The History of International Criminal Prosecutions: Nuremberg and Tokyo

Robert Cryer; Hakan Friman; Darryl Robinson; Elizabeth Wilmshurst

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511760808.007

6 - The History of International Criminal Prosecutions: Nuremberg and Tokyo

from PART C - INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Darryl Robinson and

Robert Cryer: Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Hakan Friman: Affiliation:
University College London
Darryl Robinson: Affiliation:
Queen's University, Ontario
Elizabeth Wilmshurst: Affiliation:
University College London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

International criminal law, or something similar to it, has a very long history. Its closest European precursor before the modern era was the chivalric system that applied in the medieval era. The most notable of the trials that were related to this system was that of Peter von Hagenbach in Breisach in 1474. Although its status as a legal precedent is highly limited, the issues involved at that trial, superior orders, sexual offences, cooperation in evidence gathering, and pleas as to the jurisdiction of the court, have clear present-day relevance. The purpose of this chapter, however, is to introduce the modern history of international criminal prosecutions rather than provide a comprehensive overview of the entire history of the subject. Therefore we will start in the early part of the twentieth century, at the end of the First World War.

The commission on the responsibility of the authors of the war

After the First World War, the Allies set up a fifteen-member commission to investigate the responsibility for the start of the war, violations of the laws of war and what tribunal would be appropriate for trials. It reported in March 1919, determining that the central powers were responsible for starting the war and that there were violations of the laws of war and humanity. It recommended that high officials, including the Kaiser, be tried for ordering such crimes and on the basis of command responsibility.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure , pp. 109 - 121

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760808.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Appleman, John, Military Tribunals and International Crimes (Indianapolis, 1954).Google Scholar

Boister, Neil and Cryer, Robert, The Tokyo International Military Tribunal: A Reappraisal (Oxford, 2008).CrossRef Google Scholar

Boister, Neil and Cryer, Robert (eds.), Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal: Charter, Indictment and Judgments (Oxford, 2008).

Brackman, Arnold, The Other Nuremberg: The Story of the Tokyo War Crimes Trial (New York, 1987).Google Scholar

Ehard, Hans, ‘The Nuremberg Trial Against the Major War Criminals and International Law’ (1949) 43 American Journal of International Law223.CrossRef Google Scholar

Futamura, Madaoka, War Crimes Tribunals and Transitional Justice: The Tokyo Trial and the Nuremberg Legacy (London, 2007).CrossRef Google Scholar

Ginsburgs, George and Kudriavtsev, Vladimir (eds.), The Nuremberg Trial and International Law (Dordrecht, 1990).

Horwitz, Solis, ‘The Tokyo Trial’ (1950) 645 International Conciliation465.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, ‘Will the Judgment in the Nuremberg Trial Constitute a Precedent in International Law?’ (1947) 1 International Law Quarterly153.Google Scholar

Kopelman, Elizabeth, ‘Ideology and International Law: The Dissent of the Indian Justice at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial’ (1991) 23 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics373.Google Scholar

Kranzbühler, Otto, ‘Nuremberg: Eighteen Years Afterwards’ (1965) 14 De Paul Law Review333.Google Scholar

Lipmann, Matthew, ‘Nuremberg Forty-Five Years Later’ (1991) 7 Connecticut Journal of International Law1.Google Scholar

Mettraux, Guénaël, Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial (Oxford, 2008).Google Scholar

Minear, Richard H., Victor's Justice: The Tokyo War Crimes Trial (Princeton, 1971).Google Scholar

Pal, Radhabinodh, Crimes in International Relations (Calcutta, 1955).Google Scholar

Prevost, Anne-Marie, ‘Race and War Crimes: the 1945 War Crimes Trial of General Tomoyuki Yamashita’ (1992) 14 Human Rights Quarterly303.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pritchard, R. John and Zaide, Sonia M., The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: Transcripts (New York, 1981).Google Scholar

Reel, A. Frank, The Case of General Yamashita (Chicago, 1949).Google Scholar

Röling, B. V. A. and Cassese, Antonio, The Tokyo Trial and Beyond (Cambridge, 1992).Google Scholar

Schwarzenberger, Georg, ‘The Judgment of Nuremberg’ (1947) 21 Tulane Law Review329.Google Scholar

Stimson, Henry, ‘The Nuremberg Trial: Landmark in Law’ (1947) 25 Foreign Affairs179.CrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, Telford, The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trial (London, 1993).Google Scholar

Totani, Yuma, The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: The Pursuit of Justice in the Wake of World War II (Cambridge, MA, 2008).CrossRef Google Scholar

Tusa, Ann and Tusa, John, The Nuremberg Trial (London, 1983).Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy, ‘The Law of the Nuremberg Trial’ (1947) 41 American Journal of International Law37.CrossRef Google Scholar

