Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T15:15:16.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2010

Paula J. Rudall
Paula J. Rudall
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Anatomy of Flowering Plants
An Introduction to Structure and Development
 , pp. 128 - 138
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, W. R. 1980. Cryptic self-fertilization in the Malpighiaceae. Science 207 892–893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
APG. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85 531–553.CrossRef
APG. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141 399–436.CrossRef
Arber, A. 1934. The Gramineae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arber, A. 1937. Studies in flower structure III. On the ‘corona’ and androecium in certain Amaryllidaceae. Annals of Botany 1 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baijnath, H. and Cutler, D. F.. 1993. A contribution to the anatomy and surface details of leaves of the genus Bulbine (Asphodelaceae) in Africa. South African Journal of Botany 59 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, I. W. 1953. Evolution of the tracheary tissue of land plants. American Journal of Botany 40 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, P. W. 1975. The root cap. In: The development and form of roots. Torrey, J. G. and Clarkson, D. F. (eds). London: Academic Press, pp. 21–54.Google Scholar
Barthlott, W. 1981. Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nordic Journal of Botany 1 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthlott, W. and Wollenweber, E.. 1981. Zur Feinstruktur, Chemie und taxonomischen Signifikanz epicuticularer Wachse und ähnlicher Sekrete. Tropische und Subtropische Pflanzenwelt 32 1–67.Google Scholar
Baum, S. B., Dubrovsky, J. G. and Rost, T. L.. 2002. Apical organization and maturation of the cortex and vascular cylinder in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) roots. American Journal of Botany 89 908–920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaumont, J., Cutler, D. F., Reynolds, T. and Vaughan, J. G.. 1985. The secretory tissue of aloes and their allies. Israel Journal of Botany 34 265–282.Google Scholar
Beck, C. R. 2005. An Introduction to Plant Structure and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnke, H. D. 1991. Distribution and evolution of forms and types of sieve tube plastids in the dicotyledons. Aliso 3 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesewinkel, F. D. and F. Bouman. 1984. The seed: structure. In: Embryology of Angiosperms. Johri, B. M. (ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 567–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouman, F. 1984. The ovule. In: Embryology of Angiosperms. Johri, B. M. (ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 123–157.Google Scholar
Brett, D. W. and Sommerard, A. P.. 1986. Ultrastructural development of plastids in the epidermis and starch layer of glossy Ranunculus petals. Annals of Botany 58 903–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casson, S. A. and Lindsey, K.. 2003. Genes and signalling in root development. Tansley Review. New Phyologist 158 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choat, B., Jansen, S., Zwieniecki, M., Smets, E. and Holbrook, N. M.. 2004. Changes in pit membrane porosity due to deflection and stretching: the role of vestured pits. Journal of Experimental Botany 55 1569–1575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clowes, F. A. L. 1961. Apical meristems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clowes, F. A. L. 1994. Origin of the epidermis in root meristems. New Phytologist 127 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocucci, A. E. and Anton, A. M.. 1988. The grass flower: suggestions on its origin and evolution. Flora 181 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, E. J. H. 1976. The Seeds of Dicotyledons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, D. F., Rudall, P. J., Gasson, P. E. and Gale, R. M. O.. 1987. Root Identification Manual of Trees and Shrubs. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daumann, E. 1970. Das Blütennektarium der Monocotyledon unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner systematischen und phylogenetischen Bedeutung. Feddes Repertorium 80 463–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMason, D. A. 1983. The primary thickening meristem: definition and function in monocotyledons. American Journal of Botany 70 955–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eames, A. J. and Macdaniels, L. H.. 1925. An Introduction to Plant Anatomy. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Endress, P. K. 2001. The flowers in extant basal angiosperms and inferences on ancestral flowers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162 1111–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdtman, G. 1966. Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Esau, K. 1977. Anatomy of Seed Plants. Canada: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Fahn, A. 1979. Secretory Tissues in Plants. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. J. 1984. The development and dynamics of the root apical meristem. American Journal of Botany 71 1308–1314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, A. S. 1956. Plant idioblasts; remarkable examples of cell specialisation. Protoplasma 46 184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, A. S. and Gifford, E. M.. 1989. Comparative Morphology of Vascular Plants. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
