body: Reading Silence. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Bowie, Andrew. Schelling and Modern European Philosophy: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowie, Andrew. Introduction to German Philosophy: From Kant to Habermas. Cambridge, U.K. : Polity Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Braidotti, Rosi. ‘The Politics of Ontological Difference’. In Between Feminism and Psychoanalysis, edited by Teresa, Brennan. London: Routledge, 1989.

Braidotti, Rosi. Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. Translated by Elizabeth Guild. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Braidotti, Rosi. ‘Feminism by Any Other Name’. Interview with Judith Butler. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 6: 2 + 3 (1994): 27–61.Google Scholar

Braidotti, Rosi. ‘Sexual Difference Theory’. In A Companion to Feminist Philosophy, edited by Alison, M. Jaggar and Iris, Marion Young. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 1998.Google Scholar

Braidotti, Rosi. Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Braidotti, Rosi. ‘Becoming Woman: Or Sexual Difference Revisited’. Theory, Culture and Society 20: 3 (2003): 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bray, Abigail. ‘Not Woman Enough: Irigaray's Culture of Difference’. Feminist Theory 2: 3 (2001): 311–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, Carolyn, Schor, Naomi, and Whitford, Margaret, eds. Engaging with Irigaray: Feminist Philosophy and Modern European Thought. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. ‘Sex and Gender in Simone de Beauvoir's Second Sex’. Yale French Studies 72 (1986): 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Judith. ‘Foucault and the Paradox of Bodily Inscriptions’. Journal of Philosophy 86: 11 (1989): 601–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Judith. ‘Sexual Ideology and Phenomenological Description: A Feminist Critique of Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception’. In The Thinking Muse: Feminism and Modern French Philosophy, edited by Jeffner, Allen and Iris, Marion Young. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. ‘Sexual Difference as a Question of Ethics: Alterities of the Flesh in Irigaray and Merleau-Ponty’. In Bodies of Resistance: New Phenomenologies of Politics, Agency, and Culture, edited by Laura, Doyle. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. ‘Gender as Performance: An Interview with Judith Butler’. Interview with Peter Osborne and Lynne Segal. Radical Philosophy 67 (1994): 32–9.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. ‘Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory’. In Writing on the Body: Female Embodiment and Feminist Theory, edited by Katie, Conboy, Nadia, Medina, and Sarah, Stanbury. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. Anniversary Edition of Gender Trouble. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. Antigone's Claim. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. With Ernesto Laclau and Slavoj Žižek. London: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. Kritik der ethischen Gewalt. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2003.Google Scholar

Cavarero, Adriana. In Spite of Plato. 1990. Translated by Serena Anderlini-D'Onofrio and Áine O'Healy. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Chanter, Tina. Ethics of Eros: Irigaray's Rewriting of the Philosophers. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar

Chase, Cheryl et al. ‘Intersexual Rights’. Letters section, The Sciences (July/August 1993): 3–4.Google Scholar

Cheah, Pheng, and Grosz, Elizabeth. ‘Of Being-Two: Introduction’. Diacritics 28: 1 (1998): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chodorow, Nancy. The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Colebrook, Claire. Introduction to Deleuze and Feminist Theory, edited by Ian Buchanan and Claire Colebrook. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Colebrook, Claire. ‘From Radical Representations to Corporeal Becomings: The Feminist Philosophy of Lloyd, Grosz, and Gatens’. Hypatia 15: 2 (2000): 76–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornell, Drucilla. Transformations: Recollective Imagination and Sexual Difference. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Cornell, Drucilla. At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex, and Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dastur, Françoise. ‘Tragedy and Speculation’. In Philosophy and Tragedy, edited by Miguel, Beistegui and Simon, Sparks. London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar

De Lauretis, Teresa. ‘The Essence of the Triangle or, Taking the Risk of Essentialism Seriously: Feminist Theory in Italy, the U.S., and Britain’. In The Essential Difference, edited by Schor and Weed.

Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Brian Massumi. London: Athlone, 1988. Originally published as Mille Plateaux. Paris: Minuit, 1980.Google Scholar

Descartes, René. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. 2 vols. Translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Deutscher, Penelope. ‘French Feminist Philosophers on Law and Public Policy: Michèle le Doeuff and Luce Irigaray’. Australian Journal of French Studies 34: 1 (1997): 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutscher, Penelope. Yielding Gender: Feminism, Deconstruction and the History of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Deutscher, Penelope. A Politics of Impossible Difference: The Later Work of Luce Irigaray. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Di Giovanni, George. ‘Kant's Metaphysics of Nature and Schelling's Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (1979): 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Disch, Lisa. ‘Judith Butler and the Politics of the Performative’. Political Theory 27: 4 (1999): 545–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fausto-Sterling, Anne. ‘How Many Sexes Are There?’ New York Times March 12, 1993: A29.Google Scholar

Fausto-Sterling, Anne. ‘The Five Sexes, Revisited’. The Sciences (July/August 2000): 19–23.Google ScholarPubMed

Fausto-Sterling, Anne. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books, 2000.Google Scholar

Field, Terri. ‘Is the Body Essential for Ecofeminism?’ Organization and Environment 13: 1 (2000): 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fielding, Helen. ‘Questioning Nature: Irigaray, Heidegger and the Potentiality of Matter’. Continental Philosophy Review 36: 1 (2003): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality: Volume One. 1976. Translated by Robert Hurley. London: Allen Lane, 1979.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’. 1971. In Nietzsche, edited by John, Richardson and Brian, Leiter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. ‘False Antitheses: A Response to Seyla Benhabib and Judith Butler’. In Benhabib et al., Feminist Contentions.

Freud, Sigmund. On Metapsychology: The Theory of Psychoanalysis. Translated under the general editorship of James Strachey. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. Civilization, Society and Religion. Translated under the general editorship of James Strachey. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985.Google Scholar

Fuss, Diana. Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and Difference. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar

Gallop, Jane. ‘Quand nos lèvres s’écrivent: Irigaray's Body Politic'. Romanic Review 74: 1 (1983): 77–83.Google Scholar

Gardner, Sebastian. Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

Gatens, Moira. Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar

Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Glazebrook, Trish. ‘From Physis to Nature, Technē to Technology: Heidegger on Aristotle, Galileo, and Newton’. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (2000): 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Scientific Studies. Edited and translated by Douglas Miller. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Grosz, Elizabeth. Sexual Subversions: Three French Feminists. Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1989.Google Scholar

Grosz, Elizabeth. Jacques Lacan: A Feminist Introduction. London: Routledge, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grosz, Elizabeth. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Grosz, Elizabeth. Architecture from the Outside: Essays on Virtual and Real Space. London: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Grosz, Elizabeth. The Nick of Time: Politics, Evolution, and the Untimely.Durham: Duke University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grosz, Elizabeth. Time Travels: Feminism, Nature, Power.Durham: Duke University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammond, Michael, Howarth,, Jane and Keat, Russell. Understanding Phenomenology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna. ‘A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century’. In Haraway, , Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar

Hardimon, Michael. Hegel's Social Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harding, Sandra, and Hintikka, Merrill B., eds. Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: David Reidel, 1984.Google Scholar

Haslanger, Sally. ‘Feminism in Metaphysics: Negotiating the Natural’. In The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy, edited by Miranda, Fricker and Jennifer, Hornsby. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Hass, Marjorie. ‘The Style of the Speaking Subject: Irigaray's Empirical Studies of Language Production’. Hypatia 15: 1 (2000): 64–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayles, N. Katherine. ‘Gender Encoding in Fluid Mechanics: Masculine Channels and Feminine Flows’. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 4: 2 (1992): 16–44.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.Natural Law: The Scientific Ways of Treating Natural Law, Its Place in Moral Philosophy, and Its Relation to the Positive Sciences of Law. 1802–1803. Translated by T. M. Knox. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. Encyclopaedia Logic. Third edition, 1830. Translated by T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting, and H. S. Harris. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1991.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. Philosophy of Nature. 3 vols. Third edition, 1830. Edited and translated by M. J. Petry. London: Allen and Unwin, 1970.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. Philosophy of Mind. Third edition, 1830. Translated by A. V. Miller and William Wallace. Oxford: Clarendon, 1971.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Introduction to Metaphysics. 1935. Translated by Ralph Manheim. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Elucidations of Hölderlin's Poetry. Translated by Keith Hoeller. New York: Humanity Books, 2000. Published in German as Erläuterungen zu Hölderlins Dichtung. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1981.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. ‘On the Essence and Concept of Physis in Aristotle's Physics B, I’. 1939. Translated by Thomas Sheehan. In Pathmarks, edited by Will, McNeill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Published in German as ‘Vom Wesen und Begriff der Physis Aristoteles, Physik B, 1’. In Wegmarken. Gesamtausgabe, division 1, volume 9. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1996.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. ‘Modern Science, Metaphysics, and Mathematics’. 1962. In Basic Writings, edited by David, Farrell Krell. Second, revised, edition; London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Heinämaa, Sara. ‘What Is a Woman? Butler and Beauvoir on the Foundations of the Sexual Difference’. Hypatia 12: 1 (1997): 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heraclitus, . The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. Edited and translated by Charles Kahn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodge, Joanna. ‘Irigaray Reading Heidegger’. In Engaging with Irigaray, edited by Burke et al.

