J. A. Hobson as a Welfare Economist

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511750649.007

6 - J. A. Hobson as a Welfare Economist

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 July 2010

Roger E. Backhouse

Edited by

Roger E. Backhouse and

Tamotsu Nishizawa

Show author details

Roger E. Backhouse: Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Tamotsu Nishizawa: Affiliation:
Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

John Atkinson Hobson is renowned as an economic heretic. As a result of the remarks made by Keynes in his General Theory (1973 [1936]: 364–71) Hobson's heresy is generally associated with underconsumption. It can legitimately be argued that this permeates his work, from his first book, written with A. F. Mummery (1992 [1889]) to his writing on unemployment in the 1930s, taking in his analyses of industrial capitalism and imperialism along the way. Furthermore, in his autobiography, Confessions of an Economic Heretic (1938) Hobson presents underconsumption as the heresy that led to his systematic exclusion from academia. However, the Confessions also presents a different view. Underconsumption is ‘an early heresy’ – ‘the first open step in my heretical career’ (1938: 30). His ‘most destructive heresy’ (1938: 168), on the other hand, was that bargaining power was unequal between buyers and sellers, meaning that ‘whether under monopoly or so-called competitive conditions, markets are intrinsically unfair modes of distribution’.

Distribution by needs is not even approximately achieved by the ordinary higgling in a so-called competitive market. Everywhere, inequality of bargaining conditions, based on differences of needs, is represented in different amounts of gain.

(Hobson and Mummery 1992 [1889]: 191–2)

The reason why more attention had been paid to underconsumption than to this critique of markets was that the former was ‘a quarrel within the range of quantitative economic science’ (Hobson and Mummery 1992 [1889]: 164); the latter was ignored because it was too radical.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: No Wealth but Life
Welfare Economics and the Welfare State in Britain, 1880–1945
, pp. 114 - 135

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750649.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Backhouse, R. E. 2006. Sidgwick, Marshall and the Cambridge School of Economics. History of Political Economy 38(1): 15–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Backhouse, R. E. 2008. Faith, Morality and Welfare: The ‘English School of Welfare Economics’. History of Political Economy 40 (Annual Supplement): 212–36.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bharadwaj, K. 1972. Marshall on Pigou's Wealth and Welfare. Economica 39: 32–46.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blaug, M. 1997. Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cain, P. J. 1992. Introduction. In Work and Wealth, by Hobson, J. A., v–xiv. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar

Cain, P. J. 2002. Hobson and Imperialism: Radicalism, New Liberalism and Finance 1887–1938. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, J. M. 1914. Review of Work and Wealth by J. A. Hobson. Quarterly Journal of Economics 29(1): 177–80.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clarke, P. 1978. Liberals and Social Democrats. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Edgell, S., and Tilman, R.. 1994. John Hobson: Admirer and Critic of Thorstein Veblen. In J. A. Hobson after Fifty Years, ed. Pheby, J., 211–24. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hamilton, W. H. 1915. Economic Theory and ‘Social Reform’. Journal of Political Economy 23(6): 562–84.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hamilton, W. H. 1919a. An Appraisal of Clay's Economics. Journal of Political Economy 27(4): 300–9.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hamilton, W. H. 1919b. The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory. American Economic Review 9: 309–18.Google Scholar

Handman, M. S. 1915. Review of Work and Wealth by J.A. Hobson. American Economic Review 5: 314–15.Google Scholar

Hobson, J. A. 1894. The Evolution of Modern Capitalism. London: Walter Scott.Google Scholar

Hobson, J. A. 1898. John Ruskin: Social Reformer. London: James Nisbet. Reprinted in Hobson 1992.Google Scholar

Hobson, J. A. 1900. The Economics of Distribution. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hobson, J. A. 1901. The Social Problem. London: Nisbet.Google Scholar

Hobson, J. A. 1909. The Industrial System: An Inquiry into Earned and Unearned Income. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Hobson, J. A. 1914. Work and Wealth. London: Macmillan. Reprinted Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Hobson, J. A. 1925. Neo-classical Economics in Britain. Political Science Quarterly 40(3): 337–83. Reprinted in Hobson 1992.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hobson, J. A. 1926. Economic Art and Human Welfare. Journal of Philosophical Studies 1:467–80. Reprinted in Hobson 1992.Google Scholar

Hobson, J. A. 1929. Wealth and Life. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hobson, J. A. 1938. Confessions of an Economic Heretic. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Hobson, J. A. 1992. Writings on Distribution and Welfare. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar

Hobson, J. A., and Mummery, A. F. 1992 [1889]. The Physiology of Industry. London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar

Homan, P. T. 1927. The Impasse in Economic Theory. Journal of Political Economy 35(6): 776–803.CrossRef Google Scholar

Homan, P. T. 1928. Contemporary Economic Thought. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Kadish, A. 1990. Rewriting the Confessions: Hobson and the Extension Movement. In Reappraising J. A. Hobson: Humanism and Welfare, ed. Freeden, M., 137–66. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Keynes, J. M. 1973 [1936]. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, volume VII. LondonMacmillan.Google Scholar

Levin, H. J. 1956. Standards of Welfare in Economic Thought. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70(1): 117–38.CrossRef Google Scholar

Macgreggor, D. H. 1914. Review of Work and Wealth by J. A. Hobson. Economic Journal 24: 560–63.Google Scholar

MacKillop, I. D. 1986. British Ethical Societies. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar

Marshall, A. 1949. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1969. Utilitarianism. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill), volume 10, ed. Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. C. 1925. Quantitative Analysis in Economic Theory. American Economic Review 15(1): 1–12.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. C. 1969. Types of Economic Theory: From Mercantilism to Institutionalism. New York: Augustus Kelley.Google Scholar

Neale, W. C., and Mayhew, A.. 1994. Hobson, Veblen and American Institutionalism. In J. A. Hobson after Fifty Years, ed. Pheby, J., 225–37. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

O'Donnell, M. G. 1979. Pigou: An Extension of Sidgwickian Thought. History of Political Economy 11(4): 588–605.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pigou, A. C. 1912. Wealth and Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Pigou, A. C. 1920. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Pigou, A. C. 1932. The Economics of Welfare. 4th ed. London: Macmillan. Reprinted 1946.Google Scholar

Raffaelli, T. 2003. Marshall's Evolutionary Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Robbins, L. C. 1927. Mr. Hawtrey on the Scope of Economics. Economica 20: 172–8.CrossRef Google Scholar

Robbins, L. C. 1935. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Robbins, L. C. 2001. Economic Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rothschild, E. 2001. Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rutherford, M. 1994. J. A. Hobson and American Institutionalism: Under-Consumptionism and Technological Change. In J. A. Hobson after Fifty Years, ed. Pheby, J., 188–210. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Rutherford, M. 2007. American Institutionalism and Its English Connections. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14(2): 291–323.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sidgwick, H. 1874. The Methods of Ethics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sidgwick, H. 1883. Principles of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sidgwick, H. 1901. Principles of Political Economy, 3rd edition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Stedman Jones, G. 1884. Outcast London. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Veblen, T. B. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Whitaker, J. K. 1996. The Correspondence of Alfred Marshall, Economist. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Winch, D. 2009. Wealth and Life: Essays on the Intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain, 1848–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.