French, J. C. 1986. Patterns of stamen vasculature in the Araceae. American Journal of Botany 73 434–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey-Wyssling, A. 1976. The Plant Cell Wall. Third edition. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger.Google Scholar
Furness, C. A. and Rudall, P. J.. 1999. Inaperturate pollen in monocotyledons. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furness, C. A. and Rudall, P. J.. 2001. The tapetum in basal angiosperms: early diversity. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furness, C. A., Rudall, P. J. and Sampson, F. B.. 2002. Evolution of microsporogenesis in angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furness, C. A. and Rudall, P. J.. 2003. Apertures with lids: distribution and significance of operculate pollen in monocots. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164 835–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furness, C. A. and Rudall, P. J.. 2004. Pollen aperture evolution – a crucial factor for eudicot success?Trends in Plant Science 9 1360–1385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galatis, B. and Apostolakos, P.. 2004. The role of the cytoskeleton in morphogenesis and function of stomatal complexes. Tansley Review. New Phytologist 161 613–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, E. M. and Corson, G. E.. 1971. The shoot apex in seed plants. Botanical Review 37 147–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graven, P., Koster, C. G., Boon, J. J. and Bouman, F.. 1996. Structure and macromolecular composition of the seed coat of the Musaceae. Annals of Botany 77 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grootjen, C. J. and Bouman, F.. 1988. Seed structure in Cannaceae: taxonomic and ecological implications. Annals of Botany 61 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagemann, W. 1973. The organization of shoot development. Revista Biologia (Lisbon) 9 43–67.Google Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, H. and Y. Heslop-Harrison. 1982. The specialised cuticles of the receptive surfaces of angiosperm stigmas. In: The Plant Cuticle. Cutler, D. F., Alvin, K. L. and Price, C. E. (eds). London: Academic Press, pp. 99–119.Google Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, J. 1976. The adaptive significance of the exine. In: The Evolutionary Significance of the Exine. Ferguson, I. K. and Muller, I. (eds). London: Academic Press, pp. 27–37.Google Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, J. and Shivanna, K. R.. 1977. The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. Annals of Botany 41 1233–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, J. 1987. Pollen germination and pollen-tube growth. International Reviews in Cytology 107 1–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, L. J. 1973. A classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. American Journal of Botany 60 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holroyd, G. H., Hetherington, A. M. and Gray, J. E.. 2002. A role for the cuticular waxes in the environmental control of stomatal development. New Phytologist 153 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horner, H. T. and Arnott, H. J.. 1966. Histochemical and ultrastructural study of pre- and post-germinated Yucca seeds. Botanical Gazette 127 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R. A. 1974. The stem–node–Ieaf continuum of the Dicotyledonae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 55 125–181.Google Scholar
Iqbal, M. 1995. Structure and behaviour of vascular cambium and the mechanism and control of cambial growth. In: The Cambial Derivatives, Iqbal, M. (ed.). Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger, pp. 1–67.Google Scholar
Janssen, B. J., Lund, L. and Sinha, N.. 1998. Overexpression of a homeobox gene, LET6, reveals indeterminate features in the tomato compound leaf. Plant Physiology 117 771–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jernstedt, J. A. 1984. Root contraction in hyacinth. I. Effects of IAA on differential cell expansion. American Journal of Botany 71 1080–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. A. and McCormick, S.. 2001. Pollen germinates precociously in the anthers of raring-to-go, an Arabidopsis gametophytic mutant. Plant Physiology 126 685–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johri, B. M. 1992. Haustorial role of pollen tubes. Annals of Botany 70 471–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juniper, B. E. and Jeffree, C. E.. 1983. Plant Surfaces. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. R. 1973. The Monocotyledons: their evolution and comparative biology. VII. The problem of leaf morphology and evolution in the Monocotyledons. Quarterly Review of Biology 48 437–451.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. R. 1975. Comparative developmental evaluation of the morphology of unifacial leaves in the monocotyledons. Botanische Jahrbücher 95 1–105.Google Scholar
Kauff, F., Rudall, P. J. and Conran, J. G.. 2000. Systematic root anatomy of Asparagales and other monocotyledons. Plant Systematics and Evolution 223 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Q. O. N., Daoud, H. S. and Stirton, C. H.. 1981. Pigment distribution, light reflection and cell structure in petals. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 83 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, R. B. 1984. The pollen grain. In: Embryology of Angiosperms, Johri, B. M. (ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 197–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuijt, J. 1969. The biology of parasitic flowering plants. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, P. R. 1984. The role of subsidiary trace bundles in stem and leaf development of the Dicotyledonae. In: Contemporary Problems in Plant AnatomyWhite, R. A. and Dickison, W. C. (eds.). London: Academic Press, 109–143.Google Scholar