Hölderlin, Friedrich. ‘Being Judgement Possibility’. 1795. In Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics, edited by Bernstein, J. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Hölderlin, Friedrich. Hyperion and Selected Poems. Edited by Eric L. Santner. New York: Continuum, 1990.Google Scholar

Hölderlin, Friedrich. Poems and Fragments. Translated by Michael Hamburger. London: Anvil Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hölderlin, Friedrich. Essays and Letters on Theory. Translated by Thomas Pfau. Albany: SUNY Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Hölderlin, Friedrich. Sämtliche Werke und Briefe. 2 vols. Edited by Günter Mieth. Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag, 1970.Google Scholar

Huntingdon, Patricia. Ecstatic Subjects, Utopia, and Recognition. Albany: SUNY Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Huntingdon, Patricia. Introduction to Feminist Interpretations of Martin Heidegger, edited by Nancy J. Holland and Patricia Huntingdon. University Park, PA: Penn State Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Irigaray, Luce. ‘Women's Exile’. Translated by Couze Venn. Ideology and Consciousness 1 (1977): 62–76.Google Scholar

Irigaray, Luce. Marine Lover of Friedrich Nietzsche. 1980. Trans. Gillian C. Gill. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Irigaray, Luce. ‘Women-Mothers, the Silent Substratum of the Social Order’. 1981. In The Irigaray Reader, edited by Margaret, Whitford. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar

Irigaray, Luce. Elemental Passions. 1982. Translated by Joanne Collie and Judith Still. London: Athlone, 1992.Google Scholar

Irigaray, Luce. To Speak is Never Neutral. 1985. Translated by Gail Schwab. London: Continuum, 2002.Google Scholar

Irigaray, Luce. Interview with Elaine Hoffman Baruch and Lucienne J. Serrano. In Women Analyze Women, edited by Baruch, and Serrano, . New York: New York University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Irigaray, Luce. ‘From The Forgetting of Air to To Be Two’. In Feminist Interpretations of Martin Heidegger, edited by Nancy, J. Holland and Patricia, Huntingdon. University Park, PA: Penn State Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Irigaray, Luce. ‘Why Cultivate Difference?’ Paragraph 25: 3 (2002): 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irigaray, Luce. ‘Being Two, How Many Eyes Have We?’ Paragraph 25: 3 (2002): 143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irigaray, Luce. ‘Animal Compassion’. In Animal Philosophy, edited by Peter, Atterton and Matthew, Calarco. London: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar

Joy, Morny. ‘Love and the Labor of the Negative: Irigaray and Hegel’. In Resistance, Flight, Creation: Feminist Enactments of French Philosophy, edited by Dorothea, Olkowski. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. 1781; second edition, 1787. Translated by Norman Kemp Smith. Basingstoke: MacMillan, 1929.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgement. 1790. Translated by Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar

Keltner, Stacy. ‘The Ethics of Air: Technology and the Question of Sexual Difference’. Philosophy Today Suppl. 45:5 (2001): 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kessler, Suzanne. Lessons from the Intersexed. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Kirby, Vicki. Telling Flesh: The Substance of the Corporeal. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Krell, David Farrell. ‘Three Ends of the Absolute: Schelling on Inhibition, Hölderlin on Separation, and Novalis on Density’. Research in Phenomenology 32 (2002): 60–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. 1966. Translated by Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock, 1977.Google Scholar

Lacey, Nicola. Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart, 1998.Google Scholar

Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. Typography: Mimesis, Philosophy, Politics. Edited by Christopher Fynsk. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Lear, Jonathan. Aristotle: The Desire to Understand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lefebvre, Henri. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time, and Everyday Life. Translated by Stuart Elden and Gerald Moore. London: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar

Lennon, Kathleen. ‘Imaginary Bodies and Worlds’. Inquiry 47 (2004): 107–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, Genevieve. The Man of Reason. Second edition. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Genevieve, ed. Feminism and History of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. 1690. Edited by John W. Yolton. London: J. M. Dent, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lorrain, Tamsin. Irigaray and Deleuze: Experiments in Visceral Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Mairi. ‘Intersex and Gender Identity’. 2000. At: www.ukia.co.uk/voices/is_gi.htm

MacKinnon, Catherine. ‘Feminism, Marxism, Method and the State: An Agenda for Theory’. Signs 7 (1982): 515–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mader, Mary Beth. ‘All Too Familiar: Luce Irigaray's Recent Thoughts on Sexuation and Generation’. Continental Philosophy Review 36: 4 (2003): 367–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Alison. Luce Irigaray and the Question of the Divine. Leeds: Maney Publishing, 2000.Google Scholar

McNay, Lois. Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Nature: Course Notes from the Collège de France. Translated by Robert Vallier. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Miller, Elaine. The Vegetative Soul: From Philosophy of Nature to Subjectivity in the Feminine. Albany: SUNY Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Mills, Catherine. ‘Efficacy and Vulnerability: Judith Butler on Reiteration and Resistance’. Australian Feminist Studies 32 (2000): 265–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moi, Toril. Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. London: Methuen, 1985.Google Scholar

Moi, Toril. Simone de Beauvoir: The Making of an Intellectual Woman. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.Google Scholar

Murphy, Ann V. ‘The Enigma of the Natural in Irigaray’. Philosophy Today. Suppl. 45: 5 (2001): 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

New, Caroline. ‘Realism, Deconstruction, and the Feminist Standpoint’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 28: 4 (1998): 349–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicholson, Linda. ‘The Myth of the Traditional Family’. In Feminism and Families, edited by Hilde, Lindemann Nelson. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the Genealogy of Morality. 1887. Translated by Carol Diethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Published in German as Zur Genealogie der Moral. In Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Division 6, Volume 2, edited by Giorgio, Colli and Mazzino, Montinari. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1967–.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Will to Power. 1906. Translated by Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Random House, 1967.Google Scholar

Olkowski, Dorothea. ‘Materiality and Language: Butler's Interrogation of the History of Philosophy’. Philosophy and Social Criticism 23: 3 (1997): 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olkowski, Dorothea. Gilles Deleuze and the Ruin of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Olkowski, Dorothea. ‘The End of Phenomenology: Bergson's Interval in Irigaray’. Hypatia 15: 3 (2000): 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olkowski, Dorothea. ‘Morpho-logic in Deleuze and Irigaray’. In Deleuze and Feminist Theory, edited by Ian, Buchanan and Claire, Colebrook. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Patton, Paul, ed. Nietzsche, Feminism, and Political Theory. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Pinkard, Terry. Hegel's Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Plato, . Timaeus and Critias. Translated by Desmond Lee. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.Google Scholar

Plaza, Monique. ‘“Phallomorphic Power” and the Psychology of “Woman”’. Ideology and Consciousness 4 (1978): 5–36.Google Scholar

Poxon, Judith L. ‘Corporeality and Divinity: Irigaray and the Problem of the Ideal’. In Religion in French Feminist Thought: Critical Perspectives, edited by Morny, Joy, Kathleen, O'Grady, and Judith, L. Poxon. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar

Richardson, John. ‘Nietzsche's Power Ontology’. In Nietzsche, edited by John, Richardson and Brian, Leiter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Richards, Robert J.The Romantic Conception of Life. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. Translated by Denis Savage. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Riley, Denise. ‘Am I That Name?’: Feminism and the Category of ‘Women’ in History. London: Macmillan, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Jacqueline. ‘Introduction – II’. In Jacques Lacan, Feminine Sexuality, edited by Juliet, Mitchell and Jacqueline, Rose. New York: Norton, 1982.Google Scholar

Salih, Sara. Judith Butler. London: Routledge, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandford, Stella. ‘Feminism Against “The Feminine”’. Radical Philosophy 105 (2001): 6–14.Google Scholar

Sayer, Andrew. Realism and Social Science. London: Sage, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sayers, Janet. Sexual Contradictions: Psychology, Psychoanalysis, and Feminism. London: Tavistock, 1986.Google Scholar

Schelling, F. W. J. Von der Weltseele. Eine Hypothese der hÖhern physik zur Erklärung des allgemeinen Organismus. 1978. In Schelling, Werke: Historisch-kritische Ausgabe Reihe 1. Vol. 6, edited by JÖrg Jantzen. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 2000.