Timothy, L. H. McCormack, ‘From Sun Tzu to the Sixth Committee, The Evolution of an International Criminal Law Regime’ in Timothy, L. H. McCormack and Gerry, J. Simpson (eds.), The Law of War Crimes, National and International Approaches (The Hague, 1997) 31Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif, ‘From Versailles to Rwanda in Seventy-Five Years, The Need to Establish an International Criminal Court’ (1997) 10 Harvard Human Rights Law Journal11.Google Scholar

Maurice, H. Keen, The Laws of War in the Late Middle Ages (London, 1965)Google Scholar

Theodor, Meron, Bloody Constraint, Crimes and Accountability in Shakespeare (New York, 1998).Google Scholar

Georg, Schwarzenberger, International Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (London, 1968)Google Scholar

Robert, Cryer, Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity in the International Criminal Law Regime (Cambridge, 2005)Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif, ‘World War I, “The War to End All Wars” and the Birth of a Handicapped International Criminal Justice System’ (2002) 30 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy244 at 269–73.Google Scholar

Claus, Kreß, ‘Versailles – Nuremberg – The Hague: Germany and International Criminal Law’ (2006) 40 International Lawyer15 at 16–20.Google Scholar

Manley, O. Hudson, ‘The Proposed International Criminal Court’ (1938) 32 American Journal of International Law549.Google Scholar

Arieh, Kochavi, Prelude to Nuremberg: Allied War Crimes Policy and the Question of Punishment (Durham, 1998).Google Scholar

Trial of Major War Criminals, Nuremberg (London, 1946) 85

Matthew, Lipmann, ‘Nuremberg Forty-Five Years Later’ (1991) 7 Connecticut Journal of International Law1, 39.Google Scholar

Trial of Major War Criminals, Nuremberg (London, 1946) 531–47.

Sheldon, Glueck, War Criminals: Their Prosecution and Punishment (New York, 1944)Google Scholar

Sheldon, Glueck, The Nuremberg Trial and Aggressive War (New York, 1946)Google Scholar

Arthur, Goodhart, ‘Questions and Answers Concerning the Nuremberg Trials’ (1947) 1 International Law Quarterly525, 527.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif, Crimes Against Humanity in International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (The Hague, 1999) 9–10.Google Scholar

Trial of Major War Criminals, Nuremberg (London, 1948) 26–8.

Chris af, Jochnik and Roger, Normand, ‘The Legitimation of Violence: A Critical History of the Law of War’ (1994) 35 Harvard International Law Journal49, 91–2.Google Scholar

Mark, Osiel, Mass Atrocity, Collective Memory and the Law (New Brunswick, 1997) 225–6.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif, ‘The Nuremberg Legacy’ in Bassiouni, M. Cherif (ed.), International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (New York, 1999), vol. III, 195Google Scholar

David, Luban, ‘The Legacies of Nuremberg’ (1987) 54 Social Research779.Google Scholar

Pritchard, R. John, ‘An Overview of the Historical Importance of the Tokyo War Trial’ in Chihiro, Hosoya, Yasuaki, Onuma, Nisuke, Ando and Richard, Minear (eds.), The Tokyo Trial: An International Symposium (Tokyo, 1986) 90, 92Google Scholar

John, Piccigallo, The Japanese on Trial (Austin, 1979) 212.Google Scholar

Yasuaki, Onuma, ‘Beyond Victor's Justice’ (1984) 11 Japan Echo63Google Scholar

Herbert, P. Bix, Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan (London, 2000)Google Scholar

Ian, Buruma, The Wages of Guilt: Memories of War in Germany and Japan (New York, 1994)Google Scholar

Timothy, L. H. McCormack, Gerry, J. Simpson and Yuki, Tanaka (eds.), The Tokyo IMT After 60 Years (The Hague, 2010).

Howard, Levie, Terrorism in War: The Law of War Crimes (New York, 1992) 72–98Google Scholar

Matthew, Lippman, ‘The Other Nuremberg, American Prosecutions of Nazi War Criminals in Occupied Germany’ (1992) 3 Indiana International and Comparative Law Review1.Google Scholar

Anthony, P. V. Rogers, ‘War Crimes Trials Under the Royal Warrant, British Practice 1945–1949’ (1990) 39 International and Comparative Law Quarterly780.Google Scholar

Adam, Basak, ‘The Influence of the Nuremberg Judgment on the Practice of the Allied Courts in Germany’ (1977–1978) 9 Polish Yearbook of International Law161.Google Scholar

Robert, W. Miller, ‘War Crimes Trials at Yokohama’ (1948–1949) 15 Brooklyn Law Review19.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.