Lersten, N. R. 2004. Flowering Plant Embryology. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maheshwari, P. 1950. An Introduction to the Embryology of the Angiosperms. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, P. 1975. Evolution of the laticifer in Euphorbia as interpreted from starch grain morphology. American Journal of Botany 62 577–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, P. 1993. Laticifers – an historical perspective. Botanical Review 59 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCully, M. E. 1975. The development of lateral roots. In: The Development and Function of Roots. Torrey, J. G. and Clarkson, D. T. (eds.). London: Academic Press, pp. 105–124.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, C. R. and Chalk, L.. 1983. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. II. Second edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Natesh, S. and M. A. Rau. 1984. The embryo. In: Embryology of Angiosperms. Johri, B. M. (ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 377–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nepi, M. and E. Pacini. 1999. What may be the significance of polysiphony in Lavatera arborea? In: Anther and Pollen: from Biology to Biotechnology. Clement, C. and Audran, J. C. (eds.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dowd, D. J. 1982. Pearl bodies as ant food: an ecological role for some leaf emergences of tropical plants. Biotropica 14 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormense, S., Havelange, A., Bernier, G. and Schoot, C.. 2002. The shoot apical meritem of Sinapis alba L. expands its central symplastic field during the floral transition. Planta 215 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkin, J. 1928. The glossy petal of Ranunculus. Annals of Botany 42 739–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parre, E. and Geitmann, A.. 2005. More than a leak sealant: the mechanical properties of callose in pollen tubes. Plant Physiology 137 274–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pate, J. S. and Gunning, B. E. S.. 1972. Transfer cells. Annual Reviews in Plant Physiology 23 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, C. J. and Lersten, N. R.. 1991. Gynoecial ontogeny and morphology, and pollen tube pathway in black maple, Acer saccharum ssp. nigrum (Aceraceae). American Journal of Botany 87 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prychid, C. J. and Rudall, P. J.. 1999. Calcium oxalate crystals in monocotyledons: structure and systematics. Annals of Botany 84 725–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prychid, C. J., Rudall, P. J. and Gregory, M.. 2003. Systematics and biology of silica bodies in monocotyledons. Botanical Review 69 377–440.Google Scholar
Punt, W., Blackmore, S., Nilsson, S. and Thomas, A.. 1994. Glossary of Pollen and Spore Terminology. Utrecht: LPP Foundation.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, H. 1983. Stomatal development in families of Liliales. Botanische Jahrbücher 104 261–287.Google Scholar
Reiser, L. and Fischer, R. L.. 1993. The ovule and the embryo sac. The Plant Cell 5 1291–1301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudall, P. J. 1987. Laticifers in Euphorbiaceae – a conspectus. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 94 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudall, P. J. 1991. Lateral meristems and stem thickening growth in monocotyledons. Botanical Review 57 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudall, P. J. and L. Clark. 1992. The megagametophyte in Labiatae. In: Advances in Labiate Science, Harley, R. M. and Reynolds, T. R. (eds.). London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 65–84.Google Scholar
Rudall, P. J. 1994. Laticifers in Crotonoideae (Euphorbiaceae): homology and evolution. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 81 270–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudall, P. J. 1995. Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. VIII. Iridaceae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rudall, P. J. 1997. The nucellus and chalaza in monocotyledons: structure and systematics. Botanical Review 63 140–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudall, P. J. 2002. Homologies of inferior ovaries and septal nectaries in monocotyledons. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudall, P. J. and M. Buzgo. 2002. Evolutionary history of the monocot leaf. In: Developmental Genetics and Plant Evolution, Cronk, Q. C. B., Bateman, R. M. and Hawkins, J. A. (eds.). London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 432–458.Google Scholar
Rudall, P. J., Stuppy, W., Cunniff, J., Kellogg, E. A. and Briggs, B. G.. 2005. Evolution of reproductive structures in grasses (Poaceae) inferred by sister-group comparison with their putative closest living relatives, Ecdeiocoleaceae. American Journal of Botany 92 1432–1443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryding, O. 1992. The distribution and evolution of myxocarpy in Lamiaceae. In: Advances in Labiate Science. Harley, R. M. and Reynolds, T. R. (eds.). London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 85–96.Google Scholar
Sage, R. F. 2004. The evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Tansley Review. New Phytologist 161 341–370.Google Scholar
