Procreative mothers (sexual difference) and child-free sisters (gender)

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511619205.009

8 - Procreative mothers (sexual difference) and child-free sisters (gender)

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Juliet Mitchell

Edited by

Jude Browne

Show author details

Juliet Mitchell: Affiliation:
Professor of Psychoanalysis and Gender Studies, University of Cambridge
Jude Browne: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Feminism and femininity

Gender, sexual difference and demographic change

In order that the future does not miss out (‘pass’) on feminism, it is necessary for us to consider what feminism we are able to hand on (‘pass on’) to the next generation. Why does it seem to be the case that some benefits but little politics are transmitted? Has feminism created or reflected, or both, a change in the position of women?

The aim of this chapter, then, is to consider the relationship of feminism to social change. In particular my concern is second-wave feminism as it started in the West in the late 1960s. Although my focus is historical, this is not in any way a historical account; instead I have selected specific instances or events which stand as icons for my thesis. The major social change which concerns me is the demographic transition to non-replacement populations. How far did feminism spearhead this, thus putting politics in command, and how far was its advent a reflection of a wider historical process which had thrown up feminism as one of its effects? The connection between feminism and fertility changes has been well noted (Banks and Banks 1964). Here, however, I want to suggest that we have omitted half the equation: the fertility decline not only has women (and men) not reproducing so prolifically as hitherto, but has as its other side the rise to prominence of non-reproductive gender relations which are, to a degree, socially and psychologically autonomous.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Future of Gender , pp. 163 - 188

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619205.009 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Banks, J. A. and Banks, O. (1964) Feminism and Family Planning in Victorian England (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press).Google Scholar

Barry, H. III and Paxson, L. M. (1971) ‘Infancy and early child-hood: cross-cultural codes’, Ethnology 10: 466–508.Google Scholar

Butler, J. and Scott, J. (1992/2003) Feminists Theorize the Political (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Chodorow, N. (1978) The Reproduction of Mothering (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Beauvoir, S. (1947) Le Deuxième Sexe (Paris: Gallimard); (1952) The Second Sex (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar

Dunn, Judy (1985) Sisters and Brothers (London: Fontana Paperbacks).Google Scholar

Firestone, S. (1971) The Dialectics of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution (London: Jonathan Cape).Google Scholar

Friedan, B. (1964) The Feminine Mystique (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).Google Scholar

Hoare, B. (1967) ‘On Juliet Mitchell's “Women: The Longest Revolution” ’, New Left Review 41: 78–81.Google Scholar

Jardine, L. and Swindells, J. (1989) What's Left? (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Kapp, Yvonne (2001) Time Will Tell (London: Verso).Google Scholar

Kiernan, K., Lewis, J. and Land, H. (1998) Lone Motherhood in Twentieth-Century Britain: From Footnote to Front Page (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Lacan, J. (1949) ‘Le stade du miroir comme formateur de la fonction de jeu’, in Ecrits (Paris: Editions du Seuil), 93–101.Google Scholar

Mauthner, Melanie (2002) Sistering (London: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar

Mitchell, J. (2003) Siblings: Sex and Violence (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar

Mitchell, J. and Oakley, A. (1986) What is Feminism? (Oxford: Blackwells).Google Scholar

Pateman, Carol (1989) The Social Contract (Stamford: Stamford University Press).Google Scholar

Pateman, C. (1990) The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar

Perry, Ruth (2004) Novel Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Rowbotham, S. (1977) Hidden from History: 300 Years of Women's Oppression and the Fight against It (London: Pluto Press).Google Scholar

Scott, J. (1996) ‘Gender as a Category of Analysis’, in Scott, (ed.), Feminism and History (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 152–82.Google Scholar

Seccombe, W. (1995) Weathering the Storm: Working-Class Families from the Industrial Revolution to the Fertility Decline (London: Verso).Google Scholar

Sophocles, (1978) The Theban Plays (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).Google Scholar

Steedman, C. (1987) Landscape of a Good Woman (Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press).Google Scholar

Strathern, M. (2000) Talk to ‘Women's Education Study Day’ conference, Gender Studies, University of Cambridge, 25 November 2000.

Szreter, S. (1996) Fertility, Class and Gender in Britain, 1860–1940 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Weissner, T. S. and Gallimore, R. (1977) ‘My Brother's Keeper: Child and Sibling Caretaking’, Current Anthropology 18, 2: 169–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Winnicott, D. W. (1967) ‘Mirror-role of Mother and Family in Child Development’, in Playing and Reality (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books), 130–9.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.