Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T04:22:19.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Michael Morris
Michael Morris
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language , pp. 316 - 322
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, W., Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Aristotle, , De Interpretatione, in Categories and De Interpretatione, trans. Ackrill, J. L. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963)Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J., ‘Locke on Language’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 14 (1984), pp. 45–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L., ‘Truth’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 24 (1950), pp. 111–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L.,How to do Things with Words, 2nd edn, Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, M., eds. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975)Google Scholar
Avramides, A., ‘Intention and Convention’, in Hale, B. and Wright, C., eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Language (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), pp. 60–86Google Scholar
Avramides, A., Meaning and Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J., Language, Truth and Logic (London: Gollancz, 1936)Google Scholar
Ayers, M., Locke: Epistemology and Ontology (London: Routledge, 1991)Google Scholar
Bach, K., Thought and Reference (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Bach, K., and Harnish, R. M., Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Baker, G. P., and Hacker, P. M. S., An Analytical Commentary on Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell, 1983)Google Scholar
Baker, G. P.,and Hacker, P. M. S., Scepticism, Rules, and Language (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984)Google Scholar
Barker, S., Renewing Meaning: A Speech-Act Theoretic Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barwise, J., and Perry, J., Situations and Attitudes (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983)Google Scholar
Beaney, M., ed., The Frege Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997)Google Scholar
Bell, D., ‘How “Russellian” was Frege?’, Mind, 99 (1990), pp. 267–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S., ‘The Individual Strikes Back’, Synthèse, 58 (1984), pp. 281–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boghossian, P., ‘The Rule-Following Considerations’, Mind, 98 (1989), pp. 507–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, F. H., Appearance and Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1930)Google Scholar
Brown, J., ‘Natural Kind Terms and Recognitional Capacities’, Mind, 107 (1998), pp. 275–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T., ‘Belief De Re’, Journal of Philosophy, 74 (1977), pp. 338–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T., ‘Sinning Against Frege’, The Philosophical Review, 88 (1979), pp. 398–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T.,‘On Davidson's “Saying That”’, in Lepore, E., ed., Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, pp. 190–208
Burnyeat, M., ‘Wittgenstein and Augustine De Magistro’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 61 (1987), pp. 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R., The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, trans. George, R. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967)Google Scholar
Carnap, R.,‘The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language’, in Ayer, A. J., ed., Logical Positivism (Glencoe, IL.: The Free Press), pp. 60–81
Chomsky, N., Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965)Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.,‘Language and Problems of Knowledge’, in Martinich,, A. P. ed., Philosophy of Language, 4th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 581–99Google Scholar
Church, A., ‘On Carnap's Analysis of Statements of Assertion and Belief’, Analysis, 10 (1950), pp. 97–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D., ‘Theories of Meaning and Learnable Languages’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 3–16
Davidson, D., ‘Truth and Meaning’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 17–36Google Scholar
Davidson, D., ‘On Saying That’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 93–108CrossRef
Davidson, D., ‘Radical Interpretation’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 125–40Google Scholar
Davidson, D.,‘Belief and the Basis of Meaning’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 141–54
Davidson, D.,‘Thought and Talk’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 155–70
Davidson, D.,‘On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 183–98
Davidson, D.,‘Reply to Foster’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 171–80
Davidson, D.,‘Reality without Reference’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 215–25
Davidson, D.,‘The Inscrutability of Reference’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 227–41
Davidson, D.,‘Moods and Performances’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 109–21
Davidson, D., Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Davidson, D.,‘A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs’, in Lepore, E., ed., Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, pp. 433–46
Davidson, D., and Harman, G., eds., Semantics of Natural Language (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1972), pp. 253–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnellan, K., ‘Reference and Definite Descriptions’, Philosophical Review, 75 (1966), pp. 281–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duhem, P., The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, trans. Wiener, P. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1954)Google Scholar
Dummett, M., Frege: Philosophy of Language (London: Duckworth, 1973);Google Scholar
Dummett, M.‘What is a Theory of Meaning? (i)’, in his The Seas of Language, pp. 1–33
Dummett, M.,‘What is a Theory of Meaning? (ii)’, in his The Seas of Language, pp. 34–93
Dummett, M., The Seas of Language (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Evans, G., ‘The Causal Theory of Names’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 47 (1973), pp. 187–208; reprinted in his Collected PapersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G.,‘Understanding Demonstratives’, in Parret, H. and Bouveresse, J., eds., Meaning and Understanding (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1981), pp. 280–303; reprinted in his Collected Papers, pp. 291–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G., The Varieties of Reference (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Evans, G., Collected Papers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Evans, G., and McDowell, J., eds., Truth and Meaning (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976)Google Scholar
Evnine, S., Donald Davidson (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Fodor, J., A Theory of Content (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Fogelin, R., Wittgenstein, 2nd edn (London: Routledge, 1987)Google Scholar
Føllesdal, D., ‘Quine on Modality’, in Gibson, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Quine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M., Wittgenstein on the Arbitrariness of Grammar (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Frege, G., Begriffschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formalsprache des reinen Denkens (Halle, 1879); trans. in full in Heijenoort, J., ed., From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931 (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1967)Google Scholar
Frege, G.,The Foundations of Arithmetic, trans. Austin, J. L. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980)Google Scholar
Frege, G.,‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, Zeitung für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100 (1892), pp. 25–50; trans. as ‘On Sense and Meaning’ in Frege, G., Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy
Frege, G.,‘Function and Concept’, in G. Frege, Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy
Frege, G.,‘On Concept and Object’, in G. Frege, Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy
Frege, G.,‘Thoughts’, in G. Frege
Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, ed. McGuinness, B. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984)Google Scholar
Frege, G.,Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, eds. G. Gabriel, H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, C. Thiel, and A. Veraart, abridged for the English edn by McGunness, B. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980)
Frege, G.,Posthumous Writings, eds. Hermes, J., Kambartel, F., and Kaulbach, F. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979)
Furth, M., ‘Two Types of Denotation’, in Rescher, N., ed., Studies in Logical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1968), pp. 9–45Google Scholar
George, A., ‘Whose Language is it Anyway? Some Notes on Idiolects’, Philosophical Quarterly, 40 (1990), pp. 275–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, M., From Naming to Saying: The Unity of the Proposition (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P., ‘Meaning’, The Philosophical Review, 66 (1957), pp. 377–88; reprinted in his Studies in the Ways of WordsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P., ‘Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning’, Foundations of Language, 4 (1968), pp. 225–42; reprinted in his Studies in the Ways of WordsGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P., ‘Utterer's Meaning and Intentions’, The Philosophical Review, 78 (1969), pp. 147–77; reprinted in his Studies in the Ways of WordsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.,‘Meaning Revisited’, in Smith, N. V., ed., Mutual Knowledge (New York: Academic Press, 1982), pp. 223–43; reprinted in his Studies in the Ways of WordsGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P., Studies in the Ways of Words (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Grice, H. P., and Strawson, P. F., ‘In Defense of a Dogma’, Philosophical Review, 65 (1956), pp. 141–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S., ‘Philosophy’, in Glock, H-J., ed., Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001), pp. 322–47Google Scholar
Hacking, I., Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G., Review of ‘Meaning’, by Stephen Schiffer, Journal of Philosophy, 71 (1974), pp. 224–9
Hobbes, T., Leviathan, ed. Plamenatz, J. (Glasgow: Collins, 1962)Google Scholar
Hookway, C., Quine (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature, eds. , D. and Norton, M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Hume, D.,Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, in his Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, L. A. Selby-Bigge, ed., 3rd edn, Nidditch, P. H., ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975)
Husserl, E., Logical Investigations, trans. Findlay, J. N. (London: Routledge, 2001)Google Scholar
Kaplan, D.,‘Afterthoughts’, in Almog, J., Perry, J., and Wettstein, H., eds., Themes from Kaplan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), pp. 569–71Google Scholar
Kaplan, D.,‘Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice’, in Hintikka, J., Moravcsik, J. and Suppes, P., eds., Approaches to Natural Language (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973), appendix xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, A., Frege (London: Penguin, 1995)Google Scholar
Kenny, A., Wittgenstein, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005)Google Scholar
Kirk, R., Translation Determined (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Kretzmann, N., ‘The Main Thesis of Locke's Semantic Theory’, Philosophical Review, 77 (1968), pp. 175–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S., Naming and Necessity, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980)Google Scholar
Kripke, S.,‘Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference’, in French, P., Uehling, T., and Wettstein, H., eds., Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977), pp. 6–27Google Scholar
Kripke, S.,‘A Puzzle about Belief’, in Margalit, A., ed., Meaning and Use (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979), pp. 239–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S., Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language (Oxford: Blackwell, 1982)Google Scholar
Larson, R., and Segal, G., Knowledge of Meaning (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995), pp. 56–62Google Scholar
Lepore, E., ed., Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986)Google Scholar
Lewis, D., Convention (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969)Google Scholar
Lewis, D., ‘Radical Interpretation’, Synthèse, 23 (1974), pp. 331–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D.,‘Languages and Language’, in Gunderson, K., ed., Language, Mind and Knowledge (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975), pp. 3–35Google Scholar
Loar, B., ‘Two Theories of Meaning’, in Evans, G. and McDowell, J., eds., Truth and Meaning, pp. 138–61
Locke, J., An Essay concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975)Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J., Locke on Human Understanding (London: Routledge, 1995)Google Scholar
Lycan, W.Philosophy of Language (London: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar
McCulloch, G., The Game of the Name (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
McDowell, J., ‘De Re Senses’, Philosophical Quarterly, 34 (1984), pp. 283–94; reprinted in his Mind, Knowledge, and RealityCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J., ‘Wittgenstein on Following a Rule’, Synthèse, 58 (1984), pp. 325–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J.,‘Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space’, in Pettit, P. and McDowell, J., eds., Subject, Thought, and Context (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 137–68; reprinted in his Mind, Knowledge, and RealityGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J., Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
McDowell, J., Mind, Value, and Reality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
McFetridge, I., ‘Propositions and Davidson's Account of Indirect Discourse’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 76 (1975), pp. 131–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, C., Wittgenstein on Meaning (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984)Google Scholar
McGinn, M., Wittgenstein and the Philosophical Investigations (London: Routledge, 1997)Google Scholar
Mellor, D. H., ‘Natural Kinds’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 28 (1977), pp. 299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinong, A., “On the Theory of Objects”, in Chisholm, R., ed., Realism and the Background of Phenomenology (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1960), pp. 76–117Google Scholar
Mill, J. S., A System of Logic (London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1875)Google Scholar
Miller, A., Philosophy of Language (London: UCL Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A., and Wright, C., eds., Rule-Following and Meaning (Chesham: Acumen, 2002)
Millikan, R. G., Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G., ‘Truth Rules, Hoverflies, and the Kripke–Wittgenstein Paradox’, The Philosophical Review, 99, 3. (1990), pp. 323–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. W., Points of View (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Mulhall, S., Philosophical Myths of the Fall (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Neale, S., Descriptions (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Neale, S., Facing Facts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, H., Frege: A Critical Introduction (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000)
Orenstein, A., W. V. Quine (Chesham: Acumen, 2002)Google Scholar
Perry, J., ‘Frege on Demonstratives’, Philosophical Review, 86 (1977), pp. 474–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J., ‘The Problem of the Essential Indexical’, Noûs, 13 (1979), pp. 3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, A., The Nature of Necessity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platts, M., Ways of Meaning (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979)Google Scholar
Putnam, H., ‘Meaning and Reference’, Journal of Philosophy, 70 (1973), pp. 699–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H., ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’, in his Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers Volume 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 215–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O., ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, in his From a Logical Point of View, pp. 20–46
Quine, W. V. O.,‘Reference and Modality’, in his From a Logical Point of View
Quine, W. V. O., From a Logical Point of View, 2nd edn (New York: Harper and Row, 1961)Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O., ‘Three Grades of Modal Involvement’, reprinted in Quine's The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, 2nd edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976)Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, Journal of Philosophy, 53 (1956), pp. 177–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O., Word and Object (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960)Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.‘Ontological Relativity’, in his Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969), pp, 26–68Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O., ‘On the Reasons for Indeterminacy of Translation’, Journal of Philosophy, 67 (1970), pp. 178–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, M., ‘A Strawsonian Objection to Russell's Theory of Descriptions’, Analysis, 53 (1993), pp. 209–12Google Scholar
Ramberg, B., Donald Davidson's Philosophy of Language: An Introduction (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989)Google Scholar
Recanati, F., Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Rumfitt, I., ‘Content and Context: The Paratactic Theory Revisited and Revised’, Mind, 102 (1993), pp. 429–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B., Principles of Mathematics, 2nd edn (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1937)Google Scholar
Russell, B., ‘On Denoting’, Mind, 14 (1905), pp. 479–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B., Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, 2nd edn (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1920)Google Scholar
Russell, B.,‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’, Monist, 28 (1918) and 29 (1919), reprinted in B. Russell, Logic and Knowledge, ed. Marsh, R. (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1956), pp. 177–281
Russell, B.‘Mr Strawson on Referring’, Mind, 66 (1957), pp. 387–8Google Scholar
Sainsbury, M., Russell (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979)Google Scholar
Salmon, N., Frege's Puzzle (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Salmon, N., and Soames, S., eds., Propositions and Attitudes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Schiffer, S., Meaning (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972)Google Scholar
Schiffer, S., Remnants of Meaning (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Searle, J., ‘Proper Names’, Mind, 67 (1958), pp. 166–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J., Speech Acts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, R. B., The Rivals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968)Google Scholar
Smith, A. D., ‘Rigidity and Scope’, Mind, 93 (1984), pp. 177–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. D., ‘Natural Kind Terms: A Neo-Lockean Theory’, European Journal of Philosophy, 13 (2005), pp. 70–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, S., Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D., Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: an Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F., ‘On Referring’, Mind, 59 (1950), pp. 320–44; reprinted in his Logico-Linguistic PapersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F., ‘Intention and Convention in Speech Acts’, Philosophical Review, 73 (1964), pp. 439–60; reprinted in his Logico-Linguistic PapersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F.,‘Meaning and Truth’, in his Logico-Linguistic Papers, pp. 170–189
Strawson, P. F., Logico-Linguistic Papers (London: Methuen, 1971), pp. 149–69Google Scholar
Tarski, A., ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, in his Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1956), pp. 152–278Google Scholar
Tarski, A., ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4 (1944), pp. 341–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, D., Sameness and Substance Renewed (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, D., ‘Languages as Social Objects’, Philosophy, 72 (1997), pp. 499–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B., ‘Wittgenstein and Idealism’, in his Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 144–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, P., The Idea of a Social Science (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958)Google Scholar
Winch, P., ‘Understanding a Primitive Society’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 1 (1964), 307–24Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1922)Google Scholar
L. Wittgenstein,Wittgenstein's Lectures: Cambridge 1930–1932, ed. Lee, D. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980)Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001)Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., On Certainty (Oxford: Blackwell, 1977)Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.,‘Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough’, in L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Occasions 1912–1951, eds. Klagge, J. and Nordmann, A. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993), pp. 118–55
Wittgenstein, L.Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, ed. Barrett, C. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1966), pp. 53–72Google Scholar
Wright, C., Rails to Infinity: Essays on Themes from Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Zalabardo, J., ‘Kripke's Normativity Argument’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 27 (1997), pp. 467–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemach, E., ‘Putnam's Theory on the Reference of Substance Terms’, Journal of Philosophy, 73 (1976), pp. 116–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, W., Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Aristotle, , De Interpretatione, in Categories and De Interpretatione, trans. Ackrill, J. L. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963)Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J., ‘Locke on Language’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 14 (1984), pp. 45–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L., ‘Truth’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 24 (1950), pp. 111–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L.,How to do Things with Words, 2nd edn, Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, M., eds. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975)Google Scholar
Avramides, A., ‘Intention and Convention’, in Hale, B. and Wright, C., eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Language (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), pp. 60–86Google Scholar
Avramides, A., Meaning and Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J., Language, Truth and Logic (London: Gollancz, 1936)Google Scholar
Ayers, M., Locke: Epistemology and Ontology (London: Routledge, 1991)Google Scholar
Bach, K., Thought and Reference (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Bach, K., and Harnish, R. M., Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Baker, G. P., and Hacker, P. M. S., An Analytical Commentary on Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell, 1983)Google Scholar
Baker, G. P.,and Hacker, P. M. S., Scepticism, Rules, and Language (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984)Google Scholar
Barker, S., Renewing Meaning: A Speech-Act Theoretic Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barwise, J., and Perry, J., Situations and Attitudes (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983)Google Scholar
Beaney, M., ed., The Frege Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997)Google Scholar
Bell, D., ‘How “Russellian” was Frege?’, Mind, 99 (1990), pp. 267–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S., ‘The Individual Strikes Back’, Synthèse, 58 (1984), pp. 281–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boghossian, P., ‘The Rule-Following Considerations’, Mind, 98 (1989), pp. 507–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, F. H., Appearance and Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1930)Google Scholar
Brown, J., ‘Natural Kind Terms and Recognitional Capacities’, Mind, 107 (1998), pp. 275–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T., ‘Belief De Re’, Journal of Philosophy, 74 (1977), pp. 338–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T., ‘Sinning Against Frege’, The Philosophical Review, 88 (1979), pp. 398–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T.,‘On Davidson's “Saying That”’, in Lepore, E., ed., Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, pp. 190–208
Burnyeat, M., ‘Wittgenstein and Augustine De Magistro’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 61 (1987), pp. 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R., The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, trans. George, R. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967)Google Scholar
Carnap, R.,‘The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language’, in Ayer, A. J., ed., Logical Positivism (Glencoe, IL.: The Free Press), pp. 60–81
Chomsky, N., Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965)Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.,‘Language and Problems of Knowledge’, in Martinich,, A. P. ed., Philosophy of Language, 4th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 581–99Google Scholar
Church, A., ‘On Carnap's Analysis of Statements of Assertion and Belief’, Analysis, 10 (1950), pp. 97–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D., ‘Theories of Meaning and Learnable Languages’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 3–16
Davidson, D., ‘Truth and Meaning’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 17–36Google Scholar
Davidson, D., ‘On Saying That’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 93–108CrossRef
Davidson, D., ‘Radical Interpretation’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 125–40Google Scholar
Davidson, D.,‘Belief and the Basis of Meaning’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 141–54
Davidson, D.,‘Thought and Talk’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 155–70
Davidson, D.,‘On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 183–98
Davidson, D.,‘Reply to Foster’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 171–80
Davidson, D.,‘Reality without Reference’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 215–25
Davidson, D.,‘The Inscrutability of Reference’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 227–41
Davidson, D.,‘Moods and Performances’, in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 109–21
Davidson, D., Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Davidson, D.,‘A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs’, in Lepore, E., ed., Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, pp. 433–46
Davidson, D., and Harman, G., eds., Semantics of Natural Language (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1972), pp. 253–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnellan, K., ‘Reference and Definite Descriptions’, Philosophical Review, 75 (1966), pp. 281–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duhem, P., The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, trans. Wiener, P. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1954)Google Scholar
Dummett, M., Frege: Philosophy of Language (London: Duckworth, 1973);Google Scholar
Dummett, M.‘What is a Theory of Meaning? (i)’, in his The Seas of Language, pp. 1–33
Dummett, M.,‘What is a Theory of Meaning? (ii)’, in his The Seas of Language, pp. 34–93
Dummett, M., The Seas of Language (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Evans, G., ‘The Causal Theory of Names’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 47 (1973), pp. 187–208; reprinted in his Collected PapersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G.,‘Understanding Demonstratives’, in Parret, H. and Bouveresse, J., eds., Meaning and Understanding (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1981), pp. 280–303; reprinted in his Collected Papers, pp. 291–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G., The Varieties of Reference (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Evans, G., Collected Papers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Evans, G., and McDowell, J., eds., Truth and Meaning (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976)Google Scholar
Evnine, S., Donald Davidson (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Fodor, J., A Theory of Content (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Fogelin, R., Wittgenstein, 2nd edn (London: Routledge, 1987)Google Scholar
Føllesdal, D., ‘Quine on Modality’, in Gibson, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Quine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M., Wittgenstein on the Arbitrariness of Grammar (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Frege, G., Begriffschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formalsprache des reinen Denkens (Halle, 1879); trans. in full in Heijenoort, J., ed., From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931 (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1967)Google Scholar
Frege, G.,The Foundations of Arithmetic, trans. Austin, J. L. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980)Google Scholar
Frege, G.,‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, Zeitung für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100 (1892), pp. 25–50; trans. as ‘On Sense and Meaning’ in Frege, G., Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy
Frege, G.,‘Function and Concept’, in G. Frege, Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy
Frege, G.,‘On Concept and Object’, in G. Frege, Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy
Frege, G.,‘Thoughts’, in G. Frege
Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, ed. McGuinness, B. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984)Google Scholar
Frege, G.,Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, eds. G. Gabriel, H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, C. Thiel, and A. Veraart, abridged for the English edn by McGunness, B. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980)
Frege, G.,Posthumous Writings, eds. Hermes, J., Kambartel, F., and Kaulbach, F. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979)
Furth, M., ‘Two Types of Denotation’, in Rescher, N., ed., Studies in Logical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1968), pp. 9–45Google Scholar
George, A., ‘Whose Language is it Anyway? Some Notes on Idiolects’, Philosophical Quarterly, 40 (1990), pp. 275–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, M., From Naming to Saying: The Unity of the Proposition (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P., ‘Meaning’, The Philosophical Review, 66 (1957), pp. 377–88; reprinted in his Studies in the Ways of WordsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P., ‘Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning’, Foundations of Language, 4 (1968), pp. 225–42; reprinted in his Studies in the Ways of WordsGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P., ‘Utterer's Meaning and Intentions’, The Philosophical Review, 78 (1969), pp. 147–77; reprinted in his Studies in the Ways of WordsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.,‘Meaning Revisited’, in Smith, N. V., ed., Mutual Knowledge (New York: Academic Press, 1982), pp. 223–43; reprinted in his Studies in the Ways of WordsGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P., Studies in the Ways of Words (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Grice, H. P., and Strawson, P. F., ‘In Defense of a Dogma’, Philosophical Review, 65 (1956), pp. 141–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S., ‘Philosophy’, in Glock, H-J., ed., Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001), pp. 322–47Google Scholar
Hacking, I., Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G., Review of ‘Meaning’, by Stephen Schiffer, Journal of Philosophy, 71 (1974), pp. 224–9
Hobbes, T., Leviathan, ed. Plamenatz, J. (Glasgow: Collins, 1962)Google Scholar
Hookway, C., Quine (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature, eds. , D. and Norton, M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Hume, D.,Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, in his Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, L. A. Selby-Bigge, ed., 3rd edn, Nidditch, P. H., ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975)
Husserl, E., Logical Investigations, trans. Findlay, J. N. (London: Routledge, 2001)Google Scholar
Kaplan, D.,‘Afterthoughts’, in Almog, J., Perry, J., and Wettstein, H., eds., Themes from Kaplan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), pp. 569–71Google Scholar
Kaplan, D.,‘Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice’, in Hintikka, J., Moravcsik, J. and Suppes, P., eds., Approaches to Natural Language (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973), appendix xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, A., Frege (London: Penguin, 1995)Google Scholar
Kenny, A., Wittgenstein, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005)Google Scholar
Kirk, R., Translation Determined (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Kretzmann, N., ‘The Main Thesis of Locke's Semantic Theory’, Philosophical Review, 77 (1968), pp. 175–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S., Naming and Necessity, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980)Google Scholar
Kripke, S.,‘Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference’, in French, P., Uehling, T., and Wettstein, H., eds., Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977), pp. 6–27Google Scholar
Kripke, S.,‘A Puzzle about Belief’, in Margalit, A., ed., Meaning and Use (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979), pp. 239–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S., Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language (Oxford: Blackwell, 1982)Google Scholar
Larson, R., and Segal, G., Knowledge of Meaning (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995), pp. 56–62Google Scholar
Lepore, E., ed., Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986)Google Scholar
Lewis, D., Convention (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969)Google Scholar
Lewis, D., ‘Radical Interpretation’, Synthèse, 23 (1974), pp. 331–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D.,‘Languages and Language’, in Gunderson, K., ed., Language, Mind and Knowledge (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975), pp. 3–35Google Scholar
Loar, B., ‘Two Theories of Meaning’, in Evans, G. and McDowell, J., eds., Truth and Meaning, pp. 138–61
Locke, J., An Essay concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975)Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J., Locke on Human Understanding (London: Routledge, 1995)Google Scholar
Lycan, W.Philosophy of Language (London: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar
McCulloch, G., The Game of the Name (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
McDowell, J., ‘De Re Senses’, Philosophical Quarterly, 34 (1984), pp. 283–94; reprinted in his Mind, Knowledge, and RealityCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J., ‘Wittgenstein on Following a Rule’, Synthèse, 58 (1984), pp. 325–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J.,‘Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space’, in Pettit, P. and McDowell, J., eds., Subject, Thought, and Context (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 137–68; reprinted in his Mind, Knowledge, and RealityGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J., Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
McDowell, J., Mind, Value, and Reality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
McFetridge, I., ‘Propositions and Davidson's Account of Indirect Discourse’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 76 (1975), pp. 131–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, C., Wittgenstein on Meaning (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984)Google Scholar
McGinn, M., Wittgenstein and the Philosophical Investigations (London: Routledge, 1997)Google Scholar
Mellor, D. H., ‘Natural Kinds’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 28 (1977), pp. 299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinong, A., “On the Theory of Objects”, in Chisholm, R., ed., Realism and the Background of Phenomenology (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1960), pp. 76–117Google Scholar
Mill, J. S., A System of Logic (London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1875)Google Scholar
Miller, A., Philosophy of Language (London: UCL Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A., and Wright, C., eds., Rule-Following and Meaning (Chesham: Acumen, 2002)
Millikan, R. G., Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G., ‘Truth Rules, Hoverflies, and the Kripke–Wittgenstein Paradox’, The Philosophical Review, 99, 3. (1990), pp. 323–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. W., Points of View (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Mulhall, S., Philosophical Myths of the Fall (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Neale, S., Descriptions (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Neale, S., Facing Facts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, H., Frege: A Critical Introduction (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000)
Orenstein, A., W. V. Quine (Chesham: Acumen, 2002)Google Scholar
Perry, J., ‘Frege on Demonstratives’, Philosophical Review, 86 (1977), pp. 474–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J., ‘The Problem of the Essential Indexical’, Noûs, 13 (1979), pp. 3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, A., The Nature of Necessity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platts, M., Ways of Meaning (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979)Google Scholar
Putnam, H., ‘Meaning and Reference’, Journal of Philosophy, 70 (1973), pp. 699–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H., ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’, in his Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers Volume 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 215–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O., ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, in his From a Logical Point of View, pp. 20–46
Quine, W. V. O.,‘Reference and Modality’, in his From a Logical Point of View
Quine, W. V. O., From a Logical Point of View, 2nd edn (New York: Harper and Row, 1961)Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O., ‘Three Grades of Modal Involvement’, reprinted in Quine's The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, 2nd edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976)Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, Journal of Philosophy, 53 (1956), pp. 177–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O., Word and Object (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960)Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.‘Ontological Relativity’, in his Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969), pp, 26–68Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O., ‘On the Reasons for Indeterminacy of Translation’, Journal of Philosophy, 67 (1970), pp. 178–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, M., ‘A Strawsonian Objection to Russell's Theory of Descriptions’, Analysis, 53 (1993), pp. 209–12Google Scholar
Ramberg, B., Donald Davidson's Philosophy of Language: An Introduction (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989)Google Scholar
Recanati, F., Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Rumfitt, I., ‘Content and Context: The Paratactic Theory Revisited and Revised’, Mind, 102 (1993), pp. 429–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B., Principles of Mathematics, 2nd edn (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1937)Google Scholar
Russell, B., ‘On Denoting’, Mind, 14 (1905), pp. 479–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B., Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, 2nd edn (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1920)Google Scholar
Russell, B.,‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’, Monist, 28 (1918) and 29 (1919), reprinted in B. Russell, Logic and Knowledge, ed. Marsh, R. (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1956), pp. 177–281
Russell, B.‘Mr Strawson on Referring’, Mind, 66 (1957), pp. 387–8Google Scholar
Sainsbury, M., Russell (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979)Google Scholar
Salmon, N., Frege's Puzzle (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Salmon, N., and Soames, S., eds., Propositions and Attitudes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Schiffer, S., Meaning (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972)Google Scholar
Schiffer, S., Remnants of Meaning (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Searle, J., ‘Proper Names’, Mind, 67 (1958), pp. 166–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J., Speech Acts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, R. B., The Rivals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968)Google Scholar
Smith, A. D., ‘Rigidity and Scope’, Mind, 93 (1984), pp. 177–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. D., ‘Natural Kind Terms: A Neo-Lockean Theory’, European Journal of Philosophy, 13 (2005), pp. 70–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, S., Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D., Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: an Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F., ‘On Referring’, Mind, 59 (1950), pp. 320–44; reprinted in his Logico-Linguistic PapersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F., ‘Intention and Convention in Speech Acts’, Philosophical Review, 73 (1964), pp. 439–60; reprinted in his Logico-Linguistic PapersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F.,‘Meaning and Truth’, in his Logico-Linguistic Papers, pp. 170–189
Strawson, P. F., Logico-Linguistic Papers (London: Methuen, 1971), pp. 149–69Google Scholar
Tarski, A., ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, in his Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1956), pp. 152–278Google Scholar
Tarski, A., ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4 (1944), pp. 341–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, D., Sameness and Substance Renewed (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, D., ‘Languages as Social Objects’, Philosophy, 72 (1997), pp. 499–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B., ‘Wittgenstein and Idealism’, in his Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 144–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, P., The Idea of a Social Science (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958)Google Scholar
Winch, P., ‘Understanding a Primitive Society’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 1 (1964), 307–24Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1922)Google Scholar
L. Wittgenstein,Wittgenstein's Lectures: Cambridge 1930–1932, ed. Lee, D. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980)Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001)Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., On Certainty (Oxford: Blackwell, 1977)Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.,‘Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough’, in L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Occasions 1912–1951, eds. Klagge, J. and Nordmann, A. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993), pp. 118–55
Wittgenstein, L.Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, ed. Barrett, C. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1966), pp. 53–72Google Scholar
Wright, C., Rails to Infinity: Essays on Themes from Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Zalabardo, J., ‘Kripke's Normativity Argument’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 27 (1997), pp. 467–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemach, E., ‘Putnam's Theory on the Reference of Substance Terms’, Journal of Philosophy, 73 (1976), pp. 116–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works cited
  • Michael Morris, University of Sussex
  • Book: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801464.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works cited
  • Michael Morris, University of Sussex
  • Book: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801464.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works cited
  • Michael Morris, University of Sussex
  • Book: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801464.018
Available formats
×