Sampson, F. B. 2000. Pollen diversity in some modern Magnoliids. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 S193–S210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shigo, A. L. 1985. How tree branches are attached to trunks. Canadian Journal of Botany 63 1391–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, D. J., Hill, T. A. and Gasser, C. S.. 2004. Regulation of ovule development. Plant Cell 16 S32–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steer, M. and Steer, J.. 1989. Pollen tube tip growth. New Phytologist 111 323–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steeves, T. A. and Sussex, I. M.. 1989. Patterns in Plant Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, P. F. (2006). Angiosperm phylogeny website. Version 6. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/Research/APweb/
Stevenson, D. W. 1980. Radial growth in Beaucarnea recurvata. American Journal of Botany 67 476–489.Google Scholar
Stevenson, D. W. and Fisher, J. B.. 1980. The developmental relationship between primary and secondary thickening growth in Cordyline (Agavaceae). Botanical Gazette 141 264–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, W. N. and Rothwell, G. W.. 1993. Paleobotany and the Evolution of Plants, Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sylvester, A. W., Smith, L. and Freeling, M.. 1996. Acquisition of identity in the developing leaf. Annual Reviews of Cell and Developmental Biology 12 257–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sylvester, A. W. 2000. Division decisions and the spatial regulation of cytokinesis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3 58–66.Google Scholar
Tillich, H. J. 1995. Seedlings and systematics in monocotyledons. In: Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution, Rudall, P. J., Cribb, P. J., Cutler, D. F., Humphries, C. J. (eds.). Royal Botanic Gardens, London/Kew, pp. 303–352.Google Scholar
Tilton, V. R. and Horner, H. T.. 1980. Stigma, style and obturator of Ornithogalum caudatum (Liliaceae) and their function in the reproductive process. American Journal of Botany 67 1113–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B. and Zimmerman, M. H.. 1969. Vascular anatomy of monocotyledons with secondary growth – an introduction. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 50 159–179.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B. 1974. Development of the stomatal complex as a taxonomic character in Monocotyledons. Taxon 23 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, S. C. 1972. The role of ontogenetic evidence in floral morphology. In: Advances in Plant Morphology, Murty, Y. S., et al. (eds.). Meerut: Sarita Prakashan, pp. 359–369.Google Scholar
Twell, D. 2002. The developmental biology of pollen. In: Plant Reproduction. Annual Plant Reviews 6. O'Neill, S. D. and Roberts, J. A. (eds.). Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, pp. 86–153.Google Scholar
Uhl, N. W. and Moore, H. E.. 1977. Centrifugal stamen initiation in phytelephantoid palms. American Journal of Botany 64 1152–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bel, A. J. E., Ehlers, K. and Knoblauch, M.. 2002. Sieve elements caught in the act. Trends in Plant Science 7 126–132.Google Scholar
Vijayaraghavan, M. R. and K. Prabhakar. 1984. The endosperm. In: Embryology of Angiosperms, Johri, B. M. (ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 321–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, S. 1974. Ölbumen und Ölsammelnde Bienen. Tropische und Subtropische Pflanzenwelt 7 285–577.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1990. The role of Scent Glands in Pollination: on the Structure and Function of Osmophores. New Delhi: Amerind.Google Scholar
Wang, X. F., Tao, Y. B. and Lu, Y. T.. 2002. Pollen tubes enter neighbouring ovules by way of receptacle tissue, resulting in increased fruit-set inSagittaria potamogetifolia. Annals of Botany 89 791–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weberling, F. 1989. Morphology of Flowers and Inflorescences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weld, M., Ziegler, J. and Kutchan, T. M.. 2004. The roles of latex and the vascular bundle in morphine biosynthesis in the opium poppy, Papaver somniferum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 13957–13962.Google Scholar
West, M. A. L. and Harada, J. J.. 1993. Embryogenesis in higher plants: an overview. The Plant Cell 5 1361–1369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, H. P. 1979. The plant surface. In: Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. Metcalfe, C. R. and Chalk, L. (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 97–165.Google Scholar
Willemse, M. T. M. and J. L. Van Went. 1984. The female gametophyte. In: Embryology of Angiosperms. Johri, B. M. (ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 159–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadegari, R. and Drews, G. N.. 2004. Female Gametophyte Development. Plant Cell 16 S133–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeung, E. C. and Meinke, D. W.. 1993. Embryogenesis in angiosperms: development of the suspensor. The Plant Cell 5 1361–1369.Google ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M. H. and Tomlinson, P. B.. 1972. The vascular system of monocotyledonous stems. Botanical Gazette 133 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W. R. 1980. Cryptic self-fertilization in the Malpighiaceae. Science 207 892–893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
APG. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85 531–553.CrossRef
APG. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141 399–436.CrossRef
Arber, A. 1934. The Gramineae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arber, A. 1937. Studies in flower structure III. On the ‘corona’ and androecium in certain Amaryllidaceae. Annals of Botany 1 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baijnath, H. and Cutler, D. F.. 1993. A contribution to the anatomy and surface details of leaves of the genus Bulbine (Asphodelaceae) in Africa. South African Journal of Botany 59 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, I. W. 1953. Evolution of the tracheary tissue of land plants. American Journal of Botany 40 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, P. W. 1975. The root cap. In: The development and form of roots. Torrey, J. G. and Clarkson, D. F. (eds). London: Academic Press, pp. 21–54.Google Scholar
Barthlott, W. 1981. Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nordic Journal of Botany 1 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthlott, W. and Wollenweber, E.. 1981. Zur Feinstruktur, Chemie und taxonomischen Signifikanz epicuticularer Wachse und ähnlicher Sekrete. Tropische und Subtropische Pflanzenwelt 32 1–67.Google Scholar
Baum, S. B., Dubrovsky, J. G. and Rost, T. L.. 2002. Apical organization and maturation of the cortex and vascular cylinder in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) roots. American Journal of Botany 89 908–920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaumont, J., Cutler, D. F., Reynolds, T. and Vaughan, J. G.. 1985. The secretory tissue of aloes and their allies. Israel Journal of Botany 34 265–282.Google Scholar
Beck, C. R. 2005. An Introduction to Plant Structure and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnke, H. D. 1991. Distribution and evolution of forms and types of sieve tube plastids in the dicotyledons. Aliso 3 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesewinkel, F. D. and F. Bouman. 1984. The seed: structure. In: Embryology of Angiosperms. Johri, B. M. (ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 567–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouman, F. 1984. The ovule. In: Embryology of Angiosperms. Johri, B. M. (ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 123–157.Google Scholar
Brett, D. W. and Sommerard, A. P.. 1986. Ultrastructural development of plastids in the epidermis and starch layer of glossy Ranunculus petals. Annals of Botany 58 903–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casson, S. A. and Lindsey, K.. 2003. Genes and signalling in root development. Tansley Review. New Phyologist 158 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choat, B., Jansen, S., Zwieniecki, M., Smets, E. and Holbrook, N. M.. 2004. Changes in pit membrane porosity due to deflection and stretching: the role of vestured pits. Journal of Experimental Botany 55 1569–1575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clowes, F. A. L. 1961. Apical meristems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clowes, F. A. L. 1994. Origin of the epidermis in root meristems. New Phytologist 127 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocucci, A. E. and Anton, A. M.. 1988. The grass flower: suggestions on its origin and evolution. Flora 181 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, E. J. H. 1976. The Seeds of Dicotyledons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, D. F., Rudall, P. J., Gasson, P. E. and Gale, R. M. O.. 1987. Root Identification Manual of Trees and Shrubs. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daumann, E. 1970. Das Blütennektarium der Monocotyledon unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner systematischen und phylogenetischen Bedeutung. Feddes Repertorium 80 463–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMason, D. A. 1983. The primary thickening meristem: definition and function in monocotyledons. American Journal of Botany 70 955–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eames, A. J. and Macdaniels, L. H.. 1925. An Introduction to Plant Anatomy. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Endress, P. K. 2001. The flowers in extant basal angiosperms and inferences on ancestral flowers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162 1111–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdtman, G. 1966. Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Esau, K. 1977. Anatomy of Seed Plants. Canada: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Fahn, A. 1979. Secretory Tissues in Plants. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. J. 1984. The development and dynamics of the root apical meristem. American Journal of Botany 71 1308–1314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, A. S. 1956. Plant idioblasts; remarkable examples of cell specialisation. Protoplasma 46 184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, A. S. and Gifford, E. M.. 1989. Comparative Morphology of Vascular Plants. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
French, J. C. 1986. Patterns of stamen vasculature in the Araceae. American Journal of Botany 73 434–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey-Wyssling, A. 1976. The Plant Cell Wall. Third edition. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger.Google Scholar
Furness, C. A. and Rudall, P. J.. 1999. Inaperturate pollen in monocotyledons. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furness, C. A. and Rudall, P. J.. 2001. The tapetum in basal angiosperms: early diversity. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furness, C. A., Rudall, P. J. and Sampson, F. B.. 2002. Evolution of microsporogenesis in angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furness, C. A. and Rudall, P. J.. 2003. Apertures with lids: distribution and significance of operculate pollen in monocots. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164 835–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furness, C. A. and Rudall, P. J.. 2004. Pollen aperture evolution – a crucial factor for eudicot success?Trends in Plant Science 9 1360–1385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galatis, B. and Apostolakos, P.. 2004. The role of the cytoskeleton in morphogenesis and function of stomatal complexes. Tansley Review. New Phytologist 161 613–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, E. M. and Corson, G. E.. 1971. The shoot apex in seed plants. Botanical Review 37 147–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graven, P., Koster, C. G., Boon, J. J. and Bouman, F.. 1996. Structure and macromolecular composition of the seed coat of the Musaceae. Annals of Botany 77 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grootjen, C. J. and Bouman, F.. 1988. Seed structure in Cannaceae: taxonomic and ecological implications. Annals of Botany 61 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagemann, W. 1973. The organization of shoot development. Revista Biologia (Lisbon) 9 43–67.Google Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, H. and Y. Heslop-Harrison. 1982. The specialised cuticles of the receptive surfaces of angiosperm stigmas. In: The Plant Cuticle. Cutler, D. F., Alvin, K. L. and Price, C. E. (eds). London: Academic Press, pp. 99–119.Google Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, J. 1976. The adaptive significance of the exine. In: The Evolutionary Significance of the Exine. Ferguson, I. K. and Muller, I. (eds). London: Academic Press, pp. 27–37.Google Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, J. and Shivanna, K. R.. 1977. The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. Annals of Botany 41 1233–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, J. 1987. Pollen germination and pollen-tube growth. International Reviews in Cytology 107 1–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, L. J. 1973. A classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. American Journal of Botany 60 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holroyd, G. H., Hetherington, A. M. and Gray, J. E.. 2002. A role for the cuticular waxes in the environmental control of stomatal development. New Phytologist 153 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horner, H. T. and Arnott, H. J.. 1966. Histochemical and ultrastructural study of pre- and post-germinated Yucca seeds. Botanical Gazette 127 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R. A. 1974. The stem–node–Ieaf continuum of the Dicotyledonae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 55 125–181.Google Scholar
Iqbal, M. 1995. Structure and behaviour of vascular cambium and the mechanism and control of cambial growth. In: The Cambial Derivatives, Iqbal, M. (ed.). Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger, pp. 1–67.Google Scholar
Janssen, B. J., Lund, L. and Sinha, N.. 1998. Overexpression of a homeobox gene, LET6, reveals indeterminate features in the tomato compound leaf. Plant Physiology 117 771–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jernstedt, J. A. 1984. Root contraction in hyacinth. I. Effects of IAA on differential cell expansion. American Journal of Botany 71 1080–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. A. and McCormick, S.. 2001. Pollen germinates precociously in the anthers of raring-to-go, an Arabidopsis gametophytic mutant. Plant Physiology 126 685–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johri, B. M. 1992. Haustorial role of pollen tubes. Annals of Botany 70 471–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juniper, B. E. and Jeffree, C. E.. 1983. Plant Surfaces. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. R. 1973. The Monocotyledons: their evolution and comparative biology. VII. The problem of leaf morphology and evolution in the Monocotyledons. Quarterly Review of Biology 48 437–451.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. R. 1975. Comparative developmental evaluation of the morphology of unifacial leaves in the monocotyledons. Botanische Jahrbücher 95 1–105.Google Scholar
Kauff, F., Rudall, P. J. and Conran, J. G.. 2000. Systematic root anatomy of Asparagales and other monocotyledons. Plant Systematics and Evolution 223 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Q. O. N., Daoud, H. S. and Stirton, C. H.. 1981. Pigment distribution, light reflection and cell structure in petals. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 83 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, R. B. 1984. The pollen grain. In: Embryology of Angiosperms, Johri, B. M. (ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 197–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuijt, J. 1969. The biology of parasitic flowering plants. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, P. R. 1984. The role of subsidiary trace bundles in stem and leaf development of the Dicotyledonae. In: Contemporary Problems in Plant AnatomyWhite, R. A. and Dickison, W. C. (eds.). London: Academic Press, 109–143.Google Scholar
Lersten, N. R. 2004. Flowering Plant Embryology. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maheshwari, P. 1950. An Introduction to the Embryology of the Angiosperms. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, P. 1975. Evolution of the laticifer in Euphorbia as interpreted from starch grain morphology. American Journal of Botany 62 577–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, P. 1993. Laticifers – an historical perspective. Botanical Review 59 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCully, M. E. 1975. The development of lateral roots. In: The Development and Function of Roots. Torrey, J. G. and Clarkson, D. T. (eds.). London: Academic Press, pp. 105–124.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, C. R. and Chalk, L.. 1983. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. II. Second edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Natesh, S. and M. A. Rau. 1984. The embryo. In: Embryology of Angiosperms. Johri, B. M. (ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 377–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nepi, M. and E. Pacini. 1999. What may be the significance of polysiphony in Lavatera arborea? In: Anther and Pollen: from Biology to Biotechnology. Clement, C. and Audran, J. C. (eds.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dowd, D. J. 1982. Pearl bodies as ant food: an ecological role for some leaf emergences of tropical plants. Biotropica 14 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormense, S., Havelange, A., Bernier, G. and Schoot, C.. 2002. The shoot apical meritem of Sinapis alba L. expands its central symplastic field during the floral transition. Planta 215 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkin, J. 1928. The glossy petal of Ranunculus. Annals of Botany 42 739–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parre, E. and Geitmann, A.. 2005. More than a leak sealant: the mechanical properties of callose in pollen tubes. Plant Physiology 137 274–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pate, J. S. and Gunning, B. E. S.. 1972. Transfer cells. Annual Reviews in Plant Physiology 23 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, C. J. and Lersten, N. R.. 1991. Gynoecial ontogeny and morphology, and pollen tube pathway in black maple, Acer saccharum ssp. nigrum (Aceraceae). American Journal of Botany 87 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prychid, C. J. and Rudall, P. J.. 1999. Calcium oxalate crystals in monocotyledons: structure and systematics. Annals of Botany 84 725–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prychid, C. J., Rudall, P. J. and Gregory, M.. 2003. Systematics and biology of silica bodies in monocotyledons. Botanical Review 69 377–440.Google Scholar
Punt, W., Blackmore, S., Nilsson, S. and Thomas, A.. 1994. Glossary of Pollen and Spore Terminology. Utrecht: LPP Foundation.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, H. 1983. Stomatal development in families of Liliales. Botanische Jahrbücher 104 261–287.Google Scholar
Reiser, L. and Fischer, R. L.. 1993. The ovule and the embryo sac. The Plant Cell 5 1291–1301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudall, P. J. 1987. Laticifers in Euphorbiaceae – a conspectus. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 94 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudall, P. J. 1991. Lateral meristems and stem thickening growth in monocotyledons. Botanical Review 57 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudall, P. J. and L. Clark. 1992. The megagametophyte in Labiatae. In: Advances in Labiate Science, Harley, R. M. and Reynolds, T. R. (eds.). London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 65–84.Google Scholar
Rudall, P. J. 1994. Laticifers in Crotonoideae (Euphorbiaceae): homology and evolution. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 81 270–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudall, P. J. 1995. Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. VIII. Iridaceae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rudall, P. J. 1997. The nucellus and chalaza in monocotyledons: structure and systematics. Botanical Review 63 140–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudall, P. J. 2002. Homologies of inferior ovaries and septal nectaries in monocotyledons. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudall, P. J. and M. Buzgo. 2002. Evolutionary history of the monocot leaf. In: Developmental Genetics and Plant Evolution, Cronk, Q. C. B., Bateman, R. M. and Hawkins, J. A. (eds.). London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 432–458.Google Scholar
Rudall, P. J., Stuppy, W., Cunniff, J., Kellogg, E. A. and Briggs, B. G.. 2005. Evolution of reproductive structures in grasses (Poaceae) inferred by sister-group comparison with their putative closest living relatives, Ecdeiocoleaceae. American Journal of Botany 92 1432–1443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryding, O. 1992. The distribution and evolution of myxocarpy in Lamiaceae. In: Advances in Labiate Science. Harley, R. M. and Reynolds, T. R. (eds.). London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 85–96.Google Scholar
Sage, R. F. 2004. The evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Tansley Review. New Phytologist 161 341–370.Google Scholar
Sampson, F. B. 2000. Pollen diversity in some modern Magnoliids. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 S193–S210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shigo, A. L. 1985. How tree branches are attached to trunks. Canadian Journal of Botany 63 1391–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, D. J., Hill, T. A. and Gasser, C. S.. 2004. Regulation of ovule development. Plant Cell 16 S32–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steer, M. and Steer, J.. 1989. Pollen tube tip growth. New Phytologist 111 323–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steeves, T. A. and Sussex, I. M.. 1989. Patterns in Plant Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, P. F. (2006). Angiosperm phylogeny website. Version 6. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/Research/APweb/
Stevenson, D. W. 1980. Radial growth in Beaucarnea recurvata. American Journal of Botany 67 476–489.Google Scholar
Stevenson, D. W. and Fisher, J. B.. 1980. The developmental relationship between primary and secondary thickening growth in Cordyline (Agavaceae). Botanical Gazette 141 264–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, W. N. and Rothwell, G. W.. 1993. Paleobotany and the Evolution of Plants, Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sylvester, A. W., Smith, L. and Freeling, M.. 1996. Acquisition of identity in the developing leaf. Annual Reviews of Cell and Developmental Biology 12 257–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sylvester, A. W. 2000. Division decisions and the spatial regulation of cytokinesis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3 58–66.Google Scholar
Tillich, H. J. 1995. Seedlings and systematics in monocotyledons. In: Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution, Rudall, P. J., Cribb, P. J., Cutler, D. F., Humphries, C. J. (eds.). Royal Botanic Gardens, London/Kew, pp. 303–352.Google Scholar
Tilton, V. R. and Horner, H. T.. 1980. Stigma, style and obturator of Ornithogalum caudatum (Liliaceae) and their function in the reproductive process. American Journal of Botany 67 1113–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B. and Zimmerman, M. H.. 1969. Vascular anatomy of monocotyledons with secondary growth – an introduction. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 50 159–179.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B. 1974. Development of the stomatal complex as a taxonomic character in Monocotyledons. Taxon 23 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, S. C. 1972. The role of ontogenetic evidence in floral morphology. In: Advances in Plant Morphology, Murty, Y. S., et al. (eds.). Meerut: Sarita Prakashan, pp. 359–369.Google Scholar
Twell, D. 2002. The developmental biology of pollen. In: Plant Reproduction. Annual Plant Reviews 6. O'Neill, S. D. and Roberts, J. A. (eds.). Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, pp. 86–153.Google Scholar
Uhl, N. W. and Moore, H. E.. 1977. Centrifugal stamen initiation in phytelephantoid palms. American Journal of Botany 64 1152–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bel, A. J. E., Ehlers, K. and Knoblauch, M.. 2002. Sieve elements caught in the act. Trends in Plant Science 7 126–132.Google Scholar
Vijayaraghavan, M. R. and K. Prabhakar. 1984. The endosperm. In: Embryology of Angiosperms, Johri, B. M. (ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 321–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, S. 1974. Ölbumen und Ölsammelnde Bienen. Tropische und Subtropische Pflanzenwelt 7 285–577.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1990. The role of Scent Glands in Pollination: on the Structure and Function of Osmophores. New Delhi: Amerind.Google Scholar
Wang, X. F., Tao, Y. B. and Lu, Y. T.. 2002. Pollen tubes enter neighbouring ovules by way of receptacle tissue, resulting in increased fruit-set inSagittaria potamogetifolia. Annals of Botany 89 791–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weberling, F. 1989. Morphology of Flowers and Inflorescences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weld, M., Ziegler, J. and Kutchan, T. M.. 2004. The roles of latex and the vascular bundle in morphine biosynthesis in the opium poppy, Papaver somniferum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 13957–13962.Google Scholar
West, M. A. L. and Harada, J. J.. 1993. Embryogenesis in higher plants: an overview. The Plant Cell 5 1361–1369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, H. P. 1979. The plant surface. In: Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. Metcalfe, C. R. and Chalk, L. (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 97–165.Google Scholar
Willemse, M. T. M. and J. L. Van Went. 1984. The female gametophyte. In: Embryology of Angiosperms. Johri, B. M. (ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 159–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadegari, R. and Drews, G. N.. 2004. Female Gametophyte Development. Plant Cell 16 S133–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeung, E. C. and Meinke, D. W.. 1993. Embryogenesis in angiosperms: development of the suspensor. The Plant Cell 5 1361–1369.Google ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M. H. and Tomlinson, P. B.. 1972. The vascular system of monocotyledonous stems. Botanical Gazette 133 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Paula J. Rudall, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
  • Book: Anatomy of Flowering Plants
  • Online publication: 02 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801709.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Paula J. Rudall, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
  • Book: Anatomy of Flowering Plants
  • Online publication: 02 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801709.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Paula J. Rudall, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
  • Book: Anatomy of Flowering Plants
  • Online publication: 02 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801709.010
Available formats
×