Schlegel, Friedrich. ‘Dialogue on Poetry’ (selections). Translated by Ernst Behler and Roman Struc. In German Romantic Criticism, edited by Leslie, A. Willson. New York: Continuum, 1982.Google Scholar

Schoenbohm, Susan. ‘Heidegger's Interpretation of Physis in Introduction to Metaphysics’. In A Companion to Heidegger's Introduction to Metaphysics, edited by Richard Polt and Gregory Fried. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Schor, Naomi. ‘Previous Engagements: The Receptions of Irigaray’. In Engaging with Irigaray, edited by Burke, .

Schor, Naomi. ‘This Essentialism Which Is Not One: Coming to Grips with Irigaray’. In Engaging with Irigaray, edited by Burke, .

Schor, Naomi. ‘French Feminism Is a Universalism’. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 7: 1 (1995): 14–47.Google Scholar

Schor, Naomi, and Weed, Elizabeth, eds. The Essential Difference. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Schrift, Alan. Nietzsche and the Question of Interpretation: Between Hermeneutics and Deconstruction. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar

Schutte, Ofelia. ‘A Critique of Normative Heterosexuality: Identity, Embodiment, and Sexual Difference in Beauvoir and Irigaray’. Hypatia 12: 1 (1997): 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwab, Gail. ‘Sexual Difference as Model: An Ethics for the Global Future’. Diacritics 28: 1 (1998): 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, Amartya. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Shildrick, Margrit. Leaky Bodies and Boundaries: Feminism, Postmodernism and (Bio)ethics. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Spelman, Elizabeth. Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. London: The Women's Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty.Outside in the Teaching Machine. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty.. ‘Feminism, Criticism and the Institution’. Thesis Eleven 10/11 (1984/5): 175–87.Google Scholar

Sturma, Dieter. ‘The Nature of Subjectivity: The Critical and Systematic Function of Schelling's Philosophy of Nature’. In The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel, edited by Sally, Sedgwick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Summers-Bremner, Eluned. ‘Reading Irigaray, Dancing’. Hypatia 15: 1 (2000): 90–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenning, Alkeline. ‘The Body as Crowbar: Transcending or Stretching Sex?’ Feminist Theory 5: 1 (2004): 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasseleu, Cathryn. Textures of Light: Vision and Touch in Irigaray, Levinas and Merleau-Ponty. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Vasterling, Veronica. ‘Butler's Sophisticated Constructionism’. Hypatia 14: 3 (1999): 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogel, Steven. ‘Nature as Origin and Difference: On Environmental Philosophy and Continental Thought’. Philosophy Today 42 Suppl. (1998): 169–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walsh, Lisa. ‘Her Mother Her Self: The Ethics of the Antigone Family Romance’. Hypatia 14: 3 (1999): 96–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warnke, Georgia. ‘Intersexuality and the Categories of Sex’. Hypatia 16: 3 (2001): 126–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webster, Fiona. ‘The Politics of Sex and Gender: Benhabib and Butler Debate Subjectivity’. Hypatia 15: 1 (2000): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weir, Allison. Sacrificial Logics: Feminist Theory and the Critique of Identity. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar

Weiss, Gail. Body Images: Embodiment as Intercorporeality. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

Whitford, Margaret. Luce Irigaray: Philosophy in the Feminine. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar

Whitford, Margaret. ‘Irigaray, Utopia and the Death Drive’. In Engaging with Irigaray, edited by Burke, .

Whitford, Margaret. ‘Reading Irigaray in the Nineties’. In Engaging with Irigaray, edited by Burke, .

Whitford, Margaret, ed. The Irigaray Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar

Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Revised, expanded, edition. London: Flamingo, 1983.Google Scholar

Wirth, Jason. The Conspiracy of Life: Meditations on Schelling and His Time. Albany: SUNY Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Wood, David. ‘Thinking With Cats’. In Animal Philosophy, edited by Peter, Atterton and Matthew, Calarco. London: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar

Wright, Elizabeth, ed. Feminism and Psychoanalysis: A Critical Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar

Xu, Ping. ‘Irigaray's Mimicry and the Problem of Essentialism’. Hypatia 10: 4 (1995): 76–89.Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion.Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion.. ‘Gender as Seriality: Thinking about Women as a Social Collective’. Signs 19: 3 (1994): 713–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar